So, coronavirus...

[C69]

Some guy on some press conference currently on the BBC just said cases 50,000 a day and rising based on.... ONS data.

That guy being one of the scientists alongside Boris at a Press conference.

[Insane_Homer]

[sefton]

Reminds me so much of Bimbo’s amazing command of stats when he and Silver were trying to prove that global temperatures weren’t rising.

[frodder]

That's a lot of graphics there. Get on with it

[Insane_Homer]

Some guy on some press conference currently on the BBC just said cases 50,000 a day and rising based on.... ONS data.

Yep, , I’ve checked all your posts here though and your cases get no where near.
Are you saying you’ve posted bullshit ?

I've only posted what's been reported, you're the one who makes predictions. You keep attributing what that to me directly, it's worryingly obsessive. To be clear, I'm not Chris Whitty.

[Bimbowomxn]

Some guy on some press conference currently on the BBC just said cases 50,000 a day and rising based on.... ONS data.

That guy being one of the scientists alongside Boris at a Press conference.

Well he was either right or the numbers being produced by the NHS and PHE are bollocks.

He also would need to adjust the predicted IFR substantially.

[Bimbowomxn]

Some guy on some press conference currently on the BBC just said cases 50,000 a day and rising based on.... ONS data.

Yep, , I’ve checked all your posts here though and your cases get no where near.
Are you saying you’ve posted bullshit ?

I've only posted what's been reported, you're the one who makes predictions. You keep attributing what that to me directly, it's worryingly obsessive. To be clear, I'm not Chris Whitty.

No, you went with the 50,000 a day until challenged , then like the issue of false positives you ran away.

[Insane_Homer]

Well he was either right or the numbers being produced by the NHS and PHE are bollocks.

He also would need to adjust the predicted IFR substantially.

Are those the same NHS/PHE bollocks number of 'failing' cases

Don't forget the ONS, you like ONS numbers, Yes? Or only when they suite your agenda?

[Insane_Homer]

No, you went with the 50,000 a day until challenged , then like the issue of false positives you ran away.

I reported that Whitty said it could get to 50,000 "if we did nothing" by mid Oct. Once again, I'M NOT CHRIS WHITTY!

You predicted it wouldn't get to that (you were so certain, you wanted a flounce bet) by the end of this month and that's now been reported as much higher by Imperial College and now ONS provided numbers stated just now

But now you're having to run back to 'false positives' as your fall back argument because I put you on ignore after your farcical "rebuttal"

[Bimbowomxn]

No, you went with the 50,000 a day until challenged , then like the issue of false positives you ran away.

I reported that Whitty said it could get to 50,000 "if we did nothing" by mid Oct. Once again, I'M NOT CHRIS WHITTY!

You predicted it would be to that by the end of this month and that's now been reported as much higher by Imperial College and now ONS provided numbers stated just now

But now you're having to run back to 'false positives' as your fall back argument because I put you on ignore after your farcical "rebuttal"

You were totally wrong on false positives like the opposite of right . You didn’t understand it. And when you realised you ran away.

Oh, and all you had to say about 50,000 is “I don’t believe what I’ve reported”. You didn’t again you ran away.

There’s a pattern.

[sefton]

So the clown still thinks he was right to ignore the scientific consensus and not put a national lockdown in earlier.

[frodder]

My young daughter sat next to me casually pointed at BJ and said "He's an idiot". Kids know so much these days

[Glaston]

So the clown still thinks he was right to ignore the scientific consensus and not put a national lockdown in earlier.

Would you northern cunts have have even bothered following a lock down, you have not bothered with following tier2 ,tier 3or 4

[Bimbowomxn]

So the clown still thinks he was right to ignore the scientific consensus and not put a national lockdown in earlier.

That was the consensus of one group of scientists not “scientific consensus “


There’s a HUGE difference.

[sefton]

So the clown still thinks he was right to ignore the scientific consensus and not put a national lockdown in earlier.

That was the consensus of one group of scientists not “scientific consensus “


There’s a HUGE difference.

Just like your climate change mates, you clueless clown.

[Bimbowomxn]

So the clown still thinks he was right to ignore the scientific consensus and not put a national lockdown in earlier.

That was the consensus of one group of scientists not “scientific consensus “


There’s a HUGE difference.

Just like your climate change mates, you clueless clown.

Yeah the epidemiology department at Oxford University is a real outsider. Berk.

[Insane_Homer]

Oh, and all you had to say about 50,000 is “I don’t believe what I’ve reported”. You didn’t again you ran away.

There’s a pattern.

that's the second time today you've argued what I 'should have said'

It's quite normal to reporting newsworthy Government Scientists press conference statements without having to provide a personal comment. It's however very worrying when you keep attributing these reports as my personal predictions, quite revealing.

PS. All reported cases includes the false positives in the count.

[Insane_Homer]

Berk.

How to spot when you're winning.

[Bimbowomxn]

Oh, and all you had to say about 50,000 is “I don’t believe what I’ve reported”. You didn’t again you ran away.

There’s a pattern.

that's the second time today you've argued what I 'should have said'

It's quite normal to reporting newsworthy Government Scientists press conference statements without having to provide a personal comment. It's however very worrying when you keep attributing these reports as my personal predictions, quite revealing.

PS. All reported cases includes the false positives in the count.

Yeah, you posted it, and ran away when asked to defend the post.

Berk.

[Bimbowomxn]

Boris will be gone by June next year.

[frodder]

I haven't seen Berk used as a reference for years

[sefton]

That was the consensus of one group of scientists not “scientific consensus “


There’s a HUGE difference.

Just like your climate change mates, you clueless clown.

Yeah the epidemiology department at Oxford University is a real outsider. Berk.

They are on this. The scientific consensus is for a lockdown. You can deny it to the day you are six feet under but that doesn’t change the reality.

[Bimbowomxn]

PS. All reported cases includes the false positives in the count.

“Very few” .....


Then runs away.

[Sandstorm]

So the clown still thinks he was right to ignore the scientific consensus and not put a national lockdown in earlier.

He had to. You northern monkeys were threatening to get off the sofa and March on London.

[frodder]

So the clown still thinks he was right to ignore the scientific consensus and not put a national lockdown in earlier.

He had to. You northern monkeys were threatening to get off the sofa and March on London.

Reported for racism towards Sefton

[Bimbowomxn]

The bigger issue is the handling of what isn’t really a “wave” more a time of the year for respiratory illnesses of which Covid was going to be prevalent.

Why are the nightingales closed. And why aren’t they the go to for covid so as to keep it out of general hospitals. ?

Why isn’t the government and NHS immediately implementing the “plan” for this emergency situation.?


The virus is now not new, or its existence a surprise. Why is Lockdown the chosen method once again even post knowing the cost of that action.

I have a theory. Lockdowns are political cowardice of the highest order, and this isn’t just Johnson , the same is being implemented across Europe.

But what lockdowns avoid is the actual adult conversation of what is preferable and the honest conversation of the costs as well as the benefits.

They also clearly don’t actually work.

[Bimbowomxn]

Oh, and PS. Those that remain in secure jobs on full pay have no view regarding lockdowns that shouldn’t be discounted by that security, it’s a big difference between losing your life’s work and missing a latte.

[Sandstorm]

The bigger issue is the handling of what isn’t really a “wave” more a time of the year for respiratory illnesses of which Covid was going to be prevalent.

Why are the nightingales closed. And why aren’t they the go to for covid so as to keep it out of general hospitals. ?

Why isn’t the government and NHS immediately implementing the “plan” for this emergency situation.?


The virus is now not new, or its existence a surprise. Why is Lockdown the chosen method once again even post knowing the cost of that action.

I have a theory. Lockdowns are political cowardice of the highest order, and this isn’t just Johnson , the same is being implemented across Europe.

But what lockdowns avoid is the actual adult conversation of what is preferable and the honest conversation of the costs as well as the benefits.

They also clearly don’t actually work.

There is NO WAY you had time to type that all yourself! Who did you steal it from?

[Insane_Homer]

Oh, and PS. Those that remain in secure jobs on full pay have no view regarding lockdowns that shouldn’t be discounted by that security, it’s a big difference between losing your life’s work and missing a latte.

Like those who have a Porsche parked their garage shouldn't have opinions about starving kids?

[Bimbowomxn]

Oh, and PS. Those that remain in secure jobs on full pay have no view regarding lockdowns that shouldn’t be discounted by that security, it’s a big difference between losing your life’s work and missing a latte.

Like those who have a Porsche parked their garage shouldn't have opinions about starving kids?

I support helping “starving” children. Unlike you I don’t have anything in the past to worry about.

Bet your job isn’t in any danger.

[sefton]

But what lockdowns avoid is the actual adult conversation of what is preferable and the honest conversation of the costs as well as the benefits.

Because there hasn’t been a mention of the economic costs of lockdown.

[Bimbowomxn]

But what lockdowns avoid is the actual adult conversation of what is preferable and the honest conversation of the costs as well as the benefits.

Because there hasn’t been a mention of the economic costs of lockdown.

There’s been absolutely no parliamentary discussion costing the potential deaths vs the economic costs no. Every one who mentions the economy gets shouted down .

There should be actual parliamentary scrutiny for spending 400 billion pounds.

I’m taking 30% off your views here due to lack of it affecting you.

[Openside]

ah, there it is, found out again, resort to insult again

So predictable.

Are you Jewish?

You shameful cunt still banging the Typo drum you are a disgrace.

[Openside]

So the clown still thinks he was right to ignore the scientific consensus and not put a national lockdown in earlier.

Damned if he did damned if he didn’t. It’s the twats not obeying social distancing that has caused this not the govt.

[C69]

ah, there it is, found out again, resort to insult again

So predictable.

Are you Jewish?

You shameful cunt still banging the Typo drum you are a disgrace.

Nothing at all to do with any typo.
So stfu, have have posted the reason go look for it.

[Sandstorm]

So the clown still thinks he was right to ignore the scientific consensus and not put a national lockdown in earlier.

Damned if he did damned if he didn’t. It’s the twats not obeying social distancing that has caused this not the govt.

And rich, retired folk like you who don’t care if Granny croaks.

[Bimbowomxn]

Are you Jewish?

You shameful cunt still banging the Typo drum you are a disgrace.

Nothing at all to do with any typo.
So stfu, have have posted the reason go look for it.

There’s no “reason” you filthy cunt, you tried it loads before the typo then ran around like a kid with it.

You’re a disgraceful specimen.

[Bimbowomxn]

So the clown still thinks he was right to ignore the scientific consensus and not put a national lockdown in earlier.

Damned if he did damned if he didn’t. It’s the twats not obeying social distancing that has caused this not the govt.

Sage (note one group not consensus) have more behaviour scientists than biologists, they should have predicted the lack of social distancing and in fact the failure of track and trace.

They’re idiots.

But worse they had no contingency for their mistakes.

[I like neeps]

Agree with Bimbo to be fair that politicians are locking down because they're scared.

But being scared by an ever rising daily death figure is good reason to be scared?

Should've been short sharp lockdowns like in Wales.

[ScarfaceClaw]

You shameful cunt still banging the Typo drum you are a disgrace.

Nothing at all to do with any typo.
So stfu, have have posted the reason go look for it.

There’s no “reason” you filthy cunt, you tried it loads before the typo then ran around like a kid with it.

You’re a disgraceful specimen.

Wow.