Women's 2021 (2022) Rugby World Cup thread
- OomStruisbaai
- Posts: 15951
- Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2020 12:38 pm
- Location: Longest beach in SH
NZ fattie scores.
-
- Posts: 1265
- Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2020 4:35 pm
Fuck me this ref has forgotten her cards. 7 penalties within 10 metres within 10 minutes and the most Wales get is 3 consecutive "Be carefuls"s.




Finally she’s remembered where it is.TheNatalShark wrote: Sun Oct 09, 2022 6:14 am Fuck me this ref has forgotten her cards. 7 penalties within 10 metres within 10 minutes and the most Wales get is 3 consecutive "Be carefuls"s.![]()
![]()
![]()
-
- Posts: 1265
- Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2020 4:35 pm
Hopefully kick on from here, really Wales should have been out of sight at the half.
Mama?
I only watched the extended highlights, but liked what I saw from Italians in attack! USA reminded me of a past Canadian team... can't remember if it was 2006? Coach Langevin seemed to pick the biggest players in most positions, including backs, but the big centres continually got stepped and weren't that effective vs defenders. I'm biased because I worked with a 'long list' scrum half of theirs last year and am a big fan of hers (Shelby Lin) and feel she'd have been a better weapon than the non-weapons they have at scrum half (a less-powerful Sansuss, loving a snipe and a chip kick), but they left her at home, I think.

There's a Rugby Canada belief that even filters down to women's uni that ball goes to the three-woman pod, tip of the arrow either crashes, steps and crashes, or passes on to the next runner who does that. When in contact, offloads are rare, they often fall on their fronts and then place. Over and over. I really liked seeing Japan mix their pod play up quite a bit, obviously lacking the size, and the passing crispness to be more effective. But I loved both the randomness and the side stepping / angles from support runners. Italy had some of that as well in tight play.
Watching live it was very notable that the US players were all about twice the size of the Italians, but depressingly one dimensional. They just kept trying to bludgeon their way through the Italian defence, but the Italians kept firm, and indeed were making loads of turnovers. In contrast the smaller Italians were always looking to move the ball quickly, and had much more skill and guile than the Americans. They were good to watch and were well deserved winners.Niegs wrote: Mon Oct 10, 2022 2:28 amMama?
I only watched the extended highlights, but liked what I saw from Italians in attack! USA reminded me of a past Canadian team... can't remember if it was 2006? Coach Langevin seemed to pick the biggest players in most positions, including backs, but the big centres continually got stepped and weren't that effective vs defenders. I'm biased because I worked with a 'long list' scrum half of theirs last year and am a big fan of hers (Shelby Lin) and feel she'd have been a better weapon than the non-weapons they have at scrum half (a less-powerful Sansuss, loving a snipe and a chip kick), but they left her at home, I think.Our scrum halves are like that as well - just pass and box kick, which can work if your passes are bullets like A Smith and forwards continually pick great lines, but I don't think ours do that well enough. Speaking of passes, loved not just Rigoni's bullets to the wing but also the work rate to get into a good position (one time waving both hands as she saw the option - great player).
There's a Rugby Canada belief that even filters down to women's uni that ball goes to the three-woman pod, tip of the arrow either crashes, steps and crashes, or passes on to the next runner who does that. When in contact, offloads are rare, they often fall on their fronts and then place. Over and over. I really liked seeing Japan mix their pod play up quite a bit, obviously lacking the size, and the passing crispness to be more effective. But I loved both the randomness and the side stepping / angles from support runners. Italy had some of that as well in tight play.
Given that the USA were semi-finalists five years ago, it’s hard not to conclude that they have regressed. I’m sure as well, that coming on the back of their defeat of France, the Italians will be full of confidence.
@Niegs: Yes that's Giada Franco's mumLobby wrote: Mon Oct 10, 2022 7:07 amWatching live it was very notable that the US players were all about twice the size of the Italians, but depressingly one dimensional. They just kept trying to bludgeon their way through the Italian defence, but the Italians kept firm, and indeed were making loads of turnovers. In contrast the smaller Italians were always looking to move the ball quickly, and had much more skill and guile than the Americans. They were good to watch and were well deserved winners.Niegs wrote: Mon Oct 10, 2022 2:28 amMama?
I only watched the extended highlights, but liked what I saw from Italians in attack! USA reminded me of a past Canadian team... can't remember if it was 2006? Coach Langevin seemed to pick the biggest players in most positions, including backs, but the big centres continually got stepped and weren't that effective vs defenders. I'm biased because I worked with a 'long list' scrum half of theirs last year and am a big fan of hers (Shelby Lin) and feel she'd have been a better weapon than the non-weapons they have at scrum half (a less-powerful Sansuss, loving a snipe and a chip kick), but they left her at home, I think.Our scrum halves are like that as well - just pass and box kick, which can work if your passes are bullets like A Smith and forwards continually pick great lines, but I don't think ours do that well enough. Speaking of passes, loved not just Rigoni's bullets to the wing but also the work rate to get into a good position (one time waving both hands as she saw the option - great player).
There's a Rugby Canada belief that even filters down to women's uni that ball goes to the three-woman pod, tip of the arrow either crashes, steps and crashes, or passes on to the next runner who does that. When in contact, offloads are rare, they often fall on their fronts and then place. Over and over. I really liked seeing Japan mix their pod play up quite a bit, obviously lacking the size, and the passing crispness to be more effective. But I loved both the randomness and the side stepping / angles from support runners. Italy had some of that as well in tight play.
Given that the USA were semi-finalists five years ago, it’s hard not to conclude that they have regressed. I’m sure as well, that coming on the back of their defeat of France, the Italians will be full of confidence.
I didn't watch it live because I fell asleep

Surrender pronto, or we'll level Toronto!
15 Vittoria OSTUNI MINUZZI – 17 caps
14 Aura MUZZO – 28 caps
13 Michela SILLARI – 71 caps
12 Beatrice RIGONI – 58 caps
11 Maria MAGATTI – 47 caps
10 Veronica MADIA – 33 caps
9 Sofia STEFAN – 70 caps
8 Elisa GIORDANO – 57 caps, capitano
7 Giada FRANCO – 25 caps
6 Beatrice VERONESE – 13 caps
5 Giordana DUCA – 31 caps
4 Valeria FEDRIGHI – 37 caps
3 Sara SEYE – 9 caps
2 Melissa BETTONI – 73 caps
1 Silvia TURANI – 21 caps
A disposizione
16 Vittoria VECCHINI – 12 caps
17 Gaia MARIS – 13 caps
18 Emanuela STECCA – 3 caps
19 Sara TOUNESI – 25 caps
20 Isabella LOCATELLI – 35 caps
21 Francesca SGORBINI – 14 caps
22 Sara BARATTIN – 108 caps
23 Alyssa D’INCA’ – 11 caps
15 Vittoria OSTUNI MINUZZI – 17 caps
14 Aura MUZZO – 28 caps
13 Michela SILLARI – 71 caps
12 Beatrice RIGONI – 58 caps
11 Maria MAGATTI – 47 caps
10 Veronica MADIA – 33 caps
9 Sofia STEFAN – 70 caps
8 Elisa GIORDANO – 57 caps, capitano
7 Giada FRANCO – 25 caps
6 Beatrice VERONESE – 13 caps
5 Giordana DUCA – 31 caps
4 Valeria FEDRIGHI – 37 caps
3 Sara SEYE – 9 caps
2 Melissa BETTONI – 73 caps
1 Silvia TURANI – 21 caps
A disposizione
16 Vittoria VECCHINI – 12 caps
17 Gaia MARIS – 13 caps
18 Emanuela STECCA – 3 caps
19 Sara TOUNESI – 25 caps
20 Isabella LOCATELLI – 35 caps
21 Francesca SGORBINI – 14 caps
22 Sara BARATTIN – 108 caps
23 Alyssa D’INCA’ – 11 caps
- Torquemada 1420
- Posts: 11910
- Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:22 am
- Location: Hut 8
No thread?
Eng v Fra. These 2 already look light years ahead of most of the other sides. Esp Eng.
Fre FB is as bad under a high ball as any of her male counterparts.
Eng v Fra. These 2 already look light years ahead of most of the other sides. Esp Eng.
Fre FB is as bad under a high ball as any of her male counterparts.
- Torquemada 1420
- Posts: 11910
- Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:22 am
- Location: Hut 8
Sansus, probably Fra's most important player, off and looking like end of tournie 

- Torquemada 1420
- Posts: 11910
- Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:22 am
- Location: Hut 8
FFS. Now Menager sparko so that's the backrow screwed now. Game over.
- Torquemada 1420
- Posts: 11910
- Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:22 am
- Location: Hut 8
Fre player in "can't catch a ball surprise". One day, Fre rugby as a whole will pay some attention to the need to practice this. 

- Torquemada 1420
- Posts: 11910
- Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:22 am
- Location: Hut 8
Fra will have no players left at this rate. Can't see any side beating this brutally strong Eng side.
Superb defence from France to restrict England to just 10 points, but that will surely take a toll on the French in the final quarte, especially as they have already lost two of their best players. To make 127 tackles on one half is exhausting. England have only had to make about 20 tackles.
The one time a French winger managed to catch the ball rather than knocking on, France scored. But England managed to hold on to win in the end.
England won’t be happy with the number of times they were turned over, and how rarely they managed to get over the gain line. Mind you, I think France are probably the only team that can match them physically.
England won’t be happy with the number of times they were turned over, and how rarely they managed to get over the gain line. Mind you, I think France are probably the only team that can match them physically.
Maybe. For all the talk of the French defence, which was very strong, the English defence was not only strong, but aggressive. France barely had any time on the ball before being turned over or forced into a kick. They scored a lovely try, but it was one of those that was far from guaranteed risk play.Lobby wrote: Sat Oct 15, 2022 9:01 am The one time a French winger managed to catch the ball rather than knocking on, France scored. But England managed to hold on to win in the end.
England won’t be happy with the number of times they were turned over, and how rarely they managed to get over the gain line. Mind you, I think France are probably the only team that can match them physically.
Give a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.
Agreed. France had to rely on a moment of (as you say risky) brilliance to score; they didn't come close to scoring in the other 79 minutes of the match. I still think the French defence was notable, if only for the fact that they had to do so much - they made something like 220 tackles.Raggs wrote: Sat Oct 15, 2022 9:43 amMaybe. For all the talk of the French defence, which was very strong, the English defence was not only strong, but aggressive. France barely had any time on the ball before being turned over or forced into a kick. They scored a lovely try, but it was one of those that was far from guaranteed risk play.Lobby wrote: Sat Oct 15, 2022 9:01 am The one time a French winger managed to catch the ball rather than knocking on, France scored. But England managed to hold on to win in the end.
England won’t be happy with the number of times they were turned over, and how rarely they managed to get over the gain line. Mind you, I think France are probably the only team that can match them physically.
As Torq said, England and France really are a class apart, even if France are only ranked 4th by World Rugby.
- Torquemada 1420
- Posts: 11910
- Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:22 am
- Location: Hut 8
Attacking wise, this Fre side has gone backwards from 3 years ago. They rely upon physicality and in Eng they met a side better at that then they are.Lobby wrote: Sat Oct 15, 2022 9:51 am Agreed. France had to rely on a moment of (as you say risky) brilliance to score; they didn't come close to scoring in the other 79 minutes of the match. I still think the French defence was notable, if only for the fact that they had to do so much - they made something like 220 tackles.
As Torq said, England and France really are a class apart, even if France are only ranked 4th by World Rugby.
- Torquemada 1420
- Posts: 11910
- Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:22 am
- Location: Hut 8
Sansus has retired from rugby with immediate effect following her injury against England
https://www.rugbyrama.fr/rugby/coupe-du ... tory.shtml

https://www.rugbyrama.fr/rugby/coupe-du ... tory.shtml
That's dreadful news for her and for France.Torquemada 1420 wrote: Mon Oct 17, 2022 11:32 am Sansus has retired from rugby with immediate effect following her injury against England![]()
https://www.rugbyrama.fr/rugby/coupe-du ... tory.shtml
- Torquemada 1420
- Posts: 11910
- Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:22 am
- Location: Hut 8
She was player of the 6N this year. Whatever slender chance Fra harboured of getting their hands on the comp ahead of Eng went with her.Lobby wrote: Mon Oct 17, 2022 11:36 amThat's dreadful news for her and for France.Torquemada 1420 wrote: Mon Oct 17, 2022 11:32 am Sansus has retired from rugby with immediate effect following her injury against England![]()
https://www.rugbyrama.fr/rugby/coupe-du ... tory.shtml
Fantastic player.Torquemada 1420 wrote: Mon Oct 17, 2022 11:54 amShe was player of the 6N this year. Whatever slender chance Fra harboured of getting their hands on the comp ahead of Eng went with her.Lobby wrote: Mon Oct 17, 2022 11:36 amThat's dreadful news for her and for France.Torquemada 1420 wrote: Mon Oct 17, 2022 11:32 am Sansus has retired from rugby with immediate effect following her injury against England![]()
https://www.rugbyrama.fr/rugby/coupe-du ... tory.shtml
Pauline Bourdon is also very good, and was France’s 1st choice SH before Sansus came on the scene, but I agree the loss of Sansus is a major blow to France’s hopes in this World Cup.
I assume Menager will also have to stand down for a period having been concussed on Saturday (although as the next game is against Fiji, this shouldn’t affect France’s chances).
From Torq’s article:ASMO wrote: Mon Oct 17, 2022 12:28 pm Anterior Cruciate i understand, must have been a bad one for her to retire though, really sad, she was one to watch in this RWC.
Victim of a rupture of the anterior cruciate ligaments and a lesion of the meniscus of the left knee
She had already announced her decision to retire after the World Cup.
- Torquemada 1420
- Posts: 11910
- Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:22 am
- Location: Hut 8
Curious set of emotions for both players given that Bourdon is Sansus's partner. I wonder whether this will motivate Bourdon or distract her?Lobby wrote: Mon Oct 17, 2022 12:15 pm Fantastic player.
Pauline Bourdon is also very good, and was France’s 1st choice SH before Sansus came on the scene, but I agree the loss of Sansus is a major blow to France’s hopes in this World Cup.
I assume Menager will also have to stand down for a period having been concussed on Saturday (although as the next game is against Fiji, this shouldn’t affect France’s chances).