NPR

Give it a rest

Does your mum know you have her phone?

inactionman wrote: ↑Wed Feb 15, 2023 10:23 am Who's next into the hotseat, I wonder.

A look at the 3 main candidates:

https://www.heraldscotland.com/politics ... signation/

https://www.heraldscotland.com/politics ... get-worse/

Big D wrote: ↑Wed Feb 15, 2023 1:53 pm

C69 wrote: ↑Wed Feb 15, 2023 12:43 pm Will the super injunction be lifted and her trans partner be outed?

If there was one I doubt it. As someone with no love at all for her.

1. Who cares. She has a right to a private life.

2. She and her husband have enough money for a £100k+ loan to be insignificant to their finances to a point she "forgot" when her husband made it.

3. She will have enough lawyer friends where they'd provide help to keep it up.

4. See point 1.

On point 1. I believe politicians should have thier private lives reasonably available for the public to udnerstand. They are able to make laws on sex lives and the like should have their own private lives scrutnised.

Blackmac wrote: ↑Wed Feb 15, 2023 3:09 pm

C69 wrote: ↑Wed Feb 15, 2023 12:43 pm Will the super injunction be lifted and her trans partner be outed?

It's about the worst kept secret in Holyrood and I'm fairly certain that no ever suggested a trans partner.

That's news to me, just like her partner was Judy Murray was news to me when it was stated on PR.

eldanielfire wrote: ↑Tue Feb 21, 2023 10:15 am

Blackmac wrote: ↑Wed Feb 15, 2023 3:09 pm

C69 wrote: ↑Wed Feb 15, 2023 12:43 pm Will the super injunction be lifted and her trans partner be outed?

It's about the worst kept secret in Holyrood and I'm fairly certain that no ever suggested a trans partner.

That's news to me, just like her partner was Judy Murray was news to me when it was stated on PR.

It's not news, it's utter bollocks.

eldanielfire wrote: ↑Tue Feb 21, 2023 10:15 am

Blackmac wrote: ↑Wed Feb 15, 2023 3:09 pm

C69 wrote: ↑Wed Feb 15, 2023 12:43 pm Will the super injunction be lifted and her trans partner be outed?

It's about the worst kept secret in Holyrood and I'm fairly certain that no ever suggested a trans partner.

That's news to me, just like her partner was Judy Murray was news to me when it was stated on PR.

You are a simple minded fool though believing that bollocks.
I should have just stopped after fool tbh.

eldanielfire wrote: ↑Tue Feb 21, 2023 10:15 am

Big D wrote: ↑Wed Feb 15, 2023 1:53 pm

C69 wrote: ↑Wed Feb 15, 2023 12:43 pm Will the super injunction be lifted and her trans partner be outed?

If there was one I doubt it. As someone with no love at all for her.

1. Who cares. She has a right to a private life.

2. She and her husband have enough money for a £100k+ loan to be insignificant to their finances to a point she "forgot" when her husband made it.

3. She will have enough lawyer friends where they'd provide help to keep it up.

4. See point 1.

On point 1. I believe politicians should have thier private lives reasonably available for the public to udnerstand. They are able to make laws on sex lives and the like should have their own private lives scrutnised.

What do you mean by the bolded?
In connection with the bit after the bolded.

Blackmac wrote: ↑Tue Feb 21, 2023 6:08 pm

eldanielfire wrote: ↑Tue Feb 21, 2023 10:15 am

Blackmac wrote: ↑Wed Feb 15, 2023 3:09 pm

It's about the worst kept secret in Holyrood and I'm fairly certain that no ever suggested a trans partner.

That's news to me, just like her partner was Judy Murray was news to me when it was stated on PR.

It's not news, it's utter bollocks.

Which was the point I made on PR and am making here. It's silly rumours that are blatently not true.

C69 wrote: ↑Tue Feb 21, 2023 6:25 pm

eldanielfire wrote: ↑Tue Feb 21, 2023 10:15 am

Blackmac wrote: ↑Wed Feb 15, 2023 3:09 pm

It's about the worst kept secret in Holyrood and I'm fairly certain that no ever suggested a trans partner.

That's news to me, just like her partner was Judy Murray was news to me when it was stated on PR.

You are a simple minded fool though believing that bollocks.
I should have just stopped after fool tbh.

Errr my point was it was total bollocks. I specifically made that point on PR, which was also my point here with the trans reference, people are just making up rubbing about her private life.My responses on PR

https://forum.planetrugby.com/viewtopic ... 1&start=80

eldanielfire wrote: ↑Thu Feb 16, 2023 10:11 am
I assumed the lesbian stuff was just a smear.

eldanielfire wrote: ↑Thu Feb 16, 2023 2:32 pm
Was it Judy Murray? I never heard that, but the rumour was certainly just a smear as far as I'm aware. Like years ago they claimed Hilary Clinton had a lesbian affair.

Perhaps actually read what is being referenced rather than through out insults that will ultimately make you look stupidly reactive. Even more weird that you claimed a super injuction on her trans partner in this very thread.

Uncle fester wrote: ↑Tue Feb 21, 2023 7:43 pm

eldanielfire wrote: ↑Tue Feb 21, 2023 10:15 am

Big D wrote: ↑Wed Feb 15, 2023 1:53 pm

If there was one I doubt it. As someone with no love at all for her.

1. Who cares. She has a right to a private life.

2. She and her husband have enough money for a £100k+ loan to be insignificant to their finances to a point she "forgot" when her husband made it.

3. She will have enough lawyer friends where they'd provide help to keep it up.

4. See point 1.

On point 1. I believe politicians should have thier private lives reasonably available for the public to udnerstand. They are able to make laws on sex lives and the like should have their own private lives scrutnised.

What do you mean by the bolded?
In connection with the bit after the bolded.

Politicians made laws on who can marry, how different relationship status' get taxed or given pensions, laws on where children go where relationships split, how religious groups can runa divorce etc etc. As a consequence there is a valid reaosn to know where politicians are coming from there personally.

My new favourite thing is when the anti abortion lot at pro life rallies get approached by people with adoption papers, to try to get them to adopt kids, as they say the woman should take the baby to term and put it up for adoption, and of course not wanting to adopt any kids themselves.

Yes, it is a lot that cheap righty stuff of "well give a refugee your bedroom then, if you want them in the coubtry and care that much, but still. It's pretty wicked.

We need to do this to Jacob Rees Mogg etc..

[media] [/media]

Biffer wrote: ↑Sat Feb 18, 2023 11:11 am Independence allows us to get to a position where we can compare ourselves to smaller countries like Denmark, Norway, Netherlands etc. but the initial comparisons will be about what’s different to the rest of the uk.

Netherlands is arguably closing on a population of 20 million and is (very) arguably a top 20 economy. Which is really to ask what's the definition of a smaller country?

Rhubarb & Custard wrote: ↑Thu Feb 23, 2023 11:34 am

Biffer wrote: ↑Sat Feb 18, 2023 11:11 am Independence allows us to get to a position where we can compare ourselves to smaller countries like Denmark, Norway, Netherlands etc. but the initial comparisons will be about what’s different to the rest of the uk.

Netherlands is arguably closing on a population of 20 million and is (very) arguably a top 20 economy. Which is really to ask what's the definition of a smaller country?

There's obviously no accepted definition, but when I'm talking about it in relation to this topic, I'm thinking about countries that are not going to make an impact on a global stage on their own, and are of a size that their policy making can be fairly nimble. I also consider the geography of Northern / Western Europe when thinking about independence as well. So Ireland, Iceland, Netherlands, Belgium, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, Finland, Switzerland are really the comparator countries I think about in relation to Scotland. Other people might think differently and that's fine. Netherlands is obviously the largest population at just over 3 times that of Scotland.

NB Netherlands population is projected to peak at just over 18 million in the 2030s and then decline a bit.

eldanielfire wrote: ↑Thu Feb 23, 2023 9:23 am

C69 wrote: ↑Tue Feb 21, 2023 6:25 pm

eldanielfire wrote: ↑Tue Feb 21, 2023 10:15 am

That's news to me, just like her partner was Judy Murray was news to me when it was stated on PR.

You are a simple minded fool though believing that bollocks.
I should have just stopped after fool tbh.

Errr my point was it was total bollocks. I specifically made that point on PR, which was also my point here with the trans reference, people are just making up rubbing about her private life.My responses on PR

https://forum.planetrugby.com/viewtopic ... 1&start=80

eldanielfire wrote: ↑Thu Feb 16, 2023 10:11 am
I assumed the lesbian stuff was just a smear.

eldanielfire wrote: ↑Thu Feb 16, 2023 2:32 pm
Was it Judy Murray? I never heard that, but the rumour was certainly just a smear as far as I'm aware. Like years ago they claimed Hilary Clinton had a lesbian affair.

Perhaps actually read what is being referenced rather than through out insults that will ultimately make you look stupidly reactive. Even more weird that you claimed a super injuction on her trans partner in this very thread.

I really don't care what you post on another forum.
PR or Mumsnet is not my concern.
My trans comment was an attempt at humour, not that you would understand such matters.
Now just fuck off.