Angry White Men

[sockwithaticket]

It has to be said though, that behaviour in schools, particularly in Scotland, is at an all time low.

A huge chunk of that is to do with the lack of discipline in the home nowadays

Shitbag cunts create shitbag cunts.

I was once overseeing a lunchtime detention in a computer lab that was also a walkthrough to a couple of classrooms. This 14 year old boy, who is supposed to be sitting there in silence completing work or a detention task, catcalled a couple of girls from the year above as they walked through and couldn't understand why I gave him a bollocking for it. His justification was that his dad does it all the time.

Overheard one kid in class boasting to a classmate about not allowing a gas man into the house because he was a "darkie and we don't let fuckin' darkies in". Where do you think he gets that from?

A kid skipped lunchtime detention, so instantly got upgraded to after school. Skipped that too, so a phonecall to the parents who said they told him to skip it. They don't believe we have the right to keep kids after school, even though punishments and sanctions are part of the code of conduct all parents have to sign before their child took up their place at the scool...

One of the lunch ladies had a a right scrote of a son who was constantly getting into trouble for one thing or another and she was constantly griping at teachers about it. Eventually she got fired for storming into a lesson to confront a teacher who'd provided the evidence in an incident severe enough for a suspension.

Most memorable of all was a boy who got a roasting at a parents' evening from pretty much all his teachers, not because he was particularly poorly behaved, but he just refused to do any work, who came in the next day and smugly thanked a teacher for being so negative. Apparently it prompted his parents to buy him a new Xbox game as a pick me up.

And so on and so forth. It was so bloody draining to deal with. Sod beating the kids, it's the parents who need sorting out.

[sockwithaticket]

My missus is a school librarian and my niece is a history teacher, both have seen a huge decline in behaviour since they started in the job. My niece has witnessed female teachers on the floor reduced to tears from the abuse they've received. A similar thing happened at my missus's school where a female teacher was receiving overtly sexual comments. The headteacher just said "Ah boys will be boys" and that was it. When there's no discipline coming from the top (and also often from home), teachers don't stand a chance.

I once found one of our PGCE students in tears in the department office because of some of the lewd comments older male students made to her. Thankfully our head did take it seriously and the boys were suspended, but it's too little too late. You could see her enthusiasm for teaching die.

[epwc]

We have occasional behavioural issues at the Arabic and Quran classes at mosque, you'd think that the parents would be on the teachers side but invariably they're not.

Society does need fixing, but where do you start?

[Slick]

We have occasional behavioural issues at the Arabic and Quran classes at mosque, you'd think that the parents would be on the teachers side but invariably they're not.

Society does need fixing, but where do you start?

If you can’t scare the shit out of them in a Quran class there is no hope for them

[epwc]

Exactly

[tabascoboy]

Well we all know how it is, go out for a quiet drink and suddenly find tourself forced into trying to burn down a hotel...

A rioter who hurled bricks and lit arrows at police officers during violent disorder outside a hotel has been detained for three years.

Drew Jarvis, 19, was among the crowd of around 400 people who descended on the Holiday Inn Express in Manvers, which was believed to house around 200 asylum seekers at the time, on 4 August.

Jarvis, who was filmed throwing wooden planks, bricks and lit arrows towards officers and the hotel, had claimed to have attended against his will, but later admitted violent disorder.

At Sheffield Crown Court on Tuesday, he was sentenced to three years in a young offender institution and made subject of a criminal behaviour order for 10 years.

Jarvis, of no fixed abode, also said he “got in with the wrong crowd” and did not know “why I did it” before claiming he had been too drunk to remember the incident and that he had been there against his will.

[Hugo]

https://x.com/ClevelandPolice/status/18 ... 3595505931


This lad is apparently a special needs person, autistic. His expression in the mug shot definitely gives that impression. Not sure what purpose is served putting him in prison, I'd say its actually appalling to put someone in prison who would be better served doing some sort of community service and counselling instead of being in a place with career criminals.

[Sandstorm]

Well we all know how it is, go out for a quiet drink and suddenly find tourself forced into trying to burn down a hotel...

A rioter who hurled bricks and lit arrows at police officers during violent disorder outside a hotel has been detained for three years.

Drew Jarvis, 19, was among the crowd of around 400 people who descended on the Holiday Inn Express in Manvers, which was believed to house around 200 asylum seekers at the time, on 4 August.

Jarvis, who was filmed throwing wooden planks, bricks and lit arrows towards officers and the hotel, had claimed to have attended against his will, but later admitted violent disorder.

At Sheffield Crown Court on Tuesday, he was sentenced to three years in a young offender institution and made subject of a criminal behaviour order for 10 years.

Jarvis, of no fixed abode, also said he “got in with the wrong crowd” and did not know “why I did it” before claiming he had been too drunk to remember the incident and that he had been there against his will.

[inactionman]

https://x.com/ClevelandPolice/status/18 ... 3595505931


This lad is apparently a special needs person, autistic. His expression in the mug shot definitely gives that impression. Not sure what purpose is served putting him in prison, I'd say its actually appalling to put someone in prison who would be better served doing some sort of community service and counselling instead of being in a place with career criminals.

I thought establishing fitness to stand trial was part of the whole process - hoping this fast-tracking (short-cutting?) hasn't omitted or watered down this step.

[Lobby]

I suspect this lad could end up with a substantial sentence

A man who looted cosmetics chain Lush during riots in Hull has pleaded guilty to violent disorder, burglary and racially aggravated criminal damage.

John Honey, 25, admitted three charges of burglary at Lush, the O2 store and Shoezone in the city on 3 August.

He also pleaded guilty to the racially aggravated criminal damage of a BMW and damaging nine other cars.

3 charges of burglary, violent disorder, criminal damage to 10 cars and 'racially aggravated' as a contributing factor to increase his jail time.

[Slick]

Well we all know how it is, go out for a quiet drink and suddenly find tourself forced into trying to burn down a hotel...

A rioter who hurled bricks and lit arrows at police officers during violent disorder outside a hotel has been detained for three years.

Drew Jarvis, 19, was among the crowd of around 400 people who descended on the Holiday Inn Express in Manvers, which was believed to house around 200 asylum seekers at the time, on 4 August.

Jarvis, who was filmed throwing wooden planks, bricks and lit arrows towards officers and the hotel, had claimed to have attended against his will, but later admitted violent disorder.

At Sheffield Crown Court on Tuesday, he was sentenced to three years in a young offender institution and made subject of a criminal behaviour order for 10 years.

Jarvis, of no fixed abode, also said he “got in with the wrong crowd” and did not know “why I did it” before claiming he had been too drunk to remember the incident and that he had been there against his will.

Arrows ffs!

[Sandstorm]

I suspect this lad could end up with a substantial sentence

A man who looted cosmetics chain Lush during riots in Hull has pleaded guilty to violent disorder, burglary and racially aggravated criminal damage.

John Honey, 25, admitted three charges of burglary at Lush, the O2 store and Shoezone in the city on 3 August.

He also pleaded guilty to the racially aggravated criminal damage of a BMW and damaging nine other cars.

3 charges of burglary, violent disorder, criminal damage to 10 cars and 'racially aggravated' as a contributing factor to increase his jail time.

BBC reckon these people pleading guilty now are getting 2-3 years, while those who prefer to try their luck at a jury trial could get triple that.

[JM2K6]

Ol'Birbalsingh is an absolute joke. Successful headteacher, but repeatedly shitting the bed in order to appeal to the further-right and feed her need for attention and validation is not a good look. For someone who must be quite smart, she says a lot of really dumb shit quite regularly. It's as if a GB News "expert" also had a good job.

Yeah, you’re the sort of progressive person she’s talking about. Amazing how she’s never heard of you, yet predicted your behaviour.

Taken a failing inner city school to top of the table; maybe you should just drop the politics and listen to her.

There isn't a far right grifter alive that you're not willing to deep throat. But hey, at least she's marginally better than your previous fave, Douglas Murray.

I have listened to her repeatedly, on TV, on twitter, in the papers, which is why I know she's a fucking moron and a raging bigot. She's an extremely stupid person's idea of a clever person.

[JM2K6]

This thread is turning into a Monty Python sketch.

We've now moved onto a "kids these days" bit

[Dogbert]

This thread is turning into a Monty Python sketch.

We've now moved onto a "kids these days" bit

Well I did expect the Spanish Inquisition

[SaintK]

Well said m'lud

[Random1]

Ol'Birbalsingh is an absolute joke. Successful headteacher, but repeatedly shitting the bed in order to appeal to the further-right and feed her need for attention and validation is not a good look. For someone who must be quite smart, she says a lot of really dumb shit quite regularly. It's as if a GB News "expert" also had a good job.

Yeah, you’re the sort of progressive person she’s talking about. Amazing how she’s never heard of you, yet predicted your behaviour.

Taken a failing inner city school to top of the table; maybe you should just drop the politics and listen to her.

There isn't a far right grifter alive that you're not willing to deep throat. But hey, at least she's marginally better than your previous fave, Douglas Murray.

I have listened to her repeatedly, on TV, on twitter, in the papers, which is why I know she's a fucking moron and a raging bigot. She's an extremely stupid person's idea of a clever person.

Yeah, your definition of ‘far right’ is not exactly reliable.

Calling everyone that doesn’t agree with your position an idiot is just boring. We’ve had this conversation so many times.

I’ll say that you’re ad hominem attacking her and not dealing with her points (same as you do with Douglas).

You’ll then say I don’t know what ad hominem means.

I’ll say, yes I do, can you please engage with the point rather than the person.

You then tend to say there’s no point in debating stupid points.

[_Os_]

I suspect this lad could end up with a substantial sentence

A man who looted cosmetics chain Lush during riots in Hull has pleaded guilty to violent disorder, burglary and racially aggravated criminal damage.

John Honey, 25, admitted three charges of burglary at Lush, the O2 store and Shoezone in the city on 3 August.

He also pleaded guilty to the racially aggravated criminal damage of a BMW and damaging nine other cars.

3 charges of burglary, violent disorder, criminal damage to 10 cars and 'racially aggravated' as a contributing factor to increase his jail time.

This was in Hull, some of the most grim incidents in the whole thing. Total lawlessness, the sky filled with towering black smoke from burning tyre barricades and underneath those black clouds open racist violence and looting. When drivers are being targeted because of their race, savage mobs hauling the occupants out of vehicles and wildly trying to destroy the cars whilst the occupants are being beaten or running for their lives, it's legitimate to say it's something close to an attempted pogrom. The BMW is mentioned because that attack went viral, there were others, not only men were attacked for not being white. It's extremely lucky no one died.

This guy is the person wearing the England flag shirt during that chaos in Hull. He's lucky to only be charged with property crimes and not involvement in crimes against people, UK law around joint enterprise means in a group situation where there's intent among all parties in the group to commit crime then all are open to being charged with crimes committed by the group even if they weren't personally involved in that specific incident, crimes against people are more serious than those against property and open to a joint enterprise charge. He has zero remorse, he was asking police if they wanted his autograph, he thinks he's famous because of the media coverage he has received. He'll be fortunate to get 3 years, which looks like the top end so far.

The largest sentences are going to come from the migrant hotel burning incidents. Arson with intent (max life sentence), racially aggravated, violent disorder, assaulting police, it was days in and there was clear prior group organisation (some "protestors" came with fighting dogs and let them loose on police, some came prepared with weapons, others came and watched as a family day out, prior organisation on social media, etc) which opens up possible joint enterprise charges. Seems impossible to argue they didn't all know they were taking part in organised illegal activity as a group. If it happens the usual suspects will cry about how unfair and draconian joint enterprise can be, the same people who didn't care or cheered when it was used against young black men/boys (they never imagine authoritarian laws they love being used against people they support). Hard to see how they get away 3 years. Someone can easily go down for decades for a crime they didn't commit nor intend to commit.

Worth taking notice who is complaining about the law being enforced, which is what stopped this becoming deadly. Same with the people who haven't voiced a word of criticism about the "protestors". Very sinister people. Truss, Braverman, Jenrick, and Big Dog all look even worse.

Patel and Rees-Mogg both come out of it looking better.

[Lobby]

I suspect this lad could end up with a substantial sentence

A man who looted cosmetics chain Lush during riots in Hull has pleaded guilty to violent disorder, burglary and racially aggravated criminal damage.

John Honey, 25, admitted three charges of burglary at Lush, the O2 store and Shoezone in the city on 3 August.

He also pleaded guilty to the racially aggravated criminal damage of a BMW and damaging nine other cars.

3 charges of burglary, violent disorder, criminal damage to 10 cars and 'racially aggravated' as a contributing factor to increase his jail time.

This was in Hull, some of the most grim incidents in the whole thing. Total lawlessness, the sky filled with towering black smoke from burning tyre barricades and underneath those black clouds open racist violence and looting. When drivers are being targeted because of their race, savage mobs hauling the occupants out of vehicles and wildly trying to destroy the cars whilst the occupants are being beaten or running for their lives, it's legitimate to say it's something close to an attempted pogrom. The BMW is mentioned because that attack went viral, there were others, not only men were attacked for not being white. It's extremely lucky no one died.

This guy is the person wearing the England flag shirt during that chaos in Hull. He's lucky to only be charged with property crimes and not involvement in crimes against people, UK law around joint enterprise means in a group situation where there's intent among all parties in the group to commit crime then all are open to being charged with crimes committed by the group even if they weren't personally involved in that specific incident, crimes against people are more serious than those against property and open to a joint enterprise charge. He has zero remorse, he was asking police if they wanted his autograph, he thinks he's famous because of the media coverage he has received. He'll be fortunate to get 3 years, which looks like the top end so far.

The largest sentences are going to come from the migrant hotel burning incidents. Arson with intent (max life sentence), racially aggravated, violent disorder, assaulting police, it was days in and there was clear prior group organisation (some "protestors" came with fighting dogs and let them loose on police, some came prepared with weapons, others came and watched as a family day out, prior organisation on social media, etc) which opens up possible joint enterprise charges. Seems impossible to argue they didn't all know they were taking part in organised illegal activity as a group. If it happens the usual suspects will cry about how unfair and draconian joint enterprise can be, the same people who didn't care or cheered when it was used against young black men/boys (they never imagine authoritarian laws they love being used against people they support). Hard to see how they get away 3 years. Someone can easily go down for decades for a crime they didn't commit nor intend to commit.

Worth taking notice who is complaining about the law being enforced, which is what stopped this becoming deadly. Same with the people who haven't voiced a word of criticism about the "protestors". Very sinister people. Truss, Braverman, Jenrick, and Big Dog all look even worse.

Patel and Rees-Mogg both come out of it looking better.

The CPS are also now charging some of these people with Riot (max sentence 10 years) rather than Violent Disorder (max sentence 5 years), so the top end may well rise beyond 3 years.

[epwc]

There is still plenty of low level stuff going on, had some twats email the mosque this week, plenty of shit floating about on social media.

[JM2K6]

Yeah, you’re the sort of progressive person she’s talking about. Amazing how she’s never heard of you, yet predicted your behaviour.

Taken a failing inner city school to top of the table; maybe you should just drop the politics and listen to her.

There isn't a far right grifter alive that you're not willing to deep throat. But hey, at least she's marginally better than your previous fave, Douglas Murray.

I have listened to her repeatedly, on TV, on twitter, in the papers, which is why I know she's a fucking moron and a raging bigot. She's an extremely stupid person's idea of a clever person.

Yeah, your definition of ‘far right’ is not exactly reliable.

Calling everyone that doesn’t agree with your position an idiot is just boring. We’ve had this conversation so many times.

I’ll say that you’re ad hominem attacking her and not dealing with her points (same as you do with Douglas).

You’ll then say I don’t know what ad hominem means.

I’ll say, yes I do, can you please engage with the point rather than the person.

You then tend to say there’s no point in debating stupid points.

I don't care if it bores you. I don't think people who follow Douglas Murray and his ilk are looking for actual conversation. Vile far right scumbags are not people you should be listening to, let alone repeatedly boosting on public forums. Your history of who you choose to listen to and promote says absolutely everything about you.

Birbalsingh is someone who, like her fan Jordan Peterson (who says she's more right wing and more conservative than him, btw), will say absolutely anything that sounds clever but doesn't hold up to scrutiny whatsoever. She peddles in the same shock-jock bigotry that appeals to a very small section of society. She's cut from the same cloth as Braverman and Badenoch, and the country has just rejected those sorts of grim charlatans who are willing to do anything and say anything if it gets them where they want to be in life. I have no idea if she's a true believer like Murray, or is just doing it for the attention and the rewards, but in my opinion there is no reason to care. Performativie bigotry is still bigotry. Whether she and other Spiked and Spectator lunatic opinionistas actually believe the shit they're peddling is deeply second to the fact that they say stupid, horrific, divisive crap for their own personal benefit on a regular basis.

These culture warriors are not your friends. They do not have anything useful to say about modern society. They are in fact not providing any sane answers or reasonable viewpoints. But no amount of her repeating the most blatantly obvious lies or coming out with the dumbest statements more regularly than trains to Waterloo will prevent a small but fanatical part of society - a part you appear to be in - of eagely gulping down what she's excreting without a second's critical though.

She has claimed that both private and state schools "peddle extreme leftist views" and that they are riddled with "the woke agenda". Claiming this while giving a speech at NatCon, a conference beloved by the far right, no less. That's the stuff she says when she's prepared! I won't even touch the incredibly stupid things she's said off the cuff in interviews and on twitter. You'd have to be braindead to take her seriously.

[Tichtheid]

There isn't a far right grifter alive that you're not willing to deep throat. But hey, at least she's marginally better than your previous fave, Douglas Murray.

I have listened to her repeatedly, on TV, on twitter, in the papers, which is why I know she's a fucking moron and a raging bigot. She's an extremely stupid person's idea of a clever person.

Yeah, your definition of ‘far right’ is not exactly reliable.

Calling everyone that doesn’t agree with your position an idiot is just boring. We’ve had this conversation so many times.

I’ll say that you’re ad hominem attacking her and not dealing with her points (same as you do with Douglas).

You’ll then say I don’t know what ad hominem means.

I’ll say, yes I do, can you please engage with the point rather than the person.

You then tend to say there’s no point in debating stupid points.

I don't care if it bores you. I don't think people who follow Douglas Murray and his ilk are looking for actual conversation. Vile far right scumbags are not people you should be listening to, let alone repeatedly boosting on public forums. Your history of who you choose to listen to and promote says absolutely everything about you.

Birbalsingh is someone who, like her fan Jordan Peterson (who says she's more right wing and more conservative than him, btw), will say absolutely anything that sounds clever but doesn't hold up to scrutiny whatsoever. She peddles in the same shock-jock bigotry that appeals to a very small section of society. She's cut from the same cloth as Braverman and Badenoch, and the country has just rejected those sorts of grim charlatans who are willing to do anything and say anything if it gets them where they want to be in life. I have no idea if she's a true believer like Murray, or is just doing it for the attention and the rewards, but in my opinion there is no reason to care. Performativie bigotry is still bigotry. Whether she and other Spiked and Spectator lunatic opinionistas actually believe the shit they're peddling is deeply second to the fact that they say stupid, horrific, divisive crap for their own personal benefit on a regular basis.

These culture warriors are not your friends. They do not have anything useful to say about modern society. They are in fact not providing any sane answers or reasonable viewpoints. But no amount of her repeating the most blatantly obvious lies or coming out with the dumbest statements more regularly than trains to Waterloo will prevent a small but fanatical part of society - a part you appear to be in - of eagely gulping down what she's excreting without a second's critical though.

She has claimed that both private and state schools "peddle extreme leftist views" and that they are riddled with "the woke agenda". Claiming this while giving a speech at NatCon, a conference beloved by the far right, no less. That's the stuff she says when she's prepared! I won't even touch the incredibly stupid things she's said off the cuff in interviews and on twitter. You'd have to be braindead to take her seriously.

There seems to be a flailing around in desperation, trying to find some kind of intellectual basis to what is at its core is a regressive, divisive, insular view point. Peterson and Murray are certainly cut of that cloth, Bilbalsingh is new to me but seems to be following the same path.
Peterson in particular uses what appears to be deliberately opaque language to mask a stupid point, it's like QAnon for people who fancy themselves as intellectuals, but he does seem to impress some folk.

I had a look at the school Birbalsingh set up, I can only imagine the reception in the press that school would have had if it had been put in place by someone associated with the Labour Party - the strict uniforms, the shuffling along the corridors in silent single file, the ostracising of someone who didn't bring in their dinner money, the enforced praising of the school, each other and the staff, I can see screeching headlines of "Maoist Indoctrination Schools"

[JM2K6]

Yeah, your definition of ‘far right’ is not exactly reliable.

Calling everyone that doesn’t agree with your position an idiot is just boring. We’ve had this conversation so many times.

I’ll say that you’re ad hominem attacking her and not dealing with her points (same as you do with Douglas).

You’ll then say I don’t know what ad hominem means.

I’ll say, yes I do, can you please engage with the point rather than the person.

You then tend to say there’s no point in debating stupid points.

I don't care if it bores you. I don't think people who follow Douglas Murray and his ilk are looking for actual conversation. Vile far right scumbags are not people you should be listening to, let alone repeatedly boosting on public forums. Your history of who you choose to listen to and promote says absolutely everything about you.

Birbalsingh is someone who, like her fan Jordan Peterson (who says she's more right wing and more conservative than him, btw), will say absolutely anything that sounds clever but doesn't hold up to scrutiny whatsoever. She peddles in the same shock-jock bigotry that appeals to a very small section of society. She's cut from the same cloth as Braverman and Badenoch, and the country has just rejected those sorts of grim charlatans who are willing to do anything and say anything if it gets them where they want to be in life. I have no idea if she's a true believer like Murray, or is just doing it for the attention and the rewards, but in my opinion there is no reason to care. Performativie bigotry is still bigotry. Whether she and other Spiked and Spectator lunatic opinionistas actually believe the shit they're peddling is deeply second to the fact that they say stupid, horrific, divisive crap for their own personal benefit on a regular basis.

These culture warriors are not your friends. They do not have anything useful to say about modern society. They are in fact not providing any sane answers or reasonable viewpoints. But no amount of her repeating the most blatantly obvious lies or coming out with the dumbest statements more regularly than trains to Waterloo will prevent a small but fanatical part of society - a part you appear to be in - of eagely gulping down what she's excreting without a second's critical though.

She has claimed that both private and state schools "peddle extreme leftist views" and that they are riddled with "the woke agenda". Claiming this while giving a speech at NatCon, a conference beloved by the far right, no less. That's the stuff she says when she's prepared! I won't even touch the incredibly stupid things she's said off the cuff in interviews and on twitter. You'd have to be braindead to take her seriously.

There seems to be a flailing around in desperation, trying to find some kind of intellectual basis to what is at its core is a regressive, divisive, insular view point. Peterson and Murray are certainly cut of that cloth, Bilbalsingh is new to me but seems to be following the same path.
Peterson in particular uses what appears to be deliberately opaque language to mask a stupid point, it's like QAnon for people who fancy themselves as intellectuals, but he does seem to impress some folk.

I had a look at the school Birbalsingh set up, I can only imagine the reception in the press that school would have had if it had been put in place by someone associated with the Labour Party - the strict uniforms, the shuffling along the corridors in silent single file, the ostracising of someone who didn't bring in their dinner money, the enforced praising of the school, each other and the staff, I can see screeching headlines of "Maoist Indoctrination Schools"

She has very close ties to that absolute headcase Braverman.

https://bylinetimes.com/2023/07/11/brav ... dmistress/

The roots of the Birbalsingh-Braverman partnership can be traced back just prior to the inception of the Michaela Community School Trust, in 2011. While most press accounts from the time indicate that the school was Birbalsingh’s idea, the involvement of Braverman from the school’s inception is very clear from Companies House records.

...

Braverman was one of the founding governors of the school. But the institutions’ ties to Braverman, and to the Conservatives, run deeper.

Backed by Braverman

The Michaela Community Schools Trust, which runs the Brent school and sixth form, was originally established without Birbalsingh listed as a director – but she soon officially came on board. Instead, the Trust originally listed among its directors Suella Braverman (then Sue-Ellen Fernandes), Sir Anthony Seldon, Dr Cleveland Anthony Sewell, and Indraneil Mahapatra, with Braverman, Mahapatra, and Sewell listed as shareholders.

Braverman’s mother, Uma Fernandes, was also listed as a director of the company between 2013-2014. The registered office address of the Michaela Community Schools Trust was, curiously, the same as Braverman’s listed address when the Trust was founded.

Braverman’s office did not respond to requests for comment on this, but a spokesperson for Birbalsingh said Braverman’s mother “gave out some flyers to help spread the word about the new school, so that parents knew they could apply.”

“At the time, Suella Fernandes [now Braverman] was a barrister and she was part of the steering group that set up the school. An address was needed for the company to be registered. She offered hers to use for that bureaucratic purpose,” the spokesperson added.
...

Building Blocks

Birbalsingh not only offered her support for Gove’s reforms but also defended him when he was fired from his position, accusing the Tories of “killing the goose that laid the golden eggs” of school reform.

The Michaela School received substantial funding from Gove’s department from its inception. As the Companies House documents reveal, the school received a standard academy capital grant from DfE, totalling £4.5 million at the time.

But despite the abundance of secondary schools in Brent, the Department for Education (DfE) also gifted the school its building. The DfE’s purchased a Wembley Park property for £8 million, which was subsequently transferred to Birbalsingh and Braverman’s institution without charge.

So, yeah. A Braverman acolyte. She's very anti-immigration, which is funny for the NEW ZEALAND BORN BRITISH-CANADIAN


Some more choice quotes.

In a 2021 interview with the libertarian magazine, Birbalsingh said: “I always used to say that the white working classes were the new black people.” And she approvingly quoted a claim that “to rise up in the civil service, people needed to be able to speak Latin by the watercooler.”

Other not-so-subtle hints at her stance include saying “the extreme left are the ones preventing disadvantaged children from succeeding” while claiming that “critical race theory” – the nemesis of the right-wing – is a “massive issue in the US but we are really fighting these things here. And we are winning.”

During her time as headteacher she has made comments that Shakespeare’s inclusion in the curriculum was under threat from cancel culture, argued that children are born with “original sin” and needed to be “habituated into choosing good over evil”, and said it was “natural” for girls to avoid taking physics.

Playing to the Gallery

And amid the recent manufactured outrage over false reports of children in schools “identifying as cats” – a thinly-veiled transphobic dog-whistle that originated in the US – Birbalsingh claimed that this was not an isolated incident. There was no evidence provided that any children had actually identified as a cat.

Speaking at the recent hardline National Conservative conference – a conference which also saw Jacob Rees-Mogg admit that mandatory voter ID was a form of “gerrymandering” to benefit the Conservatives – the Brent headteacher made the point that “there are kids right now, in some schools, with tails pinned to their heads and bottoms.. They identify as cats, you see.”

Birbalsingh told the Tory right’s gathering that it was important that schools “embrace small-c conservative values”, before going on to claim “the woke agenda” is as prevalent in state as in private schools. She accused both sectors of “peddling extreme leftist views”. Birbalsingh has since claimed on Twitter that the NatCon conference was non-party political.

Taking to X, the head teacher of the Michaela Community School in Wembley, said:

“They also deny furries exist in the UK. Meanwhile, loads of teachers have them in their classrooms. Snow leopards and pasta too. Yes, that’s a child identifying as pasta. I haven’t made that up. Just like I didn’t make up the existence of furries. I don’t make stuff up.”

We should definitely all listen to this deeply serious person.

[lemonhead]

It has to be said though, that behaviour in schools, particularly in Scotland, is at an all time low.

A huge chunk of that is to do with the lack of discipline in the home nowadays

Shitbag cunts create shitbag cunts.

I was once overseeing a lunchtime detention in a computer lab that was also a walkthrough to a couple of classrooms. This 14 year old boy, who is supposed to be sitting there in silence completing work or a detention task, catcalled a couple of girls from the year above as they walked through and couldn't understand why I gave him a bollocking for it. His justification was that his dad does it all the time.

Overheard one kid in class boasting to a classmate about not allowing a gas man into the house because he was a "darkie and we don't let fuckin' darkies in". Where do you think he gets that from?

A kid skipped lunchtime detention, so instantly got upgraded to after school. Skipped that too, so a phonecall to the parents who said they told him to skip it. They don't believe we have the right to keep kids after school, even though punishments and sanctions are part of the code of conduct all parents have to sign before their child took up their place at the scool...

One of the lunch ladies had a a right scrote of a son who was constantly getting into trouble for one thing or another and she was constantly griping at teachers about it. Eventually she got fired for storming into a lesson to confront a teacher who'd provided the evidence in an incident severe enough for a suspension.

Most memorable of all was a boy who got a roasting at a parents' evening from pretty much all his teachers, not because he was particularly poorly behaved, but he just refused to do any work, who came in the next day and smugly thanked a teacher for being so negative. Apparently it prompted his parents to buy him a new Xbox game as a pick me up.

And so on and so forth. It was so bloody draining to deal with. Sod beating the kids, it's the parents who need sorting out.

Never quite realised till I became a parent, but your kids are a bloody mirror.

In hindsight, who else are you going to pick up behavioral cues from. Don't like to think how many generations this shite gets passed down.

[Random1]

There isn't a far right grifter alive that you're not willing to deep throat. But hey, at least she's marginally better than your previous fave, Douglas Murray.

I have listened to her repeatedly, on TV, on twitter, in the papers, which is why I know she's a fucking moron and a raging bigot. She's an extremely stupid person's idea of a clever person.

Yeah, your definition of ‘far right’ is not exactly reliable.

Calling everyone that doesn’t agree with your position an idiot is just boring. We’ve had this conversation so many times.

I’ll say that you’re ad hominem attacking her and not dealing with her points (same as you do with Douglas).

You’ll then say I don’t know what ad hominem means.

I’ll say, yes I do, can you please engage with the point rather than the person.

You then tend to say there’s no point in debating stupid points.

I don't care if it bores you. I don't think people who follow Douglas Murray and his ilk are looking for actual conversation. Vile far right scumbags are not people you should be listening to, let alone repeatedly boosting on public forums. Your history of who you choose to listen to and promote says absolutely everything about you.

Birbalsingh is someone who, like her fan Jordan Peterson (who says she's more right wing and more conservative than him, btw), will say absolutely anything that sounds clever but doesn't hold up to scrutiny whatsoever. She peddles in the same shock-jock bigotry that appeals to a very small section of society. She's cut from the same cloth as Braverman and Badenoch, and the country has just rejected those sorts of grim charlatans who are willing to do anything and say anything if it gets them where they want to be in life. I have no idea if she's a true believer like Murray, or is just doing it for the attention and the rewards, but in my opinion there is no reason to care. Performativie bigotry is still bigotry. Whether she and other Spiked and Spectator lunatic opinionistas actually believe the shit they're peddling is deeply second to the fact that they say stupid, horrific, divisive crap for their own personal benefit on a regular basis.

These culture warriors are not your friends. They do not have anything useful to say about modern society. They are in fact not providing any sane answers or reasonable viewpoints. But no amount of her repeating the most blatantly obvious lies or coming out with the dumbest statements more regularly than trains to Waterloo will prevent a small but fanatical part of society - a part you appear to be in - of eagely gulping down what she's excreting without a second's critical though.

She has claimed that both private and state schools "peddle extreme leftist views" and that they are riddled with "the woke agenda". Claiming this while giving a speech at NatCon, a conference beloved by the far right, no less. That's the stuff she says when she's prepared! I won't even touch the incredibly stupid things she's said off the cuff in interviews and on twitter. You'd have to be braindead to take her seriously.

You do realise I don’t just read/watch right leaning things don’t you?

I also watch Navarro media I even tolerate a bit of Owen jones.

I try to get a balance on most things, because I’m not an ideologue.

The fact that the Overton window is now so skewed that you think someone talking discipline and meritocracy is a far right affiliate is more testament to your positioning than mine.

The main issue remains though; you’re yet to argue against any of her points. You’ve just highlighted her friends aren’t people you rate and you’ve quoted a few other things she’s said that you disagree with.

Yet again, you’ve not actually addressed any of the points she makes. Ad hominem. As usual.

[Random1]

Yeah, your definition of ‘far right’ is not exactly reliable.

Calling everyone that doesn’t agree with your position an idiot is just boring. We’ve had this conversation so many times.

I’ll say that you’re ad hominem attacking her and not dealing with her points (same as you do with Douglas).

You’ll then say I don’t know what ad hominem means.

I’ll say, yes I do, can you please engage with the point rather than the person.

You then tend to say there’s no point in debating stupid points.

I don't care if it bores you. I don't think people who follow Douglas Murray and his ilk are looking for actual conversation. Vile far right scumbags are not people you should be listening to, let alone repeatedly boosting on public forums. Your history of who you choose to listen to and promote says absolutely everything about you.

Birbalsingh is someone who, like her fan Jordan Peterson (who says she's more right wing and more conservative than him, btw), will say absolutely anything that sounds clever but doesn't hold up to scrutiny whatsoever. She peddles in the same shock-jock bigotry that appeals to a very small section of society. She's cut from the same cloth as Braverman and Badenoch, and the country has just rejected those sorts of grim charlatans who are willing to do anything and say anything if it gets them where they want to be in life. I have no idea if she's a true believer like Murray, or is just doing it for the attention and the rewards, but in my opinion there is no reason to care. Performativie bigotry is still bigotry. Whether she and other Spiked and Spectator lunatic opinionistas actually believe the shit they're peddling is deeply second to the fact that they say stupid, horrific, divisive crap for their own personal benefit on a regular basis.

These culture warriors are not your friends. They do not have anything useful to say about modern society. They are in fact not providing any sane answers or reasonable viewpoints. But no amount of her repeating the most blatantly obvious lies or coming out with the dumbest statements more regularly than trains to Waterloo will prevent a small but fanatical part of society - a part you appear to be in - of eagely gulping down what she's excreting without a second's critical though.

She has claimed that both private and state schools "peddle extreme leftist views" and that they are riddled with "the woke agenda". Claiming this while giving a speech at NatCon, a conference beloved by the far right, no less. That's the stuff she says when she's prepared! I won't even touch the incredibly stupid things she's said off the cuff in interviews and on twitter. You'd have to be braindead to take her seriously.

There seems to be a flailing around in desperation, trying to find some kind of intellectual basis to what is at its core is a regressive, divisive, insular view point. Peterson and Murray are certainly cut of that cloth, Bilbalsingh is new to me but seems to be following the same path.
Peterson in particular uses what appears to be deliberately opaque language to mask a stupid point, it's like QAnon for people who fancy themselves as intellectuals, but he does seem to impress some folk.

I had a look at the school Birbalsingh set up, I can only imagine the reception in the press that school would have had if it had been put in place by someone associated with the Labour Party - the strict uniforms, the shuffling along the corridors in silent single file, the ostracising of someone who didn't bring in their dinner money, the enforced praising of the school, each other and the staff, I can see screeching headlines of "Maoist Indoctrination Schools"

I agree on Peterson. But I try to give him leeway because he’s one of the few people trying to grapple with ‘why’ we’re in this position rather than just commenting on the position itself.

He always regresses to the nebulous, because trying to resolve consciousness and biology almost always ends with a religious slant.

I do agree with you on the political lens that if labour tried this, it’d be branded as authoritarian by some. But I think the majority of us normies would welcome it with open arms and be supportive, as most of plus aren’t ideologues, we just want our kids to grow up in a good environment that is sustainable and patriotic.

Thank you for at least engaging with what she was trying to say.

[JM2K6]

You do realise I don’t just read/watch right leaning things don’t you?

I also watch Navarro media I even tolerate a bit of Owen jones.

I try to get a balance on most things, because I’m not an ideologue.

Here's a thought: have you considered ingesting media that isn't produced by raving idiots and idealogues whose primary concerns are themselves? "But I also listen to Aaron Bastani and Owen Jones!" is not a flex. It's also meaningless when the only people you post on here and agree with are the lunatic fringe on the right. Why not avoid people like this? Why bother listening to the terminally disingenuous culture warriors of either side?

The fact that the Overton window is now so skewed that you think someone talking discipline and meritocracy is a far right affiliate is more testament to your positioning than mine.

Who she chooses to share a platform with, who she's rubbing shoulders with, the people who follow her and agree with her and boost her, AND her own public comments and beliefs are why I believe she's a "far right affiliate".

If you end up making a career out of giving speeches alongside the darlings of the far right, including the worst of the "Islam is taking over Europe and we need to make sure all Muslims leave the country" lot like Murray, if you hit every far right talking point, if you take every opportunity to dehumanise your opponents, decry & blame immigration and immigrants, and spread conspiracy theories exclusively for the benefit of the far right, then you run the risk of being labelled in that fashion. Do I think she's a card carrying member? Nah. She's just happy to agree with several high profile champions of the far right, happy to share a platform for them, and happy to take up several of their causes for her own ends. And she is deeply conservative and reactionary - this is explicitly true and acknowledged by her friends on the right - so it's not a huge leap for her to make.

You also don't understand what the Overton window is or how it's applied, but that's the least of your problems.

The main issue remains though; you’re yet to argue against any of her points. You’ve just highlighted her friends aren’t people you rate and you’ve quoted a few other things she’s said that you disagree with.

Yet again, you’ve not actually addressed any of the points she makes. Ad hominem. As usual.

Yet again you've missed the point. Nothing she says is worth taking at face value. She has proven herself to be deeply unreliable, wildly gullible, and frequently very loose with the truth. She's another raving idealogue in a sea full of them. Her public speeches repeat tired culture war nonsense that is of no value to anyone. Screeching about "far left ideology in schools" (LOL) and "extreme woke culture" is the argument of someone who has nothing to say and nothing to offer except hate and division. Fuck her, and fuck the people who boost her. And your history of posting videos by people like Peterson and Murray mean there is no benefit of the doubt given.

[JM2K6]

Thank you for at least engaging with what she was trying to say.

he says even less about what she was trying to say than I did.

[fishfoodie]

Credit where credit is due; the Police forces involved have done an excellent job identifying & bringing to Justice the worst of the scrotes, ~1,300 perpertrators, involved in inciting*, & committing this violence. The sentence today of 9 years for one of this scum who tried murdering a hotel full of people shows the fruit of their efforts, & they. deserve full praise.

* WIth the notable exceptions of those at the highest level, where they will need help from Politicians to bring these individuals to book

[epwc]

Its been down to political will I think, this would not have been dealt with as quickly or sensibly under the Tories. I think some of the sentences seem a little harsh, but they've achieved the desired result, no more white riots.

[dpedin]

Its been down to political will I think, this would not have been dealt with as quickly or sensibly under the Tories. I think some of the sentences seem a little harsh, but they've achieved the desired result, no more white riots.

I'm not sure the sentences have been harsh! Some of the twats who have been prosecuted have rap sheets as long as your arm and a long history of racial or sexist crimes, with a few kiddy fiddlers in there as well. All of this will have been taken into account when sentencing. It would appear that the riots were just a right wing clarion call for all their criminal, racist buddies to have a day of racist violence. We are lucky there wasnt more injuries and deaths - if that hotel had been set alight properly then we would have been looking at many deaths. I applaud the police for their response during the riots and following up tracking these bampots down and the Gov for ensuring they were dealt with quickly. At the end of the day it was the independent judiciary who decided on the sentences given not the politicians. As you say with a political will and leadership the system works well.

[Jethro]

Exactly

You need nuns mate, unleash those harpies on any kid and they will be shivering with fear within minutes

[epwc]

Nuns vs Rioters could be a fun film

[epwc]

Spoke to a few Clacton lads on site Friday, a few of them have chatted to Farage in the boozer. Good bloke according to them.

[Sandstorm]

Nuns vs Rioters could be a fun film

vs Predator and you’ve got a hit on your hands.

[epwc]

Lovely fella, true patriot:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cjdl5y3y3mvo

[TedMaul]

I’m ashamed to say I dwelt on the article just to stare at the police spokeswoman.

[epwc]

Why did he need a £770 knife? (I'll disregard your ogling)

[SaintK]

Talking of angry white men.
Should imagine that it will all go off in London tomorrow.

Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, better known as Tommy Robinson, has been charged with failing to provide the pin to his mobile phone under Schedule 7 of the Terrorism Act, Kent police said.
The charge is in relation to an incident in Folkestone on Sunday 28 July after officers stopped Robinson under Schedule 7 of the Terrorism Act 2000.
The PA news agency reports that Robinson has been bailed to appear at Westminster magistrates court on 13 November 2024.
Supporters of Robinsonare due to hold a demonstration on Saturday, which is expected to be met with a counter-protest from Stop the War campaigners.

[dpedin]

Talking of angry white men.
Should imagine that it will all go off in London tomorrow.

Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, better known as Tommy Robinson, has been charged with failing to provide the pin to his mobile phone under Schedule 7 of the Terrorism Act, Kent police said.
The charge is in relation to an incident in Folkestone on Sunday 28 July after officers stopped Robinson under Schedule 7 of the Terrorism Act 2000.
The PA news agency reports that Robinson has been bailed to appear at Westminster magistrates court on 13 November 2024.
Supporters of Robinsonare due to hold a demonstration on Saturday, which is expected to be met with a counter-protest from Stop the War campaigners.

Should he not be in jail already? He can join his fellow patriot Parslow!