The Brexit Thread
- Insane_Homer
- Posts: 5389
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:14 pm
- Location: Leafy Surrey
Just a gentle reminder, that what was advertised doesn't match what's being delivered.
“Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true.”
By all accounts Barnier and EU leaders are getting right pissed off with UK and failure to progress talks and are now at point where it is going to be very difficult for them to secure agreement for any deal across all their 27 members in time for end of the year. Apparently the UK Gov doesn't have bandwidth to deal with Brexit negotiations etc and the Coronavirus lock down etc at the same time. Blonde Bumblecunt and the Brexit Ultras are too busy trying to fend off or placate their back benchers who are getting very very pissed off with them. They either grow up, swallow pride and ask for extension to the transition period (might be difficult to persuade EU members now as they are not a happy bunch and UK credibility is rock bottom) or else its, the possible plan all along, a No Deal situation and all the misery that will bring in between the 2nd and 3rd wave of coronavirus. Couldn't really have ballsed this up any better really?
- fishfoodie
- Posts: 8219
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm
Why should the EU27 extend the transition period, into a new budget cycle, to which the UK has contributed nothing ?dpedin wrote: ↑Wed Nov 04, 2020 8:37 pm By all accounts Barnier and EU leaders are getting right pissed off with UK and failure to progress talks and are now at point where it is going to be very difficult for them to secure agreement for any deal across all their 27 members in time for end of the year. Apparently the UK Gov doesn't have bandwidth to deal with Brexit negotiations etc and the Coronavirus lock down etc at the same time. Blonde Bumblecunt and the Brexit Ultras are too busy trying to fend off or placate their back benchers who are getting very very pissed off with them. They either grow up, swallow pride and ask for extension to the transition period (might be difficult to persuade EU members now as they are not a happy bunch and UK credibility is rock bottom) or else its, the possible plan all along, a No Deal situation and all the misery that will bring in between the 2nd and 3rd wave of coronavirus. Couldn't really have ballsed this up any better really?
Why should they continue, when the UK is approving Laws they know breach International Law, & an agreement that the ink is barely dry on ?
- Insane_Homer
- Posts: 5389
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:14 pm
- Location: Leafy Surrey
https://www.express.co.uk/comment/expre ... ction-2020
If Biden wins UK will suffer badly - and it will be entirely because of ...
Spoiler
Show
REMAINERS
“Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true.”
- Hal Jordan
- Posts: 4154
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 12:48 pm
- Location: Sector 2814
Even when it was the bears I knew it was them!
I suspect you may be right! EU are now saying they can't get 27 members to sign off deal in time anyway. Now seems the UK is likely to cave and agree a deal that sees them become a 'rule taker' in order to get a deal. The EU will tie us up tighter than a gnats arse to avoid us going rogue and will demand repeal of elements of the IM Bill. ERG are going to go apeshit despite however the Blonde Bumbecunt might dress it up as. Cant see him lasting much beyond March/April. He will be in rehab by Easter.fishfoodie wrote: ↑Wed Nov 04, 2020 8:53 pmWhy should the EU27 extend the transition period, into a new budget cycle, to which the UK has contributed nothing ?dpedin wrote: ↑Wed Nov 04, 2020 8:37 pm By all accounts Barnier and EU leaders are getting right pissed off with UK and failure to progress talks and are now at point where it is going to be very difficult for them to secure agreement for any deal across all their 27 members in time for end of the year. Apparently the UK Gov doesn't have bandwidth to deal with Brexit negotiations etc and the Coronavirus lock down etc at the same time. Blonde Bumblecunt and the Brexit Ultras are too busy trying to fend off or placate their back benchers who are getting very very pissed off with them. They either grow up, swallow pride and ask for extension to the transition period (might be difficult to persuade EU members now as they are not a happy bunch and UK credibility is rock bottom) or else its, the possible plan all along, a No Deal situation and all the misery that will bring in between the 2nd and 3rd wave of coronavirus. Couldn't really have ballsed this up any better really?
Why should they continue, when the UK is approving Laws they know breach International Law, & an agreement that the ink is barely dry on ?
Are you selling Sage software?
Johnson was waiting to see if Trump won the election. If he had, he would have gone for no deal and got sold the house to Trump, concessions on everything, to get a high profile deal. With Biden looking like he's won, he has to go and take whatever scraps the EU will give him - probably enough to keep the ferries and planes flying, mutual recognition of phytosanitary and veterinary checks etc.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
- fishfoodie
- Posts: 8219
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm
and again I ask; why should the EU27 give the UK favorable concessions such as these ?Biffer wrote: ↑Fri Nov 06, 2020 11:26 am Johnson was waiting to see if Trump won the election. If he had, he would have gone for no deal and got sold the house to Trump, concessions on everything, to get a high profile deal. With Biden looking like he's won, he has to go and take whatever scraps the EU will give him - probably enough to keep the ferries and planes flying, mutual recognition of phytosanitary and veterinary checks etc.
The EU will just get demands from every other country that it has a deal with, to get the same recognition, & there's no fucking way that they want to do that.
Much as the EU has no reason to give a toss about UK trade being damaged, it doesn't want to put itself into the position where it can be blamed for food shortages in Britain.fishfoodie wrote: ↑Fri Nov 06, 2020 11:49 amand again I ask; why should the EU27 give the UK favorable concessions such as these ?Biffer wrote: ↑Fri Nov 06, 2020 11:26 am Johnson was waiting to see if Trump won the election. If he had, he would have gone for no deal and got sold the house to Trump, concessions on everything, to get a high profile deal. With Biden looking like he's won, he has to go and take whatever scraps the EU will give him - probably enough to keep the ferries and planes flying, mutual recognition of phytosanitary and veterinary checks etc.
The EU will just get demands from every other country that it has a deal with, to get the same recognition, & there's no fucking way that they want to do that.
The checks being mutual doesn't mean there won't be, it just means all the blame goes to the UK for not being able to handle checks at ports etc.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
I think Fishfoodie is right that the EU dont need but I think they will drive a hard bargain now to get a deal, they recognise the UK Gov has backed itself into a corner and has no viable exit strategy. However I do think there will be a deal but it will not prejudice any of the other EU trade deals, Blonde Bumblecunt is completely fecked! Even with a deal we are fecked for foreseeable future with checks etc at the borders, long queues at passport controls, increase price of products in the shops, lorries stuck in Kent, etc.
It's a win win for the EU as things stand, Bumblecunt cannot come out of this any other way except covered in shit, could not happen to a nicer person, we will very likely see Brexitears at the end of this.dpedin wrote: ↑Fri Nov 06, 2020 12:03 pm I think Fishfoodie is right that the EU dont need but I think they will drive a hard bargain now to get a deal, they recognise the UK Gov has backed itself into a corner and has no viable exit strategy. However I do think there will be a deal but it will not prejudice any of the other EU trade deals, Blonde Bumblecunt is completely fecked! Even with a deal we are fecked for foreseeable future with checks etc at the borders, long queues at passport controls, increase price of products in the shops, lorries stuck in Kent, etc.
I'm inclined to agree.dpedin wrote: ↑Fri Nov 06, 2020 12:03 pm I think Fishfoodie is right that the EU dont need but I think they will drive a hard bargain now to get a deal, they recognise the UK Gov has backed itself into a corner and has no viable exit strategy. However I do think there will be a deal but it will not prejudice any of the other EU trade deals, Blonde Bumblecunt is completely fecked! Even with a deal we are fecked for foreseeable future with checks etc at the borders, long queues at passport controls, increase price of products in the shops, lorries stuck in Kent, etc.
I don't think the UK has done anything to endear themselves to the EU: on the contrary, I think they have given the EU every justification to cast them off without a second's thought.
- fishfoodie
- Posts: 8219
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm
I thought it was notable that Barnier's briefing to the EU27 now has three outstanding issues; it used to be just 2, the LPF, & Fisheries; but since the UK reneged on the Withdrawal Agreement, the EU27 added Governance onto the list of issues to be resolved before any deal.Rinkals wrote: ↑Fri Nov 06, 2020 1:39 pmI'm inclined to agree.dpedin wrote: ↑Fri Nov 06, 2020 12:03 pm I think Fishfoodie is right that the EU dont need but I think they will drive a hard bargain now to get a deal, they recognise the UK Gov has backed itself into a corner and has no viable exit strategy. However I do think there will be a deal but it will not prejudice any of the other EU trade deals, Blonde Bumblecunt is completely fecked! Even with a deal we are fecked for foreseeable future with checks etc at the borders, long queues at passport controls, increase price of products in the shops, lorries stuck in Kent, etc.
I don't think the UK has done anything to endear themselves to the EU: on the contrary, I think they have given the EU every justification to cast them off without a second's thought.
They have a deep distrust of the Blonde Bumblecunt and the Brexit Ultras and will have them trussed up like chlorinated chickens in any deal!fishfoodie wrote: ↑Fri Nov 06, 2020 1:49 pmI thought it was notable that Barnier's briefing to the EU27 now has three outstanding issues; it used to be just 2, the LPF, & Fisheries; but since the UK reneged on the Withdrawal Agreement, the EU27 added Governance onto the list of issues to be resolved before any deal.Rinkals wrote: ↑Fri Nov 06, 2020 1:39 pmI'm inclined to agree.dpedin wrote: ↑Fri Nov 06, 2020 12:03 pm I think Fishfoodie is right that the EU dont need but I think they will drive a hard bargain now to get a deal, they recognise the UK Gov has backed itself into a corner and has no viable exit strategy. However I do think there will be a deal but it will not prejudice any of the other EU trade deals, Blonde Bumblecunt is completely fecked! Even with a deal we are fecked for foreseeable future with checks etc at the borders, long queues at passport controls, increase price of products in the shops, lorries stuck in Kent, etc.
I don't think the UK has done anything to endear themselves to the EU: on the contrary, I think they have given the EU every justification to cast them off without a second's thought.
-
- Posts: 3582
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 9:37 am
Makes it a lot easier because it means the fantasy of a post no deal deal with the US goes out the window. Now it'll be roll over to the EU, get a bad deal that's better than no deal because Biden's WH won't put up with this limit and specific illegality and everyone apart from the UK goes home.
Trump was never giving the UK good terms on a deal with the US. Trump's trade was purely transactional and about winning.
-
- Posts: 1731
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:49 pm
I like neeps wrote: ↑Sun Nov 08, 2020 1:45 pmMakes it a lot easier because it means the fantasy of a post no deal deal with the US goes out the window. Now it'll be roll over to the EU, get a bad deal that's better than no deal because Biden's WH won't put up with this limit and specific illegality and everyone apart from the UK goes home.
Trump was never giving the UK good terms on a deal with the US. Trump's trade was purely transactional and about winning.
Or the largest external trading partner will just continue being that.
The Biden win changes little in one respect - a comprehensive trade deal with the US is politically impossible in the UK because the US insists (to put it simply) its food and agri standards being accepted as equivalent in the other parties internal market.
-
- Posts: 2097
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 4:04 pm
I assume they were always just going to say they're in favour of cheap food, US standards are specified unlike the lawless EU provisions, and anyone against accepting the US deal hates the UK and/or is a traitor, and probably a remoaner
- Longshanks
- Posts: 573
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 6:52 pm
Pass the IM Bill, not only is the UK the bad guy internationally, risks deal with the US.
Withdraw bill, EU becomes bad guy if it sees through its "threat".
No brainer.
Withdraw bill, EU becomes bad guy if it sees through its "threat".
No brainer.
There wont be a trade deal with the USA either way - the IM bill, Biden being a plastic mick ETC are all irrelevant.Longshanks wrote: ↑Mon Nov 09, 2020 8:46 am Pass the IM Bill, not only is the UK the bad guy internationally, risks deal with the US.
Withdraw bill, EU becomes bad guy if it sees through its "threat".
No brainer.
- Longshanks
- Posts: 573
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 6:52 pm
Possibly. However US economy will need a boost after pandemic.tc27 wrote: ↑Mon Nov 09, 2020 9:40 amThere wont be a trade deal with the USA either way - the IM bill, Biden being a plastic mick ETC are all irrelevant.Longshanks wrote: ↑Mon Nov 09, 2020 8:46 am Pass the IM Bill, not only is the UK the bad guy internationally, risks deal with the US.
Withdraw bill, EU becomes bad guy if it sees through its "threat".
No brainer.
Point stands about who's bad guy though
-
- Posts: 2097
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 4:04 pm
What would the EU be doing that makes them the bad guy?Longshanks wrote: ↑Mon Nov 09, 2020 9:43 amPossibly. However US economy will need a boost after pandemic.tc27 wrote: ↑Mon Nov 09, 2020 9:40 amThere wont be a trade deal with the USA either way - the IM bill, Biden being a plastic mick ETC are all irrelevant.Longshanks wrote: ↑Mon Nov 09, 2020 8:46 am Pass the IM Bill, not only is the UK the bad guy internationally, risks deal with the US.
Withdraw bill, EU becomes bad guy if it sees through its "threat".
No brainer.
Point stands about who's bad guy though
- Longshanks
- Posts: 573
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 6:52 pm
Depriving NI of Wagonwheels and monster munch!Rhubarb & Custard wrote: ↑Mon Nov 09, 2020 9:59 amWhat would the EU be doing that makes them the bad guy?Longshanks wrote: ↑Mon Nov 09, 2020 9:43 amPossibly. However US economy will need a boost after pandemic.
Point stands about who's bad guy though
- Longshanks
- Posts: 573
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 6:52 pm
On the serious side
Boris claims WA undermines GFA by putting a border between NI and rUK.
If that is the case ( and I'm not saying it is) allow it to happen and prove it.
Ammend things after a no deal, not before.
Boris claims WA undermines GFA by putting a border between NI and rUK.
If that is the case ( and I'm not saying it is) allow it to happen and prove it.
Ammend things after a no deal, not before.
At some point the Blonde Bumblecunt and his Brexit Ultras will have to stop kicking the can down the road and face up to the lose:lose scenario they have created. Who do they piss off more? What political, social and economic price are they willing to pay for whatever form of Brexit they decide to pursue? How much in hock are they to their financial and political backers in UK and outside of the UK? Who and how much dirt do they have on the Blonde bumblecunt?Longshanks wrote: ↑Mon Nov 09, 2020 10:05 am On the serious side
Boris claims WA undermines GFA by putting a border between NI and rUK.
If that is the case ( and I'm not saying it is) allow it to happen and prove it.
Ammend things after a no deal, not before.
It really is a matter of how deep is the shit we are in and how much deeper are they going to make it. Even with a trade deal we will still see significant disruption to trade and a significant negative impact on our economy. Politically we have trashed most of our reputation and any goodwill with two of our largest trading partners the EU and the USA. We remain a laughing stock with the rest of the world - the soya sauce debacle was just a hoot! The election of Biden has brought the phoney world of Trump and the BB crashing down, truth and reality now seems the order of the day. The sunny uplands' if they ever existed, are many, many years away.
-
- Posts: 2097
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 4:04 pm
So nothing, or you're saying us leaving is on the EU so it's their fault anyway?Longshanks wrote: ↑Mon Nov 09, 2020 10:01 amDepriving NI of Wagonwheels and monster munch!Rhubarb & Custard wrote: ↑Mon Nov 09, 2020 9:59 amWhat would the EU be doing that makes them the bad guy?Longshanks wrote: ↑Mon Nov 09, 2020 9:43 am
Possibly. However US economy will need a boost after pandemic.
Point stands about who's bad guy though
- Longshanks
- Posts: 573
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 6:52 pm
A deal is still possible, though both sides still think the other will blink first, which probably means no deal is more likely.
Oh happy days
Oh happy days
- Longshanks
- Posts: 573
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 6:52 pm
What?Rhubarb & Custard wrote: ↑Mon Nov 09, 2020 10:33 amSo nothing, or you're saying us leaving is on the EU so it's their fault anyway?Longshanks wrote: ↑Mon Nov 09, 2020 10:01 amDepriving NI of Wagonwheels and monster munch!Rhubarb & Custard wrote: ↑Mon Nov 09, 2020 9:59 am
What would the EU be doing that makes them the bad guy?
I've said nothing of the sort.
Longshanks wrote: ↑Mon Nov 09, 2020 10:35 am A deal is still possible, though both sides still think the other will blink first, which probably means no deal is more likely.
Oh happy days
A deal is likely I think - the hardman language from both sides is mainly posturing for home audiences.
- Paddington Bear
- Posts: 5957
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:29 pm
- Location: Hertfordshire
Seems to me there will never be a better year to bury an unpopular deal.
Old men forget: yet all shall be forgot, But he'll remember with advantages, What feats he did that day
- Insane_Homer
- Posts: 5389
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:14 pm
- Location: Leafy Surrey
“Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true.”
Very true. If people voted Brexit for reasons like sovereignty or whatever, then fine, so be it but Leavers have slagged off the EU as the cause of all our problems for decades and now they complain when the EU concentrates on looking after its own interests. Get real.Rinkals wrote: ↑Fri Nov 06, 2020 1:39 pmI'm inclined to agree.dpedin wrote: ↑Fri Nov 06, 2020 12:03 pm I think Fishfoodie is right that the EU dont need but I think they will drive a hard bargain now to get a deal, they recognise the UK Gov has backed itself into a corner and has no viable exit strategy. However I do think there will be a deal but it will not prejudice any of the other EU trade deals, Blonde Bumblecunt is completely fecked! Even with a deal we are fecked for foreseeable future with checks etc at the borders, long queues at passport controls, increase price of products in the shops, lorries stuck in Kent, etc.
I don't think the UK has done anything to endear themselves to the EU: on the contrary, I think they have given the EU every justification to cast them off without a second's thought.
- Northern Lights
- Posts: 524
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 7:32 am
Actually the whole thing is wrong, if the UK leaves with No Deal they could if they so wish apply a 0% tariff to all soy sauce and it would just mean the Dutch end up competing on a level playing field with the Japanese or Chinese or anywhere else. What they cannot do under WTO rules is put punative rates on specific countries just because they dont like them.Openside wrote: ↑Sun Nov 01, 2020 7:44 pmYou have made two incorrect assumptions 1) that 6% tariff is cause for celebration and 2) That I have interpreted the data to say what I wanted it to. I was merely pointing out that Heinz was likely to to the benefactor if the facts were as you stated.Rinkals wrote: ↑Thu Oct 29, 2020 9:26 pmRight.
The important thing is not to look at what the data conveys, but to slant your eyes and reinterpret it so that it says what you want it to say and confirms your opinion.
It would seem that the prospect of imports attracting a 6% tariff is cause for celebration.
This is just something a friend told me, and I haven't fact checked it, so with that in mind -
I hear in addition that the UK doesn't have a port big enough to cope with world wide trade and will have to continue using Rotterdam
Oh sod it, I decided I should check it, this from the first search
Port of Rotterdam reveals scale of Brexit challenge
https://www.ft.com/content/b5ee770a-ced ... 1a884dd8c6
- Insane_Homer
- Posts: 5389
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:14 pm
- Location: Leafy Surrey
Brexit: Government's bill suffers heavy House of Lords defeat
Peers voted overwhelmingly to remove a section of the bill that would allow ministers to break international law - by 433 votes to 165.
“Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true.”
-
- Posts: 1731
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:49 pm
I hear in addition that the UK doesn't have a port big enough to cope with world wide trade and will have to continue using Rotterdam
Europe and the med itself completely relies on big boat deliver to small boat delivery in Rotterdam and Antwerp ..... This continues regardless of brexit.