Re: President Biden and US politics catchall
Posted: Fri Jun 09, 2023 7:54 pm
Civil war?
A place where escape goats go to play
https://notplanetrugby.com/
Talk about hoist by his own petard.“In my administration, I’m going to enforce all laws concerning the protection of classified information,” Trump said in August 2016. "No one will be above the law.”
“We can’t have someone in the Oval Office who doesn’t understand the meaning of the word confidential or classified,” Trump said in another campaign trail statement, according to the indictment.
Prison style !!Gumboot wrote: ↑Fri Jun 09, 2023 7:45 pmHe is sooo fucked.Trump “showed and described a ‘plan of attack’ that Trump said was prepared for him by the Department of Defense and a senior military official” during a meeting at the Trump national golf club in Bedminster, New Jersey, the indictment read.
It added: “Trump told the individuals that the plan was ‘highly confidential’ and ‘secret’.”
The indictment alleges that Trump also “endeavored to obstruct the FBI and grand jury investigations and conceal his continued retention of classified documents”.
The former president tried to obstruct justice via the government’s investigations including by “suggesting that his attorney falsely represent to the FBI and grand jury that [he] did not have documents called for by the grand jury subpoena” and even “suggesting that his attorney hide or destroy documents called for by the grand jury subpoena”.![]()
I'm on page 25 of 44, & I think it's much worse than I imagined, because I thought he'd do his usual trick of having loyal fools between him & the crime, & this time he doesn't !
Cheers!fishfoodie wrote: ↑Fri Jun 09, 2023 9:06 pmI'm on page 25 of 44, & I think it's much worse than I imagined, because I thought he'd do his usual trick of having loyal fools between him & the crime, & this time he doesn't !
The main focus is obviously on the obstruction, & that's why its the traitor, & a guy called Walt Nauta on the indictment.
He's fucked because the indictment describes the sequence where he gets the demand to produce any documents he's illegally holding, & "Lawyer 1" tells him that he, the lawyer, needs to go thru all the boxes brought down from the WH, & they agree, eventually he'll do that in ~10 days time.
The traitor then immediately tells Nauta to ferry over bunches of boxes to his residence so he can go thru them himself !!!!!
This happens, & he goes thru dozens of boxes in those days. I think this is how he ended up with so many classified docs in his own office.
When "Lawyer 1" eventually gets to lock him self in the storage room with the boxes the traitor had gone thru, he finds a grand total of 38 pages![]()
There are texts, & phone calls, & surveillance footage, & most importantly witnesses like the lawyers, & a maintenance man who corroborate all of this.
I WILL APPOINT A REAL SPECIAL ‘PROSECUTOR’ TO GO AFTER THE MOST CORRUPT PRESIDENT IN THE HISTORY OF THE USA, JOE BIDEN, THE ENTIRE BIDEN CRIME FAMILY, & ALL OTHERS INVOLVED WITH THE DESTRUCTION OF OUR ELECTIONS, BORDERS, & COUNTRY ITSELF!
According to the WaPo he's currently shitting himself, because he spent all day yesterday, the day before he gets charged with offences with ~100 years worth of penalty, trying to hire a trial lawyer !Kiwias wrote: ↑Tue Jun 13, 2023 2:31 am The Orange Turd is not a happy camper
I WILL APPOINT A REAL SPECIAL ‘PROSECUTOR’ TO GO AFTER THE MOST CORRUPT PRESIDENT IN THE HISTORY OF THE USA, JOE BIDEN, THE ENTIRE BIDEN CRIME FAMILY, & ALL OTHERS INVOLVED WITH THE DESTRUCTION OF OUR ELECTIONS, BORDERS, & COUNTRY ITSELF!
It will be very funny if he has to go to a state appointed attorneyfishfoodie wrote: ↑Tue Jun 13, 2023 10:44 amAccording to the WaPo he's currently shitting himself, because he spent all day yesterday, the day before he gets charged with offences with ~100 years worth of penalty, trying to hire a trial lawyer !Kiwias wrote: ↑Tue Jun 13, 2023 2:31 am The Orange Turd is not a happy camper
I WILL APPOINT A REAL SPECIAL ‘PROSECUTOR’ TO GO AFTER THE MOST CORRUPT PRESIDENT IN THE HISTORY OF THE USA, JOE BIDEN, THE ENTIRE BIDEN CRIME FAMILY, & ALL OTHERS INVOLVED WITH THE DESTRUCTION OF OUR ELECTIONS, BORDERS, & COUNTRY ITSELF!
And needless to say, he's already been turned down over the few days by most of the best ones available, because they all know he's a cunt, & losing a case won't do anything good for their image.
Not to mention that the fat turd will almost certainly stiff them on their bill for services rendered.fishfoodie wrote: ↑Tue Jun 13, 2023 10:44 amAccording to the WaPo he's currently shitting himself, because he spent all day yesterday, the day before he gets charged with offences with ~100 years worth of penalty, trying to hire a trial lawyer !Kiwias wrote: ↑Tue Jun 13, 2023 2:31 am The Orange Turd is not a happy camper
I WILL APPOINT A REAL SPECIAL ‘PROSECUTOR’ TO GO AFTER THE MOST CORRUPT PRESIDENT IN THE HISTORY OF THE USA, JOE BIDEN, THE ENTIRE BIDEN CRIME FAMILY, & ALL OTHERS INVOLVED WITH THE DESTRUCTION OF OUR ELECTIONS, BORDERS, & COUNTRY ITSELF!
And needless to say, he's already been turned down over the few days by most of the best ones available, because they all know he's a cunt, & losing a case won't do anything good for their image.
Very likely !Kiwias wrote: ↑Tue Jun 13, 2023 11:03 amNot to mention that the fat turd will almost certainly stiff them on their bill for services rendered.fishfoodie wrote: ↑Tue Jun 13, 2023 10:44 amAccording to the WaPo he's currently shitting himself, because he spent all day yesterday, the day before he gets charged with offences with ~100 years worth of penalty, trying to hire a trial lawyer !
And needless to say, he's already been turned down over the few days by most of the best ones available, because they all know he's a cunt, & losing a case won't do anything good for their image.
Most judges wouldn't allow it, but is that cannon?fishfoodie wrote: ↑Tue Jun 13, 2023 12:36 pmVery likely !Kiwias wrote: ↑Tue Jun 13, 2023 11:03 amNot to mention that the fat turd will almost certainly stiff them on their bill for services rendered.fishfoodie wrote: ↑Tue Jun 13, 2023 10:44 am
According to the WaPo he's currently shitting himself, because he spent all day yesterday, the day before he gets charged with offences with ~100 years worth of penalty, trying to hire a trial lawyer !
And needless to say, he's already been turned down over the few days by most of the best ones available, because they all know he's a cunt, & losing a case won't do anything good for their image.
A lot of experts also point out that once a lawyer does sign up, there's zero chance the Judge will let them ditch him, regardless of how badly he behaves, because the Judge won't want the trial to drag on forever; so once you're in, you're in for keeps
No, it's up to the Judge; but the experts reckon that Judges just don't like lawyers playing this particular game, to delay, as it fucks with the Judges docket, & immediately a new lawyer comes in, they're going to demand time to get up to speed, etc, etc & we're already talking about a 78 year old on trial, with no decision before the election.Rhubarb & Custard wrote: ↑Wed Jun 14, 2023 9:58 amMost judges wouldn't allow it, but is that cannon?fishfoodie wrote: ↑Tue Jun 13, 2023 12:36 pmVery likely !
A lot of experts also point out that once a lawyer does sign up, there's zero chance the Judge will let them ditch him, regardless of how badly he behaves, because the Judge won't want the trial to drag on forever; so once you're in, you're in for keeps
The thing here is the judge might want to run the clock out, leaving the prosecution chanting c'mon Aileen but in essence spinning their wheelsfishfoodie wrote: ↑Wed Jun 14, 2023 4:16 pmNo, it's up to the Judge; but the experts reckon that Judges just don't like lawyers playing this particular game, to delay, as it fucks with the Judges docket, & immediately a new lawyer comes in, they're going to demand time to get up to speed, etc, etc & we're already talking about a 78 year old on trial, with no decision before the election.Rhubarb & Custard wrote: ↑Wed Jun 14, 2023 9:58 amMost judges wouldn't allow it, but is that cannon?fishfoodie wrote: ↑Tue Jun 13, 2023 12:36 pm
Very likely !
A lot of experts also point out that once a lawyer does sign up, there's zero chance the Judge will let them ditch him, regardless of how badly he behaves, because the Judge won't want the trial to drag on forever; so once you're in, you're in for keeps
If she doesn't recuse, after being bitch slapped by her appeal court superiors (all Republicans), then I think the Feds will appeal, & she'll be replaced by a more senior Judge (who will also be a Republican, but probably appointed by W)Rhubarb & Custard wrote: ↑Wed Jun 14, 2023 4:22 pmThe thing here is the judge might want to run the clock out, leaving the prosecution chanting c'mon Aileen but in essence spinning their wheelsfishfoodie wrote: ↑Wed Jun 14, 2023 4:16 pmNo, it's up to the Judge; but the experts reckon that Judges just don't like lawyers playing this particular game, to delay, as it fucks with the Judges docket, & immediately a new lawyer comes in, they're going to demand time to get up to speed, etc, etc & we're already talking about a 78 year old on trial, with no decision before the election.Rhubarb & Custard wrote: ↑Wed Jun 14, 2023 9:58 am
Most judges wouldn't allow it, but is that cannon?
I hope she does recuse, but if she didn't I could also easily see judges say having a ruling overturned on appeal doesn't mean a judge is biased, even when the standard is only a judge must recuse if there's an appearance of biasfishfoodie wrote: ↑Wed Jun 14, 2023 5:36 pmIf she doesn't recuse, after being bitch slapped by her appeal court superiors (all Republicans), then I think the Feds will appeal, & she'll be replaced by a more senior Judge (who will also be a Republican, but probably appointed by W)Rhubarb & Custard wrote: ↑Wed Jun 14, 2023 4:22 pmThe thing here is the judge might want to run the clock out, leaving the prosecution chanting c'mon Aileen but in essence spinning their wheelsfishfoodie wrote: ↑Wed Jun 14, 2023 4:16 pm
No, it's up to the Judge; but the experts reckon that Judges just don't like lawyers playing this particular game, to delay, as it fucks with the Judges docket, & immediately a new lawyer comes in, they're going to demand time to get up to speed, etc, etc & we're already talking about a 78 year old on trial, with no decision before the election.
But it was the early days of THIS CASE !, & the appeal was granted because the appeal court stated that she had no right to interfere in the lawful execution of subpoena, & then she compounded this by saying that because the orange traitor was an ex-President, that he somehow deserved a different form of justice.Rhubarb & Custard wrote: ↑Thu Jun 15, 2023 7:40 amI hope she does recuse, but if she didn't I could also easily see judges say having a ruling overturned on appeal doesn't mean a judge is biased, even when the standard is only a judge must recuse if there's an appearance of biasfishfoodie wrote: ↑Wed Jun 14, 2023 5:36 pmIf she doesn't recuse, after being bitch slapped by her appeal court superiors (all Republicans), then I think the Feds will appeal, & she'll be replaced by a more senior Judge (who will also be a Republican, but probably appointed by W)Rhubarb & Custard wrote: ↑Wed Jun 14, 2023 4:22 pm
The thing here is the judge might want to run the clock out, leaving the prosecution chanting c'mon Aileen but in essence spinning their wheels
And tbh there are plenty of bat shit crazy judges, you could easily get another loon
I would in all this like to know how much the deck was stacked when she was randomly selected, as a point of interest if nothing else
I'm just not sold it follows that because a person has previously been shown to act in bad faith it'll they'll subsequently act in good faith.fishfoodie wrote: ↑Thu Jun 15, 2023 8:28 amBut it was the early days of THIS CASE !, & the appeal was granted because the appeal court stated that she had no right to interfere in the lawful execution of subpoena, & then she compounded this by saying that because the orange traitor was an ex-President, that he somehow deserved a different form of justice.Rhubarb & Custard wrote: ↑Thu Jun 15, 2023 7:40 amI hope she does recuse, but if she didn't I could also easily see judges say having a ruling overturned on appeal doesn't mean a judge is biased, even when the standard is only a judge must recuse if there's an appearance of biasfishfoodie wrote: ↑Wed Jun 14, 2023 5:36 pm
If she doesn't recuse, after being bitch slapped by her appeal court superiors (all Republicans), then I think the Feds will appeal, & she'll be replaced by a more senior Judge (who will also be a Republican, but probably appointed by W)
And tbh there are plenty of bat shit crazy judges, you could easily get another loon
I would in all this like to know how much the deck was stacked when she was randomly selected, as a point of interest if nothing else
She's already shown bias, & her desire to should favouritism to the defendant.