Page 158 of 213

Re: The Official Cricket Thread

Posted: Thu Jul 06, 2023 3:45 pm
by Thor Sedan
It is quite frightening that England could have had Wood and Archer bowling in tandem.

Re: The Official Cricket Thread

Posted: Thu Jul 06, 2023 3:49 pm
by JM2K6
Wood, Archer, Stone...

Re: The Official Cricket Thread

Posted: Thu Jul 06, 2023 3:52 pm
by Hal Jordan
Seeing a seriously fast bowler destroying the tail is a great Test spectacle (unless it happens to your team).

If only Wood could stay fit.

Re: The Official Cricket Thread

Posted: Thu Jul 06, 2023 3:55 pm
by Paddington Bear
90mph plus bowling is truly one of the great spectacles in sport.

Re: The Official Cricket Thread

Posted: Thu Jul 06, 2023 4:26 pm
by JM2K6
Hands up everyone who's surprised Harry Brook looked completely out of his depth at 3? Not you, Baz.

Re: The Official Cricket Thread

Posted: Thu Jul 06, 2023 4:43 pm
by Torquemada 1420
Paddington Bear wrote: Thu Jul 06, 2023 2:34 pm
Torquemada 1420 wrote: Thu Jul 06, 2023 2:25 pm
Paddington Bear wrote: Thu Jul 06, 2023 2:17 pm This is becoming incredibly hard to watch
Big problems for Eng now with Robinson off and Moeen getting slaughtered. Root on next over?
Ali is an absolute liability, as is Bairstow’s keeping. Looks ominous
In keeping with the spirit of the series, the batsmen oblige by giving their wickets away!

Re: The Official Cricket Thread

Posted: Thu Jul 06, 2023 4:46 pm
by Kawazaki
Paddington Bear wrote: Thu Jul 06, 2023 3:55 pm 90mph plus bowling is truly one of the great spectacles in sport.


Imagine what it must have been like in the 70s and 80s facing the West Indies on dry tracks. :wtf:

Re: The Official Cricket Thread

Posted: Thu Jul 06, 2023 5:03 pm
by Torquemada 1420
Thor Sedan wrote: Thu Jul 06, 2023 3:45 pm It is quite frightening that England could have had Wood and Archer bowling in tandem.
Archer is a perma-sick note so that really is theoretical.

Re: The Official Cricket Thread

Posted: Thu Jul 06, 2023 5:07 pm
by Torquemada 1420
Kawazaki wrote: Thu Jul 06, 2023 4:46 pm
Paddington Bear wrote: Thu Jul 06, 2023 3:55 pm 90mph plus bowling is truly one of the great spectacles in sport.


Imagine what it must have been like in the 70s and 80s facing the West Indies on dry tracks. :wtf:
Sabina or Perth in the old days!

Re: The Official Cricket Thread

Posted: Thu Jul 06, 2023 5:11 pm
by Paddington Bear
Kawazaki wrote: Thu Jul 06, 2023 4:46 pm
Paddington Bear wrote: Thu Jul 06, 2023 3:55 pm 90mph plus bowling is truly one of the great spectacles in sport.


Imagine what it must have been like in the 70s and 80s facing the West Indies on dry tracks. :wtf:
No or poor quality helmets as well. Genuinely terrifying

Re: The Official Cricket Thread

Posted: Fri Jul 07, 2023 7:17 am
by Torquemada 1420
Paddington Bear wrote: Thu Jul 06, 2023 5:11 pm
Kawazaki wrote: Thu Jul 06, 2023 4:46 pm
Paddington Bear wrote: Thu Jul 06, 2023 3:55 pm 90mph plus bowling is truly one of the great spectacles in sport.


Imagine what it must have been like in the 70s and 80s facing the West Indies on dry tracks. :wtf:
No or poor quality helmets as well. Genuinely terrifying
As I repeatedly point out, the likes of Zaheer and Lloyd were both tall men who batted with no helmets, wore glasses and faced the quickest bowlers the world has seen. Ditto helmetless "Magic" Khan who simply smiled at the Windies express men and plundered them for runs. The advent of the helmet was a necessary safety intervention (although not mandatory.......) but since it's arrival, batting techniques have plummeted against genuine quicks. Batsmen no longer keep their eyes on the ball. The old ability to bend inside or outside the line of a bumper has gone. And with it, we see far more batters hit facing equivalent short balls than before. Whilst this doesn't matter physically (rather that than Gatting v Marshall), it means they get out to the short stuff more often and that has been a real theme this series.

Re: The Official Cricket Thread

Posted: Fri Jul 07, 2023 9:26 am
by Paddington Bear
Torquemada 1420 wrote: Fri Jul 07, 2023 7:17 am
Paddington Bear wrote: Thu Jul 06, 2023 5:11 pm
Kawazaki wrote: Thu Jul 06, 2023 4:46 pm



Imagine what it must have been like in the 70s and 80s facing the West Indies on dry tracks. :wtf:
No or poor quality helmets as well. Genuinely terrifying
As I repeatedly point out, the likes of Zaheer and Lloyd were both tall men who batted with no helmets, wore glasses and faced the quickest bowlers the world has seen. Ditto helmetless "Magic" Khan who simply smiled at the Windies express men and plundered them for runs. The advent of the helmet was a necessary safety intervention (although not mandatory.......) but since it's arrival, batting techniques have plummeted against genuine quicks. Batsmen no longer keep their eyes on the ball. The old ability to bend inside or outside the line of a bumper has gone. And with it, we see far more batters hit facing equivalent short balls than before. Whilst this doesn't matter physically (rather that than Gatting v Marshall), it means they get out to the short stuff more often and that has been a real theme this series.
Yeah I agree with this. Old cricket is far more watchable and recognisable than old football and rugby (if you stuck the West Indians of the 80s into a modern test they’d still be good without having to adjust their game radically. Someone like Barry John or George Best would of course still be top class now but they’d have to adjust everything about how they played). Probably the two biggest changes are ground fielding, if anything slip fielding generally seems better back in the day, and how people play short pitched bowling.

Re: getting out to the short ball, the risk/reward has changed. If you take it on, you’re probably not going to get badly hurt, and you’ve got a much more powerful bat and the boundary is in from the fence, giving you a much better chance of hitting it for 4/6 than was true 40 odd years ago.

Re: The Official Cricket Thread

Posted: Fri Jul 07, 2023 9:30 am
by OomStruisbaai
Paddington Bear wrote: Fri Jul 07, 2023 9:26 am
Torquemada 1420 wrote: Fri Jul 07, 2023 7:17 am
Paddington Bear wrote: Thu Jul 06, 2023 5:11 pm

No or poor quality helmets as well. Genuinely terrifying
As I repeatedly point out, the likes of Zaheer and Lloyd were both tall men who batted with no helmets, wore glasses and faced the quickest bowlers the world has seen. Ditto helmetless "Magic" Khan who simply smiled at the Windies express men and plundered them for runs. The advent of the helmet was a necessary safety intervention (although not mandatory.......) but since it's arrival, batting techniques have plummeted against genuine quicks. Batsmen no longer keep their eyes on the ball. The old ability to bend inside or outside the line of a bumper has gone. And with it, we see far more batters hit facing equivalent short balls than before. Whilst this doesn't matter physically (rather that than Gatting v Marshall), it means they get out to the short stuff more often and that has been a real theme this series.
Yeah I agree with this. Old cricket is far more watchable and recognisable than old football and rugby (if you stuck the West Indians of the 80s into a modern test they’d still be good without having to adjust their game radically. Someone like Barry John or George Best would of course still be top class now but they’d have to adjust everything about how they played). Probably the two biggest changes are ground fielding, if anything slip fielding generally seems better back in the day, and how people play short pitched bowling.

Re: getting out to the short ball, the risk/reward has changed. If you take it on, you’re probably not going to get badly hurt, and you’ve got a much more powerful bat and the boundary is in from the fence, giving you a much better chance of hitting it for 4/6 than was true 40 odd years ago.
That bring us to the short ball tactic previous test. Batting without a helmet forced you to play the hook and pull well.

Re: The Official Cricket Thread

Posted: Fri Jul 07, 2023 9:53 am
by JM2K6
Sky discussing Bairstow with a montage labelled "Bairstow mixed series". Mixed? It was about 18 different fuckups.

Re: The Official Cricket Thread

Posted: Fri Jul 07, 2023 9:59 am
by Gumboot
JM2K6 wrote: Fri Jul 07, 2023 9:53 am Sky discussing Bairstow with a montage labelled "Bairstow mixed series". Mixed? It was about 18 different fuckups.
As expected, leaving Foakes out has come back to bite them on the arse. The gulf in talent between Carey and Bairstow has been costly.

Re: The Official Cricket Thread

Posted: Fri Jul 07, 2023 10:13 am
by Kiwias
Root gets England off to the worst possible start.

Re: The Official Cricket Thread

Posted: Fri Jul 07, 2023 10:27 am
by Gumboot
Catches win matches.

Re: The Official Cricket Thread

Posted: Fri Jul 07, 2023 10:28 am
by Kiwias
JM2K6 wrote: Fri Jul 07, 2023 9:53 am Sky discussing Bairstow with a montage labelled "Bairstow mixed series". Mixed? It was about 18 different fuckups.
Make that 19

Re: The Official Cricket Thread

Posted: Fri Jul 07, 2023 10:29 am
by Paddington Bear
We’re not getting close here, are we

Re: The Official Cricket Thread

Posted: Fri Jul 07, 2023 10:42 am
by Sandstorm
Paddington Bear wrote: Fri Jul 07, 2023 10:29 am We’re not getting close here, are we
Follow-on beckons......

Re: The Official Cricket Thread

Posted: Fri Jul 07, 2023 10:43 am
by Thor Sedan
Sandstorm wrote: Fri Jul 07, 2023 10:42 am
Paddington Bear wrote: Fri Jul 07, 2023 10:29 am We’re not getting close here, are we
Follow-on beckons......
Superman Stokes is in.....you'll be 100 ahead by Tea.

Re: The Official Cricket Thread

Posted: Fri Jul 07, 2023 10:45 am
by Sandstorm
Cricinfo ad feeds are showing lots of teenage girls wearing tiny outfits from Newlook (I went looking for a sunhat for the wife on there yesterday) - not a good look in the office today..... :cry:

Re: The Official Cricket Thread

Posted: Fri Jul 07, 2023 10:45 am
by JM2K6
Been busy since 11 so assuming we've kicked on and are looking to hammer home our advanta- oh. I see.

Bairstow is averaging 27 this series with the bat btw.

Re: The Official Cricket Thread

Posted: Fri Jul 07, 2023 10:49 am
by JM2K6


:clap:

Re: The Official Cricket Thread

Posted: Fri Jul 07, 2023 10:54 am
by Thor Sedan
JM2K6 wrote: Fri Jul 07, 2023 10:49 am

:clap:
Hee.

Re: The Official Cricket Thread

Posted: Fri Jul 07, 2023 11:17 am
by Big D
JM2K6 wrote: Fri Jul 07, 2023 10:45 am Been busy since 11 so assuming we've kicked on and are looking to hammer home our advanta- oh. I see.

Bairstow is averaging 27 this series with the bat btw.
His place would be untenable if they weren't so stubborn.

Re: The Official Cricket Thread

Posted: Fri Jul 07, 2023 11:18 am
by Insane_Homer
Where is Bazball now :yawn:

Re: The Official Cricket Thread

Posted: Fri Jul 07, 2023 11:21 am
by JM2K6
Big D wrote: Fri Jul 07, 2023 11:17 am
JM2K6 wrote: Fri Jul 07, 2023 10:45 am Been busy since 11 so assuming we've kicked on and are looking to hammer home our advanta- oh. I see.

Bairstow is averaging 27 this series with the bat btw.
His place would be untenable if they weren't so stubborn.
Yup. And that average is heavily boosted by the 77 he scored before he had to do any keeping.

Re: The Official Cricket Thread

Posted: Fri Jul 07, 2023 11:45 am
by Paddington Bear
Apologies to the table on the West Coast Main Line I have just punched, but FUCK ME is there any danger of us putting any thought into our cricket this series? Just a massive fuck you from the side to everyone who is emotionally invested in it

Re: The Official Cricket Thread

Posted: Fri Jul 07, 2023 11:52 am
by Hal Jordan
And now Woakes has been hit on the head.

It's the 90s all over again! Win other series, shit our pants in The Ashes.

Re: The Official Cricket Thread

Posted: Fri Jul 07, 2023 12:00 pm
by Thor Sedan
Let the Stokes fireworks commence.

Re: The Official Cricket Thread

Posted: Fri Jul 07, 2023 12:00 pm
by Insane_Homer
Aus could end up with a 100 run lead :shock:

Re: The Official Cricket Thread

Posted: Fri Jul 07, 2023 12:03 pm
by Sandstorm
Thor Sedan wrote: Fri Jul 07, 2023 12:00 pm Let the Stokes fireworks commence.
He can barely walk.

Re: The Official Cricket Thread

Posted: Fri Jul 07, 2023 12:19 pm
by Thor Sedan
Sandstorm wrote: Fri Jul 07, 2023 12:03 pm
Thor Sedan wrote: Fri Jul 07, 2023 12:00 pm Let the Stokes fireworks commence.
He can barely walk.
Danger of wounded animals and all that.

Re: The Official Cricket Thread

Posted: Fri Jul 07, 2023 12:52 pm
by Sandstorm
Wood caught going for a hook shot too. He's only just re-joined the team.

These Poms are not well-coached.

Re: The Official Cricket Thread

Posted: Fri Jul 07, 2023 12:57 pm
by Sandstorm
Thor Sedan wrote: Fri Jul 07, 2023 12:19 pm
Sandstorm wrote: Fri Jul 07, 2023 12:03 pm
Thor Sedan wrote: Fri Jul 07, 2023 12:00 pm Let the Stokes fireworks commence.
He can barely walk.
Danger of wounded animals and all that.
3 x 4s in a row from the big bat of the Ginger Poach

Re: The Official Cricket Thread

Posted: Fri Jul 07, 2023 12:58 pm
by clydecloggie
Sandstorm wrote: Fri Jul 07, 2023 12:52 pm Wood caught going for a hook shot too. He's only just re-joined the team.

These Poms are not well-coached.
24 off 8. Trying to hit everything out of the park. Maybe we should just give up and play the Ashes over 5 T20's?

Re: The Official Cricket Thread

Posted: Fri Jul 07, 2023 12:59 pm
by JM2K6
Not going to criticise Wood - he can hit quick runs and he hit quick runs. First bit of momentum we've had since the Aussies were batting.

Re: The Official Cricket Thread

Posted: Fri Jul 07, 2023 1:02 pm
by clydecloggie
JM2K6 wrote: Fri Jul 07, 2023 12:59 pm Not going to criticise Wood - he can hit quick runs and he hit quick runs. First bit of momentum we've had since the Aussies were batting.
It's the quintessential cameo but is it really what's needed just now? It's a hard and true pitch, sun's shining - maybe hang around and support Stokes for an hour or so?

Re: The Official Cricket Thread

Posted: Fri Jul 07, 2023 1:05 pm
by JM2K6
clydecloggie wrote: Fri Jul 07, 2023 1:02 pm
JM2K6 wrote: Fri Jul 07, 2023 12:59 pm Not going to criticise Wood - he can hit quick runs and he hit quick runs. First bit of momentum we've had since the Aussies were batting.
It's the quintessential cameo but is it really what's needed just now? It's a hard and true pitch, sun's shining - maybe hang around and support Stokes for an hour or so?
Wood isn't a batsman who can hang around, he doesn't have the defence for it. He's a hitter. And he's not batted for a long time. All of a sudden we're up to nearly 200 and within sight of their score.

No guarantee an injured Stokes can carry the innings, either. Although if the Aussies drop him like that...


edit: Woakes and Ali have a lot more blame to carry for their shots. They can bat properly and can hang around.