The Official Cricket Thread

Where goats go to escape
inactionman
Posts: 3398
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 7:37 am

All this over a few cricket matches.
Deepsouth
Posts: 408
Joined: Sat May 28, 2022 2:25 am

Biffer wrote: Mon Aug 07, 2023 7:27 am Is the 14 year old about to pretend he’s served in the military?
I don't pretend. You and your English mate on the other hand....
Deepsouth
Posts: 408
Joined: Sat May 28, 2022 2:25 am

JM2K6 wrote: Mon Aug 07, 2023 7:23 am The only thing you've served is undercooked shrimp, you absolute fantasist.
Hmmmm. You questioned my credentials. Let's see yours big man. Or is it Dunkirk all over again lol......
...
TedMaul
Posts: 442
Joined: Thu Jul 01, 2021 12:19 pm

Horrifying to witness the first recorded case of Post Traumatic Ashes Disorder.
My sympathy is with his Mum and all her man ‘friends’’
User avatar
SaintK
Posts: 7162
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 7:49 am
Location: Over there somewhere

FFS stop replying to the trolling piece of shit.
Deepsouth
Posts: 408
Joined: Sat May 28, 2022 2:25 am

SaintK wrote: Mon Aug 07, 2023 9:05 am FFS stop replying to the trolling piece of shit.
Truth hurts doesn't it bro :lol:
inactionman
Posts: 3398
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 7:37 am

A tie in the Hundred last night. Rare in any form of the game.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/cricket/66424379

I know it gets a kicking but I'm prepared to give it the benefit of the doubt, I'm hoping there are fewer blowouts than last season as teams get used to the concept and tactics.

The colour scheme still hurt my eyes though, and I think it might be damaging my TV.
User avatar
JM2K6
Posts: 10127
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2020 10:43 am

Deepsouth wrote: Mon Aug 07, 2023 8:38 am
JM2K6 wrote: Mon Aug 07, 2023 7:23 am The only thing you've served is undercooked shrimp, you absolute fantasist.
Hmmmm. You questioned my credentials. Let's see yours big man. Or is it Dunkirk all over again lol......
...
Hey I realise this is Your Thing and all, but... what credentials? I'm not claiming to have been in the armed forces. You're the absolute dweeb who tried to defend his habit of playing the big man on the internet only to run away at the first sign of danger by claiming you're some armed forces hard nut. No-one actually gives a shit - half the people on this board have a military background and somehow none of them are a gigantic squalling pissbaby, except you. And the other half are, to a man, better people than you anyway.

Honestly, it's absolutely baffling - do you honestly think anyone reads your drivel and goes "oh, he's in the military, that means this battery of whinging conspiracist lunacy has some justification"? Unless you have PTSD brought on by an IED made from a box of cricket balls, the simple answer is that you're just a deeply sad individual who dishes it out and cannot for a second take it. You've humiliated yourself time and again on here - word to the wise, you're better off just doing your disappearing act, which you're quite good at, and making it stick this time. No-one likes you, no-one thinks you're funny or smart, and definitely no-one is impressed by your rambling about the military. True or not, it doesn't mean you're not a chickenshit moron.

But hey, maybe you are some military bigshot. In which case, show your CO your posts on this forum. I'm sure he'll be fucking ecstatic :thumbup:
Deepsouth
Posts: 408
Joined: Sat May 28, 2022 2:25 am

JM2K6 wrote: Mon Aug 07, 2023 12:05 pm
Deepsouth wrote: Mon Aug 07, 2023 8:38 am
JM2K6 wrote: Mon Aug 07, 2023 7:23 am The only thing you've served is undercooked shrimp, you absolute fantasist.
Hmmmm. You questioned my credentials. Let's see yours big man. Or is it Dunkirk all over again lol......
...
Hey I realise this is Your Thing and all, but... what credentials? I'm not claiming to have been in the armed forces. You're the absolute dweeb who tried to defend his habit of playing the big man on the internet only to run away at the first sign of danger by claiming you're some armed forces hard nut. No-one actually gives a shit - half the people on this board have a military background and somehow none of them are a gigantic squalling pissbaby, except you. And the other half are, to a man, better people than you anyway.

Honestly, it's absolutely baffling - do you honestly think anyone reads your drivel and goes "oh, he's in the military, that means this battery of whinging conspiracist lunacy has some justification"? Unless you have PTSD brought on by an IED made from a box of cricket balls, the simple answer is that you're just a deeply sad individual who dishes it out and cannot for a second take it. You've humiliated yourself time and again on here - word to the wise, you're better off just doing your disappearing act, which you're quite good at, and making it stick this time. No-one likes you, no-one thinks you're funny or smart, and definitely no-one is impressed by your rambling about the military. True or not, it doesn't mean you're not a chickenshit moron.

But hey, maybe you are some military bigshot. In which case, show your CO your posts on this forum. I'm sure he'll be fucking ecstatic :thumbup:
Yup. That's what I thought a parasitic coward.....
User avatar
JM2K6
Posts: 10127
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2020 10:43 am

Deepsouth wrote: Mon Aug 07, 2023 12:12 pm
JM2K6 wrote: Mon Aug 07, 2023 12:05 pm
Deepsouth wrote: Mon Aug 07, 2023 8:38 am

Hmmmm. You questioned my credentials. Let's see yours big man. Or is it Dunkirk all over again lol......
...
Hey I realise this is Your Thing and all, but... what credentials? I'm not claiming to have been in the armed forces. You're the absolute dweeb who tried to defend his habit of playing the big man on the internet only to run away at the first sign of danger by claiming you're some armed forces hard nut. No-one actually gives a shit - half the people on this board have a military background and somehow none of them are a gigantic squalling pissbaby, except you. And the other half are, to a man, better people than you anyway.

Honestly, it's absolutely baffling - do you honestly think anyone reads your drivel and goes "oh, he's in the military, that means this battery of whinging conspiracist lunacy has some justification"? Unless you have PTSD brought on by an IED made from a box of cricket balls, the simple answer is that you're just a deeply sad individual who dishes it out and cannot for a second take it. You've humiliated yourself time and again on here - word to the wise, you're better off just doing your disappearing act, which you're quite good at, and making it stick this time. No-one likes you, no-one thinks you're funny or smart, and definitely no-one is impressed by your rambling about the military. True or not, it doesn't mean you're not a chickenshit moron.

But hey, maybe you are some military bigshot. In which case, show your CO your posts on this forum. I'm sure he'll be fucking ecstatic :thumbup:
Yup. That's what I thought a parasitic coward.....
So anyone who isn't in the armed forces is a parasitic coward? That's hysterical, well done :lol:

Come on then billy big bollocks, tell us all about your military service. We're all ears. Particularly the bit where it has anything to do with you being an absolute coward on a rugby forum. Maybe you're really brave when you've got a rifle in your hand and you're up against goat herders? We're dying to know! Probably literally if you're as dead hard as you make out!
Biffer
Posts: 9906
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 6:43 pm

Only Aussie military engagements in the last 20 years are East Timor, Solomon Islands and Bougainville, are they not?
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
User avatar
JM2K6
Posts: 10127
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2020 10:43 am

Biffer wrote: Mon Aug 07, 2023 12:28 pm Only Aussie military engagements in the last 20 years are East Timor, Solomon Islands and Bougainville, are they not?
Perhaps they lost to the Emus again and didn't tell anyone?
User avatar
Guy Smiley
Posts: 6517
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:52 pm

Biffer wrote: Mon Aug 07, 2023 12:28 pm Only Aussie military engagements in the last 20 years are East Timor, Solomon Islands and Bougainville, are they not?
They award VCs for shooting unarmed Afghans.

Hard men, Aussies.
inactionman
Posts: 3398
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 7:37 am

Biffer wrote: Mon Aug 07, 2023 12:28 pm Only Aussie military engagements in the last 20 years are East Timor, Solomon Islands and Bougainville, are they not?
Some bits through NATO, for example boots on ground in Iraq and some anti-piracy around Somalia, but that's mostly peacekeeping and regeneration as part of a NATO presence.
TedMaul
Posts: 442
Joined: Thu Jul 01, 2021 12:19 pm

Sources indicate DS is either a woman or a dwarf.
Biffer
Posts: 9906
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 6:43 pm

Recent results demonstrating even further the utter nonsense of the full vs associate distinction in cricket. West indies beating India over five games of T20 despite being humiliated by Associates a month earlier, Ireland getting whumped by India, Scotland snd the Netherlands would have put up a better show
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
Deepsouth
Posts: 408
Joined: Sat May 28, 2022 2:25 am

Guy Smiley wrote: Mon Aug 07, 2023 12:36 pm
Biffer wrote: Mon Aug 07, 2023 12:28 pm Only Aussie military engagements in the last 20 years are East Timor, Solomon Islands and Bougainville, are they not?
They award VCs for shooting unarmed Afghans.

Hard men, Aussies.
You really have a hard on for Australians don't you mail order guy. Did an Aussie cuckold you little man lol,is that why you were reduced to trawling through the slums of Asia desperately looking for a bedfellow?

Now dickhead, unlike New Zealand we haven't covered up our alleged crimes. NZ SAS were up to a bit of baby killing weren't they cuck? Operation Burnham anyone? Covered it up didn't you parasite. And of course British special forces are currently under investigation for around 50 unlawful killings in Afghanistan. But of course it's those immoral Australians who are the real culprits aren't they lol.....
Random1
Posts: 611
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 6:31 pm

One of the few wokesters to whom I enjoy listening. Talking about all things MCC through to Carey’s treatment in the long room.

Biffer
Posts: 9906
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 6:43 pm

New Zealand just lost a T20I to the UAE.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
Gumboot
Posts: 8584
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 9:17 am

Zimbabwe cricket great Heath Streak has died after a battle with cancer. He was 49 years old.

The fast bowler was the first Zimbabwean player to take 100 test wickets, ultimately finishing his 65-test career with 216 to his name.

He also played 189 one-day internationals, taking 239 wickets. He sits seventh in Zimbabwe's all-time list of run scorers.

Former Zimbabwe teammate Henry Olonga took to social media to pay his respects to his country's "greatest allrounder".
Really sad news. I used to enjoy watching him play.

RIP
Gumboot
Posts: 8584
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 9:17 am

Former Zimbabwe fast bowler Heath Streak's demise appears to have been exaggerated, as a former teammate took to social media to rubbish reports of his death on Wednesday.

Streak was reported to have died after a battle with cancer at the age of 49.

Former teammate Henry Olonga was one to post tributes to Streak after his apparent death.

However, Olonga later took to Twitter, posting a WhatsApp screenshot of a conversation with Streak, appearing to contradict claims of his death.

"I can confirm that rumours of the demise of Heath Streak have been greatly exaggerated," Olonga posted.

"I just heard from him. The third umpire has called him back. He is very much alive folks."
:wtf:
User avatar
Insane_Homer
Posts: 5483
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:14 pm
Location: Leafy Surrey

ah shit! Class player. RIP
“Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true.”
User avatar
Guy Smiley
Posts: 6517
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:52 pm

Insane_Homer wrote: Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:26 am ah shit! Class player. RIP
Check Gumboot’s second post. He took the review and overturned the decision.
User avatar
Insane_Homer
Posts: 5483
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:14 pm
Location: Leafy Surrey

ah, excellent! :oops:
“Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true.”
inactionman
Posts: 3398
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 7:37 am

Great name as well
User avatar
Insane_Homer
Posts: 5483
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:14 pm
Location: Leafy Surrey

T20s series start today

SA v Aus 5pm
Eng v NZ 6pm
“Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true.”
User avatar
OomStruisbaai
Posts: 15864
Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2020 12:38 pm
Location: Longest beach in SH

SA won the tos, bowl first. Coetzee to debut
User avatar
Insane_Homer
Posts: 5483
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:14 pm
Location: Leafy Surrey

Aus off to fucking flyer despite the early wicket!
“Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true.”
User avatar
OomStruisbaai
Posts: 15864
Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2020 12:38 pm
Location: Longest beach in SH

83/4 after 8
User avatar
Insane_Homer
Posts: 5483
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:14 pm
Location: Leafy Surrey

192/5 with 3 overs left

226/6
“Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true.”
User avatar
OomStruisbaai
Posts: 15864
Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2020 12:38 pm
Location: Longest beach in SH

Aussie cheaters way to good for our laaities.
Biffer
Posts: 9906
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 6:43 pm

Another mankad causing a stink.



I'm actually entirely ok with this one, the batsman has left the crease before the bowler has got to the stumps, so he's clearly gaining an advantage. It's the ones where the bowler goes through his bowling action and then does it that I think are out of order.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
User avatar
Mahoney
Posts: 640
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 9:37 am

You can't be out that way if the bowler goes through their action:
38.3 Non-striker leaving his/her ground early

38.3.1 At any time from the moment the ball comes into play until the instant when the bowler would normally have been expected to release the ball, the non-striker is liable to be Run out if he/she is out of his/her ground. In these circumstances the non-striker will be out Run out if he/she is out of his/her ground when his/her wicket is broken by the bowler throwing the ball at the stumps or by the bowler’s hand holding the ball, whether or not the ball is subsequently delivered.

38.3.1.1 The instant when the bowler would normally have been expected to release the ball is defined as the moment the bowler’s arm reaches the highest point of his/her normal bowling action in the delivery swing.

38.3.1.2 Even if the non-striker had left his/her ground before the instant at which the bowler would normally have been expected to release the ball, once the bowler has reached that point it is no longer possible for the bowler to run out the non-striker under this Law.
My emphasis.

https://www.lords.org/mcc/the-laws-of-cricket/run-out
Wha daur meddle wi' me?
Biffer
Posts: 9906
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 6:43 pm

Sure is a lot of interest in associate women’s cricket on the internet today.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
User avatar
Insane_Homer
Posts: 5483
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:14 pm
Location: Leafy Surrey

Where is Heinrich Klaasen?
“Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true.”
Thor Sedan
Posts: 1123
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 9:50 am

My god England are good at cricket.

My god New Zealand are no longer very good at cricket
Thor Sedan
Posts: 1123
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 9:50 am

Actually scratch that.....NZ are terrible at cricket.

Our golden years are officially over.
User avatar
Insane_Homer
Posts: 5483
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:14 pm
Location: Leafy Surrey

Aus and Eng should be playing each other and NZ cripple fighting SA, these games are so one sided
“Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true.”
User avatar
Sards
Posts: 9407
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 4:41 am

Sigh
User avatar
Sards
Posts: 9407
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 4:41 am

Finally Stubbs connects. Then is undone again with a straight ball
Post Reply