I am well aware who Lots Ashcroft is. If the contract has been awarded to the company not best to fulfil it, surely the National office of budgetary control (or whatever its called ) would flag it up?Insane_Homer wrote: ↑Thu Jan 21, 2021 11:45 amHe's not just a conservative voting businessman, he was a major donor to and Treasurer of the Conservative Party from 1998 to 2001, he is a former deputy chairman of the Conservative Party, He sat on the Conservative benches of the House of Lords until 2015, and is a fucking tax exile tax dodger.Openside wrote: ↑Thu Jan 21, 2021 10:33 amSince most firms are run by Conservative supporters it’s not too surprising that contracts end up with these companies. If there is impropriety uncover it, this headline doesn’t.Insane_Homer wrote: ↑Thu Jan 21, 2021 8:38 am https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... -role.html
Stop voting for fucking Tories
- Insane_Homer
- Posts: 5389
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:14 pm
- Location: Leafy Surrey
https://www.gov.uk/government/publicati ... s-guidanceThe contract is described as a 'call-off from a framework agreement', meaning it was awarded without an open competitive tender process.
Legal requirements
All in-scope bodies must, as a minimum, follow the legal requirements to publish advertised opportunities and awards on Contracts Finder covered by the Public Contracts Regulations 2015.
This Procurement Policy Note (PPN) reminds contracting authorities to ensure that any procurement opportunities and contract awards above certain low thresholds are published on Contracts Finder.
The thresholds are:
£10,000 for central government bodies and
£25,000 for wider public sector bodies
“Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true.”
It's the time it takes to compete that is going to be used as an excuse.Insane_Homer wrote: ↑Thu Jan 21, 2021 1:30 pmhttps://www.gov.uk/government/publicati ... s-guidanceThe contract is described as a 'call-off from a framework agreement', meaning it was awarded without an open competitive tender process.
Legal requirements
All in-scope bodies must, as a minimum, follow the legal requirements to publish advertised opportunities and awards on Contracts Finder covered by the Public Contracts Regulations 2015.This Procurement Policy Note (PPN) reminds contracting authorities to ensure that any procurement opportunities and contract awards above certain low thresholds are published on Contracts Finder.The thresholds are:
£10,000 for central government bodies and
£25,000 for wider public sector bodies
I completely get that in an emergency situation you can't compete things the way you should due to time constraints.
It really is disgusting that this has been used as an excuse to award large contract to buddies. The amount of this that happened in the PPE procurement was appalling.
Presumed this article was something that could be linked to Covid, couldn't bring myself to click on a DM link.
The NAO do not get advanced notice of contracats being awarded. They investigate retrospectively to confirm that we taxpayers are getting value for money on the contracts awardedOpenside wrote: ↑Thu Jan 21, 2021 1:16 pmI am well aware who Lots Ashcroft is. If the contract has been awarded to the company not best to fulfil it, surely the National office of budgetary control (or whatever its called ) would flag it up?Insane_Homer wrote: ↑Thu Jan 21, 2021 11:45 amHe's not just a conservative voting businessman, he was a major donor to and Treasurer of the Conservative Party from 1998 to 2001, he is a former deputy chairman of the Conservative Party, He sat on the Conservative benches of the House of Lords until 2015, and is a fucking tax exile tax dodger.
We have three key strategic objectives to ensure we achieve our vision: The National Audit Office (NAO) helps Parliament hold government to account for the way it spends public money. We do this by auditing the finances of public bodies and scrutinising public spending to assess facts and value for the taxpayer.
This is the role of Crown Commercial who own the whole contractual process piece across government, there has to be very clear and strong justification for single award without competition. Undoubtedly given the profile of this there will be an FOI request to see all material related to this award and they have absolutely no reason under FOI to refuse it as it is not anything sensitive or defence related. They will need to disclose which framework was used, how many tenders, longlisting, shortlisting, the assesment criteria, supplier scorecards and the costs put forward as a part of each bid. If there has been a direct award with no competition, they will need to provide a very clear justification as to why this was done.Openside wrote: ↑Thu Jan 21, 2021 1:16 pmI am well aware who Lots Ashcroft is. If the contract has been awarded to the company not best to fulfil it, surely the National office of budgetary control (or whatever its called ) would flag it up?Insane_Homer wrote: ↑Thu Jan 21, 2021 11:45 amHe's not just a conservative voting businessman, he was a major donor to and Treasurer of the Conservative Party from 1998 to 2001, he is a former deputy chairman of the Conservative Party, He sat on the Conservative benches of the House of Lords until 2015, and is a fucking tax exile tax dodger.
- Insane_Homer
- Posts: 5389
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:14 pm
- Location: Leafy Surrey
They follow this procedure.
https://goodlawproject.org/news/special ... -channels/
and the NAO reportLeaked documents seen by Good Law Project set out special pathways by which “VIP” and “Cabinet Office” contacts could be awarded lucrative PPE contracts at the height of the pandemic
...The leaked documents disclose that special procurement channels
https://www.nao.org.uk/report/governmen ... -pandemic/
We looked in detail at a sample of contracts selected on a risk basis. Although we found sufficient documentation for a number of procurements in our sample, we also found specific examples where there is insufficient documentation on key decisions, or how risks such as perceived or actual conflicts of interest have been identified or managed. In addition, a number of contracts were awarded retrospectively, or have not been published in a timely manner. This has diminished public transparency, and the lack of adequate documentation means we cannot give assurance that government has adequately mitigated the increased risks arising from emergency procurement or applied appropriate commercial practices in all cases.
“Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true.”
It would appear that the bumbling blonde slug ahsn't got a clue either. Carrie wont be happyNo 10's war on 'woke' suffers setback as spokesman says he's not sure what term means
At the Downing Street lobby briefing there was an attempt - sadly, unsuccessful - to get some clarification from the prime minister’s spokesman as to whether or not Boris Johnson sees himself as “woke”. This followed last night’s surprising “woke U-turn”. Since the general election Tory ministers have generally been all too happy to condemn all things “woke” (in what seems to be a fairly transparent attempt to goad Labour into a culture war) and this reached its apotheosis on Sunday, when Robert Jenrick, the communities secretary, used an article in the Sunday Telegraph to protect statues from “town hall militants and woke worthies”.
[media] [/media]
SaintK wrote: ↑Thu Jan 21, 2021 3:14 pmIt would appear that the bumbling blonde slug ahsn't got a clue either. Carrie wont be happyNo 10's war on 'woke' suffers setback as spokesman says he's not sure what term means
At the Downing Street lobby briefing there was an attempt - sadly, unsuccessful - to get some clarification from the prime minister’s spokesman as to whether or not Boris Johnson sees himself as “woke”. This followed last night’s surprising “woke U-turn”. Since the general election Tory ministers have generally been all too happy to condemn all things “woke” (in what seems to be a fairly transparent attempt to goad Labour into a culture war) and this reached its apotheosis on Sunday, when Robert Jenrick, the communities secretary, used an article in the Sunday Telegraph to protect statues from “town hall militants and woke worthies”.
[media] [/media]
That's a shockingly embarrassingly 'answer' for any politician, let alone an MP, let alone the PM.
To say that was incoherent is being hugely unkind to anything that has ever been associated with incoherence.
Surely rule 1 in press training is to clarify/alter the question if you're unsure how to answer? (it was a bit of a silly question, but with that silliness it should be easier to provide some form of response).
There was me thinking that Gavin Williamson's interview this morning was as embarrassing and cringe-worthy as the day would get....
Over the hills and far away........
Nobody is any the wiser when Patel answers a question
She was her usual confusingly ineffectual self, repeating the same stock phrases she manages to memorise
She was her usual confusingly ineffectual self, repeating the same stock phrases she manages to memorise
Unlike some of her fellow ministers, Priti Patel doesn't openly dodge questions. It's more than she spends five minutes making a series of apparently unconnected sentences until you're not quite sure what she meant, what the question was, or why it mattered in the first place.
-
- Posts: 1731
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:49 pm
Insane_Homer wrote: ↑Thu Jan 21, 2021 2:36 pmThey follow this procedure.
https://goodlawproject.org/news/special ... -channels/
and the NAO reportLeaked documents seen by Good Law Project set out special pathways by which “VIP” and “Cabinet Office” contacts could be awarded lucrative PPE contracts at the height of the pandemic
...The leaked documents disclose that special procurement channels
https://www.nao.org.uk/report/governmen ... -pandemic/
We looked in detail at a sample of contracts selected on a risk basis. Although we found sufficient documentation for a number of procurements in our sample, we also found specific examples where there is insufficient documentation on key decisions, or how risks such as perceived or actual conflicts of interest have been identified or managed. In addition, a number of contracts were awarded retrospectively, or have not been published in a timely manner. This has diminished public transparency, and the lack of adequate documentation means we cannot give assurance that government has adequately mitigated the increased risks arising from emergency procurement or applied appropriate commercial practices in all cases.
The only guaranteed grift here is Jolyons latest scam law cases. I dearly hope IH sends money into the crowd funding.
For the NAO these are pretty scathing comments.Bimbowomxn wrote: ↑Thu Jan 21, 2021 6:21 pmInsane_Homer wrote: ↑Thu Jan 21, 2021 2:36 pmThey follow this procedure.
https://goodlawproject.org/news/special ... -channels/
and the NAO reportLeaked documents seen by Good Law Project set out special pathways by which “VIP” and “Cabinet Office” contacts could be awarded lucrative PPE contracts at the height of the pandemic
...The leaked documents disclose that special procurement channels
https://www.nao.org.uk/report/governmen ... -pandemic/
We looked in detail at a sample of contracts selected on a risk basis. Although we found sufficient documentation for a number of procurements in our sample, we also found specific examples where there is insufficient documentation on key decisions, or how risks such as perceived or actual conflicts of interest have been identified or managed. In addition, a number of contracts were awarded retrospectively, or have not been published in a timely manner. This has diminished public transparency, and the lack of adequate documentation means we cannot give assurance that government has adequately mitigated the increased risks arising from emergency procurement or applied appropriate commercial practices in all cases.
The only guaranteed grift here is Jolyons latest scam law cases. I dearly hope IH sends money into the crowd funding.
- Hal Jordan
- Posts: 4154
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 12:48 pm
- Location: Sector 2814
Yes, but against the Tories, so invalid/lies/leave Britney alone.
-
- Posts: 3585
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 9:37 am
Rishi Sunak's best man the Spectator's Pol Ed James Forsyth's wife Allegra Stratton getting paid £100,000+ to front govt press conferences. Where has she gone?
- Insane_Homer
- Posts: 5389
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:14 pm
- Location: Leafy Surrey
When unable to deal with facts, it predictably returns to fail safe fall back of the ad hominem attackBimbowomxn wrote: ↑Thu Jan 21, 2021 6:21 pm The only guaranteed grift here is Jolyons latest scam law cases. I dearly hope IH sends money into the crowd funding.
“Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true.”
Yep - just ignore!Insane_Homer wrote: ↑Thu Jan 21, 2021 9:07 pmWhen unable to deal with facts, it predictably returns to fail safe fall back of the ad hominem attackBimbowomxn wrote: ↑Thu Jan 21, 2021 6:21 pm The only guaranteed grift here is Jolyons latest scam law cases. I dearly hope IH sends money into the crowd funding.
In NAO terms that is an audit and compliance fail.dpedin wrote: ↑Thu Jan 21, 2021 6:42 pmFor the NAO these are pretty scathing comments.Bimbowomxn wrote: ↑Thu Jan 21, 2021 6:21 pmInsane_Homer wrote: ↑Thu Jan 21, 2021 2:36 pm
They follow this procedure.
https://goodlawproject.org/news/special ... -channels/
and the NAO report
https://www.nao.org.uk/report/governmen ... -pandemic/
The only guaranteed grift here is Jolyons latest scam law cases. I dearly hope IH sends money into the crowd funding.
I'm guessing that they are pretty toothless though.ASMO wrote: ↑Fri Jan 22, 2021 10:48 amIn NAO terms that is an audit and compliance fail.dpedin wrote: ↑Thu Jan 21, 2021 6:42 pmFor the NAO these are pretty scathing comments.Bimbowomxn wrote: ↑Thu Jan 21, 2021 6:21 pm
The only guaranteed grift here is Jolyons latest scam law cases. I dearly hope IH sends money into the crowd funding.
- ScarfaceClaw
- Posts: 2623
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:11 pm
Rick Stein owns most of Cornwall and it’s inhabitants are more or less a serfdom for him.
That’ll come as a bit of a surprise to the Duchy of CornwallScarfaceClaw wrote: ↑Sat Jan 23, 2021 10:04 amRick Stein owns most of Cornwall and it’s inhabitants are more or less a serfdom for him.
- ScarfaceClaw
- Posts: 2623
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:11 pm
He’s talking about Rixit where Cornwall leaves the UK.SaintK wrote: ↑Sat Jan 23, 2021 10:18 amThat’ll come as a bit of a surprise to the Duchy of Cornwall :lol:ScarfaceClaw wrote: ↑Sat Jan 23, 2021 10:04 amRick Stein owns most of Cornwall and it’s inhabitants are more or less a serfdom for him.
- Hal Jordan
- Posts: 4154
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 12:48 pm
- Location: Sector 2814
I believe traditionally it was a Liberal area, but got all Brexity and retired Bufton-Tuftons moving there. Plus constituency border changes meant it went from five Lib Dem MPs in the 2000s to three Lib Dems and three Tories in 2010 (odd how that seems to happen, see also redefining Democrat districts in the US). Then the disastrous last election campaign for the Lib Dems meant we get the delights of George Eustice being re-elected...
Ynys Mon has become a three way contest because Labour, Plaid and the Tories get a roughly equal share of the vote so the Tories have sneaked in a couple of times. I thought it might be something like that in Cornwall, but no, overall the Tories got over 50% of the vote. As you say, Brexit and demographic changes.Hal Jordan wrote: ↑Sat Jan 23, 2021 10:34 amI believe traditionally it was a Liberal area, but got all Brexity and retired Bufton-Tuftons moving there. Plus constituency border changes meant it went from five Lib Dem MPs in the 2000s to three Lib Dems and three Tories in 2010 (odd how that seems to happen, see also redefining Democrat districts in the US). Then the disastrous last election campaign for the Lib Dems meant we get the delights of George Eustice being re-elected...
- Insane_Homer
- Posts: 5389
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:14 pm
- Location: Leafy Surrey
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-politics-55767262
Conservative leader in the Welsh Parliament Paul Davies has quit after being seen drinking with other politicians in the Senedd, days into a pub alcohol ban.
“Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true.”
Brexit and demographic changes don’t really cover it, it is more a reflection of political trends in the last twenty years that aren’t necessarily Cornish. Cornwall had seats like Camborne/Redruth that had strong Labour traditions, but those days are gone and that is just a reflection of Labour’s overall problems in rural areas. The Liberal tradition in Cornwall like the rest of the Southwest was Liberal and inherited by the Lib Dem’s and as the Lib Dem’s went to the left to chase expansion so the Tories were able to chip away at the old Liberal seats throughout the southwest not just Cornwall.GogLais wrote: ↑Sat Jan 23, 2021 10:45 amYnys Mon has become a three way contest because Labour, Plaid and the Tories get a roughly equal share of the vote so the Tories have sneaked in a couple of times. I thought it might be something like that in Cornwall, but no, overall the Tories got over 50% of the vote. As you say, Brexit and demographic changes.Hal Jordan wrote: ↑Sat Jan 23, 2021 10:34 amI believe traditionally it was a Liberal area, but got all Brexity and retired Bufton-Tuftons moving there. Plus constituency border changes meant it went from five Lib Dem MPs in the 2000s to three Lib Dems and three Tories in 2010 (odd how that seems to happen, see also redefining Democrat districts in the US). Then the disastrous last election campaign for the Lib Dems meant we get the delights of George Eustice being re-elected...
Also George Eustice is no incomer he is local lad and familiar with the area and whilst he may make some proper Cornish lefties like TGJ explode, I know quite a few from my Labour Party days (my family was militantly trade unionist and left wing) who have softened to him as they believe he has local interests at heart.
Don’t go polluting this thread with any factual or balanced information ffsohno wrote: ↑Sat Jan 23, 2021 10:03 pmBrexit and demographic changes don’t really cover it, it is more a reflection of political trends in the last twenty years that aren’t necessarily Cornish. Cornwall had seats like Camborne/Redruth that had strong Labour traditions, but those days are gone and that is just a reflection of Labour’s overall problems in rural areas. The Liberal tradition in Cornwall like the rest of the Southwest was Liberal and inherited by the Lib Dem’s and as the Lib Dem’s went to the left to chase expansion so the Tories were able to chip away at the old Liberal seats throughout the southwest not just Cornwall.GogLais wrote: ↑Sat Jan 23, 2021 10:45 amYnys Mon has become a three way contest because Labour, Plaid and the Tories get a roughly equal share of the vote so the Tories have sneaked in a couple of times. I thought it might be something like that in Cornwall, but no, overall the Tories got over 50% of the vote. As you say, Brexit and demographic changes.Hal Jordan wrote: ↑Sat Jan 23, 2021 10:34 am
I believe traditionally it was a Liberal area, but got all Brexity and retired Bufton-Tuftons moving there. Plus constituency border changes meant it went from five Lib Dem MPs in the 2000s to three Lib Dems and three Tories in 2010 (odd how that seems to happen, see also redefining Democrat districts in the US). Then the disastrous last election campaign for the Lib Dems meant we get the delights of George Eustice being re-elected...
Also George Eustice is no incomer he is local lad and familiar with the area and whilst he may make some proper Cornish lefties like TGJ explode, I know quite a few from my Labour Party days (my family was militantly trade unionist and left wing) who have softened to him as they believe he has local interests at heart.
I hope that nice Mr Shapps has some answers ready?
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021 ... nt-agencyMinisters are at the centre of an explosive row over their failure to protect workers from Covid-19 as the Observer reveals the largest workplace outbreak of the virus has taken place at a top government organisation.
More than 500 cases have been recorded at the Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency’s offices in Swansea, where employees claim people with symptoms were encouraged to return to work while vulnerable workers have had requests to work from home turned down.
The revelation places the transport secretary, Grant Shapps, under pressure to explain how such an outbreak could have happened in an agency where the strictest workplace rules are supposed to apply.
A complaint received by Public Health Wales’s outbreak control team claims DVLA workers were asked to turn off their test-and-trace apps “so that their phones do not ping”.
-
- Posts: 3585
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 9:37 am
The answer is takeaway coffee shops are spreading covid and people's selfishness not poor guidelines and governance.SaintK wrote: ↑Sun Jan 24, 2021 2:18 pm I hope that nice Mr Shapps has some answers ready?https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021 ... nt-agencyMinisters are at the centre of an explosive row over their failure to protect workers from Covid-19 as the Observer reveals the largest workplace outbreak of the virus has taken place at a top government organisation.
More than 500 cases have been recorded at the Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency’s offices in Swansea, where employees claim people with symptoms were encouraged to return to work while vulnerable workers have had requests to work from home turned down.
The revelation places the transport secretary, Grant Shapps, under pressure to explain how such an outbreak could have happened in an agency where the strictest workplace rules are supposed to apply.
A complaint received by Public Health Wales’s outbreak control team claims DVLA workers were asked to turn off their test-and-trace apps “so that their phones do not ping”.
- fishfoodie
- Posts: 8223
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm
If this is corroborated; it should surely result in the dismissal of anyone who made such a request; & in other times; the resignation of the responsible MinisterSaintK wrote: ↑Sun Jan 24, 2021 2:18 pm I hope that nice Mr Shapps has some answers ready?https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021 ... nt-agencyMinisters are at the centre of an explosive row over their failure to protect workers from Covid-19 as the Observer reveals the largest workplace outbreak of the virus has taken place at a top government organisation.
More than 500 cases have been recorded at the Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency’s offices in Swansea, where employees claim people with symptoms were encouraged to return to work while vulnerable workers have had requests to work from home turned down.
The revelation places the transport secretary, Grant Shapps, under pressure to explain how such an outbreak could have happened in an agency where the strictest workplace rules are supposed to apply.
A complaint received by Public Health Wales’s outbreak control team claims DVLA workers were asked to turn off their test-and-trace apps “so that their phones do not ping”.
Two of my neighbours work there, both tested positive and self isolated until given the all clear, at the DVLA they had a testing centre set up that could cope with up to 3000 tests a day.SaintK wrote: ↑Sun Jan 24, 2021 2:18 pm I hope that nice Mr Shapps has some answers ready?https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021 ... nt-agencyMinisters are at the centre of an explosive row over their failure to protect workers from Covid-19 as the Observer reveals the largest workplace outbreak of the virus has taken place at a top government organisation.
More than 500 cases have been recorded at the Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency’s offices in Swansea, where employees claim people with symptoms were encouraged to return to work while vulnerable workers have had requests to work from home turned down.
The revelation places the transport secretary, Grant Shapps, under pressure to explain how such an outbreak could have happened in an agency where the strictest workplace rules are supposed to apply.
A complaint received by Public Health Wales’s outbreak control team claims DVLA workers were asked to turn off their test-and-trace apps “so that their phones do not ping”.
- Insane_Homer
- Posts: 5389
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:14 pm
- Location: Leafy Surrey
“Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true.”
-
- Posts: 1731
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:49 pm
Insane_Homer wrote: ↑Thu Jan 21, 2021 9:07 pmWhen unable to deal with facts, it predictably returns to fail safe fall back of the ad hominem attackBimbowomxn wrote: ↑Thu Jan 21, 2021 6:21 pm The only guaranteed grift here is Jolyons latest scam law cases. I dearly hope IH sends money into the crowd funding.
What’s the “attack”here, I’m confused , unless of course I’m right.
-
- Posts: 1731
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:49 pm
I like neeps wrote: ↑Sun Jan 24, 2021 2:28 pmThe answer is takeaway coffee shops are spreading covid and people's selfishness not poor guidelines and governance.SaintK wrote: ↑Sun Jan 24, 2021 2:18 pm I hope that nice Mr Shapps has some answers ready?https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021 ... nt-agencyMinisters are at the centre of an explosive row over their failure to protect workers from Covid-19 as the Observer reveals the largest workplace outbreak of the virus has taken place at a top government organisation.
More than 500 cases have been recorded at the Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency’s offices in Swansea, where employees claim people with symptoms were encouraged to return to work while vulnerable workers have had requests to work from home turned down.
The revelation places the transport secretary, Grant Shapps, under pressure to explain how such an outbreak could have happened in an agency where the strictest workplace rules are supposed to apply.
A complaint received by Public Health Wales’s outbreak control team claims DVLA workers were asked to turn off their test-and-trace apps “so that their phones do not ping”.
You’ve some research I guess for the coffee shop claim ?
-
- Posts: 3585
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 9:37 am
Yes, the Government's own research actually:Bimbowomxn wrote: ↑Mon Jan 25, 2021 8:54 amI like neeps wrote: ↑Sun Jan 24, 2021 2:28 pmThe answer is takeaway coffee shops are spreading covid and people's selfishness not poor guidelines and governance.SaintK wrote: ↑Sun Jan 24, 2021 2:18 pm I hope that nice Mr Shapps has some answers ready?
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021 ... nt-agency
You’ve some research I guess for the coffee shop claim ?
https://www.gov.uk/government/publicati ... ember-2020
Click on the paper and the environment bit.
- Insane_Homer
- Posts: 5389
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:14 pm
- Location: Leafy Surrey
Bimbowomxn wrote: ↑Mon Jan 25, 2021 8:53 amWhat’s the “attack” here, I’m confused , unless of course I’m right.Insane_Homer wrote: ↑Thu Jan 21, 2021 9:07 pmWhen unable to deal with facts, it predictably returns to fail safe fall back of the ad hominem attackBimbowomxn wrote: ↑Thu Jan 21, 2021 6:21 pm The only guaranteed grift here is Jolyons latest scam law cases. I dearly hope IH sends money into the crowd funding.
Typically this term refers to a rhetorical strategy where the speaker attacks the character, motive, or some other attribute of the person making an argument rather than attacking the substance of the argument itself
“Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true.”
- Torquemada 1420
- Posts: 11155
- Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:22 am
- Location: Hut 8
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2021/0 ... xercising/
https://action.goodlawproject.org/civic ... fb38961f09
In short
- dodgy computers to schoolkids
- crony charging way over the odds for them
Government to discontinue Covid ad accusing joggers or those exercising of being 'highly likely' to have the virus
And whilst they are lying to us, their cronies continue to trough from the COVID cornucopia that keeps giving from the public purseThe taxpayer-funded advert was condemned by MPs and public health experts for spreading "false information"
https://action.goodlawproject.org/civic ... fb38961f09
In short
- dodgy computers to schoolkids
- crony charging way over the odds for them