NPR

Openside wrote: ↑Sat Oct 31, 2020 8:02 am

Big Nipper wrote: ↑Sat Oct 31, 2020 7:30 am

Openside wrote: ↑Sat Oct 31, 2020 12:11 am

I am barely on the bored these days so haven't seen these 'racist talking points'. if you are referring to his fears re Islam frankly we should all be concerned about that.

Can you even read? Or are you just going to ignore his baseless claim of a white genocide in South Africa? I am a white man here, I reckon I would know if there was a genocide going on

What a ridiculous statement, of course I can read, can you? Which bit of I am barely on the bored these days so haven’t seen his alleged ‘racist talking points’ didn’t you understand. Re Islam I am very concerned that this religion of peace seems to regularly convert followers into nutters who want to kill infidels in as large a number as their pea brains can manage.

So you are just going to ignore the completely unfounded bit about the white genocide taking place in SA?

Openside wrote: ↑Sat Oct 31, 2020 8:02 am What a ridiculous statement, of course I can read, can you? Which bit of I am barely on the bored these days so haven’t seen his alleged ‘racist talking points’ didn’t you understand. Re Islam I am very concerned that this religion of peace seems to regularly convert followers into nutters who want to kill infidels in as large a number as their pea brains can manage.

You quoted his "White genocide" post, yet apparently you haven't seen it

Openside wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 6:04 pm

Sandstorm wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:40 am

DAC wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:17 am One of the worst thing I hate about you Chicken Runners is that you refuse to admit or even acknowledge the genocide being carried against your own people right this very minute. Do you know why that is? - You're cowards of the very worst kind.

Have a lovely day.

Can’t imagine why DAC struggles to make friends here.

I have no problem with DAC

Openside wrote: ↑Sat Oct 31, 2020 8:02 am

Big Nipper wrote: ↑Sat Oct 31, 2020 7:30 am

Openside wrote: ↑Sat Oct 31, 2020 12:11 am

I am barely on the bored these days so haven't seen these 'racist talking points'. if you are referring to his fears re Islam frankly we should all be concerned about that.

Can you even read? Or are you just going to ignore his baseless claim of a white genocide in South Africa? I am a white man here, I reckon I would know if there was a genocide going on

What a ridiculous statement, of course I can read, can you? Which bit of I am barely on the bored these days so haven’t seen his alleged ‘racist talking points’ didn’t you understand. Re Islam I am very concerned that this religion of peace seems to regularly convert followers into nutters who want to kill infidels in as large a number as their pea brains can manage.

https://notplanetrugby.com/viewtopic.php?p=44468#p44468
It's just up the page.

Muttonbird wrote: ↑Sat Oct 31, 2020 5:51 am

sockwithaticket wrote: ↑Thu Oct 29, 2020 10:33 am Did anyone catch last week those two towns projecting the Mo cartoons against municipal buildings? Sparked some heated debate in various corners of the internet, unsurprisingly.

On the one hand, yes, it is provocative and would stir up further hostility from the Muslim community liek this horrendous incident. On the other, if you don't do it or something else to reinforce that anyone has the right to depict the prophet, whether it's in an educational context as with the teacher or straight up wanting to be offensive for the sake of it, then the extremists win. Yet if you take the course to assert the rights and secularism of France it gets construed as attacking Islam and helps the extremist recruiters. Every action that is perceived to encroach upon Islam fuels actions that will encourage greater state intervention and resentment of the French public towards their Islamic citizens (regardless of whether they're Islamists or not), yet the state cannot simply turn the other cheek. To do so would be a dereliction of duty to the populous.

It's a vicious Catch 22 to which I see no solution.

It's not a Catch 22. There is a solution. Don't project Charlie Hebdo cartoons on buildings would be a great start, ffs.

France. What a bunch of idiots.

Thanks for your input, but I only really value the opinions of those with greater mental capacity than a concussed ant.

Openside wrote: ↑Sat Oct 31, 2020 12:11 am

JM2K6 wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 11:57 pm

Openside wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 6:04 pm

I have no problem with DAC

So him endlessly repeating racist far-right talking points is OK in your book?

I am barely on the bored these days so haven't seen these 'racist talking points'. if you are referring to his fears re Islam frankly we should all be concerned about that.

You literally quoted him saying it.

Also - and this is important - he's been spewing far-right hatred for over a decade. He was repeating Gates of Vienna conspiracy theories in the 2000s for fuck's sake. He's been a one-note poster outside of a handful of Welsh rugby threads for several years.

But hey, thanks for making it clear you're a fellow traveller when it comes to Muslims.

RichieRich89 wrote: ↑Thu Oct 29, 2020 6:46 pm There'd be far fewer radical Muslims in Europe if it wasn't for Barack Hussein Obama creating the refugee crisis by de-stabilising Libya and funding extremists in Syria to try to topple al-Assad.

The campaign against Assad is despicable

I accidentally stumbled upon this after googling "French products list", it was the first thing that came up.

https://theislamicinformation.com/list- ... o-boycott/

To answer it, the French President, Macron allowed the Magazine to publish the cartoons of Prophet Muhammad. After that two unfortunate events took place and later the French President declared Islam a “religion in crisis”, hurting the religious sentiments of the Muslims all around the world.

Macron said that the Cartoons of the Prophet Muhammad are the freedom of speech. To protect the Prophet Muhammad PBUH, Muslims all around the world are now boycotting all the products that are “Made in France”.

Lemoentjie wrote: ↑Sat Oct 31, 2020 2:24 pm

RichieRich89 wrote: ↑Thu Oct 29, 2020 6:46 pm There'd be far fewer radical Muslims in Europe if it wasn't for Barack Hussein Obama creating the refugee crisis by de-stabilising Libya and funding extremists in Syria to try to topple al-Assad.

The campaign against Assad is despicable

The BBC had a very interesting series about Syria in the early days Assad's reign mostly from a schools perspective.
Very Liberal, women to the fore, little religious bias in the schools.
And then look at the situation now.

Glaston wrote: ↑Sat Oct 31, 2020 4:14 pm

Lemoentjie wrote: ↑Sat Oct 31, 2020 2:24 pm

RichieRich89 wrote: ↑Thu Oct 29, 2020 6:46 pm There'd be far fewer radical Muslims in Europe if it wasn't for Barack Hussein Obama creating the refugee crisis by de-stabilising Libya and funding extremists in Syria to try to topple al-Assad.

The campaign against Assad is despicable

The BBC had a very interesting series about Syria in the early days Assad's reign mostly from a schools perspective.
Very Liberal, women to the fore, little religious bias in the schools.
And then look at the situation now.

His downfall was having Iranian bases in the south of Syria, which angered a certain group of US politicians. As well as this, he preferred Russia to the US, which is a crime punishable via CIA-funded revolutions and coups.

Big Nipper wrote: ↑Sat Oct 31, 2020 8:21 am [quote=Openside post_id=44791 time=<a href="tel:1604131320">1604131320</a> user_id=95]
[quote="Big Nipper" post_id=44777 time=<a href="tel:1604129444">1604129444</a> user_id=182]
[quote=Openside post_id=44715 time=<a href="tel:1604103061">1604103061</a> user_id=95]


I am barely on the bored these days so haven't seen these 'racist talking points'. if you are referring to his fears re Islam frankly we should all be concerned about that.

Can you even read? Or are you just going to ignore his baseless claim of a white genocide in South Africa? I am a white man here, I reckon I would know if there was a genocide going on
[/quote]

What a ridiculous statement, of course I can read, can you? Which bit of I am barely on the bored these days so haven’t seen his alleged ‘racist talking points’ didn’t you understand. Re Islam I am very concerned that this religion of peace seems to regularly convert followers into nutters who want to kill infidels in as large a number as their pea brains can manage.
[/quote]

So you are just going to ignore the completely unfounded bit about the white genocide taking place in SA?


[/quote]

Big Nipper wrote: ↑Sat Oct 31, 2020 8:21 am

Openside wrote: ↑Sat Oct 31, 2020 8:02 am

Big Nipper wrote: ↑Sat Oct 31, 2020 7:30 am
Can you even read? Or are you just going to ignore his baseless claim of a white genocide in South Africa? I am a white man here, I reckon I would know if there was a genocide going on

What a ridiculous statement, of course I can read, can you? Which bit of I am barely on the bored these days so haven’t seen his alleged ‘racist talking points’ didn’t you understand. Re Islam I am very concerned that this religion of peace seems to regularly convert followers into nutters who want to kill infidels in as large a number as their pea brains can manage.

So you are just going to ignore the completely unfounded bit about the white genocide taking place in SA?

I haven’t read anything about it.

JM2K6 wrote: ↑Sat Oct 31, 2020 12:29 pm

Openside wrote: ↑Sat Oct 31, 2020 12:11 am

JM2K6 wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 11:57 pm

So him endlessly repeating racist far-right talking points is OK in your book?

I am barely on the bored these days so haven't seen these 'racist talking points'. if you are referring to his fears re Islam frankly we should all be concerned about that.

You literally quoted him saying it.

Also - and this is important - he's been spewing far-right hatred for over a decade. He was repeating Gates of Vienna conspiracy theories in the 2000s for fuck's sake. He's been a one-note poster outside of a handful of Welsh rugby threads for several years.

But hey, thanks for making it clear you're a fellow traveller when it comes to Muslims.

The post I quoted had absolutely no detail in it al all...

So we are fellow travellers when it comes to Muslims Whatever that means?

Ftr I would like to see all sky fairy worship banned.

Lemoentjie wrote: ↑Sat Oct 31, 2020 2:24 pm

RichieRich89 wrote: ↑Thu Oct 29, 2020 6:46 pm There'd be far fewer radical Muslims in Europe if it wasn't for Barack Hussein Obama creating the refugee crisis by de-stabilising Libya and funding extremists in Syria to try to topple al-Assad.

The campaign against Assad is despicable

Double-speak alert.

sockwithaticket wrote: ↑Sat Oct 31, 2020 10:39 am

Muttonbird wrote: ↑Sat Oct 31, 2020 5:51 am

sockwithaticket wrote: ↑Thu Oct 29, 2020 10:33 am Did anyone catch last week those two towns projecting the Mo cartoons against municipal buildings? Sparked some heated debate in various corners of the internet, unsurprisingly.

On the one hand, yes, it is provocative and would stir up further hostility from the Muslim community liek this horrendous incident. On the other, if you don't do it or something else to reinforce that anyone has the right to depict the prophet, whether it's in an educational context as with the teacher or straight up wanting to be offensive for the sake of it, then the extremists win. Yet if you take the course to assert the rights and secularism of France it gets construed as attacking Islam and helps the extremist recruiters. Every action that is perceived to encroach upon Islam fuels actions that will encourage greater state intervention and resentment of the French public towards their Islamic citizens (regardless of whether they're Islamists or not), yet the state cannot simply turn the other cheek. To do so would be a dereliction of duty to the populous.

It's a vicious Catch 22 to which I see no solution.

It's not a Catch 22. There is a solution. Don't project Charlie Hebdo cartoons on buildings would be a great start, ffs.

France. What a bunch of idiots.

Thanks for your input, but I only really value the opinions of those with greater mental capacity than a concussed ant.

Unfortunately, Muttonbird's views pass for what's commonly accepted as informed opinion in NZ these days: suppress all those whose speech might hurt somebody's feelings but appease all those who'd chop off their heads.

Openside wrote: ↑Sat Oct 31, 2020 9:24 pm The post I quoted had absolutely no detail in it al all...

Openside wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 6:04 pm

Sandstorm wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:40 am

DAC wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:17 am One of the worst thing I hate about you Chicken Runners is that you refuse to admit or even acknowledge the genocide being carried against your own people right this very minute. Do you know why that is? - You're cowards of the very worst kind.

Have a lovely day.

Can’t imagine why DAC struggles to make friends here.

I have no problem with DAC

Fucking liar

sturginho wrote: ↑Sun Nov 01, 2020 10:20 am

Openside wrote: ↑Sat Oct 31, 2020 9:24 pm The post I quoted had absolutely no detail in it al all...

Openside wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 6:04 pm

Sandstorm wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:40 am

Can’t imagine why DAC struggles to make friends here.

I have no problem with DAC

Fucking liar

Oh that passes for detail now does it do me a favour.

Keep digging pal, you're the one who said you "didn't see" it

sturginho wrote: ↑Sun Nov 01, 2020 5:51 pm Keep digging pal, you're the one who said you "didn't see" it

no I didn't, I said I hadn't read his racist talking points. A dig about chicken runners ignoring white genocide at home isn't necessarily racist at all.( I suspect there are plenty of SA farmers that feel targeted.)

RichieRich89 wrote: ↑Thu Oct 29, 2020 6:46 pm There'd be far fewer radical Muslims in Europe if it wasn't for Barack Hussein Obama creating the refugee crisis by de-stabilising Libya and funding extremists in Syria to try to topple al-Assad.

DAC couldn't stay away very long could he?

JM2K6 wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 1:35 pm

PornDog wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 10:06 am

DAC wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:17 am One of the worst thing I hate about you Chicken Runners is that you refuse to admit or even acknowledge the genocide being carried against your own people right this very minute. Do you know why that is? - You're cowards of the very worst kind.

Have a lovely day.

Jesus Christ - is this some white genocide thing!!!!!

While I've always known you held some strong anti-muslim feelings, that's full on bat shit crazy white supremacist racist talk!

Why on earth are you even remotely surprised? This is who DAC has been for at least the last ten years.

I guess I've never seen it so overtly put out there before!! I'm genuinely shocked by that - its US redneck amoeba like levels of intellect.

Openside wrote: ↑Sat Oct 31, 2020 12:11 am

JM2K6 wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 11:57 pm

Openside wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 6:04 pm

I have no problem with DAC

So him endlessly repeating racist far-right talking points is OK in your book?

I am barely on the bored these days so haven't seen these 'racist talking points'. if you are referring to his fears re Islam frankly we should all be concerned about that.

The racist talking point is literally a few posts above yours!

Do you sympathise with his belief that the white race is currently going through a genocide?

It's dangerous batshit crazy lunatic talk and if you don't actively criticise it then you're an evil fucking cunt! There's no grey area with something as extreme as that!

Insane_Homer wrote: ↑Sat Oct 31, 2020 7:22 am

Muttonbird wrote: ↑Sat Oct 31, 2020 5:51 amIt's not a Catch 22. There is a solution. Don't project Charlie Hebdo cartoons on buildings would be a great start, ffs.

France. What a bunch of idiots.

Why? Should we now just pander to the religiously insane?

Of course not, but this isn't pandering - this is going out of your way to be deliberately insulting - to actively poke a finger in the eye of the entire religion is itself fucking stupid. You never changed anybody's opinion about anything by calling them a dick!

Whats worse is that you're not just challenging the extreme views within that religion, you're insulting all followers of that faith and sending them a very clear message that their faith is not welcome in your society. That's just pouring fuel onto a fire.

There are better ways to stoke debate on this subject than going for the nuclear option. This is no different to spilling a bunch of pigs blood in front of a Synagogue.

Reasoned debate has the ability to bring about change - two lines of assholes flinging shit at each other just spreads disease!

Whats worse is that you're not just challenging the extreme views within that religion, you're insulting all followers of that faith and sending them a very clear message that their faith is not welcome in your society. That's just poring fuel onto a fire.

There are better ways to stoke debate on this subject than going for the nuclear option. This is no different to spilling a bunch of pigs blood in front of a Synagogue.

Whats worse is that a group of people choosing to take offence over some medieval ideas they hold are demanding that their ideas have supremacy in a secular republic.....


There’s no better way to support the idea of free thought and secular laws than to challenge them directly.

Its not worse - its bad, but its not worse.

We have to put up with that bullshit from all faiths - whether its the anti-gay, anti-choice, anti-sex education, anti-science - you fucking name it. It's not the exclusive domain of the Islamic weirdos - all religious nutbags are at it. You counter that though with your fucking intellect (its not hard because their position is weak), not by actively trying to oppress their entire faith and all of the innocent followers of it, which as I said just adds fuel to a fucking fire!

PornDog wrote: ↑Mon Nov 02, 2020 11:16 am Its not worse - its bad, but its not worse.

We have to put up with that bullshit from all faiths - whether its the anti-gay, anti-choice, anti-sex education, anti-science - you fucking name it. It's not the exclusive domain of the Islamic weirdos - all religious nutbags are at it. You counter that though with your fucking intellect (its not hard because their position is weak), not by actively trying to oppress their entire faith and all of the innocent followers of it, which as I said just adds fuel to a fucking fire!

No one is being oppressed in France ....

And yes free speech is more important that hurty words.

I'm not arguing against free speech - I'm saying that sometimes dickheads are the ones to speak. I'm saying that if your objective is to generate reasoned debate they are doing it wrong. I'm saying that if they want to effect real change, they are doing it wrong. If they want to feed the culture clash and make a bad situation worse, then they are bang on target!

And yes, making a blanket un-nuanced insult against an entire faith is an oppressive act. There is no satire here - it was purely designed to offend. It's carried out within the bounds of free speech - its perfectly legal for them to do so - its just a stupid dick move is all!

PornDog wrote: ↑Mon Nov 02, 2020 11:42 am I'm not arguing against free speech - I'm saying that sometimes dickheads are the ones to speak. I'm saying that if your objective is to generate reasoned debate they are doing it wrong. I'm saying that if they want to effect real change, they are doing it wrong. If they want to feed the culture clash and make a bad situation worse, then they are bang on target!

And yes, making a blanket un-nuanced insult against an entire faith is an oppressive act. There is no satire here - it was purely designed to offend. It's carried out within the bounds of free speech - its perfectly legal for them to do so - its just a stupid dick move is all!

Free speech is exactly allowing “dickheads” their views.

The satire is real and continues. The point about “offence” is the point. Offence is taken not given. No idea has supremacy.

I'm not denying the dickheads their rights - I'm just exercising my rights to call them dickheads.

PornDog wrote: ↑Mon Nov 02, 2020 12:07 pm I'm not denying the dickheads their rights - I'm just exercising my rights to call them dickheads.

And I’ll die on the hill allowing that to be the case.

PornDog wrote: ↑Mon Nov 02, 2020 11:03 am

Of course not, but this isn't pandering - this is going out of your way to be deliberately insulting - to actively poke a finger in the eye of the entire religion is itself fucking stupid. You never changed anybody's opinion about anything by calling them a dick!

Whats worse is that you're not just challenging the extreme views within that religion, you're insulting all followers of that faith and sending them a very clear message that their faith is not welcome in your society. That's just pouring fuel onto a fire.

There are better ways to stoke debate on this subject than going for the nuclear option. This is no different to spilling a bunch of pigs blood in front of a Synagogue.

Reasoned debate has the ability to bring about change - two lines of assholes flinging shit at each other just spreads disease!

I'd be tempted to go along with that until I think of Monty python with The Life Of Brian. You could argue that was provocative and offensive (to the extent that it was banned in some countries) but now the idea seems silly and preposterous.

Uncle fester wrote: ↑Mon Nov 02, 2020 3:27 pm

PornDog wrote: ↑Mon Nov 02, 2020 11:03 am

Of course not, but this isn't pandering - this is going out of your way to be deliberately insulting - to actively poke a finger in the eye of the entire religion is itself fucking stupid. You never changed anybody's opinion about anything by calling them a dick!

Whats worse is that you're not just challenging the extreme views within that religion, you're insulting all followers of that faith and sending them a very clear message that their faith is not welcome in your society. That's just pouring fuel onto a fire.

There are better ways to stoke debate on this subject than going for the nuclear option. This is no different to spilling a bunch of pigs blood in front of a Synagogue.

Reasoned debate has the ability to bring about change - two lines of assholes flinging shit at each other just spreads disease!

I'd be tempted to go along with that until I think of Monty python with The Life Of Brian. You could argue that was provocative and offensive (to the extent that it was banned in some countries) but now the idea seems silly and preposterous.

Life of Brian is legitimate satire though. What's more, it isn't a critique of Christ or necessarily Christianity itself, but rather of Christian institutions and the misinterpretation and abuse of scripture/faith. It did inspire actual debate (quite famously of course).

The cartoon of Mohammad had one purpose and one purpose only - to stoke the flames in a clash of cultures. If they genuinely wanted to just have a debate then they failed miserably - all it did was draw battle lines. Maybe its the cynic in me, but I suspect they wanted a fight, not a debate. It's not, nor should it be, illegal, but its also not any noble step forward to try and create a better society - it was the exact opposite, a dick move aimed at stoking religious tensions!


And before anybody jumps on something I have not said - them picking the fight in no way justifies blah blah blah......you're a dick for even going there!

There were protests against the life of Brian in Britain some from the then Muslim community.

Of course there were - and I've no issue with those protesters (I do with the bans of course).

Like I said - it was legitimate satire. The equivalent would have been Cleese walking onto camera and saying "Joseph was a fag - Imagine not boning his wife! Queer as they come. Mary was a dirty slut as well - immaculate conception - she's a lying dirty slut cunt!" FIN

No laughs, no satire, no debate to be had - just a bunch of pricks being obnoxious!

PornDog wrote: ↑Mon Nov 02, 2020 11:03 am

JM2K6 wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 1:35 pm

PornDog wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 10:06 am

Jesus Christ - is this some white genocide thing!!!!!

While I've always known you held some strong anti-muslim feelings, that's full on bat shit crazy white supremacist racist talk!

Why on earth are you even remotely surprised? This is who DAC has been for at least the last ten years.

I guess I've never seen it so overtly put out there before!! I'm genuinely shocked by that - its US redneck amoeba like levels of intellect.

Openside wrote: ↑Sat Oct 31, 2020 12:11 am

JM2K6 wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 11:57 pm

So him endlessly repeating racist far-right talking points is OK in your book?

I am barely on the bored these days so haven't seen these 'racist talking points'. if you are referring to his fears re Islam frankly we should all be concerned about that.

The racist talking point is literally a few posts above yours!

Do you sympathise with his belief that the white race is currently going through a genocide?

It's dangerous batshit crazy lunatic talk and if you don't actively criticise it then you're an evil fucking cunt! There's no grey area with something as extreme as that!

Insane_Homer wrote: ↑Sat Oct 31, 2020 7:22 am

Muttonbird wrote: ↑Sat Oct 31, 2020 5:51 amIt's not a Catch 22. There is a solution. Don't project Charlie Hebdo cartoons on buildings would be a great start, ffs.

France. What a bunch of idiots.

Why? Should we now just pander to the religiously insane?

Of course not, but this isn't pandering - this is going out of your way to be deliberately insulting - to actively poke a finger in the eye of the entire religion is itself fucking stupid. You never changed anybody's opinion about anything by calling them a dick!

Whats worse is that you're not just challenging the extreme views within that religion, you're insulting all followers of that faith and sending them a very clear message that their faith is not welcome in your society. That's just pouring fuel onto a fire.

There are better ways to stoke debate on this subject than going for the nuclear option. This is no different to spilling a bunch of pigs blood in front of a Synagogue.

Reasoned debate has the ability to bring about change - two lines of assholes flinging shit at each other just spreads disease!

No I do not, having said that if I was a white SA farmer I would be armed to the teeth.

PornDog wrote: ↑Mon Nov 02, 2020 4:19 pm Of course there were - and I've no issue with those protesters (I do with the bans of course).

Like I said - it was legitimate satire. The equivalent would have been Cleese walking onto camera and saying "Joseph was a fag - Imagine not boning his wife! Queer as they come. Mary was a dirty slut as well - immaculate conception - she's a lying dirty slut cunt!" FIN

No laughs, no satire, no debate to be had - just a bunch of pricks being obnoxious!

Would you feel the need to cut their head off though??

So you do condemn DAC's racists posting!

That's good to hear. Took you long enough to get there though!

Openside wrote: ↑Mon Nov 02, 2020 4:29 pm

PornDog wrote: ↑Mon Nov 02, 2020 4:19 pm Of course there were - and I've no issue with those protesters (I do with the bans of course).

Like I said - it was legitimate satire. The equivalent would have been Cleese walking onto camera and saying "Joseph was a fag - Imagine not boning his wife! Queer as they come. Mary was a dirty slut as well - immaculate conception - she's a lying dirty slut cunt!" FIN

No laughs, no satire, no debate to be had - just a bunch of pricks being obnoxious!

Would you feel the need to cut their head off though??

And before anybody jumps on something I have not said - them picking the fight in no way justifies blah blah blah......you're a dick for even going there!

Dickhead!

PornDog wrote: ↑Mon Nov 02, 2020 4:19 pm Of course there were - and I've no issue with those protesters (I do with the bans of course).

Like I said - it was legitimate satire. The equivalent would have been Cleese walking onto camera and saying "Joseph was a fag - Imagine not boning his wife! Queer as they come. Mary was a dirty slut as well - immaculate conception - she's a lying dirty slut cunt!" FIN

No laughs, no satire, no debate to be had - just a bunch of pricks being obnoxious!

It’s what Hebdo do though , they’ve been there for generations .... also it really is satire when the response to being accused of being a violent nutter with medieval beliefs is to randomly kill people.

You certainly don’t get to be the judge.

PornDog wrote: ↑Mon Nov 02, 2020 4:34 pm So you do condemn DAC's racists posting!

That's good to hear. Took you long enough to get there though!

That is not what I said - I stated I didn't believe there was white genocide in SA. You have inferred the rest.

As I have previously stated I am unaware of DACs racist posting.

I certainly get to be the judge in my own mind - which all I've ever purported to be.

PornDog wrote: ↑Mon Nov 02, 2020 4:35 pm

Openside wrote: ↑Mon Nov 02, 2020 4:29 pm

PornDog wrote: ↑Mon Nov 02, 2020 4:19 pm Of course there were - and I've no issue with those protesters (I do with the bans of course).

Like I said - it was legitimate satire. The equivalent would have been Cleese walking onto camera and saying "Joseph was a fag - Imagine not boning his wife! Queer as they come. Mary was a dirty slut as well - immaculate conception - she's a lying dirty slut cunt!" FIN

No laughs, no satire, no debate to be had - just a bunch of pricks being obnoxious!

Would you feel the need to cut their head off though??

And before anybody jumps on something I have not said - them picking the fight in no way justifies blah blah blah......you're a dick for even going there!

Dickhead!

Interesting take

Openside wrote: ↑Mon Nov 02, 2020 4:37 pm

PornDog wrote: ↑Mon Nov 02, 2020 4:34 pm So you do condemn DAC's racists posting!

That's good to hear. Took you long enough to get there though!

That is not what I said - I stated I didn't believe there was white genocide in SA. You have inferred the rest.

As I have previously stated I am unaware of DACs racist posting.

You have been made aware of it and you have been asked for comment. To which you have responded by being deliberately obtuse!