Page 205 of 375
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Fri Feb 05, 2021 12:32 am
by Dinsdale Piranha
Ovals wrote: ↑Fri Feb 05, 2021 12:13 am
Ymx wrote: ↑Thu Feb 04, 2021 9:11 pm
Marylandolorian wrote: ↑Thu Feb 04, 2021 6:44 pm
Well, fuck that, turned well. last time I congratulate the brits
Don’t worry. Some just get quite upset when the govt are praised, and can’t be criticised on their handling of something.
The congrats was bound to attract some poison.
You think this is bad -
try reading the Planet Rugby thread - it's a real shit show and getting worse everyday as more and more ignorant trolls join in.
We've done brilliantly with the vaccine - it's been a huge success. Just a shame we'd done so crappily beforehand.
But at least there's room for optimism now - as long as Boris doesn't give way to the 1922 committee and end the lockdown.restrictions too soon. It's time to really put this thing to the sword now - I'm desperate to be able to see my Grandkids again - but I'd rather stay locked down for too long than too little.
The PR thread is quite fascinating in a car crash fashion. You have the full set, the Irish rubbing themselves raw at the prospect of problems in the UK, the obvious trolls on all sides (Russia, UK) The EU apologists. It's like an ensemble piece disaster movie.
I nearly posted there just to keep some of the crossover posters from infecting this thread.
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Fri Feb 05, 2021 12:39 am
by Ovals
Dinsdale Piranha wrote: ↑Fri Feb 05, 2021 12:32 am
Ovals wrote: ↑Fri Feb 05, 2021 12:13 am
Ymx wrote: ↑Thu Feb 04, 2021 9:11 pm
Don’t worry. Some just get quite upset when the govt are praised, and can’t be criticised on their handling of something.
The congrats was bound to attract some poison.
You think this is bad -
try reading the Planet Rugby thread - it's a real shit show and getting worse everyday as more and more ignorant trolls join in.
We've done brilliantly with the vaccine - it's been a huge success. Just a shame we'd done so crappily beforehand.
But at least there's room for optimism now - as long as Boris doesn't give way to the 1922 committee and end the lockdown.restrictions too soon. It's time to really put this thing to the sword now - I'm desperate to be able to see my Grandkids again - but I'd rather stay locked down for too long than too little.
The PR thread is quite fascinating in a car crash fashion. You have the full set, the Irish rubbing themselves raw at the prospect of problems in the UK, the obvious trolls on all sides (Russia, UK) The EU apologists. It's like an ensemble piece disaster movie.
I nearly posted there just to keep some of the crossover posters from infecting this thread.
Our success with the vaccine has sent the thread into meltdown - The swarm really haven't taken it well.
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Fri Feb 05, 2021 6:26 am
by Enzedder
JM2K6 wrote: ↑Thu Feb 04, 2021 5:13 pm
Marylandolorian wrote: ↑Thu Feb 04, 2021 4:47 pm
Good job UK, in regards of the vaccine, pretty sure that a growing number of people are happy not be part of the EU right now.
Covid-19 is going to be a Waterloo or Austerlitz for a lot of governments.
Given we've gone past 120k deaths I don't think it's quite that simple.
And yet the voters seem to have forgotten/forgiven based on that earlier poll result. Seems to be a weird result, or is it because Labour are so bad there?
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Fri Feb 05, 2021 6:43 am
by Paddington Bear
Ovals wrote: ↑Fri Feb 05, 2021 12:39 am
Dinsdale Piranha wrote: ↑Fri Feb 05, 2021 12:32 am
Ovals wrote: ↑Fri Feb 05, 2021 12:13 am
You think this is bad -
try reading the Planet Rugby thread - it's a real shit show and getting worse everyday as more and more ignorant trolls join in.
We've done brilliantly with the vaccine - it's been a huge success. Just a shame we'd done so crappily beforehand.
But at least there's room for optimism now - as long as Boris doesn't give way to the 1922 committee and end the lockdown.restrictions too soon. It's time to really put this thing to the sword now - I'm desperate to be able to see my Grandkids again - but I'd rather stay locked down for too long than too little.
The PR thread is quite fascinating in a car crash fashion. You have the full set, the Irish rubbing themselves raw at the prospect of problems in the UK, the obvious trolls on all sides (Russia, UK) The EU apologists. It's like an ensemble piece disaster movie.
I nearly posted there just to keep some of the crossover posters from infecting this thread.
Our success with the vaccine has sent the thread into meltdown - The swarm really haven't taken it well.
The unabashed gloating when the UK’s death rate was higher than Ireland’s was horrendously distasteful, a great advert for being here
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Fri Feb 05, 2021 6:43 am
by Paddington Bear
Enzedder wrote: ↑Fri Feb 05, 2021 6:26 am
JM2K6 wrote: ↑Thu Feb 04, 2021 5:13 pm
Marylandolorian wrote: ↑Thu Feb 04, 2021 4:47 pm
Good job UK, in regards of the vaccine, pretty sure that a growing number of people are happy not be part of the EU right now.
Covid-19 is going to be a Waterloo or Austerlitz for a lot of governments.
Given we've gone past 120k deaths I don't think it's quite that simple.
And yet the voters seem to have forgotten/forgiven based on that earlier poll result. Seems to be a weird result, or is it because Labour are so bad there?
The latter. Labour have looked just as indecisive and jumpy
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Fri Feb 05, 2021 7:34 am
by Ymx
Another nail in the coffin
France furious as Britain snatches Covid vaccine Valneva deal from under its nose
February 5 2021, The Times
A French vaccine financed by Britain is at the centre of a row over the Macron government’s failure to ensure supplies for its people.
The French government refused to fully fund research by Valneva, a Franco-Austrian startup that has developed its vaccine at its headquarters near Nantes in the Loire region.
Instead, the British backed the development, securing an agreement to supply 60 million doses from a plant in Livingston, West Lothian, starting in October. France will get the vaccine only next year.
Franck Grimaud, the company’s chief executive, said that several governments had been contacted at the launch of the project. “The UK responded the fastest,” he said.
“In large part no doubt because we already had a base there and also because they believed straight away in our ‘inactivated’ vaccine. They took all the risks . . . and immediately forwarded €96 million to use before the end of December. It’s logical that, under contract, we undertook to deliver to them first.”
“Inactivated” vaccines are considered to have advantages over “live” ones because they can boost previous vaccinations. Critics in France said the failure by Paris to back Valneva was symbolic of the government’s poor management of the vaccine race, in which Britain has stolen a march.
Sanofi, France’s pharmaceutical champion, has failed to produce a vaccine yet. After pooling its procurement with the EU in Brussels, France is suffering a shortage of supplies of the Pfizer-Biontec, Moderna and forthcoming Astrazeneca vaccines.
The conservative, far right and leftwing opposition to President Macron’s centrist administration said that the Valneva situation was a symptom of France’s failure to back its own research and development despite the country’s long history as a medical pioneer.
The far-right National Rally, led by Marine Le Pen, said: “We are above all paying for the abandonment of our sovereignty in favour of other emerging powers in globalisation.”
The party claimed that French know-how and talent was leaving the country. The government said it fully supported Valneva’s work and argued that Sanofi’s vaccine would probably be available before the smaller firm’s serum. The Valneva product is still undergoing clinical trials.
Agnès Pannier-Runacher, the minister for industry, said that the government had negotiated with Valneva from April but the company had received a favourable offer from Britain.
Media reports said that the UK offered a total of €470 million. French laws against 100 per cent state financing of private enterprises hampered the talks with the company.
Nadine Levratto, an economist and a director at the National Centre for Scientific Research, suggested Britain offered more than France or the EU because it was suffering more than others from the pandemic.
Jean Castex, the French prime minister, said last night that the vaccination drive would be sped up.
An extra 1.7 million vaccine appointments would be offered “in the coming days”, he said. So far only 1.6 million people have received a first dose, far below Britain and Germany.
This week Mr Macron pledged that by the end of August all French people would have been offered a vaccination.
Mr Castex said that though the coronavirus situation remained delicate, there was no need for another national lockdown.
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Fri Feb 05, 2021 8:51 am
by JM2K6
Paddington Bear wrote: ↑Fri Feb 05, 2021 6:43 am
Enzedder wrote: ↑Fri Feb 05, 2021 6:26 am
JM2K6 wrote: ↑Thu Feb 04, 2021 5:13 pm
Given we've gone past 120k deaths I don't think it's quite that simple.
And yet the voters seem to have forgotten/forgiven based on that earlier poll result. Seems to be a weird result, or is it because Labour are so bad there?
The latter. Labour have looked just as indecisive and jumpy
Errrrr
I'm pretty sure that's nonsense. Labour have been consistent in their views (ignoring the fact that you can't be indecisive if you're not the ones who can make the decisions) and what does jumpy even mean in this context?
The tories are winning the poll battle because they're a populist government with a captive media and a huge amount of free airtime with their briefings.
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Fri Feb 05, 2021 9:05 am
by robmatic
JM2K6 wrote: ↑Fri Feb 05, 2021 8:51 am
Paddington Bear wrote: ↑Fri Feb 05, 2021 6:43 am
Enzedder wrote: ↑Fri Feb 05, 2021 6:26 am
And yet the voters seem to have forgotten/forgiven based on that earlier poll result. Seems to be a weird result, or is it because Labour are so bad there?
The latter. Labour have looked just as indecisive and jumpy
Errrrr
I'm pretty sure that's nonsense. Labour have been consistent in their views (ignoring the fact that you can't be indecisive if you're not the ones who can make the decisions) and what does jumpy even mean in this context?
The tories are winning the poll battle because they're a populist government with a captive media and a huge amount of free airtime with their briefings.
We probably shouldn't underestimate that Boris does have that personal popularity as well.
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Fri Feb 05, 2021 9:06 am
by Saint
Ymx wrote: ↑Fri Feb 05, 2021 7:34 am
Another nail in the coffin
France furious as Britain snatches Covid vaccine Valneva deal from under its nose
February 5 2021, The Times
A French vaccine financed by Britain is at the centre of a row over the Macron government’s failure to ensure supplies for its people.
The French government refused to fully fund research by Valneva, a Franco-Austrian startup that has developed its vaccine at its headquarters near Nantes in the Loire region.
Instead, the British backed the development, securing an agreement to supply 60 million doses from a plant in Livingston, West Lothian, starting in October. France will get the vaccine only next year.
Franck Grimaud, the company’s chief executive, said that several governments had been contacted at the launch of the project. “The UK responded the fastest,” he said.
“In large part no doubt because we already had a base there and also because they believed straight away in our ‘inactivated’ vaccine. They took all the risks . . . and immediately forwarded €96 million to use before the end of December. It’s logical that, under contract, we undertook to deliver to them first.”
“Inactivated” vaccines are considered to have advantages over “live” ones because they can boost previous vaccinations. Critics in France said the failure by Paris to back Valneva was symbolic of the government’s poor management of the vaccine race, in which Britain has stolen a march.
Sanofi, France’s pharmaceutical champion, has failed to produce a vaccine yet. After pooling its procurement with the EU in Brussels, France is suffering a shortage of supplies of the Pfizer-Biontec, Moderna and forthcoming Astrazeneca vaccines.
The conservative, far right and leftwing opposition to President Macron’s centrist administration said that the Valneva situation was a symptom of France’s failure to back its own research and development despite the country’s long history as a medical pioneer.
The far-right National Rally, led by Marine Le Pen, said: “We are above all paying for the abandonment of our sovereignty in favour of other emerging powers in globalisation.”
The party claimed that French know-how and talent was leaving the country. The government said it fully supported Valneva’s work and argued that Sanofi’s vaccine would probably be available before the smaller firm’s serum. The Valneva product is still undergoing clinical trials.
Agnès Pannier-Runacher, the minister for industry, said that the government had negotiated with Valneva from April but the company had received a favourable offer from Britain.
Media reports said that the UK offered a total of €470 million. French laws against 100 per cent state financing of private enterprises hampered the talks with the company.
Nadine Levratto, an economist and a director at the National Centre for Scientific Research, suggested Britain offered more than France or the EU because it was suffering more than others from the pandemic.
Jean Castex, the French prime minister, said last night that the vaccination drive would be sped up.
An extra 1.7 million vaccine appointments would be offered “in the coming days”, he said. So far only 1.6 million people have received a first dose, far below Britain and Germany.
This week Mr Macron pledged that by the end of August all French people would have been offered a vaccination.
Mr Castex said that though the coronavirus situation remained delicate, there was no need for another national lockdown.
The French arguments here don't really make a lot of sense to me - they didn't fund Valneva because they thought Sanofi would produce first? Haven't they heard of backing more than one horse?
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Fri Feb 05, 2021 9:39 am
by Lobby
Saint wrote: ↑Fri Feb 05, 2021 9:06 am
Ymx wrote: ↑Fri Feb 05, 2021 7:34 am
Another nail in the coffin
France furious as Britain snatches Covid vaccine Valneva deal from under its nose
February 5 2021, The Times
A French vaccine financed by Britain is at the centre of a row over the Macron government’s failure to ensure supplies for its people.
The French government refused to fully fund research by Valneva, a Franco-Austrian startup that has developed its vaccine at its headquarters near Nantes in the Loire region.
Instead, the British backed the development, securing an agreement to supply 60 million doses from a plant in Livingston, West Lothian, starting in October. France will get the vaccine only next year.
Franck Grimaud, the company’s chief executive, said that several governments had been contacted at the launch of the project. “The UK responded the fastest,” he said.
“In large part no doubt because we already had a base there and also because they believed straight away in our ‘inactivated’ vaccine. They took all the risks . . . and immediately forwarded €96 million to use before the end of December. It’s logical that, under contract, we undertook to deliver to them first.”
“Inactivated” vaccines are considered to have advantages over “live” ones because they can boost previous vaccinations. Critics in France said the failure by Paris to back Valneva was symbolic of the government’s poor management of the vaccine race, in which Britain has stolen a march.
Sanofi, France’s pharmaceutical champion, has failed to produce a vaccine yet. After pooling its procurement with the EU in Brussels, France is suffering a shortage of supplies of the Pfizer-Biontec, Moderna and forthcoming Astrazeneca vaccines.
The conservative, far right and leftwing opposition to President Macron’s centrist administration said that the Valneva situation was a symptom of France’s failure to back its own research and development despite the country’s long history as a medical pioneer.
The far-right National Rally, led by Marine Le Pen, said: “We are above all paying for the abandonment of our sovereignty in favour of other emerging powers in globalisation.”
The party claimed that French know-how and talent was leaving the country. The government said it fully supported Valneva’s work and argued that Sanofi’s vaccine would probably be available before the smaller firm’s serum. The Valneva product is still undergoing clinical trials.
Agnès Pannier-Runacher, the minister for industry, said that the government had negotiated with Valneva from April but the company had received a favourable offer from Britain.
Media reports said that the UK offered a total of €470 million. French laws against 100 per cent state financing of private enterprises hampered the talks with the company.
Nadine Levratto, an economist and a director at the National Centre for Scientific Research, suggested Britain offered more than France or the EU because it was suffering more than others from the pandemic.
Jean Castex, the French prime minister, said last night that the vaccination drive would be sped up.
An extra 1.7 million vaccine appointments would be offered “in the coming days”, he said. So far only 1.6 million people have received a first dose, far below Britain and Germany.
This week Mr Macron pledged that by the end of August all French people would have been offered a vaccination.
Mr Castex said that though the coronavirus situation remained delicate, there was no need for another national lockdown.
The French arguments here don't really make a lot of sense to me - they didn't fund Valneva because they thought Sanofi would produce first? Haven't they heard of backing more than one horse?
Also, as the EU has yet to even sign a letter of intent with Valneva, you must wonder what the hell they've been doing if they've been negotiating with Valneva since last April. The fact they've signed up with the UK doesn't stop France or the EU from also ordering vaccines from them.
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Fri Feb 05, 2021 9:44 am
by Lobby
It appears that not everyone in Germany is convinced by Merkel's recent comments that the EU's vaccination strategy is correct
Germany’s finance minister has attacked the European commission’s Covid vaccine strategy as “really shit”, Bild has reported, as Angela Merkel’s centre-left coalition partners seek to exploit anger over the issue before federal elections.
Olaf Scholz, who is also the vice-chancellor, reportedly criticised the commission president, Ursula von der Leyen, by name during a cabinet meeting on Monday, saying Berlin could not “let this shit repeat itself” and that the vaccine debacle was “a disgrace”.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/ ... s-disgrace
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Fri Feb 05, 2021 9:56 am
by tc27
Jesus that PR thread
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Fri Feb 05, 2021 10:00 am
by SaintK
Excellent article by Katy Balls in The Spectator on how and why the vaccine taskforce has been so successful
It does beg the question as to why PPE and Test Track and Trace was so badly handled and has wasted £billions
Until a few weeks ago, the government’s track record on Covid was one of repeated failure. The death toll, the depth of the recession, the public disapproval of the government: Britain’s figures were among the worst in the world. But with vaccines, things have changed. The UK is now on track to be the first major country in the world to vaccinate its way out of lockdown.
https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/se ... cess/amp
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Fri Feb 05, 2021 10:03 am
by Raggs
SaintK wrote: ↑Fri Feb 05, 2021 10:00 am
Excellent article by Katy Balls in The Spectator on how and why the vaccine taskforce has been so successful
It does beg the question as to why PPE and Test Track and Trace was so badly handled and has wasted £billions
Until a few weeks ago, the government’s track record on Covid was one of repeated failure. The death toll, the depth of the recession, the public disapproval of the government: Britain’s figures were among the worst in the world. But with vaccines, things have changed. The UK is now on track to be the first major country in the world to vaccinate its way out of lockdown.
https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/se ... cess/amp
I don't think billions were wasted, I think billions were gifted. Much harder to try and give away bullshit contracts for vaccines than it is for ppe.
For me it shows this government have the potential to be good at their jobs, but are happier to just keep giving cash to friends, and helping set themselves up for after their time in power.
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Fri Feb 05, 2021 10:17 am
by Saint
tc27 wrote: ↑Fri Feb 05, 2021 9:56 am
Jesus that PR thread
Yeah, it's a bit nuts isn't
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Fri Feb 05, 2021 11:00 am
by Insane_Homer
James Absolutelynotsocleverlydumbass
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Fri Feb 05, 2021 11:18 am
by Ymx
Saint wrote: ↑Fri Feb 05, 2021 10:17 am
tc27 wrote: ↑Fri Feb 05, 2021 9:56 am
Jesus that PR thread
Yeah, it's a bit nuts isn't
Any particular page or named shitfight worth reading for the shits and giggles.
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Fri Feb 05, 2021 11:20 am
by SaintK
Insane_Homer wrote: ↑Fri Feb 05, 2021 11:00 am
James Absolutelynotsocleverlydumbass
Yet another scheme that we are weeks behind on because of dither and delay and poor decision m aking
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Fri Feb 05, 2021 11:23 am
by Saint
Ymx wrote: ↑Fri Feb 05, 2021 11:18 am
Saint wrote: ↑Fri Feb 05, 2021 10:17 am
tc27 wrote: ↑Fri Feb 05, 2021 9:56 am
Jesus that PR thread
Yeah, it's a bit nuts isn't
Any particular page or named shitfight worth reading for the shits and giggles.
There's really far too much to single out any single area
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Fri Feb 05, 2021 11:27 am
by SaintK
Ymx wrote: ↑Fri Feb 05, 2021 11:18 am
Saint wrote: ↑Fri Feb 05, 2021 10:17 am
tc27 wrote: ↑Fri Feb 05, 2021 9:56 am
Jesus that PR thread
Yeah, it's a bit nuts isn't
Any particular page or named shitfight worth reading for the shits and giggles.
The Brexit and Coronavirus threads are just about unreadable largely thanks to the swarm, Backrow (and his bid to become a comedian) and Message# who appears to have more free time on his hands than is good for him and a few new multis like Sputnik who have recently joined in the headbanging!
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Fri Feb 05, 2021 11:41 am
by Biffer
SaintK wrote: ↑Fri Feb 05, 2021 10:00 am
Excellent article by Katy Balls in The Spectator on how and why the vaccine taskforce has been so successful
It does beg the question as to why PPE and Test Track and Trace was so badly handled and has wasted £billions
Until a few weeks ago, the government’s track record on Covid was one of repeated failure. The death toll, the depth of the recession, the public disapproval of the government: Britain’s figures were among the worst in the world. But with vaccines, things have changed. The UK is now on track to be the first major country in the world to vaccinate its way out of lockdown.
https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/se ... cess/amp
Key difference is one is private provision of healthcare goods and services and the other is public sector / third sector led.
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Fri Feb 05, 2021 11:45 am
by tc27
SaintK wrote: ↑Fri Feb 05, 2021 11:27 am
Ymx wrote: ↑Fri Feb 05, 2021 11:18 am
Saint wrote: ↑Fri Feb 05, 2021 10:17 am
Yeah, it's a bit nuts isn't
Any particular page or named shitfight worth reading for the shits and giggles.
The Brexit and Coronavirus threads are just about unreadable largely thanks to the swarm, Backrow (and his bid to become a comedian) and Message# who appears to have more free time on his hands than is good for him and a few new multis like Sputnik who have recently joined in the headbanging!
Pretty much this - also from what I can gather the Brit haters/swarm are now focusing hard on bashing the AZ vaccine 'useless monkey virus'.
Someone created a multi called 'Sputnik V' with a shirtless Putin as the avatar.
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Fri Feb 05, 2021 11:48 am
by dpedin
SaintK wrote: ↑Fri Feb 05, 2021 11:20 am
Insane_Homer wrote: ↑Fri Feb 05, 2021 11:00 am
James Absolutelynotsocleverlydumbass
Yet another scheme that we are weeks behind on because of dither and delay and poor decision m aking
Agreed - we have had genomic sequencing since the start of the pandemic and have over 100,000 deaths. UoA study shows international travel is biggest indicators of country performance in managing of spread and deaths! One of the biggest GDP drops in the world. NZ has closed borders and has less deaths in total than we have each day at the moment and now has a fully functioning economy. They must think we are stupid!
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Fri Feb 05, 2021 11:51 am
by Saint
tc27 wrote: ↑Fri Feb 05, 2021 11:45 am
SaintK wrote: ↑Fri Feb 05, 2021 11:27 am
Ymx wrote: ↑Fri Feb 05, 2021 11:18 am
Any particular page or named shitfight worth reading for the shits and giggles.
The Brexit and Coronavirus threads are just about unreadable largely thanks to the swarm, Backrow (and his bid to become a comedian) and Message# who appears to have more free time on his hands than is good for him and a few new multis like Sputnik who have recently joined in the headbanging!
Pretty much this - also from what I can gather the Brit haters/swarm are now focusing hard on bashing the AZ vaccine 'useless monkey virus'.
Someone created a multi called 'Sputnik V' with a shirtless Putin as the avatar.
Yeah, I saw that - had to laugh about people worried about the long term effects of chimpanzee adenoviruses when they've been actually infecting humans for centuries.
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Fri Feb 05, 2021 11:57 am
by Lobby
I was looking for some more information on which vaccines have been approved in which countries and found this site, which I thought might be of interest:
https://covid19.trackvaccines.org/vaccines/
Includes details of stage of development, clinical trials, and approvals for all the vaccine candidates.
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Fri Feb 05, 2021 11:58 am
by JM2K6
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Fri Feb 05, 2021 1:18 pm
by Biffer
tc27 wrote: ↑Fri Feb 05, 2021 11:45 am
SaintK wrote: ↑Fri Feb 05, 2021 11:27 am
Ymx wrote: ↑Fri Feb 05, 2021 11:18 am
Any particular page or named shitfight worth reading for the shits and giggles.
The Brexit and Coronavirus threads are just about unreadable largely thanks to the swarm, Backrow (and his bid to become a comedian) and Message# who appears to have more free time on his hands than is good for him and a few new multis like Sputnik who have recently joined in the headbanging!
Pretty much this - also from what I can gather the Brit haters/swarm are now focusing hard on bashing the AZ vaccine 'useless monkey virus'.
Someone created a multi called 'Sputnik V' with a shirtless Putin as the avatar.
Man, that's dumb on so many levels. The whole point is that it's a useless monkey virus. That's what makes it safe to carry the material that provokes the immune response.
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Fri Feb 05, 2021 1:19 pm
by Ovals
robmatic wrote: ↑Fri Feb 05, 2021 9:05 am
JM2K6 wrote: ↑Fri Feb 05, 2021 8:51 am
Paddington Bear wrote: ↑Fri Feb 05, 2021 6:43 am
The latter. Labour have looked just as indecisive and jumpy
Errrrr
I'm pretty sure that's nonsense. Labour have been consistent in their views (ignoring the fact that you can't be indecisive if you're not the ones who can make the decisions) and what does jumpy even mean in this context?
The tories are winning the poll battle because they're a populist government with a captive media and a huge amount of free airtime with their briefings.
We probably shouldn't underestimate that Boris does have that personal popularity as well.
JM is correct
Boris's approval rating is pretty poor - something like -20%. He'll get a bounce from the 'feel good factor' when things start getting back to normal - after that he might have an uphill task as other problems have to be solved.
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Fri Feb 05, 2021 1:24 pm
by SaintK
Left hand not knowing what right hand is doing or saying...................yet again!!
We reported earlier that the Cabinet Office said all UK adults aged 50 and over should receive a coronavirus vaccine by the start of May.
However, Downing Street dismissed the timetable in the government document – which said the first nine priority groups of people should have been offered a coronavirus vaccine by early May – prompting renewed confusion over the expected date.
Any programme for reopening the economy depends on the speed of what is officially termed phase 1 of the vaccination programme, which takes in the top nine groups by vulnerability to the virus, going as far as all adults aged 50 and above.
No 10 has said only that the target to reach this milestone is “spring”, refusing repeatedly to be more precise.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021 ... -schedule
Fuck me, they are so fucking useless at comms
[media]
[/media]
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Fri Feb 05, 2021 1:33 pm
by Biffer
SaintK wrote: ↑Fri Feb 05, 2021 1:24 pm
Left hand not knowing what right hand is doing or saying...................yet again!!
We reported earlier that the Cabinet Office said all UK adults aged 50 and over should receive a coronavirus vaccine by the start of May.
However, Downing Street dismissed the timetable in the government document – which said the first nine priority groups of people should have been offered a coronavirus vaccine by early May – prompting renewed confusion over the expected date.
Any programme for reopening the economy depends on the speed of what is officially termed phase 1 of the vaccination programme, which takes in the top nine groups by vulnerability to the virus, going as far as all adults aged 50 and above.
No 10 has said only that the target to reach this milestone is “spring”, refusing repeatedly to be more precise.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021 ... -schedule
Fuck me, they are so fucking useless at comms
[media]
[/media]
Yeah, this language of 'eligible' and 'offered' is deliberate obfuscation, as Thommo seems to have found out.
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Fri Feb 05, 2021 1:45 pm
by Paddington Bear
Ovals wrote: ↑Fri Feb 05, 2021 1:19 pm
robmatic wrote: ↑Fri Feb 05, 2021 9:05 am
JM2K6 wrote: ↑Fri Feb 05, 2021 8:51 am
Errrrr
I'm pretty sure that's nonsense. Labour have been consistent in their views (ignoring the fact that you can't be indecisive if you're not the ones who can make the decisions) and what does jumpy even mean in this context?
The tories are winning the poll battle because they're a populist government with a captive media and a huge amount of free airtime with their briefings.
We probably shouldn't underestimate that Boris does have that personal popularity as well.
JM is correct
Boris's approval rating is pretty poor - something like -20%. He'll get a bounce from the 'feel good factor' when things start getting back to normal - after that he might have an uphill task as other problems have to be solved.
Boris' approval rating is misleading though, he's marmite so being -20 doesn't matter to him so much so long as he has dedicated fans. It is more of an issue for a Milliband/Cameron, and I suspect, Starmer type.
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Fri Feb 05, 2021 2:09 pm
by Openside
JM2K6 wrote: ↑Fri Feb 05, 2021 8:51 am
Paddington Bear wrote: ↑Fri Feb 05, 2021 6:43 am
Enzedder wrote: ↑Fri Feb 05, 2021 6:26 am
And yet the voters seem to have forgotten/forgiven based on that earlier poll result. Seems to be a weird result, or is it because Labour are so bad there?
The latter. Labour have looked just as indecisive and jumpy
Errrrr
I'm pretty sure that's nonsense. Labour have been consistent in their views
(ignoring the fact that you can't be indecisive if you're not the ones who can make the decisions) and what does jumpy even mean in this context?
The tories are winning the poll battle because they're a populist government with a captive media and a huge amount of free airtime with their briefings.
That isn't true, you might not be able to act on your decisions but it doesn't stop them being able to be made otherwise why would the Opposition bother with a position at all (even if it is with the government)
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Fri Feb 05, 2021 2:13 pm
by tc27
Really feels like its going up a gear this week with the biggest days yet to come if the pattern repeats.
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Fri Feb 05, 2021 2:20 pm
by Marylandolorian
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Fri Feb 05, 2021 2:37 pm
by Ovals
Paddington Bear wrote: ↑Fri Feb 05, 2021 1:45 pm
Ovals wrote: ↑Fri Feb 05, 2021 1:19 pm
robmatic wrote: ↑Fri Feb 05, 2021 9:05 am
We probably shouldn't underestimate that Boris does have that personal popularity as well.
JM is correct
Boris's approval rating is pretty poor - something like -20%. He'll get a bounce from the 'feel good factor' when things start getting back to normal - after that he might have an uphill task as other problems have to be solved.
Boris' approval rating is misleading though, he's marmite so being -20 doesn't matter to him so much so long as he has dedicated fans. It is more of an issue for a Milliband/Cameron, and I suspect, Starmer type.
As was Corbyn !!!!
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Fri Feb 05, 2021 2:37 pm
by sturginho
"The event was in breach of the curfew, and there were also problems with masks and social distancing," an investigator said.
Gimp outfits don't count as face coverings?
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Fri Feb 05, 2021 2:48 pm
by Sandstorm
Another typical argument on Twatter:
I wonder who J McIntyre is on here....?
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Fri Feb 05, 2021 3:19 pm
by Tattie
tc27 wrote: ↑Fri Feb 05, 2021 2:13 pm
Really feels like its going up a gear this week with the biggest days yet to come if the pattern repeats.
Impressive figures for Scotland and Wales - particularly Wales.
That must be about 1.3% of over 16s in Wales in a single day and about 1.1% in Scotland
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Fri Feb 05, 2021 3:29 pm
by JM2K6
Openside wrote: ↑Fri Feb 05, 2021 2:09 pm
JM2K6 wrote: ↑Fri Feb 05, 2021 8:51 am
Paddington Bear wrote: ↑Fri Feb 05, 2021 6:43 am
The latter. Labour have looked just as indecisive and jumpy
Errrrr
I'm pretty sure that's nonsense. Labour have been consistent in their views
(ignoring the fact that you can't be indecisive if you're not the ones who can make the decisions) and what does jumpy even mean in this context?
The tories are winning the poll battle because they're a populist government with a captive media and a huge amount of free airtime with their briefings.
That isn't true, you might not be able to act on your decisions but it doesn't stop them being able to be made otherwise why would the Opposition bother with a position at all (even if it is with the government)
That's not being indecisive, that's not taking a position.
It's a bollocks criticism either way you look at it. Starmer has chosen his battlegrounds and been consistent with his demands and his criticisms. The fact that he's chosen not to go after the Govt on certain things doesn't make him or Labour "indecisive or jumpy" - it's a decision they've made for political reasons.
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Fri Feb 05, 2021 3:55 pm
by tc27
Encouraging data from Israel: