Re: President Biden and US politics catchall
Posted: Wed Nov 13, 2024 9:09 am
Heh, a question for the legal eagles. If a president has the power of pardon then does another president have the power to unpardon?
A place where escape goats go to play
https://notplanetrugby.com/
Nope.Flockwitt wrote: Wed Nov 13, 2024 9:09 am Heh, a question for the legal eagles. If a president has the power of pardon then does another president have the power to unpardon?
My question was rhetorical in spirit, as I expected pretty much what you described.Biffer wrote: Wed Nov 13, 2024 9:04 amEven if there are, Trumps previous administration and his previous statements mean they’ll ride over them and carry on regardless. If it’s turns out to be criminal, Trump will pardon everyone and tell them to continue.
Second term and even if he changes term limits somehow, he probably won't be able to go for another so he'll never need to sell reelection ever again.Slick wrote: Wed Nov 13, 2024 7:57 am I guess it’s in my nature to give folk a chance and I hoped that for all his campaign bluster he would be a bit more moderate and sensible in power. Also hoped he would be true to form and shaft everyone who helped him. But, no, this is a bit of a nightmare unfolding.
Which offences?inactionman wrote: Wed Nov 13, 2024 9:26 amNope.Flockwitt wrote: Wed Nov 13, 2024 9:09 am Heh, a question for the legal eagles. If a president has the power of pardon then does another president have the power to unpardon?
Although I've no idea if prosecutors could re-prosecute.
I'm wondering if certain people in New York and elsewhere might wait until Trump is no longer president before looking again at certain offences.
The actual answer is that Senate Repulicans are blocking the appointment of a new chief ethics law enforcement officer so that Trump can install his own crony.Kiwias wrote: Wed Nov 13, 2024 10:25 amMy question was rhetorical in spirit, as I expected pretty much what you described.Biffer wrote: Wed Nov 13, 2024 9:04 amEven if there are, Trumps previous administration and his previous statements mean they’ll ride over them and carry on regardless. If it’s turns out to be criminal, Trump will pardon everyone and tell them to continue.Kiwias wrote: Wed Nov 13, 2024 9:00 am
The obvious question is: aren't there rules and regulations in place governing blatant and obvious conflicts of interest?
Reflects Musk's attitude that this is just a bit of fun, all just a game.Hal Jordan wrote: Wed Nov 13, 2024 12:47 pmThe actual answer is that Senate Repulicans are blocking the appointment of a new chief ethics law enforcement officer so that Trump can install his own crony.Kiwias wrote: Wed Nov 13, 2024 10:25 amMy question was rhetorical in spirit, as I expected pretty much what you described.Biffer wrote: Wed Nov 13, 2024 9:04 am
Even if there are, Trumps previous administration and his previous statements mean they’ll ride over them and carry on regardless. If it’s turns out to be criminal, Trump will pardon everyone and tell them to continue.
Also :Department of Government Efficiency = D.O.G.E. as Musk himself has Tweeted.
It's going to be time to nail wooden boards across America and paint a red cross on it. It would be laughable if it wasn't such a human tragedy in the long term.
The irony that a man who thinks he should get paid $40 billion has been put in charge of efficiency.Biffer wrote: Wed Nov 13, 2024 8:28 am Musk's efficiency will involve cutiing NASA and NOAA massively ang giving contracts to himself.
True, and the fact that it has also gone completely to shit is I'm sure nothing to do with him at all...inactionman wrote: Wed Nov 13, 2024 3:29 pm He was pretty good at cutting costs at twitter, if that's all they're taking efficiency to mean.
There's so much value now!tabascoboy wrote: Wed Nov 13, 2024 4:16 pmTrue, and the fact that it has also gone completely to shit is I'm sure nothing to do with him at all...inactionman wrote: Wed Nov 13, 2024 3:29 pm He was pretty good at cutting costs at twitter, if that's all they're taking efficiency to mean.
Twitter going down the shitter is all the fault of the meanie big boys who wouldn't stump up for the advertising space.tabascoboy wrote: Wed Nov 13, 2024 4:16 pmTrue, and the fact that it has also gone completely to shit is I'm sure nothing to do with him at all...inactionman wrote: Wed Nov 13, 2024 3:29 pm He was pretty good at cutting costs at twitter, if that's all they're taking efficiency to mean.
It's almost definitely what they are taking efficiency to mean, lots of sackings followed by lots of resignations as it becomes a shit show.inactionman wrote: Wed Nov 13, 2024 3:29 pm He was pretty good at cutting costs at twitter, if that's all they're taking efficiency to mean.
I'm betting on somebody not making it to the end of 2024, i.e. gone before they even get into office.Flockwitt wrote: Wed Nov 13, 2024 4:58 pm So what are the odds of someone in Trump's cabinet not lasting through 2025?
Compare the rabble that's being assemble vs. Biden's stable group with genuine rock stars in it like Jina Riamondo![]()
Flockwitt wrote: Wed Nov 13, 2024 4:58 pm So what are the odds of someone in Trump's cabinet not lasting through 2025?
He will be fine. Kicking back watching Fox till 12 when he steps out to tell his minions what do from what he’s seen on the news, then goes to implement his latest cash scheme while Miller and co get on with running things. He’ll be untouchable until the mid-terms.Guy Smiley wrote: Wed Nov 13, 2024 9:38 pmFlockwitt wrote: Wed Nov 13, 2024 4:58 pm So what are the odds of someone in Trump's cabinet not lasting through 2025?
What are the odds on Trump not making it through 2 years?
Only the best people.Flockwitt wrote: Wed Nov 13, 2024 9:35 pm Matt Gaetz for attorney general.
You. Could. Not. Make. It. Up.
Not sure how else to respond to this madness, fret and fume for the next four years?lemonhead wrote: Wed Nov 13, 2024 10:29 pmStrongly suspect this will not be something to laugh at very soon, if it even is now.
Can't quite manage it.
I don't know. He has the whole world laughing at him - apart from those poor buggers in the US. There's nothing else we can do, to be honest.lemonhead wrote: Wed Nov 13, 2024 10:29 pmStrongly suspect this will not be something to laugh at very soon, if it even is now.
Can't quite manage it.
They don't exactly have a huge pool of competent individuals to fish in - most of the sensible Republicans have deserted ship or wouldn't pledge undying loyalty to the Orange Gibbon. It has strong parallels to the death throes of Tory Party where, after the Blonde Bbumbelcunts purge of the party, if you could stand up, talk and didn't have a record of sexual abuse/fraud etc then you were given a ministerial position or even Co-Chair of the Party. It won't end well for Trumps reign but there again he doesnt give a shit about that, all he wants is to stay out of jail and make loads of more money from the state.Kiwias wrote: Thu Nov 14, 2024 1:17 am You know he is purely taking the piss with Gabbard as DNI and Gaetz as AG, just sitting there watching the frenzy and reveling in it.
Spot on there, mate. I was almost expecting him to nominate Trey Gowdy as the AG.dpedin wrote: Thu Nov 14, 2024 9:16 amThey don't exactly have a huge pool of competent individuals to fish in - most of the sensible Republicans have deserted ship or wouldn't pledge undying loyalty to the Orange Gibbon. It has strong parallels to the death throes of Tory Party where, after the Blonde Bbumbelcunts purge of the party, if you could stand up, talk and didn't have a record of sexual abuse/fraud etc then you were given a ministerial position or even Co-Chair of the Party. It won't end well for Trumps reign but there again he doesnt give a shit about that, all he wants is to stay out of jail and make loads of more money from the state.Kiwias wrote: Thu Nov 14, 2024 1:17 am You know he is purely taking the piss with Gabbard as DNI and Gaetz as AG, just sitting there watching the frenzy and reveling in it.
Tbh, I don't think Trump thinks about things at that level. These will simply be the people who've brown-nosed him sufficiently.Kiwias wrote: Thu Nov 14, 2024 1:17 am You know he is purely taking the piss with Gabbard as DNI and Gaetz as AG, just sitting there watching the frenzy and reveling in it.
I reckon Noem made it on the back of her utterly gormless appearance on the stage when he just played music and swayed for 30mins.sockwithaticket wrote: Thu Nov 14, 2024 11:03 amTbh, I don't think Trump thinks about things at that level. These will simply be the people who've brown-nosed him sufficiently.Kiwias wrote: Thu Nov 14, 2024 1:17 am You know he is purely taking the piss with Gabbard as DNI and Gaetz as AG, just sitting there watching the frenzy and reveling in it.
Hard to make a case against them for stopping advertising on X when he himself told them this:inactionman wrote: Wed Nov 13, 2024 4:26 pmTwitter going down the shitter is all the fault of the meanie big boys who wouldn't stump up for the advertising space.tabascoboy wrote: Wed Nov 13, 2024 4:16 pmTrue, and the fact that it has also gone completely to shit is I'm sure nothing to do with him at all...inactionman wrote: Wed Nov 13, 2024 3:29 pm He was pretty good at cutting costs at twitter, if that's all they're taking efficiency to mean.
I'll admit I've lost track of where his antitrust suit has gone, it could even have been laughed out of court by now.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cn47798gxx4o
For a free speech free market libertarian, he's not very free speech, free market nor very libertarian.
.
It just makes his resort to legal action even more ridiculous.Kiwias wrote: Thu Nov 14, 2024 12:22 pmHard to make a case against them for stopping advertising on X when he himself told them this:inactionman wrote: Wed Nov 13, 2024 4:26 pmTwitter going down the shitter is all the fault of the meanie big boys who wouldn't stump up for the advertising space.tabascoboy wrote: Wed Nov 13, 2024 4:16 pm
True, and the fact that it has also gone completely to shit is I'm sure nothing to do with him at all...
I'll admit I've lost track of where his antitrust suit has gone, it could even have been laughed out of court by now.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cn47798gxx4o
For a free speech free market libertarian, he's not very free speech, free market nor very libertarian.
.
https://www.theverge.com/2023/11/29/239 ... -destroy-x
That even sounds like an Onion article.laurent wrote: Thu Nov 14, 2024 3:09 pm The Onion bought Infowars , looks like things are getting interesting in the US...![]()
It's real.Biffer wrote: Thu Nov 14, 2024 3:23 pmThat even sounds like an Onion article.laurent wrote: Thu Nov 14, 2024 3:09 pm The Onion bought Infowars , looks like things are getting interesting in the US...![]()
They're planning to relaunch as a parody site taking the shit out of people like Jones. A few more years and I'll have trouble following what's real anymore.
It won't be in his name, & if it earns any money then that will go to the families too, as selling everything isn't going to discharge the debt he owesUncle fester wrote: Thu Nov 14, 2024 4:40 pmIt's real.Biffer wrote: Thu Nov 14, 2024 3:23 pmThat even sounds like an Onion article.laurent wrote: Thu Nov 14, 2024 3:09 pm The Onion bought Infowars , looks like things are getting interesting in the US...![]()
They're planning to relaunch as a parody site taking the shit out of people like Jones. A few more years and I'll have trouble following what's real anymore.
The Onion buys rightwing conspiracy theory site Infowars with plans to make it ‘very funny, very stupid’ https://www.theguardian.com/media/2024/ ... re_btn_url
Maybe I'm not understanding what Infowars is but have they just paid money for a YouTube channel that has the name Infowars?
How does this help? Jones will just start up a different channel and his fan base will move over there.