Afghanistan: that turned out well
Posted: Fri Aug 13, 2021 8:07 am
Expect civil war and Al Qaeda to re-emerge.
A place where escape goats go to play
https://notplanetrugby.com/
If it provides a breeding ground for an Al Qaeda upsurge, the Yanks might yet come to regret this.
The regular ANA/ANP forces weren't interested even when ISAF troops were there physically mentoring them they were a bag of shite. They were more interested in smoking weed than carrying out patrols.
This is a pretty good analysis. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/ ... n-rumsfeld
There a link missing Brazil?Brazil wrote: ↑Fri Aug 13, 2021 9:13 amThis is a pretty good analysis. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/ ... n-rumsfeld
Essentially the imbalance in quality across the ANSF and strategic errors in spreading themselves too thin in the face of the Taliban insurgency has resulted in a collapse on all fronts. The Afghan veterans on the board will have a better perspective.
On that article - there's some irony in Kagan holding forth given his thinktank was one of the architects of Bush's little imperial adventures in the first place, but him and his brother are the sort of strategic thinkers that always rely on the uncertainty of events ensuring they're never wrong (and the petro-dollars can keep rolling in).
Doesn't matter how good their leaders are (they're often not though and corruption is rife) when the soldiers will empty a belt at nothing in particular before running away.
It was amusing when the Danes were thinking of banning their servicemen in ISAF from having porn, for fear of offending local sensibilities. A booty I knew pointed out that after the bacon from the ration packs, the porn was the first thing the Afghan solidiers nicked.Jock42 wrote: ↑Fri Aug 13, 2021 9:13 amThe regular ANA/ANP forces weren't interested even when ISAF troops were there physically mentoring them they were a bag of shite. They were more interested in smoking weed than carrying out patrols.
Their SF however, were quite impressive but they had a stricter selection criteria as you'd imagine.
That doesn't bring into it the tribal factors. Troops were displaced from their homeland to fight in another province a lot of the time too.
Same as Vietnam. Complex mix of
never heard that about the Danes.Brazil wrote: ↑Fri Aug 13, 2021 9:54 amIt was amusing when the Danes were thinking of banning their servicemen in ISAF from having porn, for fear of offending local sensibilities. A booty I knew pointed out that after the bacon from the ration packs, the porn was the first thing the Afghan solidiers nicked.Jock42 wrote: ↑Fri Aug 13, 2021 9:13 amThe regular ANA/ANP forces weren't interested even when ISAF troops were there physically mentoring them they were a bag of shite. They were more interested in smoking weed than carrying out patrols.
Their SF however, were quite impressive but they had a stricter selection criteria as you'd imagine.
That doesn't bring into it the tribal factors. Troops were displaced from their homeland to fight in another province a lot of the time too.
I shouldn't be surprised but it's a f**king disgrace. You could read Daniel Ellsberg's Secrets or watch Ken Burns' The Vietnam War and substitute Afghanistan for Vietnam in every f**k up made in Indo China bar the illegal expansion of the war into neighbouring countries: and even here, the US had a bit of a nibble in Pakistan.Brazil wrote: ↑Fri Aug 13, 2021 9:13 amThis is a pretty good analysis. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/ ... n-rumsfeld
Essentially the imbalance in quality across the ANSF and strategic errors in spreading themselves too thin in the face of the Taliban insurgency has resulted in a collapse on all fronts. The Afghan veterans on the board will have a better perspective.
On that article - there's some irony in Kagan holding forth given his thinktank was one of the architects of Bush's little imperial adventures in the first place, but him and his brother are the sort of strategic thinkers that always rely on the uncertainty of events ensuring they're never wrong (and the petro-dollars can keep rolling in).
I'll have a look for that. I was going to ask what had happened to the militias, but from his feed it looks like they're just changing sides to avoid the hassle of fighting. What wouldn't the Afghans give for an Ahmed Shah Massoud now?Jock42 wrote: ↑Fri Aug 13, 2021 10:11 am An Intimate War by Dr Mike Martin has been recommended, he's also worth a follow on twitter (@ThreshedThought).
I've ordered it but not sure I can bring myself to read much more anytime soon. The news is fucking shite enough atm. Can't seem to stop refreshing feeds though
Or a TE Lawrence.Brazil wrote: ↑Fri Aug 13, 2021 10:21 amI'll have a look for that. I was going to ask what had happened to the militias, but from his feed it looks like they're just changing sides to avoid the hassle of fighting. What wouldn't the Afghans give for an Ahmed Shah Massoud now?Jock42 wrote: ↑Fri Aug 13, 2021 10:11 am An Intimate War by Dr Mike Martin has been recommended, he's also worth a follow on twitter (@ThreshedThought).
I've ordered it but not sure I can bring myself to read much more anytime soon. The news is fucking shite enough atm. Can't seem to stop refreshing feeds though
Bilal Sarwary too. Journalist in Kabul.Brazil wrote: ↑Fri Aug 13, 2021 10:21 amI'll have a look for that. I was going to ask what had happened to the militias, but from his feed it looks like they're just changing sides to avoid the hassle of fighting. What wouldn't the Afghans give for an Ahmed Shah Massoud now?Jock42 wrote: ↑Fri Aug 13, 2021 10:11 am An Intimate War by Dr Mike Martin has been recommended, he's also worth a follow on twitter (@ThreshedThought).
I've ordered it but not sure I can bring myself to read much more anytime soon. The news is fucking shite enough atm. Can't seem to stop refreshing feeds though
It does seem very 'Scandinavian' to include porn in ration packs.Jock42 wrote: ↑Fri Aug 13, 2021 9:58 amnever heard that about the Danes.Brazil wrote: ↑Fri Aug 13, 2021 9:54 amIt was amusing when the Danes were thinking of banning their servicemen in ISAF from having porn, for fear of offending local sensibilities. A booty I knew pointed out that after the bacon from the ration packs, the porn was the first thing the Afghan solidiers nicked.Jock42 wrote: ↑Fri Aug 13, 2021 9:13 am
The regular ANA/ANP forces weren't interested even when ISAF troops were there physically mentoring them they were a bag of shite. They were more interested in smoking weed than carrying out patrols.
Their SF however, were quite impressive but they had a stricter selection criteria as you'd imagine.
That doesn't bring into it the tribal factors. Troops were displaced from their homeland to fight in another province a lot of the time too.
Probably best to go to war with Iran now, just in case?FalseBayFC wrote: ↑Fri Aug 13, 2021 11:48 am The only way to stop this is to neuter Iran and Saudi Arabia somehow. Pretty sure they're behind most of the misery in the Islamic countries. I also wonder how the Chinese role in Afghanistan will affect developments there.
Given the origins of the Taliban, and the double game they've played throughout the entire conflict, Pakistan would make more sense. Iran aren't particularly big fans of the Taliban IIRC because they're Sunnis not Shiites, and their border is pretty secure. They're also far more preocuppied with Israel interdicting their oil shipments to Syria.Sandstorm wrote: ↑Fri Aug 13, 2021 11:50 amProbably best to go to war with Iran now, just in case?FalseBayFC wrote: ↑Fri Aug 13, 2021 11:48 am The only way to stop this is to neuter Iran and Saudi Arabia somehow. Pretty sure they're behind most of the misery in the Islamic countries. I also wonder how the Chinese role in Afghanistan will affect developments there.
Well they've been invaded almost non-stop for the past 2000 years. The Brits, Indians, Ruskies and Yanks have occupied the country for most of the last 200 years. They've been forced to become a nation of fighters. Don't actually ever recall any aggressions aimed outside their borders tbf. Al Qaida was based in Afghan but was really an Arab thing.Sandstorm wrote: ↑Fri Aug 13, 2021 11:42 am Meh; the Afghans are war whores, fighting anyone and everyone for cash. Tribal bandits. They've been this way for 2000 years. It's one of those places on Earth where it's just better to pretend doesn't exist and stay clear.
The very occasional jab outside their borders at the rest of us should be expected and then ignored.
Sux to be a woman, child or donkey over there, but they don't help themselves as a nation either.
Alexander the great says helloFalseBayFC wrote: ↑Fri Aug 13, 2021 11:56 amWell they've been invaded almost non-stop for the past 2000 years. The Brits, Indians, Ruskies and Yanks have occupied the country for most of the last 200 years. They've been forced to become a nation of fighters. Don't actually ever recall any aggressions aimed outside their borders tbf. Al Qaida was based in Afghan but was really an Arab thing.Sandstorm wrote: ↑Fri Aug 13, 2021 11:42 am Meh; the Afghans are war whores, fighting anyone and everyone for cash. Tribal bandits. They've been this way for 2000 years. It's one of those places on Earth where it's just better to pretend doesn't exist and stay clear.
The very occasional jab outside their borders at the rest of us should be expected and then ignored.
Sux to be a woman, child or donkey over there, but they don't help themselves as a nation either.
I was thinking about the greater middle-east and the way that the Iran-Turkey-Saudi power struggle affects the localized conflicts. There are just so many factors at play here I guess. Then there are the Chinese and Indian influences which complicate things even more.Brazil wrote: ↑Fri Aug 13, 2021 11:53 amGiven the origins of the Taliban, and the double game they've played throughout the entire conflict, Pakistan would make more sense. Iran aren't particularly big fans of the Taliban IIRC because they're Sunnis not Shiites, and their border is pretty secure. They're also far more preocuppied with Israel interdicting their oil shipments to Syria.Sandstorm wrote: ↑Fri Aug 13, 2021 11:50 amProbably best to go to war with Iran now, just in case?FalseBayFC wrote: ↑Fri Aug 13, 2021 11:48 am The only way to stop this is to neuter Iran and Saudi Arabia somehow. Pretty sure they're behind most of the misery in the Islamic countries. I also wonder how the Chinese role in Afghanistan will affect developments there.
FalseBayFC wrote: ↑Fri Aug 13, 2021 12:01 pmI was thinking about the greater middle-east and the way that the Iran-Turkey-Saudi power struggle affects the localized conflicts. There are just so many factors at play here I guess. Then there are the Chinese and Indian influences which complicate things even more.Brazil wrote: ↑Fri Aug 13, 2021 11:53 amGiven the origins of the Taliban, and the double game they've played throughout the entire conflict, Pakistan would make more sense. Iran aren't particularly big fans of the Taliban IIRC because they're Sunnis not Shiites, and their border is pretty secure. They're also far more preocuppied with Israel interdicting their oil shipments to Syria.
Absolutely not. The US led interventions into the region have been disastrous. But the Soviets are even more to blame. Their invasion really destroyed any hope the Afghanis had.Sandstorm wrote: ↑Fri Aug 13, 2021 11:50 amProbably best to go to war with Iran now, just in case?FalseBayFC wrote: ↑Fri Aug 13, 2021 11:48 am The only way to stop this is to neuter Iran and Saudi Arabia somehow. Pretty sure they're behind most of the misery in the Islamic countries. I also wonder how the Chinese role in Afghanistan will affect developments there.
You know what...I would hope that the US's intelligence gathering services are ahead of it. Our intelligence services couldn't predict a mass looting and billions of Rands damage with it advertised openly on social media.Torquemada 1420 wrote: ↑Fri Aug 13, 2021 8:20 amIf it provides a breeding ground for an Al Qaeda upsurge, the Yanks might yet come to regret this.
Pffft! Genghis Khan made Alexander the Great look like the Peace Corps in Afghan.Happyhooker wrote: ↑Fri Aug 13, 2021 12:00 pmAlexander the great says helloFalseBayFC wrote: ↑Fri Aug 13, 2021 11:56 amWell they've been invaded almost non-stop for the past 2000 years. The Brits, Indians, Ruskies and Yanks have occupied the country for most of the last 200 years. They've been forced to become a nation of fighters. Don't actually ever recall any aggressions aimed outside their borders tbf. Al Qaida was based in Afghan but was really an Arab thing.Sandstorm wrote: ↑Fri Aug 13, 2021 11:42 am Meh; the Afghans are war whores, fighting anyone and everyone for cash. Tribal bandits. They've been this way for 2000 years. It's one of those places on Earth where it's just better to pretend doesn't exist and stay clear.
The very occasional jab outside their borders at the rest of us should be expected and then ignored.
Sux to be a woman, child or donkey over there, but they don't help themselves as a nation either.