So NPR vs PR
Posted: Wed Aug 26, 2020 7:34 pm
will you slither back to PR or embrace the undiscovered country that is NPR?
Page 1 of 1
Re: So NPR vs PR
Posted: Wed Aug 26, 2020 7:35 pm
I'll use both. Irish rugby thread will have more traffic on PR. NAMA thread is 50/50 between PR and NPR
Re: So NPR vs PR
Posted: Wed Aug 26, 2020 7:50 pm
Staying here..
Re: So NPR vs PR
Posted: Wed Aug 26, 2020 7:54 pm
I’m staying here.
Re: So NPR vs PR
Posted: Wed Aug 26, 2020 8:48 pm
I like here but think the poll needs a ‘Both’ option.
Edit: when I read the poll I see it says “primary forum”
Edit: when I read the poll I see it says “primary forum”
Re: So NPR vs PR
Posted: Wed Aug 26, 2020 8:57 pm
Gav seems to be missing
Re: So NPR vs PR
Posted: Wed Aug 26, 2020 9:12 pm
It seemed like my account was mucked up, my password was changed, but I couldn't get a recovery email. I assume I was booted after saying unkind things (here, not even there).
So definitely here for me. Occassionally check PR, maybe once a week.
So definitely here for me. Occassionally check PR, maybe once a week.
Re: So NPR vs PR
Posted: Wed Aug 26, 2020 9:17 pm
I like it here. Might look in on PR but if I have to choose NPR is quids in.
Re: So NPR vs PR
Posted: Wed Aug 26, 2020 9:19 pm
Same old bunch of super arrogant twats.
Re: So NPR vs PR
Posted: Wed Aug 26, 2020 9:24 pm
Mostly here but there are a couple of threads over there I would like to keep in touch with.
Re: So NPR vs PR
Posted: Wed Aug 26, 2020 9:59 pm
Why are you here then?..
Re: So NPR vs PR
Posted: Wed Aug 26, 2020 10:02 pm
This is like getting in on Amazon at $7 a share back in 1998.
The smart money stays at NPR.
The smart money stays at NPR.
Re: So NPR vs PR
Posted: Wed Aug 26, 2020 10:04 pm
Re: So NPR vs PR
Posted: Wed Aug 26, 2020 10:09 pm
This is the unemployed/unemployable lad that flounced from PR a few years ago?blackblackblack wrote: ↑Wed Aug 26, 2020 10:04 pmIt's refry, he's possibly got nowhere else to be.
Re: So NPR vs PR
Posted: Wed Aug 26, 2020 10:15 pm
Yeah I know it's Refry, somehow he thinks that being a valleys boy holds no future and everyone else is to blame, well, shit me sideways, I'm a Llanelli boy, moved away and did ok, back in the homestead for the time being, doing guess what, a carer for my parents due to Covid. All us Taff's are not as downbeat...blackblackblack wrote: ↑Wed Aug 26, 2020 10:04 pmIt's refry, he's possibly got nowhere else to be.
Re: So NPR vs PR
Posted: Wed Aug 26, 2020 10:53 pm
Honestly this place is way better.
Plus you can say oops and plum.
Cheers ASMO
Plus you can say oops and plum.
Cheers ASMO
Re: So NPR vs PR
Posted: Thu Aug 27, 2020 1:12 am
This is a far better setup in every respect.
Re: So NPR vs PR
Posted: Thu Aug 27, 2020 1:58 am
Re: So NPR vs PR
Posted: Thu Aug 27, 2020 4:47 am
You can say fuck and cunt too, I suspect one of those nasty mods is yanking your chain and changed your text
Re: So NPR vs PR
Posted: Thu Aug 27, 2020 7:45 am
I'm posting on both but have ditched the Forum thingy. That seems to be dominated by 2 posters with their array of multis
Re: So NPR vs PR
Posted: Thu Aug 27, 2020 8:23 am
Strong showing for NPR in the poll-lets hope it becomes a reality 
Re: So NPR vs PR
Posted: Thu Aug 27, 2020 8:28 am
Can we rename F365 Cesspit as The Short Bus?
Re: So NPR vs PR
Posted: Thu Aug 27, 2020 9:14 am
I don't think PR is too bad. What is there will become normal after a while and you won't notice it.
Jake did most of the work on his own and he's never been trained up on that. I think it's a bloody good effort considering...
Jake did most of the work on his own and he's never been trained up on that. I think it's a bloody good effort considering...
Re: So NPR vs PR
Posted: Thu Aug 27, 2020 10:05 am
Hopefully he gets repaid with a few 6N blags on account of his ritin' skillz.
Re: So NPR vs PR
Posted: Thu Aug 27, 2020 10:15 am
Re: So NPR vs PR
Posted: Thu Aug 27, 2020 10:47 am
I'm sure he did. He refers to himself as Sefton
Re: So NPR vs PR
Posted: Thu Aug 27, 2020 10:57 am
I’ve used PR imploding and going shit, to wean myself off daft forums. As I’m wfh now I finish my work quicker and then go play with the kids or watch telly or something away from a screen.
PR now looks weird and little activity
This place looks a bit too gappy on my phone and also seems extremely quiet on activity
Had a brief look at the f365 lifeboat , it’s the best looking forum to me, sadly even though it’s amusing in places, it’s way too lefty racist thick chav sexist even for me. The rugby subforum
There has like 1000 posts or something tiny.
The sum of all the above 3 , is miles down on what PR was a year or two ago.
PR now looks weird and little activity
This place looks a bit too gappy on my phone and also seems extremely quiet on activity
Had a brief look at the f365 lifeboat , it’s the best looking forum to me, sadly even though it’s amusing in places, it’s way too lefty racist thick chav sexist even for me. The rugby subforum
There has like 1000 posts or something tiny.
The sum of all the above 3 , is miles down on what PR was a year or two ago.
Re: So NPR vs PR
Posted: Thu Aug 27, 2020 11:08 am
I'd stay here but it feels like half the threads are just talking about PR and the other half are just rehashing opinions, arguments and discussions started on PR anyway.
Re: So NPR vs PR
Posted: Thu Aug 27, 2020 11:21 am
You're right. fuck off and stay there.eldanielfire wrote: ↑Thu Aug 27, 2020 11:08 am I'd stay here but it feels like half the threads are just talking about PR and the other half are just rehashing opinions, arguments and discussions started on PR anyway.
Re: So NPR vs PR
Posted: Thu Aug 27, 2020 11:38 am
Call it what you like but there’s a slow decay in most groups over time... people's interests or priorities change and all the rest of it so individuals either succumb to that, wither in some way and perish... or find a way to regenerate themselves.eldanielfire wrote: ↑Thu Aug 27, 2020 11:08 am I'd stay here but it feels like half the threads are just talking about PR and the other half are just rehashing opinions, arguments and discussions started on PR anyway.
We do these things. The PR group is that same... it’s been on the fade for years and a lot of the core group seem to be living in denial of that. There’s a constant rehashing of tired old themes, some of which have their place and continue to deliver humour and value while others are stale, old and boring. Any sort of exodus to a lifeboat such as this place, as welcome as it is will also have its carry over effect with that core group trying to hang onto the known, the familiar, the safe and easy.
This is what humans seem to do. The other thing we do is complain about it.
Re: So NPR vs PR
Posted: Thu Aug 27, 2020 11:47 am
Shanky’s mate wrote: ↑Thu Aug 27, 2020 11:38 amCall it what you like but there’s a slow decay in most groups over time... people's interests or priorities change and all the rest of it so individuals either succumb to that, wither in some way and perish... or find a way to regenerate themselves.eldanielfire wrote: ↑Thu Aug 27, 2020 11:08 am I'd stay here but it feels like half the threads are just talking about PR and the other half are just rehashing opinions, arguments and discussions started on PR anyway.
We do these things. The PR group is that same... it’s been on the fade for years and a lot of the core group seem to be living in denial of that. There’s a constant rehashing of tired old themes, some of which have their place and continue to deliver humour and value while others are stale, old and boring. Any sort of exodus to a lifeboat such as this place, as welcome as it is will also have its carry over effect with that core group trying to hang onto the known, the familiar, the safe and easy.
This is what humans seem to do. The other thing we do is complain about it.
Can't disagree. In fact I've seen a few forums in much the same state.
I said some years ago that PRs staleness problem was to get a new influx of players you need to have accounts connected to social media to log-in easily.
Re: So NPR vs PR
Posted: Thu Aug 27, 2020 4:06 pm
When we get a reasonable rugby schedule back on we should see what the split is. There are definitely more poster on PR who really should have a break for a while. And not just for 1/2 an hour but perhaps a few weeks. Oh okay, I’ll say it. There are some real nutters who have found a home there.
Re: So NPR vs PR
Posted: Thu Aug 27, 2020 5:10 pm
Hey guys it’s an opportunity. Let’s be positive n’est pas? I didn’t know I could drink two gallons until challenged to do so.
(Note to self - must finish the motivational speaking correspondence course.)
(Note to self - must finish the motivational speaking correspondence course.)
Re: So NPR vs PR
Posted: Thu Aug 27, 2020 7:35 pm
Re: So NPR vs PR
Posted: Fri Aug 28, 2020 5:24 am
He should've asked for help then, I'm sure ASMO or the like would've helped him.
Re: So NPR vs PR
Posted: Fri Aug 28, 2020 7:40 am
I am a shallow man and so my reason for liking NPR is not what one might call profound.
Finally I get to use the icon-sized piccie of Crofty as my avatar; a piccie I sourced and shrank years ago but which still was unusable on PR.
Finally I get to use the icon-sized piccie of Crofty as my avatar; a piccie I sourced and shrank years ago but which still was unusable on PR.
Re: So NPR vs PR
Posted: Fri Aug 28, 2020 7:50 am
To be honest, it's not the best quality mate
Re: So NPR vs PR
Posted: Fri Aug 28, 2020 7:54 am
Not surprising. I had to strip the shite out of the pixel count to get it with cooee of the PR limit, yet it still failed.
I might look on my other MBP for the piccie of Brett Sheehan with a monkey on his shoulder...
Re: So NPR vs PR
Posted: Fri Aug 28, 2020 8:13 am
Or simply find and reset a similar image.MungoMan wrote: ↑Fri Aug 28, 2020 7:54 amNot surprising. I had to strip the shite out of the pixel count to get it with cooee of the PR limit, yet it still failed.
I might look on my other MBP for the piccie of Brett Sheehan with a monkey on his shoulder...