Climate Change Thread
A big year coming up for Scotland hosting COP26 in Glasgow - although I’ve no idea how they are going to cope.
UK have just announced they will no longer fund oil & gas or coal projects around the world - don’t necessarily agree with this completely
Biden getting the USA back involved
UK, EU and UN hosting a virtual summit this week: UK to cut emissions by 68%, EU by 55% - Australia have committed to stop lying and been told that’s not enough and asked not to attend...
Climate change: UK to end aid for fossil fuel projects abroad https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-55276769
UK have just announced they will no longer fund oil & gas or coal projects around the world - don’t necessarily agree with this completely
Biden getting the USA back involved
UK, EU and UN hosting a virtual summit this week: UK to cut emissions by 68%, EU by 55% - Australia have committed to stop lying and been told that’s not enough and asked not to attend...
Climate change: UK to end aid for fossil fuel projects abroad https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-55276769
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
All of the restrictions, all the reduction in travel, the decrease of industrial activity, and that reduced global emissions by a mere 7%.
Shows me that we need more than just changes in behaviour, we need fundamental changes to society and the infrastructures of our economies.
Shows me that we need more than just changes in behaviour, we need fundamental changes to society and the infrastructures of our economies.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
Technology is always the answer.Biffer wrote: ↑Sat Dec 12, 2020 11:25 am All of the restrictions, all the reduction in travel, the decrease of industrial activity, and that reduced global emissions by a mere 7%.
Shows me that we need more than just changes in behaviour, we need fundamental changes to society and the infrastructures of our economies.
Changing behaviour will take too long - better just to get scientists and politicians on a climate war footing (including funding) and see what they come up with.
Throw some reforestation in, and we’ll be grand.
It might be added, if needed, I know very little about climate change.
I just know that humans aren’t great at behaving their way out of the shit we get ourselves into, so if it isn’t tech, we’re proper screwed!
Yup, most people just don’t give a fuck.Random1 wrote: ↑Sat Dec 12, 2020 3:43 pmTechnology is always the answer.Biffer wrote: ↑Sat Dec 12, 2020 11:25 am All of the restrictions, all the reduction in travel, the decrease of industrial activity, and that reduced global emissions by a mere 7%.
Shows me that we need more than just changes in behaviour, we need fundamental changes to society and the infrastructures of our economies.
Changing behaviour will take too long - better just to get scientists and politicians on a climate war footing (including funding) and see what they come up with.
Throw some reforestation in, and we’ll be grand.
It might be added, if needed, I know very little about climate change.
I just know that humans aren’t great at behaving their way out of the shit we get ourselves into, so if it isn’t tech, we’re proper screwed!
Biffer, also surprised and disappointed that it was only 7% and of course everyone was back in their car to travel 1/2 mile as soon as they could
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
As renewables get more affordable there will be a natural progression towards them.
I read somewhere that the US emissions have dropped further than Europe largely because of fracking and the greater use of natural gas. But that has a limited life span.
I read somewhere that the US emissions have dropped further than Europe largely because of fracking and the greater use of natural gas. But that has a limited life span.
We're fudged, aren't we?Slick wrote: ↑Sat Dec 12, 2020 4:24 pmYup, most people just don’t give a fuck.Random1 wrote: ↑Sat Dec 12, 2020 3:43 pmTechnology is always the answer.Biffer wrote: ↑Sat Dec 12, 2020 11:25 am All of the restrictions, all the reduction in travel, the decrease of industrial activity, and that reduced global emissions by a mere 7%.
Shows me that we need more than just changes in behaviour, we need fundamental changes to society and the infrastructures of our economies.
Changing behaviour will take too long - better just to get scientists and politicians on a climate war footing (including funding) and see what they come up with.
Throw some reforestation in, and we’ll be grand.
It might be added, if needed, I know very little about climate change.
I just know that humans aren’t great at behaving their way out of the shit we get ourselves into, so if it isn’t tech, we’re proper screwed!
Biffer, also surprised and disappointed that it was only 7% and of course everyone was back in their car to travel 1/2 mile as soon as they could
No, because I completely agree with Random that technology will get us out of this.
Frankly, what worries me more is the amount of shit we are putting in the sea. I go most Sunday’s litter picking on the beach with my son and we can easily get a bin bag full of plastic and other assorted crap in 30 minutes
Frankly, what worries me more is the amount of shit we are putting in the sea. I go most Sunday’s litter picking on the beach with my son and we can easily get a bin bag full of plastic and other assorted crap in 30 minutes
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
This year will be the first time that the weight of man made matter is greater than the weight of organic matter.Slick wrote: ↑Sat Dec 12, 2020 10:14 pm No, because I completely agree with Random that technology will get us out of this.
Frankly, what worries me more is the amount of shit we are putting in the sea. I go most Sunday’s litter picking on the beach with my son and we can easily get a bin bag full of plastic and other assorted crap in 30 minutes
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
Christ that’s a scary stat!Biffer wrote: ↑Sat Dec 12, 2020 10:31 pmThis year will be the first time that the weight of man made matter is greater than the weight of organic matter.Slick wrote: ↑Sat Dec 12, 2020 10:14 pm No, because I completely agree with Random that technology will get us out of this.
Frankly, what worries me more is the amount of shit we are putting in the sea. I go most Sunday’s litter picking on the beach with my son and we can easily get a bin bag full of plastic and other assorted crap in 30 minutes
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
-
- Posts: 8665
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 11:48 am
Wish I were that optimistic.Tech alone will not stop established behaviours, practices and so on that underpin our massive issue. Huge government involvement is required to subsidise and disseminate the tech at the and legislate to curb harmful action at the pace required. They've yet to show any appetitie for doing that.Slick wrote: ↑Sat Dec 12, 2020 10:14 pm No, because I completely agree with Random that technology will get us out of this.
Frankly, what worries me more is the amount of shit we are putting in the sea. I go most Sunday’s litter picking on the beach with my son and we can easily get a bin bag full of plastic and other assorted crap in 30 minutes
I'm just hoping things don't get too apocalyptic before I die.
What are the behaviours you’re thinking about?sockwithaticket wrote: ↑Sat Dec 12, 2020 11:00 pmWish I were that optimistic.Tech alone will not stop established behaviours, practices and so on that underpin our massive issue. Huge government involvement is required to subsidise and disseminate the tech at the and legislate to curb harmful action at the pace required. They've yet to show any appetitie for doing that.Slick wrote: ↑Sat Dec 12, 2020 10:14 pm No, because I completely agree with Random that technology will get us out of this.
Frankly, what worries me more is the amount of shit we are putting in the sea. I go most Sunday’s litter picking on the beach with my son and we can easily get a bin bag full of plastic and other assorted crap in 30 minutes
I'm just hoping things don't get too apocalyptic before I die.
I’m struggling to think of one where there isn’t a load of activity and research into tech designed to mitigate human aresholery
Ah, now, I’m newish to the bored and PR, so are you one of the respected posters?Slick wrote: ↑Sat Dec 12, 2020 10:14 pm No, because I completely agree with Random that technology will get us out of this.
Frankly, what worries me more is the amount of shit we are putting in the sea. I go most Sunday’s litter picking on the beach with my son and we can easily get a bin bag full of plastic and other assorted crap in 30 minutes
Or are you one of those trump follower people?
No problem either way, just curious as to what cohort I’ve fallen into.
Meat eating.Random1 wrote: ↑Sat Dec 12, 2020 11:52 pmWhat are the behaviours you’re thinking about?sockwithaticket wrote: ↑Sat Dec 12, 2020 11:00 pmWish I were that optimistic.Tech alone will not stop established behaviours, practices and so on that underpin our massive issue. Huge government involvement is required to subsidise and disseminate the tech at the and legislate to curb harmful action at the pace required. They've yet to show any appetitie for doing that.Slick wrote: ↑Sat Dec 12, 2020 10:14 pm No, because I completely agree with Random that technology will get us out of this.
Frankly, what worries me more is the amount of shit we are putting in the sea. I go most Sunday’s litter picking on the beach with my son and we can easily get a bin bag full of plastic and other assorted crap in 30 minutes
I'm just hoping things don't get too apocalyptic before I die.
I’m struggling to think of one where there isn’t a load of activity and research into tech designed to mitigate human aresholery
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
I’m kind of the darling poster of both bords, respected and feared in equal measure.Random1 wrote: ↑Sat Dec 12, 2020 11:56 pmAh, now, I’m newish to the bored and PR, so are you one of the respected posters?Slick wrote: ↑Sat Dec 12, 2020 10:14 pm No, because I completely agree with Random that technology will get us out of this.
Frankly, what worries me more is the amount of shit we are putting in the sea. I go most Sunday’s litter picking on the beach with my son and we can easily get a bin bag full of plastic and other assorted crap in 30 minutes
Or are you one of those trump follower people?
No problem either way, just curious as to what cohort I’ve fallen into.
You have done well my son.
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
Wot? No bacon?Biffer wrote: ↑Sun Dec 13, 2020 8:53 amMeat eating.Random1 wrote: ↑Sat Dec 12, 2020 11:52 pmWhat are the behaviours you’re thinking about?sockwithaticket wrote: ↑Sat Dec 12, 2020 11:00 pm
Wish I were that optimistic.Tech alone will not stop established behaviours, practices and so on that underpin our massive issue. Huge government involvement is required to subsidise and disseminate the tech at the and legislate to curb harmful action at the pace required. They've yet to show any appetitie for doing that.
I'm just hoping things don't get too apocalyptic before I die.
I’m struggling to think of one where there isn’t a load of activity and research into tech designed to mitigate human aresholery
That's great, but their emissions are still something like 3 times greater per capita.
I don't know the impacts of each of these things versus some of the massive producers like factories, but can't see individual attitudes shifting on (including my own, if I'm honest, though I have a smaller carbon footprint than most where I live, I think) ...Biffer wrote: ↑Sun Dec 13, 2020 8:53 amMeat eating.Random1 wrote: ↑Sat Dec 12, 2020 11:52 pmWhat are the behaviours you’re thinking about?sockwithaticket wrote: ↑Sat Dec 12, 2020 11:00 pm
Wish I were that optimistic.Tech alone will not stop established behaviours, practices and so on that underpin our massive issue. Huge government involvement is required to subsidise and disseminate the tech at the and legislate to curb harmful action at the pace required. They've yet to show any appetitie for doing that.
I'm just hoping things don't get too apocalyptic before I die.
I’m struggling to think of one where there isn’t a load of activity and research into tech designed to mitigate human aresholery
*driving, especially solo, for non-essential reasons (public transit increases would need large taxpayer input and shifting attitudes toward timing of it... don't think we'll ever give up our cars until fuel is ridiculously expensive)
*single use plastic, and the willy nilly attitude to sorting what we dispose ('contamination' sending recycling to landfill)
*food production and waste (we import so much here and I can't see us ever adapting our diets to 'local' during winter/spring, but even if we had more greenhouses, costs will rise to satisfy people's wage needs... our local farms already rely on immigrant labour from Mexico and the Caribbean as Canadians can't/won't work at the rates farmers pay to get by), not to mention how much gets binned because markets HAVE (our want more than theirs) to have entire racks fully stocked with fruit/veg, meat fridges stocked and looking perfect (I buy from the 'eat it today' shelf/section in the freezer all the time, but can only imagine how much ends up binned)
I'd LOVE for us to shift attitudes and practices, and think I'd be prepared to make a lot of changes personally, but don't think governments proposing big changes will get the support they'd need from the masses until we're staring crisis directly in the face / the majority of people are impacted directly by climate change. (Hence my thought above ... though probably more accurately, the generations that follow us could be 'fudged' because of attitudes now)
Really? I hadn’t realized it was that extreme. Do you have some link or something, not that I’m doubting you? I haven’t read seriously on this, but don’t Canadians consume more? Not that I blame them, living so far north.
- Paddington Bear
- Posts: 5961
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:29 pm
- Location: Hertfordshire
Shows as much as anything that efforts to make cars and planes greener, whilst admirable, miss the point.Biffer wrote: ↑Sat Dec 12, 2020 11:25 am All of the restrictions, all the reduction in travel, the decrease of industrial activity, and that reduced global emissions by a mere 7%.
Shows me that we need more than just changes in behaviour, we need fundamental changes to society and the infrastructures of our economies.
Old men forget: yet all shall be forgot, But he'll remember with advantages, What feats he did that day
Agriculture contributes about a third of human greenhouse gas emissions. A substantial amount of that is land use change and that land being put to growing crops for animal feed. Producing a kilo of beef produces 25-30 times the amount of greenhouse gas than producing a kilo of wheat.Niegs wrote: ↑Sun Dec 13, 2020 2:12 pmI don't know the impacts of each of these things versus some of the massive producers like factories, but can't see individual attitudes shifting on (including my own, if I'm honest, though I have a smaller carbon footprint than most where I live, I think) ...
*driving, especially solo, for non-essential reasons (public transit increases would need large taxpayer input and shifting attitudes toward timing of it... don't think we'll ever give up our cars until fuel is ridiculously expensive)
*single use plastic, and the willy nilly attitude to sorting what we dispose ('contamination' sending recycling to landfill)
*food production and waste (we import so much here and I can't see us ever adapting our diets to 'local' during winter/spring, but even if we had more greenhouses, costs will rise to satisfy people's wage needs... our local farms already rely on immigrant labour from Mexico and the Caribbean as Canadians can't/won't work at the rates farmers pay to get by), not to mention how much gets binned because markets HAVE (our want more than theirs) to have entire racks fully stocked with fruit/veg, meat fridges stocked and looking perfect (I buy from the 'eat it today' shelf/section in the freezer all the time, but can only imagine how much ends up binned)
I'd LOVE for us to shift attitudes and practices, and think I'd be prepared to make a lot of changes personally, but don't think governments proposing big changes will get the support they'd need from the masses until we're staring crisis directly in the face / the majority of people are impacted directly by climate change. (Hence my thought above ... though probably more accurately, the generations that follow us could be 'fudged' because of attitudes now)
I’m not advocating going completely vegan, but I’m trying to work my way towards the EAT-Lancet diet. The most significant part of it is probably replacing a lot of your protein with nuts and legumes. But it still lines up something a kilo of chicken, half a kilo of red meat and just under a kilo of fish each month per adult. So depending on what you do with it, that is about two portions of chicken, one portion red meat and one or two portions of fish each week, unless you’re a fat bastard size portion every day kind of person. Which I have been in the past.
https://eatforum.org/eat-lancet-commiss ... t-and-you/
https://eatforum.org/content/uploads/20 ... Report.pdf
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
Interesting. I might already be there, or close to it. I tend to only eat meat at dinner and some days skip... prefer chicken and pork to beef, love fish but am so far inland it’s never fresh or not cheap.Biffer wrote: ↑Sun Dec 13, 2020 5:55 pm
Agriculture contributes about a third of human greenhouse gas emissions. A substantial amount of that is land use change and that land being put to growing crops for animal feed. Producing a kilo of beef produces 25-30 times the amount of greenhouse gas than producing a kilo of wheat.
I’m not advocating going completely vegan, but I’m trying to work my way towards the EAT-Lancet diet. The most significant part of it is probably replacing a lot of your protein with nuts and legumes. But it still lines up something a kilo of chicken, half a kilo of red meat and just under a kilo of fish each month per adult. So depending on what you do with it, that is about two portions of chicken, one portion red meat and one or two portions of fish each week, unless you’re a fat bastard size portion every day kind of person. Which I have been in the past.
https://eatforum.org/eat-lancet-commiss ... t-and-you/
https://eatforum.org/content/uploads/20 ... Report.pdf
I keep hearing non-meat alternatives are good, getting better. Maybe I should start a grub worm farm like in Blade Runner 2049 to get ready?
The point about land use to feed livestock sticks though. I live on an old horse farm that’s surrounded by crop farms... every single one for kms around and the vast majority in the entire region grow corn or soy for animal feed. Maybe we wouldn’t have to eat like pre-war Canadians (lots of root veg and preserves) with modern technology and better land use?
Animal protein.
Edit - I should be clearer on this. There are allowances for dairy and eggs which are also in the animal protein category. If your question is relating to thinks like crocodile, ostrich etc as meats, it’s not really viable to include them in an allowance against 9 billion people. They will have a greenhouse gas impact, I’m not sure what it will be but often smaller suppliers are higher in terms of gas per kilo. If you’re talking about lab grown meat, that’s a whole different ball game.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
There are probably some meats that come at less impact, but pretty much all of them are limited in the amount that can be harvested sustainably. For example venison from Highland Deer here in Scotland is an option, but because this is harvesting wild deer rather than farming, there’s a limit on how much can be produced each year. If you change to a farming model for such animals, if it’s possible, then you will have another calculation about production greenhouse gasses. Same applies to Kangaroos in Australia for example.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
Yeah, I can deal with two portions of chicken and two of fish each week and veggie after that, but I need the occasional fried breakfast and roast.
One of the things I'm not sure about in that diet is where you'd count things like Black pudding.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
-
- Posts: 3585
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 9:37 am
- Torquemada 1420
- Posts: 11156
- Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:22 am
- Location: Hut 8
Australia burned. France burned. The US is burning. Turkey is burning. Greece is burning.
But there is no global warming [/ Fat Albert]
But there is no global warming [/ Fat Albert]
Add Sweden and Finland + a lot of siberia (ghost fires seem to be great fun).Torquemada 1420 wrote: ↑Mon Aug 09, 2021 9:59 am Australia burned. France burned. The US is burning. Turkey is burning. Greece is burning.
But there is no global warming [/ Fat Albert]
- Torquemada 1420
- Posts: 11156
- Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:22 am
- Location: Hut 8
And we are worried about COVID FFSlaurent wrote: ↑Mon Aug 09, 2021 11:51 amAdd Sweden and Finland + a lot of siberia (ghost fires seem to be great fun).Torquemada 1420 wrote: ↑Mon Aug 09, 2021 9:59 am Australia burned. France burned. The US is burning. Turkey is burning. Greece is burning.
But there is no global warming [/ Fat Albert]
Well it does fill hospitals to the point that they can't treat other people.Torquemada 1420 wrote: ↑Mon Aug 09, 2021 1:17 pmAnd we are worried about COVID FFSlaurent wrote: ↑Mon Aug 09, 2021 11:51 amAdd Sweden and Finland + a lot of siberia (ghost fires seem to be great fun).Torquemada 1420 wrote: ↑Mon Aug 09, 2021 9:59 am Australia burned. France burned. The US is burning. Turkey is burning. Greece is burning.
But there is no global warming [/ Fat Albert]
Indeed, look at the rate of growth of Chinese emissions in the last 50 years; from nowhere to the biggest polluter in no time at all.
The main problem is that the vast majority of people just don’t give a shit, even well educated wealthy people who have no excuses.
As a example that does my head in I walked down my street tonight and counted 5 cars in a row parked up with their engines on talking away on their phones. I know it’s a tiny thing in the scheme of things, but it drives me nuts.
As a example that does my head in I walked down my street tonight and counted 5 cars in a row parked up with their engines on talking away on their phones. I know it’s a tiny thing in the scheme of things, but it drives me nuts.
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
Are you sure it wasn’t a cab rank?Slick wrote: ↑Mon Aug 09, 2021 9:06 pm The main problem is that the vast majority of people just don’t give a shit, even well educated wealthy people who have no excuses.
As a example that does my head in I walked down my street tonight and counted 5 cars in a row parked up with their engines on talking away on their phones. I know it’s a tiny thing in the scheme of things, but it drives me nuts.
-
- Posts: 8665
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 11:48 am
Some will claim they do, but in reality it's clearly not enough of a shit for them to change their lives in any way that might be even a minor inconvenience.Slick wrote: ↑Mon Aug 09, 2021 9:06 pm The main problem is that the vast majority of people just don’t give a shit, even well educated wealthy people who have no excuses.
As a example that does my head in I walked down my street tonight and counted 5 cars in a row parked up with their engines on talking away on their phones. I know it’s a tiny thing in the scheme of things, but it drives me nuts.
The UK is small fry in the scheme of things. Until China, India, USA, Russia can change and develop and environmental conscience we are all fucked. It doesn’t matter if we have zero output.Slick wrote: ↑Mon Aug 09, 2021 9:06 pm The main problem is that the vast majority of people just don’t give a shit, even well educated wealthy people who have no excuses.
As a example that does my head in I walked down my street tonight and counted 5 cars in a row parked up with their engines on talking away on their phones. I know it’s a tiny thing in the scheme of things, but it drives me nuts.
I’m not saying we should give up and do nothing our end fwiw.
Yup, driving the kids 1/2 mile to school, coming out of Costco with hundreds of bottles of water (in fucking Scotland!) etc etc, it’s maddening.sockwithaticket wrote: ↑Mon Aug 09, 2021 9:52 pmSome will claim they do, but in reality it's clearly not enough of a shit for them to change their lives in any way that might be even a minor inconvenience.Slick wrote: ↑Mon Aug 09, 2021 9:06 pm The main problem is that the vast majority of people just don’t give a shit, even well educated wealthy people who have no excuses.
As a example that does my head in I walked down my street tonight and counted 5 cars in a row parked up with their engines on talking away on their phones. I know it’s a tiny thing in the scheme of things, but it drives me nuts.
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
Of course, but even small things we know are doing harm make the local environment a better place to liveYmx wrote: ↑Tue Aug 10, 2021 6:06 amThe UK is small fry in the scheme of things. Until China, India, USA, Russia can change and develop and environmental conscience we are all fucked. It doesn’t matter if we have zero output.Slick wrote: ↑Mon Aug 09, 2021 9:06 pm The main problem is that the vast majority of people just don’t give a shit, even well educated wealthy people who have no excuses.
As a example that does my head in I walked down my street tonight and counted 5 cars in a row parked up with their engines on talking away on their phones. I know it’s a tiny thing in the scheme of things, but it drives me nuts.
I’m not saying we should give up and do nothing our end fwiw.
All the money you made will never buy back your soul