Chauvin/Floyd trial

Where goats go to escape
User avatar
Saint
Posts: 2274
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 8:38 am

Jury have reached a verdict after less than a day's deliberation. Due to be read out inside the hour
User avatar
Ymx
Posts: 8557
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:03 pm

Assume the case is pretty strong against him

3 charges weren’t there.

2 of degrees of murder. And 1 of manslaughter.
User avatar
Ymx
Posts: 8557
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:03 pm

Chauvin is charged with second-degree unintentional murder, third-degree murder and second-degree manslaughter.
User avatar
Saint
Posts: 2274
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 8:38 am

10 hours to consider all 3 charges independently (he can be found guilty of any of them in any combination). Suggests they've see this as fairly clear cut.
User avatar
Raggs
Posts: 3698
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 6:51 pm

Saint wrote: Tue Apr 20, 2021 8:39 pm 10 hours to consider all 3 charges independently (he can be found guilty of any of them in any combination). Suggests they've see this as fairly clear cut.
Even though it was quick, I still wouldn't want to guess as to what exactly they've decided...
Give a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.
User avatar
ScarfaceClaw
Posts: 2623
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:11 pm

Raggs wrote: Tue Apr 20, 2021 8:43 pm
Saint wrote: Tue Apr 20, 2021 8:39 pm 10 hours to consider all 3 charges independently (he can be found guilty of any of them in any combination). Suggests they've see this as fairly clear cut.
Even though it was quick, I still wouldn't want to guess as to what exactly they've decided...
He’s as guilty as a puppy next to a pile of poo. Although just for the craic and the total and utter meltdown that would happen, a not guilty verdict would liven the day up.
Slick
Posts: 11913
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:58 pm

Saint wrote: Tue Apr 20, 2021 8:39 pm 10 hours to consider all 3 charges independently (he can be found guilty of any of them in any combination). Suggests they've see this as fairly clear cut.
It was never, ever going to be anything but a guilty verdict
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
User avatar
Ymx
Posts: 8557
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:03 pm

I think it’s to which charge(s).

If it’s just the man slaughter then there will be outrage.
User avatar
Saint
Posts: 2274
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 8:38 am

Raggs wrote: Tue Apr 20, 2021 8:43 pm
Saint wrote: Tue Apr 20, 2021 8:39 pm 10 hours to consider all 3 charges independently (he can be found guilty of any of them in any combination). Suggests they've see this as fairly clear cut.
Even though it was quick, I still wouldn't want to guess as to what exactly they've decided...
Me either. I think it's as likely they've said not guilty on all three charges as guilty
User avatar
ScarfaceClaw
Posts: 2623
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:11 pm

Saint wrote: Tue Apr 20, 2021 8:49 pm
Raggs wrote: Tue Apr 20, 2021 8:43 pm
Saint wrote: Tue Apr 20, 2021 8:39 pm 10 hours to consider all 3 charges independently (he can be found guilty of any of them in any combination). Suggests they've see this as fairly clear cut.
Even though it was quick, I still wouldn't want to guess as to what exactly they've decided...
Me either. I think it's as likely they've said not guilty on all three charges as guilty
I couldn’t see on what basis they could consider a not guilty verdict to be honest. It was blatant and there’s no obvious justifiable circumstances where that length of kneeling would have been warranted.
User avatar
BnM
Posts: 977
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2020 2:40 pm

Depends on the law. This is the country of open carry etc etc.
User avatar
Saint
Posts: 2274
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 8:38 am

ScarfaceClaw wrote: Tue Apr 20, 2021 8:52 pm
Saint wrote: Tue Apr 20, 2021 8:49 pm
Raggs wrote: Tue Apr 20, 2021 8:43 pm

Even though it was quick, I still wouldn't want to guess as to what exactly they've decided...
Me either. I think it's as likely they've said not guilty on all three charges as guilty
I couldn’t see on what basis they could consider a not guilty verdict to be honest. It was blatant and there’s no obvious justifiable circumstances where that length of kneeling would have been warranted.
There's been a lot of cops get off in the US where we would see them as slam dunk guilty.
User avatar
Ymx
Posts: 8557
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:03 pm

Anyone else feel a bit morbid waiting for this
User avatar
Saint
Posts: 2274
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 8:38 am

Ymx wrote: Tue Apr 20, 2021 8:56 pm Anyone else feel a bit morbid waiting for this
Yep. It's a wierd thing
User avatar
Ymx
Posts: 8557
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:03 pm

Saint wrote: Tue Apr 20, 2021 8:55 pm
ScarfaceClaw wrote: Tue Apr 20, 2021 8:52 pm
Saint wrote: Tue Apr 20, 2021 8:49 pm

Me either. I think it's as likely they've said not guilty on all three charges as guilty
I couldn’t see on what basis they could consider a not guilty verdict to be honest. It was blatant and there’s no obvious justifiable circumstances where that length of kneeling would have been warranted.
There's been a lot of cops get off in the US where we would see them as slam dunk guilty.
Assume the court can’t ignore other precedent cases despite everyone baying for max charge
User avatar
Saint
Posts: 2274
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 8:38 am

Ymx wrote: Tue Apr 20, 2021 8:58 pm
Saint wrote: Tue Apr 20, 2021 8:55 pm
ScarfaceClaw wrote: Tue Apr 20, 2021 8:52 pm

I couldn’t see on what basis they could consider a not guilty verdict to be honest. It was blatant and there’s no obvious justifiable circumstances where that length of kneeling would have been warranted.
There's been a lot of cops get off in the US where we would see them as slam dunk guilty.
Assume the court can’t ignore other precedent cases despite everyone baying for max charge
The jury have more or less complete independence in terms of whether they feel the case is proven.

If precedent was an issue the judge would have already thrown out the charges
User avatar
Paddington Bear
Posts: 5961
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:29 pm
Location: Hertfordshire

No way he’s anything but guilty. That video was a horrendous watch. 9 minutes of choking someone’s life out, thin blue line trigger finger in anger defence isn’t going to cut it here
Old men forget: yet all shall be forgot, But he'll remember with advantages, What feats he did that day
User avatar
Ymx
Posts: 8557
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:03 pm

Paddington Bear wrote: Tue Apr 20, 2021 9:00 pm No way he’s anything but guilty. That video was a horrendous watch. 9 minutes of choking someone’s life out, thin blue line trigger finger in anger defence isn’t going to cut it here
Of which charges? All/the worst of them?
Last edited by Ymx on Tue Apr 20, 2021 9:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Paddington Bear
Posts: 5961
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:29 pm
Location: Hertfordshire

Ymx wrote: Tue Apr 20, 2021 9:01 pm
Paddington Bear wrote: Tue Apr 20, 2021 9:00 pm No way he’s anything but guilty. That video was a horrendous watch. 9 minutes of choking someone’s life out, thin blue line trigger finger in anger defence isn’t going to cut it here
Of which charges? All of them?
He’s a murderer, no doubt in my mind about that
Old men forget: yet all shall be forgot, But he'll remember with advantages, What feats he did that day
User avatar
Ymx
Posts: 8557
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:03 pm

Guilty of all 3
User avatar
Ymx
Posts: 8557
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:03 pm

Where is this guy going to jail?
User avatar
Ymx
Posts: 8557
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:03 pm

Sentencing in 8 weeks
User avatar
Saint
Posts: 2274
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 8:38 am

The appeal is going in already
User avatar
Enzedder
Posts: 3577
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 6:55 pm
Location: Hamilton NZ

Excellent decision. Like that congresswoman, I don't believe any other verdict was reasonable
I drink and I forget things.
User avatar
Mr Bungle
Posts: 744
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 6:14 pm

ScarfaceClaw wrote: Tue Apr 20, 2021 8:46 pm
Raggs wrote: Tue Apr 20, 2021 8:43 pm
Saint wrote: Tue Apr 20, 2021 8:39 pm 10 hours to consider all 3 charges independently (he can be found guilty of any of them in any combination). Suggests they've see this as fairly clear cut.
Even though it was quick, I still wouldn't want to guess as to what exactly they've decided...
He’s as guilty as a puppy next to a pile of poo. Although just for the craic and the total and utter meltdown that would happen, a not guilty verdict would liven the day up.
Yeah, that would have been great craic :???:
User avatar
fishfoodie
Posts: 8221
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm

Ymx wrote: Tue Apr 20, 2021 9:08 pm Where is this guy going to jail?
It doesn't really matter.

I imagine because he's a cop, they'll put him in a Federal supermax; & he'll spend 23 hours a day in his 6x8 ft box & then he'll have 1 glorious hour of exercise .... alone

He'll rot there for decades; while his appeals go no where.
User avatar
Uncle fester
Posts: 4192
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 9:42 pm

Slick wrote: Tue Apr 20, 2021 8:47 pm
Saint wrote: Tue Apr 20, 2021 8:39 pm 10 hours to consider all 3 charges independently (he can be found guilty of any of them in any combination). Suggests they've see this as fairly clear cut.
It was never, ever going to be anything but a guilty verdict
Been some odd verdicts in the US over the years.
User avatar
Sandstorm
Posts: 10884
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:05 pm
Location: England

fishfoodie wrote: Tue Apr 20, 2021 10:09 pm
Ymx wrote: Tue Apr 20, 2021 9:08 pm Where is this guy going to jail?
It doesn't really matter.

I imagine because he's a cop, they'll put him in a Federal supermax; & he'll spend 23 hours a day in his 6x8 ft box & then he'll have 1 glorious hour of exercise .... alone

He'll rot there for decades; while his appeals go no where.
He didn’t commit a federal crime. He’ll go into protective custody in a regular prison. Medium security probably.
robmatic
Posts: 2094
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 7:46 am

Paddington Bear wrote: Tue Apr 20, 2021 9:00 pm No way he’s anything but guilty. That video was a horrendous watch. 9 minutes of choking someone’s life out, thin blue line trigger finger in anger defence isn’t going to cut it here
He's a cop though, they usually get away with (literal) murder so it is somewhat of a surprise.

Just think though, even with all the witnesses, there wouldn't have been a trial or even any sort of disciplinary procedure without the video.
User avatar
Paddington Bear
Posts: 5961
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:29 pm
Location: Hertfordshire

robmatic wrote: Wed Apr 21, 2021 7:15 am
Paddington Bear wrote: Tue Apr 20, 2021 9:00 pm No way he’s anything but guilty. That video was a horrendous watch. 9 minutes of choking someone’s life out, thin blue line trigger finger in anger defence isn’t going to cut it here
He's a cop though, they usually get away with (literal) murder so it is somewhat of a surprise.

Just think though, even with all the witnesses, there wouldn't have been a trial or even any sort of disciplinary procedure without the video.
It is a unique case in some ways though. A split second before firing a gun and blowing someone's head off is much more easily explained away than choking someone out for 9 minutes. Plenty of people want to support the police, and will take the opportunity to if you can reasonably give a 'you weren't there, you don't know the stress' style defence.
Old men forget: yet all shall be forgot, But he'll remember with advantages, What feats he did that day
robmatic
Posts: 2094
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 7:46 am

Paddington Bear wrote: Wed Apr 21, 2021 7:30 am
robmatic wrote: Wed Apr 21, 2021 7:15 am
Paddington Bear wrote: Tue Apr 20, 2021 9:00 pm No way he’s anything but guilty. That video was a horrendous watch. 9 minutes of choking someone’s life out, thin blue line trigger finger in anger defence isn’t going to cut it here
He's a cop though, they usually get away with (literal) murder so it is somewhat of a surprise.

Just think though, even with all the witnesses, there wouldn't have been a trial or even any sort of disciplinary procedure without the video.
It is a unique case in some ways though. A split second before firing a gun and blowing someone's head off is much more easily explained away than choking someone out for 9 minutes. Plenty of people want to support the police, and will take the opportunity to if you can reasonably give a 'you weren't there, you don't know the stress' style defence.
Minneapolis Police initially reported this as "Man Dies After Medical Incident During Police Interaction".
User avatar
Insane_Homer
Posts: 5389
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:14 pm
Location: Leafy Surrey

Image
“Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true.”
Slick
Posts: 11913
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:58 pm

Uncle fester wrote: Wed Apr 21, 2021 7:09 am
Slick wrote: Tue Apr 20, 2021 8:47 pm
Saint wrote: Tue Apr 20, 2021 8:39 pm 10 hours to consider all 3 charges independently (he can be found guilty of any of them in any combination). Suggests they've see this as fairly clear cut.
It was never, ever going to be anything but a guilty verdict
Been some odd verdicts in the US over the years.
Yes, which made this one even more likely to be guilty
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
Slick
Posts: 11913
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:58 pm

robmatic wrote: Wed Apr 21, 2021 7:15 am
Paddington Bear wrote: Tue Apr 20, 2021 9:00 pm No way he’s anything but guilty. That video was a horrendous watch. 9 minutes of choking someone’s life out, thin blue line trigger finger in anger defence isn’t going to cut it here
He's a cop though, they usually get away with (literal) murder so it is somewhat of a surprise.

Just think though, even with all the witnesses, there wouldn't have been a trial or even any sort of disciplinary procedure without the video.
Didn't the district prosecutor originally decide there wasn't a case to prosecute?
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
User avatar
Saint
Posts: 2274
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 8:38 am

Ignoring appeals, he'll only be sentenced for the most serious of the crimes, and state guidelines for sentencing mean he should get the low end of the tariff. so he gets 12.5 years, and will serve less than half of that with parole
User avatar
ASMO
Posts: 5423
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 6:08 pm

Saint wrote: Wed Apr 21, 2021 8:07 am Ignoring appeals, he'll only be sentenced for the most serious of the crimes, and state guidelines for sentencing mean he should get the low end of the tariff. so he gets 12.5 years, and will serve less than half of that with parole
Unlikely as whilst that is the minimum tariff, the judge will consider other aggravating factors like the fact there was a child witnessing this, the position of power the cop had which was abused and a few other things, i tihnk he will get closer to 20 years.
User avatar
Torquemada 1420
Posts: 11155
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:22 am
Location: Hut 8

robmatic wrote: Wed Apr 21, 2021 7:15 am
Paddington Bear wrote: Tue Apr 20, 2021 9:00 pm No way he’s anything but guilty. That video was a horrendous watch. 9 minutes of choking someone’s life out, thin blue line trigger finger in anger defence isn’t going to cut it here
He's a cop though, they usually get away with (literal) murder so it is somewhat of a surprise.

Just think though, even with all the witnesses, there wouldn't have been a trial or even any sort of disciplinary procedure without the video.
He chose the wrong time to play his "get out of jail free card". An accumulation of offences meant someone was taking a team card in order to appease the public. He is guilty as f**k but don't think the right verdict was reached as a consequence of justice. This was political.

Expect normal service to resume.
Lemoentjie
Posts: 642
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 10:11 am

The statements from American politicians prior to his sentencing were very worrying. Serious grounds for a mistrial. If only people in 2021 could keep their mouths shut instead of thinking the whole world wants to know their point of view. Stick to protocol.
Big D
Posts: 3927
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2020 11:55 am

Pleasantly surprised there wasn't one dissenting juror.
User avatar
C69
Posts: 3336
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:42 pm

Post Reply