The Military Pictures Thread

Where goats go to escape
User avatar
fishfoodie
Posts: 8581
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm

tc27 wrote: Sun May 16, 2021 6:39 am
Torquemada 1420 wrote: Wed Apr 28, 2021 10:10 am
fishfoodie wrote: Tue Apr 27, 2021 7:36 pm

Every time I hear about how the fly boys were dead set on getting the A-10 cancelled, I get angrier & angrier.

There are probably thousands of soldiers & marines alive today because of the A-10; & the idea the F35, or any other fucking fighter, is going to come remotely close to useful, as a Close-Air-Support platform; is so cretinous, as to be frankly insulting, to this generation of soldiers & marines.

All an F35 will do in CAS, is kill friendlies.
Agree. One of the most f**kwitted decisions in a long history of f**kwitted military decisions. A quite extraordinary weapons platform.
The A10 is toast against any modern adversary though. Roughly handled by the better equipped Iraq formations in DS.

F35 with standoff/loiter munitions actually stands a chance in a peer war.
Or...

You could do what everyone wanted at the start; an air supremacy fighter, AND, a specialist CAS aircraft.

By the airforce couldn't control the budget on their choice; so they threw the CAS role aside, & claimed that by accessorizing the F35, it would be just as good as the A-10.
tc27
Posts: 2557
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:18 pm

Flying the classic CAS profile against a peer enemy is suicide - it pretty was much in the Cold war where the a10s lifespan would have being hours. CAS aircraft are increasing just going to be launch platforms for sophisticated stand off munitions - as such the F35 with its stealth and superb sensors is well placed.


If your gonna keep doing missions like Afgan you could develop a relatively unsophisticated prop driven CAS platform for your COIN operations (thinking a modern A6 Skyraider or Pucara)
tc27
Posts: 2557
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:18 pm

Any back on subject - these long exposure Iron Dome pictures are pretty incredible:

Image
tc27
Posts: 2557
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:18 pm

Naval exercise off the coast of Scotland.

Image

Got a mate on HMS Queen Lizzie - will be gone for months.
User avatar
Niegs
Posts: 3598
Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2020 3:20 pm

I believe a mate of mine is on the boarding party about to confiscate a bunch of dodgy stuff from this boat off the coast of Oman.

Image

We seem to keep ours a lot cleaner than the Yanks!

Image
User avatar
mat the expat
Posts: 1508
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 11:12 pm

The Americans are suffering from their surge over the last few years.

No time to repaint
User avatar
laurent
Posts: 2253
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 6:36 am

mat the expat wrote: Tue May 18, 2021 5:21 am The Americans are suffering from their surge over the last few years.

No time to repaint
Good old "peinture sur merde égal propreté "
:lol:
User avatar
Paddington Bear
Posts: 6508
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:29 pm
Location: Hertfordshire

Niegs wrote: Tue May 18, 2021 2:04 am I believe a mate of mine is on the boarding party about to confiscate a bunch of dodgy stuff from this boat off the coast of Oman.

Image

We seem to keep ours a lot cleaner than the Yanks!

Image
Something I noticed when I lived in Southampton - if I had nothing else on and a big ship was coming in to Portsmouth I'd take the train over. The American ones often looked a state.
Old men forget: yet all shall be forgot, But he'll remember with advantages, What feats he did that day
tc27
Posts: 2557
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:18 pm

Talking of dirty ships I walked past HMS Belfast yesterday and her paintwork is not in a good condition.

Seeing as we kept no other capital ships from that era* I wonder if long term she needs to be drydocked and sheltered somewhere - last time I went on lots of the top work was not in a good state either.


*Am still surprised about how completely unsentimental the Navy and public were in the late 40s/50s about saving any of the ships that fought in WW2 - saving something like HMS Warspite would have being an incredible bit of naval history (though in pretty much every WW2 theatre and Jutland) but instead left as a wreck when she slipped her towing line and left to rot/be used a a bombing target.

Image
User avatar
Paddington Bear
Posts: 6508
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:29 pm
Location: Hertfordshire

The Attlee government basically decided we didn't need a Navy anymore, no? Was always my understanding that the post-war focus was on bombers, conscription and the nuclear weapons project. Crying shame.

AIUI thousands turned up to pay their respects to Warspite once it ran aground. Nice to see one of the new subs is taking on the name.
Old men forget: yet all shall be forgot, But he'll remember with advantages, What feats he did that day
User avatar
Niegs
Posts: 3598
Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2020 3:20 pm

tc27 wrote: Tue May 18, 2021 8:19 am Talking of dirty ships I walked past HMS Belfast yesterday and her paintwork is not in a good condition.

Seeing as we kept no other capital ships from that era* I wonder if long term she needs to be drydocked and sheltered somewhere - last time I went on lots of the top work was not in a good state either.


*Am still surprised about how completely unsentimental the Navy and public were in the late 40s/50s about saving any of the ships that fought in WW2 - saving something like HMS Warspite would have being an incredible bit of naval history (though in pretty much every WW2 theatre and Jutland) but instead left as a wreck when she slipped her towing line and left to rot/be used a a bombing target.

Image
That came up in a recent fb post from a history group I follow showing the Uboats surrendered to the Royal Canadian Navy. Someone asked why we didn't even keep one as the standard would have been good for a while, or at least for training, and they were pretty sure we didn't have any (oddly enough, we had two in WW1 but I think sailors just hitched rides on RN subs in WW2).

The museum I used to work for had some images from the surrender of U889, I recall that we didn't keep it long or even sunk it in a live fire exercise (edit: maybe that was another one)
U-889 was ordered to head to Bay Bulls, Newfoundland. 24 hours later U-889 was turned over to the frigates HMCS Buckingham and HMCS Inch Arran who escorted her to Shelburne Harbour where she was boarded and Braeucker, her commanding officer, made a formal surrender.

On 14 May 1945, U-889 was commissioned into the RCN and decommissioned in December 1945.

U-889 was one of ten U-boats allocated to the United States as part of the Tripartite Naval Commission sitting in Berlin in November 1945. She sailed to Portsmouth, New Hampshire on 11 January 1946 and experiments were conducted on her special hydrophone gear. She was scuttled at the end of 1947.
Ahh, it was U190!
U-190 was formally commissioned into the Royal Canadian Navy on 19 May. Her first assignment, in the summer of 1945, was a ceremonial tour of communities along the St. Lawrence River and Gulf of St. Lawrence, with stops in Montreal, Trois-Rivières, Quebec City, Gaspé, Pictou, and Sydney. On returning to Halifax she assumed duties as an anti-submarine training vessel, which she continued to fulfill for a year and a half.
Operation Scuttled

U-190 was paid off on 24 July 1947, but had one last mission to complete.

The official purpose of "Operation Scuttled" was to provide training for inexperienced post-war recruits in the art of combined operations. U-190, painted in lurid red and yellow stripes, was towed to the spot where she had sunk Esquimalt, and at precisely 11:00 hours on Trafalgar Day 1947, the fireworks began. The "exercise" called for a deliberately escalating firepower demonstration, beginning with airborne rockets and culminating in a destroyer bombardment with 4.7-inch guns and a hedgehog anti-submarine weapon providing the coup de grace.

While numerous reporters and photographers watched, and HMCS New Liskeard, Nootka, and Haida stood by awaiting their turn, the Naval Air Arm began the attack with eight Seafires, eight Fairey Fireflies, two Avro Ansons, and two Fairey Swordfish.

The first rocket attack struck home, and almost before the destroyers had a chance to train their guns, the U-boat was on the bottom of the ocean less than twenty minutes after the commencement of "Operation Scuttled."
Image


I wonder if no one thought about keeping such a thing as a display / museum / memorial piece at all and both saw them as a pain to have around, clogging up space, and worth some money in scrap? I've never thought to ask my museum colleagues if making vehicles into memorials / living history museums is something that didn't come until the 60s or so (when I know North America rebuilt things like forts and refurbished old buildings into public spaces).
tc27
Posts: 2557
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:18 pm

Slick
Posts: 12879
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:58 pm

tc27 wrote: Sun May 16, 2021 8:49 pm Any back on subject - these long exposure Iron Dome pictures are pretty incredible:

Image
How effective do we think the Iron Dome is? I'm sure the Israelis big it up a bit but it seems pretty incredible
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
inactionman
Posts: 3398
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 7:37 am

Slick wrote: Thu May 20, 2021 1:04 pm
tc27 wrote: Sun May 16, 2021 8:49 pm Any back on subject - these long exposure Iron Dome pictures are pretty incredible:

Image
How effective do we think the Iron Dome is? I'm sure the Israelis big it up a bit but it seems pretty incredible
It's supposed to be around 90-95% successful*, so of the quoted 800ish rockets fired in the latest round of horribleness about 50-80 will have got through. Bear in mind these are in pretty much all cases pretty noddy home-made rockets with fuel made with fertilizer and sugar and you'd hope these would be relatively easy to deal with as the attacking rockets don't go very high or fast and are pretty much line of sight (although response times of course need to be quick as they aren't up for very long). Hamas are, I believe, trying to for saturation, just lumping so many rockets up that the Iron Dome launchers haven't capacity (or the radar loses ability to track simultaneously). I think they haven't reached it yet, no idea what that upper capacity figure is.

*I'd have more faith in this number than for the initial reports for Patriot in the Gulf wars - the US originally stated effectiveness of 96% and subsequently dropped it to around 60%, but these numbers are still challenged as too high - as the rockets are much, much cruder than scuds and the technology has of course moved on a fair bit. And it's all filmed.
inactionman
Posts: 3398
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 7:37 am

On a similar topic, Rayheon developed a system for armoured vehicle defence that's pretty amazing in terms of its response time:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OAaw3S5 ... McLionhead
tc27
Posts: 2557
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:18 pm

Interception rates are up in the higher 90s according to reports - the issue with Iron Dome is sustained attacks by very basic rockets require an interceptor missile that is estimated to cost c25-30k.

So its prohibitively expensive for the Israeli (US) taxpayer and a sustained attack could run down the inventory of missiles.
Jock42
Posts: 2585
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:01 pm

How does it stack up against the phalanx? Much better I assume?

Cool phot BTW, was trying to find a video of few phalanx going off at once but came up short.

EDIT: Found it. Didn't realise it was part of iron dome, I thought iron dome was a specific weapon rather than an integrated system.

tc27
Posts: 2557
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:18 pm

Phalanx is a line of sight 'last ditch weapon' whereas Iron Dome can protect a much wider area and engage multiple targets at once.
inactionman
Posts: 3398
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 7:37 am

Jock42 wrote: Thu May 20, 2021 1:43 pm How does it stack up against the phalanx? Much better I assume?

Cool phot BTW, was trying to find a video of few phalanx going off at once but came up short.

EDIT: Found it. Didn't realise it was part of iron dome, I thought iron dome was a specific weapon rather than an integrated system.

The gun-based systems are designed around being last lines of resort and fitted near or on the expected targets - as tc27 says ranges and coverages are an issue as they obviously need to be in line of sight and in-range. I've also no real idea how they perform in deflection, firing at something that isn't heading in some way towards them, they already perform quite a few predictive calculations so expect them to be able to handle it. They can handle multipipe targets, with ability to triage ad prioritise the most imminent threats, but obviously there's a maximum number they can physically aim at and fire upon within a given time frame.

Another issue is that systems like Phalanx/Goalkeeper will kick out a shit-ton of 30mm (edit - 20mm) depleted uranium which will land somewhere relatively nearby (the maritime versions are DU as they need to properly maul high energy, heavy missiles at short range which justifies the high density DU- I assume land based might use HE which can be set to detonate by fuse). Guided missiles can be detonated or - in event of misses or inability to locate targets - to perform some other measure to make sure it doesn't end up where you didn't want it.
tc27
Posts: 2557
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:18 pm

inactionman wrote: Thu May 20, 2021 1:21 pm On a similar topic, Rayheon developed a system for armoured vehicle defence that's pretty amazing in terms of its response time:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OAaw3S5 ... McLionhead
Active Projection Systems look like they will swing the advantage back to tanks against ATGMs..suspect they will be standard in all first tier militaries before too long.
Jock42
Posts: 2585
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:01 pm

inactionman wrote: Thu May 20, 2021 2:10 pm I've also no real idea how they perform in deflection, firing at something that isn't heading in some way towards them, they already perform quite a few predictive calculations so expect them to be able to handle it. They can handle multipipe targets, with ability to triage ad prioritise the most imminent threats, but obviously there's a maximum number they can physically aim at and fire upon within a given time frame.

I know they weren't very well thought of in Iraq (whether that was based on stats or just anecdotal opinion I'm not sure) at least initially. Presumably because they didn't have enough time for targeting in many situations.
User avatar
fishfoodie
Posts: 8581
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm

inactionman wrote: Thu May 20, 2021 2:10 pm
The gun-based systems are designed around being last lines of resort and fitted near or on the expected targets - as tc27 says ranges and coverages are an issue as they obviously need to be in line of sight and in-range. I've also no real idea how they perform in deflection, firing at something that isn't heading in some way towards them, they already perform quite a few predictive calculations so expect them to be able to handle it. They can handle multipipe targets, with ability to triage ad prioritise the most imminent threats, but obviously there's a maximum number they can physically aim at and fire upon within a given time frame.

Another issue is that systems like Phalanx/Goalkeeper will kick out a shit-ton of 30mm (edit - 20mm) depleted uranium which will land somewhere relatively nearby (the maritime versions are DU as they need to properly maul high energy, heavy missiles at short range which justifies the high density DU- I assume land based might use HE which can be set to detonate by fuse). Guided missiles can be detonated or - in event of misses or inability to locate targets - to perform some other measure to make sure it doesn't end up where you didn't want it.
Not quite the last resort.

I stayed near this school a few years ago; & it had a rather unique construction; with what looks like a short length of elevated motorway about the school building.

Image

It's very close to Gaza, & from what I was told, they rely on the Phalanx; because the rockets are already in their terminal phase, by the time the missiles are warming up; so there's slim to no chance of a missile interception.

I was there for a couple of weeks; & ended up crammed in a hotel stairwell twice, for drills.
User avatar
Niegs
Posts: 3598
Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2020 3:20 pm

Image
inactionman
Posts: 3398
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 7:37 am

fishfoodie wrote: Thu May 20, 2021 8:40 pm
inactionman wrote: Thu May 20, 2021 2:10 pm
The gun-based systems are designed around being last lines of resort and fitted near or on the expected targets - as tc27 says ranges and coverages are an issue as they obviously need to be in line of sight and in-range. I've also no real idea how they perform in deflection, firing at something that isn't heading in some way towards them, they already perform quite a few predictive calculations so expect them to be able to handle it. They can handle multipipe targets, with ability to triage ad prioritise the most imminent threats, but obviously there's a maximum number they can physically aim at and fire upon within a given time frame.

Another issue is that systems like Phalanx/Goalkeeper will kick out a shit-ton of 30mm (edit - 20mm) depleted uranium which will land somewhere relatively nearby (the maritime versions are DU as they need to properly maul high energy, heavy missiles at short range which justifies the high density DU- I assume land based might use HE which can be set to detonate by fuse). Guided missiles can be detonated or - in event of misses or inability to locate targets - to perform some other measure to make sure it doesn't end up where you didn't want it.
Not quite the last resort.

I stayed near this school a few years ago; & it had a rather unique construction; with what looks like a short length of elevated motorway about the school building.

Image

It's very close to Gaza, & from what I was told, they rely on the Phalanx; because the rockets are already in their terminal phase, by the time the missiles are warming up; so there's slim to no chance of a missile interception.

I was there for a couple of weeks; & ended up crammed in a hotel stairwell twice, for drills.
Christ. I can't imagine what it would be like to worry about getting rockets/missiles/shells dropped on my head at a moment's notice. I've wondered who could vote for an arse like Netanyahu, until I acknowledge that many Israelis have faced this for years and I'm not surprised it would start to exhaust human empathy.

On topic of defence systems, it's easy to forget just how close all these protagonists are - I've only had a short working week in Israel for a conference in Haifa (way up on north coast so not directly impacted by the eta:tension - it was peaceful when we were there, but a degree of tension in Tel Aviv and Jerusalem), we had day trip to Jerusalem* and could easily see Bethlehem. I can imagine there wouldn't be much time to react if someone started shooting.



* I'll admit I'm not actually sure what the status of Jerusalem is, is it ostensibly shared (recognising that what it is in theory and in real life might be two sperate things)? I'm pretty naïve on the ways in which things are divvied up after all the various conflicts, and after we made a horlicks of it in 1948.
User avatar
laurent
Posts: 2253
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 6:36 am

Image
User avatar
fishfoodie
Posts: 8581
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm

inactionman wrote: Fri May 21, 2021 9:16 am
Christ. I can't imagine what it would be like to worry about getting rockets/missiles/shells dropped on my head at a moment's notice. I've wondered who could vote for an arse like Netanyahu, until I acknowledge that many Israelis have faced this for years and I'm not surprised it would start to exhaust human empathy.
Israel has a system of PR that makes coalitions inevitable; & that means; if your likud, bringing in people who make the DUP look like sensible, well grounded, individuals. When the Soviet Union collapsed; the politics of Israel took a massive lurch to the right; & Bibi cashed in on it, the prick
On topic of defence systems, it's easy to forget just how close all these protagonists are - I've only had a short working week in Israel for a conference in Haifa (way up on north coast so not directly impacted by the eta:tension - it was peaceful when we were there, but a degree of tension in Tel Aviv and Jerusalem), we had day trip to Jerusalem* and could easily see Bethlehem. I can imagine there wouldn't be much time to react if someone started shooting.
Israel if really, really small; & people don't realize this.

Its about the same size as Ulster; & you've 9+ million in that small space; & that's an area that includes the disputed areas; & that's why the settlements are such a toxic discussion.

You might have had a bit of a small sense of security in Haifa; while they might not be able to get you with rockets from Gaza; it's the main target from Lebanon :wink:

I like Haifa; there's a few great places to eat down in the German colony; & we went for beers down there one shabbat; & had bacon cheese burgers in an Irish pub; in the spirit that one of the guys said celebrated a meal that was offensive to all religions in equal measure :grin:
tc27
Posts: 2557
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:18 pm

HMS Hood sunk today in 1941 at the hands of KMS Bismarck - lost with all but three hands.

Image

The last ever photo taken of HMS Hood from HMS Prince of Wales a few hours before the battle.
User avatar
Paddington Bear
Posts: 6508
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:29 pm
Location: Hertfordshire

Would recommend Killing the Bismarck to anyone wanting to know more about the Denmark Strait and subsequent chase.
Goes into pretty vivid detail of battleship combat - a RN man finding Lieutenants without faces falling on top of him after POW's bridge was hit has stuck with me.
Old men forget: yet all shall be forgot, But he'll remember with advantages, What feats he did that day
Woddy
Posts: 346
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 5:20 pm

tc27 wrote: Mon May 24, 2021 3:00 pm HMS Hood sunk today in 1941 at the hands of KMS Bismarck - lost with all but three hands.

Image

The last ever photo taken of HMS Hood from HMS Prince of Wales a few hours before the battle.
A great-uncle of mine served on the Hood. Happened to be on shore leave when that photo was taken. He never really lost the sense of guilt at his good luck compared to that of his crewmates.
User avatar
Niegs
Posts: 3598
Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2020 3:20 pm

Not a bad pin!
Image

... I wonder if the tattoo was real or just inked on OR if the colourist didn't notice / forgot to make the area around it red. If it's fresh, it's going to have some colour around it.
tc27
Posts: 2557
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:18 pm

tc27 wrote: Mon May 24, 2021 3:00 pm HMS Hood sunk today in 1941 at the hands of KMS Bismarck - lost with all but three hands.

Image

The last ever photo taken of HMS Hood from HMS Prince of Wales a few hours before the battle.

Royal Navy taking revenge OTD in 1941 - HMS Rodney firing at Bismarck (surrounded by smoke in the background).

Incredible we can see pictures of this.

Image
Brazil
Posts: 565
Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2021 8:49 pm

Image

Technically this is the last ever picture of HMS Hood, filmed from Prinz Eugen.

Edit - Though I'm beginning to doubt that. This however is from Prinz Eugen:

Image
User avatar
Paddington Bear
Posts: 6508
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:29 pm
Location: Hertfordshire

By all accounts Bismarck had footage of the Hood going down and tried to evacuate it on their last float plane just before the end.
Old men forget: yet all shall be forgot, But he'll remember with advantages, What feats he did that day
Jock42
Posts: 2585
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:01 pm

tc27 wrote: Thu May 27, 2021 11:47 am
tc27 wrote: Mon May 24, 2021 3:00 pm HMS Hood sunk today in 1941 at the hands of KMS Bismarck - lost with all but three hands.

Image

The last ever photo taken of HMS Hood from HMS Prince of Wales a few hours before the battle.

Royal Navy taking revenge OTD in 1941 - HMS Rodney firing at Bismarck (surrounded by smoke in the background).

Incredible we can see pictures of this.

Image
I had the privilege of taking one of the swordfish pilots to hospital (he wasn't seriously unwell) a couple of years ago. Was an interesting 25 min journey.
User avatar
Niegs
Posts: 3598
Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2020 3:20 pm

I imagine movie producers will be knocking... heard an interview on BBC History Xtra and sounded like rip-roaring stuff!

Image

https://www.historyextra.com/period/sec ... h-garrett/
User avatar
Hong Kong
Posts: 417
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2020 1:04 am

Image
User avatar
Hong Kong
Posts: 417
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2020 1:04 am

Image
User avatar
mat the expat
Posts: 1508
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 11:12 pm

Niegs wrote: Fri Jun 04, 2021 5:23 pm I imagine movie producers will be knocking... heard an interview on BBC History Xtra and sounded like rip-roaring stuff!

Image

https://www.historyextra.com/period/sec ... h-garrett/
Listening to that today! :thumbup:
tc27
Posts: 2557
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:18 pm

Waterloo as a GIF.

User avatar
Paddington Bear
Posts: 6508
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:29 pm
Location: Hertfordshire

A whole day of wElLiNgToN's ArMy wAsN't aLl eNgLiSh
Old men forget: yet all shall be forgot, But he'll remember with advantages, What feats he did that day
Post Reply