The Tennis Thread
Twat being a twat shocker - with added idiocy
I drink and I forget things.
- eldanielfire
- Posts: 852
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:01 pm
- Insane_Homer
- Posts: 5389
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:14 pm
- Location: Leafy Surrey
Cmon guys, he's the real victim here
“Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true.”
- ScarfaceClaw
- Posts: 2623
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:11 pm
Dick move from No-Vax and he knew what he was doing but that line umpire went down like Neymar in a slight gust of wind.
- fishfoodie
- Posts: 8222
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm
It's America. I hope they sue him for a million, billion dollars ! ... and win !!ScarfaceClaw wrote: ↑Sun Sep 06, 2020 10:59 pm Dick move from No-Vax and he knew what he was doing but that line umpire went down like Neymar in a slight gust of wind.
- ScarfaceClaw
- Posts: 2623
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:11 pm
It being America they’re probably arguing that either the mask didn’t save her or if she was armed then it wouldn’t have happened.fishfoodie wrote: ↑Sun Sep 06, 2020 11:02 pmIt's America. I hope they sue him for a million, billion dollars ! ... and win !!ScarfaceClaw wrote: ↑Sun Sep 06, 2020 10:59 pm Dick move from No-Vax and he knew what he was doing but that line umpire went down like Neymar in a slight gust of wind.
- fishfoodie
- Posts: 8222
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm
I like it; we start arming umpiresScarfaceClaw wrote: ↑Sun Sep 06, 2020 11:09 pmIt being America they’re probably arguing that either the mask didn’t save her or if she was armed then it wouldn’t have happened.fishfoodie wrote: ↑Sun Sep 06, 2020 11:02 pmIt's America. I hope they sue him for a million, billion dollars ! ... and win !!ScarfaceClaw wrote: ↑Sun Sep 06, 2020 10:59 pm Dick move from No-Vax and he knew what he was doing but that line umpire went down like Neymar in a slight gust of wind.
Let's see the next mother-fucker complain about a line call, when the ump is tooled up !
I thought that at first but I guess getting a tennis ball in the throat when you were not expecting it would be a bit of a shock.ScarfaceClaw wrote: ↑Sun Sep 06, 2020 10:59 pm Dick move from No-Vax and he knew what he was doing but that line umpire went down like Neymar in a slight gust of wind.
I see has become the villain on Twitter etc. Bunch of cunts
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
An Andy Special.
He's done that so often - the Davis Cup was won that way.
He missed so many shots tonight that Andy Murray six years ago would have batted away without a second glance, but we are where we are, he is not that player now.
Having said that, I'd love him to get a good run in this tournament, he is a one of our all time greats
He is and a classic “we won’t appreciate him until he’s gone”. Certainly Scotland’s greatest sportsman and possibly the UKsTichtheid wrote: ↑Wed Jun 30, 2021 9:46 pm
An Andy Special.
He's done that so often - the Davis Cup was won that way.
He missed so many shots tonight that Andy Murray six years ago would have batted away without a second glance, but we are where we are, he is not that player now.
Having said that, I'd love him to get a good run in this tournament, he is a one of our all time greats
It’s strange because I kind of love him for battling on while at the same time thinking, mate, you’ve done enough, leave it.
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
Slick wrote: ↑Wed Jun 30, 2021 9:54 pmHe is and a classic “we won’t appreciate him until he’s gone”. Certainly Scotland’s greatest sportsman and possibly the UKsTichtheid wrote: ↑Wed Jun 30, 2021 9:46 pm
An Andy Special.
He's done that so often - the Davis Cup was won that way.
He missed so many shots tonight that Andy Murray six years ago would have batted away without a second glance, but we are where we are, he is not that player now.
Having said that, I'd love him to get a good run in this tournament, he is a one of our all time greats
It’s strange because I kind of love him for battling on while at the same time thinking, mate, you’ve done enough, leave it.
After the match tonight I allowed myself a "imagine if he won it" moment.
That would be Rocky territory
I have so much respect for Andy Murray, he trains to the extreme point, and he comes across as a good guy, his heart isn't ever far from his sleeve.
by non-Scots I'm going to go out on a limb and translate that as "English" and it's all down to a deliberate campaign to portray him as anti-English, which of course would be difficult given his personal life.
It all comes from a silly interview with him and Henman, they were teasing each other about a football tournament, Henman made derogatory remarks about Scottish football, as an English guy would to a Scottish mate, Murray was asked who he'd be supporting (as Henman had taken great glee in pointing out that Scotland hadn't qualified, he ripped the piss out of Andy for it), Murray replied, "I'll support whoever is playing England", him and Henman were laughing about it, it was two mates ribbing each other, nothing else.
Since then Murray has been the target of the wingnuts
That’s part of it but I don’t necessarily mean that. His dourness seems to annoy a lot of people whereas I think there is a lot of humour hidden in it which a lot of Scots “get”. Also a lot of his emotional responses resonate, and his lack of stiff upper lipTichtheid wrote: ↑Wed Jun 30, 2021 10:23 pmby non-Scots I'm going to go out on a limb and translate that as "English" and it's all down to a deliberate campaign to portray him as anti-English, which of course would be difficult given his personal life.
It all comes from a silly interview with him and Henman, they were teasing each other about a football tournament, Henman made derogatory remarks about Scottish football, as an English guy would to a Scottish mate, Murray was asked who he'd be supporting (as Henman had taken great glee in pointing out that Scotland hadn't qualified, he ripped the piss out of Andy for it), Murray replied, "I'll support whoever is playing England", him and Henman were laughing about it, it was two mates ribbing each other, nothing else.
Since then Murray has been the target of the wingnuts
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
Slick wrote: ↑Wed Jun 30, 2021 10:28 pmThat’s part of it but I don’t necessarily mean that. His dourness seems to annoy a lot of people whereas I think there is a lot of humour hidden in it which a lot of Scots “get”. Also a lot of his emotional responses resonate, and his lack of stiff upper lipTichtheid wrote: ↑Wed Jun 30, 2021 10:23 pmby non-Scots I'm going to go out on a limb and translate that as "English" and it's all down to a deliberate campaign to portray him as anti-English, which of course would be difficult given his personal life.
It all comes from a silly interview with him and Henman, they were teasing each other about a football tournament, Henman made derogatory remarks about Scottish football, as an English guy would to a Scottish mate, Murray was asked who he'd be supporting (as Henman had taken great glee in pointing out that Scotland hadn't qualified, he ripped the piss out of Andy for it), Murray replied, "I'll support whoever is playing England", him and Henman were laughing about it, it was two mates ribbing each other, nothing else.
Since then Murray has been the target of the wingnuts
To be honest, too much dourness and lack of stiff upper lip, being too emotional isn't really a consistent criticism.
I think the public would have had a different idea of his persona if some of the tabloids hadn't gone all in with the "anti-English" stuff.
I think he's quite a normal Scottish bloke with a typical dry sense of humour. He does let his negative emotions show more than some other players, but I think that's what he needs to do to be competitive.Slick wrote: ↑Wed Jun 30, 2021 10:28 pmThat’s part of it but I don’t necessarily mean that. His dourness seems to annoy a lot of people whereas I think there is a lot of humour hidden in it which a lot of Scots “get”. Also a lot of his emotional responses resonate, and his lack of stiff upper lipTichtheid wrote: ↑Wed Jun 30, 2021 10:23 pmby non-Scots I'm going to go out on a limb and translate that as "English" and it's all down to a deliberate campaign to portray him as anti-English, which of course would be difficult given his personal life.
It all comes from a silly interview with him and Henman, they were teasing each other about a football tournament, Henman made derogatory remarks about Scottish football, as an English guy would to a Scottish mate, Murray was asked who he'd be supporting (as Henman had taken great glee in pointing out that Scotland hadn't qualified, he ripped the piss out of Andy for it), Murray replied, "I'll support whoever is playing England", him and Henman were laughing about it, it was two mates ribbing each other, nothing else.
Since then Murray has been the target of the wingnuts
-
- Posts: 3585
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 9:37 am
I think it's a nice end to the career to battle on and show the mentality that got him to the top briefly in tennis' best ever generation by far.Slick wrote: ↑Wed Jun 30, 2021 9:54 pmHe is and a classic “we won’t appreciate him until he’s gone”. Certainly Scotland’s greatest sportsman and possibly the UKsTichtheid wrote: ↑Wed Jun 30, 2021 9:46 pm
An Andy Special.
He's done that so often - the Davis Cup was won that way.
He missed so many shots tonight that Andy Murray six years ago would have batted away without a second glance, but we are where we are, he is not that player now.
Having said that, I'd love him to get a good run in this tournament, he is a one of our all time greats
It’s strange because I kind of love him for battling on while at the same time thinking, mate, you’ve done enough, leave it.
I kind of forgot how much I love watching Murray in a proper battle.
sadly I think that was his Waterloo, I would stake my right nut on him going no further( which will be good for my nerves)Tichtheid wrote: ↑Wed Jun 30, 2021 9:59 pmSlick wrote: ↑Wed Jun 30, 2021 9:54 pmHe is and a classic “we won’t appreciate him until he’s gone”. Certainly Scotland’s greatest sportsman and possibly the UKsTichtheid wrote: ↑Wed Jun 30, 2021 9:46 pm
An Andy Special.
He's done that so often - the Davis Cup was won that way.
He missed so many shots tonight that Andy Murray six years ago would have batted away without a second glance, but we are where we are, he is not that player now.
Having said that, I'd love him to get a good run in this tournament, he is a one of our all time greats
It’s strange because I kind of love him for battling on while at the same time thinking, mate, you’ve done enough, leave it.
After the match tonight I allowed myself a "imagine if he won it" moment.
That would be Rocky territory
I have so much respect for Andy Murray, he trains to the extreme point, and he comes across as a good guy, his heart isn't ever far from his sleeve.
I wonder how many Grand Slam titles Murray would have won in a previous era. Thinking back to the 90s, Sampras was a great player but he didn't have a lot of competition.I like neeps wrote: ↑Thu Jul 01, 2021 8:35 amI think it's a nice end to the career to battle on and show the mentality that got him to the top briefly in tennis' best ever generation by far.Slick wrote: ↑Wed Jun 30, 2021 9:54 pmHe is and a classic “we won’t appreciate him until he’s gone”. Certainly Scotland’s greatest sportsman and possibly the UKsTichtheid wrote: ↑Wed Jun 30, 2021 9:46 pm
An Andy Special.
He's done that so often - the Davis Cup was won that way.
He missed so many shots tonight that Andy Murray six years ago would have batted away without a second glance, but we are where we are, he is not that player now.
Having said that, I'd love him to get a good run in this tournament, he is a one of our all time greats
It’s strange because I kind of love him for battling on while at the same time thinking, mate, you’ve done enough, leave it.
I kind of forgot how much I love watching Murray in a proper battle.
Sir Chris Hoy has a pretty big case for greatest Scottish sportsperson IMO. The UCI removed his best event from the Olympics and then went on to help dominate Olympic cycling and was alsoa double digit world champion too. Hendry also dominated a sport like few do too. But a discussion for another thread on another day and certainly not a slight on SAM. Perhaps best judged in 15 years time when we aren't still within his career.
- Chrysoprase
- Posts: 255
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 4:59 am
Agreed, he had to dig deep for that and has played a four set match and a five set match already this week - don't see how he can possibly reach the same levels again with only 48 hours rest. He's going to be up against someone who's ranked 10th in the world who's had a lot more recovery time.Openside wrote: ↑Thu Jul 01, 2021 9:00 amsadly I think that was his Waterloo, I would stake my right nut on him going no further( which will be good for my nerves)SpoilerShow
Those types of debates are dangerous. He would have won more but how many more are questionable probably 10-14 IMO. Players weren't as professional as they are now with the travelling teams they have, and they didn't need to be. Agassi won 7 or 8 slams and he spent most of the 90s high or pissed.robmatic wrote: ↑Thu Jul 01, 2021 9:05 amI wonder how many Grand Slam titles Murray would have won in a previous era. Thinking back to the 90s, Sampras was a great player but he didn't have a lot of competition.I like neeps wrote: ↑Thu Jul 01, 2021 8:35 amI think it's a nice end to the career to battle on and show the mentality that got him to the top briefly in tennis' best ever generation by far.
I kind of forgot how much I love watching Murray in a proper battle.
There were still some very good player back then and there was a far bigger difference in surfaces IIRC. Wimbledon was won by very good players in the 90's; Edberg, Sampras and Agassi, and Stich was decent. Krajiceck hit a purple patch and beat Sampras who was nearly unbeatable on grass on his way to winning.
My memories of 90s tennis is hazy but I am sure there were players who when looking back may be viewed as lesser quality than they really were because players were more specialist and were excellent for a far shorter time than we have seen with the big 3 who won their first slams in the 00's and Murray in 2012. Rafter for example looked top class at the US open for a brief time and Brugera and Kuerton looked practically unbeatable at the French for a couple of years.
The big difference between now and then is that Wimbledon is a LOT slower - they changed the grass mix sometime in the early 00s which slower things down, but retained the variable bounce more or less. Sampras would have been far less effective today, and Murray's game would have worked less well back then.Big D wrote: ↑Thu Jul 01, 2021 9:27 amThose types of debates are dangerous. He would have won more but how many more are questionable probably 10-14 IMO. Players weren't as professional as they are now with the travelling teams they have, and they didn't need to be. Agassi won 7 or 8 slams and he spent most of the 90s high or pissed.robmatic wrote: ↑Thu Jul 01, 2021 9:05 amI wonder how many Grand Slam titles Murray would have won in a previous era. Thinking back to the 90s, Sampras was a great player but he didn't have a lot of competition.I like neeps wrote: ↑Thu Jul 01, 2021 8:35 am
I think it's a nice end to the career to battle on and show the mentality that got him to the top briefly in tennis' best ever generation by far.
I kind of forgot how much I love watching Murray in a proper battle.
There were still some very good player back then and there was a far bigger difference in surfaces IIRC. Wimbledon was won by very good players in the 90's; Edberg, Sampras and Agassi, and Stich was decent. Krajiceck hit a purple patch and beat Sampras who was nearly unbeatable on grass on his way to winning.
My memories of 90s tennis is hazy but I am sure there were players who when looking back may be viewed as lesser quality than they really were because players were more specialist and were excellent for a far shorter time than we have seen with the big 3 who won their first slams in the 00's and Murray in 2012. Rafter for example looked top class at the US open for a brief time and Brugera and Kuerton looked practically unbeatable at the French for a couple of years.
What's definitely unusual is the absolute dominance of the big 3, with a relatively short period of them being the big 4; in that sense Murray is far more like a 90s player with a relatively brief spell of dominance
Fed won his first slam in 2003, from then to now there have been around 65 Slam tournaments (I can't be arsed looking up what was his first and how many were cancelled last year).
Since then Fed has notched up 20 wins, Nadal 20 and Djokovic 19.
59 of the 65 available tournaments have been won by three players.
Since then Fed has notched up 20 wins, Nadal 20 and Djokovic 19.
59 of the 65 available tournaments have been won by three players.