So, coronavirus...
-
- Posts: 2223
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 4:04 pm
I don't know what Clifton-Brown means by the Gillick doctrine will become the norm, it's already the norm and quite reasonably so. Does he mean there'll be a huge divide between parents and children, maybe that's what their analysis tells them in advance, but I'd assume it will not be the norm, and where there is a split the parents and child discussing it with the clinician will resolve much of any small problem that arises before we get to a child being deemed to be able to and actually overriding the wishes of the parent? And that creating a huge divide now between parents and children will mean future medial treatments will see Gillick employed as a norm? I don't even know what % of kids use Gillick for something like contraception, not a majority I'm assuming, maybe he has a different definition of 'norm'
I think they've rather moved the goalposts here on what's covered by Gillick as they've bolted on an undefinable aspect of mental health to bump the benefits over the risks, the JCVI still seemed fairly sold the risks outweighed (perhaps only marginally) the benefits. And thus imo vaxxing the kids is rather more about society than the kids directly and that seems a little different. Not going to be an issue in out house, the kid'll want the vaccine and we'll be satisfied it's her call so she can have parental consent from the outset. I'm still a little iffy mind where there isn't consent that a child can elect for a procedure that may represent more risk to them than benefit, that does seem an ethical shift, and one that could and should be discussed, and this was almost certainly going to be an issue from some months back so they could've gotten on with it by now.
I think they've rather moved the goalposts here on what's covered by Gillick as they've bolted on an undefinable aspect of mental health to bump the benefits over the risks, the JCVI still seemed fairly sold the risks outweighed (perhaps only marginally) the benefits. And thus imo vaxxing the kids is rather more about society than the kids directly and that seems a little different. Not going to be an issue in out house, the kid'll want the vaccine and we'll be satisfied it's her call so she can have parental consent from the outset. I'm still a little iffy mind where there isn't consent that a child can elect for a procedure that may represent more risk to them than benefit, that does seem an ethical shift, and one that could and should be discussed, and this was almost certainly going to be an issue from some months back so they could've gotten on with it by now.
Can you point to any research into coronavirus spread prior to January 2020?Paddington Bear wrote: ↑Tue Sep 14, 2021 10:53 am I'm not convinced the science actually changed, maybe what we paid attention to did. See the SEA approach compared to ours. As I say, we'll pretend it didn't happen but interesting nonetheless.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
- Uncle fester
- Posts: 4736
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 9:42 pm
The same scientists who backed the British government's "herd immunity" plan?Lobby wrote: ↑Tue Sep 14, 2021 10:45 amThere is also the issue that, at the start of the pandemic when the NHS and care homes were struggling to obtain PPE (including surgical masks) in sufficient numbers, telling the general public to also wear masks would have only led to more shortages. It was clearly more important to make sure masks were available for those that needed them most, and this allied to (at the time) limited evidence of their efficacy in reducing the spread amongst the general population, meant that there was no point in promoting their general use.Biffer wrote: ↑Tue Sep 14, 2021 10:25 amWell yeah. That’s what happens in science - as the evidence changes you change your view. So far as I understand it (although this could be wrong) at the start of the pandemic, we were prepared for a flu pandemic so in the absence of other evidence, we proceeded on that basis. Flu spreads largely through surface contact. As we learnt a bit more, it became more evident that it was spreading through some form of airborne spread. At first that was thought to be droplets, then droplets and aerosols. That’s when mask became a lot more relevant.Paddington Bear wrote: ↑Tue Sep 14, 2021 9:33 am Not the main point with masks but there was a very interesting shift around last summer from people 'in the know' who went from masks don't work to masks being the crucial preventive measure. We'll probably largely pretend it didn't happen but it absolutely did and I find the psychology of it interesting.
Yeah, they were pretty impartial and led by science alright.
- Uncle fester
- Posts: 4736
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 9:42 pm
They've been tracking coronavirus infections for nearly 100 years now. Human coronavirus has been known since 1960's. SARS-1 and MERS are two of the more dangerous ones to pop up before the current covid 19.Biffer wrote: ↑Tue Sep 14, 2021 11:22 amCan you point to any research into coronavirus spread prior to January 2020?Paddington Bear wrote: ↑Tue Sep 14, 2021 10:53 am I'm not convinced the science actually changed, maybe what we paid attention to did. See the SEA approach compared to ours. As I say, we'll pretend it didn't happen but interesting nonetheless.
There’s been research into coronaviruses, their genetics, the diseases they cause. Anything about their spread and infection routes?Uncle fester wrote: ↑Tue Sep 14, 2021 10:18 pmThey've been tracking coronavirus infections for nearly 100 years now. Human coronavirus has been known since 1960's. SARS-1 and MERS are two of the more dangerous ones to pop up before the current covid 19.Biffer wrote: ↑Tue Sep 14, 2021 11:22 amCan you point to any research into coronavirus spread prior to January 2020?Paddington Bear wrote: ↑Tue Sep 14, 2021 10:53 am I'm not convinced the science actually changed, maybe what we paid attention to did. See the SEA approach compared to ours. As I say, we'll pretend it didn't happen but interesting nonetheless.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
In America, mask wearing instantly became a political thing. In the UK, the government scientists recommended not wearing them. Meanwhile in the rest of the world people started wearing masks without any issues.Uncle fester wrote: ↑Tue Sep 14, 2021 10:03 pmThe same scientists who backed the British government's "herd immunity" plan?Lobby wrote: ↑Tue Sep 14, 2021 10:45 amThere is also the issue that, at the start of the pandemic when the NHS and care homes were struggling to obtain PPE (including surgical masks) in sufficient numbers, telling the general public to also wear masks would have only led to more shortages. It was clearly more important to make sure masks were available for those that needed them most, and this allied to (at the time) limited evidence of their efficacy in reducing the spread amongst the general population, meant that there was no point in promoting their general use.Biffer wrote: ↑Tue Sep 14, 2021 10:25 am
Well yeah. That’s what happens in science - as the evidence changes you change your view. So far as I understand it (although this could be wrong) at the start of the pandemic, we were prepared for a flu pandemic so in the absence of other evidence, we proceeded on that basis. Flu spreads largely through surface contact. As we learnt a bit more, it became more evident that it was spreading through some form of airborne spread. At first that was thought to be droplets, then droplets and aerosols. That’s when mask became a lot more relevant.
Yeah, they were pretty impartial and led by science alright.
- Paddington Bear
- Posts: 6508
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:29 pm
- Location: Hertfordshire
Yeah maybe I'm being parochial (haven't left the country since the pandemic anyway). However 'masks don't work' was the sincerely held position of much of the 'smarter' end of British life, until it wasn't. No dig at anyone, I just find the psychology interesting.Calculon wrote: ↑Wed Sep 15, 2021 7:55 amIn America, mask wearing instantly became a political thing. In the UK, the government scientists recommended not wearing them. Meanwhile in the rest of the world people started wearing masks without any issues.Uncle fester wrote: ↑Tue Sep 14, 2021 10:03 pmThe same scientists who backed the British government's "herd immunity" plan?Lobby wrote: ↑Tue Sep 14, 2021 10:45 am
There is also the issue that, at the start of the pandemic when the NHS and care homes were struggling to obtain PPE (including surgical masks) in sufficient numbers, telling the general public to also wear masks would have only led to more shortages. It was clearly more important to make sure masks were available for those that needed them most, and this allied to (at the time) limited evidence of their efficacy in reducing the spread amongst the general population, meant that there was no point in promoting their general use.
Yeah, they were pretty impartial and led by science alright.
Old men forget: yet all shall be forgot, But he'll remember with advantages, What feats he did that day
Neither did Japan but wearing masks has long been a common practice here for colds, hay fever, etc. etc.
- fishfoodie
- Posts: 8581
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm
Another vile scumbag bites the dust
I don't know of any flavor of Christianity, that allows such a vile individual ending up in "Heaven" !Bob Enyart, conservative firebrand and pastor, dies of COVID-19
Conservative firebrand Bob Enyart, the pastor of the Denver Bible Church and indelible talk show host, has died from COVID-19, his radio co-host announced Monday on Facebook.
“Bob Enyart was one of the smartest, and without question, the wisest person I’ve known,” Fred Williams, Enyart’s co-host on the Real Science Radio show, said in a post.
Enyart and his wife refused to get the vaccine due to abortion concerns, he said on his website.
In October, Enyart successfully sued the state over mask mandates and capacity limits in churches, a rare legal victory against broad public health mandates instituted during the pandemic.
Pushing the limits never bothered Enyart.
He once traveled to New Zealand for the sole purpose of being arrested with a “Clinton is a Rapist” banner, according to a 1999 Westword profile.
On his old TV show, Bob Enyart Live, the host would “gleefully read obituaries of AIDS sufferers while cranking ‘Another One Bites the Dust’ by Queen,” Westword reported.
...
“Heaven’s gain has left an enormous hole here on earth,” Williams wrote. “Bob’s enduring legacy will live on with the treasure trove he leaves behind.”
- Insane_Homer
- Posts: 5473
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:14 pm
- Location: Leafy Surrey
UK #DailyCovidUpdate | 15th September 2021
- Cases: 7,312,683 (+30,597)
- Average Cases: 31,772.14
- Deaths (28-day): 134,647 (+201)
- Deaths (60-day): 153,835 (+236)
- Average Deaths: 139.00
- Vaccine [1st dose]: 48,480,178 (+21,478)
- Vaccine [2nd dose]: 44,170,373 (+61,627) https://t.co/qaZ0cSrcx1
“Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true.”
In the early days the UK scientists appeared to believe that Covid transmission was predominantly by physically touching a contaminated surface. It soon becam apparent that it was airborn particles that were the biggest danger - hence, the move to masks.
- Uncle fester
- Posts: 4736
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 9:42 pm
Or they let themselves be "influenced". There was very clear political pressure on the decision making process and it was only the big public uproar that reversed the initial "herd immunity" strategy.
- fishfoodie
- Posts: 8581
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm
Covid really has turbo charged Darwin; it's no wonder the GOP is shitting themselves over the mid-terrms; Ruberts great; "culture wars", plan has meant that they've gone from being, odds on to retake the house; to scrambing to work out if they'll have killed so many of their own supporters, that they may end up even worse off.
You'd have to have a heart of stone not to laugh.
You'd have to have a heart of stone not to laugh.
- mat the expat
- Posts: 1508
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 11:12 pm
- fishfoodie
- Posts: 8581
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm
I’ll stand corrected from assfly maybe but I think they haven’t been doing too badly on the vaccine roll out.
In saying that, Kenyatta was here a few weeks ago meeting Boris so I expect there was some hard lobbying going on
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
According to the Web 1.6% of population fully vaccinated in Kenya as opposed to 13% in South Africa. That gap is widening. both figures are too low tbh.
I find those figures a bit hard to believe for Kenya from what I’ve been hearingCalculon wrote: ↑Sun Sep 19, 2021 11:12 amAccording to the Web 1.6% of population fully vaccinated in Kenya as opposed to 13% in South Africa. That gap is widening. both figures are too low tbh.
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
Maybe, I've had another look and also got a figure of 2.9 % fully vaccinated for Kenya. According to ourworldindata.org., 3.29million doses administered in Kenya, total population a little bit over 55 million. I would think the doses figure should be fairly accurate.Slick wrote: ↑Sun Sep 19, 2021 11:32 amI find those figures a bit hard to believe for Kenya from what I’ve been hearing
Despite the pretense of "following the science" it's pretty obvious the decisions were based on political lobbying and prejudice. Doesn't say much for SAs ability to lobby the UK government though. Also looks a bit silly when a vaccinated saffa can fly into Germany without having to quarantine or self isolate but is completely barred from entering the UK.
-
- Posts: 642
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 10:11 am
I've been offered the vaccine recently, though I am reluctant to take it as I have natural immunity from infection. My older relatives have now received it.
I saw on Twitter that the British 'modellers' got their summer modelling completely wrong and were demanding restrictions. Fortunately, for once, a government ignored their demands for a hyper-safe hand-holding world, and the sky didn't fall in.
I saw on Twitter that the British 'modellers' got their summer modelling completely wrong and were demanding restrictions. Fortunately, for once, a government ignored their demands for a hyper-safe hand-holding world, and the sky didn't fall in.
Natural immunity wanes in the same way as the vaccine, more or less.Lemoentjie wrote: ↑Sun Sep 19, 2021 5:50 pm I've been offered the vaccine recently, though I am reluctant to take it as I have natural immunity from infection. My older relatives have now received it.
I saw on Twitter that the British 'modellers' got their summer modelling completely wrong and were demanding restrictions. Fortunately, for once, a government ignored their demands for a hyper-safe hand-holding world, and the sky didn't fall in.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
- fishfoodie
- Posts: 8581
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm
90% of over 16s now vaccinated in Ireland !
Just a 7 day average of c145 deaths a day which is 1000 deaths a week or c50,000 per annum in the UK at the moment and one of the highest case rates per 100k of population across comparable countries in the world. Just over 135,000 deaths from covid so far. NHS is struggling and army are called in to help support NHS/ambulance services - 8,000 patients with covid currently in hospital and 1,000 in ICU. Biggest ever in history backlog of patients on our waiting lists for treatment, c5.3 million, and winter will see this get much, much worse. Many routine and non routine/emergency operations are being cancelled due to lack of capacity and patients are turning up sicker and with more advanced illness due to delays in treatment. Care sector is collapsing due to lack of staff, don't mention Brexit, and creating a backlog of patients in hospital who have nowhere to be discharged to. Our 'world beating' vaccine roll-out has slowed down and is getting overtaken by the likes of Spain, Belgium, Ireland and Denmark despite our head start. Apart from all that everything here is hunky dory and apparently the pandemic is over in the UK.Lemoentjie wrote: ↑Sun Sep 19, 2021 5:50 pm I've been offered the vaccine recently, though I am reluctant to take it as I have natural immunity from infection. My older relatives have now received it.
I saw on Twitter that the British 'modellers' got their summer modelling completely wrong and were demanding restrictions. Fortunately, for once, a government ignored their demands for a hyper-safe hand-holding world, and the sky didn't fall in.
Personally, I would get the vaccine, both doses, there is clear evidence that it works, is safe and it would provide extra protection as any 'natural immunity' starts to wane or if new variants come along. It would also slow down, but not prevent, any transmission from yourself to older relatives and vice versa - remember the vaccine offers c80-85% protection, natural immunity probably less, which although very high is not 100%, so they can still become infected and ill with covid. I would have as many barriers as possible ie vaccine, regular testing, masks, etc to catching and/or spreading the virus. It is easy to do, costs feck all and may save a life.
I am not pleased the vaccine roll out has slowed down to trickle and we have dithered so long over offering it to children but I would swap our success in the spring for having a marginally greater % vaccinated now. We are at 90%is with at least one shot which is the benchmark that was given for a successful campaign.
Don't disagree - I just think it's interesting that the 'world beating' has been quietly dropped by the Gov when talking about the vaccination roll out.tc27 wrote: ↑Sun Sep 19, 2021 6:46 pm I am not pleased the vaccine roll out has slowed down to trickle and we have dithered so long over offering it to children but I would swap our success in the spring for having a marginally greater % vaccinated now. We are at 90%is with at least one shot which is the benchmark that was given for a successful campaign.
I want a booster next month.tc27 wrote: ↑Sun Sep 19, 2021 6:46 pm I am not pleased the vaccine roll out has slowed down to trickle and we have dithered so long over offering it to children but I would swap our success in the spring for having a marginally greater % vaccinated now. We are at 90%is with at least one shot which is the benchmark that was given for a successful campaign.
don't be a twat, taking the vaccine is only going to give another boost to your immune systemLemoentjie wrote: ↑Sun Sep 19, 2021 5:50 pm I've been offered the vaccine recently, though I am reluctant to take it as I have natural immunity from infection. My older relatives have now received it.
Too late for the 1st part, but not too late for the 2ndCalculon wrote: ↑Sun Sep 19, 2021 9:36 pmdon't be a twat, taking the vaccine is only going to give another boost to your immune systemLemoentjie wrote: ↑Sun Sep 19, 2021 5:50 pm I've been offered the vaccine recently, though I am reluctant to take it as I have natural immunity from infection. My older relatives have now received it.

-
- Posts: 642
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 10:11 am
Is it?Calculon wrote: ↑Sun Sep 19, 2021 9:36 pmdon't be a twat, taking the vaccine is only going to give another boost to your immune systemLemoentjie wrote: ↑Sun Sep 19, 2021 5:50 pm I've been offered the vaccine recently, though I am reluctant to take it as I have natural immunity from infection. My older relatives have now received it.
I don't have any problems with vaccination (apart from the crazy profit margins that Pfizer are putting on their product) and if I hadn't been previously infected, then a vaccination would be a less risky method of protection that infection.
Maybe I can just ask for 1 dose