The Official Cricket Thread

Where goats go to escape
User avatar
ScarfaceClaw
Posts: 2623
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:11 pm

That ball that got Stokes was a thing of beauty.
Biffer
Posts: 9141
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 6:43 pm

ScarfaceClaw wrote: Thu Aug 06, 2020 4:36 pm That ball that got Stokes was a thing of beauty.
Indeed.

This lad Naseem looks dangerous :wtf:
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
User avatar
JM2K6
Posts: 9797
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2020 10:43 am

Root went, great catch off a spinner by keeper. Not that I'm making a point or anything. Buttler survives until close.

Ollie Pope has made batting look very easy compared to everyone else. 46 off 67 out of a total of 92/4 from 28 overs.

This has probably been my favourite Test of the summer so far.
Biffer
Posts: 9141
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 6:43 pm

JM2K6 wrote: Thu Aug 06, 2020 6:03 pm Root went, great catch off a spinner by keeper. Not that I'm making a point or anything. Buttler survives until close.

Ollie Pope has made batting look very easy compared to everyone else. 46 off 67 out of a total of 92/4 from 28 overs.

This has probably been my favourite Test of the summer so far.
Yeah, can you imagine the atmosphere this afternoon if there'd been 20,000 people in there? Would've been electric.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
And 1 guest
Posts: 429
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:51 pm

It was massively enjoyable to watch. Masood played a fantastic innings, then Pakistanis steamers were brilliant. Good stuff from Pope, but he needs some back up tomorrow.
User avatar
Insane_Homer
Posts: 5389
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:14 pm
Location: Leafy Surrey

first hour this morning crucial for Eng.
“Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true.”
Biffer
Posts: 9141
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 6:43 pm

Insane_Homer wrote: Fri Aug 07, 2020 6:19 am first hour this morning crucial for Eng.
Im confident Buttler will not last the first hour.

I saw this posted elsewhere
Anyone, anyone who has watched cricket and studied the game over many, many years, knows the genuinely gifted player when s/he sees one. When it comes to wicket-keeping, there is a wide ocean of difference between the player who is made into a w/k and one who is gifted in that capacity. That’s the difference between Buttler and Foakes.
Sums up wicket keeping for me. It’s an absolute joy to watch a great wicketkeeper work, but it seems now that having someone who averages 40 and can do a decent job behind the stumps is considered a better option than having someone who averages 30 and takes the opportunities Buttler missed yesterday. Which is obvious nonsense.

I really miss watching top quality wicketkeepers. There are so few allowed to play at international level.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
Big D
Posts: 3927
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2020 11:55 am

Other than being a good mate of the captain and the selectors golden boy I don't see what Buttler brings to the test team.

Not the best wicket keeper available and the poorest batting average of the 3 available options (small sample size at test level for Foakes). I am a fan of his white ball cricket work but the very rare 50 here and there doesn't cut it.

Next time Stokes can't bowl I would consider giving the gloves to Pope and playing Crawley. On recent efforts 6 is about 1 maybe 2 spots too high for Buttler.
Big D
Posts: 3927
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2020 11:55 am

Biffer wrote: Fri Aug 07, 2020 8:07 am
Insane_Homer wrote: Fri Aug 07, 2020 6:19 am first hour this morning crucial for Eng.
Im confident Buttler will not last the first hour.

I saw this posted elsewhere
Anyone, anyone who has watched cricket and studied the game over many, many years, knows the genuinely gifted player when s/he sees one. When it comes to wicket-keeping, there is a wide ocean of difference between the player who is made into a w/k and one who is gifted in that capacity. That’s the difference between Buttler and Foakes.
Sums up wicket keeping for me. It’s an absolute joy to watch a great wicketkeeper work, but it seems now that having someone who averages 40 and can do a decent job behind the stumps is considered a better option than having someone who averages 30 and takes the opportunities Buttler missed yesterday. Which is obvious nonsense.

I really miss watching top quality wicketkeepers. There are so few allowed to play at international level.
Ironically Buttler is the one averaging 30 (32 I think) and Foakes mid 40's in a small sample size and would expect regression. Woakes or Bess may be Popes best hope for a partner.
User avatar
Un Pilier
Posts: 700
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2020 9:22 am

Biffer wrote: Fri Aug 07, 2020 8:07 am
Insane_Homer wrote: Fri Aug 07, 2020 6:19 am first hour this morning crucial for Eng.
Im confident Buttler will not last the first hour.

I saw this posted elsewhere
Anyone, anyone who has watched cricket and studied the game over many, many years, knows the genuinely gifted player when s/he sees one. When it comes to wicket-keeping, there is a wide ocean of difference between the player who is made into a w/k and one who is gifted in that capacity. That’s the difference between Buttler and Foakes.
Sums up wicket keeping for me. It’s an absolute joy to watch a great wicketkeeper work, but it seems now that having someone who averages 40 and can do a decent job behind the stumps is considered a better option than having someone who averages 30 and takes the opportunities Buttler missed yesterday. Which is obvious nonsense.

I really miss watching top quality wicketkeepers. There are so few allowed to play at international level.
Me too. I grew up in Derbyshire and used to love watching Bob Taylor. An artist with the gloves; he holds the world record for dismissals. Alan Knott was always a great watch too.
User avatar
JM2K6
Posts: 9797
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2020 10:43 am

Big D wrote: Fri Aug 07, 2020 8:22 am Other than being a good mate of the captain and the selectors golden boy I don't see what Buttler brings to the test team.

Not the best wicket keeper available and the poorest batting average of the 3 available options (small sample size at test level for Foakes). I am a fan of his white ball cricket work but the very rare 50 here and there doesn't cut it.

Next time Stokes can't bowl I would consider giving the gloves to Pope and playing Crawley. On recent efforts 6 is about 1 maybe 2 spots too high for Buttler.
By all accounts he's an excellent dressing room presence - let's face it, he's there almost all the time when we're batting - and is a solid and dependable lieutenant. But, more importantly, dropping him would be an admission by Ed 'FICJAM' Smith that he was wrong, so it can only happen in extreme circumstances.
Biffer
Posts: 9141
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 6:43 pm

Big D wrote: Fri Aug 07, 2020 8:24 am
Biffer wrote: Fri Aug 07, 2020 8:07 am
Insane_Homer wrote: Fri Aug 07, 2020 6:19 am first hour this morning crucial for Eng.
Im confident Buttler will not last the first hour.

I saw this posted elsewhere
Anyone, anyone who has watched cricket and studied the game over many, many years, knows the genuinely gifted player when s/he sees one. When it comes to wicket-keeping, there is a wide ocean of difference between the player who is made into a w/k and one who is gifted in that capacity. That’s the difference between Buttler and Foakes.
Sums up wicket keeping for me. It’s an absolute joy to watch a great wicketkeeper work, but it seems now that having someone who averages 40 and can do a decent job behind the stumps is considered a better option than having someone who averages 30 and takes the opportunities Buttler missed yesterday. Which is obvious nonsense.

I really miss watching top quality wicketkeepers. There are so few allowed to play at international level.
Ironically Buttler is the one averaging 30 (32 I think) and Foakes mid 40's in a small sample size and would expect regression. Woakes or Bess may be Popes best hope for a partner.
Foakes also averages significantly higher than Buttler in First Class cricket. It seems it's only Ed Smith's stubbornness that's keeping Buttler in the team.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
Biffer
Posts: 9141
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 6:43 pm

Buttler is the worst wicketkeeper to spin bowlers in test cricket over the last two years

https://www.cricviz.com/jos-buttler-the-wicketkeeper
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
And 1 guest
Posts: 429
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:51 pm

No matter what the stats say, England won't drop Buttler. If and when they lose this game they'll fiddle with the bowling attack, like they always do.
User avatar
Insane_Homer
Posts: 5389
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:14 pm
Location: Leafy Surrey

first hour negotiated, should be able to push on and bat all day now. perfect conditions.
“Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true.”
User avatar
Sandstorm
Posts: 10883
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:05 pm
Location: England

JM2K6 wrote: Fri Aug 07, 2020 9:19 am
Big D wrote: Fri Aug 07, 2020 8:22 am Other than being a good mate of the captain and the selectors golden boy I don't see what Buttler brings to the test team.

Not the best wicket keeper available and the poorest batting average of the 3 available options (small sample size at test level for Foakes). I am a fan of his white ball cricket work but the very rare 50 here and there doesn't cut it.

Next time Stokes can't bowl I would consider giving the gloves to Pope and playing Crawley. On recent efforts 6 is about 1 maybe 2 spots too high for Buttler.
By all accounts he's an excellent dressing room presence - let's face it, he's there almost all the time when we're batting - and is a solid and dependable lieutenant. But, more importantly, dropping him would be an admission by Ed 'FICJAM' Smith that he was wrong, so it can only happen in extreme circumstances.
Smith will try to keep Buttler in the side after he tests positive for Covid.
Biffer
Posts: 9141
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 6:43 pm

Watching Rizwan keeping up to the stumps to the seamer emphasises it even more. I wonder how much of that is a wee bit of psychology to get into Buttler's head.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
Big D
Posts: 3927
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2020 11:55 am

Fairs fair. Buttler is digging in here. Hopefully doesn't throw it away and can get his rewards later in the day.

Pope is pretty sharp on the singles - good to see.
And 1 guest
Posts: 429
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:51 pm

And Pope's a goner. Brilliant ball from Naseem.
User avatar
Sandstorm
Posts: 10883
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:05 pm
Location: England

Naseem gets Pope with an almost unplayable lifter on off stump. 62 runs
User avatar
JM2K6
Posts: 9797
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2020 10:43 am

Pope gets an almost unplayable delivery from Naseem. Did well to hit it. Caught in the slips, gone for 62 - he looked very good, England should probably crumble from here.
Biffer
Posts: 9141
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 6:43 pm

Pope gone. Vicious ball and a sharp catch low in the gully.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
Biffer
Posts: 9141
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 6:43 pm

Woakes taking one on the head from Naseem.

This Pakistan attack is exceptional.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
A6D6E6
Posts: 81
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 4:02 pm

Biffer wrote: Fri Aug 07, 2020 11:24 am Woakes taking one on the head from Naseem.

This Pakistan attack is exceptional.
To be fair, that could be said of almost any Pakistan attack since I started watching cricket in the 80s. They produce some fantastic bowlers.
Biffer
Posts: 9141
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 6:43 pm

A6D6E6 wrote: Fri Aug 07, 2020 11:32 am
Biffer wrote: Fri Aug 07, 2020 11:24 am Woakes taking one on the head from Naseem.

This Pakistan attack is exceptional.
To be fair, that could be said of almost any Pakistan attack since I started watching cricket in the 80s. They produce some fantastic bowlers.
Yeah, but with Shaheen at 20 and Naseem at 17, they could be right back up to the days of Waqar and Wasim. Chuck in Shadab as a 21 year old leg break bowler and it could be great to watch for the next ten years.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
Big D
Posts: 3927
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2020 11:55 am

Buttler does a lot of good in the morning session but ultimately it is another failure.
Biffer
Posts: 9141
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 6:43 pm

Big D wrote: Fri Aug 07, 2020 12:53 pm Buttler does a lot of good in the morning session but ultimately it is another failure.
Beautiful ball to dismiss him but that score isn't enough to defend him being in the team.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
And 1 guest
Posts: 429
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:51 pm

There just seems to be a real threat from both ends with this Pakistan attack. It didn't feel like that when England were bowling.
And 1 guest
Posts: 429
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:51 pm

Awful shot from Woakes. It's Borad time so should be entertaining
Biffer
Posts: 9141
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 6:43 pm

Terrible shot from Woakes. Ears are probably still ringing from the one he took on the head though.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
User avatar
Sandstorm
Posts: 10883
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:05 pm
Location: England

171/8
User avatar
JM2K6
Posts: 9797
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2020 10:43 am

Biffer wrote: Fri Aug 07, 2020 1:26 pm Terrible shot from Woakes. Ears are probably still ringing from the one he took on the head though.
When, 10 innings ago? He's a dismal batsman at the moment.
User avatar
Insane_Homer
Posts: 5389
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:14 pm
Location: Leafy Surrey

England looking like they're going to give Pakistan a healthy first innings lead. It's going to be tough to salvage the test from here.
“Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true.”
Biffer
Posts: 9141
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 6:43 pm

JM2K6 wrote: Fri Aug 07, 2020 1:32 pm
Biffer wrote: Fri Aug 07, 2020 1:26 pm Terrible shot from Woakes. Ears are probably still ringing from the one he took on the head though.
When, 10 innings ago? He's a dismal batsman at the moment.
He took one today from Naseem. It bounced out to mid on.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
User avatar
JM2K6
Posts: 9797
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2020 10:43 am

Biffer wrote: Fri Aug 07, 2020 1:36 pm
JM2K6 wrote: Fri Aug 07, 2020 1:32 pm
Biffer wrote: Fri Aug 07, 2020 1:26 pm Terrible shot from Woakes. Ears are probably still ringing from the one he took on the head though.
When, 10 innings ago? He's a dismal batsman at the moment.
He took one today from Naseem. It bounced out to mid on.
I know - it's just being too charitable to blame that. He's been a rabbit for a while unfortunately - I have no idea why.
User avatar
fishfoodie
Posts: 8221
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm

Insane_Homer wrote: Fri Aug 07, 2020 1:32 pm England looking like they're going to give Pakistan a healthy first innings lead. It's going to be tough to salvage the test from here.
Not much chance of rain saving England this week.

Given the weather, & the match, it really is a pity to be playing behind closed doors :cry:
Biffer
Posts: 9141
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 6:43 pm

fishfoodie wrote: Fri Aug 07, 2020 1:46 pm
Insane_Homer wrote: Fri Aug 07, 2020 1:32 pm England looking like they're going to give Pakistan a healthy first innings lead. It's going to be tough to salvage the test from here.
Not much chance of rain saving England this week.

Given the weather, & the match, it really is a pity to be playing behind closed doors :cry:
Yeah, the atmosphere yesterday and today would have been excellent.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
User avatar
Sandstorm
Posts: 10883
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:05 pm
Location: England

I think England are missing the crowds more than any of their opponents this Summer. They really seem to respond to their fans.
User avatar
Sandstorm
Posts: 10883
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:05 pm
Location: England

Pakistan fielding is shite. Several run outs missed, dropped catch and the tail is wagging.
User avatar
JM2K6
Posts: 9797
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2020 10:43 am

Sandstorm wrote: Fri Aug 07, 2020 2:02 pm Pakistan fielding is shite. Several run outs missed, dropped catch and the tail is wagging.
Shadab had no right to get the ball as close to the stumps as he did on that near run out of Jimmy. He was on his knees and throwing as he twisted and missed by an inch.

Anyway, enjoying England's commitment to stereotypes here. Facing a seam attack of prodigious talent, threat, and skill, in their first innings, and they still contrive to give the legspinners 6 wickets.
Post Reply