Russia registers first corona vaccine
Russia registers first corona virus vaccine. Probably taken a few shortcuts but Putin happy that all checks have been made. His own daughter got a shot. Mass production to start beginning of 2021.
- ScarfaceClaw
- Posts: 2623
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:11 pm
I really hope it comes in a box with a picture of Salisbury Cathedral on it.
- tabascoboy
- Posts: 6474
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 8:22 am
- Location: 曇りの街
- Hal Jordan
- Posts: 4154
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 12:48 pm
- Location: Sector 2814
I assume Big Donny T will be queueing up to buy this?
Her immune system has improved immensely apparently, so the process seems to be well on its way..........tabascoboy wrote: ↑Tue Aug 11, 2020 11:17 amLet's hope she doesn't start to grow testicles and new ability to clean and jerk 150kg
I reckon they've done phase i or phase i/ii and said that'll do. Wouldn't take that one myself.
China have done something similar in that their vaccine went through phase i/ii and then decided to go to a massive phase iii/iv within their military, skipping a normal phase iii (which is a large controlled trial of volunteers, the oxford vaccine and the US moderna vaccine are now in this phase).
China have done something similar in that their vaccine went through phase i/ii and then decided to go to a massive phase iii/iv within their military, skipping a normal phase iii (which is a large controlled trial of volunteers, the oxford vaccine and the US moderna vaccine are now in this phase).
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
I'd "rather" China's response, as it's at least still controlled. In truth, I'd rather wait until proper testing is done!Biffer wrote: ↑Tue Aug 11, 2020 11:42 am I reckon they've done phase i or phase i/ii and said that'll do. Wouldn't take that one myself.
China have done something similar in that their vaccine went through phase i/ii and then decided to go to a massive phase iii/iv within their military, skipping a normal phase iii (which is a large controlled trial of volunteers, the oxford vaccine and the US moderna vaccine are now in this phase).
Russians gambling big time here, hopefully it doesn't bite them on the arse.
Give a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.
Yeah, they're still effectively having a large controlled trial, but it's pretty unethical as it doesn't involve volunteers (also doesn't cover the spread of demographics, so doesn't prove the fullrange of side effects across the population.).Raggs wrote: ↑Tue Aug 11, 2020 11:48 amI'd "rather" China's response, as it's at least still controlled. In truth, I'd rather wait until proper testing is done!Biffer wrote: ↑Tue Aug 11, 2020 11:42 am I reckon they've done phase i or phase i/ii and said that'll do. Wouldn't take that one myself.
China have done something similar in that their vaccine went through phase i/ii and then decided to go to a massive phase iii/iv within their military, skipping a normal phase iii (which is a large controlled trial of volunteers, the oxford vaccine and the US moderna vaccine are now in this phase).
Russians gambling big time here, hopefully it doesn't bite them on the arse.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
Mass production only in 2021 so a few months of random testing before that. Risk could be worth it.
- tabascoboy
- Posts: 6474
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 8:22 am
- Location: 曇りの街
Well TBF if it works for the population, congrats; if it doesn't work the information will probably never be revealed.
Or she probably didn’t get injected, and Russia propaganda about his daughter in order to just infect everyone without them knowing and not worrying about fevers which prevail and hence create herd immunity.
Plenty of tin foil hat opportunities here.
Plenty of tin foil hat opportunities here.
- fishfoodie
- Posts: 8221
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm
I wonder how many political prisoners volunteered for vaccine trials in China & RussiaBiffer wrote: ↑Tue Aug 11, 2020 11:52 ameah, they're still effectively having a large controlled trial, but it's pretty unethical as it doesn't involve volunteers (also doesn't cover the spread of demographics, so doesn't prove the fullrange of side effects across the population.).Raggs wrote: ↑Tue Aug 11, 2020 11:48 amI'd "rather" China's response, as it's at least still controlled. In truth, I'd rather wait until proper testing is done!Biffer wrote: ↑Tue Aug 11, 2020 11:42 am I reckon they've done phase i or phase i/ii and said that'll do. Wouldn't take that one myself.
China have done something similar in that their vaccine went through phase i/ii and then decided to go to a massive phase iii/iv within their military, skipping a normal phase iii (which is a large controlled trial of volunteers, the oxford vaccine and the US moderna vaccine are now in this phase).
Russians gambling big time here, hopefully it doesn't bite them on the arse.
- tabascoboy
- Posts: 6474
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 8:22 am
- Location: 曇りの街
I'm sure plenty of Uighurs "volunteered"fishfoodie wrote: ↑Tue Aug 11, 2020 4:43 pmI wonder how many political prisoners volunteered for vaccine trials in China & Russia
-
- Posts: 642
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 10:11 am
Russia boasts many brilliant minds, despite some of the more decadent ones being lured by dollars to American and British universities. It's no surprise that they are world leaders in creating a COVID-19 vaccine. Well done to Russia.
- fishfoodie
- Posts: 8221
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm
Certainly world leaders at creating biological weapons; & the skills are transferableLemoentjie wrote: ↑Tue Aug 11, 2020 5:03 pm Russia boasts many brilliant minds, despite some of the more decadent ones being lured by dollars to American and British universities. It's no surprise that they are world leaders in creating a COVID-19 vaccine. Well done to Russia.
The issue isn't that they've made a vaccine, it's that there hasn't been a long term safety study done. Unless they've got time travel they haven't had time to regardless of how good their scientists are.Lemoentjie wrote: ↑Tue Aug 11, 2020 5:03 pm Russia boasts many brilliant minds, despite some of the more decadent ones being lured by dollars to American and British universities. It's no surprise that they are world leaders in creating a COVID-19 vaccine. Well done to Russia.
Give a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.
- redderneck
- Posts: 252
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:45 pm
If you could just find yourself a talented illustrator to team up with, you could make an absolute killing in the cut-throat self-published fairytale sector.Lemoentjie wrote: ↑Tue Aug 11, 2020 5:03 pm Russia boasts many brilliant minds, despite some of the more decadent ones being lured by dollars to American and British universities. It's no surprise that they are world leaders in creating a COVID-19 vaccine. Well done to Russia.
You'd need one who wasn't decadent, obviously. Russia is full of such selfless altruistic idealists.
IndeedRaggs wrote: ↑Tue Aug 11, 2020 5:26 pmThe issue isn't that they've made a vaccine, it's that there hasn't been a long term safety study done. Unless they've got time travel they haven't had time to regardless of how good their scientists are.Lemoentjie wrote: ↑Tue Aug 11, 2020 5:03 pm Russia boasts many brilliant minds, despite some of the more decadent ones being lured by dollars to American and British universities. It's no surprise that they are world leaders in creating a COVID-19 vaccine. Well done to Russia.
redderneck wrote: ↑Tue Aug 11, 2020 5:28 pmIf you could just find yourself a talented illustrator to team up with, you could make an absolute killing in the cut-throat self-published fairytale sector.Lemoentjie wrote: ↑Tue Aug 11, 2020 5:03 pm Russia boasts many brilliant minds, despite some of the more decadent ones being lured by dollars to American and British universities. It's no surprise that they are world leaders in creating a COVID-19 vaccine. Well done to Russia.
You'd need one who wasn't decadent, obviously. Russia is full of such selfless altruistic idealists.
So how effective will a vaccine actually be? We have seen cases where people got the virus AGAIN after just 3 months.
Don’t think that’s necessarily real, many cases it’s probably just stayed with a victim, and don’t think any have died under that suspected bracket.
Yeah - most reported cases are where they've had a positive test months after recovering. On investigation the tests are capturing dead virus cells.
There are some cases seen where the virus has gone dormant, then remerges. This happens sometimes with other viruses, such as Chickenpox, and is pretty rare.
It's likely that's vaccine will be pretty effective. With most vaccines, the actual effect is not to stop you becoming infected - but when you catch the virus your body is far faster to respond before your system becomes overwhelmed.
So, if we vaccinated a person and that reduced their chance of dying to a tenth of what we currently think it is, we actually have turned this into flu.
Also, vaccines generally give longer immunity than natural immunity. There's a lot of talk about getting second shots / boosters for this (like tetanus and yellow fever vaccines). In the Oxford trials, people with a second vaccine shot tended to show higher levels of immune system response than those who had recovered from the disease.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
Researchers reckon there are more than one strain and the virus may have the ability to mutate. If that is the case, a vaccine may only be effective as the yearly flu vaccine which is not all that great.
It's not mutating anything like as fast as the flu and the different strains aren't so different that they require a different vaccine.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
-
- Posts: 642
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 10:11 am
Europeans and Americans wouldn't accept a Russian vaccine even if they did believe it was safe, as they see countries like Russia as being 'under' them. Same for a Chinese vaccine. Not to throw the R-word around, but it's always under the surface in this type of thing.
R for “rushed to market”Lemoentjie wrote: ↑Wed Aug 12, 2020 7:53 am Europeans and Americans wouldn't accept a Russian vaccine even if they did believe it was safe, as they see countries like Russia as being 'under' them. Same for a Chinese vaccine. Not to throw the R-word around, but it's always under the surface in this type of thing.
You could make that assumption if you want, but I would counter it is more a case of both Russia and China being dictatorships without a history of suppressing independent journalism and academia and controlling their populations with a healthy dose of propaganda and force.Lemoentjie wrote: ↑Wed Aug 12, 2020 7:53 am Europeans and Americans wouldn't accept a Russian vaccine even if they did believe it was safe, as they see countries like Russia as being 'under' them. Same for a Chinese vaccine. Not to throw the R-word around, but it's always under the surface in this type of thing.
The reality is, while the vaccines they have developed might be effective, they are taking shortcuts (some of them potentially unethical ones) and they are being very cagey in not publishing the results.
They are the types of regimes that realise that the first country that has immunity will get a massive global economic boost as well as a lot of global influence, but that will also suffer little or no political consequences for endorsing and distributing a less than safe vaccine among their own population on their road to get there.
- tabascoboy
- Posts: 6474
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 8:22 am
- Location: 曇りの街
Was going to say similar, but this is far more eloquently written!Blake wrote: ↑Wed Aug 12, 2020 8:27 amYou could make that assumption if you want, but I would counter it is more a case of both Russia and China being dictatorships without a history of suppressing independent journalism and academia and controlling their populations with a healthy dose of propaganda and force.Lemoentjie wrote: ↑Wed Aug 12, 2020 7:53 am Europeans and Americans wouldn't accept a Russian vaccine even if they did believe it was safe, as they see countries like Russia as being 'under' them. Same for a Chinese vaccine. Not to throw the R-word around, but it's always under the surface in this type of thing.
The reality is, while the vaccines they have developed might be effective, they are taking shortcuts (some of them potentially unethical ones) and they are being very cagey in not publishing the results.
They are the types of regimes that realise that the first country that has immunity will get a massive global economic boost as well as a lot of global influence, but that will also suffer little or no political consequences for endorsing and distributing a less than safe vaccine among their own population on their road to get there.
- tabascoboy
- Posts: 6474
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 8:22 am
- Location: 曇りの街
Meanwhile, depending on which source you look at anywhere between 15 - 30% of people here in the UK would refuse a vaccination and only half say they would definitely have it. Although we have a core of anti-vax "science/government is evil" the speed at which it is being done even from our own research, testing process and safety is also an issue raised.
That is certainly a point that is going to be a big problem to overcome.
That is certainly a point that is going to be a big problem to overcome.
From what I understand there are various ways in which a vaccine van target corona viruses. The one that most of the vaccines is pursuing is targeting the "spike protein" that forms the corona or "crown"...effectively putting a "cork on the needles". This will prevent the virus from attaching to the ACE2 receptors in the respiratory tract and getting a foothold. Unless the mutations occur on the spike protein, specifically changing it and the mode or transmission drastically, it should remain fairly effective. And as an additional benefit the vaccine might also be effective against the common cold and other corona virus strains that use the same spike protein.
I think the part that makes Covid-19 unique is that it also seems to be able to bind to CD147 receptors which is what is leading to bad outcomes in diabetic patients and hypertension sufferers. I suspect the hope is that herd immunity will shield the population to sufficiently limit the risk of infection, and then if infection does occur that the current treatments will be effective.
Same here in South Africa. The population is massively susceptible to conspiracy theories and propaganda.tabascoboy wrote: ↑Wed Aug 12, 2020 8:39 am Meanwhile, depending on which source you look at anywhere between 15 - 30% of people here in the UK would refuse a vaccination and only half say they would definitely have it. Although we have a core of anti-vax "science/government is evil" the speed at which it is being done even from our own research, testing process and safety is also an issue raised.
That is certainly a point that is going to be a big problem to overcome.
Our government has deep ties with both Russia and China, and also very anti-colonialist and anti-capitalist (at least in public).
So if we start with the potentially less effective or more dangerous Russian or Chinese vaccines and have bad outcomes, the anti-vax movement here will get a massive boost and the chances of people being willing to take the Oxford or any US vaccine will also go down significantly.
All the more reason for everybody to publish their results for global scientific scrutiny and to follow the proper testing protocols and phases. A botched vaccine will set us back even further in the long run.
I'd take the Russian or Chinese vaccines after seeing a proper safety trial. I wouldn't trust their results since they've already shown themselves not to be trustworthy on that front by their current actions.
Give a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.
Coronaviruses don't mutate at the same rates as flu viruses. That won't suddenly change.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
Given the alacrity with which (we are told) Russia was attempting to hack into UK universities developing vaccines, and their long history of relying on espionage rather than innovation in science and technology, part of me wonders if the Russian vaccine is in fact a modified version of the Oxford (or any other) vaccine.