Given Russia's proven, prior scientific knowledge and abilities in the space race and in other areas of modern science, I would be surprised if they wanted to "steal" anything from a developing science country like the UK.Lobby wrote: ↑Wed Aug 12, 2020 9:23 am Given the alacrity with which (we are told) Russia was attempting to hack into UK universities developing vaccines, and their long history of relying on espionage rather than innovation in science and technology, part of me wonders if the Russian vaccine is in fact a modified version of the Oxford (or any other) vaccine.
Russia registers first corona vaccine
Last edited by Amethyst on Wed Aug 12, 2020 10:03 am, edited 1 time in total.
I'm not racist for not wanting to be vaccinated with a drug that hasn't been trialled properly. Not to throw the W-word around but you can have it and face any potential consequences if you want.Lemoentjie wrote: ↑Wed Aug 12, 2020 7:53 am Europeans and Americans wouldn't accept a Russian vaccine even if they did believe it was safe, as they see countries like Russia as being 'under' them. Same for a Chinese vaccine. Not to throw the R-word around, but it's always under the surface in this type of thing.
You don't need to buy into hype to acknowledge that the UK has a tremendous university research base, one of the best in the world (only behind the USA). Where we suck ass is taking fundamental research into use in industry or wider society. The UK is pretty awful at that. Pharma is a bit of an exception though, it's one of the few areas where we regularly translate basic research into commercial use.Amethyst wrote: ↑Wed Aug 12, 2020 9:57 amGiven Russia's proven, prior scientific knowledge and abilities in the space race and in other areas of modern science, I would be surprised if they wanted to "steal" anything from a developing science country like the UK.Lobby wrote: ↑Wed Aug 12, 2020 9:23 am Given the alacrity with which (we are told) Russia was attempting to hack into UK universities developing vaccines, and their long history of relying on espionage rather than innovation in science and technology, part of me wonders if the Russian vaccine is in fact a modified version of the Oxford (or any other) vaccine.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
Russia are miles ahead mate.Biffer wrote: ↑Wed Aug 12, 2020 10:05 amYou don't need to buy into hype to acknowledge that the UK has a tremendous university research base, one of the best in the world (only behind the USA). Where we suck ass is taking fundamental research into use in industry or wider society. The UK is pretty awful at that. Pharma is a bit of an exception though, it's one of the few areas where we regularly translate basic research into commercial use.Amethyst wrote: ↑Wed Aug 12, 2020 9:57 amGiven Russia's proven, prior scientific knowledge and abilities in the space race and in other areas of modern science, I would be surprised if they wanted to "steal" anything from a developing science country like the UK.Lobby wrote: ↑Wed Aug 12, 2020 9:23 am Given the alacrity with which (we are told) Russia was attempting to hack into UK universities developing vaccines, and their long history of relying on espionage rather than innovation in science and technology, part of me wonders if the Russian vaccine is in fact a modified version of the Oxford (or any other) vaccine.
In terms of scientific ability, I would rank as follows:
1. USA
2. Russia
3. China
4. Germany
5. France
6. South Africa
20. Boris Johnson
1. USA
2. Russia
3. China
4. Germany
5. France
6. South Africa
20. Boris Johnson
You are aware that BoJo doesn't actually carry out the research himself? Or are you suggesting that Trump, Putin, and Winnie the Pooh are highly capable research scientists? Merkel I'll give you.
In the person of Elon Musk, SA will be pushing for top honours sooner rather than later. We have already surpassed developing scientific countries like the UK.
Yep. No doubt the creepy self-publicist will surpass the entire scientific output of the UK by this afternoon.
-
- Posts: 1731
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:49 pm
There are no Russian universities, only 1 German, 1 French and no SA universities in the top 100 apparently. Laughable.
- tabascoboy
- Posts: 6474
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 8:22 am
- Location: 曇りの街
Which South African university did Musk go to again?
He was only 5 months at University Pretoria, then kicked out for being to dumb to study at an SA university.
- Chrysoprase
- Posts: 255
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 4:59 am
- tabascoboy
- Posts: 6474
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 8:22 am
- Location: 曇りの街
Back on topic
And from an interview with said person:
76?! Any experts here know what is a usual sample test size? EDIT Okay, seems that's normal for Phase 2 testing...although it could also involve hundreds in some trials. Phase 3 should involve thousands.Meanwhile the Moscow-based Association of Clinical Trials Organizations (Acto), which represents the world's top drug companies in Russia, urged the health ministry to postpone approval until after phase-three trials.
Acto executive director Svetlana Zavidova told the Russian MedPortal site that a decision on mass vaccination had been carried out after combined first- and second-phase tests on 76 people, and that it was impossible to confirm the efficacy of a drug on this basis.
And from an interview with said person:
So if she's not that happy, maybe it's best to take notice?Do Russian companies adhere to the same level of standards that multinationals follow?
I am afraid that this is not always the case, unfortunately. It is not a problem of clinical trials, but rather a problem of drug registration. Currently, we have a double standard for Russian and foreign players, in terms of registration. If we compare what is necessary for a registration dossier, the requirements for Russian companies are far more lax. International companies must present the results of international trials, a plethora of statistics, and so on. Local manufacturers need only present the results of a limited number of Russian clinical trials, on a limited population set.
.
What is your final message to the international readers of Pharmaceutical Executive?
In spite of any challenges, we believe in Russia!
This. No objective metric exists that can support this claim.
Who's the troll you are referring to?Blake wrote: ↑Wed Aug 12, 2020 2:04 pmYou are such a valuable addition to the forum.
Jesus Christ, such an interesting discussion completely derailed by this troll.
I was going to say that nobody could possibly be this stupid, but then I didn't "benefit" from a South African University education.
Wow, that hurts deeply. What is your top 5 or are you too much of a softcock to give your own list instead of throwing insults (a sign of your own insecurities and maybe inferior education)?
That’s not how it works cupcake.Amethyst wrote: ↑Wed Aug 12, 2020 4:50 pmWow, that hurts deeply. What is your top 5 or are you too much of a softcock to give your own list instead of throwing insults (a sign of your own insecurities and maybe inferior education)?
You made the claim, the burden of proof is on you.
What metric did you use to compile your “list”?
Nobel Prize winners? Registered patents from research? Papers published? Research PhD students? Research grant allocations?
Come now. Time to show your work.
What value is there in me pulling a list out of my arse to compare with the list you have made up. Produce some support for your list or crawl back under your stone.Amethyst wrote: ↑Wed Aug 12, 2020 4:50 pmWow, that hurts deeply. What is your top 5 or are you too much of a softcock to give your own list instead of throwing insults (a sign of your own insecurities and maybe inferior education)?
You are just a sour puss because I didn't list the UK in the top 5. Which of those 5 top countries I've mentioned should be replaced by the UK (there, I've made it easy for you)? And name any other country that should be included in that top 5 instead, come on softcock.A6D6E6 wrote: ↑Wed Aug 12, 2020 6:09 pmWhat value is there in me pulling a list out of my arse to compare with the list you have made up. Produce some support for your list or crawl back under your stone.
I don't need to proof anything. I think it's rather a common assumption that the 5 as listed (In fact I would replace France with Japan) should be there. Can't think of any other real contenders (besides the UK which I don't think should be top 5), can you enlighten us?Blake wrote: ↑Wed Aug 12, 2020 5:22 pmThat’s not how it works cupcake.
You made the claim, the burden of proof is on you.
What metric did you use to compile your “list”?
Nobel Prize winners? Registered patents from research? Papers published? Research PhD students? Research grant allocations?
Come now. Time to show your work.
No, you’re just doubling down on offering no reasoning or evidence. Your list is bullshit and you know it, because you won’t tell us why you think that, you just want someone else to put something up so you can argue with it.Amethyst wrote: ↑Wed Aug 12, 2020 7:58 pmYou are just a sour puss because I didn't list the UK in the top 5. Which of those 5 top countries I've mentioned should be replaced by the UK (there, I've made it easy for you)? And name any other country that should be included in that top 5 instead, come on softcock.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
I stopped reading when I saw you had the not so great Britain ahead of Germany and Japan and Russia not even close. UK and France are more or less even but way behind Russia.
Again, which other countries could qualify? Making my list off as bullshit is a bit harsh, I think.Biffer wrote: ↑Wed Aug 12, 2020 8:26 pmNo, you’re just doubling down on offering no reasoning or evidence. Your list is bullshit and you know it, because you won’t tell us why you think that, you just want someone else to put something up so you can argue with it.Amethyst wrote: ↑Wed Aug 12, 2020 7:58 pmYou are just a sour puss because I didn't list the UK in the top 5. Which of those 5 top countries I've mentioned should be replaced by the UK (there, I've made it easy for you)? And name any other country that should be included in that top 5 instead, come on softcock.
Nature Index of Sciencyness:
United States of America (USA) 28722
China 19033
Germany 8959
United Kingdom (UK) 7803
Japan 5036
France 5067
Canada 3480
Switzerland 3230
South Korea 2475
Australia 3007
Spain 2808
Italy 2665
India 1602
Netherlands 2452
Sweden 1843
Singapore 1302
Israel 1301
Russia 1394
United States of America (USA) 28722
China 19033
Germany 8959
United Kingdom (UK) 7803
Japan 5036
France 5067
Canada 3480
Switzerland 3230
South Korea 2475
Australia 3007
Spain 2808
Italy 2665
India 1602
Netherlands 2452
Sweden 1843
Singapore 1302
Israel 1301
Russia 1394
Plum
Idiotic to have Russia so low down, typical westernized bullshit. PlumQuade wrote: ↑Wed Aug 12, 2020 9:00 pm Nature Index of Sciencyness:
United States of America (USA) 28722
China 19033
Germany 8959
United Kingdom (UK) 7803
Japan 5036
France 5067
Canada 3480
Switzerland 3230
South Korea 2475
Australia 3007
Spain 2808
Italy 2665
India 1602
Netherlands 2452
Sweden 1843
Singapore 1302
Israel 1301
Russia 1394
OK. So on what basis do you have them so high up?Amethyst wrote: ↑Wed Aug 12, 2020 9:10 pmIdiotic to have Russia so low down, typical westernized bullshit. PlumQuade wrote: ↑Wed Aug 12, 2020 9:00 pm Nature Index of Sciencyness:
United States of America (USA) 28722
China 19033
Germany 8959
United Kingdom (UK) 7803
Japan 5036
France 5067
Canada 3480
Switzerland 3230
South Korea 2475
Australia 3007
Spain 2808
Italy 2665
India 1602
Netherlands 2452
Sweden 1843
Singapore 1302
Israel 1301
Russia 1394
Give a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.
Give us a reason why it’s not bullshit then. Justify it.Amethyst wrote: ↑Wed Aug 12, 2020 8:35 pmAgain, which other countries could qualify? Making my list off as bullshit is a bit harsh, I think.Biffer wrote: ↑Wed Aug 12, 2020 8:26 pmNo, you’re just doubling down on offering no reasoning or evidence. Your list is bullshit and you know it, because you won’t tell us why you think that, you just want someone else to put something up so you can argue with it.Amethyst wrote: ↑Wed Aug 12, 2020 7:58 pm
You are just a sour puss because I didn't list the UK in the top 5. Which of those 5 top countries I've mentioned should be replaced by the UK (there, I've made it easy for you)? And name any other country that should be included in that top 5 instead, come on softcock.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
As predicted.Amethyst wrote: ↑Wed Aug 12, 2020 9:10 pmIdiotic to have Russia so low down, typical westernized bullshit. PlumQuade wrote: ↑Wed Aug 12, 2020 9:00 pm Nature Index of Sciencyness:
United States of America (USA) 28722
China 19033
Germany 8959
United Kingdom (UK) 7803
Japan 5036
France 5067
Canada 3480
Switzerland 3230
South Korea 2475
Australia 3007
Spain 2808
Italy 2665
India 1602
Netherlands 2452
Sweden 1843
Singapore 1302
Israel 1301
Russia 1394
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
Yet, everyone quakes in their boots at the slightest warning by the Ruskies that they are going to fuck them up with their ultra advanced warfare. The thing is nobody really knows what is going on there in Russia but everyone knows that you should not fuck with them. Laughable.
So far the best that anyone has come up with is that the UK should replace Russia in the top 5 (I disagree with that). There seems to be consensus that the other countries mentioned by me should be top of he list. So it's not a bullshit list as only the position of Russia seems to be challenged.
Last edited by Amethyst on Wed Aug 12, 2020 9:42 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Nature's opinion is a pretty strong one. Number of scientific and technical papers released is another. Noble laureates, perhaps fairer would be Laureates per capita? Every one of which places the UK above Russia I'm afraid.Amethyst wrote: ↑Wed Aug 12, 2020 9:37 pmSo far the best that anyone has come up with is that the UK should replace Russia in the top 5 (I disagree with that). There seems to be consensus that the other countries mentioned by me should be top of he list. So it's not a bullshit list as only the position of Russia seems to be
challenged in my the top 5.
You seem to have a bullshit list based on, well, the bullshit coming out of your own head. Whereas those lists would all be based on actual evidence.
Give a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.
Actual evidence of what, getting more noble laureates? Scientific papers compiled by the West. Says fuckall, laughable.Raggs wrote: ↑Wed Aug 12, 2020 9:40 pmNature's opinion is a pretty strong one. Number of scientific and technical papers released is another. Noble laureates, perhaps fairer would be Laureates per capita? Every one of which places the UK above Russia I'm afraid.Amethyst wrote: ↑Wed Aug 12, 2020 9:37 pmSo far the best that anyone has come up with is that the UK should replace Russia in the top 5 (I disagree with that). There seems to be consensus that the other countries mentioned by me should be top of he list. So it's not a bullshit list as only the position of Russia seems to be
challenged in my the top 5.
You seem to have a bullshit list based on, well, the bullshit coming out of your own head. Whereas those lists would all be based on actual evidence.