Stop voting for fucking Tories
-
- Posts: 3585
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 9:37 am
Jrm saying we have an presidential style of government is interesting. Didn't expect old moggy to be a republican, welcome comrade!
- fishfoodie
- Posts: 8222
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm
So do we believe Truss, that the Bumblecunt still hasn't sight of the report ?
I'm tending to think she's lying thru her teeth; & he's delaying, so he can get thru one more round of PMQs.
I'm tending to think she's lying thru her teeth; & he's delaying, so he can get thru one more round of PMQs.
- The sun god
- Posts: 176
- Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2020 6:40 am
- Location: It's nice in Nice.
- tabascoboy
- Posts: 6474
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 8:22 am
- Location: 曇りの街
More ammunition...
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-60143279Boris Johnson authorised Afghan animal evacuation, leaked email suggest
Boris Johnson authorised the evacuation of animals from Afghanistan during the fall of Kabul, according to emails leaked by a whistleblower. The PM has previously dismissed as "nonsense" claims he intervened in the evacuation of the Nowzad charity, run by former Royal Marine Pen Farthing.
But an email from an official in minister Zac Goldsmith's office suggests he was personally involved. It is one of a number of emails released by a select committee.
The August 2020 message to an official in the Foreign Office says: "Charity Nowzad, run by an ex-Royal Marine, has received a lot of publicity and the PM has just authorised their staff and animals to be evacuated."
When asked in December if he had prioritised animals over people in the evacuation of Kabul, Mr Johnson said: "That is complete nonsense."
Her upstairs fingerprints all over this one?tabascoboy wrote: ↑Wed Jan 26, 2022 1:33 pm More ammunition...
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-60143279Boris Johnson authorised Afghan animal evacuation, leaked email suggest
Boris Johnson authorised the evacuation of animals from Afghanistan during the fall of Kabul, according to emails leaked by a whistleblower. The PM has previously dismissed as "nonsense" claims he intervened in the evacuation of the Nowzad charity, run by former Royal Marine Pen Farthing.
But an email from an official in minister Zac Goldsmith's office suggests he was personally involved. It is one of a number of emails released by a select committee.
The August 2020 message to an official in the Foreign Office says: "Charity Nowzad, run by an ex-Royal Marine, has received a lot of publicity and the PM has just authorised their staff and animals to be evacuated."
When asked in December if he had prioritised animals over people in the evacuation of Kabul, Mr Johnson said: "That is complete nonsense."
In what sort of world could someone being investigated for a possible wrongdoing be in charge of issuing a report on it?
Some might say it’s become presidential because PMs can apppoint people like him to the Cabinet.I like neeps wrote: ↑Wed Jan 26, 2022 8:57 am Jrm saying we have an presidential style of government is interesting. Didn't expect old moggy to be a republican, welcome comrade!
- tabascoboy
- Posts: 6474
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 8:22 am
- Location: 曇りの街
The American's think he already does:tabascoboy wrote: ↑Wed Jan 26, 2022 3:41 pmSay one thing for Putin, say that he'd fit right in with this lot in charge right now
- Torquemada 1420
- Posts: 11155
- Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:22 am
- Location: Hut 8
Nothing new here. Have been posting for years that the UK is the centre for the world's largest money laundering activities.
But don't forget to take your passport with you to your bank if you want to make a significant withdrawal of your own money. Gotta
cut down on the sources of crime dontcha know.
Torquemada 1420 wrote: ↑Wed Jan 26, 2022 4:26 pmNothing new here. Have been posting for years that the UK is the centre for the world's largest money laundering activities.
But don't forget to take your passport with you to your bank if you want to make a significant withdrawal of your own money. Gotta
cut down on the sources of crime dontcha know.
If its true then the Russian are getting a really poor return for their money.
The UK is sending military aid to Ukraine as we speak while most major European nations are sitting on their hands (Germany being the worst offender in actively blocking other European nations sending their German made equipment). The RAF is flying intel missions in the Black sea almost every day and its likely our troop commitment to Eastern Europe will increase soon.
The Russians are also investing major efforts into destabilizing the UK (and thus NATO) through support of Scottish nationalism - why bother if they have compromised the government as suggested.
- Torquemada 1420
- Posts: 11155
- Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:22 am
- Location: Hut 8
I was really referring to the knowledge about the massive amounts of money being knowingly laundered via UK banks, property and football clubs.tc27 wrote: ↑Wed Jan 26, 2022 4:35 pm If its true then the Russian are getting a really poor return for their money.
The UK is sending military aid to Ukraine as we speak while most major European nations are sitting on their hands (Germany being the worst offender in actively blocking other European nations sending their German made equipment). The RAF is flying intel missions in the Black sea almost every day and its likely our troop commitment to Eastern Europe will increase soon.
The Russians are also investing major efforts into destabilizing the UK (and thus NATO) through support of Scottish nationalism - why bother if they have compromised the government as suggested.
Doubt the Russians bat an eyelid at some UK military posturing. Putin has murdered people on UK soil and basically said "WTF are you going to do about it?". And, of course, the answer was nothing.
-
- Posts: 3585
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 9:37 am
Any evidence in their support of Scottish independence movements? I remember the evidence of them funding brexit was limited at best.tc27 wrote: ↑Wed Jan 26, 2022 4:35 pmTorquemada 1420 wrote: ↑Wed Jan 26, 2022 4:26 pmNothing new here. Have been posting for years that the UK is the centre for the world's largest money laundering activities.
But don't forget to take your passport with you to your bank if you want to make a significant withdrawal of your own money. Gotta
cut down on the sources of crime dontcha know.
If its true then the Russian are getting a really poor return for their money.
The UK is sending military aid to Ukraine as we speak while most major European nations are sitting on their hands (Germany being the worst offender in actively blocking other European nations sending their German made equipment). The RAF is flying intel missions in the Black sea almost every day and its likely our troop commitment to Eastern Europe will increase soon.
The Russians are also investing major efforts into destabilizing the UK (and thus NATO) through support of Scottish nationalism - why bother if they have compromised the government as suggested.
- Paddington Bear
- Posts: 5961
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:29 pm
- Location: Hertfordshire
I think there is a tendency that's fashionable to understate British capabilities if we decide to use them. Not just military hard power where us and the French are way above the other European democracies but I'm particularly thinking around the cyber space where if so inclined we could give the Russians plenty to worry about.Torquemada 1420 wrote: ↑Wed Jan 26, 2022 4:53 pmI was really referring to the knowledge about the massive amounts of money being knowingly laundered via UK banks, property and football clubs.tc27 wrote: ↑Wed Jan 26, 2022 4:35 pm If its true then the Russian are getting a really poor return for their money.
The UK is sending military aid to Ukraine as we speak while most major European nations are sitting on their hands (Germany being the worst offender in actively blocking other European nations sending their German made equipment). The RAF is flying intel missions in the Black sea almost every day and its likely our troop commitment to Eastern Europe will increase soon.
The Russians are also investing major efforts into destabilizing the UK (and thus NATO) through support of Scottish nationalism - why bother if they have compromised the government as suggested.
Doubt the Russians bat an eyelid at some UK military posturing. Putin has murdered people on UK soil and basically said "WTF are you going to do about it?". And, of course, the answer was nothing.
Old men forget: yet all shall be forgot, But he'll remember with advantages, What feats he did that day
They trial ran some of their techniques online for Scottish independence. I had some stupid brexitty (older and all male) friends who shared a lot of bullshit and befriended a lot of attractive you females (who then tried to befriend me) who had no history, no friends their own age but loved to spam brexitty propaganda relentlessly from surprisingly early in the morning. At the time I couldn't believe any one would fall for it, now I realise how stupid a lot of predominantly older people are on Facebook. Facebook cleaned house when the cadwalder story came out.I like neeps wrote: ↑Wed Jan 26, 2022 4:53 pmAny evidence in their support of Scottish independence movements? I remember the evidence of them funding brexit was limited at best.tc27 wrote: ↑Wed Jan 26, 2022 4:35 pmTorquemada 1420 wrote: ↑Wed Jan 26, 2022 4:26 pm
Nothing new here. Have been posting for years that the UK is the centre for the world's largest money laundering activities.
But don't forget to take your passport with you to your bank if you want to make a significant withdrawal of your own money. Gotta
cut down on the sources of crime dontcha know.
If its true then the Russian are getting a really poor return for their money.
The UK is sending military aid to Ukraine as we speak while most major European nations are sitting on their hands (Germany being the worst offender in actively blocking other European nations sending their German made equipment). The RAF is flying intel missions in the Black sea almost every day and its likely our troop commitment to Eastern Europe will increase soon.
The Russians are also investing major efforts into destabilizing the UK (and thus NATO) through support of Scottish nationalism - why bother if they have compromised the government as suggested.
Everyone likes to look for direct links but all the Russians need to do is indirectly help a useless UK or American bullshitter and leave them to it. The Tory Party of course accepts money from some very dubious individuals. They are no longer the party of British business.
- fishfoodie
- Posts: 8222
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm
Peston tweeted this morning; to the effect that the Report is done; & the delay is now completely down to the Cabinet Office (i.e. the PM), in a stand off with Gray, over his commitment to publish the full report .... turns out he was lying then too .... imagine that ?
- tabascoboy
- Posts: 6474
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 8:22 am
- Location: 曇りの街
Ah but that's the scum media and lefty woke libtard types all stirring up something out of nothing and having no sense of proportion distracting the government at this time of multiple crisis, Boris is doing a fantastic job and is the right man to lead our country. The real threat is Jeremy Corbyn! Or something.
- PlanetGlyndwr
- Posts: 93
- Joined: Mon Oct 12, 2020 3:18 pm
Boris could of strapped Captain Tom onto the back of a rocket and fired him straight into the sun and he still would have kept his job. CMV
I’d like to think that he’s in a heads we win, tails he loses situation. How could he credibly justify not releasing it? Any security stuff or names could be redacted.fishfoodie wrote: ↑Wed Jan 26, 2022 5:29 pmPeston tweeted this morning; to the effect that the Report is done; & the delay is now completely down to the Cabinet Office (i.e. the PM), in a stand off with Gray, over his commitment to publish the full report .... turns out he was lying then too .... imagine that ?
I'm assuming it will be leaked regardless.GogLais wrote: ↑Wed Jan 26, 2022 5:49 pmI’d like to think that he’s in a heads we win, tails he loses situation. How could he credibly justify not releasing it? Any security stuff or names could be redacted.fishfoodie wrote: ↑Wed Jan 26, 2022 5:29 pmPeston tweeted this morning; to the effect that the Report is done; & the delay is now completely down to the Cabinet Office (i.e. the PM), in a stand off with Gray, over his commitment to publish the full report .... turns out he was lying then too .... imagine that ?
- fishfoodie
- Posts: 8222
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm
Back to Pre-Partygate Tory scummer.....
To any of you UK, Dual Citizens eligible, thinking that you were still UK Citizens; because the Rozzers hadn't kicked in your door, & thrown you on a flight to antarctica .... Think again !
To any of you UK, Dual Citizens eligible, thinking that you were still UK Citizens; because the Rozzers hadn't kicked in your door, & thrown you on a flight to antarctica .... Think again !
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/h ... 00956.htmlHome Office loses case over stripping citizenship without notice after challenge by alleged Isis member
The Home Office has lost the latest stage of a court battle over stripping people of their British citizenship.
The Court of Appeal found it was unlawful to remove people’s nationality without giving proper notice, after a challenge by a woman who allegedly joined Isis in Syria.
The woman, who can only be identified as D4, is being held in the same Syrian camp as Shamima Begum and did not find out her British citizenship had been removed for 10 months.
....
In December that year, a minister removed her UK citizenship but she was not formally informed until October 2020, after her solicitors asked the government to repatriate her and were refused.
D4 then appealed to the Special Immigration Appeals Commission and started judicial review proceedings in the High Court.
The law states that the government “must give the person written notice” of a citizenship deprivation decision, providing reasons for it and notifying them of their right to appeal.
In 2018, the Home Office changed regulations setting out how notice can be given if someone's whereabouts are unknown, there is no address to send documents to and they do not have a lawyer.
Under the new rules, notice of a decision to revoke someone's citizenship was “deemed to have been given” to the person in question if the Home Office made a record of it and put it on their file.
Giving his judgment at the High Court last year, Mr Justice Chamberlain remarked: “As a matter of ordinary language, you do not ‘give’ someone ‘notice’ of something by putting the notice in your desk drawer and locking it. No-one who understands English would regard that purely private act as a way of ‘giving notice’.”
- fishfoodie
- Posts: 8222
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm
Sean Whelan, RTE's London Correspondent, seems to have good sources on this.
https://www.rte.ie/news/2022/0126/12760 ... -analysis/Westminster is still waiting for Sue Gray's report.
The senior civil servant investigating Partygate is said to be going through her finished document with the metropolitan police, lawyers and Civil Service Human Resources officials, to remove elements that could be problematic for junior staff, the security of government buildings, or a police investigation.
The Prime Minster, Boris Johnson, has promised to publish the report once he receives it from Sue Gray, and will make a statement to the House of Commons.
But the Commons has adjourned for the night, so there is no forum available for the PM to make his statement - until tomorrow.
When the adjournment debate began at 4pm, the deputy speaker said that if Downing Street requested it, the house would pause its adjournment debate and wait until the PM was ready to make a statement.
But that didn't happen, and by 4.45pm, the adjournment question was put, wrapping up business for the day.
Now speculation continues about when Sue Gray will report to her boss - the person who commissioned the report into the goings on in Number 10 - the Prime Minster, Boris Johnson. He will then determine the release of the report.
He is expected to take a few hours (at least) to read the report and prepare his own defences, prior to making a statement. The opposition parties also expect some time to consult the report before the PM's statement.
That suggests tomorrow morning as the earliest time for a Commons statement - assuming Sue Gray delivers her report tonight. If she hands over the report in the morning, then an afternoon statement is more likely.
After that, the question is will enough Conservative MPs regard the content of Sue Gray's report as sufficient cover for them to submit letters to the backbench 1922 Committee, calling for a no-confidence vote in the leader.
If the threshold is reached - 15% of Conservative MPs, equivalent to 54 members - then the vote would happen quite quickly, possibly the day after the prime minister's statement.
Two potential problems with Thursday as a publication day.
Firstly, that would point to a possible vote on Friday, when many members are usually gone from Westminster back to their constituencies, and may not want to stay on.
Second, Thursday is Holocaust Memorial Day, and traditionally the British government does not bring out new policies or statements on that day, so as not to distract from the solemnity of the occasion.
But so far in this 'Partygate/Sue Gray' affair, nothing has gone according to convention, tradition or timetable - so anything is possible.
Torquemada 1420 wrote: ↑Wed Jan 26, 2022 4:53 pmI was really referring to the knowledge about the massive amounts of money being knowingly laundered via UK banks, property and football clubs.tc27 wrote: ↑Wed Jan 26, 2022 4:35 pm If its true then the Russian are getting a really poor return for their money.
The UK is sending military aid to Ukraine as we speak while most major European nations are sitting on their hands (Germany being the worst offender in actively blocking other European nations sending their German made equipment). The RAF is flying intel missions in the Black sea almost every day and its likely our troop commitment to Eastern Europe will increase soon.
The Russians are also investing major efforts into destabilizing the UK (and thus NATO) through support of Scottish nationalism - why bother if they have compromised the government as suggested.
Doubt the Russians bat an eyelid at some UK military posturing. Putin has murdered people on UK soil and basically said "WTF are you going to do about it?". And, of course, the answer was nothing.
This is just an awful take - basic ignorance combined with Putin wanking...are you sure your not under the control of the Russians?
-
- Posts: 792
- Joined: Tue Jul 28, 2020 12:09 pm
If priti gets her way with the legislation that allows her to strip British nationality from people who are eligible for another passport when they get convicted of an offence, will that mean if boris does eventually get convicted of something, she'll send him back to America
Putin murdering people on UK soil backfired badly and got a united response. Putin tends to go for those who are russian ex-pats to probably keep them in-line.tc27 wrote: ↑Wed Jan 26, 2022 9:14 pmTorquemada 1420 wrote: ↑Wed Jan 26, 2022 4:53 pmI was really referring to the knowledge about the massive amounts of money being knowingly laundered via UK banks, property and football clubs.tc27 wrote: ↑Wed Jan 26, 2022 4:35 pm If its true then the Russian are getting a really poor return for their money.
The UK is sending military aid to Ukraine as we speak while most major European nations are sitting on their hands (Germany being the worst offender in actively blocking other European nations sending their German made equipment). The RAF is flying intel missions in the Black sea almost every day and its likely our troop commitment to Eastern Europe will increase soon.
The Russians are also investing major efforts into destabilizing the UK (and thus NATO) through support of Scottish nationalism - why bother if they have compromised the government as suggested.
Doubt the Russians bat an eyelid at some UK military posturing. Putin has murdered people on UK soil and basically said "WTF are you going to do about it?". And, of course, the answer was nothing.
This is just an awful take - basic ignorance combined with Putin wanking...are you sure your not under the control of the Russians?
-
- Posts: 792
- Joined: Tue Jul 28, 2020 12:09 pm
It appears that ms truss' recent jaunt down under was on a private plane costing £500k
- Torquemada 1420
- Posts: 11155
- Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:22 am
- Location: Hut 8
How did it backfire? He sent a message to all his own "dissidents" saying "Toe the line or we will kill you. Anywhere. And no-one will lift a finger."
Tell me that's not how it played out.
- Torquemada 1420
- Posts: 11155
- Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:22 am
- Location: Hut 8
Ahhhh, but will we see forced confessions? Stay away from stray dustbin lids would be my advice.sturginho wrote: ↑Thu Jan 27, 2022 12:09 pm They're a canny bunch the Met police.....
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/202 ... are-guilty
That was clearly the case tbh.Torquemada 1420 wrote: ↑Thu Jan 27, 2022 12:39 pmHow did it backfire? He sent a message to all his own "dissidents" saying "Toe the line or we will kill you. Anywhere. And no-one will lift a finger."
Tell me that's not how it played out.
Putin came out much stronger
Just struck me, presumably any guilty revellers will have to declare it on insurance or job application forms. Or not?sturginho wrote: ↑Thu Jan 27, 2022 12:09 pm They're a canny bunch the Met police.....
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/202 ... are-guilty
Thing was he wasn’t just a dissident. I forget the details and I’m too idle to check but he was in the category of “You leave ours alone and we’ll leave yours alone”. The Russian actions in Salisbury broke that tacit agreement.Torquemada 1420 wrote: ↑Thu Jan 27, 2022 12:39 pmHow did it backfire? He sent a message to all his own "dissidents" saying "Toe the line or we will kill you. Anywhere. And no-one will lift a finger."
Tell me that's not how it played out.
- Torquemada 1420
- Posts: 11155
- Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:22 am
- Location: Hut 8
Wasn't Skripal a defector? And so the message here was clear enough?GogLais wrote: ↑Thu Jan 27, 2022 1:02 pmThing was he wasn’t just a dissident. I forget the details and I’m too idle to check but he was in the category of “You leave ours alone and we’ll leave yours alone”. The Russian actions in Salisbury broke that tacit agreement.Torquemada 1420 wrote: ↑Thu Jan 27, 2022 12:39 pmHow did it backfire? He sent a message to all his own "dissidents" saying "Toe the line or we will kill you. Anywhere. And no-one will lift a finger."
Tell me that's not how it played out.
Didn';t want to travel with the general public in case they overheard the simpering cowHappyhooker wrote: ↑Thu Jan 27, 2022 12:26 pm It appears that ms truss' recent jaunt down under was on a private plane costing £500k
The Independent reports “it is understood the private flight was chosen for ‘security considerations’ amid fears that conversations could be overheard by other passengers”.
- tabascoboy
- Posts: 6474
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 8:22 am
- Location: 曇りの街
Can't risk those secret details on cheese negotiations leaking to Joe PublkicSaintK wrote: ↑Thu Jan 27, 2022 3:20 pmDidn';t want to travel with the general public in case they overheard the simpering cowHappyhooker wrote: ↑Thu Jan 27, 2022 12:26 pm It appears that ms truss' recent jaunt down under was on a private plane costing £500kThe Independent reports “it is understood the private flight was chosen for ‘security considerations’ amid fears that conversations could be overheard by other passengers”.
- Insane_Homer
- Posts: 5389
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:14 pm
- Location: Leafy Surrey
“Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true.”