So, coronavirus...

Where goats go to escape
User avatar
mat the expat
Posts: 1573
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 11:12 pm

I had Moderna last month

It done fucked me up good :spin
User avatar
Kiwias
Posts: 7559
Joined: Sat Jul 04, 2020 1:44 am

mat the expat wrote: Tue Feb 01, 2022 4:18 am I had Moderna last month

It done fucked me up good :spin
I read your experience and said a little thank you to my GP for choosing Pfizer.
Dinsdale Piranha
Posts: 1032
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 10:08 pm

Kiwias wrote: Tue Feb 01, 2022 4:53 am
mat the expat wrote: Tue Feb 01, 2022 4:18 am I had Moderna last month

It done fucked me up good :spin
I read your experience and said a little thank you to my GP for choosing Pfizer.
IIRC Moderna is a bigger dose than Pfizer which may be why it kicks some people harder. The mRNA component is identical in both.

I've had 2 AZ and a Pfizer, I vaguely noticed the first one, didn't notice the 2nd and 3rd.
User avatar
Torquemada 1420
Posts: 12069
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:22 am
Location: Hut 8

Guy Smiley wrote: Mon Jan 31, 2022 10:12 pm I'm struggling to understand your position.

On one hand you profess distrust for Young's motivations in giving up (in his own estimation) 60% of his streaming income for a moral stand, the sort of thing he's done all his career.

On the other hand, you seem to have no problem at all with the stance of the company who are prepared to shell out $100 million to host a controversial podcaster whose presented material has been shown to be misleading at best and generally dishonest.

Pardon my cynicsm here but you strike me as just another corporate favouring conservative who hates hippies, as evidenced in your automatic categorising of Young.
I have no strong position in regards Spotify. It is what it is, just like Faece-book etc. i.e. massive media companies without ethics....... because that's how they make money. Whilst I dislike/hold contempt for such businesses, I can't affect them and so can't be arsed getting worked up over their existences. Frankly, they only exist because of the co-operation of their users. In the case of Spotify, users also include the very same artists who are making money and then (in some cases) subsequently posturing in regards their own payer's dubious ethics. IIRC, Young removed his works from Spotify and then reinstated them.

Tell me, do you use Spotify?
User avatar
Torquemada 1420
Posts: 12069
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:22 am
Location: Hut 8

Tichtheid wrote: Mon Jan 31, 2022 10:34 pm I have a steaming service (Apple), and I've used Tidal and Spotify in the past, but I use it as "try before you buy" service. You used to be able to go into a record shop and ask the guy (it was always a guy) behind the counter to put on an album and you'd listen to several tracks before deciding if you wanted to buy it or not.

As someone said online earlier, it's not sustainable or ethical to have the entire history of recorded music at your disposal for £10 per month.
This is also why live concert tickets are so expensive now, there is practically no living to be made with the months, sometimes years of work that goes into an album.
Would you work for three grand per million uses of your work as per that stupid Guardian article? What if that material represents months, years of work?
I don't actually believe the return is as much as that, btw.

Buy CDs, vinyl, Bandcamp is best.
100% all of this ^^^^^^
dpedin
Posts: 3433
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:35 am

Guy Smiley wrote: Mon Jan 31, 2022 10:12 pm
Torquemada 1420 wrote: Mon Jan 31, 2022 9:55 pm
Guy Smiley wrote: Mon Jan 31, 2022 9:43 pm

FFS Torq...

both of them belong to that generation of musicians who were known for their social activism. It's been almost a mainstay of theirs.

Your cynicsm is just your default setting.
Yup. I definitely reach for the misanthrope lenses whenever I see a privileged person apparently moral crusading.

This is a balanced article
https://www.theguardian.com/music/2022/ ... nformation
I'm struggling to understand your position.

On one hand you profess distrust for Young's motivations in giving up (in his own estimation) 60% of his streaming income for a moral stand, the sort of thing he's done all his career.

On the other hand, you seem to have no problem at all with the stance of the company who are prepared to shell out $100 million to host a controversial podcaster whose presented material has been shown to be misleading at best and generally dishonest.

Pardon my cynicsm here but you strike me as just another corporate favouring conservative who hates hippies, as evidenced in your automatic categorising of Young.
Both Young and Mitchell are in their late 70's. I suspect they have enough money to let them live life as they want till they pop off this world. I struggle to see either of them trying to use their Spotify actions as some sort of self serving commercial action or a means to boost their popularity amongst their own audiences, most of whom will probably be older than them and still own the music as LPs! I suspect they are at an age where they don't give a shit about what people think of them, they probably never did, or their own motivations and will do what they think is right and proper based on their moral stances reflecting their own personal life experiences. Good luck to them and I am pleased they took the actions they did, if nothing else it raised the issue and debate to a wider audience.
dpedin
Posts: 3433
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:35 am

Kiwias wrote: Tue Feb 01, 2022 2:11 am On a personal note, I am booked for my 3rd shot of Pfizer in 10 days.
Excellent news! Stay safe in interim.
User avatar
Kiwias
Posts: 7559
Joined: Sat Jul 04, 2020 1:44 am

dpedin wrote: Tue Feb 01, 2022 11:37 am
Kiwias wrote: Tue Feb 01, 2022 2:11 am On a personal note, I am booked for my 3rd shot of Pfizer in 10 days.
Excellent news! Stay safe in interim.
Shall do.
User avatar
Niegs
Posts: 3745
Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2020 3:20 pm

Not directly related, but maybe you've heard of this convoy of 'truckers' (i.e. smaller percentage of truckers, larger percentage of anti-vaxxers/anti-mandates types in their various non-big rig vehicles, a few have displayed swastikas and white supremacist attitudes) in Canada protesting around the country?

They've been camped in Ottawa since Saturday, I think, making a nuisance of themselves. I did enjoy this update:

Image
troglodiet
Posts: 401
Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2020 7:12 pm
Location: South Africa

Torquemada 1420 wrote: Mon Jan 31, 2022 9:34 pm
dpedin wrote: Mon Jan 31, 2022 9:06 pm However I still suspect that for Mitchell and Young their experiences of contracting polio, a disease now largely disappeared due to vaccination, was a driver for their objections to the anti vaccine messages being on Spotify and as a result they pulled their music. For me it is nothing other than them both doing what they think is right.
You may be right. I'm just deeply cynical about musicians when they start making statements which scream "Look at my virtuosity". Something about them as a group that makes them especially notorious for it.


Look a bit deeper into Young's recent actions and another picture is emerging.

He sold most of the rights to his music recently to a company with some very dodgy connections - dodgier than anybody saying they got cured from Covid using medically prescribed Ivermectin.
User avatar
Calculon
Posts: 1853
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:25 pm

troglodiet wrote: Wed Feb 02, 2022 7:09 am
Torquemada 1420 wrote: Mon Jan 31, 2022 9:34 pm
dpedin wrote: Mon Jan 31, 2022 9:06 pm However I still suspect that for Mitchell and Young their experiences of contracting polio, a disease now largely disappeared due to vaccination, was a driver for their objections to the anti vaccine messages being on Spotify and as a result they pulled their music. For me it is nothing other than them both doing what they think is right.
You may be right. I'm just deeply cynical about musicians when they start making statements which scream "Look at my virtuosity". Something about them as a group that makes them especially notorious for it.


Look a bit deeper into Young's recent actions and another picture is emerging.

He sold most of the rights to his music recently to a company with some very dodgy connections - dodgier than anybody saying they got cured from Covid using medically prescribed Ivermectin.
Why don't you give us a link then?
Slick
Posts: 13664
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:58 pm

He sold 50% of his rights with a specific clause that his songs should never be used in advertisements for fast food or unhealthy fizzy drinks.

Sounds like a monster
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
dpedin
Posts: 3433
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:35 am

Niegs wrote: Wed Feb 02, 2022 5:40 am Not directly related, but maybe you've heard of this convoy of 'truckers' (i.e. smaller percentage of truckers, larger percentage of anti-vaxxers/anti-mandates types in their various non-big rig vehicles, a few have displayed swastikas and white supremacist attitudes) in Canada protesting around the country?

They've been camped in Ottawa since Saturday, I think, making a nuisance of themselves. I did enjoy this update:

Image
Brilliant but will fly over the heads of the truckers and their mates!
User avatar
mat the expat
Posts: 1573
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 11:12 pm

dpedin wrote: Wed Feb 02, 2022 10:07 am
Niegs wrote: Wed Feb 02, 2022 5:40 am Not directly related, but maybe you've heard of this convoy of 'truckers' (i.e. smaller percentage of truckers, larger percentage of anti-vaxxers/anti-mandates types in their various non-big rig vehicles, a few have displayed swastikas and white supremacist attitudes) in Canada protesting around the country?

They've been camped in Ottawa since Saturday, I think, making a nuisance of themselves. I did enjoy this update:

Image
Brilliant but will fly over the heads of the truckers and their mates!
That's good!

Their nickname is also good:

https://twitter.com/FluTruxKlan
User avatar
Niegs
Posts: 3745
Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2020 3:20 pm

mat the expat wrote: Wed Feb 02, 2022 11:58 am
dpedin wrote: Wed Feb 02, 2022 10:07 am
Niegs wrote: Wed Feb 02, 2022 5:40 am Not directly related, but maybe you've heard of this convoy of 'truckers' (i.e. smaller percentage of truckers, larger percentage of anti-vaxxers/anti-mandates types in their various non-big rig vehicles, a few have displayed swastikas and white supremacist attitudes) in Canada protesting around the country?

They've been camped in Ottawa since Saturday, I think, making a nuisance of themselves. I did enjoy this update:

Image
Brilliant but will fly over the heads of the truckers and their mates!
That's good!

Their nickname is also good:

https://twitter.com/FluTruxKlan
In addition to that and Karen Convoy, I've heard "Omicronvoy"
troglodiet
Posts: 401
Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2020 7:12 pm
Location: South Africa

Calculon wrote: Wed Feb 02, 2022 7:21 am
troglodiet wrote: Wed Feb 02, 2022 7:09 am
Torquemada 1420 wrote: Mon Jan 31, 2022 9:34 pm
You may be right. I'm just deeply cynical about musicians when they start making statements which scream "Look at my virtuosity". Something about them as a group that makes them especially notorious for it.


Look a bit deeper into Young's recent actions and another picture is emerging.

He sold most of the rights to his music recently to a company with some very dodgy connections - dodgier than anybody saying they got cured from Covid using medically prescribed Ivermectin.
Why don't you give us a link then?

https://youtu.be/dTn9cHGPmUw




But I bet the person giving the data will be attacked, not the message.



I love how it's "the good guys" wanting to censor everybody. That used to be the sole domain of the right. Now the ones against censorship are the Nazis. Apparently.

The truck drivers are against mandates. Why they should be equated to Nazis for this is a good question.

And what exactly did Joe Rogan say that should cause him to be de-platformed? Having a different opinion to the norm? There is a massive difference between disinfo and difference of opinion.

Or is it because he has guests with opinions from all sides of the spectrum?

Or the fact that he says he managed to shake off C19 on his own, using medicines that apparently doesn't do anything, according to no studies? Medicine decried to him by a doctor btw.



The biggest problem as I see it, is that the woke C19 thing was politicised. The minute that happened, everybody got fucked in some way by some lying POS politician.
User avatar
Margin__Walker
Posts: 2823
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 5:47 am

troglodiet wrote: Wed Feb 02, 2022 4:07 pm

https://youtu.be/dTn9cHGPmUw




But I bet the person giving the data will be attacked, not the message.



I love how it's "the good guys" wanting to censor everybody. That used to be the sole domain of the right. Now the ones against censorship are the Nazis. Apparently.

The truck drivers are against mandates. Why they should be equated to Nazis for this is a good question.

And what exactly did Joe Rogan say that should cause him to be de-platformed? Having a different opinion to the norm? There is a massive difference between disinfo and difference of opinion.

Or is it because he has guests with opinions from all sides of the spectrum?

Or the fact that he says he managed to shake off C19 on his own, using medicines that apparently doesn't do anything, according to no studies? Medicine decried to him by a doctor btw.



The biggest problem as I see it, is that the woke C19 thing was politicised. The minute that happened, everybody got fucked in some way by some lying POS politician.
:lol:

I managed to shake off Covid without any medicine FFS. He would have too, as the vast majority of people do
User avatar
Guy Smiley
Posts: 6845
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:52 pm

Torquemada 1420 wrote: Tue Feb 01, 2022 9:48 am
Guy Smiley wrote: Mon Jan 31, 2022 10:12 pm I'm struggling to understand your position.

On one hand you profess distrust for Young's motivations in giving up (in his own estimation) 60% of his streaming income for a moral stand, the sort of thing he's done all his career.

On the other hand, you seem to have no problem at all with the stance of the company who are prepared to shell out $100 million to host a controversial podcaster whose presented material has been shown to be misleading at best and generally dishonest.

Pardon my cynicsm here but you strike me as just another corporate favouring conservative who hates hippies, as evidenced in your automatic categorising of Young.
I have no strong position in regards Spotify. It is what it is, just like Faece-book etc. i.e. massive media companies without ethics....... because that's how they make money. Whilst I dislike/hold contempt for such businesses, I can't affect them and so can't be arsed getting worked up over their existences. Frankly, they only exist because of the co-operation of their users. In the case of Spotify, users also include the very same artists who are making money and then (in some cases) subsequently posturing in regards their own payer's dubious ethics. IIRC, Young removed his works from Spotify and then reinstated them.

Tell me, do you use Spotify?

Ok... so big corporates are what they are and that's fine but cyncism over the perceived motivations of two musos, unsupported by any factual evidence, is fair and reasonable.

Gotcha.
troglodiet
Posts: 401
Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2020 7:12 pm
Location: South Africa

Margin__Walker wrote: Wed Feb 02, 2022 4:10 pm

I managed to shake off Covid without any medicine FFS. He would have too, as the vast majority of people do
Depending on who you ask, that post falls nicely into the "misinfo" category too.

The official right answer is that you MUST consult a doctor, who will advise you how and with what to treat the disease, based on the severity of your illness, your medical history, and other factors such as co-morbidities.

If you were Jimmy Dore, Joe Rogan, Russell Brand, Dave Rubin or a million other content creators, you could easily have been accused of misinformation, as some idiots may think you're advising against any medical intervention.

It's a fine line between opinion and disinformation these days.
User avatar
Margin__Walker
Posts: 2823
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 5:47 am

troglodiet wrote: Wed Feb 02, 2022 5:06 pm
Margin__Walker wrote: Wed Feb 02, 2022 4:10 pm

I managed to shake off Covid without any medicine FFS. He would have too, as the vast majority of people do
Depending on who you ask, that post falls nicely into the "misinfo" category too.

The official right answer is that you MUST consult a doctor, who will advise you how and with what to treat the disease, based on the severity of your illness, your medical history, and other factors such as co-morbidities.

If you were Jimmy Dore, Joe Rogan, Russell Brand, Dave Rubin or a million other content creators, you could easily have been accused of misinformation, as some idiots may think you're advising against any medical intervention.

It's a fine line between opinion and disinformation these days.
UK link for that?

Thought not. More misinfo
robmatic
Posts: 2364
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 7:46 am

troglodiet wrote: Wed Feb 02, 2022 4:07 pm
The truck drivers are against mandates. Why they should be equated to Nazis for this is a good question.
Think they're mostly getting equated with Nazis because some of them are white nationalists prancing around with swastikas.
troglodiet
Posts: 401
Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2020 7:12 pm
Location: South Africa

Margin__Walker wrote: Wed Feb 02, 2022 5:08 pm

UK link for that?

Thought not. More misinfo


I'm not in or from the UK so wouldn't know.

That in itself proves how impossible it is to really define misinfo.

Hence the caveat: "depending on who you ask"
Last edited by troglodiet on Wed Feb 02, 2022 5:30 pm, edited 2 times in total.
troglodiet
Posts: 401
Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2020 7:12 pm
Location: South Africa

robmatic wrote: Wed Feb 02, 2022 5:24 pm
troglodiet wrote: Wed Feb 02, 2022 4:07 pm
The truck drivers are against mandates. Why they should be equated to Nazis for this is a good question.
Think they're mostly getting equated with Nazis because some of them are white nationalists prancing around with swastikas.
So some are Nazis, fair enough.

Does that make all of them Nazis then?
User avatar
Margin__Walker
Posts: 2823
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 5:47 am

troglodiet wrote: Wed Feb 02, 2022 5:27 pm
Margin__Walker wrote: Wed Feb 02, 2022 5:08 pm

UK link for that?

Thought not. More misinfo


I'm not in or from the UK so wouldn't know.

That in itself proves how impossible it is to really define misinfo.

Hence the caveat: "depending on who you ask"
You're the one talking about official right answers chief.
User avatar
JM2K6
Posts: 10127
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2020 10:43 am

Christ. More conspiracy theorists.
robmatic
Posts: 2364
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 7:46 am

troglodiet wrote: Wed Feb 02, 2022 5:29 pm
robmatic wrote: Wed Feb 02, 2022 5:24 pm
troglodiet wrote: Wed Feb 02, 2022 4:07 pm
The truck drivers are against mandates. Why they should be equated to Nazis for this is a good question.
Think they're mostly getting equated with Nazis because some of them are white nationalists prancing around with swastikas.
So some are Nazis, fair enough.

Does that make all of them Nazis then?
Well, it makes the rest of them people who are happy to pal around with Nazis.
User avatar
Snooze
Posts: 147
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:19 pm
Location: Vancouver

troglodiet wrote: Wed Feb 02, 2022 4:07 pm
And what exactly did Joe Rogan say that should cause him to be de-platformed? Having a different opinion to the norm? There is a massive difference between disinfo and difference of opinion.
https://www.bbc.com/news/60199614

Just for starters. Misinformation would be the nicest term you could use. Lies and conspiracy theories is another.
Happyhooker
Posts: 796
Joined: Tue Jul 28, 2020 12:09 pm

troglodiet wrote: Wed Feb 02, 2022 5:29 pm
robmatic wrote: Wed Feb 02, 2022 5:24 pm
troglodiet wrote: Wed Feb 02, 2022 4:07 pm
The truck drivers are against mandates. Why they should be equated to Nazis for this is a good question.
Think they're mostly getting equated with Nazis because some of them are white nationalists prancing around with swastikas.
So some are Nazis, fair enough.

Does that make all of them Nazis then?
If you hang around with nazis, don't be surprised if you get called a nazi.
User avatar
Torquemada 1420
Posts: 12069
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:22 am
Location: Hut 8

Guy Smiley wrote: Wed Feb 02, 2022 4:57 pm
Torquemada 1420 wrote: Tue Feb 01, 2022 9:48 am
Guy Smiley wrote: Mon Jan 31, 2022 10:12 pm I'm struggling to understand your position.

On one hand you profess distrust for Young's motivations in giving up (in his own estimation) 60% of his streaming income for a moral stand, the sort of thing he's done all his career.

On the other hand, you seem to have no problem at all with the stance of the company who are prepared to shell out $100 million to host a controversial podcaster whose presented material has been shown to be misleading at best and generally dishonest.

Pardon my cynicsm here but you strike me as just another corporate favouring conservative who hates hippies, as evidenced in your automatic categorising of Young.
I have no strong position in regards Spotify. It is what it is, just like Faece-book etc. i.e. massive media companies without ethics....... because that's how they make money. Whilst I dislike/hold contempt for such businesses, I can't affect them and so can't be arsed getting worked up over their existences. Frankly, they only exist because of the co-operation of their users. In the case of Spotify, users also include the very same artists who are making money and then (in some cases) subsequently posturing in regards their own payer's dubious ethics. IIRC, Young removed his works from Spotify and then reinstated them.

Tell me, do you use Spotify?

Ok... so big corporates are what they are and that's fine but cyncism over the perceived motivations of two musos, unsupported by any factual evidence, is fair and reasonable.

Gotcha.
Sorry. Was that "you do use Spotify" or "you don't use Spotify"?
sockwithaticket
Posts: 9381
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 11:48 am

I always had trog pegged as a fairly sensible bloke over on the other bored. This page has been a bit of a shock.
User avatar
CM11
Posts: 981
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 8:24 am

troglodiet wrote: Wed Feb 02, 2022 5:06 pm
Margin__Walker wrote: Wed Feb 02, 2022 4:10 pm

I managed to shake off Covid without any medicine FFS. He would have too, as the vast majority of people do
Depending on who you ask, that post falls nicely into the "misinfo" category too.

The official right answer is that you MUST consult a doctor, who will advise you how and with what to treat the disease, based on the severity of your illness, your medical history, and other factors such as co-morbidities.

If you were Jimmy Dore, Joe Rogan, Russell Brand, Dave Rubin or a million other content creators, you could easily have been accused of misinformation, as some idiots may think you're advising against any medical intervention.

It's a fine line between opinion and disinformation these days.
I'm trying to figure out if you're being satirical or are actually serious? I don't have a handle on your covid persona.
User avatar
Torquemada 1420
Posts: 12069
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:22 am
Location: Hut 8

Snooze wrote: Wed Feb 02, 2022 5:48 pm
troglodiet wrote: Wed Feb 02, 2022 4:07 pm
And what exactly did Joe Rogan say that should cause him to be de-platformed? Having a different opinion to the norm? There is a massive difference between disinfo and difference of opinion.
https://www.bbc.com/news/60199614

Just for starters. Misinformation would be the nicest term you could use. Lies and conspiracy theories is another.
He has a point. If the President of the US tells 350m subjects to inject bleach and is not "deplatformed", why should anyone else be?
User avatar
Snooze
Posts: 147
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:19 pm
Location: Vancouver

Torquemada 1420 wrote: Wed Feb 02, 2022 9:15 pm
Snooze wrote: Wed Feb 02, 2022 5:48 pm
troglodiet wrote: Wed Feb 02, 2022 4:07 pm
And what exactly did Joe Rogan say that should cause him to be de-platformed? Having a different opinion to the norm? There is a massive difference between disinfo and difference of opinion.
https://www.bbc.com/news/60199614

Just for starters. Misinformation would be the nicest term you could use. Lies and conspiracy theories is another.
He has a point. If the President of the US tells 350m subjects to inject bleach and is not "deplatformed", why should anyone else be?
OK. :bimbo:
User avatar
JM2K6
Posts: 10127
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2020 10:43 am

CM11 wrote: Wed Feb 02, 2022 9:14 pm
troglodiet wrote: Wed Feb 02, 2022 5:06 pm
Margin__Walker wrote: Wed Feb 02, 2022 4:10 pm

I managed to shake off Covid without any medicine FFS. He would have too, as the vast majority of people do
Depending on who you ask, that post falls nicely into the "misinfo" category too.

The official right answer is that you MUST consult a doctor, who will advise you how and with what to treat the disease, based on the severity of your illness, your medical history, and other factors such as co-morbidities.

If you were Jimmy Dore, Joe Rogan, Russell Brand, Dave Rubin or a million other content creators, you could easily have been accused of misinformation, as some idiots may think you're advising against any medical intervention.

It's a fine line between opinion and disinformation these days.
I'm trying to figure out if you're being satirical or are actually serious? I don't have a handle on your covid persona.
He believes this shit.
Glaston
Posts: 484
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 8:35 am

Snooze wrote: Wed Feb 02, 2022 5:48 pm
troglodiet wrote: Wed Feb 02, 2022 4:07 pm
And what exactly did Joe Rogan say that should cause him to be de-platformed? Having a different opinion to the norm? There is a massive difference between disinfo and difference of opinion.
https://www.bbc.com/news/60199614

Just for starters. Misinformation would be the nicest term you could use. Lies and conspiracy theories is another.
And who checks the "Fact checkers" at the BBC?
They have biases too and are not 100% accurate themselves.
User avatar
Guy Smiley
Posts: 6845
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:52 pm

Torquemada 1420 wrote: Wed Feb 02, 2022 9:11 pm
Guy Smiley wrote: Wed Feb 02, 2022 4:57 pm
Torquemada 1420 wrote: Tue Feb 01, 2022 9:48 am
I have no strong position in regards Spotify. It is what it is, just like Faece-book etc. i.e. massive media companies without ethics....... because that's how they make money. Whilst I dislike/hold contempt for such businesses, I can't affect them and so can't be arsed getting worked up over their existences. Frankly, they only exist because of the co-operation of their users. In the case of Spotify, users also include the very same artists who are making money and then (in some cases) subsequently posturing in regards their own payer's dubious ethics. IIRC, Young removed his works from Spotify and then reinstated them.

Tell me, do you use Spotify?

Ok... so big corporates are what they are and that's fine but cyncism over the perceived motivations of two musos, unsupported by any factual evidence, is fair and reasonable.

Gotcha.
Sorry. Was that "you do use Spotify" or "you don't use Spotify"?
My individual habits involving the use of any of the web based conglomerates is entirely irrelevant to this discussion and your attempts to head off down that alley suggest your argument is in bad faith.

I just found it interesting that you'd express such disdain for the two musos and specifically suggest their motives were less than honest. You started off slurring their characters, with no real basis to it other than your feelings.

We've progressed far enough with this to see it won't go anywhere. I've no real judgement on any of it... your tastes are your own.

It's been an illuminating interlude. Keep on rockin' in the free world.
User avatar
Torquemada 1420
Posts: 12069
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:22 am
Location: Hut 8

Guy Smiley wrote: Thu Feb 03, 2022 7:18 am
Torquemada 1420 wrote: Wed Feb 02, 2022 9:11 pm
Guy Smiley wrote: Wed Feb 02, 2022 4:57 pm


Ok... so big corporates are what they are and that's fine but cyncism over the perceived motivations of two musos, unsupported by any factual evidence, is fair and reasonable.

Gotcha.
Sorry. Was that "you do use Spotify" or "you don't use Spotify"?
My individual habits involving the use of any of the web based conglomerates is entirely irrelevant to this discussion and your attempts to head off down that alley suggest your argument is in bad faith.

I just found it interesting that you'd express such disdain for the two musos and specifically suggest their motives were less than honest. You started off slurring their characters, with no real basis to it other than your feelings.

We've progressed far enough with this to see it won't go anywhere. I've no real judgement on any of it... your tastes are your own.

It's been an illuminating interlude. Keep on rockin' in the free world.
So that's a yes then?
troglodiet
Posts: 401
Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2020 7:12 pm
Location: South Africa

CM11 wrote: Wed Feb 02, 2022 9:14 pm I don't have a handle on your covid persona.
Finally somebody actually asks the right question.

The short answer is: I don't really hold specific views on the disease. I have been double-vaccinated, I wear a mask in places I have to (but I tend to avoid these places so not really an issue).

I am no medical doctor, I have no medical background, I did not even have Biology at school. If it comes to uninformed, I'm that person.

What I do feel strongly about, is the right of people to give their opinions, even if it differs from mine. In fact, I prefer to hear different opinions - a good argument can change my mind, or reinforce my own ideas.

I don't like the fact that the views of those who don't follow the official narrative, are labelled misinformation, or conspiracies. Who says the official narrative is true? Top medical professionals disagree, so how can a Facebook fact-checker decide what is and what's not misinformation? Not too long ago, even alluding that the virus escaped from the Wuhan lab turned you into a conspiracy theorist and you'd get banned from Facebook, Twitter, Youtube and others. Now it's the accepted theory. So were all those saying it definitely absolutely did not escape from teh Wuhan lab also guilty of misinformation?

And my main point: I am against censorship. Why do they want to deplatform or "cancel" people the whole time? I'm sure Young's music can co-exist with Rogan's podcast on the same platform? Hell, instead of this ultimatum, why didn't they have a nice chat like the ones Rogan have with people from all over the spectrum?

Welcome to the Free censored world eh?
Biffer
Posts: 10269
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 6:43 pm

troglodiet wrote: Thu Feb 03, 2022 10:39 am
CM11 wrote: Wed Feb 02, 2022 9:14 pm I don't have a handle on your covid persona.
Finally somebody actually asks the right question.

The short answer is: I don't really hold specific views on the disease. I have been double-vaccinated, I wear a mask in places I have to (but I tend to avoid these places so not really an issue).

I am no medical doctor, I have no medical background, I did not even have Biology at school. If it comes to uninformed, I'm that person.

What I do feel strongly about, is the right of people to give their opinions, even if it differs from mine. In fact, I prefer to hear different opinions - a good argument can change my mind, or reinforce my own ideas.

I don't like the fact that the views of those who don't follow the official narrative, are labelled misinformation, or conspiracies. Who says the official narrative is true? Top medical professionals disagree, so how can a Facebook fact-checker decide what is and what's not misinformation? Not too long ago, even alluding that the virus escaped from the Wuhan lab turned you into a conspiracy theorist and you'd get banned from Facebook, Twitter, Youtube and others. Now it's the accepted theory. So were all those saying it definitely absolutely did not escape from teh Wuhan lab also guilty of misinformation?

And my main point: I am against censorship. Why do they want to deplatform or "cancel" people the whole time? I'm sure Young's music can co-exist with Rogan's podcast on the same platform? Hell, instead of this ultimatum, why didn't they have a nice chat like the ones Rogan have with people from all over the spectrum?

Welcome to the Free censored world eh?
Since when is the lab escape theory broadly accepted?

It's not. And this is why people are viewing you and your posting as suspicious on the topic - you've just stated as fact, that it's the accepted theory that it escaped from a lab. That's fundamentally not true. It's not the accepted theory - the broadly accepted theory is that it was an animal spillover. That's the viewpoint of the overwhelming majority of medical researchers, virologists and organisations. And pointing at one or two people who say otherwise doesn't change the fact that the broadly accepted view is that it came from human animal interaction.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
sockwithaticket
Posts: 9381
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 11:48 am

Opinion - Ben Youngs being in a position to overtake Jason Leonard as England's most capped international is a travesty.

Misinformation - Ivermectin is a valid treatment option for covid 19.


The problem with saying all views are valid and should be given the option to air is that the provenance of the individual and their information is often not provided to help the public effectively weigh up who and what they're listening to.

Platforming some views actively contributes to situations that negatively affect society as a whole.

There are so many heartbreaking accounts from medical staff of the abuse they experience from anit-vaxxers while simply attempting to treat them and then the fear and desperation that sets in with these people as it becomes clear that they're going to die. Rogan and his band of contrarians empower the self-harm of these people and place medical staff at risk. Airing their views is not harmless and they don't deserve to be treated with kid gloves.
Post Reply