The Official Scottish Rugby Thread

Where goats go to escape
User avatar
Yr Alban
Posts: 2013
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:10 pm
Location: Gogledd Cymru

Slick wrote: Fri Mar 04, 2022 9:26 pm It does make me wonder if a lot of these young guys coming through, who have grown up in a period of relative success for Scottish rugby, maybe don’t have the same inferiority/mental blocks that previous generations have
Oh please, please let it be so. I’ve posted many times that I think most of our problems are mental ones.
It is in truth not for glory, nor riches, nor honours that we are fighting, but for freedom - for that alone, which no honest man gives up but with life itself.
User avatar
Tichtheid
Posts: 9400
Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2020 11:18 am

Big D wrote: Fri Mar 04, 2022 10:05 pm
Tichtheid wrote: Fri Mar 04, 2022 9:43 pm Shite, I've just realised that I forgot to record that game.
On again at 4am.
Cool

I'll stay on the beer till then and get the bacon rolls on the go at about twenty to.


(30 years ago I would have done this, in company)
Biffer
Posts: 9141
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 6:43 pm

Cracking win and a good atmosphere in the stadium. First 25 was just awful, but it seemed like someone flicked a switch and then boom! From that point on, Kinghorn excellent, as was Boyle, Dean looked really good, Boffelli and Moyano really good signings, Immelmann’s best game. Glen Young worth a mention too, imposing, physical, very good indeed. Great result against a Connacht side that wasn’t weakened that much by the 6 nations.

Also, Boffelli is a tremendous goal kicker. 8 from 8 last night and some of them were not easy.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
weegie01
Posts: 1003
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 10:34 pm

I was not sure if I'd make the 4 hour round trip, but decided late on to do so. After 20 mins I'd wished I had not. Then the sun came out.

Nothing to say about the game as it has all been covered other than I'd have given Muncaster MotM, and I thought that Kinghorn had a bit of a curate's egg of a game. Some good stuff, but also passes going to ground etc. He is looking more assured at 10 but is still a work in progress.

I thought it was pretty poor that neither the stadium or TV commentators realised Moyano and Bofelli had switched numbers till Bofelli lined up a kick at goal.

6,000 plus crowd again. The move to the Dam has been completely vindicated by the crowds (the rugby has helped). Last night should fill a few more seats.
User avatar
Yr Alban
Posts: 2013
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:10 pm
Location: Gogledd Cymru

I’m actually quite pleased that Embra started slowly and had to come from behind. Most of the time, if you post a score like that, it suggests the opposition were poor. The way this panned out says more about Embra being good than anything else.

6k is a damn good crowd. They have needed a home for so bloody long.
It is in truth not for glory, nor riches, nor honours that we are fighting, but for freedom - for that alone, which no honest man gives up but with life itself.
User avatar
Margin__Walker
Posts: 2744
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 5:47 am

Duhan red card for Worcester against LI.

Carrying the ball and a forearm fend on Rowe to the face
Biffer
Posts: 9141
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 6:43 pm

Margin__Walker wrote: Sat Mar 05, 2022 4:13 pm Duhan red card for Worcester against LI.

Carrying the ball and a forearm fend on Rowe to the face
Probably out of the Italy and Ireland games then.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
User avatar
Margin__Walker
Posts: 2744
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 5:47 am

Biffer wrote: Sat Mar 05, 2022 4:22 pm
Margin__Walker wrote: Sat Mar 05, 2022 4:13 pm Duhan red card for Worcester against LI.

Carrying the ball and a forearm fend on Rowe to the face
Probably out of the Italy and Ireland games then.
Yeah, probably. Was softish, but letter of the law and all that. Don't seem it being overturned.
KingBlairhorn
Posts: 1856
Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2020 9:53 am

The Glasgow front five looks weak to me as a unit, with only Kebble really good enough for the position he’s playing IMO. Berghan is a good player but miles out of form, Matthews and McDonald I just don’t rate at all and Harley I’m not a fan of at lock. I worry for the warriors here.
Slick
Posts: 11913
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:58 pm

Biffer wrote: Sat Mar 05, 2022 4:22 pm
Margin__Walker wrote: Sat Mar 05, 2022 4:13 pm Duhan red card for Worcester against LI.

Carrying the ball and a forearm fend on Rowe to the face
Probably out of the Italy and Ireland games then.
We have lost a phenomenal number of players this 6N
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
KingBlairhorn
Posts: 1856
Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2020 9:53 am

This is descending into one of those games where nothing goes right for Glasgow. Every bit of momentum ends with a stupid mistake or penalty.

I’m still not convinced by Danny Wilson.
Big D
Posts: 3927
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2020 11:55 am

Margin__Walker wrote: Sat Mar 05, 2022 4:13 pm Duhan red card for Worcester against LI.

Carrying the ball and a forearm fend on Rowe to the face
On the Glasgow game the player jumped/hopped into a Glasgow players head/face. Nothing given.
Big D
Posts: 3927
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2020 11:55 am



I think that's harsh, it is a mistimed genuine attempt at a hand off. Probably technically a red but a likely 3 week ban for that? We need to bring back "sending off sufficient" as a punishment.
charltom
Posts: 715
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 11:43 pm

What elbow?
User avatar
Tichtheid
Posts: 9400
Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2020 11:18 am

That isn't a red card in my book, what a fucking shambles we are in when a shoulder charge to the head from a lock forward on a prone player in a ruck sends him flying backwards and gets ignored, whereas that soft part of the palm contacting the face is deemed a sending off offence.

There is no chance that the LI player is going to be hurt by that, zero.

If that results in a ban they can fuck the fuck off.
Big D
Posts: 3927
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2020 11:55 am

The contact is with the forearm:
User avatar
Tichtheid
Posts: 9400
Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2020 11:18 am

I can't in all honesty say that looks dangerous and could hurt the tackler, not any more than a straight arm hand off full in the face, which is perfectly legal.

I don't think there is a possibility in the laws for it to be reduced to zero weeks ban is there?
Big D
Posts: 3927
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2020 11:55 am

Tichtheid wrote: Sat Mar 05, 2022 11:49 pm I can't in all honesty say that looks dangerous and could hurt the tackler, not any more than a straight arm hand off full in the face, which is perfectly legal.

I don't think there is a possibility in the laws for it to be reduced to zero weeks ban is there?
Not at the moment. Would need it rescinded.

Kinghorn to wing and use two playmakers?
Slick
Posts: 11913
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:58 pm

Tichtheid wrote: Sat Mar 05, 2022 11:23 pm That isn't a red card in my book, what a fucking shambles we are in when a shoulder charge to the head from a lock forward on a prone player in a ruck sends him flying backwards and gets ignored, whereas that soft part of the palm contacting the face is deemed a sending off offence.

There is no chance that the LI player is going to be hurt by that, zero.

If that results in a ban they can fuck the fuck off.
100%

I’m not not in the “rugby has gone soft” camp by any means when it comes to head injuries. But, it’s rugby FFS, that’s just an incident
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
User avatar
Yr Alban
Posts: 2013
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:10 pm
Location: Gogledd Cymru

I think head injuries in rugby are a really important issue, and I think it’s vital the game takes them seriously. I also have a professional interest in the area. I still think that’s never a red card in a month of Sundays. It’s an attempted fend. A bit of a clumsy one to be sure, but if that gets you a red card now, it’s time to ban them altogether.
It is in truth not for glory, nor riches, nor honours that we are fighting, but for freedom - for that alone, which no honest man gives up but with life itself.
I like neeps
Posts: 3585
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 9:37 am

Tichtheid wrote: Fri Mar 04, 2022 9:35 pm
Big D wrote: Fri Mar 04, 2022 9:34 pm Forgot to add. Rudi is not a small teenager.

Beast.

With a full beard at 18.
Surely he isn't still at school? There's no way Merchiston are allowing a pupil to have a full beard?

Him and Muncaster are two of the more exciting prospects we've had at 8.

Also Glen Young has been very good - he can't be far away from a Scotland squad!
I like neeps
Posts: 3585
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 9:37 am

Judging by his Instagram Adam Hastings has been called up to Scotland.
Big D
Posts: 3927
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2020 11:55 am

Rudi Brown is Edinburghs 3rd youngest debutant.
User avatar
Tichtheid
Posts: 9400
Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2020 11:18 am

I like neeps wrote: Sun Mar 06, 2022 2:03 pm Judging by his Instagram Adam Hastings has been called up to Scotland.

With Duhan likely to miss the remaining games I expect Kinghorn will start on the wing, Hastings as cover for Finn
robmatic
Posts: 2094
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 7:46 am

Yr Alban wrote: Sat Mar 05, 2022 2:07 pm
6k is a damn good crowd. They have needed a home for so bloody long.
Don't think they ever got anywhere near that kind of attendance against Connacht in the big stadium.
Scottish Caley Fan
Posts: 13
Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2022 1:05 am

Will we see another winger called up or will the messiah go with what he's got :)?

When is the squad update anyway, wasn't it the Monday the last time?

I really hope Kyle Rowe gets a go but I may have to wait until July for that :( lol
mos_eisely_
Posts: 184
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:51 am

Scottish Caley Fan wrote: Mon Mar 07, 2022 12:01 am Will we see another winger called up or will the messiah go with what he's got :)?

When is the squad update anyway, wasn't it the Monday the last time?

I really hope Kyle Rowe gets a go but I may have to wait until July for that :( lol
Would be especially ironic given it was Rowe Dugan was attempting to fend off
KingBlairhorn
Posts: 1856
Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2020 9:53 am

I’d be surprised if Toonie doesn’t take the opportunity to try someone other than Kinghorn for Italy. Rowe is a good bet, as is Mclean (injured?) or Steyn. Forbes might also be an outside bet as might Maitland or McGuigan.

Toonie will have had this game penned in for significant Kinghorn gametime at 10 you would think, it would seem a lost opportunity on two fronts to play him at wing. We have lots of options at wing including SQ players I haven’t mentioned, if Kinghorn is genuinely a 10 it makes no sense to play him elsewhere.
User avatar
Tichtheid
Posts: 9400
Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2020 11:18 am

KingBlairhorn wrote: Mon Mar 07, 2022 8:10 am I’d be surprised if Toonie doesn’t take the opportunity to try someone other than Kinghorn for Italy. Rowe is a good bet, as is Mclean (injured?) or Steyn. Forbes might also be an outside bet as might Maitland or McGuigan.

Toonie will have had this game penned in for significant Kinghorn gametime at 10 you would think, it would seem a lost opportunity on two fronts to play him at wing. We have lots of options at wing including SQ players I haven’t mentioned, if Kinghorn is genuinely a 10 it makes no sense to play him elsewhere.

I think that's a fair point so I'll change my mind, Toonie has said that he expects Kinghorn to cover elsewhere, but the does need to be ready to start at international level if he is going to be ready for the World Cup, and as has been said, we do have options for the wing position.
KingBlairhorn
Posts: 1856
Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2020 9:53 am

Tichtheid wrote: Mon Mar 07, 2022 9:01 am
KingBlairhorn wrote: Mon Mar 07, 2022 8:10 am I’d be surprised if Toonie doesn’t take the opportunity to try someone other than Kinghorn for Italy. Rowe is a good bet, as is Mclean (injured?) or Steyn. Forbes might also be an outside bet as might Maitland or McGuigan.

Toonie will have had this game penned in for significant Kinghorn gametime at 10 you would think, it would seem a lost opportunity on two fronts to play him at wing. We have lots of options at wing including SQ players I haven’t mentioned, if Kinghorn is genuinely a 10 it makes no sense to play him elsewhere.

I think that's a fair point so I'll change my mind, Toonie has said that he expects Kinghorn to cover elsewhere, but the does need to be ready to start at international level if he is going to be ready for the World Cup, and as has been said, we do have options for the wing position.
It's quite likely that Toonie will play him at wing which is poor management IMO. It cuts down his experience at 10 and it represents a missed opportunity to have another wing increase their experience/challenge the incumbents. I totally get what Toonie is trying to do with Kinghorn - if he can turn him into a competent or better international in 3+ positions he becomes utterly priceless from a WC squad perspective, I just don't see how playing him at wing in this game aids that particular goal.
I like neeps
Posts: 3585
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 9:37 am

Scotland will have a 35 man squad, a week between all the group games and a 2 hour flight for replacements. We can and should just play our first 15 every week so not sure how valuable positional flexibility actually is. I can see the appeal of a 6/2 split and Kinghorn basically covering every backline spot but South Africa and Ireland will want us to take them on up front because they win that so not sure it's the best idea.
KingBlairhorn
Posts: 1856
Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2020 9:53 am

I like neeps wrote: Mon Mar 07, 2022 10:40 am Scotland will have a 35 man squad, a week between all the group games and a 2 hour flight for replacements. We can and should just play our first 15 every week so not sure how valuable positional flexibility actually is. I can see the appeal of a 6/2 split and Kinghorn basically covering every backline spot but South Africa and Ireland will want us to take them on up front because they win that so not sure it's the best idea.
You've answered your own question there :lol:
Big D
Posts: 3927
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2020 11:55 am

KingBlairhorn wrote: Mon Mar 07, 2022 10:30 am
Tichtheid wrote: Mon Mar 07, 2022 9:01 am
KingBlairhorn wrote: Mon Mar 07, 2022 8:10 am I’d be surprised if Toonie doesn’t take the opportunity to try someone other than Kinghorn for Italy. Rowe is a good bet, as is Mclean (injured?) or Steyn. Forbes might also be an outside bet as might Maitland or McGuigan.

Toonie will have had this game penned in for significant Kinghorn gametime at 10 you would think, it would seem a lost opportunity on two fronts to play him at wing. We have lots of options at wing including SQ players I haven’t mentioned, if Kinghorn is genuinely a 10 it makes no sense to play him elsewhere.

I think that's a fair point so I'll change my mind, Toonie has said that he expects Kinghorn to cover elsewhere, but the does need to be ready to start at international level if he is going to be ready for the World Cup, and as has been said, we do have options for the wing position.
It's quite likely that Toonie will play him at wing which is poor management IMO. It cuts down his experience at 10 and it represents a missed opportunity to have another wing increase their experience/challenge the incumbents. I totally get what Toonie is trying to do with Kinghorn - if he can turn him into a competent or better international in 3+ positions he becomes utterly priceless from a WC squad perspective, I just don't see how playing him at wing in this game aids that particular goal.
I am not sure it is poor management though. The current 10/12/13 combination have played 2 games together, one of those has 3 caps and looks average at that level so adding Kinghorn at 10 with Tuipolotu at 12 is a bit of a gamble. This game is a must win really otherwise the 6N has been a shambles and it will be a 3rd very poor away loss on Townsends record (Fiji and USA).

There are a lot of unavailable players for the wings; McLean and Smith are injured as is McGuigan but he's not in the squad. Maitland is now an emergency option really too given his age. That leaves Rowe and Steyn. From the limited games I have seen him in Rowe hasn't been as prominent recently.

The coaches believe that Kinghorn is the best or one of their best defensive players on the wing and he can cover 10 from there if need be and Steyn can bench. If the Lions are given the summer off, there will be tests in Argentina to start.
I like neeps
Posts: 3585
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 9:37 am

KingBlairhorn wrote: Mon Mar 07, 2022 11:15 am
I like neeps wrote: Mon Mar 07, 2022 10:40 am Scotland will have a 35 man squad, a week between all the group games and a 2 hour flight for replacements. We can and should just play our first 15 every week so not sure how valuable positional flexibility actually is. I can see the appeal of a 6/2 split and Kinghorn basically covering every backline spot but South Africa and Ireland will want us to take them on up front because they win that so not sure it's the best idea.
You've answered your own question there :lol:
But that's not limited to the RWC where as said positional flexibility is much less important as we have a week between games and a larger squad. Positional flexibility is far less important in this world cup than previous cups because of those changes.
Biffer
Posts: 9141
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 6:43 pm

Not rugby, but it’s always good to see the regular ‘Andy Murray is a top bloke example number 1635278’ story in the news.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
Big D
Posts: 3927
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2020 11:55 am

Thistle suggesting Fagerson, Russell and Johnson at 8, 10 and 12.
Big D
Posts: 3927
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2020 11:55 am

Biffer wrote: Tue Mar 08, 2022 5:54 pm Not rugby, but it’s always good to see the regular ‘Andy Murray is a top bloke example number 1635278’ story in the news.
Pity he isn't winning much... I jest , great gesture.
Slick
Posts: 11913
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:58 pm

Big D wrote: Tue Mar 08, 2022 8:24 pm Thistle suggesting Fagerson, Russell and Johnson at 8, 10 and 12.
A game too late, but good.

I know Fagerson was injured
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
User avatar
Yr Alban
Posts: 2013
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:10 pm
Location: Gogledd Cymru

Thistle Pod on Twitter saying that Duhan has copped a 3w ban and misses the rest of the 6N. Which makes me doubt anyone on the citing panel actually watched the incident.
It is in truth not for glory, nor riches, nor honours that we are fighting, but for freedom - for that alone, which no honest man gives up but with life itself.
KingBlairhorn
Posts: 1856
Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2020 9:53 am

Yr Alban wrote: Tue Mar 08, 2022 9:18 pm Thistle Pod on Twitter saying that Duhan has copped a 3w ban and misses the rest of the 6N. Which makes me doubt anyone on the citing panel actually watched the incident.
The notion that a red card has to come with a ban perhaps should be challenged. I can get on board with the idea it’s a red card if the impact is he misses the rest of the game he was playing in, and if it’s a serious incident there will be further punishment. The current system treats wildly different incidents more or less from the same starting point which seems wrong.

For the record I don’t have any particular issue with it being a red. Whilst the incident was tame, it’s easy to argue that it was clumsy and it was obviously direct contact to the face. If you don’t want a card, don’t do it. Equally, it’s difficult to argue the sanction for the incident should be the same as for Haouas punching Richie, for instance.
Post Reply