Stop voting for fucking Tories

Where goats go to escape
User avatar
Insane_Homer
Posts: 5389
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:14 pm
Location: Leafy Surrey

“Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true.”
User avatar
Paddington Bear
Posts: 5963
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:29 pm
Location: Hertfordshire

Just had a local councillor knock on the door. Pretty much verbatim:
'I understand your issues with Boris, but all that happens if you vote with him in mind next week is I lose and [local policies here] don't happen. He'll be gone before the next election anyway'. She went on to say I should write to our MP about him.

It's interesting how polished the delivery was of this, she'd clearly used it a lot in a pretty solid Tory constituency. Says a lot about what will is being fed back to the parliamentary party, could be interesting if they get a shooing next week.
Old men forget: yet all shall be forgot, But he'll remember with advantages, What feats he did that day
User avatar
Margin__Walker
Posts: 2744
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 5:47 am

It's stories like this that make my head spin sometimes.

As if you would sit in that environment watching porn. It's so weird, but then I guess politics attracts weird people.

User avatar
Paddington Bear
Posts: 5963
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:29 pm
Location: Hertfordshire

Margin__Walker wrote: Wed Apr 27, 2022 11:41 am It's so weird, but then I guess politics attracts weird people.
Yep. You've got to be not entirely normal to want to go through the process of even getting selected. Still find it bizarre given how many decent councillors I've met that more of them aren't persuaded to stand over the clowns that are.
Old men forget: yet all shall be forgot, But he'll remember with advantages, What feats he did that day
User avatar
tabascoboy
Posts: 6474
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 8:22 am
Location: 曇りの街

Image
User avatar
SaintK
Posts: 6624
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 7:49 am
Location: Over there somewhere

tabascoboy wrote: Wed Apr 27, 2022 11:46 am Image
Good for him!!!
Bet that gets the vein on Dominic Raab's forehead throbbing faster than usual!!!!
Biffer
Posts: 9142
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 6:43 pm

Paddington Bear wrote: Wed Apr 27, 2022 11:10 am Just had a local councillor knock on the door. Pretty much verbatim:
'I understand your issues with Boris, but all that happens if you vote with him in mind next week is I lose and [local policies here] don't happen. He'll be gone before the next election anyway'. She went on to say I should write to our MP about him.

It's interesting how polished the delivery was of this, she'd clearly used it a lot in a pretty solid Tory constituency. Says a lot about what will is being fed back to the parliamentary party, could be interesting if they get a shooing next week.
The answer to that is 'that's all very well, but I can't vote for a party that was stupid enough to put a lying charlatan in that position. What guarantee can you give me that the next person you vote for, without my input will be any better?'
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
User avatar
C69
Posts: 3338
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:42 pm

For the first time in decades I am going to vote at the local elections.
Last edited by C69 on Wed Apr 27, 2022 1:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.
I like neeps
Posts: 3586
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 9:37 am

Margin__Walker wrote: Wed Apr 27, 2022 11:41 am It's stories like this that make my head spin sometimes.

As if you would sit in that environment watching porn. It's so weird, but then I guess politics attracts weird people.

Isabel Hardman's book why we get the wrong politicians is well worth a read.
User avatar
Paddington Bear
Posts: 5963
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:29 pm
Location: Hertfordshire

Biffer wrote: Wed Apr 27, 2022 12:02 pm
Paddington Bear wrote: Wed Apr 27, 2022 11:10 am Just had a local councillor knock on the door. Pretty much verbatim:
'I understand your issues with Boris, but all that happens if you vote with him in mind next week is I lose and [local policies here] don't happen. He'll be gone before the next election anyway'. She went on to say I should write to our MP about him.

It's interesting how polished the delivery was of this, she'd clearly used it a lot in a pretty solid Tory constituency. Says a lot about what will is being fed back to the parliamentary party, could be interesting if they get a shooing next week.
The answer to that is 'that's all very well, but I can't vote for a party that was stupid enough to put a lying charlatan in that position. What guarantee can you give me that the next person you vote for, without my input will be any better?'
Tbh she left fairly mystified when I mentioned I supported HS2 and opposed free parking on the high street, which seems to be an unusual combo round here.
Old men forget: yet all shall be forgot, But he'll remember with advantages, What feats he did that day
User avatar
PCPhil
Posts: 2422
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 10:06 am
Location: Where rivers meet

Clearly not wanting anyone to be named. Anyone have any idea of which departmental backbenchers would be most horrified at someone watching porn whilst meant to be working?
“It was a pet, not an animal. It had a name, you don't eat things with names, this is horrific!”
User avatar
Margin__Walker
Posts: 2744
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 5:47 am

PCPhil wrote: Wed Apr 27, 2022 1:14 pm Clearly not wanting anyone to be named. Anyone have any idea of which departmental backbenchers would be most horrified at someone watching porn whilst meant to be working?
At least the work shy civil servants JRM is after watch their porn at home tbf.
User avatar
Paddington Bear
Posts: 5963
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:29 pm
Location: Hertfordshire

tabascoboy wrote: Wed Apr 27, 2022 11:46 am Image
'the Lib Dems are more effective NIMBYs than the Tories' is not news to anyone who has been paying attention
Old men forget: yet all shall be forgot, But he'll remember with advantages, What feats he did that day
User avatar
C69
Posts: 3338
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:42 pm

Tory MPs now watching porn in the HOC.

:lol:
User avatar
fishfoodie
Posts: 8223
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm

C69 wrote: Wed Apr 27, 2022 1:56 pm Tory MPs now watching porn in the HOC.

:lol:
not just any old MP, but variously described as Senior, & Frontbench, by the papers, & the Whip was supposed to have been shocked.
I like neeps
Posts: 3586
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 9:37 am



The Government's social mobility in schools advisor is just a ridiculous human being. This wildly sexist and factually inaccurate claim is actually one of her more least mental opinions.
User avatar
Hal Jordan
Posts: 4154
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 12:48 pm
Location: Sector 2814

fishfoodie wrote: Wed Apr 27, 2022 3:03 pm
C69 wrote: Wed Apr 27, 2022 1:56 pm Tory MPs now watching porn in the HOC.

:lol:
not just any old MP, but variously described as Senior, & Frontbench, by the papers, & the Whip was supposed to have been shocked.
Dear God, please let it be Rees-Mogg.
User avatar
SaintK
Posts: 6624
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 7:49 am
Location: Over there somewhere

I like neeps wrote: Wed Apr 27, 2022 4:04 pm

The Government's social mobility in schools advisor is just a ridiculous human being. This wildly sexist and factually inaccurate claim is actually one of her more least mental opinions.
She's a fucking dangerous loon!!!
Dame Athene Donald, a professor of experimental physics and master of Churchill College, Cambridge, said the comments were “terrifying” and “quite damaging” and questioned to which research Birbalsingh was referring in suggesting that girls had an intrinsic lack of appetite for maths and physics.

“It’s not a case of campaigning for more girls to do physics, it’s a case of making sure that girls aren’t discouraged by remarks like this,” Donald said. “We want girls to be free to pursue what they’re good at and, equally, boys should also be able to go into professions like nursing. We aren’t in a society like that.”
https://www.theguardian.com/education ... ity-head
User avatar
PCPhil
Posts: 2422
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 10:06 am
Location: Where rivers meet

Hal Jordan wrote: Wed Apr 27, 2022 4:45 pm
fishfoodie wrote: Wed Apr 27, 2022 3:03 pm
C69 wrote: Wed Apr 27, 2022 1:56 pm Tory MPs now watching porn in the HOC.

:lol:
not just any old MP, but variously described as Senior, & Frontbench, by the papers, & the Whip was supposed to have been shocked.
Dear God, please let it be Rees-Mogg.
I raise you, Gove.

Any other players?
“It was a pet, not an animal. It had a name, you don't eat things with names, this is horrific!”
Biffer
Posts: 9142
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 6:43 pm

PCPhil wrote: Wed Apr 27, 2022 6:33 pm
Hal Jordan wrote: Wed Apr 27, 2022 4:45 pm
fishfoodie wrote: Wed Apr 27, 2022 3:03 pm

not just any old MP, but variously described as Senior, & Frontbench, by the papers, & the Whip was supposed to have been shocked.
Dear God, please let it be Rees-Mogg.
I raise you, Gove.

Any other players?
Ben Wallace.

That's where my money would be

It's not going to be Rees Mogg. His idea of sex is his wife delicately lifting her petticoats and lying back to think of England. He then has twenty seconds of light movement before exploding and immediately prays for forgiveness. The cunt.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
User avatar
PCPhil
Posts: 2422
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 10:06 am
Location: Where rivers meet

Ah, but the game is who you would want it to be.

However I will research your right honourable member (oo er missis)
Update: yep, he looks prime suspect material.
“It was a pet, not an animal. It had a name, you don't eat things with names, this is horrific!”
Rhubarb & Custard
Posts: 2097
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 4:04 pm

Hal Jordan wrote: Wed Apr 27, 2022 4:45 pm
fishfoodie wrote: Wed Apr 27, 2022 3:03 pm
C69 wrote: Wed Apr 27, 2022 1:56 pm Tory MPs now watching porn in the HOC.

:lol:
not just any old MP, but variously described as Senior, & Frontbench, by the papers, & the Whip was supposed to have been shocked.
Dear God, please let it be Rees-Mogg.



either that, or full on latex gimp fetish
Biffer
Posts: 9142
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 6:43 pm

PCPhil wrote: Wed Apr 27, 2022 6:42 pm Ah, but the game is who you would want it to be.

However I will research your right honourable member (oo er missis)
Update: yep, he looks prime suspect material.
If it's who I want it to be then it's Johnson.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
sefton
Posts: 790
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:00 pm

Biffer wrote: Wed Apr 27, 2022 7:00 pm
PCPhil wrote: Wed Apr 27, 2022 6:42 pm Ah, but the game is who you would want it to be.

However I will research your right honourable member (oo er missis)
Update: yep, he looks prime suspect material.
If it's who I want it to be then it's Johnson.
Nadine Dorries.
User avatar
PCPhil
Posts: 2422
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 10:06 am
Location: Where rivers meet

sefton wrote: Wed Apr 27, 2022 7:05 pm
Biffer wrote: Wed Apr 27, 2022 7:00 pm
PCPhil wrote: Wed Apr 27, 2022 6:42 pm Ah, but the game is who you would want it to be.

However I will research your right honourable member (oo er missis)
Update: yep, he looks prime suspect material.
If it's who I want it to be then it's Johnson.
Nadine Dorries.
Is there any Boris porn on the internet?
“It was a pet, not an animal. It had a name, you don't eat things with names, this is horrific!”
User avatar
fishfoodie
Posts: 8223
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm

Biffer wrote: Wed Apr 27, 2022 6:34 pm
Ben Wallace.
It would remove another potential Leadership challenger !



:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :clap: :clap: :clap:
User avatar
PCPhil
Posts: 2422
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 10:06 am
Location: Where rivers meet

Christ, they’re like amoebas. It’ll be 4 by tomorrow

Also love the phrase “mass debates”
“It was a pet, not an animal. It had a name, you don't eat things with names, this is horrific!”
User avatar
Hal Jordan
Posts: 4154
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 12:48 pm
Location: Sector 2814

Biffer wrote: Wed Apr 27, 2022 6:34 pm
PCPhil wrote: Wed Apr 27, 2022 6:33 pm
Hal Jordan wrote: Wed Apr 27, 2022 4:45 pm

Dear God, please let it be Rees-Mogg.
I raise you, Gove.

Any other players?
Ben Wallace.

That's where my money would be

It's not going to be Rees Mogg. His idea of sex is his wife delicately lifting her petticoats and lying back to think of England. He then has twenty seconds of light movement before exploding and immediately prays for forgiveness. The cunt.
Performatively religious types like him are always found getting spanked by a dominatrix or being noshed off by rent boys. But yes, they find it in their hearts to forgive themselves because they know Jesus loves them (but I don't).
User avatar
PCPhil
Posts: 2422
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 10:06 am
Location: Where rivers meet

Or a helping hand from Nanny.
“It was a pet, not an animal. It had a name, you don't eat things with names, this is horrific!”
User avatar
C69
Posts: 3338
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:42 pm

Any rumours of the Tory porn fiend yet?
User avatar
fishfoodie
Posts: 8223
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm

If you're wondering what todays dead cat's were to distract us from; Richie Rich was cleared of breaking the Ministerial code over his dodgy tax affairs, & keeping his Green Card, while an MP, & Minister
User avatar
fishfoodie
Posts: 8223
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm

Oh deary, deary me .... another potential Leadership challenger knifed in the back.
Sajid Javid used an offshore trust while working as an MP in the heart of the Treasury – but did not declare it in the register of members’ interests, The Independent can reveal.

As the then chancellor George Osborne’s parliamentary private secretary (PPS) in 2011, Mr Javid – now health secretary – played a key role in selling the Coalition government’s austerity policies to MPs.

But at the same time, Mr Javid was using a trust, understood to have been located in a tax haven, to cut his personal tax burden. He also served in the Treasury while the government launched a consultation on policies covering non-doms and overseas trusts in December 2011.

Earlier this month, Mr Javid admitted he had used non-dom status before entering politics and to having had an offshore trust, but it is only now that it has been revealed that he did not declare the trust as an MP and PPS.

The ministerial code states that while PPSs, who act as ministerial aides, are not technically members of the government “they must ensure that no conflict arises, or appears to arise, between their role as a parliamentary private secretary, and their private interests”.
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/p ... 66927.html
Rinkals
Posts: 2101
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 12:37 pm

Fucking halfwit!

User avatar
Insane_Homer
Posts: 5389
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:14 pm
Location: Leafy Surrey

halfwit? i think you'll find he's gone full wit, again.
“Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true.”
robmatic
Posts: 2097
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 7:46 am

Rinkals wrote: Thu Apr 28, 2022 4:57 am Fucking halfwit!

Agreed it's stupidly indiscreet, but it's not like the Russians won't know anyway. Poland is the obvious staging ground for a lot of the support that Ukraine is getting.
Rinkals
Posts: 2101
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 12:37 pm

Yes, but Boris has a history of putting his foot in it.
User avatar
Hal Jordan
Posts: 4154
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 12:48 pm
Location: Sector 2814

Meanwhile, the Government has taken control of the Electoral Commission and it's now illegal to be noisy if you want to protest about it.

Sleepwalking into tyranny.
User avatar
C69
Posts: 3338
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:42 pm

robmatic wrote: Thu Apr 28, 2022 6:57 am
Rinkals wrote: Thu Apr 28, 2022 4:57 am Fucking halfwit!

Agreed it's stupidly indiscreet, but it's not like the Russians won't know anyway. Poland is the obvious staging ground for a lot of the support that Ukraine is getting.
Even attempting tacitly giving the impression of defending Boris over this is staggering.
Read what the Polish have said ffs.
Give yourself an uppercut.
I like neeps
Posts: 3586
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 9:37 am

The Spectator is having a normal one:..
dpedin
Posts: 2979
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:35 am

C69 wrote: Thu Apr 28, 2022 8:18 am
robmatic wrote: Thu Apr 28, 2022 6:57 am
Rinkals wrote: Thu Apr 28, 2022 4:57 am Fucking halfwit!

Agreed it's stupidly indiscreet, but it's not like the Russians won't know anyway. Poland is the obvious staging ground for a lot of the support that Ukraine is getting.
Even attempting tacitly giving the impression of defending Boris over this is staggering.
Read what the Polish have said ffs.
Give yourself an uppercut.
Agreed this just gives Putin something to use in propaganda which can't now be denied/ignored. The Blonde Bumblecunt needs to be kept as far away as possible from any reporter or microphone over Ukraine given his propensity to say things he shouldn't. Feckin liability and his comments were indefensible.
Post Reply