You may be right that it is worse. Regardless, the fact that it exists at all is only serving to damage the cause and it's not a cause that can be afforded to be ignored.ia801310 wrote: ↑Sat Aug 20, 2022 2:10 pm
I would argue that the problem is even worse in the Green/Climate Change movement. There is nothing more white, upper middle class and bourgeois social-justice warrior than a climate change rally (with the possible exception of Glastonbury. The likes of XR, just stop oil and extinction rebellion are just a bourgeois social-justice warrior temper tantrum about the fact that the working class don't know what's best for them.
Stop voting for fucking Tories
- Torquemada 1420
- Posts: 11155
- Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:22 am
- Location: Hut 8
- Torquemada 1420
- Posts: 11155
- Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:22 am
- Location: Hut 8
If that's aimed at me, you need to read my post again. The bit where I say it "closes the circle to the right" i.e. in the end, both parties end up as dictating to the masses. But it's always a worse look for the Left because everyone expects the Right to be self serving.Biffer wrote: ↑Sat Aug 20, 2022 3:06 pm Yeah, the right wing middle and upper class never tries to tell the poor what’s good for them right enough.
That attitude isn’t left or right wing, it’s class. People like to pretend it’s just the other side that does it, and unconsciously justify to them selves.
To go back to my original point, you made a generalisation about privatised companies receiving subsidies, I countered by saying subsidies were not always all bad if the Govt has distorted the market to the extent that these were required to allow companies to provide the required service and not operate at a loss.Torquemada 1420 wrote: ↑Sat Aug 20, 2022 6:18 amGovts distort markets pretty much 100% of the time:weegie01 wrote: ↑Fri Aug 19, 2022 9:01 pm It is not a contradiction at all. Your 'private profits and public losses' comment shows you misunderstand my post.
If the Govt has distorted the market in some way such that it prevents a private firm from making a profit, then there is nothing wrong in the Govt compensating the firms for the market distortion. But, as I said above, only for that and not for commercial risk or incompetence. Or they can of course just nationalise and take a larger proportion of the economy into state hands.
Saying a certain type of business should or should not be state owned depends on a whole number of factors. There are core things (eg defence) I see no argument for private provision. Outside that, I see no reason why a state organisation is necessarily better than properly regulated private firms in delivering particular services.
- regulation (which you mention but assumes the pie "properly")
- tariffs
are 2 examples. Name me a market NOT affected by either of these?
On your but in red, BECAUSE a monopoly can be a properly regulated private firm and it will still always be a bad thing for the consumer. I give you water....
I further pointed out that subsidies should be for this purpose and not to reward bad management.
Whilst you are correct that there is regulation that distorts most markets, I thought I had made it clear that I was talking about situations where that distortion prevented profit, or even break even. Of course almost all markets are affected in some degree by regulation. Tesco has to conform to food standards in the same way every other supermarket does. To protect health, these regulations set a floor beneath which no firm can go, so that extent they are distortive to the grocery market. But that market needs no subsidy as the market is still essentially free and an efficient operator can make a profit.
Contrary to what you appear to be saying, I believe water is a perfect example of a poorly regulated business. Water is a monopolistic market in the UK. Failure of regulation has allowed privatised water firms to behave in ways that allow them to sacrifice the public good in pursuit of short term profits, which are passed on to shareholders and senior employees. That problem can be solved by nationalisation, or by better regulation that takes into account the monopoly situation they are in, and ensures public good comes first.
According to the National Audit Office, compared to the OECD the UK manages at the same time to have some of the lowest levels of Govt regulations coupled with the highest levels of complexity of regulation. Which is pretty much a recipe for disaster.
Agree with this, everyone knows that the Tories are a bunch of Toffs it is priced in.Torquemada 1420 wrote: ↑Sat Aug 20, 2022 4:10 pmIf that's aimed at me, you need to read my post again. The bit where I say it "closes the circle to the right" i.e. in the end, both parties end up as dictating to the masses. But it's always a worse look for the Left because everyone expects the Right to be self serving.Biffer wrote: ↑Sat Aug 20, 2022 3:06 pm Yeah, the right wing middle and upper class never tries to tell the poor what’s good for them right enough.
That attitude isn’t left or right wing, it’s class. People like to pretend it’s just the other side that does it, and unconsciously justify to them selves.
I’m making the point that it’s to do with class not politics. It happens in the centre ground as well.Torquemada 1420 wrote: ↑Sat Aug 20, 2022 4:10 pmIf that's aimed at me, you need to read my post again. The bit where I say it "closes the circle to the right" i.e. in the end, both parties end up as dictating to the masses. But it's always a worse look for the Left because everyone expects the Right to be self serving.Biffer wrote: ↑Sat Aug 20, 2022 3:06 pm Yeah, the right wing middle and upper class never tries to tell the poor what’s good for them right enough.
That attitude isn’t left or right wing, it’s class. People like to pretend it’s just the other side that does it, and unconsciously justify to them selves.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
- Uncle fester
- Posts: 4196
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 9:42 pm
Lucky you. Did same here but then redundancy to one of our incomes torpedoed that plan.fishfoodie wrote: ↑Thu Aug 18, 2022 3:35 pmAin't that the truth !Torquemada 1420 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 18, 2022 3:17 pmThems the rubs. You can't really time the house market unless you are prepared to wait for a long time.
You could also add; "& are very lucky"
I waited a long time, because I saw Ireland had an unsustainable bubble, but I still had to wait for years, & then I got lucky, when I got offered redundancy, & my payoff & savings made it possible to buy without having a mortgage. Which was just as well, because the Banks weren't going to offer me a Mortgage when I was only a wet week in my new job.
- fishfoodie
- Posts: 8223
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm
One of my workmates; who also got offered redundancy, ended up in a complete shitshow. He & his partner were in the process of buying a new home, because they had two kids, & a third on the way; they were both accidental landlords*, & she was about to go on maternity leave.Uncle fester wrote: ↑Sat Aug 20, 2022 6:05 pmLucky you. Did same here but then redundancy to one of our incomes torpedoed that plan.fishfoodie wrote: ↑Thu Aug 18, 2022 3:35 pmAin't that the truth !Torquemada 1420 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 18, 2022 3:17 pm
Thems the rubs. You can't really time the house market unless you are prepared to wait for a long time.
You could also add; "& are very lucky"
I waited a long time, because I saw Ireland had an unsustainable bubble, but I still had to wait for years, & then I got lucky, when I got offered redundancy, & my payoff & savings made it possible to buy without having a mortgage. Which was just as well, because the Banks weren't going to offer me a Mortgage when I was only a wet week in my new job.
They'd a mortgage on strength of them both working, & obviously him taking redundancy would put the kibosh on that, & until he was in secure employment again. Complete & utter shitshow.
* He used to bitch about the aggravation of being a landlord, but wouldn't consider selling either house, just to reduce their exposure to exactly this kind of thing.
- Uncle fester
- Posts: 4196
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 9:42 pm
Presume they would have been in negative equity if they did that?
- fishfoodie
- Posts: 8223
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm
Nope, hence my not being as sympathetic as I might have otherwise been. They could have sold the two rentals, & cleared a smallish profit ~10-15k, & considerably reduced their stress, & exposure.Uncle fester wrote: ↑Sat Aug 20, 2022 7:48 pm Presume they would have been in negative equity if they did that?
What an amazing idea, cos currently, right, the GPs have nothing on their plate and have tons of appointments available.... and they all study finances on the side...
Give a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.
-
- Posts: 3585
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 9:37 am
I guess the plan is when people are so cold they become ill the GP is authorised to give them a loan? I presume you don't get to book a GP just because you've run out of money.
Not that you can book a GP at the minute anyway.
I mean thinking about it sensibly, it's a perfect idea, since that way nothing will actually happen, and the poor can get fucked, just like usual.I like neeps wrote: ↑Sat Aug 20, 2022 8:15 pmI guess the plan is when people are so cold they become ill the GP is authorised to give them a loan? I presume you don't get to book a GP just because you've run out of money.
Not that you can book a GP at the minute anyway.
Give a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.
-
- Posts: 3585
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 9:37 am
We're probably about two weeks away from workhouses being suggested.Raggs wrote: ↑Sat Aug 20, 2022 8:22 pmI mean thinking about it sensibly, it's a perfect idea, since that way nothing will actually happen, and the poor can get fucked, just like usual.I like neeps wrote: ↑Sat Aug 20, 2022 8:15 pmI guess the plan is when people are so cold they become ill the GP is authorised to give them a loan? I presume you don't get to book a GP just because you've run out of money.
Not that you can book a GP at the minute anyway.
- fishfoodie
- Posts: 8223
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm
It's pure genius !I like neeps wrote: ↑Sat Aug 20, 2022 8:15 pmI guess the plan is when people are so cold they become ill the GP is authorised to give them a loan? I presume you don't get to book a GP just because you've run out of money.
Not that you can book a GP at the minute anyway.
The GPs can just prescribe HRT for everyone; & the hot flushes will mean they don't feel the need to turn on the heating so often.
Or perhaps the plan is to activate a few hundred more Shipmans; so the Tories can save on their treatment, & just render their patients down for Soylent Green, for the food banks ?
- Uncle fester
- Posts: 4196
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 9:42 pm
Oh okay. Fück them and the horse they rode in on so.fishfoodie wrote: ↑Sat Aug 20, 2022 8:04 pmNope, hence my not being as sympathetic as I might have otherwise been. They could have sold the two rentals, & cleared a smallish profit ~10-15k, & considerably reduced their stress, & exposure.Uncle fester wrote: ↑Sat Aug 20, 2022 7:48 pm Presume they would have been in negative equity if they did that?
- Torquemada 1420
- Posts: 11155
- Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:22 am
- Location: Hut 8
Oh yes. And the UK left the EC to escape the red tape imposed by Eurocrats
- fishfoodie
- Posts: 8223
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm
It was interesting to see the Govester trash Dizzy Lizzys financial fantasies today. I suppose it isn't surprising, because people have been commenting for the last couple of years, that this isn't the time to be PM.
It feels increasingly like the brighter ones in the Tory Party, are positioning themselves to be in the next Leadership race, because (a) this one is done, & (b) the life expectancy of Liz's is about the same as one of those Goldfish you win at the Fair; & after that, even if Labour win, they'll be under enormous pressure from inside, & out, & I wouldn't be shocked if they only lasted 2-3 years.
In summary; shit time to be PM for the next 3-4 years, & even the Bumblecunt will be fancying his chances of being the next Tory Leader
It feels increasingly like the brighter ones in the Tory Party, are positioning themselves to be in the next Leadership race, because (a) this one is done, & (b) the life expectancy of Liz's is about the same as one of those Goldfish you win at the Fair; & after that, even if Labour win, they'll be under enormous pressure from inside, & out, & I wouldn't be shocked if they only lasted 2-3 years.
In summary; shit time to be PM for the next 3-4 years, & even the Bumblecunt will be fancying his chances of being the next Tory Leader
The GP plan is madness. They will be flooded with appointments as 30 million people all try to see their GP in a single week.fishfoodie wrote: ↑Sat Aug 20, 2022 9:46 pm It was interesting to see the Govester trash Dizzy Lizzys financial fantasies today. I suppose it isn't surprising, because people have been commenting for the last couple of years, that this isn't the time to be PM.
It feels increasingly like the brighter ones in the Tory Party, are positioning themselves to be in the next Leadership race, because (a) this one is done, & (b) the life expectancy of Liz's is about the same as one of those Goldfish you win at the Fair; & after that, even if Labour win, they'll be under enormous pressure from inside, & out, & I wouldn't be shocked if they only lasted 2-3 years.
In summary; shit time to be PM for the next 3-4 years, & even the Bumblecunt will be fancying his chances of being the next Tory Leader
I think Kemi is a shoe-in
- Hal Jordan
- Posts: 4154
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 12:48 pm
- Location: Sector 2814
Another lurch to the right for the Tories if she gets in. At this rate they'll go so far right they'll go all the way round to being socialists.
This is bound to work How many GP's are we short of particularly in poor urban areas?
GPs could write prescriptions for money off energy bills for the most vulnerable under a plan drawn up by the Treasury, as Liz Truss’s team signalled more help with costs now forecast to top £6,000 next year.
The unusual proposal would mean people could consult their doctor for an assessment on whether they are struggling enough to require help with their bills.
Agreed - just bollox! I can imagine the GPs and the RCGP being really pleased that they are now responsible for financial assessments of patients as well as their medical needs. All they will need is a quick 2 day training programme to become a financial advisor and then off they go. Just utter hogwash.
Once the Conservatives work out how badly they've fucked up (still many years away), the PM ambitions of all these will be over as they'll all be seen as too right wing and/or corrupt to be electable. Most of them aren't even realistic now ffs, under what will probably turn out to be the most right wing UK government in any of our lifetimes.
The answer to this post of mine of who replaces Truss next year sometime after she's knifed, is far more likely to be Johnson than anyone else. Most Tory members back Johnson above every other potential candidate._Os_ wrote: ↑Mon Jul 18, 2022 10:08 pm The Tory far right's refusal to get behind one candidate, means it's now likely that Sunak will have enough support to start boosting whichever candidate he would rather face. The far right are even getting behind the candidate opinion polls of the public thought came last/second last in both debates (Badenoch), having already got rid of the candidate the same polls showed came first/second (Tugendhat). The swivel eyed loons from UKIP/Brexit Party/Britain First that have infiltrated them then help vote for the most right wing and least electable candidate whoever that is.
There's a strong chance that whoever becomes PM this all gets repeated next year. Very obvious if Sunak becomes PM, there's a large Tory constituency that will refuse to accept it and immediately start trying to replace him. Also very obvious if it's Mordaunt/Truss/Badenoch, they will be forced to compromise by reality (NI protocol etc), the far right will start ranting about their favourite thing, "betrayal", then demand the removal of the candidate they themselves supported. Johnson could even stand again.
They're a huge fucking mess and still poll at 31%.
Which is why the Daily Mail is going all in over multiple pages attacking Parliament/the privileges committee. It's also why there's been some talk of moving him to a safer seat if there's a general election. Because Johnson's chances drastically reduce if he's not an MP.
-
- Posts: 3585
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 9:37 am
As leader of the opposition maybe. But people who can't afford their bills aren't going to be interested in the culture wars no matter how much the Times and Mail want to play them. And Kemi went big on the culture wars.ia801310 wrote: ↑Sat Aug 20, 2022 10:08 pmThe GP plan is madness. They will be flooded with appointments as 30 million people all try to see their GP in a single week.fishfoodie wrote: ↑Sat Aug 20, 2022 9:46 pm It was interesting to see the Govester trash Dizzy Lizzys financial fantasies today. I suppose it isn't surprising, because people have been commenting for the last couple of years, that this isn't the time to be PM.
It feels increasingly like the brighter ones in the Tory Party, are positioning themselves to be in the next Leadership race, because (a) this one is done, & (b) the life expectancy of Liz's is about the same as one of those Goldfish you win at the Fair; & after that, even if Labour win, they'll be under enormous pressure from inside, & out, & I wouldn't be shocked if they only lasted 2-3 years.
In summary; shit time to be PM for the next 3-4 years, & even the Bumblecunt will be fancying his chances of being the next Tory Leader
I think Kemi is a shoe-in
The big problem for any Tory leader really is this winter and into next summer everyone is going to be materially poorer with a fair amount of poverty, a fair amount of negative equity and a complete feeling of malaise. Doesn't matter who is in charge for that they're done.
The Tories are utterly and completely fucked this winter. Shit being pumped into the rivers and on the beaches, millions unable to heat and/or eat, thousands of evictions, strikes all over the place, realities of Brexit hitting home, rampant inflation, likely power outages, shortages of goods on the shelves, NHS collapsing, SMEs folding under rising costs, droughts, another covid peak in winter, etc. They have completely lost control and no amount of migrant, foreigners, EU and union bashing or anti woke rhetoric is going to work this time around. Even with the help of the Daily Heil, Torygraph and Naziexpress they will lose the battle. The billionaire non-dom owners of these shitrags will turn on them very quickly once the writing is on the wall. I suspect we will see mass protests in the streets and some real anti-Gov movements, such as the Poll Tax demos, as the cold weather hits and additional fuel bills metaphorically drop through letterboxes. Truss has no idea, she is an empty vessel put into place by the ERG, and will not be able to cope personally with the pressures and she and her Cabinet will disintegrate. Many of the traditional tory voters - the farmers, the pensioners, the middle classes will see the light as the reality of the world hits them hard and they can no longer look the other way as the poor and the elderly suffer. How a wee elderly pensioner trying to survive on a standard pension of £185 a week will last the winter is beyond me. It is going to be awful.I like neeps wrote: ↑Sun Aug 21, 2022 12:15 pmAs leader of the opposition maybe. But people who can't afford their bills aren't going to be interested in the culture wars no matter how much the Times and Mail want to play them. And Kemi went big on the culture wars.ia801310 wrote: ↑Sat Aug 20, 2022 10:08 pmThe GP plan is madness. They will be flooded with appointments as 30 million people all try to see their GP in a single week.fishfoodie wrote: ↑Sat Aug 20, 2022 9:46 pm It was interesting to see the Govester trash Dizzy Lizzys financial fantasies today. I suppose it isn't surprising, because people have been commenting for the last couple of years, that this isn't the time to be PM.
It feels increasingly like the brighter ones in the Tory Party, are positioning themselves to be in the next Leadership race, because (a) this one is done, & (b) the life expectancy of Liz's is about the same as one of those Goldfish you win at the Fair; & after that, even if Labour win, they'll be under enormous pressure from inside, & out, & I wouldn't be shocked if they only lasted 2-3 years.
In summary; shit time to be PM for the next 3-4 years, & even the Bumblecunt will be fancying his chances of being the next Tory Leader
I think Kemi is a shoe-in
The big problem for any Tory leader really is this winter and into next summer everyone is going to be materially poorer with a fair amount of poverty, a fair amount of negative equity and a complete feeling of malaise. Doesn't matter who is in charge for that they're done.
The question is what will happen next? Will the tories dig in even deeper and move quickly to implementing a quasi-nazi state they have been signposting recently they want to do and ban strikes, bring in the military, impose wage controls, blame the civil service, target 'dissenting' individuals and media etc and let people die and the NHS collapse? Or will we end up with a failed Gov, the Tories disintegrating and a General Election which they will inevitably lose? Whatever happens we need the sensible, serious adults back in charge and some serious brain power, some radical ideas and real leadership to get us out of this Tory created shithole. A major shift away from the populist right wing policies is required. Someone will step forward and grab the problem, my worry it is still possible to see some (mostly English) folk think a lunatic such as a Trump/Blonde Bumblecunt will be their saviour. Fingers, and toes, crossed.
- fishfoodie
- Posts: 8223
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm
i.e. not a crisis at all, but the new normal, with a gradual slide downwards, as NHS workers get fed up, & emigrate
She’s high on the candidate list for the sacrificial party leader while the Tories spend a term being unelectable.I like neeps wrote: ↑Sun Aug 21, 2022 12:15 pmAs leader of the opposition maybe. But people who can't afford their bills aren't going to be interested in the culture wars no matter how much the Times and Mail want to play them. And Kemi went big on the culture wars.ia801310 wrote: ↑Sat Aug 20, 2022 10:08 pmThe GP plan is madness. They will be flooded with appointments as 30 million people all try to see their GP in a single week.fishfoodie wrote: ↑Sat Aug 20, 2022 9:46 pm It was interesting to see the Govester trash Dizzy Lizzys financial fantasies today. I suppose it isn't surprising, because people have been commenting for the last couple of years, that this isn't the time to be PM.
It feels increasingly like the brighter ones in the Tory Party, are positioning themselves to be in the next Leadership race, because (a) this one is done, & (b) the life expectancy of Liz's is about the same as one of those Goldfish you win at the Fair; & after that, even if Labour win, they'll be under enormous pressure from inside, & out, & I wouldn't be shocked if they only lasted 2-3 years.
In summary; shit time to be PM for the next 3-4 years, & even the Bumblecunt will be fancying his chances of being the next Tory Leader
I think Kemi is a shoe-in
The big problem for any Tory leader really is this winter and into next summer everyone is going to be materially poorer with a fair amount of poverty, a fair amount of negative equity and a complete feeling of malaise. Doesn't matter who is in charge for that they're done.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
NHS hitting the obvious and predictable wall with its workforce.fishfoodie wrote: ↑Sun Aug 21, 2022 2:39 pmi.e. not a crisis at all, but the new normal, with a gradual slide downwards, as NHS workers get fed up, & emigrate
- NHS pay has fallen dramatically in recent years and is well below what it was in real and relative terms 12 years ago once inflation is taken into account.
- Lots of NHS workers stayed on or returned beyond retirement to help out during covid. They are now leaving.
- The baby boom peak of staff is still working its way through the workforce and the nursing and midwifery workforces are worst hit with higher age profiles and retiral rates.
- Brexit put barriers in place for new EU recruitment and existing EU staff faced with increased costs of staying and living in this country plus the 'we don't want you' messaging.
- The pension changes are hitting hard - the NHS implemented the current scheme illegally according to the courts (age discrimination) and have had to do a fix which meant many could take opportunity to retire earlier than planned and worktheir final years via banks and agencies instead of being tied into a 67 retiral age. Also the pension taxation rules restricting both annual and lifetime pension pot accruals, particularly the lifetime allowance being fixed for 5 years, is hitting older higher paid staff, mostly consultants, who are all being advised to reduce working hours to avoid crippling HMRC bills. I have mates who got £25k HMRC bills this year. Any inflation matching pay increase for this cohort will mean huge HMRC bills as pension is based on ave salary and years service.
- Many staff are just knackered and have left due to the sheer toil and unremitting toll of working through covid, many have serious mental health issues as a result.
- NHS staff were disproportionately hit by covid and many died, many of their colleagues have watched this with their own inadequate PPE and support and thought why should they expose themselves to this?
- The UK Gov is not training enough doctors, dentists, nurses and midwives to sustain the current workforce let alone get us to the levels of staffing seen elsewhere in the UK. Why - to save money, don't believe the lack of training capacity nonsense, it could be done.
- Many junior or newly qualified staff leave asap to work abroad to get better pay or working conditions.
I could go on. I know of some hospitals with 25% nursing vacancy rates with no hope of recruitment to fill all the gaps - what does this mean - beds/wards closed and theatres and surgeons sitting idle as there are no theatre staff. All this was entirely predicable before and during the pandemic. It is easy to model and indeed modelling has been done. Why hasn't something been done - cost and, particularly in England, a political determination to run down the NHSand nudge patients into the private sector. However they forget the private sector does no training of doctors, dentists, nurses and midwives so where the feck the private sector is going to get its workforce when he NHS collapses god only knows! It is a shitshow of enormous proportions!
These campaigns aren't new and in the 8 years since I've been in the service things have got worse year on year and will continue to do so. We've always picked up jobs GPs should be doing (granted this has got a shit load worse in the last 2 years) and that includes out of hours. NHS24 triage isn't fit for purpose and is worse than our triage system (which is fucking shite) and contributes to between a 1/3 to 1/2 of our jobs. These jobs more often than not get left at home with advice or we're forced to get in touch with a GP which can take anywhere from 15 minutes to over an hour. In my area we have access to other pathways into the hospital which eases pressure on A&E, unfortunately this isn't the norm hence why ambulances sit for several hours waiting to get into A&E. Of course lack of beds elsewhere in hospitals compounds this issue.fishfoodie wrote: ↑Sun Aug 21, 2022 2:39 pmi.e. not a crisis at all, but the new normal, with a gradual slide downwards, as NHS workers get fed up, & emigrate
Of my 10 jobs last night, 3 went to hospital, 2 were primary care that had been redirected from NHS24 (both left at home) and the other 5 only required advice. This is a fairly typical shift.
I'm very enthusiastic about my next 30 years in the NHS.
Government cut med school places by 30%dpedin wrote: ↑Sun Aug 21, 2022 3:30 pmNHS hitting the obvious and predictable wall with its workforce.fishfoodie wrote: ↑Sun Aug 21, 2022 2:39 pmi.e. not a crisis at all, but the new normal, with a gradual slide downwards, as NHS workers get fed up, & emigrate
- NHS pay has fallen dramatically in recent years and is well below what it was in real and relative terms 12 years ago once inflation is taken into account.
- Lots of NHS workers stayed on or returned beyond retirement to help out during covid. They are now leaving.
- The baby boom peak of staff is still working its way through the workforce and the nursing and midwifery workforces are worst hit with higher age profiles and retiral rates.
- Brexit put barriers in place for new EU recruitment and existing EU staff faced with increased costs of staying and living in this country plus the 'we don't want you' messaging.
- The pension changes are hitting hard - the NHS implemented the current scheme illegally according to the courts (age discrimination) and have had to do a fix which meant many could take opportunity to retire earlier than planned and worktheir final years via banks and agencies instead of being tied into a 67 retiral age. Also the pension taxation rules restricting both annual and lifetime pension pot accruals, particularly the lifetime allowance being fixed for 5 years, is hitting older higher paid staff, mostly consultants, who are all being advised to reduce working hours to avoid crippling HMRC bills. I have mates who got £25k HMRC bills this year. Any inflation matching pay increase for this cohort will mean huge HMRC bills as pension is based on ave salary and years service.
- Many staff are just knackered and have left due to the sheer toil and unremitting toll of working through covid, many have serious mental health issues as a result.
- NHS staff were disproportionately hit by covid and many died, many of their colleagues have watched this with their own inadequate PPE and support and thought why should they expose themselves to this?
- The UK Gov is not training enough doctors, dentists, nurses and midwives to sustain the current workforce let alone get us to the levels of staffing seen elsewhere in the UK. Why - to save money, don't believe the lack of training capacity nonsense, it could be done.
- Many junior or newly qualified staff leave asap to work abroad to get better pay or working conditions.
I could go on. I know of some hospitals with 25% nursing vacancy rates with no hope of recruitment to fill all the gaps - what does this mean - beds/wards closed and theatres and surgeons sitting idle as there are no theatre staff. All this was entirely predicable before and during the pandemic. It is easy to model and indeed modelling has been done. Why hasn't something been done - cost and, particularly in England, a political determination to run down the NHSand nudge patients into the private sector. However they forget the private sector does no training of doctors, dentists, nurses and midwives so where the feck the private sector is going to get its workforce when he NHS collapses god only knows! It is a shitshow of enormous proportions!
This year because they are expensive....no long term planning. Many of the candidates I know this year are just going to shove off and so something different
Is anyone asking Truss about these tax cuts that will supposedly solve everything?
The average salary is around £30K, which means around £6K in tax and NI
The average increase in fuel bills is around £2K at the moment, projected to go up by £3K
If she cuts income tax by 50% on current rates that just about covers the fuel increases, but nothing else.
It also halves the government revenue from income tax, so there will be huge cuts or massive borrowing
Obviously these numbers are very rough
The average salary is around £30K, which means around £6K in tax and NI
The average increase in fuel bills is around £2K at the moment, projected to go up by £3K
If she cuts income tax by 50% on current rates that just about covers the fuel increases, but nothing else.
It also halves the government revenue from income tax, so there will be huge cuts or massive borrowing
Obviously these numbers are very rough
I'd be very surprised if GP's agreed to do it - they're medical practitioners, ( and abusing both their time and qualifications in such a manner is very condescending in the first place) not social welfare officers.dpedin wrote: ↑Sun Aug 21, 2022 11:02 amAgreed - just bollox! I can imagine the GPs and the RCGP being really pleased that they are now responsible for financial assessments of patients as well as their medical needs. All they will need is a quick 2 day training programme to become a financial advisor and then off they go. Just utter hogwash.
- fishfoodie
- Posts: 8223
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm
Another one for the; "who gives a fuck what happens after the next election", Pile !
The same cunts who rabbited on about becoming Singapore on Thames, or Innovation, or whatever bullshit was in their briefing papers that day; simultaneously deliberately harmed the primary schooling of millions, (the key years for STEM), & loaded up 3rd level debt, to the point where students are forced to opt out of 3rd level, in their best subject, because they just can't afford it.
Add to this; creating a hostile environment for any foreign Post-Grads, shitting the bed for Horizon Europe funding program, & doing nothing significant to replace Erasmus, & who can blame the young for just telling the >60 year olds to go fuck themselves, & work out for themselves who's going to provide care for them, & wipe their arses for the rest of their lives, because they are going to do what their Grandparents did with Brexit, & look after number one !
Yes, it was pretty obvious right from the beginning that no one with anything about them, either good or bad, had any interest in this race. It's a very temporary positionfishfoodie wrote: ↑Sat Aug 20, 2022 9:46 pm It was interesting to see the Govester trash Dizzy Lizzys financial fantasies today. I suppose it isn't surprising, because people have been commenting for the last couple of years, that this isn't the time to be PM.
It feels increasingly like the brighter ones in the Tory Party, are positioning themselves to be in the next Leadership race, because (a) this one is done, & (b) the life expectancy of Liz's is about the same as one of those Goldfish you win at the Fair; & after that, even if Labour win, they'll be under enormous pressure from inside, & out, & I wouldn't be shocked if they only lasted 2-3 years.
In summary; shit time to be PM for the next 3-4 years, & even the Bumblecunt will be fancying his chances of being the next Tory Leader
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
Don't count your chickensSlick wrote: ↑Mon Aug 22, 2022 9:30 amYes, it was pretty obvious right from the beginning that no one with anything about them, either good or bad, had any interest in this race. It's a very temporary positionfishfoodie wrote: ↑Sat Aug 20, 2022 9:46 pm It was interesting to see the Govester trash Dizzy Lizzys financial fantasies today. I suppose it isn't surprising, because people have been commenting for the last couple of years, that this isn't the time to be PM.
It feels increasingly like the brighter ones in the Tory Party, are positioning themselves to be in the next Leadership race, because (a) this one is done, & (b) the life expectancy of Liz's is about the same as one of those Goldfish you win at the Fair; & after that, even if Labour win, they'll be under enormous pressure from inside, & out, & I wouldn't be shocked if they only lasted 2-3 years.
In summary; shit time to be PM for the next 3-4 years, & even the Bumblecunt will be fancying his chances of being the next Tory Leader
Tory leadership frontrunner Liz Truss could give the government a double-figure bounce in the polls once she is installed in No 10, according to internal Labour analysis.
A memo drawn up by Keir Starmer’s director of strategy, Deborah Mattinson, claimed the foreign secretary could dramatically improve Conservative fortunes.
The document, dated 18 August and leaked to the Guardian, comes amid speculation that Truss could be tempted to capitalise on the upswing and call a snap general election.
-
- Posts: 3585
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 9:37 am
This is one of those documents designed to be leaked rather than an actual leak though.SaintK wrote: ↑Mon Aug 22, 2022 9:37 amDon't count your chickensSlick wrote: ↑Mon Aug 22, 2022 9:30 amYes, it was pretty obvious right from the beginning that no one with anything about them, either good or bad, had any interest in this race. It's a very temporary positionfishfoodie wrote: ↑Sat Aug 20, 2022 9:46 pm It was interesting to see the Govester trash Dizzy Lizzys financial fantasies today. I suppose it isn't surprising, because people have been commenting for the last couple of years, that this isn't the time to be PM.
It feels increasingly like the brighter ones in the Tory Party, are positioning themselves to be in the next Leadership race, because (a) this one is done, & (b) the life expectancy of Liz's is about the same as one of those Goldfish you win at the Fair; & after that, even if Labour win, they'll be under enormous pressure from inside, & out, & I wouldn't be shocked if they only lasted 2-3 years.
In summary; shit time to be PM for the next 3-4 years, & even the Bumblecunt will be fancying his chances of being the next Tory LeaderTory leadership frontrunner Liz Truss could give the government a double-figure bounce in the polls once she is installed in No 10, according to internal Labour analysis.
A memo drawn up by Keir Starmer’s director of strategy, Deborah Mattinson, claimed the foreign secretary could dramatically improve Conservative fortunes.
The document, dated 18 August and leaked to the Guardian, comes amid speculation that Truss could be tempted to capitalise on the upswing and call a snap general election.
- fishfoodie
- Posts: 8223
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-62626774
So even the massive number of times, we know sewage was pumped into watercourses, & the sea, is probably a low number, because the Water companies deliberately don't want to know the actual number of times