So, coronavirus...
Having returned to NZ after spending a fair bit of December and January in the UK (predominantly up North) I didn’t notice much difference in attitudes/behaviour. I probably see a few more people in masks back here but that seems about it. New York seemed the place most still “into it” on my travels. I don’t know if they were experiencing a wave but it was interesting to see pop up testing stations on corners in the central city - very few people in masks though and although I saw plenty of testing booths, I don’t think I ever saw anyone using one.
Same researchers say ... 'The team said it showed frequent handwashing and decontamination of frequently touched surfaces were vital to prevent transmission and that masks were important, both for stopping airborne spread and for preventing touching of the nose and mouth.'Grandpa wrote: ↑Tue Apr 11, 2023 5:36 pmhttps://www.independent.ie/irish-news/h ... 24304.htmlSandstorm wrote: ↑Tue Apr 11, 2023 3:24 pmLink? Because the evidence we've seen everywhere for 3 years is it's droplets in breath that spreads it more than anything else.EnergiseR2 wrote: ↑Tue Apr 11, 2023 2:49 pm
Ireland about to give up on the masks in hospitals as research from the UK and elsewhere says it spreads more on surfaces etc.
Covid spreads significantly through contaminated hands and surfaces in households, a new study suggests, as researchers warned too much focus has been given to airborne transmission.
It comes as researchers at St George’s Hospital, in London, also found that mask wearing did not help prevent patients catching Omicron in hospital, raising questions about policies during the pandemic.
In the first study of its kind, experts at Imperial College, the UK Health and Security Agency, and the University of Oxford monitored 414 people living with an infected person between August 2020 and March 2021. In research published in The Lancet Microbe, they found healthy householders were 70pc more likely to pick up the virus when it was present on surfaces or hands.
Nine in 10 people who had Covid on their hands ended up picking up an infection compared with just three in 10 of those whose hands were clean.
So conclusion from the researchers in this study is wear a mask and wash hands and surfaces regularly to avoid spread of covid at home. Sounds sensible to me.
Don't think that's what it's saying. Wear a mask in public places to avoid spreading it at home. Some judicious use of a comma might have been useful, English is a fucked up language sometimes.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
Though they follow on to say...dpedin wrote: ↑Wed Apr 12, 2023 8:47 amSame researchers say ... 'The team said it showed frequent handwashing and decontamination of frequently touched surfaces were vital to prevent transmission and that masks were important, both for stopping airborne spread and for preventing touching of the nose and mouth.'Grandpa wrote: ↑Tue Apr 11, 2023 5:36 pmhttps://www.independent.ie/irish-news/h ... 24304.html
Covid spreads significantly through contaminated hands and surfaces in households, a new study suggests, as researchers warned too much focus has been given to airborne transmission.
It comes as researchers at St George’s Hospital, in London, also found that mask wearing did not help prevent patients catching Omicron in hospital, raising questions about policies during the pandemic.
In the first study of its kind, experts at Imperial College, the UK Health and Security Agency, and the University of Oxford monitored 414 people living with an infected person between August 2020 and March 2021. In research published in The Lancet Microbe, they found healthy householders were 70pc more likely to pick up the virus when it was present on surfaces or hands.
Nine in 10 people who had Covid on their hands ended up picking up an infection compared with just three in 10 of those whose hands were clean.
So conclusion from the researchers in this study is wear a mask and wash hands and surfaces regularly to avoid spread of covid at home. Sounds sensible to me.
Masks are only useful to stop you touching yourself...However, a separate study by St George’s Hospital found wearing surgical masks in a large London hospital during the first 10 months of Omicron made no discernible difference to reducing hospital-acquired Covid infections. Researchers from the hospital looked at infection rates between December 2021 and June 2022 when staff and visitors were required to wear masks in clinical and public areas compared with after the policy was ended in June 2022.
The analysis found despite a Covid surge in June, and the ending of masks, the rate of infections was no higher.
“Our study found no evidence that mandatory masking of staff impacts the rate of hospital SARS-CoV-2 infection with the Omicron variant,” said lead author Dr Ben Patterson, from St George’s University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London.
I was clear in drawing my quote from the first study that was previously referred to.Grandpa wrote: ↑Wed Apr 12, 2023 9:11 amThough they follow on to say...dpedin wrote: ↑Wed Apr 12, 2023 8:47 amSame researchers say ... 'The team said it showed frequent handwashing and decontamination of frequently touched surfaces were vital to prevent transmission and that masks were important, both for stopping airborne spread and for preventing touching of the nose and mouth.'Grandpa wrote: ↑Tue Apr 11, 2023 5:36 pm
https://www.independent.ie/irish-news/h ... 24304.html
Covid spreads significantly through contaminated hands and surfaces in households, a new study suggests, as researchers warned too much focus has been given to airborne transmission.
It comes as researchers at St George’s Hospital, in London, also found that mask wearing did not help prevent patients catching Omicron in hospital, raising questions about policies during the pandemic.
In the first study of its kind, experts at Imperial College, the UK Health and Security Agency, and the University of Oxford monitored 414 people living with an infected person between August 2020 and March 2021. In research published in The Lancet Microbe, they found healthy householders were 70pc more likely to pick up the virus when it was present on surfaces or hands.
Nine in 10 people who had Covid on their hands ended up picking up an infection compared with just three in 10 of those whose hands were clean.
So conclusion from the researchers in this study is wear a mask and wash hands and surfaces regularly to avoid spread of covid at home. Sounds sensible to me.
Masks are only useful to stop you touching yourself...However, a separate study by St George’s Hospital found wearing surgical masks in a large London hospital during the first 10 months of Omicron made no discernible difference to reducing hospital-acquired Covid infections. Researchers from the hospital looked at infection rates between December 2021 and June 2022 when staff and visitors were required to wear masks in clinical and public areas compared with after the policy was ended in June 2022.
The analysis found despite a Covid surge in June, and the ending of masks, the rate of infections was no higher.
“Our study found no evidence that mandatory masking of staff impacts the rate of hospital SARS-CoV-2 infection with the Omicron variant,” said lead author Dr Ben Patterson, from St George’s University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London.
As you say the article was referring to a different study that came to the conclusion re hospital transmission. It is an interesting study but it is only one and will need to be replicated by others. However there are numerous other peer reviewed studies that demonstrate the opposite and that mask wearing in public and work settings did in fact reduce community transmission of covid. It is dangerous to draw assumptions from one study.
No come on, it’s dpedin, that’s exactly what he was saying. He was talking about avoiding spreading it at home.
He’s chief Freak.
Regards,
Bambi x
Oh dear!Ymx wrote: ↑Wed Apr 12, 2023 10:45 amNo come on, it’s dpedin, that’s exactly what he was saying. He was talking about avoiding spreading it at home.
He’s chief Freak.
Regards,
Bambi x
There's a big 'discussion' (read argument / barely concealed academic warfare) going on off the back of covid, between theorists / researchers who maintain respiratory infections are driven mainly by surface contact and other theorists / researchers who are convinced aerosols have a much bigger part to play than previously thought.dpedin wrote: ↑Wed Apr 12, 2023 9:31 amI was clear in drawing my quote from the first study that was previously referred to.Grandpa wrote: ↑Wed Apr 12, 2023 9:11 amThough they follow on to say...dpedin wrote: ↑Wed Apr 12, 2023 8:47 am
Same researchers say ... 'The team said it showed frequent handwashing and decontamination of frequently touched surfaces were vital to prevent transmission and that masks were important, both for stopping airborne spread and for preventing touching of the nose and mouth.'
So conclusion from the researchers in this study is wear a mask and wash hands and surfaces regularly to avoid spread of covid at home. Sounds sensible to me.
Masks are only useful to stop you touching yourself...However, a separate study by St George’s Hospital found wearing surgical masks in a large London hospital during the first 10 months of Omicron made no discernible difference to reducing hospital-acquired Covid infections. Researchers from the hospital looked at infection rates between December 2021 and June 2022 when staff and visitors were required to wear masks in clinical and public areas compared with after the policy was ended in June 2022.
The analysis found despite a Covid surge in June, and the ending of masks, the rate of infections was no higher.
“Our study found no evidence that mandatory masking of staff impacts the rate of hospital SARS-CoV-2 infection with the Omicron variant,” said lead author Dr Ben Patterson, from St George’s University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London.
As you say the article was referring to a different study that came to the conclusion re hospital transmission. It is an interesting study but it is only one and will need to be replicated by others. However there are numerous other peer reviewed studies that demonstrate the opposite and that mask wearing in public and work settings did in fact reduce community transmission of covid. It is dangerous to draw assumptions from one study.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
Agreed - and it will take the science some time yet to come to a conclusion which is probably both are right from what I have read, been told. Therefore it is probably better to assume that both aerosol and touch are the means by which covid is spread. To protect against both when there is high levels of covid around wear a mask, wash your hands and wash surfaces regularly seems sensible. It ain't rocket science, it ain't difficult and it ain't expensive - just good old fashioned public health advice.Biffer wrote: ↑Wed Apr 12, 2023 11:55 amThere's a big 'discussion' (read argument / barely concealed academic warfare) going on off the back of covid, between theorists / researchers who maintain respiratory infections are driven mainly by surface contact and other theorists / researchers who are convinced aerosols have a much bigger part to play than previously thought.dpedin wrote: ↑Wed Apr 12, 2023 9:31 amI was clear in drawing my quote from the first study that was previously referred to.
As you say the article was referring to a different study that came to the conclusion re hospital transmission. It is an interesting study but it is only one and will need to be replicated by others. However there are numerous other peer reviewed studies that demonstrate the opposite and that mask wearing in public and work settings did in fact reduce community transmission of covid. It is dangerous to draw assumptions from one study.
I’m definitely not a filthy Labour supporter*
* I do get what you are saying.
Right from your “clever” lefty playbook.
Not mask supporting = Nazi/fascist/bigot/far right.
Genuinely not what I'm saying.
Nearly every conspiracy theory, left or right wing, has an 'other' or 'them' who are controlling things and manipulating situations to meet their agenda. As you scrape away at the theory, it's pretty much always Finance->Bankers->Cartels->Zionism->Jews. You get drip fed it, they don't shout about Jews at the start, but eventually that's what you find. And by the time that's revealed, people have already bought into the theory and are committed, so one more false thing to believe doesn't find much resistance.
Either that or space lizards. But usually 'it's the Jews, innit'
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
- Margin__Walker
- Posts: 2744
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 5:47 am
I get the clumsy point you're trying to make, but that's a bit off Biffer. Probably best to save the antisemetic accusations/pre accusations for after a poster has actually done something to warrant it.
So it wasn’t what you were alluding to, but it really was. Got it!Biffer wrote: ↑Thu Apr 13, 2023 12:01 pmGenuinely not what I'm saying.
Nearly every conspiracy theory, left or right wing, has an 'other' or 'them' who are controlling things and manipulating situations to meet their agenda. As you scrape away at the theory, it's pretty much always Finance->Bankers->Cartels->Zionism->Jews. You get drip fed it, they don't shout about Jews at the start, but eventually that's what you find. And by the time that's revealed, people have already bought into the theory and are committed, so one more false thing to believe doesn't find much resistance.
Either that or space lizards. But usually 'it's the Jews, innit'
“ Nearly every conspiracy theory, left or right wing, has an 'other' or 'them' who are controlling things and manipulating situations to meet their agenda”
Christ, and now you sound like a deep state nutter yourself !!!
Explicitly pointing out that conspiracy theorists and gullible twats reliably end up like this isn't an accusation, it's a prediction (and a warning).Margin__Walker wrote: ↑Thu Apr 13, 2023 12:55 pm I get the clumsy point you're trying to make, but that's a bit off Biffer. Probably best to save the antisemetic accusations/pre accusations for after a poster has actually done something to warrant it.
Bonus: YMX not understanding that "conspiracy theories usually involve an 'other' to point the finger at" is an uncontroversial and well-supported position as opposed to something a deep state nutter would spout is just fabulously appropriate
Well, nearly every conspiracy theory has antisemitism at its heart.Margin__Walker wrote: ↑Thu Apr 13, 2023 12:55 pm I get the clumsy point you're trying to make, but that's a bit off Biffer. Probably best to save the antisemetic accusations/pre accusations for after a poster has actually done something to warrant it.
So if you're spouting conspiracy theories, you're talking about stuff that is intrinsically antisemitic, even if you don't realise it.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
- Margin__Walker
- Posts: 2744
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 5:47 am
Like I said, I fully get the point being made clumsily.JM2K6 wrote: ↑Thu Apr 13, 2023 1:41 pmExplicitly pointing out that conspiracy theorists and gullible twats reliably end up like this isn't an accusation, it's a prediction (and a warning).Margin__Walker wrote: ↑Thu Apr 13, 2023 12:55 pm I get the clumsy point you're trying to make, but that's a bit off Biffer. Probably best to save the antisemetic accusations/pre accusations for after a poster has actually done something to warrant it.
Bonus: YMX not understanding that "conspiracy theories usually involve an 'other' to point the finger at" is an uncontroversial and well-supported position as opposed to something a deep state nutter would spout is just fabulously appropriate
Jumping ahead though to a prediction of antisemitism in this case though is a shit look. Play the issue at hand.
- Margin__Walker
- Posts: 2744
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 5:47 am
Call someone an antisemite when they've earned the label, not just when you feel they are on the path to it. Until then, you're not doing your argument any favours.Biffer wrote: ↑Thu Apr 13, 2023 2:00 pmWell, nearly every conspiracy theory has antisemitism at its heart.Margin__Walker wrote: ↑Thu Apr 13, 2023 12:55 pm I get the clumsy point you're trying to make, but that's a bit off Biffer. Probably best to save the antisemetic accusations/pre accusations for after a poster has actually done something to warrant it.
So if you're spouting conspiracy theories, you're talking about stuff that is intrinsically antisemitic, even if you don't realise it.
I didn't call him one. I said he'll start spouting it if he continues down the conspiracy theory route.Margin__Walker wrote: ↑Thu Apr 13, 2023 2:06 pmCall someone an antisemite when they've earned the label, not just when you feel they are on the path to it. Until then, you're not doing your argument any favours.Biffer wrote: ↑Thu Apr 13, 2023 2:00 pmWell, nearly every conspiracy theory has antisemitism at its heart.Margin__Walker wrote: ↑Thu Apr 13, 2023 12:55 pm I get the clumsy point you're trying to make, but that's a bit off Biffer. Probably best to save the antisemetic accusations/pre accusations for after a poster has actually done something to warrant it.
So if you're spouting conspiracy theories, you're talking about stuff that is intrinsically antisemitic, even if you don't realise it.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
You’re a bloody decent sort, but I knew there was something a bit wrong with you. Don’t worry I can fix you (or them). It’s not too late for you, you can go full Nazi too, ER !EnergiseR2 wrote: ↑Thu Apr 13, 2023 2:27 pmSo I am a windowlicker and you are 'predicting' that YMX is an antisemite. YMX I warn you I have Jewish friends so this cabal of ours will be fraught with perilJM2K6 wrote: ↑Thu Apr 13, 2023 1:41 pmExplicitly pointing out that conspiracy theorists and gullible twats reliably end up like this isn't an accusation, it's a prediction (and a warning).Margin__Walker wrote: ↑Thu Apr 13, 2023 12:55 pm I get the clumsy point you're trying to make, but that's a bit off Biffer. Probably best to save the antisemetic accusations/pre accusations for after a poster has actually done something to warrant it.
Bonus: YMX not understanding that "conspiracy theories usually involve an 'other' to point the finger at" is an uncontroversial and well-supported position as opposed to something a deep state nutter would spout is just fabulously appropriate
A couple of posts have been a bit off recently on this thread and the tory one. Dpedin is definitely at the cautious end of the spectrum with regard to covid. Generally, hand washing and cleaning surfaces is recommended to stop bugs regardless of disease. Wearing a mask or preferably not mixing when obviously ill for me is also recommended (people who turned up to work coughing all over everything was a pet hate of mine pre-covid). Though I'm definitely at the stage where covid is just like any other cold or flu bug (as ive had it at least 3 times).
Twitter/social media amplifies extremes which is damaging to societal cohesion.
- Margin__Walker
- Posts: 2744
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 5:47 am
-
- Posts: 3585
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 9:37 am
Genuinely can't believe people still argue about masks, we all wore one for a while. It sucked, we moved on and got on with life.
I like neeps wrote: ↑Thu Apr 13, 2023 3:38 pm Genuinely can't believe people still argue about masks, we all wore one for a while. It sucked, we moved on and got on with life.
It’s all my fault. Let me summarise
I said that there is still the odd freak wearing a mask (as a tease)
The be-kind crew then called me
A piece of shit
Bimbo-lite
Bambi
Bamboo
Thumper
Anti-Semite
And ER was called a window licker
In the background, I asked Asmo to change my user name to Bambi, but he didn’t.
Did I miss anything pertinent?
How do the hands and surfaces become contaminated, if not via the mouth?Covid spreads significantly through contaminated hands and surfaces in households, a new study suggests, as researchers warned too much focus has been given to airborne transmission.
I drink and I forget things.
It’s not because Covid spreads more on surfaces, it’s because people’s houses are dirty. They are cleaned much less often and less effectively than those in a dentist office.
Basically that new study is a load of shit.
Biffer wrote: ↑Thu Apr 13, 2023 2:00 pmWell, nearly every conspiracy theory has antisemitism at its heart.Margin__Walker wrote: ↑Thu Apr 13, 2023 12:55 pm I get the clumsy point you're trying to make, but that's a bit off Biffer. Probably best to save the antisemetic accusations/pre accusations for after a poster has actually done something to warrant it.
So if you're spouting conspiracy theories, you're talking about stuff that is intrinsically antisemitic, even if you don't realise it.
Bravo, that is the most retarded statement I've read in a good while.
Ian Madigan for Ireland.
- mat the expat
- Posts: 1458
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 11:12 pm
You're ability to handle the Jandal, evidentlyYmx wrote: ↑Thu Apr 13, 2023 4:00 pmI like neeps wrote: ↑Thu Apr 13, 2023 3:38 pm Genuinely can't believe people still argue about masks, we all wore one for a while. It sucked, we moved on and got on with life.
It’s all my fault. Let me summarise
I said that there is still the odd freak wearing a mask (as a tease)
The be-kind crew then called me
A piece of shit
Bimbo-lite
Bambi
Bamboo
Thumper
Anti-Semite
And ER was called a window licker
In the background, I asked Asmo to change my user name to Bambi, but he didn’t.
Did I miss anything pertinent?
A non windowlicker would've been able to tell the difference between me and Biffer for a startEnergiseR2 wrote: ↑Thu Apr 13, 2023 2:27 pmSo I am a windowlicker and you are 'predicting' that YMX is an antisemite. YMX I warn you I have Jewish friends so this cabal of ours will be fraught with perilJM2K6 wrote: ↑Thu Apr 13, 2023 1:41 pmExplicitly pointing out that conspiracy theorists and gullible twats reliably end up like this isn't an accusation, it's a prediction (and a warning).Margin__Walker wrote: ↑Thu Apr 13, 2023 12:55 pm I get the clumsy point you're trying to make, but that's a bit off Biffer. Probably best to save the antisemetic accusations/pre accusations for after a poster has actually done something to warrant it.
Bonus: YMX not understanding that "conspiracy theories usually involve an 'other' to point the finger at" is an uncontroversial and well-supported position as opposed to something a deep state nutter would spout is just fabulously appropriate
- LoveOfTheGame
- Posts: 747
- Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2022 11:50 am
Fascinating how certain topics trigger posters and bring out their inner stupid for all to see. Then I realise that for these guys it's an everyday part of life sort of thing and I'm just like...
-
- Posts: 1148
- Joined: Sat Jul 04, 2020 9:31 am
I still wear a mask when I can, on buses and what not.
Mrs works on wards with covid patients. She could give it me at any point and I could give it to you.
Least I have done everything I can.
Are masks Woke or summut?
I also love wearing all black with a black hoodie and black mask in super markets.
It is awesome being followed by security guards, and then following them, to see how they like it (they don't).
Mrs works on wards with covid patients. She could give it me at any point and I could give it to you.
Least I have done everything I can.
Are masks Woke or summut?
I also love wearing all black with a black hoodie and black mask in super markets.
It is awesome being followed by security guards, and then following them, to see how they like it (they don't).
Agreed! It's amazing how things kick off for no great reason. Some folk seem incapable of having a sensible discussion and when struggling to maintain their own position resort to ad hominem attacks and start spouting bile. I obviously live rent free in YMX's head and trigger some desperate responses from him, I dont know why but it doesnt bother me. However, like I did when my kids were toddlers, it is easier to just ignore their bad behaviour and not give them the response they crave. After their feet stomping and tears of frustration die down they get fed up of being ignored and go play with another toy.LoveOfTheGame wrote: ↑Fri Apr 14, 2023 8:06 am Fascinating how certain topics trigger posters and bring out their inner stupid for all to see. Then I realise that for these guys it's an everyday part of life sort of thing and I'm just like...
On a more positive point it looks like we now have a vaccine against malaria which appears to be very effective and will save millions of lives! Looks like the University of Oxford has once again been at the forefront of this vaccine development.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-65252511