Sounds like a good tag line for Pet Sematary.EnergiseR2 wrote: ↑Tue May 09, 2023 12:05 amhttps://www.independent.co.uk/arts-ente ... 35011.htmlHal Jordan wrote: ↑Mon May 08, 2023 7:33 pm Saw Guardians of The Galaxy Vol 3 today. A really good film and a trauma conga line. I cried.
Since its debut, some of its “disturbing” content has left fans questioning the film’s age rating.
It was given a 12A age rating in the UK and a PG-13 rating in the US, which permits children to see it in cinemas.
However, the movie features several scenes of supernatural animal abuse, with CGI-rendered animals given disfiguring mutations, and grotesque mechanical appendages.
Supernatural animal abuse. That's where we have ended up. The centre must hold lads...
If Watership Down was a PG, this is likely fine. Issues are probably caused by idiot parents taking their five year olds to a 12A because they can rather than because they should. It's a rating where the onus has always been on those taking kids below the recommended age to research what the content of the film is and whether it'll be suitable for their little moppet(s). It is not the responsibility of the film to make itself suitable for under 12s.
I remember when Woman In Black came out not long after the Harry Potter films ended and parents flocked to it with their kids because Dan Radcliffe was in it, apparently oblivious to the fact that it was a spooky film based on a really scary play. Cue furore about it having too low a rating, when really it's parents abdicating their responsibility to check what they'll be showing 7 year old Samantha who are the problem.