The Official, one and only, Men's IRB Rugby World Cup 2023 thread
It was looking like a cripple fight at half time. I was thinking about watching an NFL game instead.
Edit: OK, just to clarify, I was referring to the quality of play, not about each team dominating a half.
Last edited by Gumboot on Sun Oct 08, 2023 9:03 pm, edited 2 times in total.
- Paddington Bear
- Posts: 5961
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:29 pm
- Location: Hertfordshire
The counterpoint to this is being a western European nation they are a reasonably attractive commercial proposition, unlike a lot of their contemporariesTorquemada 1420 wrote: ↑Sun Oct 08, 2023 8:57 pmSadly not. WR will starve them of any meaningful rugby and they'll get a few crumbs of funding: enough such that Braindead Billy and co have one less inflight whisky.Paddington Bear wrote: ↑Sun Oct 08, 2023 8:52 pm Nothing less than they deserved. Delighted for them. Is this Portugal arriving into a rugby nation?
Old men forget: yet all shall be forgot, But he'll remember with advantages, What feats he did that day
Same time zone and easy to get to. The bigger nations really could send even A teams for games.Paddington Bear wrote: ↑Sun Oct 08, 2023 9:01 pmThe counterpoint to this is being a western European nation they are a reasonably attractive commercial proposition, unlike a lot of their contemporariesTorquemada 1420 wrote: ↑Sun Oct 08, 2023 8:57 pmSadly not. WR will starve them of any meaningful rugby and they'll get a few crumbs of funding: enough such that Braindead Billy and co have one less inflight whisky.Paddington Bear wrote: ↑Sun Oct 08, 2023 8:52 pm Nothing less than they deserved. Delighted for them. Is this Portugal arriving into a rugby nation?
- Paddington Bear
- Posts: 5961
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:29 pm
- Location: Hertfordshire
Must have been a tough watch in the Qantas lounge at Charles de Gaulle
Old men forget: yet all shall be forgot, But he'll remember with advantages, What feats he did that day
-
- Posts: 8663
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 11:48 am
An idea I've seen mentioned somewhere is using the Lions year as a chance for a set of Euro tests where the Home Nations send, say, a XV or A team rather than senior side. It's a window that's been used a lot to play the US, Canada, Argentina and Japan; the latter pair already get tests against tier 1 regularly now (Japan would have had more were it not for covid) and the Northern American sides really need to demonstrate that they deserve such opportunities again after the last several years of results.Big D wrote: ↑Sun Oct 08, 2023 9:04 pmSame time zone and easy to get to. The bigger nations really could send even A teams for games.Paddington Bear wrote: ↑Sun Oct 08, 2023 9:01 pmThe counterpoint to this is being a western European nation they are a reasonably attractive commercial proposition, unlike a lot of their contemporariesTorquemada 1420 wrote: ↑Sun Oct 08, 2023 8:57 pm
Sadly not. WR will starve them of any meaningful rugby and they'll get a few crumbs of funding: enough such that Braindead Billy and co have one less inflight whisky.
Not a tournament per se, because you want to be giving the Georgias, Portugals and Spains as many games in that window as possible rather than eliminating them
-
- Posts: 8663
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 11:48 am
- Paddington Bear
- Posts: 5961
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:29 pm
- Location: Hertfordshire
Some sort of replacement to the Churchill Cup essentially.sockwithaticket wrote: ↑Sun Oct 08, 2023 9:15 pmAn idea I've seen mentioned somewhere is using the Lions year as a chance for a set of Euro tests where the Home Nations send, say, a XV or A team rather than senior side. It's a window that's been used a lot to play the US, Canada, Argentina and Japan; the latter pair already get tests against tier 1 regularly now (Japan would have had more were it not for covid) and the Northern American sides really need to demonstrate that they deserve such opportunities again after the last several years of results.Big D wrote: ↑Sun Oct 08, 2023 9:04 pmSame time zone and easy to get to. The bigger nations really could send even A teams for games.Paddington Bear wrote: ↑Sun Oct 08, 2023 9:01 pm
The counterpoint to this is being a western European nation they are a reasonably attractive commercial proposition, unlike a lot of their contemporaries
Not a tournament per se, because you want to be giving the Georgias, Portugals and Spains as many games in that window as possible rather than eliminating them
Won’t pretend I’ve fully thought it through, but I’ve had an idea in my head for a while that each autumn half the 6N teams should commit to playing an AI against a Tier 2 European team, 1 game of which is away (maybe a reward for the winner of the ENC). The next year the others play etc.
Old men forget: yet all shall be forgot, But he'll remember with advantages, What feats he did that day
-
- Posts: 8663
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 11:48 am
Yeah, just less frequent and closer to home.Paddington Bear wrote: ↑Sun Oct 08, 2023 9:20 pmSome sort of replacement to the Churchill Cup essentially.sockwithaticket wrote: ↑Sun Oct 08, 2023 9:15 pmAn idea I've seen mentioned somewhere is using the Lions year as a chance for a set of Euro tests where the Home Nations send, say, a XV or A team rather than senior side. It's a window that's been used a lot to play the US, Canada, Argentina and Japan; the latter pair already get tests against tier 1 regularly now (Japan would have had more were it not for covid) and the Northern American sides really need to demonstrate that they deserve such opportunities again after the last several years of results.
Not a tournament per se, because you want to be giving the Georgias, Portugals and Spains as many games in that window as possible rather than eliminating them
Won’t pretend I’ve fully thought it through, but I’ve had an idea in my head for a while that each autumn half the 6N teams should commit to playing an AI against a Tier 2 European team, 1 game of which is away (maybe a reward for the winner of the ENC). The next year the others play etc.
I wouldn't be averse to resurrecting the CC either tbh, but with the RFU's finances being what they are thanks to the idiots in charge, I can't imagine there's much will to resurrect the Saxons (or England A as they pointlessly changed it to despite the team not really existing anymore).
The two bottom teams in the 6N should play an autumn international against the top two in the ENC with the team top of the ENC at home?Paddington Bear wrote: ↑Sun Oct 08, 2023 9:20 pmSome sort of replacement to the Churchill Cup essentially.sockwithaticket wrote: ↑Sun Oct 08, 2023 9:15 pmAn idea I've seen mentioned somewhere is using the Lions year as a chance for a set of Euro tests where the Home Nations send, say, a XV or A team rather than senior side. It's a window that's been used a lot to play the US, Canada, Argentina and Japan; the latter pair already get tests against tier 1 regularly now (Japan would have had more were it not for covid) and the Northern American sides really need to demonstrate that they deserve such opportunities again after the last several years of results.
Not a tournament per se, because you want to be giving the Georgias, Portugals and Spains as many games in that window as possible rather than eliminating them
Won’t pretend I’ve fully thought it through, but I’ve had an idea in my head for a while that each autumn half the 6N teams should commit to playing an AI against a Tier 2 European team, 1 game of which is away (maybe a reward for the winner of the ENC). The next year the others play etc.
Almost a trial of relegation and promotion from the 6N. Eventually you could do an autumn relegation/promotion play off between bottom of 6N and top of ENC.
Scotland do generally try that IIRC (tier 2 in general not Euro tier 2). We were due to visit Romania and Georgia, time before that it was Australia, Italy (in Aus) and Fiji. I believe we are due to tour all three PIs next summer too. Would love to see an A gane v Spain or Portugal on a Friday during the AIs but with the league continuing through the internationals i am not sure it is possible.sockwithaticket wrote: ↑Sun Oct 08, 2023 9:15 pmAn idea I've seen mentioned somewhere is using the Lions year as a chance for a set of Euro tests where the Home Nations send, say, a XV or A team rather than senior side. It's a window that's been used a lot to play the US, Canada, Argentina and Japan; the latter pair already get tests against tier 1 regularly now (Japan would have had more were it not for covid) and the Northern American sides really need to demonstrate that they deserve such opportunities again after the last several years of results.Big D wrote: ↑Sun Oct 08, 2023 9:04 pmSame time zone and easy to get to. The bigger nations really could send even A teams for games.Paddington Bear wrote: ↑Sun Oct 08, 2023 9:01 pm
The counterpoint to this is being a western European nation they are a reasonably attractive commercial proposition, unlike a lot of their contemporaries
Not a tournament per se, because you want to be giving the Georgias, Portugals and Spains as many games in that window as possible rather than eliminating them
- Paddington Bear
- Posts: 5961
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:29 pm
- Location: Hertfordshire
Not opposed at all, I envisaged a more regular rotation as otherwise the agreement is Italy +1 (historically Scotland) get lumped with this every year. I increasingly like my ENC winner gets a home game thing - they can treat it as their shop window. If it’s Georgia, which it probably will be, roll out the red carpet in Tbilisi if they’re playing any of the 5, encourage fans over, get the media on board and put on a show. And make some money of course. If it’s Italy smash them and embarrass us into a decision.petej wrote: ↑Mon Oct 09, 2023 9:02 amThe two bottom teams in the 6N should play an autumn international against the top two in the ENC with the team top of the ENC at home?Paddington Bear wrote: ↑Sun Oct 08, 2023 9:20 pmSome sort of replacement to the Churchill Cup essentially.sockwithaticket wrote: ↑Sun Oct 08, 2023 9:15 pm
An idea I've seen mentioned somewhere is using the Lions year as a chance for a set of Euro tests where the Home Nations send, say, a XV or A team rather than senior side. It's a window that's been used a lot to play the US, Canada, Argentina and Japan; the latter pair already get tests against tier 1 regularly now (Japan would have had more were it not for covid) and the Northern American sides really need to demonstrate that they deserve such opportunities again after the last several years of results.
Not a tournament per se, because you want to be giving the Georgias, Portugals and Spains as many games in that window as possible rather than eliminating them
Won’t pretend I’ve fully thought it through, but I’ve had an idea in my head for a while that each autumn half the 6N teams should commit to playing an AI against a Tier 2 European team, 1 game of which is away (maybe a reward for the winner of the ENC). The next year the others play etc.
Almost a trial of relegation and promotion from the 6N. Eventually you could do an autumn relegation/promotion play off between bottom of 6N and top of ENC.
Old men forget: yet all shall be forgot, But he'll remember with advantages, What feats he did that day
Georgia have had a pretty disappointing World Cup. Its the first time since 2003 they failed to win a match and also the first time they have come last in their group since then. They were fortunate to scrape a draw with Portugal. They've also now dropped below Portugal in the Rankings and are now 14th (not surprising after Portugal's result yesterday).Paddington Bear wrote: ↑Mon Oct 09, 2023 11:06 amNot opposed at all, I envisaged a more regular rotation as otherwise the agreement is Italy +1 (historically Scotland) get lumped with this every year. I increasingly like my ENC winner gets a home game thing - they can treat it as their shop window. If it’s Georgia, which it probably will be, roll out the red carpet in Tbilisi if they’re playing any of the 5, encourage fans over, get the media on board and put on a show. And make some money of course. If it’s Italy smash them and embarrass us into a decision.petej wrote: ↑Mon Oct 09, 2023 9:02 amThe two bottom teams in the 6N should play an autumn international against the top two in the ENC with the team top of the ENC at home?Paddington Bear wrote: ↑Sun Oct 08, 2023 9:20 pm
Some sort of replacement to the Churchill Cup essentially.
Won’t pretend I’ve fully thought it through, but I’ve had an idea in my head for a while that each autumn half the 6N teams should commit to playing an AI against a Tier 2 European team, 1 game of which is away (maybe a reward for the winner of the ENC). The next year the others play etc.
Almost a trial of relegation and promotion from the 6N. Eventually you could do an autumn relegation/promotion play off between bottom of 6N and top of ENC.
I thought they'd do better especially after they managed first ever wins over Italy and Wales last year.
Portugal proved that you don't need to have massive, bruising players who try to smash through defences for 80 mins or hoof the leather off the ball. Instead they moved the ball by hand, passed and offloaded every chance they got and made easy meters! Most of the Tier 1 teams could learn a lot from them.
-
- Posts: 8663
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 11:48 am
They also handed Portugal a heavy defeat in this year's REC. The set up will defiitely want to look at their tournament prep as something's clearly gone a bit wrong since the spring.Lobby wrote: ↑Mon Oct 09, 2023 11:30 amGeorgia have had a pretty disappointing World Cup. Its the first time since 2003 they failed to win a match and also the first time they have come last in their group since then. They were fortunate to scrape a draw with Portugal. They've also now dropped below Portugal in the Rankings and are now 14th (not surprising after Portugal's result yesterday).Paddington Bear wrote: ↑Mon Oct 09, 2023 11:06 amNot opposed at all, I envisaged a more regular rotation as otherwise the agreement is Italy +1 (historically Scotland) get lumped with this every year. I increasingly like my ENC winner gets a home game thing - they can treat it as their shop window. If it’s Georgia, which it probably will be, roll out the red carpet in Tbilisi if they’re playing any of the 5, encourage fans over, get the media on board and put on a show. And make some money of course. If it’s Italy smash them and embarrass us into a decision.petej wrote: ↑Mon Oct 09, 2023 9:02 am
The two bottom teams in the 6N should play an autumn international against the top two in the ENC with the team top of the ENC at home?
Almost a trial of relegation and promotion from the 6N. Eventually you could do an autumn relegation/promotion play off between bottom of 6N and top of ENC.
I thought they'd do better especially after they managed first ever wins over Italy and Wales last year.
-
- Posts: 8663
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 11:48 am
I do wonder if that's really caught some tier 1 teams on the hop, they're being confronted with playing styles that don't stick to the orthodoxies of tier 1 test rugby.Sandstorm wrote: ↑Mon Oct 09, 2023 12:02 pm Portugal proved that you don't need to have massive, bruising players who try to smash through defences for 80 mins or hoof the leather off the ball. Instead they moved the ball by hand, passed and offloaded every chance they got and made easy meters! Most of the Tier 1 teams could learn a lot from them.
- Paddington Bear
- Posts: 5961
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:29 pm
- Location: Hertfordshire
They could have scored 20+ in the first half v Portugal and similar against Fiji, and we’re within a score of Wales with what 15 to go? Better execution in the 22 and that game Saturday would have been them going for a quarter. Appreciate there’s a lot of what ifs there but still, they’re a decent sideLobby wrote: ↑Mon Oct 09, 2023 11:30 amGeorgia have had a pretty disappointing World Cup. Its the first time since 2003 they failed to win a match and also the first time they have come last in their group since then. They were fortunate to scrape a draw with Portugal. They've also now dropped below Portugal in the Rankings and are now 14th (not surprising after Portugal's result yesterday).Paddington Bear wrote: ↑Mon Oct 09, 2023 11:06 amNot opposed at all, I envisaged a more regular rotation as otherwise the agreement is Italy +1 (historically Scotland) get lumped with this every year. I increasingly like my ENC winner gets a home game thing - they can treat it as their shop window. If it’s Georgia, which it probably will be, roll out the red carpet in Tbilisi if they’re playing any of the 5, encourage fans over, get the media on board and put on a show. And make some money of course. If it’s Italy smash them and embarrass us into a decision.petej wrote: ↑Mon Oct 09, 2023 9:02 am
The two bottom teams in the 6N should play an autumn international against the top two in the ENC with the team top of the ENC at home?
Almost a trial of relegation and promotion from the 6N. Eventually you could do an autumn relegation/promotion play off between bottom of 6N and top of ENC.
I thought they'd do better especially after they managed first ever wins over Italy and Wales last year.
Old men forget: yet all shall be forgot, But he'll remember with advantages, What feats he did that day
Sandstorm wrote: ↑Mon Oct 09, 2023 12:02 pm Portugal proved that you don't need to have massive, bruising players who try to smash through defences for 80 mins or hoof the leather off the ball. Instead they moved the ball by hand, passed and offloaded every chance they got and made easy meters! Most of the Tier 1 teams could learn a lot from them.
... playing out the back of a pod, too.
With so many 'decoys' that are clearly not options, I feel like Krusty watching the Generals v Globe Trotters. "They're clearly passing behind! Don't bite on the front runners!"
- fishfoodie
- Posts: 8221
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm
-
- Posts: 8663
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 11:48 am
It's going to need to. There's a real danger that the next two are going to be pretty fiscally bleak for World Rugby.fishfoodie wrote: ↑Mon Oct 09, 2023 10:29 pmThere's a real danger that this RWC might turn a profit
-
- Posts: 2097
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 4:04 pm
Don't they get their money upfront?sockwithaticket wrote: ↑Mon Oct 09, 2023 11:03 pm
It's going to need to. There's a real danger that the next two are going to be pretty fiscally bleak for World Rugby.
-
- Posts: 3064
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 7:37 am
Robert Kitson showing remarkable insouciance to the mockers' gods:
You've done it now, Bobby my boy.
https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2023/ ... -breakdownNorthern powerhouses aim to shut south out of World Cup semi-finals
Each quarter-final pits a northern hemisphere group winner against a runner-up from the southern hemisphere. Could a historic lockout be made in France this weekend?
You've done it now, Bobby my boy.
inactionman wrote: ↑Tue Oct 10, 2023 10:51 am Robert Kitson showing remarkable insouciance to the mockers' gods:
https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2023/ ... -breakdownNorthern powerhouses aim to shut south out of World Cup semi-finals
Each quarter-final pits a northern hemisphere group winner against a runner-up from the southern hemisphere. Could a historic lockout be made in France this weekend?
You've done it now, Bobby my boy.
Ireland
England
Argentina
SA
- clydecloggie
- Posts: 1198
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 6:31 am
Wales - Argentina must be the lowest-quality QF match-up ever.
Hoping Fiji can do one on England, and I've seen nothing from England suggesting they're better now than they were at Twickenham in August.
The two Qfs that will provide the eventual finalists are too close to call.
Hoping Fiji can do one on England, and I've seen nothing from England suggesting they're better now than they were at Twickenham in August.
The two Qfs that will provide the eventual finalists are too close to call.
-
- Posts: 8663
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 11:48 am
Fiji aren't looking too hot either. Struggling against Georgia and Portugal, however spirited those sides must be, doesn't scream "winning quarter-finalist".clydecloggie wrote: ↑Tue Oct 10, 2023 11:33 am Wales - Argentina must be the lowest-quality QF match-up ever.
Hoping Fiji can do one on England, and I've seen nothing from England suggesting they're better now than they were at Twickenham in August.
The two Qfs that will provide the eventual finalists are too close to call.
-
- Posts: 3064
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 7:37 am
We'll make them look like champions, don't you worry.sockwithaticket wrote: ↑Tue Oct 10, 2023 11:57 amFiji aren't looking too hot either. Struggling against Georgia and Portugal, however spirited those sides must be, doesn't scream "winning quarter-finalist".clydecloggie wrote: ↑Tue Oct 10, 2023 11:33 am Wales - Argentina must be the lowest-quality QF match-up ever.
Hoping Fiji can do one on England, and I've seen nothing from England suggesting they're better now than they were at Twickenham in August.
The two Qfs that will provide the eventual finalists are too close to call.
-
- Posts: 8663
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 11:48 am
I thought they took a cut of the proceeds too, but searching anything involving the words 'world rugby' and 'rugby world cup' is proving a little futile at the moment so I can't back that up.Rhubarb & Custard wrote: ↑Tue Oct 10, 2023 10:13 amDon't they get their money upfront?sockwithaticket wrote: ↑Mon Oct 09, 2023 11:03 pm
It's going to need to. There's a real danger that the next two are going to be pretty fiscally bleak for World Rugby.
3 underdogs go through? BoldSandstorm wrote: ↑Tue Oct 10, 2023 10:57 aminactionman wrote: ↑Tue Oct 10, 2023 10:51 am Robert Kitson showing remarkable insouciance to the mockers' gods:
https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2023/ ... -breakdownNorthern powerhouses aim to shut south out of World Cup semi-finals
Each quarter-final pits a northern hemisphere group winner against a runner-up from the southern hemisphere. Could a historic lockout be made in France this weekend?
You've done it now, Bobby my boy.
Ireland
England
Argentina
SA
-
- Posts: 2097
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 4:04 pm
Ah, then it might be guaranteed money upfront, but if their cut of the takings go above they'll switch to taking their 'share'sockwithaticket wrote: ↑Tue Oct 10, 2023 12:19 pmI thought they took a cut of the proceeds too, but searching anything involving the words 'world rugby' and 'rugby world cup' is proving a little futile at the moment so I can't back that up.Rhubarb & Custard wrote: ↑Tue Oct 10, 2023 10:13 amDon't they get their money upfront?sockwithaticket wrote: ↑Mon Oct 09, 2023 11:03 pm
It's going to need to. There's a real danger that the next two are going to be pretty fiscally bleak for World Rugby.
If the world of rugby votes to send the event to places that don't stump up the cash upfront, and let's face if that's why we're in France not SA, that's what they vote for. It does beg the question how many nations can possibly be a sole host now? You'd have England and France, and then one off bids from Italy, USA, Australia maybe, maybe even SA if they can sort the finances (so probably not)
You could look a joint hosts, but it'd be a lot of money to stump up for say just one quarter-final and maybe a semi-final, depending on if there were 2 or 3 countries hosting
- clydecloggie
- Posts: 1198
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 6:31 am
it's Australia in '27 and USA in '31, right? So two countries that couldn't care less about rugby (union, in Oz case), with shite kick-off times for big markets in Europe and SA. Not likely to be money spinners, those two.Rhubarb & Custard wrote: ↑Tue Oct 10, 2023 1:33 pmAh, then it might be guaranteed money upfront, but if their cut of the takings go above they'll switch to taking their 'share'sockwithaticket wrote: ↑Tue Oct 10, 2023 12:19 pmI thought they took a cut of the proceeds too, but searching anything involving the words 'world rugby' and 'rugby world cup' is proving a little futile at the moment so I can't back that up.
If the world of rugby votes to send the event to places that don't stump up the cash upfront, and let's face if that's why we're in France not SA, that's what they vote for. It does beg the question how many nations can possibly be a sole host now? You'd have England and France, and then one off bids from Italy, USA, Australia maybe, maybe even SA if they can sort the finances (so probably not)
You could look a joint hosts, but it'd be a lot of money to stump up for say just one quarter-final and maybe a semi-final, depending on if there were 2 or 3 countries hosting
-
- Posts: 8663
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 11:48 am
inactionman wrote: ↑Tue Oct 10, 2023 12:16 pmWe'll make them look like champions, don't you worry.sockwithaticket wrote: ↑Tue Oct 10, 2023 11:57 amFiji aren't looking too hot either. Struggling against Georgia and Portugal, however spirited those sides must be, doesn't scream "winning quarter-finalist".clydecloggie wrote: ↑Tue Oct 10, 2023 11:33 am Wales - Argentina must be the lowest-quality QF match-up ever.
Hoping Fiji can do one on England, and I've seen nothing from England suggesting they're better now than they were at Twickenham in August.
The two Qfs that will provide the eventual finalists are too close to call.
- fishfoodie
- Posts: 8221
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm
I think it was one of the sports radio shows here I heard the explanation on; the real reason why we're going to 24 teams for the next RWC, is so that the USA, & Canada can't fuck up qualification, & this is hoped to improve attendances.clydecloggie wrote: ↑Tue Oct 10, 2023 2:19 pmit's Australia in '27 and USA in '31, right? So two countries that couldn't care less about rugby (union, in Oz case), with shite kick-off times for big markets in Europe and SA. Not likely to be money spinners, those two.Rhubarb & Custard wrote: ↑Tue Oct 10, 2023 1:33 pmAh, then it might be guaranteed money upfront, but if their cut of the takings go above they'll switch to taking their 'share'sockwithaticket wrote: ↑Tue Oct 10, 2023 12:19 pm
I thought they took a cut of the proceeds too, but searching anything involving the words 'world rugby' and 'rugby world cup' is proving a little futile at the moment so I can't back that up.
If the world of rugby votes to send the event to places that don't stump up the cash upfront, and let's face if that's why we're in France not SA, that's what they vote for. It does beg the question how many nations can possibly be a sole host now? You'd have England and France, and then one off bids from Italy, USA, Australia maybe, maybe even SA if they can sort the finances (so probably not)
You could look a joint hosts, but it'd be a lot of money to stump up for say just one quarter-final and maybe a semi-final, depending on if there were 2 or 3 countries hosting
It's makes sense from the POV of a room temperature IQ promoter, but it'll make for a shit load of dire matches, & I'll be amazed if it adds significantly to to the attendance figures.
I don't know, Canada are currently 23rd in the rankings, one above Hong Kong China, there is time for them to really fuck it up before the next World Cup.
I always supported Canada and it pains me to see them in the mire like this.
As for the USA, World Rugby are chasing the dollar but the USA has no real interest, football, proper football played with the feet, is the most popular sport in the world and I remember Pele trying to kick start the game there whilst he was still a great player, nowt, nada, no interest really in the men's game.
The USA will stick to their sports, why wouldn't they?
I always supported Canada and it pains me to see them in the mire like this.
As for the USA, World Rugby are chasing the dollar but the USA has no real interest, football, proper football played with the feet, is the most popular sport in the world and I remember Pele trying to kick start the game there whilst he was still a great player, nowt, nada, no interest really in the men's game.
The USA will stick to their sports, why wouldn't they?