For.....does the NH really bitch this much or is it just RWC
- Paddington Bear
- Posts: 6649
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:29 pm
- Location: Hertfordshire
1) pots and fucking kettles, and
2) yes it is always like this
2) yes it is always like this
Old men forget: yet all shall be forgot, But he'll remember with advantages, What feats he did that day
-
- Posts: 796
- Joined: Tue Jul 28, 2020 12:09 pm
Has anyone put on armbands yet?Sards wrote: Mon Oct 16, 2023 11:14 am Du Pont having a cry.
The Irish about forward passes.
The vokken ref.
Just let it go ffs.
Sards wrote: Mon Oct 16, 2023 11:14 am Du Pont having a cry.
The Irish about forward passes.
The vokken ref.
Just let it go ffs.




The irony is strong here.
Anyone made a video or Powerpoint presentation...........no I thought not!
If only there was a ref who could communicate in French then perhaps dupont would have been able to get heard during the match. He would have had to shout loud to get heard over the multiple South Africans who back chatted to such extent that even a premiership football team would struggle to match.
Rugby's star has well and truely fallen with regard to player behaviour will be a major point from this tournament for me. Certainly not a selling point anymore.
The French need to be really persistent on this. The absence of a bilingual ref should be hammered home. We are far too passive about referees in the north due to rugby's "values" which is a disadvantage and the French should "powerpoint" the ref. This stuff is a competitive advantage in pro sport (multiple examples of this in football). The South Africans are cynical with this and we should join them to level it.
Nothing more annoying than a rugby ref throwing in a foreign language. It would be such a brain dead suggestion to only appoint referees who are bilingual in both languages they are refereeing. It’s just too obvious why.petej wrote: Mon Oct 16, 2023 12:12 pmIf only there was a ref who could communicate in French then perhaps dupont would have been able to get heard during the match. He would have had to shout loud to get heard over the multiple South Africans who back chatted to such extent that even a premiership football team would struggle to match.
Rugby's star has well and truely fallen with regard to player behaviour will be a major point from this tournament for me. Certainly not a selling point anymore.
The French need to be really persistent on this. The absence of a bilingual ref should be hammered home. We are far too passive about referees in the north due to rugby's "values" which is a disadvantage and the French should "powerpoint" the ref. This stuff is a competitive advantage in pro sport (multiple examples of this in football). The South Africans are cynical with this and we should join them to level it.
Also, the Saffers survive with English as the language despite their grasp of it.
Completely agree with all of this, particularly given the extent to which referees coach (rather than penalise) and the importance of adapting to refereeing interpretations (harder to adapt if you don’t fully grasp explanations etc).petej wrote: Mon Oct 16, 2023 12:12 pmIf only there was a ref who could communicate in French then perhaps dupont would have been able to get heard during the match. He would have had to shout loud to get heard over the multiple South Africans who back chatted to such extent that even a premiership football team would struggle to match.
Rugby's star has well and truely fallen with regard to player behaviour will be a major point from this tournament for me. Certainly not a selling point anymore.
The French need to be really persistent on this. The absence of a bilingual ref should be hammered home. We are far too passive about referees in the north due to rugby's "values" which is a disadvantage and the French should "powerpoint" the ref. This stuff is a competitive advantage in pro sport (multiple examples of this in football). The South Africans are cynical with this and we should join them to level it.
And, yeah. Rugby has lost moral the high ground around back chat etc. The amount of times at the RWC I’ve just thought, jeez… ref should just march them back ten or make it a penalty.
Wait for us to lose to you Poms next week.
That really sounds like you want to adjust the reffing to suite your endspetej wrote: Mon Oct 16, 2023 12:12 pmIf only there was a ref who could communicate in French then perhaps dupont would have been able to get heard during the match. He would have had to shout loud to get heard over the multiple South Africans who back chatted to such extent that even a premiership football team would struggle to match.
Rugby's star has well and truely fallen with regard to player behaviour will be a major point from this tournament for me. Certainly not a selling point anymore.
The French need to be really persistent on this. The absence of a bilingual ref should be hammered home. We are far too passive about referees in the north due to rugby's "values" which is a disadvantage and the French should "powerpoint" the ref. This stuff is a competitive advantage in pro sport (multiple examples of this in football). The South Africans are cynical with this and we should join them to level it.
You don't think his fractured cheek had anything to do with it
Reynal is bi-lingual and everyone has to listen to him talk about "Fool play...."Ymx wrote: Mon Oct 16, 2023 12:20 pm
Nothing more annoying than a rugby ref throwing in a foreign language. It would be such a brain dead suggestion to only appoint referees who are bilingual in both languages they are refereeing. It’s just too obvious why.

Ditto Italian refs, who's English is also their 2nd language and so English-speaking players struggle to speak to them.
- Insane_Homer
- Posts: 5505
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:14 pm
- Location: Leafy Surrey
Not half as annoying Barnes addressing every IRE/AB player by their first name.
“Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true.”
Precisely. What do you think the presentation was for by your coach? What is the back chat for? Means of applying pressure for your gain and there is bugger all between the top teams in the world (1 point between SA and France). Marginal gains. You don't have to have bilingual refs but having it out there pre match would be useful particularly if it is picked up by the media.Sards wrote: Mon Oct 16, 2023 12:28 pmThat really sounds like you want to adjust the reffing to suite your endspetej wrote: Mon Oct 16, 2023 12:12 pmIf only there was a ref who could communicate in French then perhaps dupont would have been able to get heard during the match. He would have had to shout loud to get heard over the multiple South Africans who back chatted to such extent that even a premiership football team would struggle to match.SaintK wrote: Mon Oct 16, 2023 11:42 am
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
The irony is strong here.
Anyone made a video or Powerpoint presentation...........no I thought not!
Rugby's star has well and truely fallen with regard to player behaviour will be a major point from this tournament for me. Certainly not a selling point anymore.
The French need to be really persistent on this. The absence of a bilingual ref should be hammered home. We are far too passive about referees in the north due to rugby's "values" which is a disadvantage and the French should "powerpoint" the ref. This stuff is a competitive advantage in pro sport (multiple examples of this in football). The South Africans are cynical with this and we should join them to level it.
You don't think his fractured cheek had anything to do with it
I support a football team called arsenal who spent much of the last 15 years being too nice getting booted all over the place. In many of these years they committed the least fouls and had the highest proportion of cards to fouls in the league. The last few seasons they have improved a lot all over but also critically at cynical fouling, dealing with refs and general shit housing. A lot of that is due to the coach who also seems to manage the media better than previous coaches.
Insane_Homer wrote: Mon Oct 16, 2023 1:00 pm Not half as annoying Barnes addressing every IRE/AB player by their first name.

Monsieur O’Keefe is their man.petej wrote: Mon Oct 16, 2023 12:12 pmIf only there was a ref who could communicate in French then perhaps dupont would have been able to get heard during the match. He would have had to shout loud to get heard over the multiple South Africans who back chatted to such extent that even a premiership football team would struggle to match.
Rugby's star has well and truely fallen with regard to player behaviour will be a major point from this tournament for me. Certainly not a selling point anymore.
The French need to be really persistent on this. The absence of a bilingual ref should be hammered home. We are far too passive about referees in the north due to rugby's "values" which is a disadvantage and the French should "powerpoint" the ref. This stuff is a competitive advantage in pro sport (multiple examples of this in football). The South Africans are cynical with this and we should join them to level it.
Throughout England versus France at Twickenham in round four of the Six Nations, we were treated to a fine Ben O’Keefe French display, with the Kiwi referee talking to both teams in their native tongue.
So often in world game we hear complaints that Anglophone officials aren’t doing their bit, but with the Rugby World Cup being played in France from 8 September until 28 October, O’Keefe has clearly put the work in. In fact, he has also refereed in France’s Top 14 this season, immersing himself in the game over there.
- OomStruisbaai
- Posts: 15950
- Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2020 12:38 pm
- Location: Longest beach in SH
happens when you lost. Sexton even swear at the ref. Bad NH rugby habits.
Agree, that smacks of special treatment.Insane_Homer wrote: Mon Oct 16, 2023 1:00 pm Not half as annoying Barnes addressing every IRE/AB player by their first name.
Should be shirt colour and number
“black 8, you look great in that”
“green 10, shut your gob”
Paddington Bear wrote: Mon Oct 16, 2023 11:15 am 1) pots and fucking kettles, and
2) yes it is always like this


- OomStruisbaai
- Posts: 15950
- Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2020 12:38 pm
- Location: Longest beach in SH
Sards only pot and kettle is when Marius vd Westhuizen ref the Stormers.Fonz wrote: Mon Oct 16, 2023 2:33 pmPaddington Bear wrote: Mon Oct 16, 2023 11:15 am 1) pots and fucking kettles, and
2) yes it is always like this![]()
too right
-
- Posts: 1148
- Joined: Sat Jul 04, 2020 9:31 am
Fucking'ell, how toxic is rugby culture between fans? Can we reverse it a little bit? Used to be banter was for before the game, sympathy for after..these days it's just toxic all the time.
Honestly girls, do better.
Honestly girls, do better.
-
- Posts: 9227
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 11:48 am
Completely disagree. There are too many different languages spoken at a tournament like the world cup to reasonably expect refs to have a handle on them and it's inconsistent to expect refs to have a grasp of French, but not Georgian or Japanese. The sport should have one common tongue that all teams and all officials speak.petej wrote: Mon Oct 16, 2023 12:12 pmIf only there was a ref who could communicate in French then perhaps dupont would have been able to get heard during the match. He would have had to shout loud to get heard over the multiple South Africans who back chatted to such extent that even a premiership football team would struggle to match.
Rugby's star has well and truely fallen with regard to player behaviour will be a major point from this tournament for me. Certainly not a selling point anymore.
The French need to be really persistent on this. The absence of a bilingual ref should be hammered home. We are far too passive about referees in the north due to rugby's "values" which is a disadvantage and the French should "powerpoint" the ref. This stuff is a competitive advantage in pro sport (multiple examples of this in football). The South Africans are cynical with this and we should join them to level it.
What can definitely stand to improve is the standardisation of communication by referees. Far too many of them drop in a lot of colloquialism and speak very quickly, some of them in accents that will be difficult to decipher for those hearing English as their second or third language. Officials need to be clear and concise.
- OomStruisbaai
- Posts: 15950
- Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2020 12:38 pm
- Location: Longest beach in SH
I like "The South Africans are cynical with this and we should join them to level it.". The idiot forget South Africa play in the NH competitions. He is welcome to compare Kolisi /Vermeulen/ Bongi with any other team. Bongi is a bit irritating but not even close to Sexton.sockwithaticket wrote: Tue Oct 17, 2023 8:26 amCompletely disagree. There are too many different languages spoken at a tournament like the world cup to reasonably expect refs to have a handle on them and it's inconsistent to expect refs to have a grasp of French, but not Georgian or Japanese. The sport should have one common tongue that all teams and all officials speak.petej wrote: Mon Oct 16, 2023 12:12 pmIf only there was a ref who could communicate in French then perhaps dupont would have been able to get heard during the match. He would have had to shout loud to get heard over the multiple South Africans who back chatted to such extent that even a premiership football team would struggle to match.SaintK wrote: Mon Oct 16, 2023 11:42 am
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
The irony is strong here.
Anyone made a video or Powerpoint presentation...........no I thought not!
Rugby's star has well and truely fallen with regard to player behaviour will be a major point from this tournament for me. Certainly not a selling point anymore.
The French need to be really persistent on this. The absence of a bilingual ref should be hammered home. We are far too passive about referees in the north due to rugby's "values" which is a disadvantage and the French should "powerpoint" the ref. This stuff is a competitive advantage in pro sport (multiple examples of this in football). The South Africans are cynical with this and we should join them to level it.
What can definitely stand to improve is the standardisation of communication by referees. Far too many of them drop in a lot of colloquialism and speak very quickly, some of them in accents that will be difficult to decipher for those hearing English as their second or third language. Officials need to be clear and concise.
O'Keefe also does/did it.Insane_Homer wrote: Mon Oct 16, 2023 1:00 pm Not half as annoying Barnes addressing every IRE/AB player by their first name.
Heard him call Eben, Duane, Bongi, Syia and Deon by their first names during the match. I don't mind it though. What's your problem with it. I think it's beneficial when referees have a good report with the players.
As long as he says "Hands off Retshegofaditswe" tooBlake wrote: Tue Oct 17, 2023 9:20 amO'Keefe also does/did it.Insane_Homer wrote: Mon Oct 16, 2023 1:00 pm Not half as annoying Barnes addressing every IRE/AB player by their first name.
Heard him call Eben, Duane, Bongi, Syia and Deon by their first names during the match. I don't mind it though. What's your problem with it. I think it's beneficial when referees have a good report with the players.

They learned from the masters Sards.Sards wrote: Mon Oct 16, 2023 11:14 am Du Pont having a cry.
The Irish about forward passes.
The vokken ref.
Just let it go ffs.
Still haven't sussed out video production yet, but it will come
I drink and I forget things.
- Guy Smiley
- Posts: 6635
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:52 pm
-
- Posts: 370
- Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2020 11:22 pm
Tri-lingual (at least) as he also speaks Spanish which he's used when reffing Argentina (outwith World Cup matches).Sandstorm wrote: Mon Oct 16, 2023 12:47 pmReynal is bi-lingual and everyone has to listen to him talk about "Fool play...."Ymx wrote: Mon Oct 16, 2023 12:20 pm
Nothing more annoying than a rugby ref throwing in a foreign language. It would be such a brain dead suggestion to only appoint referees who are bilingual in both languages they are refereeing. It’s just too obvious why.
![]()
Ditto Italian refs, who's English is also their 2nd language and so English-speaking players struggle to speak to them.
-
- Posts: 370
- Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2020 11:22 pm
That puzzled me a bit. Scotland had O'Keeffe for a warm-up match against France and he communicated in both English and French throughout the game. World Cup rolls around and he only uses French on a single occasion in the quarter-final.Ata Rangi wrote: Mon Oct 16, 2023 1:20 pmMonsieur O’Keefe is their man.petej wrote: Mon Oct 16, 2023 12:12 pmIf only there was a ref who could communicate in French then perhaps dupont would have been able to get heard during the match. He would have had to shout loud to get heard over the multiple South Africans who back chatted to such extent that even a premiership football team would struggle to match.SaintK wrote: Mon Oct 16, 2023 11:42 am
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
The irony is strong here.
Anyone made a video or Powerpoint presentation...........no I thought not!
Rugby's star has well and truely fallen with regard to player behaviour will be a major point from this tournament for me. Certainly not a selling point anymore.
The French need to be really persistent on this. The absence of a bilingual ref should be hammered home. We are far too passive about referees in the north due to rugby's "values" which is a disadvantage and the French should "powerpoint" the ref. This stuff is a competitive advantage in pro sport (multiple examples of this in football). The South Africans are cynical with this and we should join them to level it.
Throughout England versus France at Twickenham in round four of the Six Nations, we were treated to a fine Ben O’Keefe French display, with the Kiwi referee talking to both teams in their native tongue.
So often in world game we hear complaints that Anglophone officials aren’t doing their bit, but with the Rugby World Cup being played in France from 8 September until 28 October, O’Keefe has clearly put the work in. In fact, he has also refereed in France’s Top 14 this season, immersing himself in the game over there.
My assumption is that World Rugby instructed refs to only use a single language (English) throughout the tournament for consistency among officials and towards the teams they are taking charge of.
- Guy Smiley
- Posts: 6635
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:52 pm
That would be a fair take... and insistence on a single language to go with the directive on watches.topofthemoon wrote: Tue Oct 17, 2023 9:15 pm
My assumption is that World Rugby instructed refs to only use a single language (English) throughout the tournament for consistency among officials and towards the teams they are taking charge of.
WR wouldn't know reason or logic if they fell over it.
- OomStruisbaai
- Posts: 15950
- Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2020 12:38 pm
- Location: Longest beach in SH
The French crowd boooing the match officials yesterday was a new one.
-
- Posts: 1017
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 10:08 pm
Tell me you've never watched any French rugby without telling me you've never watched any French rugbyOomStruisbaai wrote: Sun Oct 22, 2023 10:10 am The French crowd boooing the match officials yesterday was a new one.



- OomStruisbaai
- Posts: 15950
- Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2020 12:38 pm
- Location: Longest beach in SH
Find it weird they booo the ref for losing the previous week.Dinsdale Piranha wrote: Sun Oct 22, 2023 11:07 amTell me you've never watched any French rugby without telling me you've never watched any French rugbyOomStruisbaai wrote: Sun Oct 22, 2023 10:10 am The French crowd boooing the match officials yesterday was a new one.![]()
![]()
![]()
I was just about to say that!Dinsdale Piranha wrote: Sun Oct 22, 2023 11:07 amTell me you've never watched any French rugby without telling me you've never watched any French rugbyOomStruisbaai wrote: Sun Oct 22, 2023 10:10 am The French crowd boooing the match officials yesterday was a new one.![]()
![]()
![]()
-
- Posts: 1148
- Joined: Sat Jul 04, 2020 9:31 am
Ref drama is all part and parcel of the professional product of Rugby Union...nothing keeps you all interested, and talking (miserably bitching) throughout the week, quite like feeling hard done by about the Ref.
They probably ran the numbers.
You honestly don't want rugby run competently or fairly.
It would be a snooze fest.
Outrage and drama after, are all a deliberate part of the product.
Throw in nationalistic deep seated historic rivalries.. flags, singing, anthems, religious hymns, military stuff, finger jabbing, morality tales and harkas and you have a great sporting product apparently.
They probably ran the numbers.
You honestly don't want rugby run competently or fairly.
It would be a snooze fest.
Outrage and drama after, are all a deliberate part of the product.
Throw in nationalistic deep seated historic rivalries.. flags, singing, anthems, religious hymns, military stuff, finger jabbing, morality tales and harkas and you have a great sporting product apparently.
Fuck off soy Boy this isn't tiddlewinksLine6 HXFX wrote: Tue Oct 17, 2023 6:18 am Fucking'ell, how toxic is rugby culture between fans? Can we reverse it a little bit? Used to be banter was for before the game, sympathy for after..these days it's just toxic all the time.
Honestly girls, do better.

-
- Posts: 1148
- Joined: Sat Jul 04, 2020 9:31 am
Just saying it is a sport that is deliberately designed to create outrage and anger amongst supporters, (before during and after games). And it is fucking great at it, and it works to keep the game in supporters minds and in the news.
This is the product you are purchasing.
Outrage is a much better by-product than disappointment or loss of interest or belief for the paying public..after losses.
Ffs they even have laws (that are "interpreted" by a actual human, who acts as judge) instead of proper rules.
How fucked up is that?
It is all a deliberate calculated professional psyche fuck.
Like the daily mail, they drag you in with flags, patriotism, anthems, national pride, and keep you hooked with anger and outrage, about decisions of the ref, player statements, coaches statements..personalities, drama..
No important game can ever be lost by a team...without outrage, that lasts at least a week.. about summut.
Professional Rugby is just resenta'tainment now.
This is the product you are purchasing.
Outrage is a much better by-product than disappointment or loss of interest or belief for the paying public..after losses.
Ffs they even have laws (that are "interpreted" by a actual human, who acts as judge) instead of proper rules.
How fucked up is that?
It is all a deliberate calculated professional psyche fuck.
Like the daily mail, they drag you in with flags, patriotism, anthems, national pride, and keep you hooked with anger and outrage, about decisions of the ref, player statements, coaches statements..personalities, drama..
No important game can ever be lost by a team...without outrage, that lasts at least a week.. about summut.
Professional Rugby is just resenta'tainment now.