RWC SF1: Argentina v New Zealand
-
- Posts: 9230
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 11:48 am
Did an Argentinian shag Gardner's missus? He's riding them hard. A lot of marginal stuff being called against them and it's really not like the ABs need the help.
Could not have said it better.sockwithaticket wrote: Fri Oct 20, 2023 7:27 pm Did an Argentinian shag Gardner's missus? He's riding them hard. A lot of marginal stuff being called against them and it's really not like the ABs need the help.
A lot of instructions to one team and whistling the other. Not going to effect the result just the margin.sockwithaticket wrote: Fri Oct 20, 2023 7:27 pm Did an Argentinian shag Gardner's missus? He's riding them hard. A lot of marginal stuff being called against them and it's really not like the ABs need the help.
Hey they are in a frenzy the least decision that goes the ABs way is a major issue, anything going to the Pumas is of course fine.
Its poor both ways, tbh.Jethro wrote: Fri Oct 20, 2023 7:35 pmHey they are in a frenzy the least decision that goes the ABs way is a major issue, anything going to the Pumas is of course fine.
The ones in the lead up to the mauls were wrong - hands on the deck at the ruck and then no contact in the air at the lineout - when you get a maul going it's very difficult to not get penalties in your favour and the mauls were as a result of dodgy decisionsBig D wrote: Fri Oct 20, 2023 7:37 pm Gardner is not a good ref and has made mistakes but his early penalties v Argentina in the maul were right.
Fuck off. If those 2 out there can’t work out where a lineout should take place, they’re shite. Doesn’t matter who the fan favours.Jethro wrote: Fri Oct 20, 2023 7:35 pmHey they are in a frenzy the least decision that goes the ABs way is a major issue, anything going to the Pumas is of course fine.
Noticed that. Was thinking the cynicism of it was potentially yellow card worthy but no replay to confirm.PCPhil wrote: Fri Oct 20, 2023 7:39 pm So typical that when there is a penalty against NZ that another penalty to stop a try happens.
- Insane_Homer
- Posts: 5506
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:14 pm
- Location: Leafy Surrey
The second one was so blatant and worth a yellow, but Angus was on the wrong side to see itPCPhil wrote: Fri Oct 20, 2023 7:39 pm So typical that when there is a penalty against NZ that another penalty to stop a try happens.
“Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true.”
Not sure what the TMO was doingInsane_Homer wrote: Fri Oct 20, 2023 7:41 pmThe second one was so blatant and worth a yellow, but Angus was on the wrong side to see itPCPhil wrote: Fri Oct 20, 2023 7:39 pm So typical that when there is a penalty against NZ that another penalty to stop a try happens.
Me neitherStranger wrote: Fri Oct 20, 2023 7:44 pmNot sure what the TMO was doingInsane_Homer wrote: Fri Oct 20, 2023 7:41 pmThe second one was so blatant and worth a yellow, but Angus was on the wrong side to see itPCPhil wrote: Fri Oct 20, 2023 7:39 pm So typical that when there is a penalty against NZ that another penalty to stop a try happens.
FFs just enjoy the rugby and stop bashing the ref
- Insane_Homer
- Posts: 5506
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:14 pm
- Location: Leafy Surrey
Whitelock beyond the ruck in the 22 on attack illegally holding players, ignored. Consistency please Angus
“Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true.”
-
- Posts: 9230
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 11:48 am
Precious little to cheer about unless you're supporting NZ and from the early response it seemed like the majority were trying to get behind Argentina.