Paddington Bear wrote: Wed Jul 31, 2024 10:19 am
I tend to agree with Slick.
We’ve seen two riots in two weeks. Both by knuckle dragging droogs but for very different causes.
What unites the two is:
1) a total breakdown of trust between that community and the police; and
2) the absence of information from the police that would have likely mitigated the situation allowed fake narratives to spread that inflamed tensions.
Basically, in the age we live, the police have to work faster. Probably everyone at GMP knew quickly that the incident had started with haymakers to the back of a policeman’s head. They had to get that footage out there far quicker than they did. The police knew the murderer was not a Muslim, and had to issue information confirming his background then telling everyone to let justice take its course basically straight away.
As a country we have to do better than this. Multiple children stabbed in cold blood has to lead to more than thoughts and prayers.
The police released the information early that the killer is British and his parents are from Rwanda, they also immediately said that it wasn't a terror incident. I'm not sure how much quicker the police could've been without risking the release of info which turns out to be false, which would've damaged police credibility.
In Southport a group of highly motivated actors immediately started lying to gain political capital from a horrific crime. A lot of them have huge media platforms, or are actual media platforms (imagine being an editor and immediately deciding to run with "multi culturalism has failed" type lines). Unlike Manchester this crime is quite uncomfortable to talk about at all because of its horrific nature, unimaginable to try and gain from it somehow. But that's what the likes of Frog Face have decided to do, he's an elected MP but refused to go to Parliament and ask questions he deems important when this crime was discussed, instead he's on social media claiming "I just wonder if the truth is being withheld from us" (by us he presumably means elected MPs who refuse to turn up and ask questions?).
The agenda of Frog Face and friends is becoming more mask off by the day. They also blamed the Harehills riot in Leeds on Muslims and immigrants. I went on the census map to see what the demographics of that area were, it's less than 20% white and less than 10% white British, but (from memory) it was 70% British nationals with a small majority of the area UK born. Before the stuff about the spark being child services and the Roma, it was very obvious during that incident that "immigrant" was being used by people who really meant "not white". Frog Face has done this before, he said most people in London weren't British when a majority of people in London were born in the UK, he conflated not being white with being an immigrant and ignored all criticism pointing that out. To my knowledge he never corrects any of these conflations between immigrants and people who aren't white.
Once police said this killer was black British, not many of those rioting would've given a shit. To them that is a "immigrant", a convient word they use to hide their real views.