Things that don't deserve their own thread

Where goats go to escape
User avatar
Gumboot
Posts: 8711
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 9:17 am

Kiwias wrote: Mon Sep 09, 2024 4:59 amRIP

The bass in that song is stunning.
Yep, iconic. Think Mr Smiley posted that it's his favourite song.
User avatar
Guy Smiley
Posts: 6636
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:52 pm

Gumboot wrote: Mon Sep 09, 2024 5:39 am
Kiwias wrote: Mon Sep 09, 2024 4:59 amRIP

The bass in that song is stunning.
Yep, iconic. Think Mr Smiley posted that it's his favourite song.
It is... :thumbup:

RIP Herbie Flowers. (it's two basses)

Dinsdale Piranha
Posts: 1018
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 10:08 pm

Guy Smiley wrote: Mon Sep 09, 2024 10:45 am
Gumboot wrote: Mon Sep 09, 2024 5:39 am
Kiwias wrote: Mon Sep 09, 2024 4:59 amRIP

The bass in that song is stunning.
Yep, iconic. Think Mr Smiley posted that it's his favourite song.
It is... :thumbup:

RIP Herbie Flowers. (it's two basses)

RIP.

I listened to a lot of Sky in my youth. I met Herbie at one of their Christmas gigs as my uncle was supporting them. Herbie didn't understand why I wanted him to sign the album I had purchased - didn't think he was important enough :lol:
User avatar
fishfoodie
Posts: 8728
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm

Woodchipper. Very. Very. Slowly !

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/ce8drzm09j0o
User avatar
Uncle fester
Posts: 4919
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 9:42 pm

fishfoodie wrote: Mon Sep 09, 2024 7:09 pm Woodchipper. Very. Very. Slowly !

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/ce8drzm09j0o
The suspect is aware of police methodologies? What does that mean? A spook maybe?
User avatar
Sandstorm
Posts: 11674
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:05 pm
Location: England

Uncle fester wrote: Mon Sep 09, 2024 10:44 pm
fishfoodie wrote: Mon Sep 09, 2024 7:09 pm Woodchipper. Very. Very. Slowly !

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/ce8drzm09j0o
The suspect is aware of police methodologies? What does that mean? A spook maybe?
He knew Brizzie coppers would take 7 days to get organised, so he fled on Day 6.
User avatar
TB63
Posts: 4293
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 9:11 pm
Location: Tinopolis

I love watching little children running and screaming, playing hide and seek in the playground.
They don't know I'm using blanks..
User avatar
Gumboot
Posts: 8711
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 9:17 am

Onya, Chaz!

Slick
Posts: 13220
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:58 pm

I said on another thread I'd been reading Ultra-Processed People by Dr Chris Van Tulleken. It's pretty good and very shocking.

But I got to a bit last night where he claimed that it doesn't matter how much exercise you do our bodies don't burn any more calories. So for a man it's about 2500 calories a day (or similar) and no matter what exercise you do, that's all our bodies will burn, so exercise is no good for weight loss. That seems mental
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
Biffer
Posts: 10014
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 6:43 pm

Slick wrote: Fri Sep 13, 2024 9:45 am I said on another thread I'd been reading Ultra-Processed People by Dr Chris Van Tulleken. It's pretty good and very shocking.

But I got to a bit last night where he claimed that it doesn't matter how much exercise you do our bodies don't burn any more calories. So for a man it's about 2500 calories a day (or similar) and no matter what exercise you do, that's all our bodies will burn, so exercise is no good for weight loss. That seems mental
Sounds like pretty obvious bullshit
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
inactionman
Posts: 3398
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 7:37 am

Slick wrote: Fri Sep 13, 2024 9:45 am I said on another thread I'd been reading Ultra-Processed People by Dr Chris Van Tulleken. It's pretty good and very shocking.

But I got to a bit last night where he claimed that it doesn't matter how much exercise you do our bodies don't burn any more calories. So for a man it's about 2500 calories a day (or similar) and no matter what exercise you do, that's all our bodies will burn, so exercise is no good for weight loss. That seems mental
Does he mean we can't do more than 2,500 calories of work, or that exercise won't increase our base metabolism so we'll always burn the same for a given level of activity, regardless of fitness/muscle mass?
Slick
Posts: 13220
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:58 pm

inactionman wrote: Fri Sep 13, 2024 10:14 am
Slick wrote: Fri Sep 13, 2024 9:45 am I said on another thread I'd been reading Ultra-Processed People by Dr Chris Van Tulleken. It's pretty good and very shocking.

But I got to a bit last night where he claimed that it doesn't matter how much exercise you do our bodies don't burn any more calories. So for a man it's about 2500 calories a day (or similar) and no matter what exercise you do, that's all our bodies will burn, so exercise is no good for weight loss. That seems mental
Does he mean we can't do more than 2,500 calories of work, or that exercise won't increase our base metabolism so we'll always burn the same for a given level of activity, regardless of fitness/muscle mass?
He's saying that our body burns 2500 calories a day whether we sit on our arse or go for a run. If we run we might burn more calories whilst running, but our body then cuts back on the calories it burns for the rest of the day, so there is no gain.
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
Dogbert
Posts: 791
Joined: Sun Jul 12, 2020 7:32 am

Biffer wrote: Fri Sep 13, 2024 10:00 am
Slick wrote: Fri Sep 13, 2024 9:45 am I said on another thread I'd been reading Ultra-Processed People by Dr Chris Van Tulleken. It's pretty good and very shocking.

But I got to a bit last night where he claimed that it doesn't matter how much exercise you do our bodies don't burn any more calories. So for a man it's about 2500 calories a day (or similar) and no matter what exercise you do, that's all our bodies will burn, so exercise is no good for weight loss. That seems mental
Sounds like pretty obvious bullshit
This is mainly based on a series of studies by US anthropologist Herman Pontzer in 2015.

Pontzer studied the Hadza tribe in Tanzania, who live a unique hunter-gatherer lifestyle, spending hours each day hiking for miles and carrying heavy equipment to forage for food.

Using specialist equipment, he measured the energy expenditure of 30 of the tribe members and found it to be very similar to the average Briton
However, there are a number of problems with this research, Firstly, there may be many reasons why members of the Hadza tribe use up little energy.
Professor Mike Gleeson, researcher in exercise biochemistry at Loughborough University, says: 'The amount of calories you expend is dependent on your body mass, because it requires more energy to move around a bigger body.

'The Hazda are slim due to genetics and their diet – and the smaller you are the less energy you use.'

Other research – more representative of the UK population – has found the opposite to Pontzer.

Adam Collins, associate professor of nutrition at the University of Surrey. 'Data from the UK military, who have very high levels of activity, shows they do burn far more calories than the average person and, if they don't eat enough to counter that, they lose weight.'

That being said, I believe the old adage that you cant outrun a bad diet. still stands true
Lager & Lime - we don't do cocktails
inactionman
Posts: 3398
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 7:37 am

Slick wrote: Fri Sep 13, 2024 10:18 am
inactionman wrote: Fri Sep 13, 2024 10:14 am
Slick wrote: Fri Sep 13, 2024 9:45 am I said on another thread I'd been reading Ultra-Processed People by Dr Chris Van Tulleken. It's pretty good and very shocking.

But I got to a bit last night where he claimed that it doesn't matter how much exercise you do our bodies don't burn any more calories. So for a man it's about 2500 calories a day (or similar) and no matter what exercise you do, that's all our bodies will burn, so exercise is no good for weight loss. That seems mental
Does he mean we can't do more than 2,500 calories of work, or that exercise won't increase our base metabolism so we'll always burn the same for a given level of activity, regardless of fitness/muscle mass?
He's saying that our body burns 2500 calories a day whether we sit on our arse or go for a run. If we run we might burn more calories whilst running, but our body then cuts back on the calories it burns for the rest of the day, so there is no gain.
I'd be interested to read it, as it sounds like he might be ring-fencing the conditions a bit. The body will constantly adapt, e.g. to slow metabolism if you've fasted, so I can understand it might slow down after an ad-hoc period of intense exercise, but if the exercise is continual then I can't see how it has that option.
Biffer
Posts: 10014
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 6:43 pm

Slick wrote: Fri Sep 13, 2024 10:18 am
inactionman wrote: Fri Sep 13, 2024 10:14 am
Slick wrote: Fri Sep 13, 2024 9:45 am I said on another thread I'd been reading Ultra-Processed People by Dr Chris Van Tulleken. It's pretty good and very shocking.

But I got to a bit last night where he claimed that it doesn't matter how much exercise you do our bodies don't burn any more calories. So for a man it's about 2500 calories a day (or similar) and no matter what exercise you do, that's all our bodies will burn, so exercise is no good for weight loss. That seems mental
Does he mean we can't do more than 2,500 calories of work, or that exercise won't increase our base metabolism so we'll always burn the same for a given level of activity, regardless of fitness/muscle mass?
He's saying that our body burns 2500 calories a day whether we sit on our arse or go for a run. If we run we might burn more calories whilst running, but our body then cuts back on the calories it burns for the rest of the day, so there is no gain.
If that was the case, people going on trans-arctic walks and consuming 10,000 calories a day would come back having put on 40 kg. That's demonstrably not the case.

As a physicist, it seems to me to be in direct contravention of the laws of thermodynamics.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
inactionman
Posts: 3398
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 7:37 am

Whilst we're on subject of physiology:
Ig Nobel prize goes to team who found mammals can breathe through anuses
https://www.theguardian.com/science/202 ... ugh-anuses
Last edited by inactionman on Fri Sep 13, 2024 11:14 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
fishfoodie
Posts: 8728
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm

Biffer wrote: Fri Sep 13, 2024 10:52 am
Slick wrote: Fri Sep 13, 2024 10:18 am
inactionman wrote: Fri Sep 13, 2024 10:14 am

Does he mean we can't do more than 2,500 calories of work, or that exercise won't increase our base metabolism so we'll always burn the same for a given level of activity, regardless of fitness/muscle mass?
He's saying that our body burns 2500 calories a day whether we sit on our arse or go for a run. If we run we might burn more calories whilst running, but our body then cuts back on the calories it burns for the rest of the day, so there is no gain.
If that was the case, people going on trans-arctic walks and consuming 10,000 calories a day would come back having put on 40 kg. That's demonstrably not the case.

As a physicist, it seems to me to be in direct contravention of the laws of thermodynamics.
Same thing occurred to me !

It's like the contention that bumble bees somehow break these laws; I think it more likely that the issue is our understanding of the the dynamics of flight, or physiology, & not that some Laws that have withstood centuries of scrutiny have suddenly fallen.
Biffer
Posts: 10014
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 6:43 pm

fishfoodie wrote: Fri Sep 13, 2024 11:13 am
Biffer wrote: Fri Sep 13, 2024 10:52 am
Slick wrote: Fri Sep 13, 2024 10:18 am

He's saying that our body burns 2500 calories a day whether we sit on our arse or go for a run. If we run we might burn more calories whilst running, but our body then cuts back on the calories it burns for the rest of the day, so there is no gain.
If that was the case, people going on trans-arctic walks and consuming 10,000 calories a day would come back having put on 40 kg. That's demonstrably not the case.

As a physicist, it seems to me to be in direct contravention of the laws of thermodynamics.
Same thing occurred to me !

It's like the contention that bumble bees somehow break these laws; I think it more likely that the issue is our understanding of the the dynamics of flight, or physiology, & not that some Laws that have withstood centuries of scrutiny have suddenly fallen.
Yeah, the whole 'bumblebees shouldn't be able to fly' thing was around for years until someone discovered how they generate lift on the upbeat of their wing movement as well as the downbeat.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
Slick
Posts: 13220
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:58 pm

Biffer wrote: Fri Sep 13, 2024 10:52 am
Slick wrote: Fri Sep 13, 2024 10:18 am
inactionman wrote: Fri Sep 13, 2024 10:14 am

Does he mean we can't do more than 2,500 calories of work, or that exercise won't increase our base metabolism so we'll always burn the same for a given level of activity, regardless of fitness/muscle mass?
He's saying that our body burns 2500 calories a day whether we sit on our arse or go for a run. If we run we might burn more calories whilst running, but our body then cuts back on the calories it burns for the rest of the day, so there is no gain.
If that was the case, people going on trans-arctic walks and consuming 10,000 calories a day would come back having put on 40 kg. That's demonstrably not the case.

As a physicist, it seems to me to be in direct contravention of the laws of thermodynamics.
Yup, my immediate thought was Olympic rowers who are also consuming a lot of calories.
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
robmatic
Posts: 2313
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 7:46 am

Slick wrote: Fri Sep 13, 2024 10:18 am
inactionman wrote: Fri Sep 13, 2024 10:14 am
Slick wrote: Fri Sep 13, 2024 9:45 am I said on another thread I'd been reading Ultra-Processed People by Dr Chris Van Tulleken. It's pretty good and very shocking.

But I got to a bit last night where he claimed that it doesn't matter how much exercise you do our bodies don't burn any more calories. So for a man it's about 2500 calories a day (or similar) and no matter what exercise you do, that's all our bodies will burn, so exercise is no good for weight loss. That seems mental
Does he mean we can't do more than 2,500 calories of work, or that exercise won't increase our base metabolism so we'll always burn the same for a given level of activity, regardless of fitness/muscle mass?
He's saying that our body burns 2500 calories a day whether we sit on our arse or go for a run. If we run we might burn more calories whilst running, but our body then cuts back on the calories it burns for the rest of the day, so there is no gain.
Seems like bollocks to me. I know when I was training for and running ultramarathons, I had to consciously eat more cake in order to maintain my weight.
User avatar
Uncle fester
Posts: 4919
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 9:42 pm

Biffer wrote: Fri Sep 13, 2024 10:00 am
Slick wrote: Fri Sep 13, 2024 9:45 am I said on another thread I'd been reading Ultra-Processed People by Dr Chris Van Tulleken. It's pretty good and very shocking.

But I got to a bit last night where he claimed that it doesn't matter how much exercise you do our bodies don't burn any more calories. So for a man it's about 2500 calories a day (or similar) and no matter what exercise you do, that's all our bodies will burn, so exercise is no good for weight loss. That seems mental
Sounds like pretty obvious bullshit
I'd well believe that a human body can adapt to differing demands and that humans are actually quite efficient at running so lots of running does not necessarily mean whippet like build but if you walk 5k every day, it's pretty unlikely you'll be obese.
User avatar
fishfoodie
Posts: 8728
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm

I know it's terrilble paternalistic, & probably misoginistic of me; but do others hope that one dark night, soon, Space Karen is walking down a dark alley, & he bumps into Travis ?


..
...
.....

and then Travis proceeds to hammer Karen into the ground like a fucking fence pole until only his hair remains above the surface.
Biffer
Posts: 10014
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 6:43 pm

epwc wrote: Fri Sep 13, 2024 3:10 pm Love this article:

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfr ... llionaires
I love the word arseoisie and I will use it in future
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
Biffer
Posts: 10014
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 6:43 pm

fishfoodie wrote: Fri Sep 13, 2024 4:59 pm I know it's terrilble paternalistic, & probably misoginistic of me; but do others hope that one dark night, soon, Space Karen is walking down a dark alley, & he bumps into Travis ?


..
...
.....

and then Travis proceeds to hammer Karen into the ground like a fucking fence pole until only his hair remains above the surface.
Never thought of Fran Healy as much of a fighter, but I suppose they're all weegies so they'll fuck him up.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
User avatar
fishfoodie
Posts: 8728
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm

Biffer wrote: Fri Sep 13, 2024 8:29 pm
fishfoodie wrote: Fri Sep 13, 2024 4:59 pm I know it's terrilble paternalistic, & probably misoginistic of me; but do others hope that one dark night, soon, Space Karen is walking down a dark alley, & he bumps into Travis ?


..
...
.....

and then Travis proceeds to hammer Karen into the ground like a fucking fence pole until only his hair remains above the surface.
Never thought of Fran Healy as much of a fighter, but I suppose they're all weegies so they'll fuck him up.
:grin:

Being regionally correct, the weegies could repeatedly chin him, or flying chin him into the ground
User avatar
Enzedder
Posts: 4008
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 6:55 pm
Location: Hamilton NZ

Word of the day - exhaustipated.

Anyone care to guess at the meaning?
I drink and I forget things.
duke
Posts: 793
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2020 6:54 am
Location: Smallsbury

Enzedder wrote: Fri Sep 13, 2024 10:57 pm Word of the day - exhaustipated.

Anyone care to guess at the meaning?
Too tired to give a shit
User avatar
fishfoodie
Posts: 8728
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm

These citizenship ceremonies happen regularly, & they always give me a lump in my throat.

It's really great that people are committed enough to their new Country to jump thru the hoops to become a full Citizen; the don't need to, they already have residency & can stay, but becoming a full citizen just enables them to vote in all elections, & gets them an Irish passport.

In Bundees case, he certainly didn't need to become a citizen, but he chose to !

We don't do too many things right in Ireland, but this part of our immigration/citizenship system we've done brilliantly

https://www.rte.ie/news/2024/0916/14702 ... eremonies/
User avatar
Niegs
Posts: 3690
Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2020 3:20 pm

Disgusting, hookers these days moving like this. At least Keith Wood still looked the part.

:lolno:

User avatar
Gumboot
Posts: 8711
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 9:17 am

duke wrote: Sat Sep 14, 2024 5:20 pm
Enzedder wrote: Fri Sep 13, 2024 10:57 pm Word of the day - exhaustipated.

Anyone care to guess at the meaning?
Too tired to give a shit
Too tired from straining to take a shit?
User avatar
Enzedder
Posts: 4008
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 6:55 pm
Location: Hamilton NZ

When posting, I had Duke's answer in mind. But yours is good too Gumboot.
I drink and I forget things.
User avatar
Uncle fester
Posts: 4919
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 9:42 pm

fishfoodie wrote: Thu Jun 22, 2023 4:44 pm
tabascoboy wrote: Thu Jun 22, 2023 4:33 pm
Blackmac wrote: Thu Jun 22, 2023 4:09 pm

I see they have found a debris field, so presumably a catastrophic implosion. The more you hear the back story of that death trap it has all the hallmarks of 5 ridiculously expensive Darwin Awards.
Unfortunately yes, it does appear that the tourists, presumably intelligent people, should have been very well aware of the risks involved but possibly swayed by false claims of safety and emergency action and recovery in the quest for adventure. From what I read, not a great deal is known about deep ocean currents so that if it becomes powerless in the depths it could drift almost anywhere, hence the near impossibility of locating it (especially when the comms seem to have been another part of the cowboy job).

It's going to get ugly for this company as I'm sure families of the victims won't just let this pass, and then you have the cost of the attempted search and recovery).

I know we supposed to be enthusiastic about "enterprise" but more and more it seems like this was a total disaster in waiting.
Unfortunately a lot of chancers, con men & outright thieves hide behind the entrepreneur label, & pretend that anyone who demands rigor is just an old fogey.

At the minimum, before I set foot inside this thing I would want to know what the actual crush depth was, because they'd sent one down 100, or 200x times & on the 223rd time it had failed, i.e. they tested the design to destruction the way real Engineers do.
Yeeb
Posts: 1504
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 12:06 pm

Niegs wrote: Thu Sep 19, 2024 3:37 am Disgusting, hookers these days moving like this. At least Keith Wood still looked the part.

:lolno:

Won’t lie, not the first …. Etc
Yeeb
Posts: 1504
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 12:06 pm

duke wrote: Sat Sep 14, 2024 5:20 pm
Enzedder wrote: Fri Sep 13, 2024 10:57 pm Word of the day - exhaustipated.

Anyone care to guess at the meaning?
Too tired to give a shit
That’s good

I like ‘reintarnation’ where you get reborn as a Hillbilly
User avatar
fishfoodie
Posts: 8728
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm

Uncle fester wrote: Thu Sep 19, 2024 8:14 am
fishfoodie wrote: Thu Jun 22, 2023 4:44 pm
tabascoboy wrote: Thu Jun 22, 2023 4:33 pm
Unfortunately yes, it does appear that the tourists, presumably intelligent people, should have been very well aware of the risks involved but possibly swayed by false claims of safety and emergency action and recovery in the quest for adventure. From what I read, not a great deal is known about deep ocean currents so that if it becomes powerless in the depths it could drift almost anywhere, hence the near impossibility of locating it (especially when the comms seem to have been another part of the cowboy job).

It's going to get ugly for this company as I'm sure families of the victims won't just let this pass, and then you have the cost of the attempted search and recovery).

I know we supposed to be enthusiastic about "enterprise" but more and more it seems like this was a total disaster in waiting.
Unfortunately a lot of chancers, con men & outright thieves hide behind the entrepreneur label, & pretend that anyone who demands rigor is just an old fogey.

At the minimum, before I set foot inside this thing I would want to know what the actual crush depth was, because they'd sent one down 100, or 200x times & on the 223rd time it had failed, i.e. they tested the design to destruction the way real Engineers do.
An insight for the rest of us into what a egotistical asshole Rush was !

This wasn't his first attempt at killing a bunch of paying passengers

User avatar
Uncle fester
Posts: 4919
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 9:42 pm

User avatar
Uncle fester
Posts: 4919
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 9:42 pm

I knew Neutrino from So Solid Crew had taken up rugby back in the noughties but didn't realize he was still playing.
London Cornish.
Plays at 8.
User avatar
fishfoodie
Posts: 8728
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm

Uncle fester wrote: Fri Sep 20, 2024 8:29 am I knew Neutrino from So Solid Crew had taken up rugby back in the noughties but didn't realize he was still playing.
London Cornish.
Plays at 8.
He must hard to tackle with a handle like that; difficult to predict, & very fast
Oxbow
Posts: 1492
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 12:45 pm

He'll just run straight through you.
Post Reply