Kinda boring tbhSlick wrote: Sat Nov 16, 2024 3:59 pm All a bit meh.
Hutchinson and Bayliss been good, TJ OK as well. Reed not being terribly impressive
The Official Scottish Rugby Thread
-
- Posts: 2091
- Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2020 9:53 am
-
- Posts: 3790
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 9:37 am
Hutchinson is such a class act. I appreciate Jones and Harris but it's such a shame he only has 7 caps.
-
- Posts: 2091
- Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2020 9:53 am
Agreed. I actually thought their yellow was a bit harsh too given we also got the PT. Surely one or the other is fairer?Slick wrote: Sat Nov 16, 2024 4:28 pm That’s a shit decision, so what if there is cover coming across, if it’s deliberate it’s a yellow- Darcy should have walked
- OomStruisbaai
- Posts: 15953
- Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2020 12:38 pm
- Location: Longest beach in SH
Good to see you lot critics about the ref. Usually don't happen when you winning.
Stick with us Oom, we’ll make you a better rugby manOomStruisbaai wrote: Sat Nov 16, 2024 4:43 pm Good to see you lot critics about the ref. Usually don't happen when you winning.
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
-
- Posts: 2091
- Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2020 9:53 am
Mostly because it was Jordan I think, first try chalked off is tough for him. Obviously the right call though.Blackmac wrote: Sat Nov 16, 2024 4:55 pm Murrayfield crowd booing the try getting chalked off for the most obvious forward pass of the match. FFS
KingBlairhorn wrote: Sat Nov 16, 2024 4:36 pmAgreed. I actually thought their yellow was a bit harsh too given we also got the PT. Surely one or the other is fairer?Slick wrote: Sat Nov 16, 2024 4:28 pm That’s a shit decision, so what if there is cover coming across, if it’s deliberate it’s a yellow- Darcy should have walked
For the last Portugal try which was chalked off, Graham is off his feet and out the game, but he played the ball with his feet - that's a penalty try for me
-
- Posts: 3790
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 9:37 am
He's over the try line so it's allowed I think.Tichtheid wrote: Sat Nov 16, 2024 5:05 pmKingBlairhorn wrote: Sat Nov 16, 2024 4:36 pmAgreed. I actually thought their yellow was a bit harsh too given we also got the PT. Surely one or the other is fairer?Slick wrote: Sat Nov 16, 2024 4:28 pm That’s a shit decision, so what if there is cover coming across, if it’s deliberate it’s a yellow- Darcy should have walked
For the last Portugal try which was chalked off, Graham is off his feet and out the game, but he played the ball with his feet - that's a penalty try for me
-
- Posts: 2091
- Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2020 9:53 am
Oh really, didn’t know that. I like it when a wee quirk of the laws I don’t know crops up.I like neeps wrote: Sat Nov 16, 2024 5:09 pmHe's over the try line so it's allowed I think.Tichtheid wrote: Sat Nov 16, 2024 5:05 pmKingBlairhorn wrote: Sat Nov 16, 2024 4:36 pm
Agreed. I actually thought their yellow was a bit harsh too given we also got the PT. Surely one or the other is fairer?
For the last Portugal try which was chalked off, Graham is off his feet and out the game, but he played the ball with his feet - that's a penalty try for me
Think Kinghorn has enough in the bank to keep his place but he’ll have to be good KinghornTichtheid wrote: Sat Nov 16, 2024 5:06 pm Jordan had another stormer - it will be a tough call whether to start him or Kinghorn at fullback next week.
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
Penalty try must be a yellow if the ref can identify someone causing it.KingBlairhorn wrote: Sat Nov 16, 2024 4:36 pmAgreed. I actually thought their yellow was a bit harsh too given we also got the PT. Surely one or the other is fairer?Slick wrote: Sat Nov 16, 2024 4:28 pm That’s a shit decision, so what if there is cover coming across, if it’s deliberate it’s a yellow- Darcy should have walked
KingBlairhorn wrote: Sat Nov 16, 2024 5:10 pmOh really, didn’t know that. I like it when a wee quirk of the laws I don’t know crops up.I like neeps wrote: Sat Nov 16, 2024 5:09 pmHe's over the try line so it's allowed I think.Tichtheid wrote: Sat Nov 16, 2024 5:05 pm
For the last Portugal try which was chalked off, Graham is off his feet and out the game, but he played the ball with his feet - that's a penalty try for me
I've only been playing and watching for 50 years. I'm not quite au fait with all the laws in rugby yet
Probably, Jordan is the perfect kind of player to have on the pine, too - he can play three positions
Thought it was pretty poor.
Tight 5 mostly average at best.
Back row went well.
Half backs offered little control to the point Horne should be behind Dobie as Whites back up.
Centres were OK and TJ was good at 15.
I wouldn't change the XV from the SA game.
Tight 5 mostly average at best.
Back row went well.
Half backs offered little control to the point Horne should be behind Dobie as Whites back up.
Centres were OK and TJ was good at 15.
I wouldn't change the XV from the SA game.
Talking of laws you didn’t know..Big D wrote: Sat Nov 16, 2024 5:11 pmPenalty try must be a yellow if the ref can identify someone causing it.KingBlairhorn wrote: Sat Nov 16, 2024 4:36 pmAgreed. I actually thought their yellow was a bit harsh too given we also got the PT. Surely one or the other is fairer?Slick wrote: Sat Nov 16, 2024 4:28 pm That’s a shit decision, so what if there is cover coming across, if it’s deliberate it’s a yellow- Darcy should have walked
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
People are sounding down about this match, and there are clearly things that could have been done better... but have a look at all of Portugal's tier 1 matches over the last year or so and tell me that doesn't rank high among them... with effectively a Scotland 2nd XV.
Wouldn't fight against it if he was.
I don't think there's many wrong choices in the back three but didn't think the back 3 were too bad last week and didn't think Darcy was pretty average tonight.
-
- Posts: 3790
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 9:37 am
I think he's allowed to because how often do you see players go off their feet straight to ground to try and hold up a player in the in goal and it's never given as a penalty.Tichtheid wrote: Sat Nov 16, 2024 5:12 pmKingBlairhorn wrote: Sat Nov 16, 2024 5:10 pmOh really, didn’t know that. I like it when a wee quirk of the laws I don’t know crops up.
I've only been playing and watching for 50 years. I'm not quite au fait with all the laws in rugby yet
Not 100% sure.
-
- Posts: 3790
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 9:37 am
I thought that Bayliss, Hutchinson and Jordan were all head and shoulders the best players on the pitch. Would have them all involved next week likely on the bench.Big D wrote: Sat Nov 16, 2024 5:16 pm Thought it was pretty poor.
Tight 5 mostly average at best.
Back row went well.
Half backs offered little control to the point Horne should be behind Dobie as Whites back up.
Centres were OK and TJ was good at 15.
I wouldn't change the XV from the SA game.
I think guys like Horne and Matthews showed why they're unfancied.
There's no offside line behind the try line but it does get a bit wild with off feet etc.I like neeps wrote: Sat Nov 16, 2024 5:36 pmI think he's allowed to because how often do you see players go off their feet straight to ground to try and hold up a player in the in goal and it's never given as a penalty.Tichtheid wrote: Sat Nov 16, 2024 5:12 pmKingBlairhorn wrote: Sat Nov 16, 2024 5:10 pm
Oh really, didn’t know that. I like it when a wee quirk of the laws I don’t know crops up.
I've only been playing and watching for 50 years. I'm not quite au fait with all the laws in rugby yet
Not 100% sure.
Sigh. Just once I wish we would post a big win v a Tier 2 opponent without a bunch of caveats attached. Every time we play one of these games we run up a big score and a bunch of tries, but there’s always a ‘yes, but’ or five. I guess it just isn’t Scottish enough to ever put in a complete performance. Today it’s the lineout everyone’s talking about.
Having said that, a good run-out for our 2nd XV plus Darcy. Good to know we have decent cover in most positions.
Having said that, a good run-out for our 2nd XV plus Darcy. Good to know we have decent cover in most positions.
It is in truth not for glory, nor riches, nor honours that we are fighting, but for freedom - for that alone, which no honest man gives up but with life itself.
Since August last year:
Por 46 - 10 USA
Wal 28 - 8 Por
Geo 18-18 Por
Aus 34-14 Por
Fiji 23-24 Por
Nam 22-37 Por
SA 64-21 Por
Por 17-21 USA
Sco 59-21 Por
Whatever our concerns about that (unofficially) Scotland A performance, only SA's result against Portugal is in the same ballpark.
Por 46 - 10 USA
Wal 28 - 8 Por
Geo 18-18 Por
Aus 34-14 Por
Fiji 23-24 Por
Nam 22-37 Por
SA 64-21 Por
Por 17-21 USA
Sco 59-21 Por
Whatever our concerns about that (unofficially) Scotland A performance, only SA's result against Portugal is in the same ballpark.
-
- Posts: 3790
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 9:37 am
The commentators were saying its a very different Portuguese team, a lot of new players since the world cup. Not sure we're comparing applies and pears here.charltom wrote: Sat Nov 16, 2024 6:23 pm Since August last year:
Por 46 - 10 USA
Wal 28 - 8 Por
Geo 18-18 Por
Aus 34-14 Por
Fiji 23-24 Por
Nam 22-37 Por
SA 64-21 Por
Por 17-21 USA
Sco 59-21 Por
Whatever our concerns about that (unofficially) Scotland A performance, only SA's result against Portugal is in the same ballpark.
I like neeps wrote: Sat Nov 16, 2024 6:26 pmThe commentators were saying its a very different Portuguese team, a lot of new players since the world cup. Not sure we're comparing applies and pears here.charltom wrote: Sat Nov 16, 2024 6:23 pm Since August last year:
Por 46 - 10 USA
Wal 28 - 8 Por
Geo 18-18 Por
Aus 34-14 Por
Fiji 23-24 Por
Nam 22-37 Por
SA 64-21 Por
Por 17-21 USA
Sco 59-21 Por
Whatever our concerns about that (unofficially) Scotland A performance, only SA's result against Portugal is in the same ballpark.
The other side of that is that Graham is the only starter from this week that will start next week. Sutherland, Bayliss and Dobie will probably be in next week's 23, perhaps McDowall too.
Having said that, I was just thinking that Jordan's performance may knock McDowall out of the 23 if Toonie goes with Kinghorn to start.
The SA match was this summer, and featured more first team players for SA than Scotland did.I like neeps wrote: Sat Nov 16, 2024 6:26 pmThe commentators were saying its a very different Portuguese team, a lot of new players since the world cup. Not sure we're comparing applies and pears here.charltom wrote: Sat Nov 16, 2024 6:23 pm Since August last year:
Por 46 - 10 USA
Wal 28 - 8 Por
Geo 18-18 Por
Aus 34-14 Por
Fiji 23-24 Por
Nam 22-37 Por
SA 64-21 Por
Por 17-21 USA
Sco 59-21 Por
Whatever our concerns about that (unofficially) Scotland A performance, only SA's result against Portugal is in the same ballpark.
I was a Nairn fan, but I felt he suffered a lot (as did McDowall) under Rennie. Being a bit part player in unsettled teams during international breaks.KingBlairhorn wrote: Fri Nov 15, 2024 12:12 pmYou've got to wonder how the SRU failed to make someone like Robbie Nairn (who was perhaps slightly less powerful but probably faster) into an international player when they did so much great work with Duhan.dpedin wrote: Fri Nov 15, 2024 10:22 amDuhan was very much a work in progress in his early days at Edinburgh - his first 6 months were spent in the operating theatre and in rehab. When he eventually came onto the pitch he couldn't catch a high ball properly, his kicking was woeful and defensively he was all over the place. What he could do was run with ball in hand but even then he often ran across the pitch rather than straight. Ball retention in the tackle and knowing when/how to pass was poor. Arguably he still has some of these weaknesses? Edinburgh worked hard with him to transform him from a big man good at running with the ball into a more rounded top class international winger.I like neeps wrote: Fri Nov 15, 2024 9:02 am
Cockers deserves a lot of credit for his work at Edinburgh pre covid and yes taking a punt on duhan is one of those points but he didn't really learn his rugby in Scotland. He was unbelievable from day1.
I think Tom Jordan playing super6 you can suggest he was a good player in the best team and had consistent coaching and improvement.
You and me both, but I think once it's over the line you can pretty much do whatever the fuck you want.Tichtheid wrote: Sat Nov 16, 2024 5:12 pmKingBlairhorn wrote: Sat Nov 16, 2024 5:10 pmOh really, didn’t know that. I like it when a wee quirk of the laws I don’t know crops up.
I've only been playing and watching for 50 years. I'm not quite au fait with all the laws in rugby yet
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
-
- Posts: 371
- Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2020 11:22 pm
Law 13.3:Biffer wrote: Sat Nov 16, 2024 11:07 pmYou and me both, but I think once it's over the line you can pretty much do whatever the fuck you want.Tichtheid wrote: Sat Nov 16, 2024 5:12 pmKingBlairhorn wrote: Sat Nov 16, 2024 5:10 pm
Oh really, didn’t know that. I like it when a wee quirk of the laws I don’t know crops up.
I've only been playing and watching for 50 years. I'm not quite au fait with all the laws in rugby yet
"A player on the ground in the field of play, without the ball is out of the game"
The field of play extends between the two goal lines but does not include the in goal areas.
I'm taking that as confirmation of my opinion.topofthemoon wrote: Sat Nov 16, 2024 11:25 pmLaw 13.3:
"A player on the ground in the field of play, without the ball is out of the game"
The field of play extends between the two goal lines but does not include the in goal areas.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
-
- Posts: 371
- Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2020 11:22 pm
I'd be happy to get behind your wording being added the next time the law book is updated!Biffer wrote: Sat Nov 16, 2024 11:29 pmI'm taking that as confirmation of my opinion.topofthemoon wrote: Sat Nov 16, 2024 11:25 pmLaw 13.3:Biffer wrote: Sat Nov 16, 2024 11:07 pm
You and me both, but I think once it's over the line you can pretty much do whatever the fuck you want.
"A player on the ground in the field of play, without the ball is out of the game"
The field of play extends between the two goal lines but does not include the in goal areas.
Next week's teams (if it were me, not GT):
SCOTLAND vs. Australia
Schoeman Ashman ZFagerson Cummings Gilchrist Crosbie Darge MFagerson
Dobie Russell Kinghorn STuipulotu Jones Graham Jordan
(Sutherland Richardson Rae Craig Bayliss White Hutchinson vdMerwe)
SCOTLAND A vs. Chile
Bhatti Harrison Hurd Samuel Johnson Bradbury Douglas Muncaster
Horne Hastings Reed McDowall Currie Rowe Paterson
(Hepburn Matthews Millar-Mills Brown Watson Price MTuipulotu)
Injured/out:
McBeth RSmith Walker Williamson JGray Christie Boyle Dempsey
Afshar Thompson Steyn Redpath Harris Hoyland OSmith
(Kebble Cherry Sebastian Sykes Ferrie Warr Healy Lang)
I'm sure I've forgotten someone/something; but Williamson, Gray, Christie, Dempsey, Steyn and Redpath could add a lot of extra quality in the 6N or later.
It really felt like Jordan was being tried out today as a potential ongoing 15. The alternative of course would be White and DvdM starting, Kinghorn at FB and Dobie and Jordan being the 2 on a 6/2 split bench.
Will be interesting to see what teams GT opts for.
SCOTLAND vs. Australia
Schoeman Ashman ZFagerson Cummings Gilchrist Crosbie Darge MFagerson
Dobie Russell Kinghorn STuipulotu Jones Graham Jordan
(Sutherland Richardson Rae Craig Bayliss White Hutchinson vdMerwe)
SCOTLAND A vs. Chile
Bhatti Harrison Hurd Samuel Johnson Bradbury Douglas Muncaster
Horne Hastings Reed McDowall Currie Rowe Paterson
(Hepburn Matthews Millar-Mills Brown Watson Price MTuipulotu)
Injured/out:
McBeth RSmith Walker Williamson JGray Christie Boyle Dempsey
Afshar Thompson Steyn Redpath Harris Hoyland OSmith
(Kebble Cherry Sebastian Sykes Ferrie Warr Healy Lang)
I'm sure I've forgotten someone/something; but Williamson, Gray, Christie, Dempsey, Steyn and Redpath could add a lot of extra quality in the 6N or later.
It really felt like Jordan was being tried out today as a potential ongoing 15. The alternative of course would be White and DvdM starting, Kinghorn at FB and Dobie and Jordan being the 2 on a 6/2 split bench.
Will be interesting to see what teams GT opts for.
I see Italy are losing to Georgia. I am more convinced than ever that we are Italy’s big game every year. They almost always turn up against us in a way they frequently don’t against other sides, England in particular. I know why this is, but it’s frustrating that we essentially play a different and tougher Italy than the other 6N teams.
It is in truth not for glory, nor riches, nor honours that we are fighting, but for freedom - for that alone, which no honest man gives up but with life itself.
I'm sure England would say the same for us.Yr Alban wrote: Sun Nov 17, 2024 3:01 pm I see Italy are losing to Georgia. I am more convinced than ever that we are Italy’s big game every year. They almost always turn up against us in a way they frequently don’t against other sides, England in particular. I know why this is, but it’s frustrating that we essentially play a different and tougher Italy than the other 6N teams.
In recent years, that’s a fair point.Big D wrote: Sun Nov 17, 2024 3:26 pmI'm sure England would say the same for us.Yr Alban wrote: Sun Nov 17, 2024 3:01 pm I see Italy are losing to Georgia. I am more convinced than ever that we are Italy’s big game every year. They almost always turn up against us in a way they frequently don’t against other sides, England in particular. I know why this is, but it’s frustrating that we essentially play a different and tougher Italy than the other 6N teams.
I have a slight fear that when we actually lose a game to England (has to happen eventually) that result will end up costing us a title.
It is in truth not for glory, nor riches, nor honours that we are fighting, but for freedom - for that alone, which no honest man gives up but with life itself.