NASA personnel were told to “drop everything” to scrub public sites of mentions of DEI, indigenous people, environmental justice, and women in leadership, according to a directive obtained by 404 Media.
The directive, sent on January 22 and obtained by 404 Media, states:
“Per NASA HQ direction, we are required to scrub mentions of the following terms from our public sites by 5pm ET today. This is a drop everything and reprioritize your day request. Note that the list below is the list that exists this morning, but it may grow as the day goes on.
DEIA
Diversity (in context of DEIA)
Equity (“ “)
Inclusion (“ “)
Accessibility (“ “)
MSI
Minority Serving Institution
Indigenous People
EEJ
EJ
Environmental Justice
Underrepresented groups/people
Anything specifically targeting women (women in leadership, etc.)”
President Trump and US politics catchall
https://www.404media.co/nasa-dei-drop-e ... ive-order/
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
- Hal Jordan
- Posts: 4427
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 12:48 pm
- Location: Sector 2814
Just another normal day in normal democracy world.
This must be great news for China (Chynaah!) who can now swoop in and be seen as heroes?
- Hal Jordan
- Posts: 4427
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 12:48 pm
- Location: Sector 2814
We're definitely in the Decline of An Empire stage as far as the US is concerned. China will take over in the same way we were the power in the 19th Century, and were superseded by America in the 20th.
- Guy Smiley
- Posts: 6341
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:52 pm
In slightly related news....
https://www.1news.co.nz/2025/02/05/cook ... -surprise/
-
- Posts: 3730
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 9:37 am
It would be a surprise if China stepped into the Usaid vacuum.
Much like Trump, China is purely focused on trade and commerce. They aren't going to step into health funding etc.
Certainly not an unreasonable perspective. The concern I would have is places like Iran and how they may react, as introducing a heavy US military presence in Gaza would not be looked upon fondly. They aren't going to give two fucks about the Gazans, I agree, but does it trigger new issues between them and Israel, or do they funnel more stuff to Hamas/Hezbollah/Houthis (they clearly have a naming pattern for their terrorist groups...)?Yeeb wrote: ↑Wed Feb 05, 2025 7:45 amActually, contrarian thinking here, but it could be exactly what Gaza needs:
Present and recent situation suits neither Palestinians or Israel
Emnity will continue
Killings will continue
Nearby Islamic (not Egypt which has) states will continue to take almost no displaced of refugees of their faith when they can scrounge benefits in uk / Germany / Sweden etc
USA will continue to ship arms and military to the region anyways
Having USA acting as policeman / buffer in Gaza to sort out the emnity between one lot of pork dodgers and another , and give them yet another airbase in the area , could put a damper on all the killings. USA owning Gaza won’t sit well with his earlier proclamation that all Palestinians should go to Egypt temp basis as Gaza is currently a demolished building site , but joined up thinking & not contradicting himself has never been a trump strong point
Appreciate it's all speculation and "what if..." thinking, but it doesn't feel that far fetched?
They may look at easy wins though, like funding demining etc. Pocket change for them, but allows then to crow to the smaller countries and islands in the Pacific etc about how they'd help "look after them".I like neeps wrote: ↑Wed Feb 05, 2025 9:57 amIt would be a surprise if China stepped into the Usaid vacuum.
Much like Trump, China is purely focused on trade and commerce. They aren't going to step into health funding etc.
Want to borrow my tin foil hat ... you might need it!Yeeb wrote: ↑Mon Feb 03, 2025 10:49 amNah, that’s verging on tin foil hat, sorry - there is plenty Trump & the people who voted for him see as broken , and lumping (short term?) tariffs on those he has a surplus of flows with is a direct method of him solving those issues.dpedin wrote: ↑Mon Feb 03, 2025 10:35 amThey aren't trying to fix anything that's the point, these are all just jumped up excuses to put in place tariffs to create friction. All they want to do is to create chaos and mayhem and break down what they regard as the deep state and the establishment! The creation and forthcoming 'battles' against their neighbors and allies is just to create a smokescreen for them to create anger and chaos amongst the population - these bad folk over there are putting your prices up! They see this as a necessary step towards creating the new 'Information Age'. They are trying to completely break the US state laws, structures and mechanisms and make the final step to where private companies provide services, but only those that people are prepared to pay for and are profitable, and the country is run by a group of oligarchs who hide their fortunes away using digital currencies and dont pay taxes to anyone. As a Rothschild banker said, 'The best time to buy is when blood is running in the streets.'Yeeb wrote: ↑Mon Feb 03, 2025 8:11 am
I think he’s lumped those together at the start purely as they fall under the drugs pretext. Eu clearly in next wave but that excuse won’t work so he’s just used their don’t buy from us speil.
And as I had hoped and semi predicted with that madman , UK plc is off the hook for now, which could be a side benefit of Brexit but more likely because we have the surplus with them not other way around , and he’s got bigger fish to fry. Only a fool would be complacent, but is Starmer that fool ?
His stuff about Greenland, Gulf of Mexico - yes, deffo smoke and mirrors. Direct tariffs ? Nah
-
- Posts: 9013
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 11:48 am
I actually do think that trying to maintain both Gaza and the West Bank is doomed to failure. Palestine needs to exist as one land mass and creating that landmass will involve redrawing existing borders. Enmity and killings aren't going away no matter what anyone does.Yeeb wrote: ↑Wed Feb 05, 2025 7:45 amActually, contrarian thinking here, but it could be exactly what Gaza needs:
Present and recent situation suits neither Palestinians or Israel
Emnity will continue
Killings will continue
Nearby Islamic (not Egypt which has) states will continue to take almost no displaced of refugees of their faith when they can scrounge benefits in uk / Germany / Sweden etc
USA will continue to ship arms and military to the region anyways
Having USA acting as policeman / buffer in Gaza to sort out the emnity between one lot of pork dodgers and another , and give them yet another airbase in the area , could put a damper on all the killings. USA owning Gaza won’t sit well with his earlier proclamation that all Palestinians should go to Egypt temp basis as Gaza is currently a demolished building site , but joined up thinking & not contradicting himself has never been a trump strong point
However, there is exactly zero trust in a Trump admin to get anything useful done on this issue. Notwithstanding that even the MAGA base are likely to baulk at US troops being sent anywhere given a not insignificant part of Trump's rhetoric over the years has been about bringing troops home and not being involved overseas, he and his family have openly spoken about Gaza being good beach front property. They're not interested in preservation of life or helping to establish statehood, they're on the make (as usual).
Nah. Your vote has to be earned. People who felt strongly about Gaza rightly refused to vote for "their" party for that reason. The alternative might be worse, but that doesn't mean you throw your weight behind the shitty option placed in front of you.sturginho wrote: ↑Wed Feb 05, 2025 7:42 amAnyone who didn't vote, or voted against Harris because of Gaza is an absolute dribbling moron, but here we are. I guess they're acting all outraged nowKiwias wrote: ↑Wed Feb 05, 2025 1:02 am This will go down well with the Palestinians who voted for Trump because Biden/Harris ...whatever.
Trump speaking about Gaza after his meeting with Netanyahu:
Everybody I’ve spoken to loves the idea of the United States owning that piece of land, developing and creating thousands of jobs with something that will be magnificent.”![]()
As someone pointed out, the Democrats were far more prepared to shut down campus protests with extreme prejudice than they are to deal with Trump's assault on their own government.
I agree, it’s not China’s style.I like neeps wrote: ↑Wed Feb 05, 2025 9:57 amIt would be a surprise if China stepped into the Usaid vacuum.
Much like Trump, China is purely focused on trade and commerce. They aren't going to step into health funding etc.
But the US is still reducing the influence the exerted via soft power while China are increasing there’s via trade, building infrastructure.
It’s a very young country with a very young population so who know how their perceptions might change.
- Uncle fester
- Posts: 4623
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 9:42 pm
I don't believe for a second that trump is serious about putting US troops there. They'll "subcontract" that to the IDF.sockwithaticket wrote: ↑Wed Feb 05, 2025 10:21 amI actually do think that trying to maintain both Gaza and the West Bank is doomed to failure. Palestine needs to exist as one land mass and creating that landmass will involve redrawing existing borders. Enmity and killings aren't going away no matter what anyone does.Yeeb wrote: ↑Wed Feb 05, 2025 7:45 amActually, contrarian thinking here, but it could be exactly what Gaza needs:
Present and recent situation suits neither Palestinians or Israel
Emnity will continue
Killings will continue
Nearby Islamic (not Egypt which has) states will continue to take almost no displaced of refugees of their faith when they can scrounge benefits in uk / Germany / Sweden etc
USA will continue to ship arms and military to the region anyways
Having USA acting as policeman / buffer in Gaza to sort out the emnity between one lot of pork dodgers and another , and give them yet another airbase in the area , could put a damper on all the killings. USA owning Gaza won’t sit well with his earlier proclamation that all Palestinians should go to Egypt temp basis as Gaza is currently a demolished building site , but joined up thinking & not contradicting himself has never been a trump strong point
However, there is exactly zero trust in a Trump admin to get anything useful done on this issue. Notwithstanding that even the MAGA base are likely to baulk at US troops being sent anywhere given a not insignificant part of Trump's rhetoric over the years has been about bringing troops home and not being involved overseas, he and his family have openly spoken about Gaza being good beach front property. They're not interested in preservation of life or helping to establish statehood, they're on the make (as usual).
To me, this is the major mistake people make in the USA in their view on China. China is a competitor. Russia is an enemy. These are not the same thing.I like neeps wrote: ↑Wed Feb 05, 2025 9:57 amIt would be a surprise if China stepped into the Usaid vacuum.
Much like Trump, China is purely focused on trade and commerce. They aren't going to step into health funding etc.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
Jeff Bezos getting his return for backing Trump and neutering WaPo
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c3w83x38zvwo
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c3w83x38zvwo
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
-
- Posts: 3730
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 9:37 am
It's just not their MO.geordie_6 wrote: ↑Wed Feb 05, 2025 10:13 amThey may look at easy wins though, like funding demining etc. Pocket change for them, but allows then to crow to the smaller countries and islands in the Pacific etc about how they'd help "look after them".I like neeps wrote: ↑Wed Feb 05, 2025 9:57 amIt would be a surprise if China stepped into the Usaid vacuum.
Much like Trump, China is purely focused on trade and commerce. They aren't going to step into health funding etc.
China's interest in emerging markets is ultimately building large projects that supply them with raw materials/get young men out of China and building massive projects for years somewhere/massive contracts for Chinese manufacturers.
If Chinese companies and Chinese citizens aren't involved in their soft power projects they just aren't interested in them.
Actually, I can definitely see China stepping into any hole left by USAID, it's a relatively cheap and easy win in countries that are already having a little look that way.Sinkers wrote: ↑Wed Feb 05, 2025 10:40 amI agree, it’s not China’s style.I like neeps wrote: ↑Wed Feb 05, 2025 9:57 amIt would be a surprise if China stepped into the Usaid vacuum.
Much like Trump, China is purely focused on trade and commerce. They aren't going to step into health funding etc.
But the US is still reducing the influence the exerted via soft power while China are increasing there’s via trade, building infrastructure.
It’s a very young country with a very young population so who know how their perceptions might change.
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
- Hal Jordan
- Posts: 4427
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 12:48 pm
- Location: Sector 2814
Given that 90% of the stuff that comes up on an Amazon search seems to be weird branded Chinese shit these days, I suspect it might be an issue.Biffer wrote: ↑Wed Feb 05, 2025 11:35 am Jeff Bezos getting his return for backing Trump and neutering WaPo
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c3w83x38zvwo
Far bigger effect on Amazon competitors like Temu.Hal Jordan wrote: ↑Wed Feb 05, 2025 1:09 pmGiven that 90% of the stuff that comes up on an Amazon search seems to be weird branded Chinese shit these days, I suspect it might be an issue.Biffer wrote: ↑Wed Feb 05, 2025 11:35 am Jeff Bezos getting his return for backing Trump and neutering WaPo
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c3w83x38zvwo
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
- Hal Jordan
- Posts: 4427
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 12:48 pm
- Location: Sector 2814
If you're buying the tat that Temu ships, cutting you off from the supply is probably in the nature of an intervention.
-
- Posts: 3398
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 7:37 am
What's another one, eh.
BUT DID YOU KNOW THIS TOOL SET IS £0!!!!!!!Hal Jordan wrote: ↑Wed Feb 05, 2025 3:53 pm If you're buying the tat that Temu ships, cutting you off from the supply is probably in the nature of an intervention.
EDIT: sorry I've just seen that bloody ad so many times
Yep, the American voters decided that he's above the law. They're tired of that "all men are created equal" bollocks in the Declaration of Independence and want a criminal dictator to dry-fuck them silly till the price of eggs comes down. It's a lifestyle choice.
We are all several steps nearer to needing lead overcoats not tin foil hats.dpedin wrote: ↑Wed Feb 05, 2025 10:19 amWant to borrow my tin foil hat ... you might need it!Yeeb wrote: ↑Mon Feb 03, 2025 10:49 amNah, that’s verging on tin foil hat, sorry - there is plenty Trump & the people who voted for him see as broken , and lumping (short term?) tariffs on those he has a surplus of flows with is a direct method of him solving those issues.dpedin wrote: ↑Mon Feb 03, 2025 10:35 am
They aren't trying to fix anything that's the point, these are all just jumped up excuses to put in place tariffs to create friction. All they want to do is to create chaos and mayhem and break down what they regard as the deep state and the establishment! The creation and forthcoming 'battles' against their neighbors and allies is just to create a smokescreen for them to create anger and chaos amongst the population - these bad folk over there are putting your prices up! They see this as a necessary step towards creating the new 'Information Age'. They are trying to completely break the US state laws, structures and mechanisms and make the final step to where private companies provide services, but only those that people are prepared to pay for and are profitable, and the country is run by a group of oligarchs who hide their fortunes away using digital currencies and dont pay taxes to anyone. As a Rothschild banker said, 'The best time to buy is when blood is running in the streets.'
His stuff about Greenland, Gulf of Mexico - yes, deffo smoke and mirrors. Direct tariffs ? Nah
Not implausible:
Next atrocity elicits knee jerk over reaction
US invades Gaza
Rest of world does fuck all / nukes within 30 mins 80% 20% chance
Lefties still blame thatcher
- Guy Smiley
- Posts: 6341
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:52 pm
I watched a clip yesterday of Jon Stewart and AOC chatting online and talking about where the Dems fall short. AOC made the point that people aren't stupid and see the blatant hypocrisy that rules the House, specifically the insider trading that goes on. Stewart paraphrased it as regulating the market you trade in. Their take is that unless there's a massive reset within the Dems there's little chance of winning votes back.Gumboot wrote: ↑Wed Feb 05, 2025 6:21 pmYep, the American voters decided that he's above the law. They're tired of that "all men are created equal" bollocks in the Declaration of Independence and want a criminal dictator to dry-fuck them silly till the price of eggs comes down. It's a lifestyle choice.
- Uncle fester
- Posts: 4623
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 9:42 pm
Two party system is essentially a one party system at the moment as the Democrats have been browbeaten into being a pale imitation of the Republicans.Guy Smiley wrote: ↑Wed Feb 05, 2025 6:38 pmI watched a clip yesterday of Jon Stewart and AOC chatting online and talking about where the Dems fall short. AOC made the point that people aren't stupid and see the blatant hypocrisy that rules the House, specifically the insider trading that goes on. Stewart paraphrased it as regulating the market you trade in. Their take is that unless there's a massive reset within the Dems there's little chance of winning votes back.Gumboot wrote: ↑Wed Feb 05, 2025 6:21 pmYep, the American voters decided that he's above the law. They're tired of that "all men are created equal" bollocks in the Declaration of Independence and want a criminal dictator to dry-fuck them silly till the price of eggs comes down. It's a lifestyle choice.
That's true but it does let the Democrats off the hook imo.Uncle fester wrote: ↑Wed Feb 05, 2025 6:51 pmTwo party system is essentially a one party system at the moment as the Democrats have been browbeaten into being a pale imitation of the Republicans.Guy Smiley wrote: ↑Wed Feb 05, 2025 6:38 pmI watched a clip yesterday of Jon Stewart and AOC chatting online and talking about where the Dems fall short. AOC made the point that people aren't stupid and see the blatant hypocrisy that rules the House, specifically the insider trading that goes on. Stewart paraphrased it as regulating the market you trade in. Their take is that unless there's a massive reset within the Dems there's little chance of winning votes back.Gumboot wrote: ↑Wed Feb 05, 2025 6:21 pm
Yep, the American voters decided that he's above the law. They're tired of that "all men are created equal" bollocks in the Declaration of Independence and want a criminal dictator to dry-fuck them silly till the price of eggs comes down. It's a lifestyle choice.
They give Republicans and Trumpists so many open goals. When people like Pelosi have been around forever, are worth a fortune and are totally out of touch with working class voters and young voters it is much easier to sway those people.
- Uncle fester
- Posts: 4623
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 9:42 pm
The closest they've had to a "real ordinary American" in recent times was Clinton and they resolved to never let that happen again.Hugo wrote: ↑Wed Feb 05, 2025 7:09 pmThat's true but it does let the Democrats off the hook imo.Uncle fester wrote: ↑Wed Feb 05, 2025 6:51 pmTwo party system is essentially a one party system at the moment as the Democrats have been browbeaten into being a pale imitation of the Republicans.Guy Smiley wrote: ↑Wed Feb 05, 2025 6:38 pm
I watched a clip yesterday of Jon Stewart and AOC chatting online and talking about where the Dems fall short. AOC made the point that people aren't stupid and see the blatant hypocrisy that rules the House, specifically the insider trading that goes on. Stewart paraphrased it as regulating the market you trade in. Their take is that unless there's a massive reset within the Dems there's little chance of winning votes back.
They give Republicans and Trumpists so many open goals. When people like Pelosi have been around forever, are worth a fortune and are totally out of touch with working class voters and young voters it is much easier to sway those people.
Dems missed the boat by not picking Sanders or Warren.
- Uncle fester
- Posts: 4623
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 9:42 pm
-
- Posts: 9013
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 11:48 am
So it transpires that USAid, the department Musk made a beeline to shut down with his little techbro gremlins, was investigating Starlink in relation to its Ukraine activity.
But don't worry, according to some, an appointee in a previously non-existent position swooping in to stop a department from investigating one of their companies is totally not a threat to democracy.
But don't worry, according to some, an appointee in a previously non-existent position swooping in to stop a department from investigating one of their companies is totally not a threat to democracy.
It doesn’t even mention how relatively small the US spending is as a proportion of its gdp (it’s about 35%, far less than other g7 countries).
The US is far from alone from creating tax loopholes that are designed by the elites (or close relatives of elites ruling class) - something I was pretty close to was the German cum ex scandal which is worth a google as it’s not dissimilar (fairly sure most on here already have ‘German cum’ in their search history)
You joke, but many of them did exactly that. Apart from the dry-fuck bit, I thinkGumboot wrote: ↑Wed Feb 05, 2025 6:21 pmYep, the American voters decided that he's above the law. They're tired of that "all men are created equal" bollocks in the Declaration of Independence and want a criminal dictator to dry-fuck them silly till the price of eggs comes down. It's a lifestyle choice.
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
PB says it is so it must be. You’re just being a sulky lefty.sockwithaticket wrote: ↑Wed Feb 05, 2025 8:52 pm So it transpires that USAid, the department Musk made a beeline to shut down with his little techbro gremlins, was investigating Starlink in relation to its Ukraine activity.
But don't worry, according to some, an appointee in a previously non-existent position swooping in to stop a department from investigating one of their companies is totally not a threat to democracy.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
Goes back to my Gen x point.Hugo wrote: ↑Wed Feb 05, 2025 7:09 pmThat's true but it does let the Democrats off the hook imo.Uncle fester wrote: ↑Wed Feb 05, 2025 6:51 pmTwo party system is essentially a one party system at the moment as the Democrats have been browbeaten into being a pale imitation of the Republicans.Guy Smiley wrote: ↑Wed Feb 05, 2025 6:38 pm
I watched a clip yesterday of Jon Stewart and AOC chatting online and talking about where the Dems fall short. AOC made the point that people aren't stupid and see the blatant hypocrisy that rules the House, specifically the insider trading that goes on. Stewart paraphrased it as regulating the market you trade in. Their take is that unless there's a massive reset within the Dems there's little chance of winning votes back.
They give Republicans and Trumpists so many open goals. When people like Pelosi have been around forever, are worth a fortune and are totally out of touch with working class voters and young voters it is much easier to sway those people.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
I'm no 'law talkin' guy' but Mark Cuban shared this on bsky as all the lawsuits related to Executive Orders, the host promising to have it better sorted in the next few days.
https://www.courtwatch.news/p/lawsuits- ... ive-orders
https://www.courtwatch.news/p/lawsuits- ... ive-orders
- Uncle fester
- Posts: 4623
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 9:42 pm
Indicative of what a bunch of punching down cünts they are.Yeeb wrote: ↑Wed Feb 05, 2025 8:56 pmIt doesn’t even mention how relatively small the US spending is as a proportion of its gdp (it’s about 35%, far less than other g7 countries).
The US is far from alone from creating tax loopholes that are designed by the elites (or close relatives of elites ruling class) - something I was pretty close to was the German cum ex scandal which is worth a google as it’s not dissimilar (fairly sure most on here already have ‘German cum’ in their search history)