The Official Scottish Rugby Thread
-
- Posts: 1245
- Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2020 4:35 pm
Dependent on offer may be in Edinburgh for a while, working in Gogar.
Amateur wise, any clubs to avoid? Unfamiliar with the club scene. Will probably base myself west way.
Amateur wise, any clubs to avoid? Unfamiliar with the club scene. Will probably base myself west way.
To be honest I've never heard of any rugby clubs that should be avoided.TheNatalShark wrote: ↑Tue Feb 11, 2025 7:12 pm Dependent on offer may be in Edinburgh for a while, working in Gogar.
Amateur wise, any clubs to avoid? Unfamiliar with the club scene. Will probably base myself west way.
Around that area is Boroughmuir for high level amateur stuff, Watsons too.
Corstorphine are East League Div 2, as are Livingston who are further west
Forrester are a division above that but are currently equal bottom with a couple of matches to play
I've become involved with my local club since moving back to Scotland. It's much more fulfilling than professional rugby where you are so far removed from everything that is going on.
I wouldn't go to Espionage,TheNatalShark wrote: ↑Tue Feb 11, 2025 7:12 pm Dependent on offer may be in Edinburgh for a while, working in Gogar.
Amateur wise, any clubs to avoid? Unfamiliar with the club scene. Will probably base myself west way.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
Is it to play or support/get involved with?TheNatalShark wrote: ↑Tue Feb 11, 2025 7:12 pm Dependent on offer may be in Edinburgh for a while, working in Gogar.
Amateur wise, any clubs to avoid? Unfamiliar with the club scene. Will probably base myself west way.
Nothing to add on top of the clubs Tichtheid has mentioned. I spend a fair bit of time at Watsonians which is a good club and good people. Also have got to know a few really good folk who are involved with Forrester but have never been down myself
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
Hope you’re right - have noticed it hasn’t appeared on any other service.
It is in truth not for glory, nor riches, nor honours that we are fighting, but for freedom - for that alone, which no honest man gives up but with life itself.
-
- Posts: 337
- Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2020 11:22 pm
The fact Scotland are holding back Kyle Rowe from playing for Glasgow doesn't seem particularly encouraging for Darcy's prognosis. They have released the other 10 from Edinburgh and Glasgow who didn't make the 23 last weekend.
He doesn't seem to rate Reed and with Steyn playing this weekend for the first time in several weeks it's possibly just a contingency.topofthemoon wrote: ↑Wed Feb 12, 2025 12:35 amThe fact Scotland are holding back Kyle Rowe from playing for Glasgow doesn't seem particularly encouraging for Darcy's prognosis. They have released the other 10 from Edinburgh and Glasgow who didn't make the 23 last weekend.
A lot of speculation, but do we know any more about Finn? I think we are in for a very long afternoon if he isn't availabletopofthemoon wrote: ↑Wed Feb 12, 2025 12:35 amThe fact Scotland are holding back Kyle Rowe from playing for Glasgow doesn't seem particularly encouraging for Darcy's prognosis. They have released the other 10 from Edinburgh and Glasgow who didn't make the 23 last weekend.
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
Read something again this morning that I read at the time, but had forgotten. Finn actually passed his HIA after the collision. The medical team (by which I probably mean my old mate Jon) decided not to put him back on the field because despite this, they didn’t think he was quite right. But if he didn’t fail an assessment, presumably the concussion protocols don’t have to be followed in the same way, and he should be available to play. This is surmise, of course. They could have decided to follow the protocols anyway, which involves a mandatory stand down period. Ruck.co.uk were claiming this meant he wouldn’t be able to train with the squad until the day prior to the game. Presumably they did a bit of maths and that’s how they got the headline.Slick wrote: ↑Wed Feb 12, 2025 9:22 amA lot of speculation, but do we know any more about Finn? I think we are in for a very long afternoon if he isn't availabletopofthemoon wrote: ↑Wed Feb 12, 2025 12:35 amThe fact Scotland are holding back Kyle Rowe from playing for Glasgow doesn't seem particularly encouraging for Darcy's prognosis. They have released the other 10 from Edinburgh and Glasgow who didn't make the 23 last weekend.
It is in truth not for glory, nor riches, nor honours that we are fighting, but for freedom - for that alone, which no honest man gives up but with life itself.
I read that, but also read that he failed one later - delayed symptoms.Yr Alban wrote: ↑Wed Feb 12, 2025 9:37 amRead something again this morning that I read at the time, but had forgotten. Finn actually passed his HIA after the collision. The medical team (by which I probably mean my old mate Jon) decided not to put him back on the field because despite this, they didn’t think he was quite right. But if he didn’t fail an assessment, presumably the concussion protocols don’t have to be followed in the same way, and he should be available to play. This is surmise, of course. They could have decided to follow the protocols anyway, which involves a mandatory stand down period. Ruck.co.uk were claiming this meant he wouldn’t be able to train with the squad until the day prior to the game. Presumably they did a bit of maths and that’s how they got the headline.Slick wrote: ↑Wed Feb 12, 2025 9:22 amA lot of speculation, but do we know any more about Finn? I think we are in for a very long afternoon if he isn't availabletopofthemoon wrote: ↑Wed Feb 12, 2025 12:35 am
The fact Scotland are holding back Kyle Rowe from playing for Glasgow doesn't seem particularly encouraging for Darcy's prognosis. They have released the other 10 from Edinburgh and Glasgow who didn't make the 23 last weekend.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
-
- Posts: 337
- Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2020 11:22 pm
If Finn has been removed because he has been showing symptoms of a concussion I think he will be treated as if he has a concussion which is a 12 day stand down from competitive action.
At the very least I would have thought they would treat it like a failed HIA 1 and he would need to pass HIA 2 and HIA 3 to be able to return 7 to days after the incident.
"...any player with a history of concussion or who has been removed from a match with obvious concussion symptoms will sit out of competitive action for a minimum of 12 days.
Players without a history of concussion who subsequently undergo a Head Injury Assessment 3 (HIA 3) that unearths no abnormal findings will be eligible to return on the seventh day after the occurrence of their injury."
The protocol only mentions competitive games not training.
At the very least I would have thought they would treat it like a failed HIA 1 and he would need to pass HIA 2 and HIA 3 to be able to return 7 to days after the incident.
"...any player with a history of concussion or who has been removed from a match with obvious concussion symptoms will sit out of competitive action for a minimum of 12 days.
Players without a history of concussion who subsequently undergo a Head Injury Assessment 3 (HIA 3) that unearths no abnormal findings will be eligible to return on the seventh day after the occurrence of their injury."
The protocol only mentions competitive games not training.
- clydecloggie
- Posts: 1258
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 6:31 am
Big kudos to the Scotland medical team for making that call btw.
As I mentioned earlier, I’ve known the new head of the medical team since we started medical school in 1991. I’d expect no less.clydecloggie wrote: ↑Wed Feb 12, 2025 2:25 pm Big kudos to the Scotland medical team for making that call btw.
It is in truth not for glory, nor riches, nor honours that we are fighting, but for freedom - for that alone, which no honest man gives up but with life itself.
Johnnie Beattie saying on the BBC site ‘careful what you wish for’ wanting to get rid of Toony, saying that we punch above our weight and we can’t expect to beat everyone with the resources we have.
This is very probably true, but it completely misses the point. I can accept a Scotland team that loses games against better sides - as long as they play for the jersey and fight tooth and nail for every inch. Maybe we’re not good enough to win every game, but we should damn well try. But against Ireland (and also South Africa, but we play them far less frequently) we don’t do that. We shit the bed, fail to turn up, call it what you like. We don’t rise to the challenge. Last year in Dublin, we did. It wasn’t quite good enough in the end, and that’s OK. What we deserved to see was that level of commitment again, except with home advantage. We didn’t get it, and I won’t accept that.
This is very probably true, but it completely misses the point. I can accept a Scotland team that loses games against better sides - as long as they play for the jersey and fight tooth and nail for every inch. Maybe we’re not good enough to win every game, but we should damn well try. But against Ireland (and also South Africa, but we play them far less frequently) we don’t do that. We shit the bed, fail to turn up, call it what you like. We don’t rise to the challenge. Last year in Dublin, we did. It wasn’t quite good enough in the end, and that’s OK. What we deserved to see was that level of commitment again, except with home advantage. We didn’t get it, and I won’t accept that.
It is in truth not for glory, nor riches, nor honours that we are fighting, but for freedom - for that alone, which no honest man gives up but with life itself.
He also said he knew they were up for the game. I think it was English who said they looked beaten before kick off and I agree with him. No matter how much bravado those players might show in the changing room, in front of each other, they don't believe it.Yr Alban wrote: ↑Wed Feb 12, 2025 6:56 pm Johnnie Beattie saying on the BBC site ‘careful what you wish for’ wanting to get rid of Toony, saying that we punch above our weight and we can’t expect to beat everyone with the resources we have.
This is very probably true, but it completely misses the point. I can accept a Scotland team that loses games against better sides - as long as they play for the jersey and fight tooth and nail for every inch. Maybe we’re not good enough to win every game, but we should damn well try. But against Ireland (and also South Africa, but we play them far less frequently) we don’t do that. We shit the bed, fail to turn up, call it what you like. We don’t rise to the challenge. Last year in Dublin, we did. It wasn’t quite good enough in the end, and that’s OK. What we deserved to see was that level of commitment again, except with home advantage. We didn’t get it, and I won’t accept that.
I think Toonie’s lost the dressing room. The teams we fall apart against don’t show more passion and grit, they are just much, much better drilled and we don’t have an answer for it and go all deer in the headlights and the confidence evaporates.Jock42 wrote: ↑Wed Feb 12, 2025 6:59 pmHe also said he knew they were up for the game. I think it was English who said they looked beaten before kick off and I agree with him. No matter how much bravado those players might show in the changing room, in front of each other, they don't believe it.Yr Alban wrote: ↑Wed Feb 12, 2025 6:56 pm Johnnie Beattie saying on the BBC site ‘careful what you wish for’ wanting to get rid of Toony, saying that we punch above our weight and we can’t expect to beat everyone with the resources we have.
This is very probably true, but it completely misses the point. I can accept a Scotland team that loses games against better sides - as long as they play for the jersey and fight tooth and nail for every inch. Maybe we’re not good enough to win every game, but we should damn well try. But against Ireland (and also South Africa, but we play them far less frequently) we don’t do that. We shit the bed, fail to turn up, call it what you like. We don’t rise to the challenge. Last year in Dublin, we did. It wasn’t quite good enough in the end, and that’s OK. What we deserved to see was that level of commitment again, except with home advantage. We didn’t get it, and I won’t accept that.
- Paddington Bear
- Posts: 6423
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:29 pm
- Location: Hertfordshire
At the risk of re-opening a discussion (likely to occur throughout Fin Smith’s career anyway), I though Jim Hamilton explained himself as an English born Scot and his attitude to England pretty well on his podcast this week.
Thinking about my own father in law as another Scot who raised his kids outside Scotland, my wife supports England unless they’re playing Scotland and whilst not necessarily a majority view it’ reflects at least a sizeable chunk of people in that situation.
Thinking about my own father in law as another Scot who raised his kids outside Scotland, my wife supports England unless they’re playing Scotland and whilst not necessarily a majority view it’ reflects at least a sizeable chunk of people in that situation.
Old men forget: yet all shall be forgot, But he'll remember with advantages, What feats he did that day
What did Jim say?Paddington Bear wrote: ↑Thu Feb 13, 2025 11:36 am At the risk of re-opening a discussion (likely to occur throughout Fin Smith’s career anyway), I though Jim Hamilton explained himself as an English born Scot and his attitude to England pretty well on his podcast this week.
Thinking about my own father in law as another Scot who raised his kids outside Scotland, my wife supports England unless they’re playing Scotland and whilst not necessarily a majority view it’ reflects at least a sizeable chunk of people in that situation.
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
- Paddington Bear
- Posts: 6423
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:29 pm
- Location: Hertfordshire
Essentially: like England love Scotland, wish them success when not playing Scotland, happy to support the football team in particular (this last point from my anecdotal experience is very common, particularly among part English part Welsh people). A bit more to it but that’s the gistSlick wrote: ↑Thu Feb 13, 2025 11:47 amWhat did Jim say?Paddington Bear wrote: ↑Thu Feb 13, 2025 11:36 am At the risk of re-opening a discussion (likely to occur throughout Fin Smith’s career anyway), I though Jim Hamilton explained himself as an English born Scot and his attitude to England pretty well on his podcast this week.
Thinking about my own father in law as another Scot who raised his kids outside Scotland, my wife supports England unless they’re playing Scotland and whilst not necessarily a majority view it’ reflects at least a sizeable chunk of people in that situation.
Old men forget: yet all shall be forgot, But he'll remember with advantages, What feats he did that day
My boys have a Northern Irish Mum and they'll cheer Ireland on during any rugby match unless it is against Scotland. My wife has been in Scotland for over 20 years now and she does the opposite, cheer for Scotland except when against Ireland, although she hasn't been too disappointed in the rare times we beat them.Paddington Bear wrote: ↑Thu Feb 13, 2025 11:36 am At the risk of re-opening a discussion (likely to occur throughout Fin Smith’s career anyway), I though Jim Hamilton explained himself as an English born Scot and his attitude to England pretty well on his podcast this week.
Thinking about my own father in law as another Scot who raised his kids outside Scotland, my wife supports England unless they’re playing Scotland and whilst not necessarily a majority view it’ reflects at least a sizeable chunk of people in that situation.
Paddington Bear wrote: ↑Thu Feb 13, 2025 11:36 am At the risk of re-opening a discussion (likely to occur throughout Fin Smith’s career anyway), I though Jim Hamilton explained himself as an English born Scot and his attitude to England pretty well on his podcast this week.
Thinking about my own father in law as another Scot who raised his kids outside Scotland, my wife supports England unless they’re playing Scotland and whilst not necessarily a majority view it’ reflects at least a sizeable chunk of people in that situation.
I say the following having lived in Brighton for 30 years - I tend to support teams that play the kind of rugby I like, so it's usually France as my second team. I wish England well when they are not playing us, but to be honest there are things that either grate or I find cringeworthy especially in football - 1966 and all that, nearly 60 years ago and they still bang on about it.
I loved the great New Zealand sides of Carter and McCaw but when England beat a later iteration of them in the 2019 World Cup I applauded them, that was fantastic display, and I cheered them heartily when they won the RWC.
I went to Twickenham for the Calcutta Cup with a bunch of mates from Brighton who are all English. Unfortunately that was before the current run of games but it was a terrific day out.
You know that Batman meme where he slaps Robin for saying something stupid? That should happen to Ben Earl every time he screams his head off when the opposition knocks on.
-
- Posts: 337
- Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2020 11:22 pm
From the story on Darcy Graham it sounds like a 12-day stand down will mean missing the England game as he's being reported as only likely to be available for the final two fixtures.topofthemoon wrote: ↑Wed Feb 12, 2025 1:11 pm If Finn has been removed because he has been showing symptoms of a concussion I think he will be treated as if he has a concussion which is a 12 day stand down from competitive action.
At the very least I would have thought they would treat it like a failed HIA 1 and he would need to pass HIA 2 and HIA 3 to be able to return 7 to days after the incident.
"...any player with a history of concussion or who has been removed from a match with obvious concussion symptoms will sit out of competitive action for a minimum of 12 days.
Players without a history of concussion who subsequently undergo a Head Injury Assessment 3 (HIA 3) that unearths no abnormal findings will be eligible to return on the seventh day after the occurrence of their injury."
The protocol only mentions competitive games not training.
So Finn's availability rests on whether the symptoms he showed are being treated as evidence of concussion - which would be a 12-day stand down - or a failed HIA in which case he will have to pass HIA 2 and HIA 3 in order to be available for the England game, including the week's preparations leading up to it.
What’s with the sudden inclusion of the players’ school teams in the line-up? I know the SRU allocate pro players to Premiership clubs, but that’s not what’s going on here, given the inclusion of teams in SA and England.
It is in truth not for glory, nor riches, nor honours that we are fighting, but for freedom - for that alone, which no honest man gives up but with life itself.
I’m staying out of it this time. I seemed to upset people first time round.Paddington Bear wrote: ↑Thu Feb 13, 2025 11:36 am At the risk of re-opening a discussion (likely to occur throughout Fin Smith’s career anyway), I though Jim Hamilton explained himself as an English born Scot and his attitude to England pretty well on his podcast this week.
Thinking about my own father in law as another Scot who raised his kids outside Scotland, my wife supports England unless they’re playing Scotland and whilst not necessarily a majority view it’ reflects at least a sizeable chunk of people in that situation.
I’ll just observe that the stage is quite clearly set for a command performance from the man to break our recent Twickenham streak.
It is in truth not for glory, nor riches, nor honours that we are fighting, but for freedom - for that alone, which no honest man gives up but with life itself.
It's "Origin Round" where the league celebrates players amateur clubs.
Ah, I hadn’t heard about that.
It is in truth not for glory, nor riches, nor honours that we are fighting, but for freedom - for that alone, which no honest man gives up but with life itself.
-
- Posts: 208
- Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2021 7:09 pm
- Paddington Bear
- Posts: 6423
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:29 pm
- Location: Hertfordshire
I completely get your POV which is entirely valid, it’s worth listening to Hamilton et al as a reminder that some (most?) people qualified for multiple countries have a foot in both camps and would happily represent eitherYr Alban wrote: ↑Thu Feb 13, 2025 3:10 pmI’m staying out of it this time. I seemed to upset people first time round.Paddington Bear wrote: ↑Thu Feb 13, 2025 11:36 am At the risk of re-opening a discussion (likely to occur throughout Fin Smith’s career anyway), I though Jim Hamilton explained himself as an English born Scot and his attitude to England pretty well on his podcast this week.
Thinking about my own father in law as another Scot who raised his kids outside Scotland, my wife supports England unless they’re playing Scotland and whilst not necessarily a majority view it’ reflects at least a sizeable chunk of people in that situation.
I’ll just observe that the stage is quite clearly set for a command performance from the man to break our recent Twickenham streak.
Old men forget: yet all shall be forgot, But he'll remember with advantages, What feats he did that day
Anyone still clinging to a vague idea that London Scottish can somehow become our third pro team and play in the URC, this would suggest it ain’t gonna happen.
https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2025/ ... SApp_Other
https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2025/ ... SApp_Other
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
I fully accept this may be a stupid question, but what can actually be done if a club decides to join a foreign league but base themselves in England? Presumably it's not against the law of the land to play a game of rugby, even without the RFU's blessing?Biffer wrote: ↑Fri Feb 14, 2025 10:50 am Anyone still clinging to a vague idea that London Scottish can somehow become our third pro team and play in the URC, this would suggest it ain’t gonna happen.
https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2025/ ... SApp_Other
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
They'd also have to find a new ground if it ever happened. Richmond Athletic Ground would never be allowed to be redevelopedBiffer wrote: ↑Fri Feb 14, 2025 10:50 am Anyone still clinging to a vague idea that London Scottish can somehow become our third pro team and play in the URC, this would suggest it ain’t gonna happen.
https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2025/ ... SApp_Other
I assume there's some clauses in whatever contract they've signed being part of the RFU that wouldn't allow that. Health and safety/insurance type stuff.Slick wrote: ↑Fri Feb 14, 2025 11:19 amI fully accept this may be a stupid question, but what can actually be done if a club decides to join a foreign league but base themselves in England? Presumably it's not against the law of the land to play a game of rugby, even without the RFU's blessing?Biffer wrote: ↑Fri Feb 14, 2025 10:50 am Anyone still clinging to a vague idea that London Scottish can somehow become our third pro team and play in the URC, this would suggest it ain’t gonna happen.
https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2025/ ... SApp_Other
- Paddington Bear
- Posts: 6423
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:29 pm
- Location: Hertfordshire
Believe it is the same everywhere - World Rugby will not sanction a game that isn’t approved by the hosting unionJock42 wrote: ↑Fri Feb 14, 2025 11:41 amI assume there's some clauses in whatever contract they've signed being part of the RFU that wouldn't allow that. Health and safety/insurance type stuff.Slick wrote: ↑Fri Feb 14, 2025 11:19 amI fully accept this may be a stupid question, but what can actually be done if a club decides to join a foreign league but base themselves in England? Presumably it's not against the law of the land to play a game of rugby, even without the RFU's blessing?Biffer wrote: ↑Fri Feb 14, 2025 10:50 am Anyone still clinging to a vague idea that London Scottish can somehow become our third pro team and play in the URC, this would suggest it ain’t gonna happen.
https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2025/ ... SApp_Other
Old men forget: yet all shall be forgot, But he'll remember with advantages, What feats he did that day
That was the bit I knew I was missing.Paddington Bear wrote: ↑Fri Feb 14, 2025 11:52 amBelieve it is the same everywhere - World Rugby will not sanction a game that isn’t approved by the hosting union
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
I think this was probably always a doomed idea from the outset, but I don’t think the two situations are exactly alike. The article cites that London Irish would be in the doghouse for going into admin after receiving £150m in RFU funding, which would obviously make them reluctant to let them defect to the URC. Scottish didn’t go bust and presumably have had a fraction of that money, and they have always been affiliated to both the RFU and the SRU.Biffer wrote: ↑Fri Feb 14, 2025 10:50 am Anyone still clinging to a vague idea that London Scottish can somehow become our third pro team and play in the URC, this would suggest it ain’t gonna happen.
https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2025/ ... SApp_Other
Having said that, I still think the idea will go nowhere, because the RFU would need to sign off on it, and what would be in it for them?
It is in truth not for glory, nor riches, nor honours that we are fighting, but for freedom - for that alone, which no honest man gives up but with life itself.