Starmergeddon: They Came And Ate Us

Where goats go to escape
Yeeb
Posts: 1504
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 12:06 pm

Paddington Bear wrote: Thu Feb 06, 2025 11:41 am
Yeeb wrote: Thu Feb 06, 2025 11:34 am
Paddington Bear wrote: Thu Feb 06, 2025 11:07 am

To be honest this is the bit that worries me - Starmer’s announcement on housebuilding was funding for more planning officers, the better solution is to rip out a dysfunctional system rather than feed more people into it. Major infrastructure projects should be being approved through primary legislation, leaving team newt with nothing but their dick in their hands.

A small scale example of the system not functioning - had a chat with my next door neighbour a couple of days ago who is looking to add a pretty modest extension and has been quoted a minimum of 14 weeks for a decision. This should just be covered by permitted development rights and a design code (we live in a conservation area). Why is this wasting public time and money at all, just let him build it!
Terrible idea, go to any African Asian or east euro city and see what happens when people are just let to build stuff.
That’s why I said design code. We already have this to some extent, it’s about extending it. Plus our planning system spews out shit outcomes anyway
Sorry I don’t follow, you approve of conservation areas , code of practices and extension to permitted limits , you just don’t want anyone official to check it or enforce the rules ?

watch it
User avatar
Paddington Bear
Posts: 6649
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:29 pm
Location: Hertfordshire

Yeeb wrote: Thu Feb 06, 2025 11:50 am
Paddington Bear wrote: Thu Feb 06, 2025 11:41 am
Yeeb wrote: Thu Feb 06, 2025 11:34 am

Terrible idea, go to any African Asian or east euro city and see what happens when people are just let to build stuff.
That’s why I said design code. We already have this to some extent, it’s about extending it. Plus our planning system spews out shit outcomes anyway
Sorry I don’t follow, you approve of conservation areas , code of practices and extension to permitted limits , you just don’t want anyone official to check it or enforce the rules ?

Not disagreeing with you re shit outcomes, the normal is some Asian bribing someone so his gym with heating , water and washing facilities gets approved, and then hiding 17 waiters off the boat in there for £200 per week cash rent
No, I think that residential development should be more permissive on the building side with far more focus and powers on enforcement. I.e. my neighbour should be able to get on with building an extension, and if he builds it out of code/regs the council come and knock it down at his expense with a hefty fine.

The planning process as is doesn’t stop someone taking the piss on regs/design, it just heaps more cost and delays on people who play by the rules and discourages us making the most of existing housing.
Old men forget: yet all shall be forgot, But he'll remember with advantages, What feats he did that day
User avatar
Paddington Bear
Posts: 6649
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:29 pm
Location: Hertfordshire

inactionman wrote: Thu Feb 06, 2025 11:41 am
Paddington Bear wrote: Thu Feb 06, 2025 11:07 am
Raggs wrote: Thu Feb 06, 2025 11:03 am

If I recall, 2 of the people they put into high level positions, were planning specialists, getting through red tape etc. I'd assume if they want to get to the timeframe in the article, there'd have to be spades in the ground by the end of their term (and hopefully another term to keep it going).
To be honest this is the bit that worries me - Starmer’s announcement on housebuilding was funding for more planning officers, the better solution is to rip out a dysfunctional system rather than feed more people into it. Major infrastructure projects should be being approved through primary legislation, leaving team newt with nothing but their dick in their hands.

A small scale example of the system not functioning - had a chat with my next door neighbour a couple of days ago who is looking to add a pretty modest extension and has been quoted a minimum of 14 weeks for a decision. This should just be covered by permitted development rights and a design code (we live in a conservation area). Why is this wasting public time and money at all, just let him build it!
Councils and related functions are just slow, I'm afraid. Not great, but getting rid of protections as we've under-resourced councils in the first place doesn't seem appropriate. I've seen some monstrosities in my time, so many lovely buildings in Bath ruined by shitty extensions built when planning control was a fancy foreign idea and property in Bath went for peanuts. I'm glad we've got more rigorous control now, but I do appreciate there is plenty of opportunity for optimising it to allow for sensible development without excessive red tape.

As an aside, I thought you could push back a standard amount within the front profile of the building - does that not work for conservation areas, or is the extension larger than that/outside of the projection of the house?
You can - albeit I think the extent to which you can is more limited. He’s going out the side which will be visible from the front, which seems to be the sticking point.

And I’m not suggesting a free for all - planning control should focus on enforcement rather than box-ticking up front. This means planners can focus more time on larger developments and commercial developments where piss taking is more widespread and serious
Old men forget: yet all shall be forgot, But he'll remember with advantages, What feats he did that day
Jockaline
Posts: 243
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2020 6:23 pm
Location: Scotland

Paddington Bear wrote: Thu Feb 06, 2025 11:07 am
Raggs wrote: Thu Feb 06, 2025 11:03 am
Paddington Bear wrote: Thu Feb 06, 2025 11:00 am

Alongside Reeves’ support for major infrastructure projects this is theoretically excellent news, the hope has to he when they say they support it they mean actually forcing spades into the ground rather than a decade spent in the planning system
If I recall, 2 of the people they put into high level positions, were planning specialists, getting through red tape etc. I'd assume if they want to get to the timeframe in the article, there'd have to be spades in the ground by the end of their term (and hopefully another term to keep it going).
To be honest this is the bit that worries me - Starmer’s announcement on housebuilding was funding for more planning officers, the better solution is to rip out a dysfunctional system rather than feed more people into it. Major infrastructure projects should be being approved through primary legislation, leaving team newt with nothing but their dick in their hands.

A small scale example of the system not functioning - had a chat with my next door neighbour a couple of days ago who is looking to add a pretty modest extension and has been quoted a minimum of 14 weeks for a decision. This should just be covered by permitted development rights and a design code (we live in a conservation area). Why is this wasting public time and money at all, just let him build it!
Presume you have an inside track on what he'd planning, and your happy with it. However, if you didn't and said extension blocked all the light coming into living room, you'd be mightily angry you weren't consulted and had some input before it was built. A lot of the rules and processes are there for good reason even if they go a bit too far.
User avatar
Paddington Bear
Posts: 6649
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:29 pm
Location: Hertfordshire

Jockaline wrote: Thu Feb 06, 2025 12:54 pm
Paddington Bear wrote: Thu Feb 06, 2025 11:07 am
Raggs wrote: Thu Feb 06, 2025 11:03 am

If I recall, 2 of the people they put into high level positions, were planning specialists, getting through red tape etc. I'd assume if they want to get to the timeframe in the article, there'd have to be spades in the ground by the end of their term (and hopefully another term to keep it going).
To be honest this is the bit that worries me - Starmer’s announcement on housebuilding was funding for more planning officers, the better solution is to rip out a dysfunctional system rather than feed more people into it. Major infrastructure projects should be being approved through primary legislation, leaving team newt with nothing but their dick in their hands.

A small scale example of the system not functioning - had a chat with my next door neighbour a couple of days ago who is looking to add a pretty modest extension and has been quoted a minimum of 14 weeks for a decision. This should just be covered by permitted development rights and a design code (we live in a conservation area). Why is this wasting public time and money at all, just let him build it!
Presume you have an inside track on what he'd planning, and your happy with it. However, if you didn't and said extension blocked all the light coming into living room, you'd be mightily angry you weren't consulted and had some input before it was built. A lot of the rules and processes are there for good reason even if they go a bit too far.
Yes, but the regs give me a right to light if it blocked it out to a building anyway, taking 14 weeks to go through a process that says ‘comply with the law’ on a very modest extension seems to me a total waste of resources and a deterrent to modest extensions.

Basically I’m saying the rules and processes are being implemented at the wrong time for the wrong types of projects, which acts to discourage things the government ought to be encouraging
Old men forget: yet all shall be forgot, But he'll remember with advantages, What feats he did that day
Biffer
Posts: 10014
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 6:43 pm

Paddington Bear wrote: Thu Feb 06, 2025 1:34 pm
Jockaline wrote: Thu Feb 06, 2025 12:54 pm
Paddington Bear wrote: Thu Feb 06, 2025 11:07 am

To be honest this is the bit that worries me - Starmer’s announcement on housebuilding was funding for more planning officers, the better solution is to rip out a dysfunctional system rather than feed more people into it. Major infrastructure projects should be being approved through primary legislation, leaving team newt with nothing but their dick in their hands.

A small scale example of the system not functioning - had a chat with my next door neighbour a couple of days ago who is looking to add a pretty modest extension and has been quoted a minimum of 14 weeks for a decision. This should just be covered by permitted development rights and a design code (we live in a conservation area). Why is this wasting public time and money at all, just let him build it!
Presume you have an inside track on what he'd planning, and your happy with it. However, if you didn't and said extension blocked all the light coming into living room, you'd be mightily angry you weren't consulted and had some input before it was built. A lot of the rules and processes are there for good reason even if they go a bit too far.
Yes, but the regs give me a right to light if it blocked it out to a building anyway, taking 14 weeks to go through a process that says ‘comply with the law’ on a very modest extension seems to me a total waste of resources and a deterrent to modest extensions.

Basically I’m saying the rules and processes are being implemented at the wrong time for the wrong types of projects, which acts to discourage things the government ought to be encouraging
Not entirely clear what you're saying here - you'd rather he built it, blocked your light and then had to take it down?
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
Biffer
Posts: 10014
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 6:43 pm

Interesting that there's absolutely no noise anywhere about UK 2 year gilts now coming down below the rate they were the day before the budget.

Strange, it seemed this was absolutely critical for all of us about six weeks ago.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
Yeeb
Posts: 1504
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 12:06 pm

Biffer wrote: Thu Feb 06, 2025 4:31 pm Interesting that there's absolutely no noise anywhere about UK 2 year gilts now coming down below the rate they were the day before the budget.

Strange, it seemed this was absolutely critical for all of us about six weeks ago.
Do you mean prices or yield ? It’s hard to decipher you at times
User avatar
Paddington Bear
Posts: 6649
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:29 pm
Location: Hertfordshire

Biffer wrote: Thu Feb 06, 2025 1:43 pm
Paddington Bear wrote: Thu Feb 06, 2025 1:34 pm
Jockaline wrote: Thu Feb 06, 2025 12:54 pm

Presume you have an inside track on what he'd planning, and your happy with it. However, if you didn't and said extension blocked all the light coming into living room, you'd be mightily angry you weren't consulted and had some input before it was built. A lot of the rules and processes are there for good reason even if they go a bit too far.
Yes, but the regs give me a right to light if it blocked it out to a building anyway, taking 14 weeks to go through a process that says ‘comply with the law’ on a very modest extension seems to me a total waste of resources and a deterrent to modest extensions.

Basically I’m saying the rules and processes are being implemented at the wrong time for the wrong types of projects, which acts to discourage things the government ought to be encouraging
Not entirely clear what you're saying here - you'd rather he built it, blocked your light and then had to take it down?
Entirely clear - I’d rather he built it. What I’m suggesting is an extension of permitted development rights that already exist
Old men forget: yet all shall be forgot, But he'll remember with advantages, What feats he did that day
User avatar
Sandstorm
Posts: 11667
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:05 pm
Location: England

14 weeks for permission is fuck-all. He’ll wait 30 weeks for his chosen builder to even show up.
User avatar
tabascoboy
Posts: 6803
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 8:22 am
Location: 曇りの街

Why are so many politicians appointed to ministerial positions under the last and this government rather unpleasant individuals - is it a job requirement?
Health Minister Andrew Gwynne sacked over messages

Health Minister Andrew Gwynne has apologised for "badly misjudged" WhatsApp messages after he was sacked by Sir Keir Starmer.

The MP for Gorton and Denton was also suspended from the Labour Party after the Mail on Sunday reported, external he had sent a string of offensive and abusive messages, insulting constituents, fellow MPs and councillors.

A government spokesperson said Sir Keir "is determined uphold high standards of those in public office" and "will not hesitate to take action against any minister who fails to meet these standards, as he has in this case".

Gwynne said on X that he understood the prime minister and Labour's decision, and "while very sad to have been suspended, will support them in any way I can".

A Labour spokesperson said Gwynne has been "administratively suspended" as a party member as it investigates "comments made in this WhatsApp group in line with the Labour Party's rules and procedures".

"Swift action will be taken if individuals are found to have breached the high standards expected of them as Labour Party members," the spokesperson added.

In messages seen by the Mail on Sunday, Gwynne said he hoped a 72-year-old woman would soon be dead after she wrote to her local councillor about bin collections.

The councillor shared the woman's letter with Gwynne and other Labour figures in a WhatsApp group called Trigger Me Timbers, the newspaper reported.

The newspaper said he also joked about a constituent being "mown down" by a truck.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c5y7zperkelo
User avatar
Hal Jordan
Posts: 4574
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 12:48 pm
Location: Sector 2814

I get the feeling that you don't get to be a politician without being willing to shit all over everyone to get there.
User avatar
SaintK
Posts: 7273
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 7:49 am
Location: Over there somewhere

tabascoboy wrote: Sat Feb 08, 2025 8:41 pm Why are so many politicians appointed to ministerial positions under the last and this government rather unpleasant individuals - is it a job requirement?
Health Minister Andrew Gwynne sacked over messages

Health Minister Andrew Gwynne has apologised for "badly misjudged" WhatsApp messages after he was sacked by Sir Keir Starmer.

The MP for Gorton and Denton was also suspended from the Labour Party after the Mail on Sunday reported, external he had sent a string of offensive and abusive messages, insulting constituents, fellow MPs and councillors.

A government spokesperson said Sir Keir "is determined uphold high standards of those in public office" and "will not hesitate to take action against any minister who fails to meet these standards, as he has in this case".

Gwynne said on X that he understood the prime minister and Labour's decision, and "while very sad to have been suspended, will support them in any way I can".

A Labour spokesperson said Gwynne has been "administratively suspended" as a party member as it investigates "comments made in this WhatsApp group in line with the Labour Party's rules and procedures".

"Swift action will be taken if individuals are found to have breached the high standards expected of them as Labour Party members," the spokesperson added.

In messages seen by the Mail on Sunday, Gwynne said he hoped a 72-year-old woman would soon be dead after she wrote to her local councillor about bin collections.

The councillor shared the woman's letter with Gwynne and other Labour figures in a WhatsApp group called Trigger Me Timbers, the newspaper reported.

The newspaper said he also joked about a constituent being "mown down" by a truck.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c5y7zperkelo
I'm amazed these things aren't leaked more often. The lack of due diligence is awful
Can't wait for a few more Reform candidates to be voted in!!!!
User avatar
JM2K6
Posts: 10127
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2020 10:43 am

Good to see them get immediately dealt with, but awful that they're there in the first place.

Still, given the rate this lot are going, in about 6 months it'll be the Facebook and IEA-backed Starmer & his new allies in the 1922 Committee in daily battles against Reform and a legion of Grok-powered Muskbots spewing slurs on command

Whoever wins, we lose
User avatar
Margin__Walker
Posts: 2801
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 5:47 am

Apart from clearly being a massive prick, it's always amused me just how stupid these people often are.

What kind of idiot fires this stuff out over WhatsApp in a group with a largish membership. Political suicide.
Yeeb
Posts: 1504
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 12:06 pm

Margin__Walker wrote: Sun Feb 09, 2025 2:53 pm Apart from clearly being a massive prick, it's always amused me just how stupid these people often are.

What kind of idiot fires this stuff out over WhatsApp in a group with a largish membership. Political suicide.
Scandal hit Labour seem to be losing & sacking mps and ministers at much the same rate as the last lot
User avatar
Hal Jordan
Posts: 4574
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 12:48 pm
Location: Sector 2814

Margin__Walker wrote: Sun Feb 09, 2025 2:53 pm Apart from clearly being a massive prick, it's always amused me just how stupid these people often are.

What kind of idiot fires this stuff out over WhatsApp in a group with a largish membership. Political suicide.
Amazing how much decryption/recovery tech has moved on in just a few short years...
User avatar
Sandstorm
Posts: 11667
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:05 pm
Location: England

Hal Jordan wrote: Mon Feb 10, 2025 9:06 am
Margin__Walker wrote: Sun Feb 09, 2025 2:53 pm Apart from clearly being a massive prick, it's always amused me just how stupid these people often are.

What kind of idiot fires this stuff out over WhatsApp in a group with a largish membership. Political suicide.
Amazing how much decryption/recovery tech has moved on in just a few short years...
In this case it was a whistle-blower. What's the world coming to when politicians can't trust each other!!
Slick
Posts: 13217
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:58 pm

Sandstorm wrote: Mon Feb 10, 2025 9:27 am
Hal Jordan wrote: Mon Feb 10, 2025 9:06 am
Margin__Walker wrote: Sun Feb 09, 2025 2:53 pm Apart from clearly being a massive prick, it's always amused me just how stupid these people often are.

What kind of idiot fires this stuff out over WhatsApp in a group with a largish membership. Political suicide.
Amazing how much decryption/recovery tech has moved on in just a few short years...
In this case it was a whistle-blower. What's the world coming to when politicians can't trust each other!!
And now another MP from the same Whatsapp chat getting in trouble
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
Yeeb
Posts: 1504
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 12:06 pm

Hal Jordan wrote: Mon Feb 10, 2025 9:06 am
Margin__Walker wrote: Sun Feb 09, 2025 2:53 pm Apart from clearly being a massive prick, it's always amused me just how stupid these people often are.

What kind of idiot fires this stuff out over WhatsApp in a group with a largish membership. Political suicide.
Amazing how much decryption/recovery tech has moved on in just a few short years...
Probably best I don’t go into politics as suspect some would find some of my quotes or search history objectionable ..
User avatar
Paddington Bear
Posts: 6649
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:29 pm
Location: Hertfordshire

This is so dumb - this is politics, these people aren’t your friends and it will get leaked, what were they thinking
Old men forget: yet all shall be forgot, But he'll remember with advantages, What feats he did that day
User avatar
Margin__Walker
Posts: 2801
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 5:47 am

Paddington Bear wrote: Mon Feb 10, 2025 10:47 am This is so dumb - this is politics, these people aren’t your friends and it will get leaked, what were they thinking
Exactly. It's incredibly naïve expecting stuff like this not to leak eventually. You're giving dozens of people the opportunity to sink you. You only have to fall out with, or not be aligned to one of them.
User avatar
SaintK
Posts: 7273
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 7:49 am
Location: Over there somewhere

Yeeb wrote: Mon Feb 10, 2025 10:40 am
Hal Jordan wrote: Mon Feb 10, 2025 9:06 am
Margin__Walker wrote: Sun Feb 09, 2025 2:53 pm Apart from clearly being a massive prick, it's always amused me just how stupid these people often are.

What kind of idiot fires this stuff out over WhatsApp in a group with a largish membership. Political suicide.
Amazing how much decryption/recovery tech has moved on in just a few short years...
Probably best I don’t go into politics as suspect some would find most of my quotes or search history objectionable ..
Fixed for accuracy :thumbup:
Yeeb
Posts: 1504
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 12:06 pm

SaintK wrote: Mon Feb 10, 2025 11:07 am
Yeeb wrote: Mon Feb 10, 2025 10:40 am
Hal Jordan wrote: Mon Feb 10, 2025 9:06 am

Amazing how much decryption/recovery tech has moved on in just a few short years...
Probably best I don’t go into politics as suspect some would find most of my quotes or search history objectionable ..
Fixed for accuracy :thumbup:
Nice.

The only trouble with being a troll mirthmaker from the bank of smiles , especially one not adverse to risqué topics , is that when I do actually be serious , a bobblehat will see it as me being racist or sexist or whatever.

Eg People who do ABC are likely to be X according to official reports of crime ABC, I post that and someone will whinge & conveniently omit that I also joke about Y and Z committing crimes DEF because it only fits their agenda to get upset about X
User avatar
Guy Smiley
Posts: 6635
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:52 pm

Mirthmaker?


good grief, your head is further up your arse than I thought. No wonder you spout so much shit, you're on constant loop.
Yeeb
Posts: 1504
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 12:06 pm

Guy Smiley wrote: Mon Feb 10, 2025 11:33 am Mirthmaker?


good grief, your head is further up your arse than I thought. No wonder you spout so much shit, you're on constant loop.
Your mum also spouts shit
Biffer
Posts: 10014
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 6:43 pm

Nice to see Badenoch on top form at PMQs 😂😂😂
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
I like neeps
Posts: 3788
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 9:37 am

Labour have announced people who arrive in the UK via "irregular crossings" will be unable to claim British citizenship.

Maybe a good deterrent, but Labour are falling into the same trap as the Tories did. By talking about immigration you play into Reforms hands. You can't out Reform Reform. And they have little policy leavers to stop the numbers going up.
User avatar
SaintK
Posts: 7273
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 7:49 am
Location: Over there somewhere

Biffer wrote: Wed Feb 12, 2025 5:22 pm Nice to see Badenoch on top form at PMQs 😂😂😂
Worst one yet............embarrassing!
robmatic
Posts: 2311
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 7:46 am

I like neeps wrote: Wed Feb 12, 2025 5:25 pm Labour have announced people who arrive in the UK via "irregular crossings" will be unable to claim British citizenship.

Maybe a good deterrent, but Labour are falling into the same trap as the Tories did. By talking about immigration you play into Reforms hands. You can't out Reform Reform. And they have little policy leavers to stop the numbers going up.
I'm not sure that keeping quiet about immigration while overseeing record-breaking net migration figures would go any better.
Biffer
Posts: 10014
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 6:43 pm

robmatic wrote: Wed Feb 12, 2025 5:48 pm
I like neeps wrote: Wed Feb 12, 2025 5:25 pm Labour have announced people who arrive in the UK via "irregular crossings" will be unable to claim British citizenship.

Maybe a good deterrent, but Labour are falling into the same trap as the Tories did. By talking about immigration you play into Reforms hands. You can't out Reform Reform. And they have little policy leavers to stop the numbers going up.
I'm not sure that keeping quiet about immigration while overseeing record-breaking net migration figures would go any better.
I wouldn’t be focussing on it too much. Let Farage wank himself into a fury then ignore him completely. It only bites with a certain amount of people and I think that’s maxed out more or less. Press your air time on hi tech growth, education and investment in infrastructure.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
I like neeps
Posts: 3788
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 9:37 am

robmatic wrote: Wed Feb 12, 2025 5:48 pm
I like neeps wrote: Wed Feb 12, 2025 5:25 pm Labour have announced people who arrive in the UK via "irregular crossings" will be unable to claim British citizenship.

Maybe a good deterrent, but Labour are falling into the same trap as the Tories did. By talking about immigration you play into Reforms hands. You can't out Reform Reform. And they have little policy leavers to stop the numbers going up.
I'm not sure that keeping quiet about immigration while overseeing record-breaking net migration figures would go any better.
Well different numbers, net migration is mostly legal. But yes agree there's no good options but crackdowns do just play to Reform who will promise to crackdown harder.

Voters who have immigration as a top concern won't vote Labour so they're really just boosting Farage.
User avatar
Paddington Bear
Posts: 6649
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:29 pm
Location: Hertfordshire

I like neeps wrote: Wed Feb 12, 2025 6:57 pm
robmatic wrote: Wed Feb 12, 2025 5:48 pm
I like neeps wrote: Wed Feb 12, 2025 5:25 pm Labour have announced people who arrive in the UK via "irregular crossings" will be unable to claim British citizenship.

Maybe a good deterrent, but Labour are falling into the same trap as the Tories did. By talking about immigration you play into Reforms hands. You can't out Reform Reform. And they have little policy leavers to stop the numbers going up.
I'm not sure that keeping quiet about immigration while overseeing record-breaking net migration figures would go any better.
Well different numbers, net migration is mostly legal. But yes agree there's no good options but crackdowns do just play to Reform who will promise to crackdown harder.

Voters who have immigration as a top concern won't vote Labour so they're really just boosting Farage.
Think this sort of debate is 10 years out of date and does not reflect just how out of hand legal migration has got, particularly in SE England.
Old men forget: yet all shall be forgot, But he'll remember with advantages, What feats he did that day
Biffer
Posts: 10014
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 6:43 pm

SaintK wrote: Wed Feb 12, 2025 5:29 pm
Biffer wrote: Wed Feb 12, 2025 5:22 pm Nice to see Badenoch on top form at PMQs 😂😂😂
Worst one yet............embarrassing!
Yeah, the question about the guy in Finland almost seems like her own team are trying to sabotage her.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
I like neeps
Posts: 3788
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 9:37 am

Paddington Bear wrote: Wed Feb 12, 2025 7:12 pm
I like neeps wrote: Wed Feb 12, 2025 6:57 pm
robmatic wrote: Wed Feb 12, 2025 5:48 pm

I'm not sure that keeping quiet about immigration while overseeing record-breaking net migration figures would go any better.
Well different numbers, net migration is mostly legal. But yes agree there's no good options but crackdowns do just play to Reform who will promise to crackdown harder.

Voters who have immigration as a top concern won't vote Labour so they're really just boosting Farage.
Think this sort of debate is 10 years out of date and does not reflect just how out of hand legal migration has got, particularly in SE England.
Legal migration is out of hand, but they aren't cracking down on that, they're coming down tough on the more politically salient topic which plays to Farage.

Labour to their credit are becoming administrators of removals and the quicker they can get the system functioning the better. They do need to look at how to cut down on economically inactive legal immigrants too but that's a different discussion to small boats.
dpedin
Posts: 3336
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:35 am

Paddington Bear wrote: Wed Feb 12, 2025 7:12 pm
I like neeps wrote: Wed Feb 12, 2025 6:57 pm
robmatic wrote: Wed Feb 12, 2025 5:48 pm

I'm not sure that keeping quiet about immigration while overseeing record-breaking net migration figures would go any better.
Well different numbers, net migration is mostly legal. But yes agree there's no good options but crackdowns do just play to Reform who will promise to crackdown harder.

Voters who have immigration as a top concern won't vote Labour so they're really just boosting Farage.
Think this sort of debate is 10 years out of date and does not reflect just how out of hand legal migration has got, particularly in SE England.
Thank the Tories for that one - Brexit and uncontrolled legal immigration! London and the SE have the highest levels of immigrants in the UK but this is a reflection of it having a growing economy, one of the highest population growth rates, highest cost of living and where demand for workers is high.

However the NHS, social care and many other services/industries in the SE would completely collapse without immigrants filling poorly paid jobs and those highly specialist jobs where there are national shortages ie NHS Consultants. In all seriousness it is a difficult choice ie no immigrants = even worse NHS services, no one to look after your Grannie in her care home or feed her at home, no barrista to pour your coffee and less workers in the factories. Your call!
User avatar
Sandstorm
Posts: 11667
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:05 pm
Location: England

dpedin wrote: Thu Feb 13, 2025 9:44 am
However the NHS, social care and many other services/industries in the SE would completely collapse without immigrants filling poorly paid jobs and those highly specialist jobs where there are national shortages ie NHS Consultants. In all seriousness it is a difficult choice ie no immigrants = even worse NHS services, no one to look after your Grannie in her care home or feed her at home, no barrista to pour your coffee and less workers in the factories. Your call!
The problem is GPs and dentists. They're lazy and/or over-subscribed with patients and this is exactly where Brits across the land see first-hand how stretched the NHS is. If Labour get GPs off their arses and stop bad conveyor-belt dentistry by managing these practises properly, instead of just focussing on "hospital waiting times..." then the public is happier, Farage voters go away and Reform is toast!

You'd also free up 1000s of hospital beds because GPs are actually seeing patients instead of offloading them onto the hospitals....
User avatar
Raggs
Posts: 3837
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 6:51 pm

I like neeps wrote: Thu Feb 13, 2025 9:29 am
Paddington Bear wrote: Wed Feb 12, 2025 7:12 pm
I like neeps wrote: Wed Feb 12, 2025 6:57 pm

Well different numbers, net migration is mostly legal. But yes agree there's no good options but crackdowns do just play to Reform who will promise to crackdown harder.

Voters who have immigration as a top concern won't vote Labour so they're really just boosting Farage.
Think this sort of debate is 10 years out of date and does not reflect just how out of hand legal migration has got, particularly in SE England.
Legal migration is out of hand, but they aren't cracking down on that, they're coming down tough on the more politically salient topic which plays to Farage.

Labour to their credit are becoming administrators of removals and the quicker they can get the system functioning the better. They do need to look at how to cut down on economically inactive legal immigrants too but that's a different discussion to small boats.
If they agree young person freedom of movement with the EU, that will help with legal migration I suspect.
Give a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.
dpedin
Posts: 3336
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:35 am

Sandstorm wrote: Thu Feb 13, 2025 9:53 am
dpedin wrote: Thu Feb 13, 2025 9:44 am
However the NHS, social care and many other services/industries in the SE would completely collapse without immigrants filling poorly paid jobs and those highly specialist jobs where there are national shortages ie NHS Consultants. In all seriousness it is a difficult choice ie no immigrants = even worse NHS services, no one to look after your Grannie in her care home or feed her at home, no barrista to pour your coffee and less workers in the factories. Your call!
The problem is GPs and dentists. They're lazy and/or over-subscribed with patients and this is exactly where Brits across the land see first-hand how stretched the NHS is. If Labour get GPs off their arses and stop bad conveyor-belt dentistry by managing these practises properly, instead of just focussing on "hospital waiting times..." then the public is happier, Farage voters go away and Reform is toast!

You'd also free up 1000s of hospital beds because GPs are actually seeing patients instead of offloading them onto the hospitals....
Interesting but unfortunately the data doesn't really support this.

According to published data GP Practices saw 29.8 million appointments in March 2024 compared with 24.2 million in March 2019 – an increase of 5.6 million (23.1%) in 5 years. I did some research on GPs a few years ago and the number of GPs is slightly up but with more female GPs who, for family reasons work part time, so overall GP WTE is broadly static. Also many don't want to take on GP partnership roles as these are too risky financially etc. Some practices cant now work on a financial basis so are either closing down, amalgamating or being taken over by private sector companies. Also the UK population is rising so that the patient load per wte GP is increasing, from 1938 patients per GP to 2264 over the last 10 years. Given our pop demographic the percentage of these are increasing elderly and more dependent on care etc. Also long term conditions - cardiac, orthopedics, COPD, etc - have increased and are being managed in the community. Finally a lot of acute care has already been shifted from secondary to primary care to take pressure off hospitals, diabetes, COPD for example, so the range of work done in GP practices has increased.

Dentistry is more complicated and is about the contractual situation they face, some would argue reflecting a desire by the last Gov to destroy NHS dentistry and force it into the private sector. For many dentists it is financially impossible for them to continue solely as an NHS provider, the contract would see many lose money hence they either take on a mix of private/NHS work or else more completely to private work. In essence the contract doesn't pay per 'item of work' but for an arbitrary unit of dental activity which doesn't reflect the actual work involved. For example a dentist might get paid the same for a simple filling on one patient as they do for multiple fillings and extractions over a number of appointments for another patient. It is worth looking it up to understand the problems of the contract and why we are where we are! Labour promised a new contract when they came into power but we are still waiting, meanwhile tooth extractions is now the leading cause for kids being given a general anaesthetic in hospital.

There will inevitably be a % of lazy or money grabbers in both GP and dentistry, as there is in every industry, however the accusation of laziness isn't really one borne out by the facts I'm afraid.
User avatar
Sandstorm
Posts: 11667
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:05 pm
Location: England

dpedin wrote: Thu Feb 13, 2025 10:27 am
There will inevitably be a % of lazy or money grabbers in both GP and dentistry, as there is in every industry, however the accusation of laziness isn't really one borne out by the facts I'm afraid.
Interesting stats, thank-you.

However my point still stands: I see lazy GPs at my surgery (my boss's wife is the practice manager and she wants to throttle all 11 GPs where she works because they're "workshy cnuts"), plus my dentist has been taken over by 5 Thai women who spend 14 secs looking in your mouth and insisting you pay before you even turn up for the appointment. I have to fight to get an x-ray every 2 years!

My local NHS Authority is fucking shite and everyone round here bitches about "the immigrants taking all our appointments" incessantly.
Post Reply