Paddington Bear wrote: ↑Sat Mar 01, 2025 12:42 am
Gumboot wrote: ↑Fri Feb 28, 2025 11:16 pm
Niegs wrote: ↑Fri Feb 28, 2025 11:10 pm
Maybe it's too simplistic to say, but time for the world to stop leaning so much on America? Is that possible? Just a few million votes one way or the other in a country with 350m (1/3-ish of those eligible didn't bother?), swings the path of world politics.
Can Europe and friends ramp things up to fill the gaps, and even launch themselves forward?
Macron was derided by other European leaders for promoting this very approach for years. Not so much derision nowadays.
Too late now. A modest increase in defence spending particularly around industry in 2014 followed by a more substantial boost in 2022 may have given us the chance to run a different course. Plus of course a weaning or never being so beholden to Russian energy in the first place. From where we are now we can give Ukraine nothing but false hope, nothing but empty encouragement to send more men to die.
What Trump has done is a shameful abandonment of a nation that has shown so much courage and dignity in the face of unspeakable atrocities, but it’s too easy to pretend it is all his fault when we have done nearly nothing to allow another path to be taken bar offer empty words. I remember listening to an Indian general as Ukraine invaded tell a Ukrainian that the west would fight to the last Ukrainian, clearly correct then and clearly correct now.
Ukraine shoulders some responsibility as well. I went to a talk by a senior member of their elite this week who had the following solutions:
1. Britain to lead a task force of the Baltic, Scandis and Benelux in direct war with Russia
2. France to pile in once the front is stabilised
3. Risk of nuclear war to be ignored as ‘it won’t happen’
4. Peace to come from Ukraine reclaiming all occupied territory and Russia to be dismembered into 100 (genuinely) states along ethnic lines.
They have of course been led up the garden path but still having any dream of peace that doesn’t involve a serious think about what territory they can give up is sadly totally delusional and a lot of us left this talk very disillusioned. Can’t help but feel a total collapse is coming
There's no indication Putin stops at Ukraine. If there was a way for Europe to back out of the entire thing they would've. It's not just Ukraine which has been led up the garden path.
Trump has done immense damage. He is beyond reason and irrational, both Macron and Starmer corrected him on his $350bn figure, then he again repeated it too Zelensky who was so shouted down by that point he remained silent. Trump's biggest failing is he has displayed weakness, what happened yesterday was the latest display of weakness he mistakes for strength. His commitment to article 5 looks limited at best, the nuclear deterrent isn't credible now. He likes Putin and gets on well with him.
Zelensky is a moderate, he wanted peace before the full scale invasion and didn't even mobilise his troops before the invasion because he was so committed to that. He's a Russian speaker and ethnic Jew, he's not a diehard Ukrainian nationalist. As you discovered at the talk, there's Ukrainians happy to go to the last Ukrainian too (not convinced Zelensky is one of those). Zelensky reached the position of giving up land to Russia and resources to the US, but Trump wanted rump Ukraine to remain unprotected. How likely is it Zelensky could sell that to Ukrainians? Would Putin accept and definitely not have another go?
Because the US has shifted all the focus onto Zelensky and Ukraine, not many people are asking "would Putin ever accept any of these deals?". The answer is he may of if he had been forced to negotiate rather than immediately given everything and shown that the US is weak. Putin now knows exactly what the US commitment to Europe is. Every time they meet Trump, Russia's best analysts are there with Putin mining him and plugging that into their scenario planning. To a certain type of man weakness is extremely provocative, Putin isn't agreeing to anything now.
Russia is now running a war economy and all in has maybe around 1.5m men under arms (active and those it can call on). If Russia isn't bled in Ukraine the gamble is they come off a war footing and don't try again. The additional gamble would be if they go again it's in Ukraine. I know of no wargame where the Baltics survive a Russian invasion even with US forces involved.
I may make a bigger post/s about this on the other thread. But because the nuclear deterrent now isn't credible (indeed there's doubt about any US support) the worst case scenario now ends in a nuclear exchange in central/eastern Europe. The best case is the one Trump just rejected and we don't even know if Putin would accept.