Enzedder wrote: Sat Mar 15, 2025 6:24 am Sean Stevenson has shown what a loss he will be.
And the PA has been turned right up for this game

Yeah, the loathsome PA creatures are still off the leash.
By Loe, I gather you mean Roe. And Preston has had a couple of games in super, and think Hotham when fit will put him back on bench for Crusaders, and will make ABs ahead of him. Though see your point on whether he will make ABs again, though I will be surprised if Roe get's a test.Kiwias wrote: Sat Mar 15, 2025 7:55 am Roigard, Ratima, Loe, Preston -- maybe the ABs won't have to go to Christie again
Wouldn't that because he not a bad kicker, and also Perofeta having first run after a calf injury? Perhaps wanting to not let him kick just yet, and not in anyway convinced he would of got as close as Taele anyway.Gumboot wrote: Sat Mar 15, 2025 8:03 am Wonder why the newbie Taele took the Blues' last conversion attempt when Perofeta was on the field.
He had also already slotted a kick, albeit a much easier conversion. But I see Gumboots point - he was given a lot of responsibility for a debutant, I was actually very surprised that Lam was dropped to make way for him since I thought Lam had a decent game v the Brumbies.Dan54 wrote: Tue Mar 18, 2025 7:11 amWouldn't that because he not a bad kicker, and also Perofeta having first run after a calf injury? Perhaps wanting to not let him kick just yet, and not in anyway convinced he would of got as close as Taele anyway.Gumboot wrote: Sat Mar 15, 2025 8:03 am Wonder why the newbie Taele took the Blues' last conversion attempt when Perofeta was on the field.
Yep, that was my point. He had a strong game and is clearly very talented, but handing him the last-minute deciding kick was asking a lot, imho. Especially with other, more experienced kickers on the park.Hugo wrote: Tue Mar 18, 2025 1:46 pmHe had also already slotted a kick, albeit a much easier conversion. But I see Gumboots point - he was given a lot of responsibility for a debutant, I was actually very surprised that Lam was dropped to make way for him since I thought Lam had a decent game v the Brumbies.Dan54 wrote: Tue Mar 18, 2025 7:11 amWouldn't that because he not a bad kicker, and also Perofeta having first run after a calf injury? Perhaps wanting to not let him kick just yet, and not in anyway convinced he would of got as close as Taele anyway.Gumboot wrote: Sat Mar 15, 2025 8:03 am Wonder why the newbie Taele took the Blues' last conversion attempt when Perofeta was on the field.
Lam wasn't dropped, he played on wing, where he's played a lot of his rugby. I think it was fairly late in week when Clarke pulled out. I actually was real impressed with the kid at 12, looked probably to have the makings of a good one there, very much a playmaking 2nd five rather than the crash and bash inside centre style.Hugo wrote: Tue Mar 18, 2025 1:46 pmHe had also already slotted a kick, albeit a much easier conversion. But I see Gumboots point - he was given a lot of responsibility for a debutant, I was actually very surprised that Lam was dropped to make way for him since I thought Lam had a decent game v the Brumbies.Dan54 wrote: Tue Mar 18, 2025 7:11 amWouldn't that because he not a bad kicker, and also Perofeta having first run after a calf injury? Perhaps wanting to not let him kick just yet, and not in anyway convinced he would of got as close as Taele anyway.Gumboot wrote: Sat Mar 15, 2025 8:03 am Wonder why the newbie Taele took the Blues' last conversion attempt when Perofeta was on the field.
I said dropped in the sense that when the Blues announced their team earlier in the week he was on the bench in favour of Taele. Then when Clarke was declared injured he was moved from the bench onto the wing. I agree I think he looked decent and that was the best 80 minutes that the Blues have put together (attacking wise) this season imo.Dan54 wrote: Tue Mar 18, 2025 6:54 pmLam wasn't dropped, he played on wing, where he's played a lot of his rugby. I think it was fairly late in week when Clarke pulled out. I actually was real impressed with the kid at 12, looked probably to have the makings of a good one there, very much a playmaking 2nd five rather than the crash and bash inside centre style.Hugo wrote: Tue Mar 18, 2025 1:46 pmHe had also already slotted a kick, albeit a much easier conversion. But I see Gumboots point - he was given a lot of responsibility for a debutant, I was actually very surprised that Lam was dropped to make way for him since I thought Lam had a decent game v the Brumbies.Dan54 wrote: Tue Mar 18, 2025 7:11 am
Wouldn't that because he not a bad kicker, and also Perofeta having first run after a calf injury? Perhaps wanting to not let him kick just yet, and not in anyway convinced he would of got as close as Taele anyway.
I think I still believe he was better option to take kick, as perhaps after watching Perofeta over the years for the Naki etc, I not sure he would of got that close ?
Agreed. He was probably the only player in that Saders backline that had a sub par game but sticking with him is the right call.Guy Smiley wrote: Wed Mar 19, 2025 3:44 am Hotham named on the bench for the Saders this week and they've stuck by Kemara to start after a bit of a forgettable game last weekend which, I think, is a good thing. Back your players.
![]()
Piss weak from Super Rugby Pacific too... swept under the carpet and slam the door behind it.The Chiefs have been hit with a fine after a member of their medical team interfered with the allotted time for a conversion in their one-point Super Rugby Pacific victory over the Blues in Hamilton last weekend.
The Herald has viewed footage of a Chiefs staff member, wearing a red medical bib, booting the ball away after Blues wing Mark Tele’a scored in the corner in the 39th minute. Blues playmaker Harry Plummer missed the subsequent sideline conversion.
The same member of the Chiefs medical team is understood to have kicked the ball away again after Blues utility Corey Evans scored in the 50th minute. Despite the interference, Plummer successfully converted Evans’ try.
In an effort to minimise stoppages, goal kickers in Super Rugby Pacific are allocated 60 seconds from the time the referee awards the try to complete the conversion. The same timeframe is allocated for penalty kicks.
A Super Rugby Pacific spokesperson confirmed the Chiefs were punished for the interference. The Herald understands that sanction has resulted in an undisclosed fine.
“Super Rugby Pacific management has sanctioned the Chiefs following their round 5 match against the Blues for a breach of the World Rugby technical zone and water carriers protocol, as detailed in section 4.2 of the 2025 Super Rugby Pacific tournament manual,” A Super Rugby Pacific spokesperson said.
“Specifically, the Chiefs were found to have contravened clause 4.2.2.h: Medical personnel or water runners may enter the field of play in accordance with the law. They must not obstruct, interfere or make contact with any player from an opposing team, match officials or interfere with play.
“The matter has been finalised and no further comment will be made.”
The Chiefs have trumped the Blues twice this season – 25-14 in round one at Eden Park and in last Saturday’s knife-edge 32-21 victory.
Chiefs chief executive Simon Graafhuis acknowledged the incidents in Hamilton, which are sure to stoke neighbouring tensions should the rivals meet again in this year’s playoffs.
“We have co-operated fully with Sanzaar on this matter and accept responsibility for the technical breach and the outcome of this process,” Graafhuis said. “As this is an employment matter, we will not be making any further comment.”
Blues chief executive Andrew Hore said: “The Blues were aware of this situation occurring and have noted that Sanzaar has dealt with it accordingly.”
Ok I understand what you meant Hugo, I think it was in general just rotation etc. Gathered that Cotter had been looking at giving Taele a start.Hugo wrote: Tue Mar 18, 2025 8:28 pmI said dropped in the sense that when the Blues announced their team earlier in the week he was on the bench in favour of Taele. Then when Clarke was declared injured he was moved from the bench onto the wing. I agree I think he looked decent and that was the best 80 minutes that the Blues have put together (attacking wise) this season imo.Dan54 wrote: Tue Mar 18, 2025 6:54 pmLam wasn't dropped, he played on wing, where he's played a lot of his rugby. I think it was fairly late in week when Clarke pulled out. I actually was real impressed with the kid at 12, looked probably to have the makings of a good one there, very much a playmaking 2nd five rather than the crash and bash inside centre style.Hugo wrote: Tue Mar 18, 2025 1:46 pm
He had also already slotted a kick, albeit a much easier conversion. But I see Gumboots point - he was given a lot of responsibility for a debutant, I was actually very surprised that Lam was dropped to make way for him since I thought Lam had a decent game v the Brumbies.
I think I still believe he was better option to take kick, as perhaps after watching Perofeta over the years for the Naki etc, I not sure he would of got that close ?
Interesting that, a bit like someone getting in way and touching ball to prevent quick throw in, that used to happen a bit, and I think have still seen it in couple of club games from up north this year.Guy Smiley wrote: Thu Mar 20, 2025 6:46 am The Chiefs have been fined for cheating.
I reckon they should have to forfeit the result. Twice in one game ( a one pointer ) is clearly premeditated.
They need to get over the inferiority complex, playing wonderful sparkling rugby and still thinking in the gutter.
https://www.nzherald.co.nz/sport/rugby/ ... GHVGXDZWY/
Piss weak from Super Rugby Pacific too... swept under the carpet and slam the door behind it.The Chiefs have been hit with a fine after a member of their medical team interfered with the allotted time for a conversion in their one-point Super Rugby Pacific victory over the Blues in Hamilton last weekend.
The Herald has viewed footage of a Chiefs staff member, wearing a red medical bib, booting the ball away after Blues wing Mark Tele’a scored in the corner in the 39th minute. Blues playmaker Harry Plummer missed the subsequent sideline conversion.
The same member of the Chiefs medical team is understood to have kicked the ball away again after Blues utility Corey Evans scored in the 50th minute. Despite the interference, Plummer successfully converted Evans’ try.
In an effort to minimise stoppages, goal kickers in Super Rugby Pacific are allocated 60 seconds from the time the referee awards the try to complete the conversion. The same timeframe is allocated for penalty kicks.
A Super Rugby Pacific spokesperson confirmed the Chiefs were punished for the interference. The Herald understands that sanction has resulted in an undisclosed fine.
“Super Rugby Pacific management has sanctioned the Chiefs following their round 5 match against the Blues for a breach of the World Rugby technical zone and water carriers protocol, as detailed in section 4.2 of the 2025 Super Rugby Pacific tournament manual,” A Super Rugby Pacific spokesperson said.
“Specifically, the Chiefs were found to have contravened clause 4.2.2.h: Medical personnel or water runners may enter the field of play in accordance with the law. They must not obstruct, interfere or make contact with any player from an opposing team, match officials or interfere with play.
“The matter has been finalised and no further comment will be made.”
The Chiefs have trumped the Blues twice this season – 25-14 in round one at Eden Park and in last Saturday’s knife-edge 32-21 victory.
Chiefs chief executive Simon Graafhuis acknowledged the incidents in Hamilton, which are sure to stoke neighbouring tensions should the rivals meet again in this year’s playoffs.
“We have co-operated fully with Sanzaar on this matter and accept responsibility for the technical breach and the outcome of this process,” Graafhuis said. “As this is an employment matter, we will not be making any further comment.”
Blues chief executive Andrew Hore said: “The Blues were aware of this situation occurring and have noted that Sanzaar has dealt with it accordingly.”
This game was originally planned to be played in Tonga right? Is the reason it is in Pukekohe because it is halfway between Albany and Hamilton or just so it can be played elsewhere in the region?Gumboot wrote: Fri Mar 21, 2025 5:34 am The weather's looking good in Pukekohe. Should be about 20 at kickoff, so hopefully no dew.
Dan54 wrote: Fri Mar 21, 2025 2:27 amOk I understand what you meant Hugo, I think it was in general just rotation etc. Gathered that Cotter had been looking at giving Taele a start.Hugo wrote: Tue Mar 18, 2025 8:28 pmI said dropped in the sense that when the Blues announced their team earlier in the week he was on the bench in favour of Taele. Then when Clarke was declared injured he was moved from the bench onto the wing. I agree I think he looked decent and that was the best 80 minutes that the Blues have put together (attacking wise) this season imo.Dan54 wrote: Tue Mar 18, 2025 6:54 pm
Lam wasn't dropped, he played on wing, where he's played a lot of his rugby. I think it was fairly late in week when Clarke pulled out. I actually was real impressed with the kid at 12, looked probably to have the makings of a good one there, very much a playmaking 2nd five rather than the crash and bash inside centre style.
I think I still believe he was better option to take kick, as perhaps after watching Perofeta over the years for the Naki etc, I not sure he would of got that close ?
This is not too bad, on Safari but not working on Brave
Rugby continues to do itself no favours. Better than football.....Guy Smiley wrote: Thu Mar 20, 2025 6:46 am The Chiefs have been fined for cheating.
I reckon they should have to forfeit the result. Twice in one game ( a one pointer ) is clearly premeditated.
They need to get over the inferiority complex, playing wonderful sparkling rugby and still thinking in the gutter.
https://www.nzherald.co.nz/sport/rugby/ ... GHVGXDZWY/
Piss weak from Super Rugby Pacific too... swept under the carpet and slam the door behind it.The Chiefs have been hit with a fine after a member of their medical team interfered with the allotted time for a conversion in their one-point Super Rugby Pacific victory over the Blues in Hamilton last weekend.
The Herald has viewed footage of a Chiefs staff member, wearing a red medical bib, booting the ball away after Blues wing Mark Tele’a scored in the corner in the 39th minute. Blues playmaker Harry Plummer missed the subsequent sideline conversion.
The same member of the Chiefs medical team is understood to have kicked the ball away again after Blues utility Corey Evans scored in the 50th minute. Despite the interference, Plummer successfully converted Evans’ try.
In an effort to minimise stoppages, goal kickers in Super Rugby Pacific are allocated 60 seconds from the time the referee awards the try to complete the conversion. The same timeframe is allocated for penalty kicks.
A Super Rugby Pacific spokesperson confirmed the Chiefs were punished for the interference. The Herald understands that sanction has resulted in an undisclosed fine.
“Super Rugby Pacific management has sanctioned the Chiefs following their round 5 match against the Blues for a breach of the World Rugby technical zone and water carriers protocol, as detailed in section 4.2 of the 2025 Super Rugby Pacific tournament manual,” A Super Rugby Pacific spokesperson said.
“Specifically, the Chiefs were found to have contravened clause 4.2.2.h: Medical personnel or water runners may enter the field of play in accordance with the law. They must not obstruct, interfere or make contact with any player from an opposing team, match officials or interfere with play.
“The matter has been finalised and no further comment will be made.”
The Chiefs have trumped the Blues twice this season – 25-14 in round one at Eden Park and in last Saturday’s knife-edge 32-21 victory.
Chiefs chief executive Simon Graafhuis acknowledged the incidents in Hamilton, which are sure to stoke neighbouring tensions should the rivals meet again in this year’s playoffs.
“We have co-operated fully with Sanzaar on this matter and accept responsibility for the technical breach and the outcome of this process,” Graafhuis said. “As this is an employment matter, we will not be making any further comment.”
Blues chief executive Andrew Hore said: “The Blues were aware of this situation occurring and have noted that Sanzaar has dealt with it accordingly.”
Cheers, but I found a stable one at HT.Torquemada 1420 wrote: Fri Mar 21, 2025 7:21 amhttps://www.vipbox.lc/rugby/moana-pasif ... efs-1-live
But you need adblockers.