https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/5/4/e006577
Laboratory tests showed the penetration of particles through the cloth masks to be very high (97%) compared with medical masks (44%) (used in trial) and 3M 9320 N95 (<0.01%), 3M Vflex 9105 N95 (0.1%).
So, coronavirus...
-
- Posts: 1731
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:49 pm
Bimbowomxn wrote: ↑Tue Oct 20, 2020 11:21 am
https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/5/4/e006577
Laboratory tests showed the penetration of particles through the cloth masks to be very high (97%) compared with medical masks (44%) (used in trial) and 3M 9320 N95 (<0.01%), 3M Vflex 9105 N95 (0.1%).
You really need to read the updates and the responses to that five year old article before posting it as any kind of proof again.
-
- Posts: 1731
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:49 pm
Tichtheid wrote: ↑Tue Oct 20, 2020 11:28 amBimbowomxn wrote: ↑Tue Oct 20, 2020 11:21 am
https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/5/4/e006577
Laboratory tests showed the penetration of particles through the cloth masks to be very high (97%) compared with medical masks (44%) (used in trial) and 3M 9320 N95 (<0.01%), 3M Vflex 9105 N95 (0.1%).
You really need to read the updates and the responses to that five year old article before posting it as any kind of proof again.
Were the measurements wrong then ?
He is? Oh good. That means every person on the planet of all ages can stop worrying too.Bimbowomxn wrote: ↑Tue Oct 20, 2020 11:20 amGlaston wrote: ↑Tue Oct 20, 2020 11:17 am Another person to have Covid twice
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/cycling/54612253
Positive in Feb and positive now.
Bit worrying.completely asymptomatic".
Toolbag.
Jesus, that is a silly post.Sandstorm wrote: ↑Tue Oct 20, 2020 10:54 amThe average age of a Lions touring fan (fag packet calculation) is probably 60+. Any of you Euros fancy catching Covid and having to be treated in a Johannesburg hospital?Saint wrote: ↑Tue Oct 20, 2020 10:50 amNot cancelled yet. i don;t see them cancelling this till a lot closer to teh time - if there's a vaccine (even if only partially effective) and better treatments, together with some sort of rapid testing available, then it will go ahead. If not they'll only cancel 1-2 months before
I suspect your travel insurance will cost as much as the rest of your trip.
Admittedly, you probably wouldn't want to be treated at Baragwanath or Helen Josepth, but it's unlikely that any rugby fans would end up there, anyway and the private hospitals, where you would be sent are probably at least the equal of any of your NHS centres.
Why would travel insurance be any more expensive in South Africa than anywhere else?
Bimbowomxn wrote: ↑Tue Oct 20, 2020 11:48 am
Were the measurements wrong then ?
Read the updates
-
- Posts: 1731
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:49 pm
Sandstorm wrote: ↑Tue Oct 20, 2020 11:48 amHe is? Oh good. That means every person on the planet of all ages can stop worrying too.Bimbowomxn wrote: ↑Tue Oct 20, 2020 11:20 amGlaston wrote: ↑Tue Oct 20, 2020 11:17 am Another person to have Covid twice
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/cycling/54612253
Positive in Feb and positive now.
Bit worrying.completely asymptomatic".
Toolbag.
Well of the 100’s of millions infected it telling that the handful that have been reinfected are not at risk.
Of course it's silly. But there's no reason to make Lions fans feel safe or comfortable. This is Serious Business.Rinkals wrote: ↑Tue Oct 20, 2020 11:48 am
Jesus, that is a silly post.
Admittedly, you probably wouldn't want to be treated at Baragwanath or Helen Josepth, but it's unlikely that any rugby fans would end up there, anyway and the private hospitals, where you would be sent are probably at least the equal of any of your NHS centres.
I never said travel insurance to SA would be more expensive than anywhere else. I said it will probably be much more expensive than 2017 Lions insurance due to Covid.Why would travel insurance be any more expensive in South Africa than anywhere else?
-
- Posts: 1731
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:49 pm
Why would travel insurance be any more expensive in South Africa than anywhere else?
The horrendous crime rate as a starting point.
Now see what you've done,Bimbowomxn wrote: ↑Tue Oct 20, 2020 11:55 amWhy would travel insurance be any more expensive in South Africa than anywhere else?
The horrendous crime rate as a starting point.
Bimbo is going to be convinced that 99% of all tourists to South Africa never make it back alive.
-
- Posts: 1731
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:49 pm
Rinkals wrote: ↑Tue Oct 20, 2020 12:23 pmNow see what you've done,Bimbowomxn wrote: ↑Tue Oct 20, 2020 11:55 amWhy would travel insurance be any more expensive in South Africa than anywhere else?
The horrendous crime rate as a starting point.
Bimbo is going to be convinced that 99% of all tourists to South Africa never make it back alive.
I think denying SA has a bit of a crime problem might be a stretch even for you.
Tichtheid wrote: ↑Tue Oct 20, 2020 11:49 am
Read the updates
The devil is in the detail.......................
When 85% of the viruses found in laboratory tests were rhinoviruses, which are about four times smaller than SARS-CoV2, no conclusion from this article can be applied to COVID-19/SARS-CoV2.
Bimbowomxn wrote: ↑Tue Oct 20, 2020 1:04 pm
I think denying SA has a bit of a crime problem might be a stretch even for you.
And where did I say that?
Christ, Bimbo, you really are desperate.
Sure, we have a crime problem, but a huge proportion of crime in this country is inflicted on blacks by fellow blacks. Tourists are unlikely to go to areas where crime is that rampant.
But, you are obviously the expert: I just live here.
-
- Posts: 1731
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:49 pm
Rinkals wrote: ↑Tue Oct 20, 2020 2:07 pmBimbowomxn wrote: ↑Tue Oct 20, 2020 1:04 pm
I think denying SA has a bit of a crime problem might be a stretch even for you.
And where did I say that?
Christ, Bimbo, you really are desperate.
Sure, we have a crime problem, but a huge proportion of crime in this country is inflicted on blacks by fellow blacks. Tourists are unlikely to go to areas where crime is that rampant.
But, you are obviously the expert: I just live here.
I’ve no idea why insurance is so high then.
Perfectly safe.
Ovals wrote: ↑Tue Oct 20, 2020 1:23 pm
The devil is in the detail.......................
When 85% of the viruses found in laboratory tests were rhinoviruses, which are about four times smaller than SARS-CoV2, no conclusion from this article can be applied to COVID-19/SARS-CoV2.
Yup, and that is only part of the problem with posting that five year old study which is really not relevant to the current pandemic.
However, I'm sure that won't matter a jot.
-
- Posts: 1731
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:49 pm
Let’s see what the Danish study says.
Or why the UK scientists were so sure about masks in April (there’s been no real controlled experiments since).
Masks (especially amateurs made and fitted cloth);, do nothing.
Or why the UK scientists were so sure about masks in April (there’s been no real controlled experiments since).
Masks (especially amateurs made and fitted cloth);, do nothing.
There's absolutely no point in discussing anything with the Dumbot - which is why I have him on ignore over here. But, occasionally, it's fun to take the piss out of him and the stupid stuff he comes up with.Tichtheid wrote: ↑Tue Oct 20, 2020 2:19 pm
Yup, and that is only part of the problem with posting that five year old study which is really not relevant to the current pandemic.
However, I'm sure that won't matter a jot.
-
- Posts: 1731
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:49 pm
Another thing no-ones focussing on. If you read the SAGE minutes, they specifically state that the fact we continue to apply overlapping interventions makes it difficult, if not impossible, to asses which may be effective, and which aren’t.
- Insane_Homer
- Posts: 5389
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:14 pm
- Location: Leafy Surrey
20,330 new cases
241 deaths
241 deaths
“Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true.”
-
- Posts: 1731
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:49 pm
30,000 short of the predictions.....
-
- Posts: 1731
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:49 pm
Bimbowomxn wrote: ↑Tue Oct 20, 2020 4:07 pm
30,000 short of the predictions.....
Edit, and comparatively good news
- Insane_Homer
- Posts: 5389
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:14 pm
- Location: Leafy Surrey
He got this wrong tooSir Patrick Vallance said that would be expected to lead to about "200-plus deaths per day" a month after that.
“Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true.”
Are you now supporting the Sage meeting outputs?Bimbowomxn wrote: ↑Tue Oct 20, 2020 2:40 pmAnother thing no-ones focussing on. If you read the SAGE minutes, they specifically state that the fact we continue to apply overlapping interventions makes it difficult, if not impossible, to asses which may be effective, and which aren’t.
-
- Posts: 1731
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:49 pm
Insane_Homer wrote: ↑Tue Oct 20, 2020 4:57 pmHe got this wrong tooSir Patrick Vallance said that would be expected to lead to about "200-plus deaths per day" a month after that.
Grasping at straws again, mr 50,000 ......
If though he’s correct is he going to alter the IFR rate wrongly assumed in the Govt models?
I have him on ignore too, but occasionally I feel the need to remind everyone that he's a cretin, just in case anyone new has wandered onto the board and doesn't know.Ovals wrote: ↑Tue Oct 20, 2020 2:26 pmThere's absolutely no point in discussing anything with the Dumbot - which is why I have him on ignore over here. But, occasionally, it's fun to take the piss out of him and the stupid stuff he comes up with.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
-
- Posts: 1731
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:49 pm
Doesn’t stop me correcting biffers dribble.
- Insane_Homer
- Posts: 5389
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:14 pm
- Location: Leafy Surrey
Fanatically delusion. PS I'm not your once lauded Chris Whittey.
“Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true.”
I mean, youtube is normally a den of nutbars, but the sheer weight of anti-Covid safety measures following this news story about Halloween restrictions is staggering.
No comments here, but this includes a second doctor saying trick-or-treating should be 'low risk'. Is it though? Could you not have some superspreaders distributing Covid-covered candies? Parents could quarantine the candy for three days, I guess, but I'm sure some parents would end up dead by their kids' hands if that was attempted.
No comments here, but this includes a second doctor saying trick-or-treating should be 'low risk'. Is it though? Could you not have some superspreaders distributing Covid-covered candies? Parents could quarantine the candy for three days, I guess, but I'm sure some parents would end up dead by their kids' hands if that was attempted.
-
- Posts: 1731
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:49 pm
Insane_Homer wrote: ↑Tue Oct 20, 2020 6:32 pm Fanatically delusion. PS I'm not your once lauded Chris Whittey.
Indeed you’re a cheap agenda driven sensationalist repeating his nonsense like a government shrill.
A version of Piers Morgan without the personal charm
If anyone is generating nonsense on here, it's you.Bimbowomxn wrote: ↑Tue Oct 20, 2020 8:12 pmInsane_Homer wrote: ↑Tue Oct 20, 2020 6:32 pm Fanatically delusion. PS I'm not your once lauded Chris Whittey.
Indeed you’re a cheap agenda driven sensationalist repeating his nonsense like a government shrill.
A version of Piers Morgan without the personal charm
Homer is using figures and data to expose the hypocrisy in Johnson's government.
If you feel that the figures are wrong, then you should demonstrate where they err.
This "you hates us" schtick is weak and unappealing.
-
- Posts: 1731
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:49 pm
Rinkals wrote: ↑Wed Oct 21, 2020 4:30 amIf anyone is generating nonsense on here, it's you.Bimbowomxn wrote: ↑Tue Oct 20, 2020 8:12 pmInsane_Homer wrote: ↑Tue Oct 20, 2020 6:32 pm Fanatically delusion. PS I'm not your once lauded Chris Whittey.
Indeed you’re a cheap agenda driven sensationalist repeating his nonsense like a government shrill.
A version of Piers Morgan without the personal charm
Homer is using figures and data to expose the hypocrisy in Johnson's government.
If you feel that the figures are wrong, then you should demonstrate where they err.
This "you hates us" schtick is weak and unappealing.
I don’t need to demonstrate anything about the 50,000 cases a day . That much is obvious.
- Insane_Homer
- Posts: 5389
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:14 pm
- Location: Leafy Surrey
The shameless lack of self awareness is astounding & frighteningly comical.
“Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true.”