Coronavirus: NHS staff flock to anti-vax group
Emma Yeomans | Kat Lay, Health Editor
Monday November 16 2020, 12.01am, The Times
Hundreds of NHS and care home staff have formed a group opposed to vaccinations, wearing masks and testing in hospitals.
The group, NHS Workers for Choice, No Restrictions for Declining a Vaccine, has gained more than 250 Facebook members in a month. They include a GP, several accident and emergency nurses, healthcare assistants, lab workers, and private and public care home staff.
It says it is not an anti-vaccine group and exists to support healthcare workers, but The Times found posts saying that the Pfizer-BionTech coronavirus vaccine was a new frozen virus, similar to smallpox, to be “unleashed” on the world. They compared it to “poison”.
One member who works in a GP’s surgery, said that she would rather quit than help with a vaccination
Julie Coffey, a Sheffield GP, has refused to wear a mask in shops and says coronavirus vaccines are being rushed through without proper safety checks
So, coronavirus...
What’s this all about?
250 members does not equal 250 nhs workers.
I went to university with med students, i trust their ability to pair symptoms with illnesses but not their ability to understand the how's and why's in many cases.
I went to university with med students, i trust their ability to pair symptoms with illnesses but not their ability to understand the how's and why's in many cases.
Give a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.
-
- Posts: 642
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 10:11 am
That rune-style necklace is a bit of a red flag if someone's talking about vaccines
Lemoentjie wrote: Mon Nov 16, 2020 9:01 am That rune-style necklace is a bit of a red flag if someone's talking about vaccines

You might have a point if he wasn't right in this case.Bimbowomxn wrote: Mon Nov 16, 2020 7:27 amC69 wrote: Sun Nov 15, 2020 10:16 pm So specifically which posters do you think you are stopping being scared?
Who are you saving?
Such a hero and saviour.
I am sure posters will let us know if they feel they are less scared now, as you assert after reading your posts.
Mr Narcissism please tell us who are these scared posters?
An accusation of narcissism from Mr “we are overwhelmed “ but look at me !
Irony has died on that one.
How about you answer the question?
Moderna vaccine is reported as having the same kind of effectiveness as the BioNTech, or even better - 95% figure given.
This vaccine can be stored at -20C for six months and in a regular fridge for a month.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-54902908
This vaccine can be stored at -20C for six months and in a regular fridge for a month.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-54902908
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
- Longshanks
- Posts: 573
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 6:52 pm
Pfizer share price will drop thenBiffer wrote: Mon Nov 16, 2020 12:22 pm Moderna vaccine is reported as having the same kind of effectiveness as the BioNTech, or even better - 95% figure given.
This vaccine can be stored at -20C for six months and in a regular fridge for a month.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-54902908
Great news though
Doubt it, no reasonable investor would have made a big bet on Pfizer being the only vaccine. They're traded in the US, so we'll find out when they open. UK markets generally taken another boost on this news.Longshanks wrote: Mon Nov 16, 2020 1:08 pmPfizer share price will drop thenBiffer wrote: Mon Nov 16, 2020 12:22 pm Moderna vaccine is reported as having the same kind of effectiveness as the BioNTech, or even better - 95% figure given.
This vaccine can be stored at -20C for six months and in a regular fridge for a month.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-54902908
Great news though
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
-
- Posts: 1731
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:49 pm
How do they know it can be stored safely for 6 months.
Through stability trialling throughout the development
Cue lots of vague innuendo and pointing out things that he thinks are clever but are already covered by standard biotech methodologies he doesn't understand.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
-
- Posts: 1731
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:49 pm
Would this be normal or would they normally test it over a longer period of time.?
It clearly hasn’t been tested over 6 months.
- Longshanks
- Posts: 573
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 6:52 pm
Considering the share price rose 15% on the day of their announcement of the vaccine, it may.Biffer wrote: Mon Nov 16, 2020 1:24 pmDoubt it, no reasonable investor would have made a big bet on Pfizer being the only vaccine. They're traded in the US, so we'll find out when they open. UK markets generally taken another boost on this news.Longshanks wrote: Mon Nov 16, 2020 1:08 pmPfizer share price will drop thenBiffer wrote: Mon Nov 16, 2020 12:22 pm Moderna vaccine is reported as having the same kind of effectiveness as the BioNTech, or even better - 95% figure given.
This vaccine can be stored at -20C for six months and in a regular fridge for a month.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-54902908
Great news though
But who cares apart from investors, just great news.
Looking forward to hearing about Oxford soon
-
- Posts: 2450
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 4:04 pm
And one assumes this isn't as such new technology
-
- Posts: 1731
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:49 pm
Rhubarb & Custard wrote: Mon Nov 16, 2020 2:15 pmAnd one assumes this isn't as such new technology
It’s the first vaccine of its type .... completely new technology.
-
- Posts: 2450
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 4:04 pm
Bimbowomxn wrote: Mon Nov 16, 2020 2:16 pm
It’s the first vaccine of its type .... completely new technology.
So this isn't a messenger RNA vaccine?
-
- Posts: 1731
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:49 pm
Rhubarb & Custard wrote: Mon Nov 16, 2020 2:21 pmBimbowomxn wrote: Mon Nov 16, 2020 2:16 pm
It’s the first vaccine of its type .... completely new technology.
So this isn't a messenger RNA vaccine?
Sorry, I’ll be clear for the hard of thinking these would be the first RNA vaccines in human use with all previous efforts failing. The tech used is new.
-
- Posts: 2450
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 4:04 pm
Bimbowomxn wrote: Mon Nov 16, 2020 2:25 pmRhubarb & Custard wrote: Mon Nov 16, 2020 2:21 pmBimbowomxn wrote: Mon Nov 16, 2020 2:16 pm
It’s the first vaccine of its type .... completely new technology.
So this isn't a messenger RNA vaccine?
Sorry, I’ll be clear for the hard of thinking these would be the first RNA vaccines in human use with all previous efforts failing. The tech used is new.
You'd do better being quiet than trying to be clear, as clearly you've no idea what you're talking about. There's sort of some semblance of a point in there, but it's not useful or accurate commentary you're making.
-
- Posts: 1731
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:49 pm
You'd do better being quiet than trying to be clear, as clearly you've no idea what you're talking about. There's sort of some semblance of a point in there, but it's not useful or accurate commentary you're making.
I’ll be quite when you inform me about all the other RNA vaccines being used by humans then ?
Either way splitting hairs regarding previous failures to try and mis describe the vaccines is no semblance of a,point.this point in fact
The technology is very new.And one assumes this isn't as such new technology
- fishfoodie
- Posts: 8899
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm
You're hardly surprised that the douche nozzle is going full anti-vaxxer now, are you ?Rhubarb & Custard wrote: Mon Nov 16, 2020 2:31 pmBimbowomxn wrote: Mon Nov 16, 2020 2:25 pm
Sorry, I’ll be clear for the hard of thinking these would be the first RNA vaccines in human use with all previous efforts failing. The tech used is new.
You'd do better being quiet than trying to be clear, as clearly you've no idea what you're talking about. There's sort of some semblance of a point in there, but it's not useful or accurate commentary you're making.
Bimbot has already bet all his algorithms on herd immunity.fishfoodie wrote: Mon Nov 16, 2020 3:06 pm You're hardly surprised that the douche nozzle is going full anti-vaxxer now, are you ?
He is the recognised expert, after all.fishfoodie wrote: Mon Nov 16, 2020 3:06 pmYou're hardly surprised that the douche nozzle is going full anti-vaxxer now, are you ?Rhubarb & Custard wrote: Mon Nov 16, 2020 2:31 pmBimbowomxn wrote: Mon Nov 16, 2020 2:25 pm
Sorry, I’ll be clear for the hard of thinking these would be the first RNA vaccines in human use with all previous efforts failing. The tech used is new.
You'd do better being quiet than trying to be clear, as clearly you've no idea what you're talking about. There's sort of some semblance of a point in there, but it's not useful or accurate commentary you're making.
In his own mind, if nobody else's.
-
- Posts: 1731
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:49 pm
God that’s a stupid assertion even by your cretinous standards.fishfoodie wrote: Mon Nov 16, 2020 3:06 pmYou're hardly surprised that the douche nozzle is going full anti-vaxxer now, are you ?Rhubarb & Custard wrote: Mon Nov 16, 2020 2:31 pmBimbowomxn wrote: Mon Nov 16, 2020 2:25 pm
Sorry, I’ll be clear for the hard of thinking these would be the first RNA vaccines in human use with all previous efforts failing. The tech used is new.
You'd do better being quiet than trying to be clear, as clearly you've no idea what you're talking about. There's sort of some semblance of a point in there, but it's not useful or accurate commentary you're making.
-
- Posts: 1731
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:49 pm
Currently the authorities are questioning the safety of the various vaccines. According to posters here that makes them “anti vaccines “. 

- Insane_Homer
- Posts: 5541
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:14 pm
- Location: Leafy Surrey
Best reporting!Due to technical difficulties we are unable to update the dashboard before 6pm.
“Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true.”
You'll have to masterbate over something else instead.Insane_Homer wrote: Mon Nov 16, 2020 4:30 pmBest reporting!Due to technical difficulties we are unable to update the dashboard before 6pm.
- Longshanks
- Posts: 573
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 6:52 pm
Back in February many scientists were saying we were unlikely to see a successful covid vaccine
Today 4 are claiming they work and are safe, and that's without lots of others in development.
Maybe we'll also get a cure for the common cold out of this too.
Today 4 are claiming they work and are safe, and that's without lots of others in development.
Maybe we'll also get a cure for the common cold out of this too.
You’ve got to hand it to TrumpLongshanks wrote: Mon Nov 16, 2020 4:50 pm Back in February many scientists were saying we were unlikely to see a successful covid vaccine
Today 4 are claiming they work and are safe, and that's without lots of others in development.
Maybe we'll also get a cure for the common cold out of this too.
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
- fishfoodie
- Posts: 8899
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm
Its amazing what can happen when every scientist in the planet, & their Governments & corporations all pull in the same direction.Longshanks wrote: Mon Nov 16, 2020 4:50 pm Back in February many scientists were saying we were unlikely to see a successful covid vaccine
Today 4 are claiming they work and are safe, and that's without lots of others in development.
Maybe we'll also get a cure for the common cold out of this too.
But it shouldn't be a surprise; for decades Ebola was killing thousands in Africa, & very little happened; but once a couple of people started showing up in Europe, & America with it; there was finally a big push to develop a vaccine for it, & one was developed.
Yep. Soon as something threatens the western world, it becomes a lot more serious.fishfoodie wrote: Mon Nov 16, 2020 5:05 pmIts amazing what can happen when every scientist in the planet, & their Governments & corporations all pull in the same direction.Longshanks wrote: Mon Nov 16, 2020 4:50 pm Back in February many scientists were saying we were unlikely to see a successful covid vaccine
Today 4 are claiming they work and are safe, and that's without lots of others in development.
Maybe we'll also get a cure for the common cold out of this too.
But it shouldn't be a surprise; for decades Ebola was killing thousands in Africa, & very little happened; but once a couple of people started showing up in Europe, & America with it; there was finally a big push to develop a vaccine for it, & one was developed.
Give a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.
-
- Posts: 1731
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:49 pm
Raggs wrote: Mon Nov 16, 2020 5:07 pmYep. Soon as something threatens the western world, it becomes a lot more serious.fishfoodie wrote: Mon Nov 16, 2020 5:05 pmIts amazing what can happen when every scientist in the planet, & their Governments & corporations all pull in the same direction.Longshanks wrote: Mon Nov 16, 2020 4:50 pm Back in February many scientists were saying we were unlikely to see a successful covid vaccine
Today 4 are claiming they work and are safe, and that's without lots of others in development.
Maybe we'll also get a cure for the common cold out of this too.
But it shouldn't be a surprise; for decades Ebola was killing thousands in Africa, & very little happened; but once a couple of people started showing up in Europe, & America with it; there was finally a big push to develop a vaccine for it, & one was developed.
And affordable.
-
- Posts: 2450
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 4:04 pm
I didn't take it as being anti-vaxx. And therapeutic use is limited, but the tech isn't new, it's decades in development and there's now an awful lot understood around how it works including in this instance how it can be stored. They're not pinning a variety of answers on the wall and throwing darts whilst blindfolded to pick an option.fishfoodie wrote: Mon Nov 16, 2020 3:06 pmYou're hardly surprised that the douche nozzle is going full anti-vaxxer now, are you ?Rhubarb & Custard wrote: Mon Nov 16, 2020 2:31 pmBimbowomxn wrote: Mon Nov 16, 2020 2:25 pm
Sorry, I’ll be clear for the hard of thinking these would be the first RNA vaccines in human use with all previous efforts failing. The tech used is new.
You'd do better being quiet than trying to be clear, as clearly you've no idea what you're talking about. There's sort of some semblance of a point in there, but it's not useful or accurate commentary you're making.
- Insane_Homer
- Posts: 5541
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:14 pm
- Location: Leafy Surrey
213 new deaths
21,363 new cases
last Monday, there were 194 deaths (+19) and 21,350 cases (+13)
21,363 new cases
last Monday, there were 194 deaths (+19) and 21,350 cases (+13)
“Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true.”
- Longshanks
- Posts: 573
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 6:52 pm
Hopefully we are starting to turn a cornerInsane_Homer wrote: Mon Nov 16, 2020 6:38 pm 213 new deaths
21,363 new cases
last Monday, there were 194 deaths (+19) and 21,350 cases (+13)
They'll be a lot of deaths tomorrow though
Nah. That'd need vaccines for around 200 different viruses - that's why we don't have one, the common cold isn't one disease, it's a couple of hundred. And there's no financial return on developing a vaccine for a couple of percent of cases of the common cold.Longshanks wrote: Mon Nov 16, 2020 4:50 pm Back in February many scientists were saying we were unlikely to see a successful covid vaccine
Today 4 are claiming they work and are safe, and that's without lots of others in development.
Maybe we'll also get a cure for the common cold out of this too.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
- Longshanks
- Posts: 573
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 6:52 pm
Some of the therapeutics being developed i was referring to for the common coldBiffer wrote: Mon Nov 16, 2020 7:50 pmNah. That'd need vaccines for around 200 different viruses - that's why we don't have one, the common cold isn't one disease, it's a couple of hundred. And there's no financial return on developing a vaccine for a couple of percent of cases of the common cold.Longshanks wrote: Mon Nov 16, 2020 4:50 pm Back in February many scientists were saying we were unlikely to see a successful covid vaccine
Today 4 are claiming they work and are safe, and that's without lots of others in development.
Maybe we'll also get a cure for the common cold out of this too.
I realise I didn't make that clear
Couple of cases? Common cold kills millions every week! It’s just like Covid19.Biffer wrote: Mon Nov 16, 2020 7:50 pmNah. That'd need vaccines for around 200 different viruses - that's why we don't have one, the common cold isn't one disease, it's a couple of hundred. And there's no financial return on developing a vaccine for a couple of percent of cases of the common cold.Longshanks wrote: Mon Nov 16, 2020 4:50 pm Back in February many scientists were saying we were unlikely to see a successful covid vaccine
Today 4 are claiming they work and are safe, and that's without lots of others in development.
Maybe we'll also get a cure for the common cold out of this too.
Bloody hell! Fantastic! Matched my answers exactly!
All wrong..
My ability to remember 70s lyrics far outweighs my ability to remember what the fuck I walked into the kitchen for..