President Trump and US politics catchall
-
- Posts: 2347
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 4:04 pm
Diaper Don should have a word with the chap who appointed that judge, Donnie has been cruelly undermined
- fishfoodie
- Posts: 8727
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm
It's all part of Baldrick ... I mean Rudy's cunning plan !Rhubarb & Custard wrote: Sat Nov 28, 2020 11:34 pmDiaper Don should have a word with the chap who appointed that judge, Donnie has been cruelly undermined
He wants to fail upward; to get his date before SCOTUS.
I'd say there's a few Conservative Justices who'll need Diapers themselves if that date arrives; they'll have to make the biggest choice of their careers; & live with the consequences
-
- Posts: 2347
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 4:04 pm
Will SCOTUS even hear his case? I know he's the President but surely they have actual work to be getting on with? Most courts are badly backed up, but if they do choose to find the time to listen to Rudy I've not much sympathy for any claims about a backlog
I think there us a reasonable chance that they may choose to hear it - but at this stage it would purely be so that they can destroy Rudy and make it clear that this sort of BS won't be tolerated in futureRhubarb & Custard wrote: Sun Nov 29, 2020 1:19 am Will SCOTUS even hear his case? I know he's the President but surely they have actual work to be getting on with? Most courts are badly backed up, but if they do choose to find the time to listen to Rudy I've not much sympathy for any claims about a backlog
-
- Posts: 2347
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 4:04 pm
They'll get that chance when someone asks them if Donnie can pardon himselfSaint wrote: Sun Nov 29, 2020 1:25 amI think there us a reasonable chance that they may choose to hear it - but at this stage it would purely be so that they can destroy Rudy and make it clear that this sort of BS won't be tolerated in futureRhubarb & Custard wrote: Sun Nov 29, 2020 1:19 am Will SCOTUS even hear his case? I know he's the President but surely they have actual work to be getting on with? Most courts are badly backed up, but if they do choose to find the time to listen to Rudy I've not much sympathy for any claims about a backlog
What consequences? They have a lifetime position on the supreme court and three of the conservative judges owe nothing to Trump. The longer standing ones will judge according to law for sure. Rudy will be destroyed.fishfoodie wrote: Sat Nov 28, 2020 11:40 pmIt's all part of Baldrick ... I mean Rudy's cunning plan !Rhubarb & Custard wrote: Sat Nov 28, 2020 11:34 pmDiaper Don should have a word with the chap who appointed that judge, Donnie has been cruelly undermined
He wants to fail upward; to get his date before SCOTUS.
I'd say there's a few Conservative Justices who'll need Diapers themselves if that date arrives; they'll have to make the biggest choice of their careers; & live with the consequences
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
- fishfoodie
- Posts: 8727
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm
the consequence that if they act in a blatantly political way; then the legislator gets to take actions to depoliticize the court. That might mean seeking to impeach a Justice, or imposing term limits, (which they should anyway), or packing the court.Biffer wrote: Sun Nov 29, 2020 8:37 amWhat consequences? They have a lifetime position on the supreme court and three of the conservative judges owe nothing to Trump. The longer standing ones will judge according to law for sure. Rudy will be destroyed.fishfoodie wrote: Sat Nov 28, 2020 11:40 pmIt's all part of Baldrick ... I mean Rudy's cunning plan !Rhubarb & Custard wrote: Sat Nov 28, 2020 11:34 pm
Diaper Don should have a word with the chap who appointed that judge, Donnie has been cruelly undermined
He wants to fail upward; to get his date before SCOTUS.
I'd say there's a few Conservative Justices who'll need Diapers themselves if that date arrives; they'll have to make the biggest choice of their careers; & live with the consequences
I tend to agree the conservatives won't want to have to vote against Trump; hence the diapers
I think the SCOTUS will see other potential consequences, for the country, if they are seen to undermine an election that saw Biden win by over 6M votes and 70+ electoral votes. It would basically make elections/democracy impossible and run the risk of mass civil disobedience.fishfoodie wrote: Sun Nov 29, 2020 11:45 amthe consequence that if they act in a blatantly political way; then the legislator gets to take actions to depoliticize the court. That might mean seeking to impeach a Justice, or imposing term limits, (which they should anyway), or packing the court.Biffer wrote: Sun Nov 29, 2020 8:37 amWhat consequences? They have a lifetime position on the supreme court and three of the conservative judges owe nothing to Trump. The longer standing ones will judge according to law for sure. Rudy will be destroyed.fishfoodie wrote: Sat Nov 28, 2020 11:40 pm
It's all part of Baldrick ... I mean Rudy's cunning plan !
He wants to fail upward; to get his date before SCOTUS.
I'd say there's a few Conservative Justices who'll need Diapers themselves if that date arrives; they'll have to make the biggest choice of their careers; & live with the consequences
I tend to agree the conservatives won't want to have to vote against Trump; hence the diapers
- fishfoodie
- Posts: 8727
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm
I think Biden needs to toughen up & be judicious where he reaches out to the GOP; & for a starter, if Diaper Don isn't going to concede graciously; then the cunt shouldn't be invited to the inauguration.
There's no requirement for him to be there, & if he's just going to be a cunt; the best thing is to deny him the platform.
There's no requirement for him to be there, & if he's just going to be a cunt; the best thing is to deny him the platform.
I can't believe that this is mainstream television in Australia.
From the logo on the top left, this is Sky News, which should be semi-respectable and trusted.
I presume that Uncle Rupe is still batting for Trump even after Fox has mustered a strategic withdrawal.
- fishfoodie
- Posts: 8727
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm
Even the Lincoln Project; that played an important part in being the, "Good Republicans"; is now in a place where they need to appeal to the orange scrote, to just stop damaging the GOP
It should be written in human excrement on his gravestone.
I don't know how many times over the last 4+ years; those exact words have gone thru my mind when the thick fuck opened his mouth.For the love of God; Shut the Fuck Up !
It should be written in human excrement on his gravestone.
fishfoodie wrote: Tue Dec 01, 2020 9:48 pm Even the Lincoln Project; that played an important part in being the, "Good Republicans"; is now in a place where they need to appeal to the orange scrote, to just stop damaging the GOP
I don't know how many times over the last 4+ years; those exact words have gone thru my mind when the thick fuck opened his mouth.For the love of God; Shut the Fuck Up !
It should be written in human excrement on his gravestone.

- Guy Smiley
- Posts: 6635
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:52 pm
- fishfoodie
- Posts: 8727
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm
"America's Mayor", admits he's done horrific, illegal shit, & if he doesn't get a pardon, he's facing hard time .... imagine that ....
So if he's needs a pardon; he's admitting that all the Ukraine/Russian interference allegations were absolutely spot on !
There is no other interpretation for him needing a pardon; because if he did nothing wrong; what would he need a pardon for ?
2nd Lowest form of dogshit.
And with blubber Barr about to be given the boot for ~lying~ (telling the truth) about the lack of fraud, he’d better get his pleading in soonfishfoodie wrote: Tue Dec 01, 2020 10:41 pm"America's Mayor", admits he's done horrific, illegal shit, & if he doesn't get a pardon, he's facing hard time .... imagine that ....
So if he's needs a pardon; he's admitting that all the Ukraine/Russian interference allegations were absolutely spot on !
There is no other interpretation for him needing a pardon; because if he did nothing wrong; what would he need a pardon for ?
2nd Lowest form of dogshit.
- fishfoodie
- Posts: 8727
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm
Now here's a question for the legal eagles !
If the gimp Rudy, takes a Federal Pardon; & admits his guilt; what happens if the next Administration gets serious, & subpoenas him to give evidence about foreign collusion to get the Orange scum elected ?
He can't stand mute, or he gets done for contempt.
He can't plead the 5th; as he already has a pardon; so he can be found in contempt, if he doesn't answer questions.
He can't deny knowledge; of complicity; as he's already admitted these, by accepting the pardon.
Either he tells what he knows; or his pardon is useless, as you can't pardon someone for crimes they commit in the future; & if he tells what he knows; he drops the Orange cunt in the shit; & admits that he colluded with the Russians to get the cunt elected.
If the gimp Rudy, takes a Federal Pardon; & admits his guilt; what happens if the next Administration gets serious, & subpoenas him to give evidence about foreign collusion to get the Orange scum elected ?
He can't stand mute, or he gets done for contempt.
He can't plead the 5th; as he already has a pardon; so he can be found in contempt, if he doesn't answer questions.
He can't deny knowledge; of complicity; as he's already admitted these, by accepting the pardon.
Either he tells what he knows; or his pardon is useless, as you can't pardon someone for crimes they commit in the future; & if he tells what he knows; he drops the Orange cunt in the shit; & admits that he colluded with the Russians to get the cunt elected.
I’ve read somewhere, possibly on the bored, that a pardon does not necessarily equate to a guilty plea although I found the reasoning dubious at best.fishfoodie wrote: Wed Dec 02, 2020 12:10 am Now here's a question for the legal eagles !
If the gimp Rudy, takes a Federal Pardon; & admits his guilt; what happens if the next Administration gets serious, & subpoenas him to give evidence about foreign collusion to get the Orange scum elected ?
He can't stand mute, or he gets done for contempt.
He can't plead the 5th; as he already has a pardon; so he can be found in contempt, if he doesn't answer questions.
He can't deny knowledge; of complicity; as he's already admitted these, by accepting the pardon.
Either he tells what he knows; or his pardon is useless, as you can't pardon someone for crimes they commit in the future; & if he tells what he knows; he drops the Orange cunt in the shit; & admits that he colluded with the Russians to get the cunt elected.
- fishfoodie
- Posts: 8727
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm
Hong Kong wrote: Wed Dec 02, 2020 2:36 amI’ve read somewhere, possibly on the bored, that a pardon does not necessarily equate to a guilty plea although I found the reasoning dubious at best.fishfoodie wrote: Wed Dec 02, 2020 12:10 am Now here's a question for the legal eagles !
If the gimp Rudy, takes a Federal Pardon; & admits his guilt; what happens if the next Administration gets serious, & subpoenas him to give evidence about foreign collusion to get the Orange scum elected ?
He can't stand mute, or he gets done for contempt.
He can't plead the 5th; as he already has a pardon; so he can be found in contempt, if he doesn't answer questions.
He can't deny knowledge; of complicity; as he's already admitted these, by accepting the pardon.
Either he tells what he knows; or his pardon is useless, as you can't pardon someone for crimes they commit in the future; & if he tells what he knows; he drops the Orange cunt in the shit; & admits that he colluded with the Russians to get the cunt elected.
The DoJs guidelines don't leave much room for doubt.
A pardon is an expression of the President’s forgiveness and ordinarily is granted in recognition of the applicant’s acceptance of responsibility for the crime and established good conduct for a significant period of time after conviction or completion of sentence. It does not signify innocence. It does, however, remove civil disabilities – e.g., restrictions on the right to vote, hold state or local office, or sit on a jury – imposed because of the conviction for which pardon is sought, and should lessen the stigma arising from the conviction. It may also be helpful in obtaining licenses, bonding, or employment. Under some – but not all – circumstances, a pardon will eliminate the legal basis for removal or deportation from the United States.
There's lots of legal theories doing the rounds that specifically invalidate previous understanding. Some in the GOP are pushing the idea that a presidential pardon DOES actually cover state level crimes. There's an implication that the pardon implies guilt, but that seems to be based on Gerald Ford's comments on the Nixon pardon and a mis-reading of Burdick vs United States. It's by no means settled lawHong Kong wrote: Wed Dec 02, 2020 2:36 amI’ve read somewhere, possibly on the bored, that a pardon does not necessarily equate to a guilty plea although I found the reasoning dubious at best.fishfoodie wrote: Wed Dec 02, 2020 12:10 am Now here's a question for the legal eagles !
If the gimp Rudy, takes a Federal Pardon; & admits his guilt; what happens if the next Administration gets serious, & subpoenas him to give evidence about foreign collusion to get the Orange scum elected ?
He can't stand mute, or he gets done for contempt.
He can't plead the 5th; as he already has a pardon; so he can be found in contempt, if he doesn't answer questions.
He can't deny knowledge; of complicity; as he's already admitted these, by accepting the pardon.
Either he tells what he knows; or his pardon is useless, as you can't pardon someone for crimes they commit in the future; & if he tells what he knows; he drops the Orange cunt in the shit; & admits that he colluded with the Russians to get the cunt elected.
Ordinarily doesn't mean in every case. Being pardoned for things you've not yet been convicted of, or even investigated for cannot be an admission of guilt in that sense; you weren't found guilty in the first place! There was a really good episode of All The President's Lawyers where they talked about this, but basically: the presidential pardon power is ridiculously broad and no it does not mean admission of guilt.fishfoodie wrote: Wed Dec 02, 2020 9:29 amHong Kong wrote: Wed Dec 02, 2020 2:36 amI’ve read somewhere, possibly on the bored, that a pardon does not necessarily equate to a guilty plea although I found the reasoning dubious at best.fishfoodie wrote: Wed Dec 02, 2020 12:10 am Now here's a question for the legal eagles !
If the gimp Rudy, takes a Federal Pardon; & admits his guilt; what happens if the next Administration gets serious, & subpoenas him to give evidence about foreign collusion to get the Orange scum elected ?
He can't stand mute, or he gets done for contempt.
He can't plead the 5th; as he already has a pardon; so he can be found in contempt, if he doesn't answer questions.
He can't deny knowledge; of complicity; as he's already admitted these, by accepting the pardon.
Either he tells what he knows; or his pardon is useless, as you can't pardon someone for crimes they commit in the future; & if he tells what he knows; he drops the Orange cunt in the shit; & admits that he colluded with the Russians to get the cunt elected.
The DoJs guidelines don't leave much room for doubt.
A pardon is an expression of the President’s forgiveness and ordinarily is granted in recognition of the applicant’s acceptance of responsibility for the crime and established good conduct for a significant period of time after conviction or completion of sentence. It does not signify innocence. It does, however, remove civil disabilities – e.g., restrictions on the right to vote, hold state or local office, or sit on a jury – imposed because of the conviction for which pardon is sought, and should lessen the stigma arising from the conviction. It may also be helpful in obtaining licenses, bonding, or employment. Under some – but not all – circumstances, a pardon will eliminate the legal basis for removal or deportation from the United States.
He was in particularly deranged dangerous nut job mode yesterday.
Particularly liked him retweeting the video of the Republican guy in Georgia pleading with him to call off the hounds threatening death and rape to officals, and pouring more oil on the fire.
Particularly liked him retweeting the video of the Republican guy in Georgia pleading with him to call off the hounds threatening death and rape to officals, and pouring more oil on the fire.
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
-
- Posts: 2347
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 4:04 pm
Over payments to be made as part of a bribery scheme? Good luck with convincing a court privilege is anywhere near the same Zip code
- fishfoodie
- Posts: 8727
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm
I can't wait for the day twitter cuts off his account.Slick wrote: Wed Dec 02, 2020 10:27 am He was in particularly deranged dangerous nut job mode yesterday.
Particularly liked him retweeting the video of the Republican guy in Georgia pleading with him to call off the hounds threatening death and rape to officals, and pouring more oil on the fire.
It'll be like making a junkie go cold turkey.