
https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/colorado- ... -1.5921973
https://abcnews.go.com/US/plane-debris- ... d=76020616


But on the downside; in the event of a disc burst; the cowling, HAS TO CONTAIN THE SHRAPNEL !Biffer wrote: Sun Feb 21, 2021 10:17 am On the bright side, it shows that these planes can land safely despite a catastrophic engine failure.
The 26-year-old 777 was powered by two Pratt & Whitney PW4000 engines. Investigators will focus on what caused the accident and will look at whether a fan blade failed.
Obviously. I'm not saying it's all fine don't worry about it!fishfoodie wrote: Sun Feb 21, 2021 12:34 pmBut on the downside; in the event of a disc burst; the cowling, HAS TO CONTAIN THE SHRAPNEL !Biffer wrote: Sun Feb 21, 2021 10:17 am On the bright side, it shows that these planes can land safely despite a catastrophic engine failure.
If it doesn't; there's a good chance the wing, & fuel tanks can be ruptured.
In this case the engine manufacturer, & not Boeing, has some serious questions to answer.
26 year old plane, parked for a year, maintenance rushed to get it flying again, etcfishfoodie wrote: Sun Feb 21, 2021 12:34 pmBut on the downside; in the event of a disc burst; the cowling, HAS TO CONTAIN THE SHRAPNEL !Biffer wrote: Sun Feb 21, 2021 10:17 am On the bright side, it shows that these planes can land safely despite a catastrophic engine failure.
If it doesn't; there's a good chance the wing, & fuel tanks can be ruptured.
In this case the engine manufacturer, & not Boeing, has some serious questions to answer.
The 26-year-old 777 was powered by two Pratt & Whitney PW4000 engines. Investigators will focus on what caused the accident and will look at whether a fan blade failed.
... and a mechanic who can't find his 3/4" socket .....Sandstorm wrote: Sun Feb 21, 2021 1:57 pm26 year old plane, parked for a year, maintenance rushed to get it flying again, etcfishfoodie wrote: Sun Feb 21, 2021 12:34 pmBut on the downside; in the event of a disc burst; the cowling, HAS TO CONTAIN THE SHRAPNEL !Biffer wrote: Sun Feb 21, 2021 10:17 am On the bright side, it shows that these planes can land safely despite a catastrophic engine failure.
If it doesn't; there's a good chance the wing, & fuel tanks can be ruptured.
In this case the engine manufacturer, & not Boeing, has some serious questions to answer.
The 26-year-old 777 was powered by two Pratt & Whitney PW4000 engines. Investigators will focus on what caused the accident and will look at whether a fan blade failed.
If it moves and it shouldn’t = duct tapefishfoodie wrote: Sun Feb 21, 2021 2:24 pm... and a mechanic who can't find his 3/4" socket .....Sandstorm wrote: Sun Feb 21, 2021 1:57 pm26 year old plane, parked for a year, maintenance rushed to get it flying again, etcfishfoodie wrote: Sun Feb 21, 2021 12:34 pm
But on the downside; in the event of a disc burst; the cowling, HAS TO CONTAIN THE SHRAPNEL !
If it doesn't; there's a good chance the wing, & fuel tanks can be ruptured.
In this case the engine manufacturer, & not Boeing, has some serious questions to answer.
A Boeing 747-400BCF freighter registered VQ-BWT (MSN 24975) flying for Bermuda-based Longtail Aviation took off from runway 21 at Maastricht Aachen Airport this Saturday afternoon at 16:11 (UTC+1). The aeroplane operating flight LGT5504 to New York JFK experienced heavy damage on an engine shortly after take-off. Engine parts (turbine blades) fell in the nearby village of Meerssen resulting in 2 people slightly injured and damage to cars.
According to a spokesman for the South Limburg Safety Region, an explosion has probably occurred in engine number one of the aircraft. Metal parts such as turbine blades have come down around the Limburg town of Meerssen.
Debris hit an elderly woman, who was slightly injured as a result. A child also burned his fingers on a piece of metal.
In Meerssen several houses and cars got damaged by falling debris.
The thirty-year-old plane immediately diverted on three engines to Liège airport, where it landed safely after making a number of laps over the Ardennes to burn fuel and lose weight.
Presumably to disguise the brown trousers?
Un Pilier wrote: Sun Feb 21, 2021 5:50 pmIf it moves and it shouldn’t = duct tapefishfoodie wrote: Sun Feb 21, 2021 2:24 pm... and a mechanic who can't find his 3/4" socket .....Sandstorm wrote: Sun Feb 21, 2021 1:57 pm
26 year old plane, parked for a year, maintenance rushed to get it flying again, etc
If it doesn’t move and it should = WD40![]()
This is something I'm genuinely concerned about wrt sir travel. Planes are designed to fly constantly, not sit on the ground.Sandstorm wrote: Sun Feb 21, 2021 1:57 pm26 year old plane, parked for a year, maintenance rushed to get it flying again, etcfishfoodie wrote: Sun Feb 21, 2021 12:34 pmBut on the downside; in the event of a disc burst; the cowling, HAS TO CONTAIN THE SHRAPNEL !Biffer wrote: Sun Feb 21, 2021 10:17 am On the bright side, it shows that these planes can land safely despite a catastrophic engine failure.
If it doesn't; there's a good chance the wing, & fuel tanks can be ruptured.
In this case the engine manufacturer, & not Boeing, has some serious questions to answer.
The 26-year-old 777 was powered by two Pratt & Whitney PW4000 engines. Investigators will focus on what caused the accident and will look at whether a fan blade failed.
Other than a brief hiatus this one has been flying pretty much every day through the pandemicBiffer wrote: Mon Feb 22, 2021 7:39 amThis is something I'm genuinely concerned about wrt sir travel. Planes are designed to fly constantly, not sit on the ground.Sandstorm wrote: Sun Feb 21, 2021 1:57 pm26 year old plane, parked for a year, maintenance rushed to get it flying again, etcfishfoodie wrote: Sun Feb 21, 2021 12:34 pm
But on the downside; in the event of a disc burst; the cowling, HAS TO CONTAIN THE SHRAPNEL !
If it doesn't; there's a good chance the wing, & fuel tanks can be ruptured.
In this case the engine manufacturer, & not Boeing, has some serious questions to answer.
It’s buried in the bonnet of an F350 pickup truck 57 miles from the airport.fishfoodie wrote: Sun Feb 21, 2021 2:24 pm... and a mechanic who can't find his 3/4" socket .....Sandstorm wrote: Sun Feb 21, 2021 1:57 pm26 year old plane, parked for a year, maintenance rushed to get it flying again, etcfishfoodie wrote: Sun Feb 21, 2021 12:34 pm
But on the downside; in the event of a disc burst; the cowling, HAS TO CONTAIN THE SHRAPNEL !
If it doesn't; there's a good chance the wing, & fuel tanks can be ruptured.
In this case the engine manufacturer, & not Boeing, has some serious questions to answer.
tabascoboy wrote: Sun Feb 21, 2021 10:19 am "Looks like I picked the wrong week to quit scrap metal recycling"
That's correct. To avoid user error. it's fine in theory but useless mostly in practice becausetc27 wrote: Mon Feb 22, 2021 12:01 pm Sounds like its more a P&W problem than a Boeing one.
Interestingly today just found out that ETOPs regulations require different technicians to service each engine on twin engine aircraft (for obvious reasons).
I don;t think it applies to ANY government owned aircraft, military or otherwise
That’ll be a hell of a claim form to fill in.fishfoodie wrote: Mon Feb 22, 2021 6:53 pm Yikes !![]()
a chunk of titanium moving at terminal velocity; I'm surprised it didn't go straight thru the roof
They're used to odd claims in the Netherlands. A mate managed to accidentally chuck a snowball through a window that was only open about 6 inches straight into the PC monitor of the householder who was working inside.GogLais wrote: Mon Feb 22, 2021 7:55 pmThat’ll be a hell of a claim form to fill in.fishfoodie wrote: Mon Feb 22, 2021 6:53 pm Yikes !![]()
a chunk of titanium moving at terminal velocity; I'm surprised it didn't go straight thru the roof