Can I have your porn collection and bagpipes?
So, coronavirus...
Thanks, and Biffer. Getting a bit of pressure from my mum, who lives in England, to head down on the 26th April when we can move again. She will be fully vaccinated and says we can form a bubble
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
Bubble rules are different and provided you qualify you've been able to stay overnight through the whole lockdown
Yes, but with the travel restrictions it made it difficult to justify. My mum is currently in a bubble with my sister who lives locally but is intending to break that bubble before we go down and form it with us. All within rules as I read them, as long is there is sufficient time between bubbles. To be honest it's really difficult to say no now that she will be fully vaccinated even though we want to stick to the rules - I know it's not 100% protection.Saint wrote: ↑Wed Mar 17, 2021 8:24 amBubble rules are different and provided you qualify you've been able to stay overnight through the whole lockdown
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
Yeah, well in that case you're going to be legal. You need 2 weeks between one bubble ending and another starting, so as soon as you're allowed to cross the border then it's allowedSlick wrote: ↑Wed Mar 17, 2021 8:58 amYes, but with the travel restrictions it made it difficult to justify. My mum is currently in a bubble with my sister who lives locally but is intending to break that bubble before we go down and form it with us. All within rules as I read them, as long is there is sufficient time between bubbles. To be honest it's really difficult to say no now that she will be fully vaccinated even though we want to stick to the rules - I know it's not 100% protection.
-
- Posts: 1148
- Joined: Sat Jul 04, 2020 9:31 am
Had the vaccine yesterday.
Woke with back pain, neck pain, jaw pain, finger aches and a high temperature.
But hey, had the vaccine, super happy.
Woke with back pain, neck pain, jaw pain, finger aches and a high temperature.
But hey, had the vaccine, super happy.
Which one did you have?Line6 HXFX wrote: ↑Wed Mar 17, 2021 9:22 am Had the vaccine yesterday.
Woke with back pain, neck pain, jaw pain, finger aches and a high temperature.
But hey, had the vaccine, super happy.
You've always been wokeLine6 HXFX wrote: ↑Wed Mar 17, 2021 9:22 am Had the vaccine yesterday.
Woke with back pain, neck pain, jaw pain, finger aches and a high temperature.
But hey, had the vaccine, super happy.
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
They take a while, but finally got round to updating the front pageSandstorm wrote: ↑Tue Mar 16, 2021 11:30 am NHS now accepting requests for all over 50s. Login and pick your dates + location for 1st and 2nd jab today. No need to wait for your letter.
https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/coronavir ... ccination/
My wife booked her first jab for next Friday, then mid June.
First of all, I was being facetious. As I took you to be.Sandstorm wrote: ↑Tue Mar 16, 2021 8:38 pmDon’t be silly. Every country starts slowly and then ramps up the rollout.Rinkals wrote: ↑Tue Mar 16, 2021 7:59 pmI saw a figure (which I can't find: sorry), which suggested that, at the rate South Africans are currently getting the jab, it will be another twenty years before 60% of the population is inoculated.
So, I don't think you have to worry on that score: we should have bred enough resistant variants in that time to keep your hospitals busy in perpetuity.
And secondly, I believe we are having difficulty securing supply of the vaccination.
Underlying my facetious remark was a serious point, namely that Nations that secure their own populations at the expense of poorer nations risk reinfection through the virus being allowed to thrive outside of their orbit.
As mor vaccines are approved and more production comes on line, and more programmes are completed, more becomes available for allRinkals wrote: ↑Wed Mar 17, 2021 10:44 amFirst of all, I was being facetious. As I took you to be.Sandstorm wrote: ↑Tue Mar 16, 2021 8:38 pmDon’t be silly. Every country starts slowly and then ramps up the rollout.Rinkals wrote: ↑Tue Mar 16, 2021 7:59 pm
I saw a figure (which I can't find: sorry), which suggested that, at the rate South Africans are currently getting the jab, it will be another twenty years before 60% of the population is inoculated.
So, I don't think you have to worry on that score: we should have bred enough resistant variants in that time to keep your hospitals busy in perpetuity.
And secondly, I believe we are having difficulty securing supply of the vaccination.
Underlying my facetious remark was a serious point, namely that Nations that secure their own populations at the expense of poorer nations risk reinfection through the virus being allowed to thrive outside of their orbit.
That's only a serious complaint once nations start to sit on stockpiles of vaccine, whilst others go without. As of now, no country has finished it's own vaccine program, and they mostly seem to be stabbing about as fast as they're getting (or close enough that the leftover is relative pocket change on a global scale). And it is in a country's benefit to vaccinate it's own population before others. A single jab can only vaccinate one person, whether it's in a rich or poor country.Rinkals wrote: ↑Wed Mar 17, 2021 10:44 amFirst of all, I was being facetious. As I took you to be.Sandstorm wrote: ↑Tue Mar 16, 2021 8:38 pmDon’t be silly. Every country starts slowly and then ramps up the rollout.Rinkals wrote: ↑Tue Mar 16, 2021 7:59 pm
I saw a figure (which I can't find: sorry), which suggested that, at the rate South Africans are currently getting the jab, it will be another twenty years before 60% of the population is inoculated.
So, I don't think you have to worry on that score: we should have bred enough resistant variants in that time to keep your hospitals busy in perpetuity.
And secondly, I believe we are having difficulty securing supply of the vaccination.
Underlying my facetious remark was a serious point, namely that Nations that secure their own populations at the expense of poorer nations risk reinfection through the virus being allowed to thrive outside of their orbit.
Give a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.
Downtrodden onesturginho wrote: ↑Wed Mar 17, 2021 9:27 amWhich one did you have?Line6 HXFX wrote: ↑Wed Mar 17, 2021 9:22 am Had the vaccine yesterday.
Woke with back pain, neck pain, jaw pain, finger aches and a high temperature.
But hey, had the vaccine, super happy.
There is currently a discussion on whether there might be a moratorium on IP restrictions on these vaccines to allow their production in India. South Africa, too, has a competent medical industry capable of producing medicines and vaccines, despite disparaging remarks made earlier on this thread.Saint wrote: ↑Wed Mar 17, 2021 10:47 amAs mor vaccines are approved and more production comes on line, and more programmes are completed, more becomes available for allRinkals wrote: ↑Wed Mar 17, 2021 10:44 amFirst of all, I was being facetious. As I took you to be.
And secondly, I believe we are having difficulty securing supply of the vaccination.
Underlying my facetious remark was a serious point, namely that Nations that secure their own populations at the expense of poorer nations risk reinfection through the virus being allowed to thrive outside of their orbit.
However, without getting too Q-Anon, it is obviously in the drug companies' interests to prevent that from happening. Not only is there a strong imperative to defend their IP, but it obviously hurts the bottom line if treatment works too well. Sorry to sound a little conspiratorial, but these companies do not exist as entirely philanthropic entities.
That is probably neither here nor there, but the end result is probably going to be against opening up the IP.
But, to make my point again, if the virus is allowed to thrive in poorer countries, then it will probably resurface in wealthier nations in divers variants.
It's far from clear how much capacity there actually is, particularly if we intend to keep up manufacturing cpacity for all those other pesky viruses like Smallpox. Additionally, few few of these vaccines are actually manufactured in a single facility - the supply chains are complex with many limiting factors. For instance even if you could spin up a final production facility for Pfizer in SA, there's a core component to it that is currently only manufactured in 2 factories in the world, and I've seen estimates that it could take between 6 and 18 months to bring any other facility on line.Rinkals wrote: ↑Wed Mar 17, 2021 11:58 amThere is currently a discussion on whether there might be a moratorium on IP restrictions on these vaccines to allow their production in India. South Africa, too, has a competent medical industry capable of producing medicines and vaccines, despite disparaging remarks made earlier on this thread.Saint wrote: ↑Wed Mar 17, 2021 10:47 amAs mor vaccines are approved and more production comes on line, and more programmes are completed, more becomes available for allRinkals wrote: ↑Wed Mar 17, 2021 10:44 am
First of all, I was being facetious. As I took you to be.
And secondly, I believe we are having difficulty securing supply of the vaccination.
Underlying my facetious remark was a serious point, namely that Nations that secure their own populations at the expense of poorer nations risk reinfection through the virus being allowed to thrive outside of their orbit.
However, without getting too Q-Anon, it is obviously in the drug companies' interests to prevent that from happening. Not only is there a strong imperative to defend their IP, but it obviously hurts the bottom line if treatment works too well. Sorry to sound a little conspiratorial, but these companies do not exist as entirely philanthropic entities.
That is probably neither here nor there, but the end result is probably going to be against opening up the IP.
But, to make my point again, if the virus is allowed to thrive in poorer countries, then it will probably resurface in wealthier nations in divers variants.
As much as anything, this is why it's important to have many vaccines of different types so as to best utilise what manufacturing capacity we have
The defence force out on TV today:
Ah yes, no-one could possibly have known the virus was deadly or that Boris was being irresponsible, it is only with the benefit of hindsight and not, you know, HAVING LOOKED AT CHINA AND ITALY AND HAVING A FUCKING HEAD START ON EVERYONE ELSE AND BLINDLY REFUSING TO PAY ATTENTION
Ah yes, no-one could possibly have known the virus was deadly or that Boris was being irresponsible, it is only with the benefit of hindsight and not, you know, HAVING LOOKED AT CHINA AND ITALY AND HAVING A FUCKING HEAD START ON EVERYONE ELSE AND BLINDLY REFUSING TO PAY ATTENTION
All valid points but South Africa would have a stronger argument if they didn't turn away 1.5 million AZ vaccine despite WHO recommendations not to do so. I believe this is the first time the SA government has gone against WHO advice and as I've stated previously, I think it is a terrible case of CYA, principly by the scientists in the Ministerial Advisory Committee on COVID-19, and secondly by the politicians that don't have the balls to overrule their scientific advisors.Rinkals wrote: ↑Wed Mar 17, 2021 11:58 amThere is currently a discussion on whether there might be a moratorium on IP restrictions on these vaccines to allow their production in India. South Africa, too, has a competent medical industry capable of producing medicines and vaccines, despite disparaging remarks made earlier on this thread.Saint wrote: ↑Wed Mar 17, 2021 10:47 amAs mor vaccines are approved and more production comes on line, and more programmes are completed, more becomes available for allRinkals wrote: ↑Wed Mar 17, 2021 10:44 am
First of all, I was being facetious. As I took you to be.
And secondly, I believe we are having difficulty securing supply of the vaccination.
Underlying my facetious remark was a serious point, namely that Nations that secure their own populations at the expense of poorer nations risk reinfection through the virus being allowed to thrive outside of their orbit.
However, without getting too Q-Anon, it is obviously in the drug companies' interests to prevent that from happening. Not only is there a strong imperative to defend their IP, but it obviously hurts the bottom line if treatment works too well. Sorry to sound a little conspiratorial, but these companies do not exist as entirely philanthropic entities.
That is probably neither here nor there, but the end result is probably going to be against opening up the IP.
But, to make my point again, if the virus is allowed to thrive in poorer countries, then it will probably resurface in wealthier nations in divers variants.
- all because of the remote chance that the AZ will prove ineffective against severe disease caused by covsars 2- SA varient, and thus people will have to be vaccinated twice. The SA government was also late in starting to procure vaccines even as it became clear that those vaccines will be effective.
In which case, why the reticence in offering a limited moratorium on the IP involved?Saint wrote: ↑Wed Mar 17, 2021 12:50 pm It's far from clear how much capacity there actually is, particularly if we intend to keep up manufacturing cpacity for all those other pesky viruses like Smallpox. Additionally, few few of these vaccines are actually manufactured in a single facility - the supply chains are complex with many limiting factors. For instance even if you could spin up a final production facility for Pfizer in SA, there's a core component to it that is currently only manufactured in 2 factories in the world, and I've seen estimates that it could take between 6 and 18 months to bring any other facility on line.
As much as anything, this is why it's important to have many vaccines of different types so as to best utilise what manufacturing capacity we have
Because while the USE of the IP can be limited for this specific vaccine, the actual knowledge shared won't be forgotten - which in turn could have serious commercial impact somewhere down the road on a different project. Whilst for a more traditional vaccine that's probably not an issue as everyone more or less knows how to develop and produce them, for the newer platforms there's a huge amount of investment in the general technology and development that the various companies need to protectRinkals wrote: ↑Wed Mar 17, 2021 12:59 pmIn which case, why the reticence in offering a limited moratorium on the IP involved?Saint wrote: ↑Wed Mar 17, 2021 12:50 pm It's far from clear how much capacity there actually is, particularly if we intend to keep up manufacturing cpacity for all those other pesky viruses like Smallpox. Additionally, few few of these vaccines are actually manufactured in a single facility - the supply chains are complex with many limiting factors. For instance even if you could spin up a final production facility for Pfizer in SA, there's a core component to it that is currently only manufactured in 2 factories in the world, and I've seen estimates that it could take between 6 and 18 months to bring any other facility on line.
As much as anything, this is why it's important to have many vaccines of different types so as to best utilise what manufacturing capacity we have
I'm of two minds to this, but actually it's the long term ability of Pharma to make profits that enables their long term ability to develop new vaccines and technologies.
Great. Time for a bit more posturing. It can;t really go anywhere as a core Pfizer component is manufactured in the UK, and no-one really wants this to get that ugly
I'm curious as to what Ursula means about recieving exports from the USA though, when the USA has a blanket ban on any exports of any Covid vaccine, whether it's certified for use in the USA or not (see 70million odd doses of AZ sitting in warehouses)
I'm curious as to what Ursula means about recieving exports from the USA though, when the USA has a blanket ban on any exports of any Covid vaccine, whether it's certified for use in the USA or not (see 70million odd doses of AZ sitting in warehouses)
I think she means that there is reciprocity with the US because no EU manufactured vaccines have gone to the US; hence the US ban doesn’t affect the EU (despite there being a surfeit of unused AZ vaccines in the US).Saint wrote: ↑Wed Mar 17, 2021 1:51 pm Great. Time for a bit more posturing. It can;t really go anywhere as a core Pfizer component is manufactured in the UK, and no-one really wants this to get that ugly
I'm curious as to what Ursula means about recieving exports from the USA though, when the USA has a blanket ban on any exports of any Covid vaccine, whether it's certified for use in the USA or not (see 70million odd doses of AZ sitting in warehouses)
As the UK has received 9m Pfizer vaccines from EU plants, in line with our contracts, she thinks we should reciprocate and provide the EU with AZ vaccines, despite the lack of any contractual basis for us doing so.
-
- Posts: 1010
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 10:08 pm
Basically, yes. Developing drugs is expensive and time consuming. If at any one time a phama company has one blockbuster drug, that's a massive result. I spent several years selling computers to pharma companies and met a fair few of their R&D people. The timescale for making money off them is limited. I was dealing with Eli Lilly when Prozac went off patent. They decided to see if they could slow the adoption of generics through advertising etc. End result - fastest ever shift to generics
Vaccines tend not to be massively profitable and are designed to eliminate the condition they target - this is why most of the original research has to be publicly funded. One of the interesting things about COVID is to see how quickly you can move when everybody has a vested interest in success.
Last edited by Dinsdale Piranha on Wed Mar 17, 2021 2:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 1010
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 10:08 pm
OK. More posturing, paint the UK as the bad guy, cover for her own mistakes etc. It's just frustrating that so much time and effort is being spent on this type of thing when it could be used far more profitably.Lobby wrote: ↑Wed Mar 17, 2021 2:09 pmI think she means that there is reciprocity with the US because no EU manufactured vaccines have gone to the US; hence the US ban doesn’t affect the EU (despite there being a surfeit of unused AZ vaccines in the US).Saint wrote: ↑Wed Mar 17, 2021 1:51 pm Great. Time for a bit more posturing. It can;t really go anywhere as a core Pfizer component is manufactured in the UK, and no-one really wants this to get that ugly
I'm curious as to what Ursula means about recieving exports from the USA though, when the USA has a blanket ban on any exports of any Covid vaccine, whether it's certified for use in the USA or not (see 70million odd doses of AZ sitting in warehouses)
As the UK has received 9m Pfizer vaccines from EU plants, in line with our contracts, she thinks we should reciprocate and provide the EU with AZ vaccines, despite the lack of any contractual basis for us doing so.
Actually, I do understand their concerns.
But to my mind, it risks allowing the virus to incubate with the possibility of nastier versions down the line.
But it also risks a complete lack of investment and development in future tech to deal with the next big outbreak. There aren't any good answers here at allRinkals wrote: ↑Wed Mar 17, 2021 3:47 pmActually, I do understand their concerns.
But to my mind, it risks allowing the virus to incubate with the possibility of nastier versions down the line.
-
- Posts: 642
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 10:11 am
So on the assumption that they've been reviewing results in real time, and not just waiting on the final results to publish, we've got a week or so before this gets full approval?
Give a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.
They;ve been on a rolling review for some time. I think Novovax still have to submit some manufacturing data to MHRA, but the emergency approval has to be imminent