JM2K6 wrote: ↑Mon Nov 14, 2022 12:07 pm Earl's form is superb and his biggest problem is that he would absolutely tear it up if England were given the chance to play the sort of rugby that he (and Smith, JVP, etc etc) are best at. That isn't going to happen so more leaden-footed bashers are the order of the day. It's a real shame, he's worked hard to improve his game and it absolutely should be rewarded.
Anyway. England: Porter missed his first two tackles and got stripped in contact as his first 3 involvements and I was raging. He then did okay and his 2nd try was good pace. He did nothing to suggest he's better than an honest pro but he was at least a positive this time round.
I will admit I was a) fucking knackered and b) slightly bored and distracted so didn't watch the game too closely at times. It felt like we did a physical number on Japan which is great but we all know that has limited application elsewhere. Despite all the points we scored I feel like ours was the least impressive of the NH performances this weekend.
It just felt like one of the many wins over smaller teams we had from 2004-2015. The physicality was there and some highlights from our more gifted players, but there was no real challenge to us and we never looked like we were playing with serious intensity or cohesion. We could play like that against any of the top 5 teams and get a kicking.
To be honest, Japan were not much more than opposed training for England, they really brought nothing to the game. I would suggest it is a bit too early for people to be wanking over the performance and how they have turned it around until they play a proper team i.e. New Zealand and South Africa