It done fucked me up good

I read your experience and said a little thank you to my GP for choosing Pfizer.
IIRC Moderna is a bigger dose than Pfizer which may be why it kicks some people harder. The mRNA component is identical in both.Kiwias wrote: Tue Feb 01, 2022 4:53 amI read your experience and said a little thank you to my GP for choosing Pfizer.
I have no strong position in regards Spotify. It is what it is, just like Faece-book etc. i.e. massive media companies without ethics....... because that's how they make money. Whilst I dislike/hold contempt for such businesses, I can't affect them and so can't be arsed getting worked up over their existences. Frankly, they only exist because of the co-operation of their users. In the case of Spotify, users also include the very same artists who are making money and then (in some cases) subsequently posturing in regards their own payer's dubious ethics. IIRC, Young removed his works from Spotify and then reinstated them.Guy Smiley wrote: Mon Jan 31, 2022 10:12 pm I'm struggling to understand your position.
On one hand you profess distrust for Young's motivations in giving up (in his own estimation) 60% of his streaming income for a moral stand, the sort of thing he's done all his career.
On the other hand, you seem to have no problem at all with the stance of the company who are prepared to shell out $100 million to host a controversial podcaster whose presented material has been shown to be misleading at best and generally dishonest.
Pardon my cynicsm here but you strike me as just another corporate favouring conservative who hates hippies, as evidenced in your automatic categorising of Young.
100% all of this ^^^^^^Tichtheid wrote: Mon Jan 31, 2022 10:34 pm I have a steaming service (Apple), and I've used Tidal and Spotify in the past, but I use it as "try before you buy" service. You used to be able to go into a record shop and ask the guy (it was always a guy) behind the counter to put on an album and you'd listen to several tracks before deciding if you wanted to buy it or not.
As someone said online earlier, it's not sustainable or ethical to have the entire history of recorded music at your disposal for £10 per month.
This is also why live concert tickets are so expensive now, there is practically no living to be made with the months, sometimes years of work that goes into an album.
Would you work for three grand per million uses of your work as per that stupid Guardian article? What if that material represents months, years of work?
I don't actually believe the return is as much as that, btw.
Buy CDs, vinyl, Bandcamp is best.
Both Young and Mitchell are in their late 70's. I suspect they have enough money to let them live life as they want till they pop off this world. I struggle to see either of them trying to use their Spotify actions as some sort of self serving commercial action or a means to boost their popularity amongst their own audiences, most of whom will probably be older than them and still own the music as LPs! I suspect they are at an age where they don't give a shit about what people think of them, they probably never did, or their own motivations and will do what they think is right and proper based on their moral stances reflecting their own personal life experiences. Good luck to them and I am pleased they took the actions they did, if nothing else it raised the issue and debate to a wider audience.Guy Smiley wrote: Mon Jan 31, 2022 10:12 pmI'm struggling to understand your position.Torquemada 1420 wrote: Mon Jan 31, 2022 9:55 pmYup. I definitely reach for the misanthrope lenses whenever I see a privileged person apparently moral crusading.Guy Smiley wrote: Mon Jan 31, 2022 9:43 pm
FFS Torq...
both of them belong to that generation of musicians who were known for their social activism. It's been almost a mainstay of theirs.
Your cynicsm is just your default setting.
This is a balanced article
https://www.theguardian.com/music/2022/ ... nformation
On one hand you profess distrust for Young's motivations in giving up (in his own estimation) 60% of his streaming income for a moral stand, the sort of thing he's done all his career.
On the other hand, you seem to have no problem at all with the stance of the company who are prepared to shell out $100 million to host a controversial podcaster whose presented material has been shown to be misleading at best and generally dishonest.
Pardon my cynicsm here but you strike me as just another corporate favouring conservative who hates hippies, as evidenced in your automatic categorising of Young.
Torquemada 1420 wrote: Mon Jan 31, 2022 9:34 pmYou may be right. I'm just deeply cynical about musicians when they start making statements which scream "Look at my virtuosity". Something about them as a group that makes them especially notorious for it.dpedin wrote: Mon Jan 31, 2022 9:06 pm However I still suspect that for Mitchell and Young their experiences of contracting polio, a disease now largely disappeared due to vaccination, was a driver for their objections to the anti vaccine messages being on Spotify and as a result they pulled their music. For me it is nothing other than them both doing what they think is right.
Why don't you give us a link then?troglodiet wrote: Wed Feb 02, 2022 7:09 amTorquemada 1420 wrote: Mon Jan 31, 2022 9:34 pmYou may be right. I'm just deeply cynical about musicians when they start making statements which scream "Look at my virtuosity". Something about them as a group that makes them especially notorious for it.dpedin wrote: Mon Jan 31, 2022 9:06 pm However I still suspect that for Mitchell and Young their experiences of contracting polio, a disease now largely disappeared due to vaccination, was a driver for their objections to the anti vaccine messages being on Spotify and as a result they pulled their music. For me it is nothing other than them both doing what they think is right.
Look a bit deeper into Young's recent actions and another picture is emerging.
He sold most of the rights to his music recently to a company with some very dodgy connections - dodgier than anybody saying they got cured from Covid using medically prescribed Ivermectin.
Brilliant but will fly over the heads of the truckers and their mates!Niegs wrote: Wed Feb 02, 2022 5:40 am Not directly related, but maybe you've heard of this convoy of 'truckers' (i.e. smaller percentage of truckers, larger percentage of anti-vaxxers/anti-mandates types in their various non-big rig vehicles, a few have displayed swastikas and white supremacist attitudes) in Canada protesting around the country?
They've been camped in Ottawa since Saturday, I think, making a nuisance of themselves. I did enjoy this update:
![]()
That's good!dpedin wrote: Wed Feb 02, 2022 10:07 amBrilliant but will fly over the heads of the truckers and their mates!Niegs wrote: Wed Feb 02, 2022 5:40 am Not directly related, but maybe you've heard of this convoy of 'truckers' (i.e. smaller percentage of truckers, larger percentage of anti-vaxxers/anti-mandates types in their various non-big rig vehicles, a few have displayed swastikas and white supremacist attitudes) in Canada protesting around the country?
They've been camped in Ottawa since Saturday, I think, making a nuisance of themselves. I did enjoy this update:
![]()
In addition to that and Karen Convoy, I've heard "Omicronvoy"mat the expat wrote: Wed Feb 02, 2022 11:58 amThat's good!dpedin wrote: Wed Feb 02, 2022 10:07 amBrilliant but will fly over the heads of the truckers and their mates!Niegs wrote: Wed Feb 02, 2022 5:40 am Not directly related, but maybe you've heard of this convoy of 'truckers' (i.e. smaller percentage of truckers, larger percentage of anti-vaxxers/anti-mandates types in their various non-big rig vehicles, a few have displayed swastikas and white supremacist attitudes) in Canada protesting around the country?
They've been camped in Ottawa since Saturday, I think, making a nuisance of themselves. I did enjoy this update:
![]()
Their nickname is also good:
https://twitter.com/FluTruxKlan
Calculon wrote: Wed Feb 02, 2022 7:21 amWhy don't you give us a link then?troglodiet wrote: Wed Feb 02, 2022 7:09 amTorquemada 1420 wrote: Mon Jan 31, 2022 9:34 pm
You may be right. I'm just deeply cynical about musicians when they start making statements which scream "Look at my virtuosity". Something about them as a group that makes them especially notorious for it.
Look a bit deeper into Young's recent actions and another picture is emerging.
He sold most of the rights to his music recently to a company with some very dodgy connections - dodgier than anybody saying they got cured from Covid using medically prescribed Ivermectin.
troglodiet wrote: Wed Feb 02, 2022 4:07 pm
https://youtu.be/dTn9cHGPmUw
But I bet the person giving the data will be attacked, not the message.
I love how it's "the good guys" wanting to censor everybody. That used to be the sole domain of the right. Now the ones against censorship are the Nazis. Apparently.
The truck drivers are against mandates. Why they should be equated to Nazis for this is a good question.
And what exactly did Joe Rogan say that should cause him to be de-platformed? Having a different opinion to the norm? There is a massive difference between disinfo and difference of opinion.
Or is it because he has guests with opinions from all sides of the spectrum?
Or the fact that he says he managed to shake off C19 on his own, using medicines that apparently doesn't do anything, according to no studies? Medicine decried to him by a doctor btw.
The biggest problem as I see it, is that the woke C19 thing was politicised. The minute that happened, everybody got fucked in some way by some lying POS politician.
Torquemada 1420 wrote: Tue Feb 01, 2022 9:48 amI have no strong position in regards Spotify. It is what it is, just like Faece-book etc. i.e. massive media companies without ethics....... because that's how they make money. Whilst I dislike/hold contempt for such businesses, I can't affect them and so can't be arsed getting worked up over their existences. Frankly, they only exist because of the co-operation of their users. In the case of Spotify, users also include the very same artists who are making money and then (in some cases) subsequently posturing in regards their own payer's dubious ethics. IIRC, Young removed his works from Spotify and then reinstated them.Guy Smiley wrote: Mon Jan 31, 2022 10:12 pm I'm struggling to understand your position.
On one hand you profess distrust for Young's motivations in giving up (in his own estimation) 60% of his streaming income for a moral stand, the sort of thing he's done all his career.
On the other hand, you seem to have no problem at all with the stance of the company who are prepared to shell out $100 million to host a controversial podcaster whose presented material has been shown to be misleading at best and generally dishonest.
Pardon my cynicsm here but you strike me as just another corporate favouring conservative who hates hippies, as evidenced in your automatic categorising of Young.
Tell me, do you use Spotify?
Depending on who you ask, that post falls nicely into the "misinfo" category too.Margin__Walker wrote: Wed Feb 02, 2022 4:10 pm
I managed to shake off Covid without any medicine FFS. He would have too, as the vast majority of people do
UK link for that?troglodiet wrote: Wed Feb 02, 2022 5:06 pmDepending on who you ask, that post falls nicely into the "misinfo" category too.Margin__Walker wrote: Wed Feb 02, 2022 4:10 pm
I managed to shake off Covid without any medicine FFS. He would have too, as the vast majority of people do
The official right answer is that you MUST consult a doctor, who will advise you how and with what to treat the disease, based on the severity of your illness, your medical history, and other factors such as co-morbidities.
If you were Jimmy Dore, Joe Rogan, Russell Brand, Dave Rubin or a million other content creators, you could easily have been accused of misinformation, as some idiots may think you're advising against any medical intervention.
It's a fine line between opinion and disinformation these days.
Think they're mostly getting equated with Nazis because some of them are white nationalists prancing around with swastikas.troglodiet wrote: Wed Feb 02, 2022 4:07 pm
The truck drivers are against mandates. Why they should be equated to Nazis for this is a good question.
So some are Nazis, fair enough.robmatic wrote: Wed Feb 02, 2022 5:24 pmThink they're mostly getting equated with Nazis because some of them are white nationalists prancing around with swastikas.troglodiet wrote: Wed Feb 02, 2022 4:07 pm
The truck drivers are against mandates. Why they should be equated to Nazis for this is a good question.
You're the one talking about official right answers chief.troglodiet wrote: Wed Feb 02, 2022 5:27 pm
I'm not in or from the UK so wouldn't know.
That in itself proves how impossible it is to really define misinfo.
Hence the caveat: "depending on who you ask"
Well, it makes the rest of them people who are happy to pal around with Nazis.troglodiet wrote: Wed Feb 02, 2022 5:29 pmSo some are Nazis, fair enough.robmatic wrote: Wed Feb 02, 2022 5:24 pmThink they're mostly getting equated with Nazis because some of them are white nationalists prancing around with swastikas.troglodiet wrote: Wed Feb 02, 2022 4:07 pm
The truck drivers are against mandates. Why they should be equated to Nazis for this is a good question.
Does that make all of them Nazis then?
https://www.bbc.com/news/60199614troglodiet wrote: Wed Feb 02, 2022 4:07 pm
And what exactly did Joe Rogan say that should cause him to be de-platformed? Having a different opinion to the norm? There is a massive difference between disinfo and difference of opinion.
If you hang around with nazis, don't be surprised if you get called a nazi.troglodiet wrote: Wed Feb 02, 2022 5:29 pmSo some are Nazis, fair enough.robmatic wrote: Wed Feb 02, 2022 5:24 pmThink they're mostly getting equated with Nazis because some of them are white nationalists prancing around with swastikas.troglodiet wrote: Wed Feb 02, 2022 4:07 pm
The truck drivers are against mandates. Why they should be equated to Nazis for this is a good question.
Does that make all of them Nazis then?
Sorry. Was that "you do use Spotify" or "you don't use Spotify"?Guy Smiley wrote: Wed Feb 02, 2022 4:57 pmTorquemada 1420 wrote: Tue Feb 01, 2022 9:48 amI have no strong position in regards Spotify. It is what it is, just like Faece-book etc. i.e. massive media companies without ethics....... because that's how they make money. Whilst I dislike/hold contempt for such businesses, I can't affect them and so can't be arsed getting worked up over their existences. Frankly, they only exist because of the co-operation of their users. In the case of Spotify, users also include the very same artists who are making money and then (in some cases) subsequently posturing in regards their own payer's dubious ethics. IIRC, Young removed his works from Spotify and then reinstated them.Guy Smiley wrote: Mon Jan 31, 2022 10:12 pm I'm struggling to understand your position.
On one hand you profess distrust for Young's motivations in giving up (in his own estimation) 60% of his streaming income for a moral stand, the sort of thing he's done all his career.
On the other hand, you seem to have no problem at all with the stance of the company who are prepared to shell out $100 million to host a controversial podcaster whose presented material has been shown to be misleading at best and generally dishonest.
Pardon my cynicsm here but you strike me as just another corporate favouring conservative who hates hippies, as evidenced in your automatic categorising of Young.
Tell me, do you use Spotify?
Ok... so big corporates are what they are and that's fine but cyncism over the perceived motivations of two musos, unsupported by any factual evidence, is fair and reasonable.
Gotcha.
I'm trying to figure out if you're being satirical or are actually serious? I don't have a handle on your covid persona.troglodiet wrote: Wed Feb 02, 2022 5:06 pmDepending on who you ask, that post falls nicely into the "misinfo" category too.Margin__Walker wrote: Wed Feb 02, 2022 4:10 pm
I managed to shake off Covid without any medicine FFS. He would have too, as the vast majority of people do
The official right answer is that you MUST consult a doctor, who will advise you how and with what to treat the disease, based on the severity of your illness, your medical history, and other factors such as co-morbidities.
If you were Jimmy Dore, Joe Rogan, Russell Brand, Dave Rubin or a million other content creators, you could easily have been accused of misinformation, as some idiots may think you're advising against any medical intervention.
It's a fine line between opinion and disinformation these days.
He has a point. If the President of the US tells 350m subjects to inject bleach and is not "deplatformed", why should anyone else be?Snooze wrote: Wed Feb 02, 2022 5:48 pmhttps://www.bbc.com/news/60199614troglodiet wrote: Wed Feb 02, 2022 4:07 pm
And what exactly did Joe Rogan say that should cause him to be de-platformed? Having a different opinion to the norm? There is a massive difference between disinfo and difference of opinion.
Just for starters. Misinformation would be the nicest term you could use. Lies and conspiracy theories is another.
OK.Torquemada 1420 wrote: Wed Feb 02, 2022 9:15 pmHe has a point. If the President of the US tells 350m subjects to inject bleach and is not "deplatformed", why should anyone else be?Snooze wrote: Wed Feb 02, 2022 5:48 pmhttps://www.bbc.com/news/60199614troglodiet wrote: Wed Feb 02, 2022 4:07 pm
And what exactly did Joe Rogan say that should cause him to be de-platformed? Having a different opinion to the norm? There is a massive difference between disinfo and difference of opinion.
Just for starters. Misinformation would be the nicest term you could use. Lies and conspiracy theories is another.
He believes this shit.CM11 wrote: Wed Feb 02, 2022 9:14 pmI'm trying to figure out if you're being satirical or are actually serious? I don't have a handle on your covid persona.troglodiet wrote: Wed Feb 02, 2022 5:06 pmDepending on who you ask, that post falls nicely into the "misinfo" category too.Margin__Walker wrote: Wed Feb 02, 2022 4:10 pm
I managed to shake off Covid without any medicine FFS. He would have too, as the vast majority of people do
The official right answer is that you MUST consult a doctor, who will advise you how and with what to treat the disease, based on the severity of your illness, your medical history, and other factors such as co-morbidities.
If you were Jimmy Dore, Joe Rogan, Russell Brand, Dave Rubin or a million other content creators, you could easily have been accused of misinformation, as some idiots may think you're advising against any medical intervention.
It's a fine line between opinion and disinformation these days.
And who checks the "Fact checkers" at the BBC?Snooze wrote: Wed Feb 02, 2022 5:48 pmhttps://www.bbc.com/news/60199614troglodiet wrote: Wed Feb 02, 2022 4:07 pm
And what exactly did Joe Rogan say that should cause him to be de-platformed? Having a different opinion to the norm? There is a massive difference between disinfo and difference of opinion.
Just for starters. Misinformation would be the nicest term you could use. Lies and conspiracy theories is another.
My individual habits involving the use of any of the web based conglomerates is entirely irrelevant to this discussion and your attempts to head off down that alley suggest your argument is in bad faith.Torquemada 1420 wrote: Wed Feb 02, 2022 9:11 pmSorry. Was that "you do use Spotify" or "you don't use Spotify"?Guy Smiley wrote: Wed Feb 02, 2022 4:57 pmTorquemada 1420 wrote: Tue Feb 01, 2022 9:48 am
I have no strong position in regards Spotify. It is what it is, just like Faece-book etc. i.e. massive media companies without ethics....... because that's how they make money. Whilst I dislike/hold contempt for such businesses, I can't affect them and so can't be arsed getting worked up over their existences. Frankly, they only exist because of the co-operation of their users. In the case of Spotify, users also include the very same artists who are making money and then (in some cases) subsequently posturing in regards their own payer's dubious ethics. IIRC, Young removed his works from Spotify and then reinstated them.
Tell me, do you use Spotify?
Ok... so big corporates are what they are and that's fine but cyncism over the perceived motivations of two musos, unsupported by any factual evidence, is fair and reasonable.
Gotcha.
So that's a yes then?Guy Smiley wrote: Thu Feb 03, 2022 7:18 amMy individual habits involving the use of any of the web based conglomerates is entirely irrelevant to this discussion and your attempts to head off down that alley suggest your argument is in bad faith.Torquemada 1420 wrote: Wed Feb 02, 2022 9:11 pmSorry. Was that "you do use Spotify" or "you don't use Spotify"?Guy Smiley wrote: Wed Feb 02, 2022 4:57 pm
Ok... so big corporates are what they are and that's fine but cyncism over the perceived motivations of two musos, unsupported by any factual evidence, is fair and reasonable.
Gotcha.
I just found it interesting that you'd express such disdain for the two musos and specifically suggest their motives were less than honest. You started off slurring their characters, with no real basis to it other than your feelings.
We've progressed far enough with this to see it won't go anywhere. I've no real judgement on any of it... your tastes are your own.
It's been an illuminating interlude. Keep on rockin' in the free world.
Finally somebody actually asks the right question.
Since when is the lab escape theory broadly accepted?troglodiet wrote: Thu Feb 03, 2022 10:39 amFinally somebody actually asks the right question.
The short answer is: I don't really hold specific views on the disease. I have been double-vaccinated, I wear a mask in places I have to (but I tend to avoid these places so not really an issue).
I am no medical doctor, I have no medical background, I did not even have Biology at school. If it comes to uninformed, I'm that person.
What I do feel strongly about, is the right of people to give their opinions, even if it differs from mine. In fact, I prefer to hear different opinions - a good argument can change my mind, or reinforce my own ideas.
I don't like the fact that the views of those who don't follow the official narrative, are labelled misinformation, or conspiracies. Who says the official narrative is true? Top medical professionals disagree, so how can a Facebook fact-checker decide what is and what's not misinformation? Not too long ago, even alluding that the virus escaped from the Wuhan lab turned you into a conspiracy theorist and you'd get banned from Facebook, Twitter, Youtube and others. Now it's the accepted theory. So were all those saying it definitely absolutely did not escape from teh Wuhan lab also guilty of misinformation?
And my main point: I am against censorship. Why do they want to deplatform or "cancel" people the whole time? I'm sure Young's music can co-exist with Rogan's podcast on the same platform? Hell, instead of this ultimatum, why didn't they have a nice chat like the ones Rogan have with people from all over the spectrum?
Welcome to the Free censored world eh?