Re: The Official English Rugby Thread
Posted: Fri Mar 17, 2023 12:42 pm
Ouch.
Real shame for him, he was very much a rare bright spot for England this 6N.
A place where escape goats go to play
https://notplanetrugby.com/
Ouch.
Scabnose & his coaches have learned nothing from the mistakes of Jones & his ilk
I hope this is a freak accident, and not the sort of training that Eddie used to indulge in.
They deserve some praise this week for nothing else than attitude particularly under the circumstances.
Whilst we were better today, much better, we still completely failed to get our wings involved in attack - we just appear incapable of getting the ball out wide with any space whatsoever. It's good that we've moved on from Nowell and May, but there's just not much point if all they are employed to do is field, and chase, kicks.el capitan wrote: ↑Sat Mar 18, 2023 7:49 pm That's been a fairly awful tournament, in my opinion.
The results and being behind some of the teams you can understand. Early days under a new coach things will take time. It's understandable if there is experimentation with tactics/selection to find something that works, and with one eye on the world cup and trying to find the right combinations.
But saying all that, we do need to put things in place quickly for the autumn and you'd hope we see some green shoots and signs for positivity. Well for me there hasn't been much on that front.
As a team in every aspect - attack, defence, set piece, discipline, forwards, back, whatever - I can't honestly say I've seen improved facets. In fact in some areas, especially defence, we've got worse I'd say. And whilst I don't mind adapting the gameplan to the opposition to try and get at them, it's had a feeling of tactics tombola at times. Like we're trying a new thing each week.
Individually have we learnt that much, ones you can confidently put a tick in the box next to? Maybe Ludlam and Willis, Chessum, possibly Lawrence. Not sure we've found out a great deal on the whole though.
Lot of work to do.
Yeah - if you hadn't already, it's time to completely write off the RWC. Hopefully there'll be a reset once that is done and dusted - with quite a few players put out to pasture.
And not winning against decent sides in either situation.
They do have a very favourable draw. Even with the one dimensional team we're likely to send, I guess we could definitely make the semis. Even up against a far better side in the semis, a bit of luck, and a stirring performance, can see you through.Kawazaki wrote: ↑Sun Mar 19, 2023 12:34 pm
If England managed to reach a RWC final in 2007 with that shitpot team then they can do it again, especially with a draw like they have. Prepare for the worst and hope for the best.
Really cagey.
Steve Borthwick has warned that England’s players are not yet fit enough to compete at the World Cup but admits he does not have the power to address the problem before the squad reassembles for the pre-tournament camp this summer.
Ireland’s 29-16 victory over Borthwick’s side underscored their status as one of the World Cup favourites, with Andy Farrell’s side completing a fourth Grand Slam, and illustrated the amount of work England need to do.
Borthwick will attend a coaches’ conference over the next couple of days before conducting a full review of their Six Nations campaign – which yielded only two wins for the third successive year – on Wednesday.
And top of his list of priorities is to improve the conditioning of his players, insisting that while it improved during the course of the championship, ultimately cost them dearly.
“If you reflect on the Scotland game, which is the first one we played, and the last 20 minutes, you saw the drop off which is where Scotland then beat us,” said Borthwick.
“We have to make sure we get the condition of the players right and allow the players to come into camp in a really good condition so we can push on. We don’t want to spend the World Cup camp trying to get fit. We want to use the World Cup camp to get better.
“Once the players leave on Sunday and return to their clubs, we have no control over them. We will have conversations with the players and with their clubs so we can give what we would like but ultimately we don’t have any control over that.” –
“We will go through the whole Six Nations and what the key lessons are as a debrief and then next week I will be communicating with the DoRs [directors of rugby], head coaches and players. We have got to learn faster than anyone else.”
The RFU and Premiership club are set to open negotiations over a new professional game agreement next year including the release of players to national camp and Borthwick insists the current set-up has to change if England are to become a world force again.
“Conor O’Shea is working as the performance director and they are in early negotiations over the new PGA. Hopefully working together, Conor with the clubs, the RFU with the clubs and PRL, we will be able to develop a system that enables the club game to thrive and the international team to thrive.
"That is what we all want, we want a really competitive, vibrant Premiership rugby that produces the best possible players in a condition ready for Test rugby to be able to compete at the top of Test rugby. Because that is where we want to be. We don’t want multiple Six Nations with only a couple of wins. We want to be at the top of the championship.”
Clubs and country must get on same page to get England fit for World Cup
Of all the details of Steve Borthwick’s review of England’s Six Nations campaign, arguably the most damning will be the conclusion that he would not have employed the same game plan in the opening round defeat by Scotland had he known about the level of fitness of his players.
Borthwick had already begun drafting his review before Saturday’s 29-16 defeat by Ireland, which secured a historic fourth Grand Slam for Andy Farrell’s side and condemned England to a third successive championship of just two wins from five.
And one thing is certain is that it will be far more excoriating that the Rugby Football Union’s assessment at the end of last year’s campaign that they had been ‘encouraged by the solid progress’ in what proved to be Eddie Jones’ last in charge.
Given the hospital pass of Borthwick's 11th hour appointment in the World Cup cycle, this Six Nations was always going to be a baseline holding operation for England.
And, on a positive note, there was enough in the performance against Ireland to suggest that some progress has been made and some optimism, however seemingly fanciful, to be had going into the World Cup in France.
Forget the controversy and impact of Freddie Steward’s red card and the costly indiscipline of Jack Willis’ yellow card, there were moments when we got a glimpse of how a Borthwick side will play – direct, menacing and with tempo.
Word from inside the camp suggests that Owen Farrell was back to his commanding self last week, a reaction to the trauma of the mauling by France. Initial feedback is that the team were able to stick more rigidly to the game plan compared to the French defeat, when it fell apart alarmingly.
There were obvious improvements to the set-piece too, bringing back memories of England’s dominance there against Ireland at Twickenham despite the red card to Charlie Ewels.
On the hour mark, despite being undone by a rash of penalties, England remained in the hunt, only trailing 10-9, and had been able to force Ireland into making uncharacteristic errors, with the pressure of the occasion no doubt adding to the handling errors.
Ireland still had the class, wherewithal and pragmatism to ultimately ease to a comfortable victory, underscoring their status as the best side in the world.
But if England’s ability to stay in the fight for longer was a baby step forward, there can be no shying away from the fact that at this level, the players do not have the necessary conditioning to maintain their intensity for 80 minutes, particularly when the opposition are able to up the tempo, as Scotland did at Twickenham in the final quarter.
Given the resources available to both club and country, that is just not acceptable.
There is also much work to be done on expanding England’s so far limited attacking game under Borthwick. But that is the area, he insists, requires the most time.
Borthwick as a player still remembers the pain of England’s 36-0 defeat by South Africa in the pool stages of the 2007 World Cup, having started the game on the bench.
The following day the England squad held an emergency meeting, laying down some home truths to head coach Brian Ashton and his coaching team to establish greater clarity of thought and ambition. England reached the World Cup final, and came within an inch (or Mark Cueto’s toe) of becoming the first side to win back-to-back titles.
Right now England are facing a similar sliding-doors moment. Borthwick at least has more time than his predecessor Ashton.
But when he makes his presentation to the RFU board later this month about what is needed to improve the alignment between club and country and the preparation and development of players for Test rugby, they would do well to listen.
A similar finale to 2007 may yet be in England’s grasp
If it may be impossible to replicate Ireland’s centrally controlled system because of the fact the Premiership clubs are privately owned, France have demonstrated what is possible despite similar constraints.
At a time when rugby union is facing so many off-field challenges, both the clubs and the RFU should recognise that both parties will benefit from putting together an interim arrangement ahead of the new professional game agreement due next year to improve the chance of success for the national side, starting with an agreed conditioning programme for the players while they are back with their clubs.
“I have told the players, we have got to learn faster than anybody else,” said Borthwick. “We have to make sure we learn from this defeat to make sure we get better. We want to make sure we have a team that can compete at the World Cup.
“This debrief I want to go through now of the tournament is going to be integral to us going forward. What we've learned about all the players, we've learned about working with each other, what works, what doesn't work. What are the biggest areas of growth in us. Those are the things we're going to have to look at now.”
With a fair wind, there is still time for structures to be put in place. England have the benefit of a kind draw in the World Cup. If the winner seems likely to come from Ireland’s side of the draw, which includes France and New Zealand, a similar finale to 2007 may yet be in England’s grasp.
Paddington Bear wrote: ↑Mon Mar 20, 2023 2:51 pmWho was the author?SpoilerShowSteve Borthwick has warned that England’s players are not yet fit enough to compete at the World Cup but admits he does not have the power to address the problem before the squad reassembles for the pre-tournament camp this summer.
Ireland’s 29-16 victory over Borthwick’s side underscored their status as one of the World Cup favourites, with Andy Farrell’s side completing a fourth Grand Slam, and illustrated the amount of work England need to do.
Borthwick will attend a coaches’ conference over the next couple of days before conducting a full review of their Six Nations campaign – which yielded only two wins for the third successive year – on Wednesday.
And top of his list of priorities is to improve the conditioning of his players, insisting that while it improved during the course of the championship, ultimately cost them dearly.
“If you reflect on the Scotland game, which is the first one we played, and the last 20 minutes, you saw the drop off which is where Scotland then beat us,” said Borthwick.
“We have to make sure we get the condition of the players right and allow the players to come into camp in a really good condition so we can push on. We don’t want to spend the World Cup camp trying to get fit. We want to use the World Cup camp to get better.
“Once the players leave on Sunday and return to their clubs, we have no control over them. We will have conversations with the players and with their clubs so we can give what we would like but ultimately we don’t have any control over that.” –
“We will go through the whole Six Nations and what the key lessons are as a debrief and then next week I will be communicating with the DoRs [directors of rugby], head coaches and players. We have got to learn faster than anyone else.”
The RFU and Premiership club are set to open negotiations over a new professional game agreement next year including the release of players to national camp and Borthwick insists the current set-up has to change if England are to become a world force again.
“Conor O’Shea is working as the performance director and they are in early negotiations over the new PGA. Hopefully working together, Conor with the clubs, the RFU with the clubs and PRL, we will be able to develop a system that enables the club game to thrive and the international team to thrive.
"That is what we all want, we want a really competitive, vibrant Premiership rugby that produces the best possible players in a condition ready for Test rugby to be able to compete at the top of Test rugby. Because that is where we want to be. We don’t want multiple Six Nations with only a couple of wins. We want to be at the top of the championship.”
Clubs and country must get on same page to get England fit for World Cup
Of all the details of Steve Borthwick’s review of England’s Six Nations campaign, arguably the most damning will be the conclusion that he would not have employed the same game plan in the opening round defeat by Scotland had he known about the level of fitness of his players.
Borthwick had already begun drafting his review before Saturday’s 29-16 defeat by Ireland, which secured a historic fourth Grand Slam for Andy Farrell’s side and condemned England to a third successive championship of just two wins from five.
And one thing is certain is that it will be far more excoriating that the Rugby Football Union’s assessment at the end of last year’s campaign that they had been ‘encouraged by the solid progress’ in what proved to be Eddie Jones’ last in charge.
Given the hospital pass of Borthwick's 11th hour appointment in the World Cup cycle, this Six Nations was always going to be a baseline holding operation for England.
And, on a positive note, there was enough in the performance against Ireland to suggest that some progress has been made and some optimism, however seemingly fanciful, to be had going into the World Cup in France.
Forget the controversy and impact of Freddie Steward’s red card and the costly indiscipline of Jack Willis’ yellow card, there were moments when we got a glimpse of how a Borthwick side will play – direct, menacing and with tempo.
Word from inside the camp suggests that Owen Farrell was back to his commanding self last week, a reaction to the trauma of the mauling by France. Initial feedback is that the team were able to stick more rigidly to the game plan compared to the French defeat, when it fell apart alarmingly.
There were obvious improvements to the set-piece too, bringing back memories of England’s dominance there against Ireland at Twickenham despite the red card to Charlie Ewels.
On the hour mark, despite being undone by a rash of penalties, England remained in the hunt, only trailing 10-9, and had been able to force Ireland into making uncharacteristic errors, with the pressure of the occasion no doubt adding to the handling errors.
Ireland still had the class, wherewithal and pragmatism to ultimately ease to a comfortable victory, underscoring their status as the best side in the world.
But if England’s ability to stay in the fight for longer was a baby step forward, there can be no shying away from the fact that at this level, the players do not have the necessary conditioning to maintain their intensity for 80 minutes, particularly when the opposition are able to up the tempo, as Scotland did at Twickenham in the final quarter.
Given the resources available to both club and country, that is just not acceptable.
There is also much work to be done on expanding England’s so far limited attacking game under Borthwick. But that is the area, he insists, requires the most time.
Borthwick as a player still remembers the pain of England’s 36-0 defeat by South Africa in the pool stages of the 2007 World Cup, having started the game on the bench.
The following day the England squad held an emergency meeting, laying down some home truths to head coach Brian Ashton and his coaching team to establish greater clarity of thought and ambition. England reached the World Cup final, and came within an inch (or Mark Cueto’s toe) of becoming the first side to win back-to-back titles.
Right now England are facing a similar sliding-doors moment. Borthwick at least has more time than his predecessor Ashton.
But when he makes his presentation to the RFU board later this month about what is needed to improve the alignment between club and country and the preparation and development of players for Test rugby, they would do well to listen.
A similar finale to 2007 may yet be in England’s grasp
If it may be impossible to replicate Ireland’s centrally controlled system because of the fact the Premiership clubs are privately owned, France have demonstrated what is possible despite similar constraints.
At a time when rugby union is facing so many off-field challenges, both the clubs and the RFU should recognise that both parties will benefit from putting together an interim arrangement ahead of the new professional game agreement due next year to improve the chance of success for the national side, starting with an agreed conditioning programme for the players while they are back with their clubs.
“I have told the players, we have got to learn faster than anybody else,” said Borthwick. “We have to make sure we learn from this defeat to make sure we get better. We want to make sure we have a team that can compete at the World Cup.
“This debrief I want to go through now of the tournament is going to be integral to us going forward. What we've learned about all the players, we've learned about working with each other, what works, what doesn't work. What are the biggest areas of growth in us. Those are the things we're going to have to look at now.”
With a fair wind, there is still time for structures to be put in place. England have the benefit of a kind draw in the World Cup. If the winner seems likely to come from Ireland’s side of the draw, which includes France and New Zealand, a similar finale to 2007 may yet be in England’s grasp.
Oh and what the actual fuck does Conor O'Shea get paid to do?
Yeah and everyone would be thrilled with England playing the way they did before losing against a Scotland team pootling along in 2nd gear.
Conor O’Shea is working as the [RFU] performance director … Hopefully working together, Conor with the clubs, the RFU with the clubs and PRL [Premiership Rugby], we will be able to develop a system that enables the club game to thrive, and the international team to thrive.
Do they? France are the only tier one nation who actually have it and yet they're not the only national side who look better than us over the last 2-3 season.Questions remain over whether a lack of relegation is incubating styles of rugby not suited to the international gam
URC isn’t directly comparable with the amount of player rotation that goes on. We’re in a middle ground between different types of league as a result. As I say, questions, I don’t have a firm take on this. On the one hand our sides increasingly lack bite, on the other as a consumer of the Prem I am entertained without fail every week.sockwithaticket wrote: ↑Mon Mar 20, 2023 6:15 pmDo they? France are the only tier one nation who actually have it and yet they're not the only national side who look better than us over the last 2-3 season.Questions remain over whether a lack of relegation is incubating styles of rugby not suited to the international gam
Super Rugby doesn't have it either and while NZ aren't the dominant force they used to be, they still had us on toast for 70 minutes this autumn just gone and have finished the last few seasons with a winning record.Paddington Bear wrote: ↑Mon Mar 20, 2023 6:21 pmURC isn’t directly comparable with the amount of player rotation that goes on. We’re in a middle ground between different types of league as a result. As I say, questions, I don’t have a firm take on this. On the one hand our sides increasingly lack bite, on the other as a consumer of the Prem I am entertained without fail every week.sockwithaticket wrote: ↑Mon Mar 20, 2023 6:15 pmDo they? France are the only tier one nation who actually have it and yet they're not the only national side who look better than us over the last 2-3 season.Questions remain over whether a lack of relegation is incubating styles of rugby not suited to the international gam
Yep, which factors into my final point. Do our guys give a shit?sockwithaticket wrote: ↑Mon Mar 20, 2023 6:43 pmSuper Rugby doesn't have it either and while NZ aren't the dominant force they used to be, they still had us on toast for 70 minutes this autumn just gone and have finished the last few seasons with a winning record.Paddington Bear wrote: ↑Mon Mar 20, 2023 6:21 pmURC isn’t directly comparable with the amount of player rotation that goes on. We’re in a middle ground between different types of league as a result. As I say, questions, I don’t have a firm take on this. On the one hand our sides increasingly lack bite, on the other as a consumer of the Prem I am entertained without fail every week.sockwithaticket wrote: ↑Mon Mar 20, 2023 6:15 pm
Do they? France are the only tier one nation who actually have it and yet they're not the only national side who look better than us over the last 2-3 season.
The main lack of bite is clearly up front and I think part of the issue lies in several of our more recently successful sides (Leicester, Sale, Exeter) buying in a bunch of South African (or Namibian or Zimbabwean) forwards to do all the tough stuff for them. I'm sure that enables some of the English forwards to focus less on carrying and do more of the 'technical' tight stuff like securing ball at resultant rucks.
We've also lacked response time to things like loose balls. It's tempting to put that down to 'hunger' or 'wanting it', in which case why do other teams want it or have more hunger in those situations than us?
The quality of play might not be the best but it is very competitive. They have clearly aimed towards a more American/nfl model for the league. The European comps with their daft structure are a bit shite.ASMO wrote: ↑Tue Mar 21, 2023 7:16 am Too many commentators wank over the Prem as being the best domestic competition when it clearly is not. The moment Prem teams go into Europe they pretty much perhaps with the exception of Saracens get wiped out. The entertainment factor in the Prem might be high, but the skill levels and general rugby nous is way behind the URC and France...the sooner people recognise that, the sooner something might change. This is reflected fully at international level.
And fun.petej wrote: ↑Tue Mar 21, 2023 8:43 amThe quality of play might not be the best but it is very competitive. They have clearly aimed towards a more American/nfl model for the league. The European comps with their daft structure are a bit shite.ASMO wrote: ↑Tue Mar 21, 2023 7:16 am Too many commentators wank over the Prem as being the best domestic competition when it clearly is not. The moment Prem teams go into Europe they pretty much perhaps with the exception of Saracens get wiped out. The entertainment factor in the Prem might be high, but the skill levels and general rugby nous is way behind the URC and France...the sooner people recognise that, the sooner something might change. This is reflected fully at international level.