Re: The Official English Rugby Thread
Posted: Sun May 14, 2023 3:13 pm
2 teams playing eye bleedingly boring shit rugby
A place where escape goats go to play
https://notplanetrugby.com/
Wonder how much cash Newcastle have?sockwithaticket wrote: ↑Mon May 15, 2023 6:04 pm Well the Glaws CEO is the latest one to have spouting off about the benefits of a 10 team Prem. I suspect the LI situation might be handled by the various powers that be with that goal in mind, unfortunately.
It's certainly not a healthy picture for them. They already spend less than anyone else apparently and yet they still let a couple of their best players go during the season and their head coach.Glaston wrote: ↑Mon May 15, 2023 6:47 pmWonder how much cash Newcastle have?sockwithaticket wrote: ↑Mon May 15, 2023 6:04 pm Well the Glaws CEO is the latest one to have spouting off about the benefits of a 10 team Prem. I suspect the LI situation might be handled by the various powers that be with that goal in mind, unfortunately.
2024 season down to 9 clubs
Yep, If the buyout is serious (big if), they hold all the cards now with the deadline terms set and fast approaching. Crossan's likely going to get fucked however this ends up going.Paddington Bear wrote: ↑Mon May 15, 2023 7:04 pm Yes strikes me the buyers are stringing this out to test just how desperate Crossan is to get out with the intention of low balling as much as they can. Bit of a game of chicken with PRL/RFU a likely deeply unhelpful third party
I feel like a smarmy git sat here criticising and second guessing a man who has set up a really successful business from scratch, among other things, but being so public and vocal with how desperate to sell he was seemed always likely to end with the sharks circling round him as they are.Margin__Walker wrote: ↑Mon May 15, 2023 7:13 pmYep, If the buyout is serious (big if), they hold all the cards now with the deadline terms set and fast approaching. Crossan's likely going to get fucked however this ends up going.Paddington Bear wrote: ↑Mon May 15, 2023 7:04 pm Yes strikes me the buyers are stringing this out to test just how desperate Crossan is to get out with the intention of low balling as much as they can. Bit of a game of chicken with PRL/RFU a likely deeply unhelpful third party
Yeah, possibly. As relaxed as he tried to make it, it was clearly an indication of discomfort. Ultimately his problem is that he's a fan and has an emotional connection that's caused him to stick with the project well past where he probably would with any other business.Paddington Bear wrote: ↑Mon May 15, 2023 9:29 pmI feel like a smarmy git sat here criticising and second guessing a man who has set up a really successful business from scratch, among other things, but being so public and vocal with how desperate to sell he was seemed always likely to end with the sharks circling round him as they are.Margin__Walker wrote: ↑Mon May 15, 2023 7:13 pmYep, If the buyout is serious (big if), they hold all the cards now with the deadline terms set and fast approaching. Crossan's likely going to get fucked however this ends up going.Paddington Bear wrote: ↑Mon May 15, 2023 7:04 pm Yes strikes me the buyers are stringing this out to test just how desperate Crossan is to get out with the intention of low balling as much as they can. Bit of a game of chicken with PRL/RFU a likely deeply unhelpful third party
Paddington Bear wrote: ↑Mon May 15, 2023 7:04 pm Yes strikes me the buyers are stringing this out to test just how desperate Crossan is to get out with the intention of low balling as much as they can. Bit of a game of chicken with PRL/RFU a likely deeply unhelpful third party
There must be a few lads on very decent wages in that squad, like Jackson, Creevy, Coleman.Kawazaki wrote: ↑Tue May 16, 2023 6:05 am The problem with LI is what exactly is for sale, what does he own? He owns a rugby brand, a small percentage of the 74% of the Premiership and the contractual use of about 50 professional rugby players with zero transfer value.
They've got less than Worcester and Wasps had to sell and they've already approached everyone to find a buyer. The only USP LI have is the word 'Irish' in their name but the IRFU aren't interested either.
It does seem that reducing to 10 clubs is a done deal but I don't see how that improves things, it's just a slightly larger percentage of a smaller pie.
If you're actually interested in owning and running an elite rugby club (rather than purely asset stripping), I'd argue LI has more going for it than those two. Based in the capital. As prem rugby clubs go, not saddled with the same amount of external debt as the other two. As I understand it, the vast majority of the '£30m in debt' is to Crossan followed by the DCMS. The oft quoted line about giving the club away for a quid, presumably was a little more nuanced than that. Sure he'd sell for a quid, but there would be a conversation about how much of his debt he'd write off as part of that. You'd think he's probably at a point now where he'd be forgetting about most of it trying to get out, so that £30m debt figure isn't really as scary. Not compared to Wasps and Worcester anyway.Kawazaki wrote: ↑Tue May 16, 2023 6:05 am The problem with LI is what exactly is for sale, what does he own? He owns a rugby brand, a small percentage of the 74% of the Premiership and the contractual use of about 50 professional rugby players with zero transfer value.
They've got less than Worcester and Wasps had to sell and they've already approached everyone to find a buyer. The only USP LI have is the word 'Irish' in their name but the IRFU aren't interested either.
It does seem that reducing to 10 clubs is a done deal but I don't see how that improves things, it's just a slightly larger percentage of a smaller pie.
Strong Richmond vibessockwithaticket wrote: ↑Mon May 15, 2023 6:04 pm Well the Glaws CEO is the latest one to have spouting off about the benefits of a 10 team Prem. I suspect the LI situation might be handled by the various powers that be with that goal in mind, unfortunately.
Margin__Walker wrote: ↑Tue May 16, 2023 7:27 am
The club does also own the modern 63 acre Hazelwood training complex in Sunbury. Lots of pitches, conferencing facilities, gets hired out to visiting NFL teams each year etc.
Yeah, worth a few quid and believe the DCMS loan is secured against it. Also think it's greenfield, so was hard enough to get planning for leisure for it. Not the sort of thing you could acquire and stick houses on which limits the value. Straying outside my area of expertise thoughKawazaki wrote: ↑Tue May 16, 2023 8:30 amMargin__Walker wrote: ↑Tue May 16, 2023 7:27 am
The club does also own the modern 63 acre Hazelwood training complex in Sunbury. Lots of pitches, conferencing facilities, gets hired out to visiting NFL teams each year etc.
63 acres of land inside the M25 must be worth a lot more than £30m? A hell of a lot more.
£1 plus clearing his debts, so £30m+1. They're trying to see how much of that he'll write off IMHO.Kawazaki wrote: ↑Tue May 16, 2023 5:49 amPaddington Bear wrote: ↑Mon May 15, 2023 7:04 pm Yes strikes me the buyers are stringing this out to test just how desperate Crossan is to get out with the intention of low balling as much as they can. Bit of a game of chicken with PRL/RFU a likely deeply unhelpful third party
He's offered to sell the club for £1.
Do you think the buyers are holding out for 80p?
They did have a few things pencilled in .sockwithaticket wrote: ↑Thu May 18, 2023 5:13 pm Fuck's sake. I was starting to fear the worst anyway with no players, staff or ground, but you always have hope until it's dashed.
Guess I'd best take good care of the shirts I have, probably looking at 15 years - never for new ones.
Yeah just found this on Drunken WaspsGlaston wrote: ↑Thu May 18, 2023 8:16 pmThey did have a few things pencilled in .sockwithaticket wrote: ↑Thu May 18, 2023 5:13 pm Fuck's sake. I was starting to fear the worst anyway with no players, staff or ground, but you always have hope until it's dashed.
Guess I'd best take good care of the shirts I have, probably looking at 15 years - never for new ones.
Had a kit deal and some sponsorship lined up. ( Allegedly)
Supposedly some players and staff lined up but all dependant on getting into the Championship.
There is a Statement from Peter Scrivener on one of the Wasps boards.
Our exit from the Rugby Football Union
It has been an all-consuming 7 months since the 17th of October 2022. Our first task was to save and secure the brand, the IP, and the legend ? and in that we have been successful. Since then, we have been constantly involved in the resurrection of the club with the intention of competing in the 2023 RFU Championship.
Operating in a void between regulatory authorities that were managed by strict governance requirements, and a championship that had not been engaged in our membership and who, perhaps understandably, offered some resentment to our inclusion, has been challenging.
Our recovery to date has been managed by a very small team who have been dealing with the operational and financial issues and requirements of the RFU and PRL since our engagement in November 2022 when we were successful in the approval process to enter the RFU Championship in September 2023. That approval was subject to initial and then continuing requirements around financing, ground, rugby creditors and the demanding governance provisions. During our approval process, and since, we have continually reminded the RFU that we would not repeat the mistakes of the past by allowing a single point of failure, and that we would not commit to any employment or contract unless we were sure that
we would be able to fund the expenditure for the season.
We have embarked on a wide ranging, and professional search, for suitable funding. From the outset we had interest from various sources who engaged in their own due
diligence, some in depth to the extent that they had direct contact with the governing bodies. Whilst the investment interest continues, we regret to say that the current state of rugby finances, the lack of clarity on the league structure and concerns over promotion has caused the investor group to remain silent and fatigued.
On two occasions we asked the RFU for an extension of time to secure funding and to satisfy the rugby creditors. Our requests were refused on both occasions. Whilst we understand the need for regulatory conformity and the administration of the league, the only reason we needed that extension was for the RFU to establish a clear vision and direction of travel so that our investor pool were able to see equitable funding for the Championship and a clear pathway to promotion.
Indeed, the recent revelations around the possible ring fencing of the premiership for 3 to 5 years to protect it has further weakened our investment position. There is the suggestion that a route for promotion could exist with a play-off between the bottom of the premiership playing the winner of the Championship. Given there is a deficit of ?4m+ in funding between the Premiership and the Championship, then the only route of promotion includes the very problem of excessive funding that perpetuates the business system failure.
We had made progress in certain areas though. We have a kit deal, significant sponsorship from a global brand, and a choice of grounds to play at. We have 232 players and 37 coaches available to select a team from. We have also identified strong local authority support for our own stadium, and whilst some have criticised us for even considering a new stadium option, their rush to judgement ignores the stark reality that rugby at the higher levels needs supplementary income to survive without owner funding - which is the single point of failure we are determined to avoid. Rugby alone will not provide a sustainable business, until it is properly governed and financially supported.
The arrangements and direction regarding the rugby creditors has also been troublesome. We were handed the responsibility of others to identify, validate, audit, and settle the rugby creditor claims inherited from the previous administration. We established a system to manage this process and acknowledged our moral obligations to complete it.
Following our regrettable exit from the Championship, our understanding is that the rugby creditors will now revert back to the administrators for the claims to be pursued against Wasps Holdings Limited (In Administration). We will work with the administrators on this.
So, what will happen now?
The journey continues with utter determination and commitment to ensure that WASPS continues its 156-year history in a sustainable rugby environment that shares the vision
and values that the new club aspires to. We are extremely grateful for the loyal support and concern from our global fan base.
Our silence has been deliberate and necessary. Firstly, we had nothing definitive to say that couldn?t have changed the following day, and often did, and secondly, we only recovered our social media accounts and rebuilt a new web site in the first week of May. You will hear more from us soon.
The Wild Geese being in the Championship with gates of a couple of thousand within a few years of what increasingly looks inevitable seems a plausible enough scenarioMargin__Walker wrote: ↑Fri May 19, 2023 8:10 am It would be such a long term project for anyone, but the most committed investor to take on. Anyone seriously looking to invest who wasn't a die hard Wasp fan would surely look at a more mature setup from much higher up the league structure (Champ to ND2).
LI would have a similar issue if they go under, with a nice amateur setup already in place who wouldn't want the hassle. Only difference would be fewer in the way of 'rugby' creditors, which could potentially make post administration survival higher up the league structure more viable. But even that would be a long shot in the current environment.
I'd actually be a bit nervous about the blow back of the pro entity going under on the amateur setup. I'm no expert, but whilst they will obviously be sheltered from it, I'm not sure if Hazelwood, where they play will be. There's a fairly complicated ownership structure at the club with several entities including one that owns the actual facility. I'm just not sure what the charge from the DCMS covid loan covers.Paddington Bear wrote: ↑Fri May 19, 2023 9:00 amThe Wild Geese being in the Championship with gates of a couple of thousand within a few years of what increasingly looks inevitable seems a plausible enough scenarioMargin__Walker wrote: ↑Fri May 19, 2023 8:10 am It would be such a long term project for anyone, but the most committed investor to take on. Anyone seriously looking to invest who wasn't a die hard Wasp fan would surely look at a more mature setup from much higher up the league structure (Champ to ND2).
LI would have a similar issue if they go under, with a nice amateur setup already in place who wouldn't want the hassle. Only difference would be fewer in the way of 'rugby' creditors, which could potentially make post administration survival higher up the league structure more viable. But even that would be a long shot in the current environment.
Only if Sarries win it.Hal Jordan wrote: ↑Fri May 19, 2023 1:03 pm So with all the financial collapses and whatnot, I assume this season's title will have a big old asterisk by it?
Brazil wrote: ↑Fri May 19, 2023 1:06 pmOnly if Sarries win it.Hal Jordan wrote: ↑Fri May 19, 2023 1:03 pm So with all the financial collapses and whatnot, I assume this season's title will have a big old asterisk by it?
Just like their other ones.