Re: The one and only UK 2024 election thread - July 4
Posted: Sat May 25, 2024 6:33 am
"a difficult first few days..." that's something of an understatement!
A place where escape goats go to play
https://notplanetrugby.com/
It reminds me of Yes Minister when Humphrey and Arnold want to try an persuade the minister to run for PM so they tell Bernard not to let him do anything controversial. "Make sure he expresses no firm opinion on anything whatsoever!" "I think that's what he was planning on doing anyway!"
Senior Tories expect a significant number of further MP resignations over the weekend, in the wake of Gove’s and Leadsom’s decisions not to fight the election. Quite a number who have been re-approved as candidates have been in two minds, and thought they had till the autumn to decide. The party has more than 150 seats and rising with no candidate. That is a lot of candidates for CCHQ to find before 7 June and a lot of wasted campaigning days. It does rather indicate Sunak called the election before his party was ready
Calculon wrote: ↑Sun May 26, 2024 2:25 am why is the idea so crazy?
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cpddxy9r4mdo
This story is so delicious, it's unbelievable. It spanks the Tories so, so hard, albeit inadvertently.
But it will take a little explaining, so please have patience and bear with me while I walk you through it.
The Telegraph tonight is running a big splash about the first Tory pledge of the GE campaign, namely bringing back compulsory national service.
Yes, they want to force all 18-year olds to spend a year in the Army, or devote a weekend a month for a year doing community service chores.
(Related aside: they plan to get £1.5 billion of the £2.5 billion a year cost of the programme by gutting the post-Brexit shared prosperity fund, which was meant to replace the loss of EU structural funding. The diametric opposite of levelling up.)
Now here's where things get FUN!
The Telegraph embeds links within their articles to other "related" Telegraph stories to direct more traffic around their website. (I believe these links are likely inserted automatically, for SEO purposes.)
So they have this big piece about national service by Camilla Turner, their Sunday Political Editor.
And in it they've linked prominently to the older article that I've screenshot below...
Yes. They really have chosen as a representative related story an opinion piece that spells out in no uncertain terms what an utterly idiotic idea bringing back national service would be. ("Yet once again the reintroduction of National Service is being mooted by think tanks, this time as a thinly veiled mechanism for enslaving the young.")
It's like a boat-builder deliberately drilling a large hole in their new craft below the waterline, and then launching it. Sunk before it had a chance.
But the fun doesn't stop there. There's a second sneaky link lurking in tonight's article too. That one leads to an older piece entitled "Why conscription would leave Britain fighting a losing battle". This second article digs into the economics and jobs aspects of a programme such as national service, and concludes that it's a non-starter.
And if the Telegraph weren't so greedy for clicks, we'd never even have seen the articles that blow holes straight through the grand Tory plan!
Begin long, slow clap.
Link to this evening's article
https://archive.ph/6m5qj
Link to the article explaining why it's a terrible, terrible idea
https://archive.ph/M7ZIT
Link to the article about constriction being a losing battle
https://archive.ph/hsD8w
Then they need to use the money for this nonsense to fill out the hollowed out remains of the British Army and recruit people who WANT to be in the armed forces. Not force a generation of kids to waste a year square bashing.
It stinks of trying to plug holes in public services by mandating unpaid labour from the public at a time when the tax burden is already very high vs. the level of service received. That rankles in a big wayCalculon wrote: ↑Sun May 26, 2024 2:25 am why is the idea so crazy?
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cpddxy9r4mdo
The broad range of possibilities also makes you question the point. If we need to massively increase the number of fighting age people in this country with military training because we're at a time when world war three or at least a sizeable pan-European conflict seems right around the corner, then that case should actually be made to the public and all of those eligible in an age group should have to go the military route. That the military component seems voluntary and there are apparently other options suggests it is not an attempt to seriously expand military reservist capacity and capability, in which cae what's the actual point? (Other than trying to subsidise public services without spending money...)Eighteen-year-olds would be able to apply for one of 30,000 full-time military placements or volunteering one weekend a month carrying out a community service.
Yep. The armed forces are understaffed and already struggling with recruitment and retention. Use the money to make your offering to potential recruits more attractive. Better pay, housing etc.
If this is their attempt to 'reset' their campaign then they are well and truly fucked! Who the hell thought this was a good idea ... the same team who had him launch the election in a pissing thunderstorm and visit the Titanic dockyards?Margin__Walker wrote: ↑Sun May 26, 2024 9:06 amYep. The armed forces are understaffed and already struggling with recruitment and retention. Use the money to make your offering to potential recruits more attractive. Better pay, housing etc.
andor volunteering one weekend a month carrying out a community service....Non-military volunteering would involve 25 days with organisations such as the fire service, the police and the NHS.
Sorry, but where the actual fuck did you get this idea from.David in Gwent wrote: ↑Sun May 26, 2024 9:14 am Unfortunately Wokeism has infected the UK Military and it's making recruiting and retention more difficult.
Seniors with a pension already in the bank aren't interested in staying around because the kids are demanding vegan combat boots and won't do guard duty without them - which means - the on the ground experienced leadership has all but gone.
Militarily we are fucked and I'm of the belief it has all been done on purpose.
Copy the Norwegian, Swedish and Danish model?tabascoboy wrote: ↑Sun May 26, 2024 9:19 am Anyone got any ideas as to what these probably unwilling "volunteers" could actually do that wouldn't just be getting in the way of trained professionals trying to do their own jobs?
Job-shadowing during a major incident or a surgeon performing a heart bypass?
andor volunteering one weekend a month carrying out a community service....Non-military volunteering would involve 25 days with organisations such as the fire service, the police and the NHS.
Having worked alongside someone who ran all the 'work experience/student placementment programmes' in a large scale organisation I can tell you that if you want to do this properly the amount of work and worry for a small number of folk is huge and is like herding cats. They need a huge amount of input and supervision at all times by trusted and trained employees and do negatively impact on productivity and output.tabascoboy wrote: ↑Sun May 26, 2024 9:19 am Anyone got any ideas as to what these probably unwilling "volunteers" could actually do that wouldn't just be getting in the way of trained professionals trying to do their own jobs?
Job-shadowing during a major incident or a surgeon performing a heart bypass?
or volunteering one weekend a month carrying out a community service....Non-military volunteering would involve 25 days with organisations such as the fire service, the police and the NHS.
You must have missed the big palavah the RAF faced and has now changed it's clothing policy.Blackmac wrote: ↑Sun May 26, 2024 9:24 amSorry, but where the actual fuck did you get this idea from.David in Gwent wrote: ↑Sun May 26, 2024 9:14 am Unfortunately Wokeism has infected the UK Military and it's making recruiting and retention more difficult.
Seniors with a pension already in the bank aren't interested in staying around because the kids are demanding vegan combat boots and won't do guard duty without them - which means - the on the ground experienced leadership has all but gone.
Militarily we are fucked and I'm of the belief it has all been done on purpose.
You can't possibly be thinking that the demographic of kids attracted the join the forces are demanding vegan fucking boots.
Clearly you are not reading enough Russian propaganda.Blackmac wrote: ↑Sun May 26, 2024 9:24 amSorry, but where the actual fuck did you get this idea from.David in Gwent wrote: ↑Sun May 26, 2024 9:14 am Unfortunately Wokeism has infected the UK Military and it's making recruiting and retention more difficult.
Seniors with a pension already in the bank aren't interested in staying around because the kids are demanding vegan combat boots and won't do guard duty without them - which means - the on the ground experienced leadership has all but gone.
Militarily we are fucked and I'm of the belief it has all been done on purpose.
You can't possibly be thinking that the demographic of kids attracted the join the forces are demanding vegan fucking boots.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... olicy.htmlrobmatic wrote: ↑Sun May 26, 2024 9:34 amClearly you are not reading enough Russian propaganda.Blackmac wrote: ↑Sun May 26, 2024 9:24 amSorry, but where the actual fuck did you get this idea from.David in Gwent wrote: ↑Sun May 26, 2024 9:14 am Unfortunately Wokeism has infected the UK Military and it's making recruiting and retention more difficult.
Seniors with a pension already in the bank aren't interested in staying around because the kids are demanding vegan combat boots and won't do guard duty without them - which means - the on the ground experienced leadership has all but gone.
Militarily we are fucked and I'm of the belief it has all been done on purpose.
You can't possibly be thinking that the demographic of kids attracted the join the forces are demanding vegan fucking boots.
I like the way kids refusing to do guard duty without vegan combat boots turned out to be 1 vegan RAF technician.David in Gwent wrote: ↑Sun May 26, 2024 9:36 amhttps://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... olicy.html
Look, if you don't want to believe me then fair enough, that article is from a few years ago.robmatic wrote: ↑Sun May 26, 2024 10:32 amI like the way kids refusing to do guard duty without vegan combat boots turned out to be 1 vegan RAF technician.David in Gwent wrote: ↑Sun May 26, 2024 9:36 amhttps://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... olicy.html
What do the Forces personnel you know think?
I can't deny things are underfunded but you've got to juggle that with the fact the UK population has risen dramatically over the last decade or so. The infrastructure can't keep up.salanya wrote: ↑Sun May 26, 2024 10:41 am We're struggling to get teenagers to attend school/college/training consistently - how are we expecting to manage them to go to army training or attend community service?
And the cost to arrange and manage this mad scheme will be off the scale, at a time when essential services are already hugely underfunded.